Leviticus 1:14

Translation
King James Version
And if the burnt sacrifice for his offering to the LORD be of fowls, then he shall bring his offering of turtledoves, or of young pigeons.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And if the burnt sacrifice H5930 for his offering H7133 to the LORD H3068 be of fowls H5775, then he shall bring H7126 his offering H7133 of turtledoves H8449, or of young H1121 pigeons H3123.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"'If his offering to ADONAI is a burnt offering of birds, he must offer a dove or a young pigeon.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
If, instead, one’s offering to the LORD is a burnt offering of birds, he is to present a turtledove or a young pigeon.
Ask
American Standard Version
And if his oblation to Jehovah be a burnt-offering of birds, then he shall offer his oblation of turtle-doves, or of young pigeons.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
“‘If his offering to the LORD is a burnt offering of birds, then he shall offer his offering of turtledoves, or of young pigeons.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And if his sacrifice be a burnt offring to the Lord of ye foules, then he shall offer his sacrifice of the turtle doues, or of the yong pigeons.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`And if his offering is a burnt-offering out of the fowl to Jehovah, than he hath brought near his offering out of the turtle-doves or out of the young pigeons,
Ask
See also
Leviticus 5:7Luke 2:24Leviticus 12:8Matthew 11:29Hebrews 7:262 Corinthians 8:12Genesis 15:9
In the KJVVerse 2,760 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Leviticus 1:14 provides a compassionate provision within the laws of the burnt offering, specifying that those who could not afford larger animals could present an offering of fowls. This instruction underscores God's profound grace and inclusive nature, ensuring that individuals from all economic strata in ancient Israel had a means to participate in the sacrificial system, express complete dedication to the Lord, and seek atonement. It highlights that access to worship and spiritual reconciliation was universally available, valuing the worshiper's heart above the material cost of the sacrifice.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Leviticus 1 meticulously outlines the regulations for the burnt offering, known in Hebrew as the ‘olah, which uniquely involved the complete consumption of the animal on the altar, symbolizing total dedication and surrender to God. The chapter systematically presents a hierarchy of acceptable animals, moving from the most costly to the most accessible. It begins with detailed instructions for offerings of cattle in Leviticus 1:3-9, followed by provisions for flocks (sheep or goats) in Leviticus 1:10-13. Leviticus 1:14 then concludes this progression by introducing the option for fowls, specifically turtledoves or young pigeons, thereby completing the spectrum of permissible animals and emphatically demonstrating God's desire for universal participation in this foundational act of worship.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israelite society, significant economic disparities existed, making it impossible for every family to own or afford large livestock like cattle or sheep. However, turtledoves and young pigeons were abundant, relatively inexpensive, and easily obtainable, whether through keeping them or catching them. By explicitly allowing these smaller, more affordable birds, God ensured that economic hardship would not be a barrier to fulfilling the requirements of the burnt offering and approaching Him in worship. This divine accommodation highlights the inclusive nature of the Mosaic Law, emphasizing that the sacrificial system was designed for the entire community, not just the affluent. The burnt offering itself was a pivotal act of worship, signifying complete devotion and serving as a means of propitiation for sin, as indicated in Leviticus 1:4. This provision powerfully illustrates God's compassionate understanding of human circumstances and His unwavering desire for all His people to draw near to Him in purity and dedication.
  • Key Themes: Leviticus 1:14 contributes significantly to several key themes within the book of Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Foremost among these is Divine Inclusivity, demonstrating God's desire for all members of the covenant community, regardless of their economic standing, to have access to worship and atonement. This verse underscores God's Compassion and Accommodation, as He provides practical means for the poor to participate fully in the sacred rituals. It also reinforces the theme of Meticulousness in Worship, as God specifies the exact types of birds, emphasizing the importance of precise obedience in sacred matters. Furthermore, the verse highlights the Sufficiency of God's Provision, teaching that the efficacy of the sacrifice did not depend on the material value of the animal but on God's gracious acceptance and the worshiper's sincere heart. This principle is foundational to understanding the nature of atonement and God's relationship with His people, as seen throughout the sacrificial laws detailed in Leviticus 1.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Burnt sacrifice (Hebrew, ‘ôlâh', H5930): This term refers to a "holocaust (as going up in smoke)." It denotes an offering entirely consumed by fire on the altar, with its smoke ascending to God. This complete consumption symbolized total dedication, surrender, and the entire giving over of the worshiper and their offering to the Lord, signifying a "sweet savor" to God, as mentioned in Leviticus 1:9.
  • Fowls (Hebrew, ʻôwph', H5775): This word means "a bird (as covered with feathers, or rather as covering with wings), often collectively." It serves as a general category for birds, which is then immediately specified in the latter part of the verse. Its use here indicates the broad allowance for avian offerings, which is then narrowed to ensure proper adherence to the divine command.
  • Turtledoves (Hebrew, tôwr'), or of young (Hebrew, bên'), pigeons (Hebrew, yôwnâh', H8449): And H3123 respectively, these specific terms identify the permissible birds. Tôwr refers to a "ring-dove," while yôwnâh means "a dove (apparently from the warmth of their mating)," and bên signifies "a son" or "young one." The combination "young pigeons" (literally "sons of pigeons") specifies immature birds. This precise naming underscores God's meticulous instructions for worship and ensures that the offering remained accessible and affordable for the poorest members of the community, as these birds were common and inexpensive.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And if the burnt sacrifice for his offering to the LORD [be] of fowls": This clause introduces a specific alternative provision within the burnt offering law, explicitly designed for individuals who could not afford larger, more expensive animals like cattle or sheep. It establishes the general category of "fowls" as an acceptable offering, demonstrating God's inclusive and compassionate nature in the sacrificial system. This highlights that the path to atonement was not limited by economic status.
  • "then he shall bring his offering of turtledoves, or of young pigeons": This part of the verse precisely specifies the exact types of birds permitted for the burnt offering: turtledoves or young pigeons. The meticulous detail in naming these particular birds underscores the divine requirement for exact obedience and purity in worship. Simultaneously, it reaffirms the accessibility of the offering, as these birds were common and affordable, ensuring that all Israelites, regardless of their financial means, could fulfill the requirements of the law and participate in the sacred act of atonement.

Literary Devices

Leviticus 1:14 effectively employs Divine Accommodation and Specificity as central literary devices. The progression of acceptable burnt offerings throughout Leviticus 1, from large cattle to smaller flocks and finally to the most humble fowls, exemplifies Divine Accommodation. This shows God's law being thoughtfully tailored to the diverse economic realities and capacities of His people, ensuring that no one is excluded from the means of atonement due to financial hardship. This gradient of sacrifices powerfully communicates God's compassionate and inclusive character. Concurrently, the precise naming of "turtledoves, or of young pigeons" demonstrates Specificity, a hallmark of the Mosaic Law. This meticulous detail underscores the paramount importance of exact adherence to divine commands in worship, fostering order, purity, and reverence in the sacred rituals. The interplay between broad accessibility and precise requirements reveals a God who is both mercifully accommodating and absolutely holy in His expectations.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Leviticus 1:14 profoundly illustrates God's divine inclusivity and His valuing of the worshiper's sincere heart over the material cost of the offering. The allowance for the poorest to bring a burnt offering of fowls demonstrates that the path to atonement and reconciliation with God was open to all, irrespective of their economic standing. This principle emphasizes that the spiritual efficacy of the sacrifice was not diminished by the size or monetary value of the animal, but rested solely on God's gracious provision and the worshiper's genuine faith and obedience. It teaches us that God desires authentic devotion and a repentant heart, making a way for all to approach Him and receive His grace. This foreshadows the New Covenant reality where access to God is universal through faith in Christ, not through material offerings.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Leviticus 1:14 offers enduring lessons for believers today, transcending the specific rituals of the Old Covenant. It serves as a powerful reminder that God's desire for relationship and reconciliation is universal, extending to every individual regardless of their social standing, financial capacity, or perceived abilities. The underlying principle is that our offerings—whether of time, talent, or treasure—are measured not by their grand scale or monetary value, but by the sincerity, devotion, and sacrificial heart with which they are given. This verse encourages us to understand that true worship is accessible to all who genuinely seek God, and that our "best" offering, no matter how humble it may seem, is profoundly valued by Him when offered in faith and obedience. It challenges us to examine our own hearts, ensuring that our acts of worship and service are motivated by pure love and a fervent desire to honor God, rather than by external appearances, human comparisons, or a sense of inadequacy. We are called to give what we have, with a willing spirit, knowing that God sees and honors the heart behind the gift.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Leviticus 1:14 challenge our modern assumptions about what constitutes a "valuable" offering or contribution to God's work?
  • In what ways might we be tempted to think our offerings (time, talent, resources) are too small or insignificant for God to use? How does this verse correct that thinking?
  • How can the principle of divine inclusivity, as seen in this verse, inform our approach to ministry and outreach in our communities today, ensuring that no one feels excluded from God's grace or service?

FAQ

Why did God allow different animals for the burnt offering, ranging from cattle to fowls?

Answer: God allowed different animals for the burnt offering to ensure that the sacrificial system was accessible to all Israelites, regardless of their economic status. The progression from costly cattle to more affordable sheep or goats, and finally to inexpensive turtledoves or young pigeons, demonstrates God's compassionate provision. This ensured that even the poorest members of the community could participate in the essential act of seeking atonement and expressing complete dedication to the Lord, highlighting that God values the worshiper's heart and obedience more than the material value of the sacrifice. This principle underscores God's desire for universal participation in worship.

What was the significance of offering turtledoves or young pigeons specifically?

Answer: Turtledoves and young pigeons were significant because they were common, readily available, and the most affordable animals for sacrifice in ancient Israel. Their specific mention underscores God's meticulous attention to detail in His commands for worship, ensuring purity and order in the ritual. Furthermore, their inclusion highlights God's divine accommodation, making a way for every individual, including the poor, to fulfill the requirements of the law and access the means of atonement. This demonstrates that God's plan for reconciliation was truly inclusive and considerate of all His people's circumstances.

Did the size of the offering affect the degree of atonement received by the worshiper?

Answer: No, the size or economic value of the animal offered did not affect the degree of atonement received. The purpose of the burnt offering, regardless of whether it was a bull, a lamb, or a bird, remained consistent: to make atonement for the worshiper (Leviticus 1:4). God's acceptance of the sacrifice was based on the worshiper's faith, obedience, and sincere heart, not on the monetary cost of the animal. This principle underscores God's impartiality and His desire for all to draw near to Him through the prescribed means, emphasizing that His grace is freely given to those who approach Him in the prescribed way.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Leviticus 1:14, with its profound emphasis on divine inclusivity and universally accessible atonement through the humble burnt offering of fowls, serves as a powerful foreshadowing of the ultimate, perfectly accessible sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Just as the modest offering of a turtledove provided full atonement for the poor Israelite, Christ's singular, perfect sacrifice on the cross provides complete and sufficient atonement for all humanity, regardless of their status, wealth, or background. He is the true and final "burnt offering," whose entire life, death, and resurrection constituted a complete surrender and a "sweet savor" to God, perfectly fulfilling every requirement of the law. The Old Testament sacrifices, including the humble bird, pointed to the coming Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Through His shed blood, Jesus became the universally accessible means of justification for all who believe, demonstrating that salvation is not earned by works or wealth, but is a free gift of God's grace, offered to "whoever believes in Him" (John 3:16). His sacrifice, unlike the temporary animal offerings, is eternally effective, providing a perfect and lasting reconciliation, making us righteous before God (2 Corinthians 5:21). Thus, the spirit of accessibility and full atonement, hinted at in the law of the fowl offering, finds its glorious and complete fulfillment in Christ, our all-sufficient sacrifice, who entered the heavenly sanctuary "once for all" (Hebrews 9:11-14).

Copy as

Commentary on Leviticus 1 verses 10–17

Here we have the laws concerning the burnt-offerings, which were of the flock or of the fowls. Those of the middle rank, that could not well afford to offer a bullock, would bring a sheep or a goat; and those that were not able to do that should be accepted of God if they brought a turtle-dove or a pigeon. For God, in his law and in his gospel, as well as in his providence, considers the poor. It is observable that those creatures were chosen for sacrifice which were most mild and gentle, harmless and inoffensive, to typify the innocence and meekness that were in Christ, and to teach the innocence and meekness that should be in Christians. Directions are here given, 1. Concerning the burnt-offerings of the flock, Lev 1:10. The method of managing these is much the same with that of the bullocks; only it is ordered here that the sacrifice should be killed on the side of the altar northward, which, though mentioned here only, was probably to be observed concerning the former, and other sacrifices. Perhaps on that side of the altar there was the largest vacant space, and room for the priests to turn them in. It was of old observed that fair weather comes out of the north, and that the north wind drives away rain; and by these sacrifices the storms of God's wrath are scattered, and the light of God's countenance is obtained, which is more pleasant than the brightest fairest weather. 2. Concerning those of the fowls. They must be either turtle-doves (and, if so, "they must be old turtles," say the Jews), or pigeons, and, if so, they must be young pigeons. What was most acceptable at men's tables must be brought to God's altar. In the offering of these fowls, (1.) The head must be wrung off, "quite off," say some; others think only pinched, so as to kill the bird, and yet leave the head hanging to the body. But it seems more likely that it was to be quite separated, for it was to be burnt first. (2.) The blood was to be wrung out at the side of the altar. (3.) The garbages with the feathers were to be thrown by upon the dunghill. (4.) The body was to be opened, sprinkled with salt, and then burnt upon the altar. "This sacrifice of birds," the Jews say, "was one of the most difficult services the priests had to do," to teach those that minister in holy things to be as solicitous for the salvation of the poor as for that of the rich, and that the services of the poor are as acceptable to God, if they come from an upright heart, as the services of the rich, for he accepts according to what a man hath, and not according to what he hath not, Co2 8:12. The poor man's turtle-doves, or young pigeons, are here said to be an offering of a sweet-smelling savour, as much as that of an ox or bullock that hath horns or hoofs. Yet, after all, to love God with all our heart, and to love our neighbour as ourselves, is better than all burnt-offerings and sacrifices, Mar 12:33.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 10–17. Public domain.
Copy as
BedeAD 735
Homilies on the Gospels 1.18
In very many ceremonies of the law one who needed to be cleansed was ordered to be cleansed by [offering] these [birds]. A pigeon indicates simplicity and a turtledove indicates chastity, for a pigeon is a lover of simplicity and a turtledove is a lover of chastity—so that if by chance one loses its mate it will not subsequently seek another.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Leviticus 1:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.