Joshua 11:22
“The Conquest of the Anakim and Conclusion”Joshua 11:21–23
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- לֹאlo'notH3808NegParticle Negative
- נוֹתַרno·Tarit was leftH3498V-Niphal-Perf-3msVerb Niphal Perfect 3rd Singular Masculine
- עֲנָקִים'a·na·KimAnakitesH6062N-mpNoun Gentilic Plural Masculine Absolute
- בְּאֶרֶץbe·'E·retzin [the] land ofH776Prep-b ¦ N-fscNoun Singular Feminine Constructבְּinאֶרֶץ[the] land of
- בְּנֵיbe·Nei[the] people ofH1121N-mpcNoun Plural Masculine Construct
- יִשְׂרָאֵלYis·ra·'ElIsraelH3478N-properNoun Proper Location
- רַקRakonlyH7535AdvAdverb
- בְּעַזָּהbe·'a·Zahin GazaH5804Prep-b ¦ N-properNoun Proper LocationבְּinעַזָּהGaza
- בְּגַתbe·Gatin GathH1661Prep-b ¦ N-properNoun Proper LocationבְּinגַתGath
- וּבְאַשְׁדּוֹדu·ve·'ash·Dodand in AshdodH795Conj-w ¦ Prep-b ¦ N-properNoun Proper LocationוּandבְinאַשְׁדּוֹדAshdod
- נִשְׁאָרוּnish·'A·ruthey remainedH7604V-Niphal-Perf-3cpVerb Niphal Perfect 3rd Plural common gender
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Joshua 11:15–23. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
We have here the conclusion of this whole matter.
I.A short account is here given of what was done in four things:
- 1. The obstinacy of the Canaanites in their opposition to the Israelites. It was strange that though it appeared so manifestly that God fought for Israel, and in every engagement the Canaanites had the worst of it, yet they stood it out to the last; not one city made peace with Israel, but the Gibeonites only, who understood the things that belonged to their peace better than their neighbours, Joshua 11:19. It is intimated that other cities might have made as good terms for themselves, without ragged clothes and clouted shoes, if they would have humbled themselves, but they never so much as desired conditions of peace. We here are told whence this unaccountable infatuation came: It was of the Lord to harden their hearts, Joshua 11:20. As Pharaoh's heart was hardened by his own pride and wilfulness first, and afterwards by the righteous judgment of God, to his destruction, so were the hearts of these Canaanites. To punish them for all their other follies, God left them to this, to make those their enemies whom they might have made their friends. This was it that ruined them: they came against Israel in battle, and gave the first blow, and therefore might have no favour shown them. Those know not what they do who give the provocation to divine justice, or the authorized instruments of it. Are we stronger than God? Observe here, That hardness of heart is the ruin of sinners. Those that are stupid and secure, and heedless of divine warnings, are already marked for destruction. What hope is there of those concerning whom God has said, Go, make their hearts fat? 2. The constancy of the Israelites in prosecuting this war (Joshua 11:18): Joshua made war a long time; some reckon it five years, others seven, that were spent in subduing this land: so long God would train up Israel to war, and give them repeated instances of his power and goodness in every new victory that he gave them. 3. The conquest of the Anakim at last, Joshua 11:21, Joshua 11:22. Either this was done as they met with them where they were dispersed, as some think, or rather it should seem the Anakim had retired to their fastnesses, and so were hunted out and cut off at last, after all the rest of Israel's enemies. The mountains of Judah and Israel were the habitations of those mountains of men; but not their height, nor the strength of their caves, nor the difficulty of the passes to them, could secure, no, not these mighty men, from the sword of Joshua. The cutting off of the sons of Anak is particularly mentioned because these had been such a terror to the spies forty years before, and their bulk and strength had been thought an insuperable difficulty in the way of the reducing of Canaan, Numbers 13:28, Numbers 13:33. Even that opposition which seemed invincible was got over. Never let the sons of Anak be a terror to the Israel of God, for even their day will come to fall. Giants are dwarfs to Omnipotence; yet this struggle with the Anakim was reserved for the latter end of the war, when the Israelites had become more expert in the arts of war, and had had more experience of the power and goodness of God. Note, God sometimes reserves the sharpest trials of his people by affliction and temptation for the latter end of their days. Therefore let not him that girds on the harness boast as he that puts it off. Death, that tremendous son of Anak, is the last enemy that is to be encountered; but it is to be destroyed, 1 Corinthians 15:26. Thanks be to God, who will give us the victory. 4. The end and issue of this long war. The Canaanites were rooted out, not perfectly (as we shall find after in the book of Judges), but in a good measure; they were not able to make any head either, (1.) So as to keep the Israelites out of possession of the land: Joshua took all that land, Joshua 11:16, Joshua 11:17. And we may suppose the people dispersed themselves and their families into the countries they had conquered, at least those that lay nearest to the head-quarters at Gilgal, until an orderly distribution should be made by lot, that every man might know his own. Or, (2.) So as to keep them in action, or give them any molestation (Joshua 11:23): The land rested from war. It ended not in a peace with the Canaanites (that was forbidden), but in a peace from them. There is a rest, a rest from war, remaining for the people of God, into which they shall enter when their warfare is accomplished.
II.That which was now done is here compared with that which had been said to Moses.
God's word and his works, if viewed and considered together, will mutually illustrate each other. It is here observed in the close,
1.That all the precepts God had given to Moses relating to the conquest of Canaan were obeyed on the people's part, at least while Joshua lived. See how solemnly this is remarked (Joshua 11:15): As the Lord commanded Moses his servant, by whose hand the law was given, so did Moses command Joshua, for Moses was faithful, as a law-giver, to him that appointed him; he did his part, and then he died: but were the commands of Moses observed when he was in his grave? Yes, they were: So did Joshua, who was, in his place, as faithful as Moses in his. He left nothing undone (Heb. he removed nothing) of all that the Lord commanded Moses. Those that leave their duty undone do what they can to remove or make void the command of God, by which they are bound to do it; but Joshua, by performing the precept, confirmed it, as the expression is, Deuteronomy 27:26. Joshua was himself a great commander, and yet nothing was more his praise than his obedience. Those that rule others at their will must themselves be ruled by the divine will; then their power is indeed their honour, and not otherwise. The pious obedience for which Joshua is here commended respects especially the command to destroy the Canaanites, and to break down their altars and burn their images, Deuteronomy 7:2-5; Exodus 23:24; Exodus 34:13. Joshua, in his zeal for the Lord of hosts, spared neither the idols nor the idolaters. Saul's disobedience, or rather his partial obedience, to the command of God, for the utter destruction of the Amalekites, cost him his kingdom. It should seem Joshua himself gives this account of his most careful and punctual observance of his orders in the execution of his commission, that in all respects he had done as Moses commanded him; and then it intimates that he had more pleasure and satisfaction in reflecting upon his obedience to the commands of God in all this war, and valued himself more upon that, than upon all the gains and triumphs with which he was enriched and advanced.
2.That all the promises God had given to Moses relating to this conquest were accomplished on his part, Joshua 11:23. Joshua took the whole land, conquered it, and took possession of it, according to all that the Lord said unto Moses. God had promised to drive out the nations before them (Exodus 33:2; Exodus 34:11), and to bring them down, Deuteronomy 9:3. And now it was done. There failed not one word of the promise. Our successes and enjoyments are then doubly sweet and comfortable to us when we see them flowing to us from the promise (this is according to what the Lord said), as our obedience is then acceptable to God when it has an eye to the precept. And, if we make conscience of our duty, we need not question the performance of the promise.
Continue studying Joshua 11:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
None of the Anakim are left in Israel’s land, and the only ones remaining live in the Philistine cities of Gaza, Gath and Ashdod.
“There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel:”
Within the territory Israel now held, the people who had terrified the spies were gone. “Land” is ʼerets, here the country God promised.
“only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod, there remained.”
Three Philistine cities on the coastal plain, outside Israel’s control at this time. Gath would later be the home of Goliath (1 Samuel 17:4).
Passage studyJoshua 11:21–23
The Anakim Cut Off and the Land at Rest
Summary
After the great campaigns in the south and the north, Joshua turns on the Anakim, the giants whose size had once frightened Israel away from the land, and cuts them off from the hill country. Only three Philistine cities still hold any of them. Then the book sums up the whole conquest in one verse: Joshua took the land as the LORD had told Moses, gave it to the tribes as an inheritance, and the land rested from war. These verses show that God keeps his word, and that the enemy his people feared most was no obstacle to him.
Who the Anakim were, and why their defeat matters
The Anakim were a people who lived in Canaan before Israel came, the descendants of Anak, and they were known for their great height and strength. The Hebrew name in verse 22, ʻĂnâqîy, means an Anakite. Moses mentions them as the measure of size when he says that another people, the Emim, were counted as giants like the Anakim (Deuteronomy 2:10–11).
Israel had met them once before. When the twelve spies came back from the land, they reported that they had seen the sons of Anak and that they felt like grasshoppers beside them (Numbers 13:33). That report filled the people with fear, and a whole generation died in the wilderness. Later Moses told the next generation plainly that they would face this great and tall people, and that the LORD himself would go over before them and drive out nations greater than they were (Deuteronomy 9:2–3).
So when Joshua cuts off the Anakim, the very people who had stopped Israel at the border are removed from the land. The victory is told last among the battles of the conquest, and it shows that the LORD can overcome the adversary his people dread most.
Joshua cuts off the Anakim from the hill country
“At that time” places this campaign with the wars just described, the defeat of the southern kings in Joshua 10 and of the northern kings under Jabin of Hazor in Joshua 11:1–15. Joshua himself leads it, and he goes after the Anakim in the mountains, where they were strongest and hardest to reach.
Three towns are named. Hebron was formerly called Kiriath-Arba, Debir was formerly Kiriath-Sepher, and Anab stood with them in the southern hill country that would belong to Judah. These were the centres of Anakite power. From there the verse widens to “all the mountains of Judah” and “all the mountains of Israel”, and the words “all the mountains” are said twice so that we understand how wide the sweep was. The hill country of the whole land was cleared of them.
Two verbs describe what Joshua did. To “cut off” is kârath, a verb of cutting that here means removing an enemy completely from a place. To “destroy utterly” is châram, to put under the ban, to devote something to destruction. Both verbs stand together in the command Moses had given about the nations of Canaan. In Deuteronomy 7:2 Israel is told to destroy them utterly, with châram, and to make no covenant with them, where “make” is kârath, since a covenant was “cut”. Joshua is doing what that command required, and his obedience is the reason this verse reads as it does.
The verse speaks of the Anakim as broken as a people and removed from their strongholds. The next verse says where some survived, and the book later tells how Caleb asked for the hill country of Hebron, where Anakim were, and drove them out with the LORD’s help (Joshua 14:12–15).
Why did God command their utter destruction?
The destruction of the Anakim and the other peoples of Canaan was God’s judgment on long and deep wickedness. Those nations were given over to idolatry, to the sacrifice of children and to sexual immorality, and the law says the land itself was defiled and vomited out its inhabitants (Leviticus 18:24–25). God also commanded it to protect Israel, so that his people would be kept from the worship and practices of the nations and could live as a holy people in the land.
Moses is careful to say where the reason lay. It was for the wickedness of those nations that the LORD drove them out, and to keep the word he swore to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and Israel’s own righteousness had no part in it (Deuteronomy 9:4–5). The chapter has just said that the LORD hardened the hearts of these kings to come against Israel in battle, as he had commanded Moses (Joshua 11:20). The judgment was his, and Joshua was the servant who carried it out.
Why some Anakim remained in Gaza, Gath and Ashdod
Verse 22 states the victory and then its limit. In “the land of the children of Israel” none of the Anakim were left. The word for land, ʼerets, can mean the whole earth or one country, and here it means the territory Israel now held, the land God had promised to Abraham’s descendants.
The exception is three cities: Gaza, Gath and Ashdod. These were three of the five chief cities of the Philistines, strong fortified places on the coastal plain, away from the hill country where Joshua had fought. The name Gath is the same Hebrew word as the one for a wine-press. Israel had subdued the mountains, and the coast remained outside its control at this stage, so Anakim survived there.
Scripture records this honestly, and it matters for what comes later. The Philistines became Israel’s great enemy through the days of the judges and the first kings, and the most famous giant in the Bible, Goliath, came from Gath (1 Samuel 17:4). The book of Judges shows the same unfinished work in Judah’s own territory (Judges 1:19). The victory God gave under Joshua was real and great, and the work of possessing the land went on after him, calling for continued faith and obedience from the generations that followed.
Joshua took the whole land, as the LORD said to Moses
Verse 23 closes the first half of the book, the story of the invasion and conquest, and opens the way to the dividing of the land that begins in Joshua 13. The verb “took” is lâqach, the ordinary word for taking or receiving. Canaan in those days was a land of many separate city-states, each with its own king, and Joshua had broken their armies and their alliances one after another until no organised power was left to stand against Israel.
The centre of the verse is the phrase “according to all that the LORD said unto Moses”. Everything Joshua accomplished was the keeping of an old promise. The LORD had told Abraham, “Unto thy seed will I give this land” (Genesis 12:7), he had bound himself to it by covenant (Genesis 15:18), and through Moses he had told Israel to go in and possess what he had sworn to their fathers (Deuteronomy 1:8). Moses had also told Joshua why he could go without fear: “Ye shall not fear them: for the LORD your God he shall fight for you” (Deuteronomy 3:22). The land was taken because God fought for his people, and what he says he brings to pass.
Did Israel really take the whole land?
“The whole land” describes the conquest as a war that had been won. Joshua had defeated the kings, taken the chief strongholds and gained control of the heart of the country, so that the land lay open for Israel to settle. The book itself says shortly afterwards that much land still remained to be possessed (Joshua 13:1), and that work was left to the tribes within their own portions. Verse 23 marks the end of the united campaign under Joshua, and the promise to give Israel the land had been kept.
The land given as an inheritance to the tribes
Joshua then “gave it for an inheritance unto Israel”. The word is nachălâh, an inheritance, a portion that stays in a family and passes from one generation to the next. In Israel a family’s land was bound up with its tribe and its name, and it was held as a grant from God, who owned the land and had the right to give it. Israel received Canaan as a gift of grace.
It was given “according to their divisions by their tribes”, in an orderly way, each tribe receiving its own share. The tribes had been numbered for this purpose in Numbers 26, and the chapters that follow in Joshua set out the boundaries one by one. With this clause the book turns from the sword to the measuring line, from conquest to settlement.
The land rested from war
The last sentence is the shortest: “And the land rested from war.” The verb shâqaṭ means to be quiet, to be still, to be at rest. After years of marching and fighting, the land was quiet. Israel had wandered in the wilderness and then fought its way across Canaan, and now the people could settle, work the ground and build their life as a nation in the place God had given them.
How can the land rest when Judges tells of more fighting?
The rest of verse 23 is the end of the great war of conquest, the united campaigns that Joshua led against the kings of Canaan. It was a real season of peace, and the tribes needed it in order to settle their portions. Later fighting did come. The book of Judges tells of battles fought by single tribes or groups of tribes against Canaanites who remained and against new enemies. Those were local wars in a land already won.
This rest also points ahead. Israel’s quiet in Canaan was partial and lasted for a time, and Scripture speaks of a rest that remains for the people of God (Hebrews 4:1–11).
Jesus, the greater Joshua
Joshua led Israel against giants and brought the people into their inheritance and into rest. In all three he is a picture of Jesus, who leads his people against enemies far stronger than the Anakim: sin, death and the devil. By his cross Jesus disarmed principalities and powers and triumphed over them openly (Colossians 2:15). He was manifested to destroy the works of the devil (1 John 3:8), and through his own death he destroyed him that had the power of death and delivered those who were in bondage through fear of it (Hebrews 2:14–15).
Joshua’s victory covered one land and left Anakim on the coast. Christ’s victory is complete. God so loved the world that he gave his Son, so that whoever believes in him has everlasting life (John 3:16), and for those who are in Christ Jesus there is now no condemnation (Romans 8:1).
The Anakim who remained in the Philistine cities picture something true of the Christian life as well. The war is won, and we still wrestle against spiritual powers (Ephesians 6:12) and against the sin that lingers in us. We do so with a sure hope, because he who began a good work in us will finish it (Philippians 1:6), and Christ will return as the victorious King to complete his reign (Revelation 19:11–16).
The inheritance and the rest are fulfilled in him too. In Christ we have obtained an inheritance, and the Holy Spirit is the pledge of it until we possess it in full (Ephesians 1:11–14). And the quiet of verse 23 is answered by his own words: “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28).
A promise kept against giants
Forty years before, the sight of the Anakim had convinced Israel that God’s promise could fail. These verses record that the promise held and the giants fell. God’s faithfulness is measured here against the very thing his people were most afraid of, and that is a comfort when a sin, a fear or a circumstance stands before us as large as the sons of Anak stood before the spies. The LORD who fought for Israel fights for his people still.
The passage is honest about what remained as well. Anakim lived on in three cities, and a giant came out of Gath generations later. What is left unconquered in a believer’s life has a way of returning, which is why the thoroughness of Joshua’s obedience matters and why holiness is the work of a whole lifetime.
And the passage ends in quiet. The land that God promised was given, each tribe had its portion, and the fighting stopped. God gives his people an inheritance they did not earn and a rest that follows the battle, and both are held for us in Christ, where they are secure.
Joshua 11:21
“And at that time came Joshua,”
The campaign belongs to the same period as the wars against the southern and northern kings, and Joshua leads it in person as the leader God appointed.
“and cut off the Anakims from the mountains,”
The KJV adds an English “s” to a word that is already plural, the Anakim, ʻĂnâqî in the form this verse’s word study gives. “Cut off” is kârath, and the mountains are the rugged hill country where they had their strongholds.
“from Hebron, from Debir, from Anab,”
Three known towns in the south, in the territory marked out for Judah. Their fall broke the core of Anakite strength.
“and from all the mountains of Judah, and from all the mountains of Israel:”
The campaign reached the highlands of the whole country, south and north.
“Joshua destroyed them utterly with their cities.”
Châram, to devote to destruction. The people and their towns were both put under the ban that Deuteronomy 7:2 commanded.
Joshua 11:22 This verse
“There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel:”
Within the territory Israel now held, the people who had terrified the spies were gone. “Land” is ʼerets, here the country God promised.
“only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod, there remained.”
Three Philistine cities on the coastal plain, outside Israel’s control at this time. Gath would later be the home of Goliath (1 Samuel 17:4).
Joshua 11:23
“So Joshua took the whole land,”
Lâqach, to take. The sentence sums up all the campaigns of the book so far: the organised resistance of Canaan was broken.
“according to all that the LORD said unto Moses;”
The success is credited to God’s word and Joshua’s obedience to it, and through Moses it reaches back to the promise made to Abraham.
“and Joshua gave it for an inheritance unto Israel”
Nachălâh, a lasting family portion. Joshua hands out as God’s steward what God himself was giving.
“according to their divisions by their tribes.”
Each tribe received its own share within set boundaries, which shaped Israel’s life for generations.
“And the land rested from war.”
Shâqaṭ, to be quiet and still. The great united war was over, and the people could settle.
Last revised