Skip to content

Judges 14:14

“The Wedding Feast and the Riddle”Judges 14:10–14

King James Version
And he said unto them, Out of the eater came forth meat, and out of the strong came forth sweetness. And they could not in three days expound the riddle.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
And he said H559 unto them, Out of the eater H398 came forth H3318 meat H3978, and out of the strong H5794 came forth H3318 sweetness H4966. And they could H3201 not in three H7969 days H3117 expound H5046 the riddle H2420.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
So he said to them: “Out of the eater came something to eat, and out of the strong came something sweet.” For three days they were unable to explain the riddle.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
And he said unto them, Out of the eater came forth food, And out of the strong came forth sweetness. And they could not in three days declare the riddle.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
He said to them, “Out of the eater came out food. Out of the strong came out sweetness.” They couldn’t in three days declare the riddle.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
And he sayd vnto them, Out of the eater came meate, and out of the strong came sweetenesse: and they could not in three dayes expound the riddle.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
And he saith to them: `Out of the eater came forth meat, And out of the strong came forth sweetness;' and they were not able to declare the riddle in three days.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
14 Hebrew words
  1. וַיֹּאמֶרvai·Yo·merand he saidH559Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-ConsecImperf-3msVerb Qal Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוַandיֹּאמֶרhe said
  2. לָהֶםla·Hemto [the] themPrep-l ¦ 3mpSuffix Personal 3rd Plural Masculineלָto [the]הֶםthem
  3. מֵהָאֹכֵלme·ha·'o·Khelfrom the eaterH398Prep-m ¦ Art ¦ V-Qal-Prtcpl-msVerb Qal Participle Singular Masculine Absoluteמֵfromהָtheאֹכֵלeater
  4. יָצָאya·Tza'it came outH3318V-Qal-Perf-3msVerb Qal Perfect 3rd Singular Masculine
  5. מַאֲכָלma·'a·KhalfoodH3978N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  6. וּמֵעַזu·me·'Azand from a strong [one]H5794Conj-w ¦ Prep-m ¦ Adj-msAdjective Singular Masculine Absoluteוּandמֵfromעַזa strong [one]
  7. יָצָאya·Tza'it came outH3318V-Qal-Perf-3msVerb Qal Perfect 3rd Singular Masculine
  8. מָתוֹקma·Toka sweet [thing]H4966Adj-msAdjective Singular Masculine Absolute
  9. וְלֹאve·Lo'and notH3808Conj-w ¦ NegParticle Negativeוְandלֹאnot
  10. יָכְלוּya·khe·Luthey were ableH3201V-Qal-Perf-3cpVerb Qal Perfect 3rd Plural common gender
  11. לְהַגִּידle·ha·Gidto tellH5046Prep-l ¦ V-Hiphil-InfVerb Hiphil Infinitive Constructלְtoהַגִּידtell
  12. הַחִידָהha·chi·Dahthe riddleH2420Art ¦ N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absoluteהַtheחִידָהriddle
  13. שְׁלֹשֶׁתshe·Lo·shetthreeH7969N-cscNoun Singular common gender Construct
  14. יָמִיםya·MimdaysH3117N-mpNoun Plural Masculine Absolute
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation differences
Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 6,924 of 31,102 · 22.3%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Samson’s riddle speaks of food from the eater and sweetness from the strong, meaning the honey he found in the lion he had killed, and for three days the Philistines are unable to explain it.

“And he said unto them,”

Samson speaks to the thirty at the feast, and the contest begins.

“Out of the eater came forth meat,”

The eater (ʼâkal, to eat or devour) is the lion, and the “meat” is food, the honey found in its carcass (Judges 14:5–9).

“and out of the strong came forth sweetness.”

The second line says the same thing again in other words. The fierce lion (ʻaz) yields honey (mâthôwq, sweet).

“And they could not in three days expound the riddle.”

The answer depended on an experience that belonged to Samson alone, so three days of thinking brought the thirty no closer.

Passage studyJudges 14:10–14

Samson’s Riddle at the Wedding Feast

10So his father went down unto the woman: and Samson made there a feast; for so used the young men to do. 11And it came to pass, when they saw him, that they brought thirty companions to be with him. 12And Samson said unto them, I will now put forth a riddle unto you: if ye can certainly declare it me within the seven days of the feast, and find it out, then I will give you thirty sheets and thirty change of garments: 13But if ye cannot declare it me, then shall ye give me thirty sheets and thirty change of garments. And they said unto him, Put forth thy riddle, that we may hear it. 14And he said unto them, Out of the eater came forth meat, and out of the strong came forth sweetness. And they could not in three days expound the riddle.

Summary

Samson’s father goes down to Timnath, and Samson gives the wedding feast that custom expected of a bridegroom. The Philistines bring thirty men to keep him company, and Samson sets them a riddle with a costly wager on it: thirty linen sheets and thirty changes of clothing. The riddle comes from the lion he killed and the honey he later found in its carcass, a secret only he holds, and after three days the thirty are still stumped. Behind the feast and the game stands what the chapter has already told us, that the LORD was seeking an occasion against the Philistines.

How the wedding came about

Samson was a Nazirite from birth, set apart to God as the one who would begin to deliver Israel from the Philistines (Judges 13:5). As a grown man he saw a Philistine woman in Timnath and told his parents, “Get her for me; for she pleaseth me well” (Judges 14:3). They objected, and the writer then tells us what was hidden from them: “it was of the LORD, that he sought an occasion against the Philistines” (Judges 14:4). The Philistines were the power oppressing Israel in those days, and the LORD meant to use this marriage to open a quarrel with them.

Verse 10 is the point where Samson’s wish becomes a formal marriage, and the feast is where the quarrel begins. The rest of Judges 14 runs from this table to threats, betrayal and bloodshed.

Was it a sin for Samson to marry a Philistine?

The law forbade Israel to marry into the idol-worshipping nations, so that their hearts would stay with the LORD (Deuteronomy 7:3–4), and Samson’s choice went against that command. Judges 14:4 says in the same breath that the matter was of the LORD. Both are true together. The self-will is Samson’s own, and God, who rules over history, took that flawed choice and used it to begin setting his people free. Scripture says this of him elsewhere: a man’s heart holds many plans, and it is the counsel of the LORD that stands (Proverbs 19:21), and all things work together for good to them that love God (Romans 8:28). The command still stood, and the trouble that fills the rest of Samson’s story shows what his choices cost him.

The father goes down and Samson makes a feast

Marriage in Israel was a matter between families, and the father (ʼâb), here Manoah, had the leading part in arranging or approving it, as when Abraham charged his servant to take a wife for Isaac. His going down to the woman is that formal step, which would usually include agreeing a bride price and the terms of the marriage. The verb yârad simply means to go down, and it fits the ground, since Timnath likely lay lower than Samson’s home at Zorah.

Manoah had opposed this marriage, and people ask why he went at all. Custom gave the father this role, and his presence made the proceedings proper. Samson had also made his mind plain, and a father’s duty may have carried Manoah along where his heart held back. Above both stood the LORD’s purpose, which was moving through the son’s desire and the father’s reluctant consent alike.

Samson then “made there a feast”. The word mishteh means a feast or banquet, and it can also mean drinking, so this was a glad social celebration with food and drink. It announced the marriage publicly and bound the two families and their communities together. Laban did the same for Jacob when he gathered all the men of the place and made a feast, and Jacob’s wedding also shows that such a celebration ran for a week (Genesis 29:27), which verse 12 confirms here with “the seven days of the feast”.

“For so used the young men to do” explains that Samson was doing what any bridegroom of his day did. The verb ʻâsâh is the plain, broad word for doing or making, and the sentence as a whole tells us this was the regular practice.

There is a quiet tension in the scene. Samson was a Nazirite, set apart from other men, and here he sits at a feast in a Philistine town, keeping the customs of everyone around him. His whole story carries this pull between a consecrated calling and a life sunk deep among the Philistines.

Who were the thirty companions?

They were Philistine men of Timnath, brought to attend Samson through the week of the feast. A bridegroom was commonly accompanied by a band of young men, the friends of the bridegroom, who shared the festivities, kept him company and joined in games and riddles. Thirty is a large party and, on its face, an honour.

“When they saw him” uses râʼâh, the ordinary verb for seeing, and “they” are the Philistines of the place, most likely the bride’s family and neighbours. “Brought” is lâqach, a very broad verb whose basic sense is to take. The Philistines took thirty men and set them beside Samson, so these were companions chosen for him by his hosts. Given the hostility between the two peoples, the thirty may well have been meant to keep an eye on an Israelite in their town as well as to honour him, though the verse leaves their motive unstated.

The word for companion, mêrêaʻ, means a friend, and it turns bitter as the story goes on. Samson sits surrounded by thirty friends and is alone among them, the one Israelite at a Philistine table. Within days they will threaten his wife to get the answer to the riddle out of her (Judges 14:15–18), which shows where their loyalty lay. This is the first of the betrayals in Samson’s life, and the worst comes with Delilah in Judges 16. Paul’s warning against being “unequally yoked” (2 Corinthians 6:14) describes the danger Samson walked into, a close bond with people whose allegiance ran against his own.

The riddle and the wager

Riddles were a favourite entertainment at feasts in Israel and among the neighbouring nations, and a test of wit and wisdom, as when the queen of Sheba came to prove Solomon with hard questions. Samson opens the contest himself and sets its terms. “Put forth” is the verb chûwd, which at root means to tie a knot and so to propound a riddle. The noun chîydâh comes from it and means a puzzle or dark saying, knotted on purpose so that it takes ingenuity to untie.

On paper the terms are even. If the thirty can “declare” the answer (nâgad, to make known or explain) within the seven days of the feast, and truly find it out, Samson owes them thirty sheets and thirty change of garments. If they fail, they owe him the same. A çâdîyn is a fine linen garment, worn as a wrap or an undergarment, and linen was costly because of the labour of growing flax and weaving it. chălîyphâh means a change, from a root for alternating, and beged is the ordinary word for clothes, so a “change of garments” is a fresh set of clothing, most likely the better kind kept for special occasions. In a farming society where clothing was made by hand and counted as wealth, sixty such pieces were a heavy stake for either side.

In fact the contest was uneven, because the riddle rested on something only Samson had seen. The thirty accept eagerly and with one voice: “Put forth thy riddle, that we may hear it.” They either trusted their wits or underrated him, and their words bound them to the wager.

The scene shows us Samson as he was. He is clever, confident and reckless, and he uses his wit the way he uses his strength, on his own terms and for his own satisfaction. The size of the stake is what later drives the thirty to threats and deceit, and Samson’s answer to that is violence, the loss of his wife and a widening feud (Judges 14:19–20, Judges 15:1–8). The proverb about the man who digs a pit and falls into it (Proverbs 26:27) and Paul’s word that a man reaps what he sows (Galatians 6:7) both come true at this feast. Cunning is a poor substitute for the wisdom God gives to those who ask him (James 1:5).

What is the answer to Samson’s riddle?

The answer is a lion and honey. On an earlier journey to Timnath a young lion came against Samson, and with the Spirit of the LORD upon him he tore it apart with his bare hands. Coming back later he found a swarm of bees and honey in the carcass, and he kept the whole matter secret, even from his parents (Judges 14:5–9).

The riddle turns that secret into two matched lines. “The eater” is the lion, named by the verb ʼâkal, to eat or devour, and the “meat” that came out of it (ma’akal, food, something eaten) is the honey. “The strong” is the lion again, ʻaz, fierce and mighty, and the “sweetness”, mâthôwq, is the honey again. Each line holds a reversal: the devourer gives food, and the fierce one gives something pleasant to taste.

The thirty “could not in three days expound the riddle”. Their failure was certain, because the answer lay in an event only Samson had witnessed, beyond the reach of wit. Their frustration is what turns them, in the next verses, against Samson’s wife.

People ask why Samson set a riddle so unfair. Riddles belonged at such feasts, and Samson had a quick wit and was glad to show it over these Philistines, with some pride in the mix. Behind his motives stood the LORD’s, for this contest became the occasion against the Philistines that Judges 14:4 speaks of.

Was the honey unclean for Samson?

By the law it was. A lion is among the unclean beasts that go upon their paws, and whoever touches the carcass of one is unclean (Leviticus 11:27). A Nazirite carried a further vow to keep away from the dead (Numbers 6:6). Samson reached into the carcass anyway. He was a man empowered by God’s Spirit and careless of God’s law at the same time, and God still used him.

What the riddle shows of God’s ways

Samson meant his riddle as a game, and it says something true about the LORD. God brings good out of evil, life out of death and provision out of danger. Joseph told his brothers that what they meant for evil God meant for good (Genesis 50:20). The Lord told Paul that his strength is made perfect in weakness (2 Corinthians 12:9). Jesus said that a grain of wheat falls into the ground and dies, and then bears much fruit (John 12:24). Samson’s own life is a case of it, a turbulent and compromised man through whom God began to deliver Israel.

The riddle also shows the limits of human wisdom. Thirty men with days to think got nowhere, because the answer had to be told to them by the one who knew. God’s ways are like that. We know them because he has made them known.

Christ, the deliverer Samson foreshadows

Samson was set apart from birth to deliver his people, and in that he points ahead to Jesus. The likeness is partial, for Samson’s life was marked by desire and compromise, while Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), finished his Father’s work in sinless obedience.

Samson sat among companions who would turn on him. Jesus was betrayed by Judas, one of his own chosen disciples, for thirty pieces of silver (Matthew 26:14–16), and the rest forsook him at his arrest (Matthew 26:56). Samson’s wedding was troubled and ended in conflict. Christ loved the church and gave himself for her, to present her to himself holy and spotless (Ephesians 5:25–27), and the feast at Timnath is a faint shadow of the marriage supper of the Lamb (Revelation 19:7–9).

Samson’s riddle was meant to trap his hearers. In Christ “are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:3), and his parables open the kingdom to those with ears to hear while staying closed to hardened hearts (Mark 4:11–12). The mystery hidden in God through the ages is now made known in him (Ephesians 3:9–10), for Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God (1 Corinthians 1:24), and his truth makes us free (John 8:32). The prize at Timnath was sixty pieces of clothing. God clothes his people with “the garments of salvation” and “the robe of righteousness” (Isaiah 61:10), a gift that cost Christ his life, given while we were yet sinners (Romans 5:8).

The riddle itself reads most deeply at the cross. Sin is the eater, and its wages is death (Romans 6:23). Death looked to have swallowed Christ, and out of his death came the food of eternal life and the sweetness of salvation. He is the bread of life (John 6:35) and the giver of living water (John 7:38), and what looked like weakness on the cross was stronger than men (1 Corinthians 1:25). From the greatest defeat came the greatest victory.

Honey from the lion

The passage gives us a God whose purpose holds through a wedding his law forbade, a wager made in pride and a riddle built on a broken vow. Samson’s failures were real, and so was the deliverance God began through him. God’s plan rests on his own faithfulness, and he is able to redeem our missteps and weave them into his work. That is a reason for humility about our choices and for trust in his.

It also lets us look differently at the lions in our own lives. The trial that looked ready to devour us may be the place where God has stored something sweet, and believers often find afterwards that it was so. The thirty companions leave a sober word beside that comfort. Company at a feast can hide a divided loyalty, and the wisdom to choose our closest ties well is a gift God gives.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Judges 14:10–20. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 11 verses
Passage under commentJudges 14:10–20
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here an account of Samson's wedding feast and the occasion it gave him to fall foul upon the Philistines.

I.Samson conformed to the custom of the country in making a festival of his nuptial solemnities, which continued seven days, Judges 14:10.

Though he was a Nazarite, he did not affect, in a thing of this nature, to be singular, but did as the young men used to do upon such occasions. It is no part of religion to go contrary to the innocent usages of the places where we live: nay, it is a reproach to religion when those who profess it give just occasion to others to call them covetous, sneaking, and morose. A good man should strive to make himself, in the best sense, a good companion.

II.His wife's relations paid him the accustomed respect of the place upon that occasion, and brought him thirty young men to keep him company during the solemnity, and to attend him as his grooms-men (Judges 14:11): When they saw him, what a comely man he was, and what an ingenuous graceful look he had, they brought him these to do him honour, and to improve by his conversation while he staid among them. Or, rather, when they saw him, what a strong stout man he was, they brought these, seemingly to be his companions, but really to be a guard upon him, or spies to observe him. Jealous enough they were of him, but would have been more so had they known of his victory over the lion, which therefore he had industriously concealed. The favours of Philistines have often some mischief or other designed in them.

III.Samson, to entertain the company, propounds a riddle to them, and lays a wager with them that they cannot find it out in seven days, Judges 14:12-14. The usage, it seems, was very ancient upon such occasions, when friends were together, to be innocently merry, not to spend all the time in dull eating and drinking, as bishop Patrick expresses it, or in other gratifications of sense, as music, dancing, or shows, but to propose questions, by which their learning and ingenuity might be tried and improved. This becomes men, wise men, that value themselves by their reason; but very unlike to it are the infamous and worse than brutish entertainments of this degenerate age, which send nothing round but the glass and the health, till reason is drowned, and wisdom sunk. Now,

1.Samson's riddle was his own invention, for it was his own achievement that gave occasion for it: Out of the eater came forth meat, and out of the strong came forth sweetness. Read my riddle, what is this? Beasts of prey do not yield meat for man, yet food came from the devourer; and those creatures that are strong when they are alive commonly smell strong and are every way offensive when they are dead, as horses, and yet out of the strong, or out of the bitter, so the Syriac and Arabic read it, came sweetness. If they had but so much sense as to consider what eater is most strong, and what meat is most sweet, they would have found out the riddle, and neither lions nor honey were such strangers to their country that the thoughts of them needed to be out of the way; and the solving of the riddle would have given him occasion to tell them the entertaining story on which it was founded. This riddle is applicable to many of the methods of divine providence and grace. When God, by an over-ruling providence, brings good out of evil to his church and people, - when that which threatened their ruin turns to their advantage, - when their enemies are made serviceable to them, and the wrath of men turns to God's praise, - then comes meat out of the eater and sweetness out of the strong. See Philippians 1:12.

2.His water was more considerable to him than to them, because he was one against thirty partners. It was not a wager laid upon God's providence, or upon the chance of a die or a card, but upon their ingenuity, and amounted to no more than an honorary recompence of wit and a disgrace upon stupidity.

IV.His companions, when they could not expound the riddle themselves, obliged his wife to get from him the exposition of it, Judges 14:15.

Whether they were really of a dull capacity, or whether under a particular infatuation at this time, it was strange that none of the thirty could in all this time stumble upon so plain a thing as that, What is sweeter than honey and what stronger than a lion? It should seem that in wit, as well as manners, they were barbarous - barbarous indeed to threaten the bride that, if she would not use means with the bridegroom to let them into the meaning of it, they would burn her and her father's house with fire. Could any thing be more brutish? It was base enough to turn a jest into earnest, and those were unworthy of conversation that would grow so outrageous rather than confess their ignorance and lose so small a wager; nor would it save their credit at all to tell the riddle when they were told it. It was yet more villainous to engage Samson's wife to be a traitor to her own husband, and to pretend a greater interest in her than he had. Now that she was married she must forget her own people. Yet most inhuman of all was it to threaten, if she could not prevail, to burn her and all her relations with fire, and all for fear of losing each of them the value of a shirt and a coat: Have you called us to take what we have? Those must never lay wagers that cannot lose more tamely and easily than thus.

V.His wife, by unreasonable importunity, obtains from him a key to his riddle.

It was on the seventh day, that is, the seventh day of the week (as Dr. Lightfoot conjectures), but the fourth day of the feast, that they solicited her to entice her husband (Judges 14:15), and she did it,

1.With great art and management (Judges 14:16), resolving not to believe he loved her, unless he would gratify her in this thing. She knew he could not bear to have his love questioned, and therefore, if any thing would work upon him, that would: "Thou dost but hate me, and lovest me not, if thou deniest me;" whereas he had much more reason to say, "Thou dost but hate me, and lovest me not, if thou insistest on it." And, that she might not make this the test of his affection, he assures her he had not told his own parents, notwithstanding the confidence he reposed in them. If this prevail not, she will try the powerful eloquence of tears: she wept before him the rest of the days of the feast, choosing rather to mar the mirth, as the bride's tears must needs do, than not gain her point, and oblige her countrymen, Judges 14:17.

2.With great success. At last, being quite wearied with her importunity, he told her what was the meaning of his riddle, and though we may suppose she promised secresy, and that if he would but let her know she would tell nobody, she immediately told it to the children of her people; nor could he expect better from a Philistine, especially when the interests of her country were ever so little concerned. See Micah 7:5, Micah 7:6. The riddle is at length unriddled (Judges 14:18): What is sweeter than honey, or a better meat? Proverbs 24:13. What is stronger than a lion, or a greater devourer? Samson generously owns they had won the wager, though he had good reason to dispute it, because they had not declared the riddle, as the bargain was (Judges 14:12), but it had been declared to them. But he only thought fit to tell them of it: If you had not ploughed with my heifer, made use of your interest with my wife, you would not have found out my riddle. Satan, in his temptations, could not do us the mischief he does if he did not plough with the heifer of our own corrupt nature.

VI.Samson pays his wager to these Philistines with the spoils of others of their countrymen, Judges 14:19.

He took this occasion to quarrel with the Philistines, went down to Ashkelon, one of their cities, where probably he knew there was some great festival observed at this time, to which many flocked, out of whom he picked out thirty, slew them, and took their clothes, and gave them to those that had expounded the riddle; so that, in balancing the account, it appeared that the Philistines were the losers, for one of the lives they lost was worth all the suits of clothes they won: the body is more than raiment. The Spirit of the Lord came upon him, both to authorize and to enable him to do this.

VII.This proves a good occasion of weaning Samson from his new relations.

He found how his companions had abused him and how his wife had betrayed him, and therefore his anger was kindled, Judges 14:19. Better be angry with Philistines than in love with them, because, when we join ourselves to them, we are most in danger of being ensnared by them. And, meeting with this ill usage among them, he went up to his father's house. It were well for us if the unkindnesses we meet with from the world, and our disappointments in it, had but this good effect upon us, to oblige us by faith and prayer to return to our heavenly Father's house and rest there. The inconveniences that occur in our way should make us love home and long to be there. No sooner had he gone than his wife was disposed of to another, Judges 14:20. Instead of begging his pardon for the wrong she had done him, when he justly signified his resentment of it only by withdrawing in displeasure for a time, she immediately marries him that was the chief of the guests, the friend of the bridegroom, whom perhaps she loved too well, and was too willing to oblige, when she got her husband to tell her the riddle. See how little confidence is to be put in man, when those may prove our enemies whom we have used as our friends.

Historical interpretation

Historical reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 397–542
Post-Nicene
400500

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

And perhaps this was not only a prodigy of valour, but also a mystery of wisdom, an utterance of prophecy. For it does not seem to have been without a purpose that, as he was going to his marriage, a roaring lion met him, which he tore asunder with his hands, in whose body, when about to enjoy the wished-for wedlock, he found a swarm of bees, and took honey from its mouth, which he gave to his father and mother to eat. The people of the Gentiles which believed had honey, the people which was before savage is now the people of Christ.

Nor is the riddle without mystery, which he set forth to his companions: "Out of the eater came forth meat, and out of the strong came forth sweetness." And there was a mystery up to the point of the three days in which its answer was sought in vain, which could not be made known except by the faith of the Church, on the seventh day, the time of the Law being completed, after the Passion of the Lord. For thus you find that the apostles did not understand, "because Jesus was not yet glorified."
d. AD 542Caesarius of ArlesPost-NiceneSourceSERMON 119.2
Since sacred Scripture can be understood and interpreted in many ways as a pearl, Christ himself is not unfittingly regarded as the lion.… But he was victorious in his triumph over the devil through his death on the cross. Indeed, he is both the lion and the lion’s cub: a lion because equal to the Father; the lion’s cub because the Son of the Father who was killed by his own will and rose again by his own power. Of him it is written: “Who will disturb him?” Voluntarily offering his father the sacrifice of his body for us, he who is most high forever takes up the life which he himself had laid down, as he testifies. That Samson says, “Out of the eater came forth food, and out of the strong came forth sweetness,” is fittingly applied to Christ. By his teaching he both chews over the spiritual food of his honey and in his promises gives it to us. In still another way this can be understood concerning Christ. This lion, that is, Christ from the tribe of Judah, victoriously descended into hell to snatch us from the mouth of the hostile lion. For this reason he hunts in order to protect, seizes in order to free, leads people captive in order to restore them when freed to their eternal country.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Judges 14:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8