Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And said unto him, Dost thou certainly know that Baalis the king of the Ammonites hath sent Ishmael the son of Nethaniah to slay thee? But Gedaliah the son of Ahikam believed them not.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And said H559 unto him, Dost thou certainly H3045 know H3045 that Baalis H1185 the king H4428 of the Ammonites H1121 H5983 hath sent H7971 Ishmael H3458 the son H1121 of Nethaniah H5418 to slay H5221 H5315 thee? But Gedaliah H1436 the son H1121 of Ahikam H296 believed H539 them not.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
and said to him, "Are you aware that Ba'alis the king of the people of 'Amon has sent Yishma'el the son of N'tanyahu to take your life?" But G'dalyahu the son of Achikam did not believe them.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
and said to him, “Are you aware that Baalis king of the Ammonites has sent Ishmael son of Nethaniah to take your life?” But Gedaliah son of Ahikam did not believe them.
Ask
American Standard Version
and said unto him, Dost thou know that Baalis the king of the children of Ammon hath sent Ishmael the son of Nethaniah to take thy life? But Gedaliah the son of Ahikam believed them not.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and said to him, Do you know that Baalis the king of the children of Ammon has sent Ishmael the son of Nethaniah to take your life? But Gedaliah the son of Ahikam didn’t believe them.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And said vnto him, Knowest thou not that Baalis the King of the Ammonites hath sent Ishmael the sonne of Nethaniah to slay thee? But Gedaliah the sonne of Ahikam beleeued them not.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and they say unto him, `Dost thou really know that Baalis king of the sons of Ammon hath sent Ishmael son of Nethaniah to smite thy soul?' And Gedaliah son of Ahikam hath not given to them credence.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 40:14 captures a pivotal and tragic moment in post-exilic Judah, where Johanan and other military commanders deliver an urgent and credible warning to Gedaliah, the newly appointed governor, about an assassination plot orchestrated by Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, and to be executed by Ishmael, the son of Nethaniah. Despite the emphatic nature of this intelligence, Gedaliah fatally dismisses it, a decision that not only seals his own doom but also precipitates further chaos and suffering for the fragile Jewish remnant striving to rebuild in the land.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Jeremiah 40 is a crucial chapter, marking the beginning of the aftermath of Jerusalem's devastating fall in 586 BC, detailed in the preceding chapters. Following the destruction, Jeremiah 39:11-14 describes Jeremiah's release by Nebuchadnezzar's command, leading into his choice to remain in Judah with Gedaliah, as recounted in Jeremiah 40:1-6. The narrative then shifts to Gedaliah's appointment as governor by the Babylonians and the subsequent gathering of the scattered Jewish remnant under his leadership, offering a glimmer of hope for stability (Jeremiah 40:7-12). Our verse, Jeremiah 40:14, immediately follows Johanan's initial approach to Gedaliah in Jeremiah 40:13, setting up the direct confrontation and the urgent warning. The tragic consequences of Gedaliah's disbelief are swiftly and brutally realized in Jeremiah 41:1-3, where Ishmael executes the very plot he was warned about, plunging the remnant into deeper despair and flight.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period following the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple in 586 BC was one of profound national trauma, political vacuum, and immense instability for the remaining population of Judah. Nebuchadnezzar's decision to appoint Gedaliah, a Judahite from a prominent and respected family (his grandfather Shaphan was a scribe, and his father Ahikam had protected Jeremiah, as noted in Jeremiah 26:24), was a strategic move to establish a local, ostensibly loyal, administration. This attempt to restore a semblance of order was, however, fraught with internal divisions and external threats. The Ammonites, a long-standing Transjordanian adversary of Israel, likely viewed Judah's weakened state as an opportune moment to destabilize the region further, challenge Babylonian authority, and perhaps expand their own territorial or political influence. The choice of Ishmael, a member of the Judahite royal family (descended from Elishama, a royal scribe, as mentioned in 2 Kings 25:25), as the assassin was particularly insidious. It leveraged an internal figure to sow discord, eliminate the Babylonian-appointed leader, and potentially incite rebellion, thereby serving Ammonite interests by exploiting Judah's internal vulnerabilities.

  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully encapsulates several critical themes woven throughout the book of Jeremiah and the broader prophetic corpus. Firstly, it starkly illustrates the peril of disbelief and poor discernment. Gedaliah's catastrophic rejection of a clear, credible warning directly leads to his assassination and the subsequent scattering of the fragile remnant, underscoring the vital importance of heeding wise counsel and discerning genuine threats. This contrasts sharply with the wisdom literature's call for prudence, as seen in Proverbs 1:5. Secondly, the narrative highlights the pervasive treachery and deceit that characterized this tumultuous era, not only from foreign adversaries like Ammon but, more tragically, from within Judah's own ranks, exemplified by Ishmael's betrayal. This internal strife exacerbated the nation's already dire circumstances. Lastly, the passage subtly touches upon the interplay of divine judgment and human responsibility. While Judah had experienced God's judgment through the Babylonian conquest, human choices—such as Gedaliah's failure to believe and act on sound counsel—played a direct and significant role in the unfolding tragedy, demonstrating that even within the framework of divine discipline, human agency and its consequences remain profoundly significant.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • know (Hebrew, yâdaʻ', H3045): This word is used emphatically in the Hebrew construction "Dost thou certainly know" (literally, "knowing, do you know?"). It signifies more than mere intellectual awareness; it implies a deep, experiential, and certain understanding or discernment. Johanan and the commanders are not just relaying information; they are asserting that their intelligence is verified and undeniable, urging Gedaliah to grasp the gravity and certainty of the imminent threat with full comprehension.
  • Baalis (Hebrew, Baʻălîyç', H1185): This proper noun identifies the king of the Ammonites. The name likely means "in exultation," possibly reflecting a boastful or triumphant disposition. His involvement underscores the external dimension of the plot, revealing how Judah's traditional enemies sought to exploit its profound vulnerability and the fragile peace established by the Babylonian administration. His active role signifies a calculated foreign intervention aimed at destabilizing the remaining Judahite presence.
  • believed (Hebrew, ʼâman', H539): This verb means to build up, support, be firm, faithful, or to trust and believe. Gedaliah's declaration, "believed them not," indicates a complete and resolute rejection of the commanders' testimony. He failed to find their words firm, trustworthy, or credible. This profound lack of faith in the warning, despite its emphatic and urgent delivery, proved to be his undoing, highlighting a tragic absence of discernment and a fatal unwillingness to trust the counsel of others who possessed critical intelligence.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And said unto him, Dost thou certainly know": This opening clause immediately thrusts the reader into a scene of urgent confrontation. Johanan and the other military commanders are directly addressing Gedaliah, employing a highly emphatic Hebrew construction to convey the absolute certainty and critical nature of the intelligence they are about to impart. It functions as a desperate plea, an almost rhetorical question designed to compel Gedaliah to acknowledge the undeniable truth and pay close attention to the gravity of the situation.
  • "that Baalis the king of the Ammonites hath sent Ishmael the son of Nethaniah to slay thee?": This is the core of the specific and credible assassination warning. The conspirators are clearly identified: Baalis, the foreign king of Ammon, is named as the orchestrator, and Ishmael, a Judahite of royal descent, is explicitly designated as the appointed assassin. The target is unequivocally Gedaliah, and the intent is explicitly "to slay thee," emphasizing the deadly, personal, and premeditated purpose of Ishmael's mission. This clause lays bare the precise nature of the existential threat.
  • "But Gedaliah the son of Ahikam believed them not.": This final clause marks the tragic turning point of the verse and the narrative. Despite the emphatic warning, the clear identification of the threat, and the detailed nature of the plot, Gedaliah utterly dismisses the intelligence. His disbelief, whether stemming from naivety, overconfidence, a desire to maintain a fragile peace, or an inability to conceive of such treachery from a fellow Judahite, tragically seals his fate. The mention of his father, Ahikam, who was known for protecting Jeremiah, adds a poignant layer of tragic irony, as Gedaliah fails to exhibit the discernment and wisdom that might have been expected from his lineage.

Literary Devices

Jeremiah 40:14 is powerfully imbued with Dramatic Irony, as the reader, along with Johanan and the other commanders, is fully aware of the impending doom that Gedaliah, the central figure, stubbornly refuses to acknowledge. This creates a profound sense of tension and dread, knowing the tragic outcome that will inevitably unfold in the subsequent chapter. The explicit warning itself serves as potent Foreshadowing, directly predicting the assassination detailed with chilling precision in Jeremiah 41. Furthermore, there is a stark Contrast presented between the emphatic certainty and urgent conviction of Johanan's warning ("Dost thou certainly know") and Gedaliah's immediate, resolute disbelief ("believed them not"). This juxtaposition highlights Gedaliah's fatal lack of discernment and his tragic miscalculation of the danger, which ultimately leads to his demise and further suffering for the remnant.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 40:14 serves as a profound theological and practical lesson on the catastrophic consequences of rejecting wise counsel and succumbing to spiritual and practical blindness. Gedaliah's disbelief in the face of clear and present danger underscores the pervasive human tendency to dismiss uncomfortable truths, especially when those truths challenge one's preconceived notions, desired outcomes, or sense of security. The narrative implicitly warns against a naive optimism or a misplaced trust that ignores credible threats, particularly when such threats emanate from unexpected sources or demand a difficult response. This tragic episode highlights the critical importance of discernment, vigilance, and the humility to heed warnings, recognizing that even well-intentioned leaders can fall prey to fatal errors in judgment when they fail to believe and act upon sound advice. It is a stark reminder that wisdom often resides in acknowledging difficult realities and taking proactive steps, rather than dismissing them out of convenience or denial.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Gedaliah's tragic refusal to believe the urgent warning in Jeremiah 40:14 offers a powerful and enduring cautionary tale for believers today. In our increasingly complex and information-saturated world, we are constantly bombarded with various forms of information, advice, and warnings—some true, some deceptive. This verse challenges us to cultivate profound spiritual discernment, to be attentive to the counsel of trusted, godly individuals, and to critically evaluate potential threats, whether they pertain to our physical well-being, our spiritual integrity, the health of our families, or the vitality of our communities. It reminds us that complacency, naive optimism, or a stubborn adherence to our own perceptions can be profoundly dangerous. True wisdom, as exemplified by the prophets and sages of Scripture, often involves recognizing and responding to uncomfortable truths, even when they disrupt our peace or challenge our assumptions. We are called to be vigilant, not paranoid; to be discerning, not suspicious; and to pray earnestly for the wisdom to distinguish between genuine threats and unfounded fears, always seeking to align our understanding and actions with God's revealed truth.

Questions for Reflection

  • What underlying factors or human tendencies might have contributed to Gedaliah's inability to believe such a clear and urgent warning?
  • In what areas of my own life might I be prone to dismissing warnings or uncomfortable truths, whether they come from Scripture, the wise counsel of others, or the promptings of my conscience?
  • How can I actively cultivate greater spiritual discernment and a humble spirit that is genuinely open to receiving and acting upon wise counsel, even when that counsel is difficult to hear or demands significant change?

FAQ

Why did Gedaliah refuse to believe Johanan's warning, despite its urgency and specificity?

Answer: While the text does not explicitly state Gedaliah's precise motivations, several possibilities can be inferred from the historical and literary context. Gedaliah may have been overly optimistic, genuinely believing that peace could be maintained through trust and diplomacy, and thus unwilling to believe in such profound treachery. He might have underestimated Ishmael, perhaps viewing him as a fellow Judahite of royal lineage who would not stoop to assassination, or he might have simply been naive about the deep-seated animosities and ruthless political machinations at play in the post-exilic environment. It's also plausible that he feared that acknowledging the plot would cause widespread panic and further destabilize the already fragile remnant, preferring to maintain a facade of control and order. His desire to establish a peaceful and stable administration might have led him to dismiss any information that threatened that delicate peace, even if it was true. Ultimately, his fatal flaw appears to have been a lack of discernment and a misplaced trust, which directly led to the tragic events detailed in Jeremiah 41.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic narrative of Gedaliah's disbelief and subsequent death in Jeremiah 40:14, leading to further chaos and scattering for the remnant, finds a profound Christ-centered fulfillment through both stark contrast and ultimate redemption. Gedaliah, a leader appointed to bring peace and order to a broken people, failed to discern and believe a life-saving warning, resulting in his demise and the further fracturing of his community. In direct and glorious contrast, Jesus Christ, the true King and the Good Shepherd, repeatedly warned His disciples of His impending suffering, death, and resurrection (Matthew 16:21; Luke 9:22). While His disciples, much like Gedaliah, often struggled to comprehend or believe these uncomfortable truths (Mark 9:32), Jesus willingly embraced the "slaying" of His own life on the cross. This ultimate act of self-sacrifice, unlike the destructive assassination of Gedaliah, was not a failure of discernment but the perfect fulfillment of a divine, redemptive plan to secure eternal life for all who would believe in Him (John 3:16). Jesus is the "Amen" (Revelation 3:14), the faithful and true witness who perfectly discerned the will of God and perfectly fulfilled it, offering salvation to a world that often disbelieves His warnings about sin and judgment, yet desperately needs His truth, grace, and eternal life.

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 40 verses 7–16

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have in these verses,

I. A bright sky opening upon the remnant of the Jews that were left in their own land, and a comfortable prospect given them of some peace and quietness after the many years of trouble and terror with which they had been afflicted. Jeremiah indeed had never in his prophecies spoken of any such good days reserved for the Jews immediately after the captivity; but Providence seemed to raise and encourage such an expectation, and it would be to that miserable people as life from the dead. Observe the particulars.

1.Gedaliah, one of themselves, is made governor in the land, by the king of Babylon, Jer 40:7. To show that he designed to make and keep them easy he did not give this commission to one of the princes of Babylon, but to one of their brethren, who, they might be sure, would seek their peace. He was the son of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan, one of the princes. We read of his father (Jer 26:24) that he took Jeremiah's part against the people. He seems to have been a man of great wisdom and a mild temper, and under whose government the few that were left might have been very happy. The king of Babylon had a good opinion of him and reposed a confidence in him, for to him he committed all that were left behind.

2.There is great resort to him from all parts, and all those that were now the Jews of the dispersion came and put themselves under his government and protection. (1.) The great men that had escaped the Chaldeans by force came and quietly submitted to Gedaliah, for their own safety and common preservation. Several are here named, Jer 40:8. They came with their men, their servants, their soldiers, and so strengthened one another; and the king of Babylon had such a good opinion of Gedaliah his delegate that he was not at all jealous of the increase of their numbers, but rather pleased with it. (2.) The poor men that had escaped by flight into the neighbouring countries of Moab, Ammon, and Edom, were induced by the love they bore to their own land to return to it again as soon as they heard that Gedaliah was in authority there, Jer 40:11, Jer 40:12. Canaan itself would be an unsafe unpleasant country if there were no government nor governors there, and those that loved it dearly would not come back to it till they heard there were. It would be a great reviving to those that were dispersed to come together again, to those that were dispersed into foreign countries to come together in their own country, to those that were under strange kings to be under a governor of their own nation. See here in wrath God remembered mercy, and yet admitted some of them upon a further trial of their obedience.

3.The model of this new government is drawn up and settled by an original contract, which Gedaliah confirmed with an oath, a solemn oath (Jer 40:9): He swore to them and to their men, it is probably according to the warrant and instructions he had received from the king of Babylon, who empowered him to give them these assurances. (1.) They must own the property of their lands to be in the Chaldeans. "Come" (says Gedaliah), "fear not to serve the Chaldeans. Fear not the sin of it." Though the divine law had forbidden them to make leagues with the heathen, yet the divine sentence had obliged them to yield to the king of Babylon. "Fear not the reproach of it, and the disparagement it will be to your nation; it is what God has brought you to, has bound you to, and it is no disgrace to any to comply with him. Fear not the consequences of it, as if it would certainly make you and yours miserable; no, you will find the king of Babylon not so hard a landlord as you apprehend him to be; if you will but live peaceably, peaceably you shall live; disturb not the government, and it will not disturb you. Serve the king of Babylon and it shall be well with you." If they should make any difficulty of doing personal homage, or should be apprehensive of danger when the Chaldeans should come among them, Gedaliah, probably by instruction from the king of Babylon, undertakes upon all occasions to act for them, and make their application acceptable to the king (Jer 40:10): "As for me, behold, I will dwell at Mizpah, to serve the Chaldeans, to do homage to them in the name of the whole body if there be occasion, to receive orders, and to pay them their tribute when the come to us." All that passes between them and the Chaldeans shall pass through his hand; and, if the Chaldeans put such a confidence in him, surely his own countrymen may venture to do it. Gedaliah is willing thus to give them the assurance of an oath that he will do his part in protecting them, but, being apt to err (as many good men are) on the charitable side, he did not require an oath from them that they would be faithful to him, else the following mischief might have been prevented. However, protection draws allegiance though it be not sworn, and by joining in with Gedaliah they did, in effect, consent to the terms of government, that they should serve the king of Babylon. But, (2.) Though they own the property of their lands to be in the Chaldeans, yet, upon that condition, they shall have the free enjoyment of them and all the profits of them (Jer 40:10): "Gather you wine and summer fruits, and take them for your own use; put them in your vessels, to be laid up for winter-store, as those do that live in a land of peace and hope to eat the labour of your hand, nay, the labour of other people's hands, for you reap what they sowed." Or perhaps they were the spontaneous products of that fertile soil, for which none had laboured. And accordingly we find (Jer 40:12) that they gathered wine and summer fruits very much, such as were at present upon the ground, for their corn-harvest was over some time before Jerusalem was taken. While Gedaliah was in care for the public safety he left them to enjoy the advantages of the public plenty, and, for aught that appears, demanded no tribute from them; for he sought not his own profit, but the profit of many.

II. Here is a dark cloud gathering over this infant state, and threatening a dreadful storm. How soon is this hopeful prospect blasted! For when God begins in judgment he will make an end. It is here intimated to us, 1. That Baalis the king of the Ammonites had a particular spite at Gedaliah, and was contriving to take him off, either out of malice to the nation of the Jews, whose welfare he hated the thought of, or a personal pique against Gedaliah, Jer 40:14. Some make Baalis to signify the queen-mother of the king of the Ammonites, or queen-dowager, as if she were the first mover of the bloody and treacherous design. One would have thought this little remnant might be safe when the great king of Babylon protected it; and ye it is ruined by the artifices of this petty prince or princess. happy are those that have the King of kings of their side, who can take the wise in their own craftiness; for the greatest earthly king cannot with all his power secure us against fraud and treachery. 2. That he employed Ishmael, the son of Nethaniah, as the instrument of his malice, instigated him to murder Gedaliah, and, that he might have a fair opportunity to do it, directed him to go and enrol himself among his subjects and promise him fealty. Nothing could be more barbarous than the design itself, nor more base than the method of compassing it. How wretchedly is human nature corrupted and degenerated (even in those that pretend to the best blood) when it is capable of admitting the thought of such abominable wickedness! Ishmael was of the seed royal, and would therefore be easily tempted to envy and hate one that set up for a governor in Judah, who was not, as he was, of David's line, though he had ever so much of David's spirit. 3. That Johanan, a brisk and active man, having got scent of this plot, informed Gedaliah of it, yet taking it for granted he could not but know of it before, the proofs of the matter being so very plain: Dost thou certainly know? surely thou dost, Jer 40:14. He gave him private intelligence of it (Jer 40:15), hoping he would then take the more notice of it. He proffered his service to prevent it, by taking off Ishmael, whose very name was ominous to all the seed of Isaac: I will slay him. Wherefore should he slay thee? Herein he showed more courage and zeal than sense of justice; for, if it be lawful to kill for prevention, who then can be safe, since malice always suspects the worst? 4. That Gedaliah, being a man of sincerity himself, would by no means give credit to the information given him of Ishmael's treachery. He said, Thou speakest falsely of Ishmael. Herein he discovered more good humour than discretion, more of the innocency of the dove than the wisdom of the serpent. Princes become uneasy to themselves and all about them when they are jealous. Queen Elizabeth said that she would believe no more evil of her people than a mother would believe of her own children; yet many have been ruined by being over-confident of the fidelity of those about them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 7–16. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 40:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.