Jeremiah 40:15

Translation
King James Version
Then Johanan the son of Kareah spake to Gedaliah in Mizpah secretly, saying, Let me go, I pray thee, and I will slay Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, and no man shall know it: wherefore should he slay thee, that all the Jews which are gathered unto thee should be scattered, and the remnant in Judah perish?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Then Johanan H3110 the son H1121 of Kareah H7143 spake H559 to Gedaliah H1436 in Mizpah H4709 secretly H5643, saying H559, Let me go H3212, I pray thee, and I will slay H5221 Ishmael H3458 the son H1121 of Nethaniah H5418, and no man H376 shall know H3045 it: wherefore should he slay H5221 H5315 thee, that all the Jews H3064 which are gathered H6908 unto thee should be scattered H6327, and the remnant H7611 in Judah H3063 perish H6?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Then Yochanan the son of Kareach spoke privately with G'dalyahu in Mitzpah: "Please, let me go, and I will kill Yishma'el the son of N'tanyahu; no one will know. Why let him assassinate you? Moreover, if he does, all the Judeans gathered around you will scatter; and the remnant of Y'hudah will perish."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then Johanan son of Kareah spoke privately to Gedaliah at Mizpah. “Let me go and kill Ishmael son of Nethaniah,” he said. “No one will know it. Why should he take your life and scatter all the people of Judah who have gathered to you, so that the remnant of Judah would perish?”
Ask
American Standard Version
Then Johanan the son of Kareah spake to Gedaliah in Mizpah secretly, saying, Let me go, I pray thee, and I will slay Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, and no man shall know it: wherefore should he take thy life, that all the Jews that are gathered unto thee should be scattered, and the remnant of Judah perish?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Then Yochanan the son of Kareah spoke to Gedaliah in Mizpah secretly, saying, Please let me go, and I will kill Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, and no man shall know it: why should he take your life, that all the Jews who are gathered to you should be scattered, and the remnant of Judah perish?
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then Iohanan the sonne of Kareah spake to Gedaliah in Mizpah secretly, saying, Let me goe, I pray thee, and I will slay Ishmael the sonne of Nethaniah, and no man shall know it. Wherefore should he kill thee, that all the Iewes, which are gathered vnto thee, shoulde be scattered, and the remnant in Iudah perish?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Johanan son of Kareah hath spoken unto Gedaliah in secret, in Mizpah, saying, `Let me go, I pray thee, and I smite Ishmael son of Nethaniah, and no one doth know; why doth he smite thy soul? and scattered have been all Judah who are gathered unto thee, and perished hath the remnant of Judah.'
Ask
See also
1 Samuel 26:82 Samuel 21:171 Samuel 24:4Ezekiel 33:24Ezekiel 33:292 Samuel 18:3Jeremiah 42:2
See on the biblical-era map
Gedaliah and Ishmael
Gedaliah and Ishmael View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 19,957 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 40:15 captures a pivotal, clandestine conversation between Johanan, son of Kareah, and Gedaliah, the newly appointed governor of Judah. In the tumultuous aftermath of Jerusalem's destruction and the Babylonian exile, Johanan urgently proposes the secret assassination of Ishmael, son of Nethaniah, to avert a catastrophic outcome: the scattering of the fragile Jewish remnant gathered under Gedaliah's leadership and their ultimate perishing in Judah. This verse illuminates the desperate measures contemplated by surviving leaders to preserve the last vestiges of the covenant people in their homeland amidst profound political instability and internal threats.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated immediately after the devastating fall of Jerusalem and the subsequent deportation of many Jews to Babylon, events meticulously chronicled in Jeremiah 39. Following this national catastrophe, Nebuchadnezzar, the Babylonian king, appointed Gedaliah, son of Ahikam, as governor over the remaining poor in the land. Gedaliah established his administrative center in Mizpah and sought to bring a semblance of stability, encouraging the people to settle and serve the king of Babylon for their own good, promising them peace and security, as seen in Jeremiah 40:9-10. Various Jewish military captains and their men, including Johanan, who had been scattered during the siege, heard of Gedaliah's appointment and gathered to him at Mizpah. However, a dangerous undercurrent existed: Ishmael, a man of royal descent, was secretly plotting against Gedaliah, likely instigated by Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, a fact revealed to Gedaliah in Jeremiah 40:14. Johanan, having received intelligence of this perilous plot, takes the initiative in this verse to warn Gedaliah directly and propose a drastic, pre-emptive solution to safeguard the nascent community.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period following the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BC was one of profound national trauma, disorientation, and existential uncertainty for the Jewish people. The revered Davidic monarchy had ended, the sacred Temple was utterly destroyed, and a significant portion of the population, including the elite, was forcibly exiled. Those left in Judah constituted a vulnerable remnant, struggling to rebuild their lives amidst the ruins of their former society. Mizpah, a site with deep historical and religious significance, became the administrative center, symbolizing a fragile attempt at re-establishing some form of Jewish presence and governance in the land. The broader geopolitical landscape was fraught with danger, with opportunistic regional powers like Ammon seeking to exploit Judah's profound weakness. Internally, the surviving Jewish leaders faced immense pressure, and internal strife, particularly among those vying for influence or harboring resentment, posed an equally grave threat. The concept of "secret" plots, assassinations, and political intrigue was unfortunately common in ancient Near Eastern politics, reflecting the ruthless nature of power struggles and the desperate measures taken to secure or maintain control. Johanan's proposal, though extreme by modern standards, was born out of a desperate desire to protect the vulnerable community from further calamity and ensure its very survival.
  • Key Themes: The passage powerfully articulates several key themes pervasive in the book of Jeremiah and the broader prophetic literature. Central among these is the preservation of the remnant, a recurring motif highlighting God's enduring faithfulness to His covenant people even amidst severe judgment and national devastation. Johanan's profound concern for "all the Jews which are gathered unto thee" and "the remnant in Judah" underscores the fragile hope for the continuation of the covenant line and the Jewish presence in the land. Another critical theme is leadership and discernment, as Gedaliah's trusting nature and tragic failure to heed Johanan's urgent and well-founded warning ultimately lead to his demise and further suffering for the remnant, as meticulously detailed in Jeremiah 41. This highlights the immense responsibility, the moral complexities, and the potential pitfalls of leadership in times of profound crisis. The theme of treachery and internal strife is also prominently displayed, as Ishmael's malicious intent, fueled by ambition and external influence, threatens to undo the nascent stability and unity. Finally, the verse speaks to the dire consequences of unheeded warnings, a tragic theme that echoes throughout Jeremiah's prophetic ministry, where the people repeatedly ignored God's warnings delivered through His prophet, leading to the very destruction they now faced and the subsequent threats to their survival.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Gedaliah (Hebrew, Gᵉdalyâh', H1436): Derived from the roots for "great" (גָּדַל, gadal) and "Yah" (יָהּ, a shortened form of Yahweh), this name means "Jah has become great" or "Yahweh is great." Gedaliah was the son of Ahikam, who had previously protected Jeremiah (Jeremiah 26:24). His name, reflecting divine greatness, stands in ironic contrast to his tragic end, which came about due to his failure to discern the threat to his life and the community he was appointed to lead.
  • slay (Hebrew, nâkâh', H5221): A primitive root meaning "to strike (lightly or severely, literally or figuratively)." This verb encompasses a range of actions from merely striking to inflicting a fatal blow, including "kill," "murder," and "smite." Johanan's direct proposal to "slay" Ishmael reveals the gravity of the perceived threat and the extreme, violent measure he believed necessary to avert a greater disaster. The repetition of this verb ("I will slay... wherefore should he slay thee") underscores the life-and-death stakes involved and the pre-emptive nature of Johanan's desperate plan.
  • know (Hebrew, yâdaʻ', H3045): A primitive root meaning "to know (properly, to ascertain by seeing)." This verb carries a wide semantic range, including observation, recognition, understanding, and even intimate acquaintance. In the context of "no man shall know it," it signifies Johanan's intention for the act to remain entirely secret and undetected, preventing public outcry, further political instability, or retribution from Ishmael's allies. This highlights the clandestine and politically sensitive nature of the proposed assassination.
  • remnant (Hebrew, shᵉʼêrîyth', H7611): This term refers to a remainder, a residual, or a surviving portion. In prophetic literature, "remnant" often carries profound theological significance, referring to the faithful few preserved by God amidst judgment, ensuring the continuity of His covenant people and the fulfillment of His promises. Johanan's concern for the "remnant in Judah" highlights the precarious existence of this small, vulnerable group and the immense importance of their survival for the future of Israel's presence in the land. Their perishing would represent the complete failure of the post-exilic community.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Then Johanan the son of Kareah spake to Gedaliah in Mizpah secretly, saying,": This initial clause precisely sets the scene, identifying the key individuals involved—Johanan, a military captain, and Gedaliah, the newly appointed Babylonian governor—and the location, Mizpah, which had become the administrative center for the remaining Jewish population. The crucial adverb "secretly" immediately signals the confidential, sensitive, and potentially dangerous nature of the conversation that is about to unfold, indicating that Johanan's message is not for public ears.
  • "Let me go, I pray thee, and I will slay Ishmael the son of Nethaniah,": Johanan's direct and urgent plea to Gedaliah. He requests explicit permission and volunteers to personally eliminate Ishmael, revealing his conviction that Ishmael poses an immediate and existential threat to Gedaliah's life and the stability of the community. The phrase "I pray thee" conveys the earnestness, humility, and desperate urgency of his appeal, emphasizing the gravity of the situation as he perceives it.
  • "and no man shall know [it]:": This part of Johanan's proposal underscores the clandestine nature of the intended act. He plans for the assassination to be carried out discreetly, presumably to avoid further political upheaval, retribution from Ishmael's powerful allies (like the Ammonites), or punitive measures from the Babylonian authorities, who had appointed Gedaliah and sought to maintain order. Johanan believes that the secret removal of Ishmael is the best way to prevent wider chaos.
  • "wherefore should he slay thee,": Johanan articulates the immediate and personal danger to Gedaliah. He clearly states his firm belief that Ishmael intends to assassinate Gedaliah, demonstrating his foresight, his access to intelligence, and his accurate understanding of Ishmael's malicious and treacherous intentions. This is the primary, direct threat that motivates Johanan's drastic proposal.
  • "that all the Jews which are gathered unto thee should be scattered,": This clause reveals the broader, devastating consequence that Johanan foresees if Gedaliah is assassinated. The fragile community of Jews who had begun to gather under Gedaliah's leadership, seeking stability and protection, would be dispersed once more, losing their nascent sense of security, unity, and hope. This highlights the precariousness of their situation and the importance of Gedaliah's leadership as a unifying figure.
  • "and the remnant in Judah perish?": This is the ultimate, most tragic outcome Johanan seeks to prevent. The "perishing" of the "remnant" would signify the complete eradication of the Jewish presence in the land of Judah, a catastrophic end to God's covenant people in their homeland, and the undoing of any hope for future restoration. Johanan's concern extends beyond Gedaliah's life to the very survival of the community and the divine promise.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several potent literary devices to convey its urgent message and dramatic tension. Foreshadowing is prominently featured, as Johanan's urgent warning about Ishmael's intent to "slay thee" directly anticipates the tragic events of Jeremiah 41:2, where Ishmael indeed assassinates Gedaliah. This creates a profound sense of dramatic irony for the reader, who is privy to the eventual, lamentable outcome of Gedaliah's unheeded warning. The passage also utilizes contrast between Johanan's clear-sighted, pragmatic, though extreme, assessment of the danger and Gedaliah's apparent naivete or trusting nature, which ultimately proves to be his fatal flaw. The language used by Johanan, particularly the earnest "I pray thee" and the dire, escalating consequences he outlines (from Gedaliah's death to the scattering and perishing of the remnant), conveys a powerful sense of plea and urgency, emphasizing the exceptionally high stakes involved in this pivotal moment for the surviving Jewish community.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This passage profoundly underscores the theological theme of the preservation of the remnant, a recurring and vital motif throughout the Old Testament. Even in the midst of severe divine judgment and national catastrophe, God consistently preserves a faithful few, ensuring the continuity of His covenant promises and the lineage through which the Messiah would come. Johanan's desperate plea to protect the "remnant in Judah" reflects this divine concern, even if his proposed method is a humanly conceived, morally ambiguous act. The unheeded warning to Gedaliah serves as a tragic echo of Israel's consistent failure to heed God's warnings delivered through His prophets, ultimately leading to their exile and now threatening the very survival of those who remained. It highlights the critical importance of discernment, wisdom, and decisive action in leadership, especially when facing threats that could jeopardize the very existence and future of God's people.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jeremiah 40:15 challenges us to deeply consider the weighty responsibility of leadership and the critical importance of discernment, particularly in times of profound vulnerability and crisis. Gedaliah's tragic failure to believe Johanan's urgent and accurate warning, perhaps stemming from a desire for peace, a reluctance to resort to violence, or a naive trust in others, ultimately led to his own demise and the further scattering and suffering of the very people he was appointed to protect. This serves as a sober and poignant reminder that true wisdom involves not only good intentions and a desire for harmony but also a clear-eyed and realistic assessment of reality, including the potential for deep-seated malice and treachery in others. For us today, this passage prompts profound reflection on how we respond to warnings, whether they come from trusted advisors, spiritual leaders, or even the subtle promptings of the Holy Spirit. Are we willing to confront uncomfortable truths or take difficult, even unpopular, actions to protect what is truly precious, whether it be a community, a family, our personal integrity, or our own spiritual well-being? The passage also highlights the complex ethical dilemmas that can arise when attempting to protect a vulnerable group, forcing us to grapple with the tension between pacifism and the necessity of decisive intervention in the face of existential threats.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do I typically respond to warnings, especially when they challenge my preconceived notions, preferences, or desire for peace?
  • What role does spiritual discernment play in my decision-making processes, both personally and in any leadership roles I hold within my family, community, or church?
  • In what specific ways might I be tempted to ignore difficult truths or avoid confronting potential dangers in favor of a more comfortable or naive perspective?
  • How does this passage inform my understanding of the responsibilities involved in protecting vulnerable individuals or communities, and what ethical considerations might arise?

FAQ

Why did Johanan propose to slay Ishmael secretly, and not openly?

Answer: Johanan's proposal to slay Ishmael "secretly" (Hebrew: çêther') was likely a calculated decision motivated by several critical factors aimed at minimizing further chaos and maximizing the chances of preserving the fragile Jewish remnant. Firstly, an open assassination of a man of royal descent, especially one backed by a foreign power like the Ammonites (Jeremiah 40:14), could have provoked immediate and widespread retaliation from Ishmael's followers or his external patrons, leading to a full-scale civil conflict. Secondly, it was an attempt to avoid further destabilizing the already precarious political situation in Judah under Babylonian rule. The Babylonians had appointed Gedaliah as governor to maintain order, and any overt act of violence or internal strife could have led to harsher Babylonian intervention, potentially resulting in more deportations or the complete dissolution of the Jewish presence in the land. A secret act would, in Johanan's mind, remove the immediate threat without creating a larger public crisis or revealing the deep internal divisions that could be exploited by external enemies. It was a desperate measure to achieve a critical outcome with the least possible collateral damage.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Jeremiah 40:15 depicts a desperate human attempt to preserve a physical remnant through a morally ambiguous act, it ultimately points to the greater, divinely ordained preservation found in Jesus Christ. The "remnant in Judah" that Johanan sought to protect, whose very existence was precarious, foreshadows the spiritual remnant, those whom God preserves not by human machinations or violence, but through faith in His Son. Just as Johanan desired to prevent the scattering and perishing of the Jews, Jesus, the Good Shepherd, declares His divine mission to gather His sheep, stating, "I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand" (John 10:28). The tragic failure of human leaders like Gedaliah to discern and act decisively upon warnings underscores the profound need for the perfect, omniscient, and discerning leadership of Christ, who "knew what was in man" (John 2:25) and could not be deceived by treacherous hearts. Furthermore, the idea of one being slain to prevent the perishing of many, though tragically misapplied and unfulfilled in this Old Testament context, finds its ultimate and redemptive fulfillment in the voluntary, perfect sacrifice of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). Jesus, unlike Ishmael, was not a treacherous plotter but the willing sacrifice, whose death on the cross secured the eternal preservation, gathering, and spiritual life of all who believe, forming the true, imperishable remnant of God's people, the Church, "purchased with His own blood" (Acts 20:28).

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 40 verses 7–16

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have in these verses,

I. A bright sky opening upon the remnant of the Jews that were left in their own land, and a comfortable prospect given them of some peace and quietness after the many years of trouble and terror with which they had been afflicted. Jeremiah indeed had never in his prophecies spoken of any such good days reserved for the Jews immediately after the captivity; but Providence seemed to raise and encourage such an expectation, and it would be to that miserable people as life from the dead. Observe the particulars.

1.Gedaliah, one of themselves, is made governor in the land, by the king of Babylon, Jer 40:7. To show that he designed to make and keep them easy he did not give this commission to one of the princes of Babylon, but to one of their brethren, who, they might be sure, would seek their peace. He was the son of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan, one of the princes. We read of his father (Jer 26:24) that he took Jeremiah's part against the people. He seems to have been a man of great wisdom and a mild temper, and under whose government the few that were left might have been very happy. The king of Babylon had a good opinion of him and reposed a confidence in him, for to him he committed all that were left behind.

2.There is great resort to him from all parts, and all those that were now the Jews of the dispersion came and put themselves under his government and protection. (1.) The great men that had escaped the Chaldeans by force came and quietly submitted to Gedaliah, for their own safety and common preservation. Several are here named, Jer 40:8. They came with their men, their servants, their soldiers, and so strengthened one another; and the king of Babylon had such a good opinion of Gedaliah his delegate that he was not at all jealous of the increase of their numbers, but rather pleased with it. (2.) The poor men that had escaped by flight into the neighbouring countries of Moab, Ammon, and Edom, were induced by the love they bore to their own land to return to it again as soon as they heard that Gedaliah was in authority there, Jer 40:11, Jer 40:12. Canaan itself would be an unsafe unpleasant country if there were no government nor governors there, and those that loved it dearly would not come back to it till they heard there were. It would be a great reviving to those that were dispersed to come together again, to those that were dispersed into foreign countries to come together in their own country, to those that were under strange kings to be under a governor of their own nation. See here in wrath God remembered mercy, and yet admitted some of them upon a further trial of their obedience.

3.The model of this new government is drawn up and settled by an original contract, which Gedaliah confirmed with an oath, a solemn oath (Jer 40:9): He swore to them and to their men, it is probably according to the warrant and instructions he had received from the king of Babylon, who empowered him to give them these assurances. (1.) They must own the property of their lands to be in the Chaldeans. "Come" (says Gedaliah), "fear not to serve the Chaldeans. Fear not the sin of it." Though the divine law had forbidden them to make leagues with the heathen, yet the divine sentence had obliged them to yield to the king of Babylon. "Fear not the reproach of it, and the disparagement it will be to your nation; it is what God has brought you to, has bound you to, and it is no disgrace to any to comply with him. Fear not the consequences of it, as if it would certainly make you and yours miserable; no, you will find the king of Babylon not so hard a landlord as you apprehend him to be; if you will but live peaceably, peaceably you shall live; disturb not the government, and it will not disturb you. Serve the king of Babylon and it shall be well with you." If they should make any difficulty of doing personal homage, or should be apprehensive of danger when the Chaldeans should come among them, Gedaliah, probably by instruction from the king of Babylon, undertakes upon all occasions to act for them, and make their application acceptable to the king (Jer 40:10): "As for me, behold, I will dwell at Mizpah, to serve the Chaldeans, to do homage to them in the name of the whole body if there be occasion, to receive orders, and to pay them their tribute when the come to us." All that passes between them and the Chaldeans shall pass through his hand; and, if the Chaldeans put such a confidence in him, surely his own countrymen may venture to do it. Gedaliah is willing thus to give them the assurance of an oath that he will do his part in protecting them, but, being apt to err (as many good men are) on the charitable side, he did not require an oath from them that they would be faithful to him, else the following mischief might have been prevented. However, protection draws allegiance though it be not sworn, and by joining in with Gedaliah they did, in effect, consent to the terms of government, that they should serve the king of Babylon. But, (2.) Though they own the property of their lands to be in the Chaldeans, yet, upon that condition, they shall have the free enjoyment of them and all the profits of them (Jer 40:10): "Gather you wine and summer fruits, and take them for your own use; put them in your vessels, to be laid up for winter-store, as those do that live in a land of peace and hope to eat the labour of your hand, nay, the labour of other people's hands, for you reap what they sowed." Or perhaps they were the spontaneous products of that fertile soil, for which none had laboured. And accordingly we find (Jer 40:12) that they gathered wine and summer fruits very much, such as were at present upon the ground, for their corn-harvest was over some time before Jerusalem was taken. While Gedaliah was in care for the public safety he left them to enjoy the advantages of the public plenty, and, for aught that appears, demanded no tribute from them; for he sought not his own profit, but the profit of many.

II. Here is a dark cloud gathering over this infant state, and threatening a dreadful storm. How soon is this hopeful prospect blasted! For when God begins in judgment he will make an end. It is here intimated to us, 1. That Baalis the king of the Ammonites had a particular spite at Gedaliah, and was contriving to take him off, either out of malice to the nation of the Jews, whose welfare he hated the thought of, or a personal pique against Gedaliah, Jer 40:14. Some make Baalis to signify the queen-mother of the king of the Ammonites, or queen-dowager, as if she were the first mover of the bloody and treacherous design. One would have thought this little remnant might be safe when the great king of Babylon protected it; and ye it is ruined by the artifices of this petty prince or princess. happy are those that have the King of kings of their side, who can take the wise in their own craftiness; for the greatest earthly king cannot with all his power secure us against fraud and treachery. 2. That he employed Ishmael, the son of Nethaniah, as the instrument of his malice, instigated him to murder Gedaliah, and, that he might have a fair opportunity to do it, directed him to go and enrol himself among his subjects and promise him fealty. Nothing could be more barbarous than the design itself, nor more base than the method of compassing it. How wretchedly is human nature corrupted and degenerated (even in those that pretend to the best blood) when it is capable of admitting the thought of such abominable wickedness! Ishmael was of the seed royal, and would therefore be easily tempted to envy and hate one that set up for a governor in Judah, who was not, as he was, of David's line, though he had ever so much of David's spirit. 3. That Johanan, a brisk and active man, having got scent of this plot, informed Gedaliah of it, yet taking it for granted he could not but know of it before, the proofs of the matter being so very plain: Dost thou certainly know? surely thou dost, Jer 40:14. He gave him private intelligence of it (Jer 40:15), hoping he would then take the more notice of it. He proffered his service to prevent it, by taking off Ishmael, whose very name was ominous to all the seed of Isaac: I will slay him. Wherefore should he slay thee? Herein he showed more courage and zeal than sense of justice; for, if it be lawful to kill for prevention, who then can be safe, since malice always suspects the worst? 4. That Gedaliah, being a man of sincerity himself, would by no means give credit to the information given him of Ishmael's treachery. He said, Thou speakest falsely of Ishmael. Herein he discovered more good humour than discretion, more of the innocency of the dove than the wisdom of the serpent. Princes become uneasy to themselves and all about them when they are jealous. Queen Elizabeth said that she would believe no more evil of her people than a mother would believe of her own children; yet many have been ruined by being over-confident of the fidelity of those about them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 7–16. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 40:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.