TRV
Study This Verse
Commentary on Numbers 27 verses 1–11
Mention is made of the case of these daughters of Zelophehad in the chapter before, v. 33. It should seem, by the particular notice taken of it, that it was a singular case, and that the like did not at this time occur in all Israel, that the head of a family had no sons, but daughters only. Their case is again debated (Num 36:1-13) upon another article of it; and, according to the judgments given in their case, we find them put in possession, Jos 17:3, Jos 17:4. One would suppose that their personal character was such as added weight to their case, and caused it to be so often taken notice of.
Here is, I. Their case stated by themselves, and their petition upon it presented to the highest court of judicature, which consisted of Moses as king, the princes as lords, and the congregation, or elders of the people who were chose their representatives, as the commons, Num 27:2. This august assembly sat near the door of the tabernacle, that in difficult cases they might consult the oracle. To them these young ladies made their application; for it is the duty of magistrates to defend the fatherless, Psa 82:3. We find not that the had any advocate to speak for them, but they managed their own cause ingeniously enough, which they could do the better because it was plain and honest, and spoke for itself. Now observe,
1.What it is they petition for: That they might have a possession in the land of Canaan, among the brethren of their father, Num 27:4. What God had said to Moses (Num 26:53) he had faithfully made known to the people, that the land of Canaan was to be divided among those that were now numbered; these daughters knew that they were not numbered, and therefore by this rule must expect no inheritance, and the family of their father must be looked upon as extinct, and written childless, though he had all these daughters: this they thought hard, and therefore prayed to be admitted heirs to their father, and to have an inheritance in his right. If they had had a brother, they would not have applied to Moses (as one did to Christ, Luk 12:13) for an order to inherit with him. But, having no brother, they beg for a possession. Herein they discovered, (1.) A strong faith in the power and promise of God concerning the giving of the land of Canaan to Israel. Though it was yet unconquered, untouched, and in the full possession of the natives, yet they petition for their share in it as if it were all their own already. See Psa 60:6, Psa 60:7, God has spoken in his holiness, and the Gilead is mine, Manasseh is mane. (2.) An earnest desire of a place and name in the land of promise, which was a type of heaven; and if they had, as some think, an eye to that, and by this claim laid hold on eternal life, they were five wise virgins indeed; and their example should quicken us with all possible diligence to make sure our title to the heavenly inheritance, in the disposal of which, by the covenant of grace, no difference is made between male and female, Gal 3:28. (3.) A true respect and honour for their father, whose name was dear and precious to them now that he was gone, and they were therefore solicitous that it should not be done away from among his family. There is a debt which children owe to the memory of their parents, required by the fifth commandment: Honour thy father and mother.
2.What their plea is: That their father did not die under any attainder which might be thought to have corrupted his blood and forfeited his estate, but he died in his own sin (Num 27:3), not engaged in any mutiny or rebellion against Moses, particularly not in that of Korah and his company, nor in any way concerned in the sins of others, but chargeable only with the common iniquities of mankind, for which to his own Master he was to stand or fall, but laid not himself open to any judicial process before Moses and the princes. He was never convicted of any thing that might be a bar to his children's claim. It is a comfort to parents, when they come to die, if, though they smart themselves for their own sin, yet they are not conscious to themselves of any of those iniquities which God visits upon the children.
II. Their case determined by the divine oracle. Moses did not presume to give judgment himself, because, though their pretensions seemed just and reasonable, yet his express orders were to divide the land among those that were numbered, who were the males only; he therefore brings their cause before the Lord, and waits for his decision (Num 27:5), and God himself gives the judgment upon it. He takes cognizance of the affairs, not only of nations, but of private families, and orders them in judgment, according to the counsel of his own will. 1. The petition is granted (Num 27:7): They speak right, give them a possession. Those that seek an inheritance in the land of promise shall have what they seek, and other things shall be added to them. These are claims which God will countenance and crown. 2. The point is settled for all future occasions. These daughters of Zelophehad consulted, not only their own comfort and the credit of their family, but the honour and happiness of their sex likewise; for on this particular occasion a general law was made that, in case a man had no son, his estate should go to his daughters (Num 27:8); not to the eldest, as the eldest son, but to them all in copartnership, share and share alike. Those that in such a case deprive their daughters of their right, purely to keep up the name of their family, unless a valuable consideration be allowed them, may make the entail of their lands surer than the entail of a blessing with them. Further directions are given for the disposal of inheritances, Num 27:9-11. "If a man have no issue at all, his estate shall go to his brethren; if no brethren, then to his father's brethren; and, if there be no such, then to his next kinsman." With this the rules of our law exactly agree: and though the Jewish doctors here will have it understood that if a man have no children his estate shall go to his father, if living, before his brethren, yet there is nothing of that in the law, and our common law has an express rule against it, That an estate cannot ascend lineally; so that if a person purchase lands in fee-simple, and die without issue in the life-time of his father, his father cannot be his heir. See how God makes heirs, and in his disposal we must acquiesce.
Continue studying Numbers 27:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Numbers 27:7 marks a pivotal divine decree, directly affirming the righteous and just petition of Zelophehad's daughters. This verse establishes a crucial legal precedent within Mosaic Law, ensuring that daughters without brothers could inherit their father's property in the Promised Land. It powerfully demonstrates God's unwavering commitment to justice and equity, His profound attentiveness to the pleas of the vulnerable, and the dynamic, responsive nature of His covenantal law, which can be clarified and expanded to ensure fair and compassionate outcomes for all His people.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The passage employs several significant literary devices that amplify its theological and legal weight. Divine Fiat is paramount, as God's direct and immediate pronouncement ("speak right," "thou shalt surely give") serves as the ultimate authority, bypassing human deliberation and establishing a new legal standard. This highlights God's sovereignty and His active, personal involvement in the legal and social structures of His people. The narrative also functions as a Legal Precedent, setting a new and enduring standard for inheritance law within Israel. This specific case becomes a foundational ruling, demonstrating the dynamic and adaptable nature of Mosaic Law and its capacity to expand under divine guidance to address unforeseen circumstances and ensure justice. Furthermore, there is a clear element of Narrative Resolution, as the problem posed by the daughters' unique situation is swiftly and justly resolved by divine intervention, reinforcing the theme of God's perfect justice and responsiveness. The Repetition of "inheritance" (נַחֲלָה, naḥălâ) throughout the chapter, and particularly in this verse, emphasizes its profound significance—not just as property, but as a sacred, covenantal blessing and a tangible marker of identity and belonging within the Promised Land.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Numbers 27:7 profoundly illustrates God's character as a just and compassionate Lawgiver who is intimately attentive to the cries of His people, especially the vulnerable and those whose rights might be overlooked by existing customs. This ruling demonstrates that divine law, while foundational and eternal in its principles, is not static or rigidly applied without consideration for equity; rather, it possesses an inherent capacity for clarification and expansion to ensure justice and uphold the spirit of compassion. It underscores that God's concern for the well-being and rightful inheritance of every individual within His covenant community transcends human traditions and patriarchal norms. This incident serves as a powerful testament to God's commitment to maintaining family lines and ensuring that no one is unjustly disinherited from the blessings of the Promised Land, which symbolized their identity, security, and future in Him.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The divine ruling concerning Zelophehad's daughters offers timeless and profound lessons for contemporary believers, calling us to cultivate a heart for justice that mirrors God's own character. We are encouraged to actively seek out and speak up for the marginalized, the overlooked, and those whose rights or dignity may be diminished by societal norms, cultural traditions, or even rigid interpretations of religious law. This narrative reminds us that God is deeply concerned with the equitable treatment of all people, regardless of their social standing, gender, or traditional roles. It challenges us to critically examine our own communities, churches, and societal structures for areas where justice might be lacking and to courageously advocate for fair, compassionate, and redemptive solutions. Furthermore, this passage fosters a profound trust in God's ultimate wisdom, which transcends human limitations and provides clarity even in the most complex and unprecedented situations. When faced with moral dilemmas or seeking righteous paths, we are invited to bring our concerns and petitions before the Lord, confident that He listens, cares, and will guide us toward what is truly "right" in His eyes, ensuring that His kingdom principles of equity, love, and righteousness prevail.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Who were Zelophehad's daughters, and why was their case so significant?
Answer: Zelophehad's daughters were Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah, from the tribe of Manasseh. Their case was significant because their father had died without male heirs, which, according to prevailing customs and the initial framework for land distribution, meant his family line would lose its portion of the Promised Land. They boldly approached Moses, Eleazar, and the tribal leaders, petitioning for their father's inheritance to be passed to them instead. Their petition highlighted a gap in the existing inheritance laws and challenged the patriarchal norm, leading to a direct divine ruling from God in Numbers 27:7 that established a new legal precedent for female inheritance in the absence of sons. This ruling ensured that no family line would be unjustly disinherited and underscored God's commitment to justice and the preservation of family identity within the covenant community.
Why was land inheritance so crucial for the Israelites?
Answer: Land inheritance was profoundly crucial for the Israelites for several interconnected reasons. Firstly, it was the tangible fulfillment of God's covenant promise to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob that their descendants would possess the land of Canaan (e.g., Genesis 12:7). It represented God's faithfulness, their identity as His chosen people, and the physical manifestation of His blessing. Secondly, land was the primary source of livelihood, economic security, and social status in an agrarian society. Thirdly, it was inextricably linked to tribal and familial identity; each family's portion of land was their permanent legacy, ensuring the continuity of their name and place within the nation of Israel. Losing one's inheritance meant the potential erasure of one's family line from the historical and spiritual record of the covenant people. The laws surrounding inheritance, including the one established in Numbers 27:7, were designed to preserve this vital connection to the land and the covenant.
Did this ruling apply to all women, or were there further regulations?
Answer: The ruling in Numbers 27:7 established the foundational principle that daughters could inherit in the absence of sons, thereby correcting a potential injustice. However, a further regulation was indeed introduced in Numbers chapter 36 to address a potential complication arising from this new law. If a daughter inherited land and then married someone from another tribe, her inheritance would effectively transfer to that new tribe, potentially diminishing the original tribe's allotted portion and disrupting the divinely ordained tribal boundaries for land distribution. To prevent this, Numbers 36:6-9 stipulated that daughters who inherited land must marry within their own tribe and clan. This ensured that the land remained within the original tribal inheritance, balancing the rights of the daughters with the preservation of tribal land boundaries and the integrity of the original land distribution that God had established.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The story of Zelophehad's daughters and God's just decree in Numbers 27:7 finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. Just as these daughters sought to preserve their father's name and secure their earthly inheritance in the Promised Land, Christ came to secure for us an eternal, imperishable inheritance (as promised in 1 Peter 1:3-4). The earthly land of Canaan, though a precious gift and a tangible blessing, was but a shadow of the heavenly kingdom and the spiritual inheritance we receive through Christ (as richly described in Ephesians 1:11-14). God's attentiveness to the plea of the vulnerable daughters foreshadows Christ's compassionate ministry, where He consistently championed the marginalized, the outcast, and those overlooked or oppressed by society's norms and religious traditions (see Luke 4:18-19). Through His sacrificial death and glorious resurrection, Christ, the ultimate "Son" and heir of all things (as declared in Hebrews 1:2), ensures that all who believe in Him, whether male or female, Jew or Gentile, are adopted into God's family and become co-heirs with Him (as proclaimed in Romans 8:17 and Galatians 3:28-29). He secures for us not merely a plot of land, but eternal life, reconciliation with God, and a place in the new heavens and new earth (revealed in Revelation 21:1-4), ensuring that our spiritual "name" and inheritance in God's eternal family will never be blotted out.