Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
But Gedaliah the son of Ahikam said unto Johanan the son of Kareah, Thou shalt not do this thing: for thou speakest falsely of Ishmael.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But Gedaliah H1436 the son H1121 of Ahikam H296 said H559 unto Johanan H3110 the son H1121 of Kareah H7143, Thou shalt not do H6213 this thing H1697: for thou speakest H1696 falsely H8267 of Ishmael H3458.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
But G'dalyahu the son of Achikam said to Yochanan the son of Kareach, "Don't do it. What you are saying about Yishma'el is not true."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But Gedaliah son of Ahikam said to Johanan son of Kareah, “Do not do such a thing! What you are saying about Ishmael is a lie.”
Ask
American Standard Version
But Gedaliah the son of Ahikam said unto Johanan the son of Kareah, Thou shalt not do this thing; for thou speakest falsely of Ishmael.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
But Gedaliah the son of Ahikam said to Yochanan the son of Kareah, You shall not do this thing; for you speak falsely of Ishmael.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But Gedaliah the sonne of Ahikam said vnto Iohanan the sonne of Kareah, Thou shalt not doe this thing: for thou speakest falsely of Ishmael.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Gedaliah son of Ahikam saith unto Johanan son of Kareah, `Thou dost not do this thing, for falsehood thou art speaking concerning Ishmael.'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 19,958 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 40:16 captures a moment of profound and tragic misjudgment as Gedaliah, the newly appointed Babylonian governor over the remnant of Judah, adamantly rejects the urgent and truthful warning from Johanan son of Kareah regarding Ishmael's imminent murderous plot. This pivotal exchange reveals Gedaliah's fatal naiveté and his refusal to acknowledge a clear and present danger, thereby setting the stage for his assassination and the subsequent further dispersion and suffering of the Jewish people who had remained in the land after the devastating fall of Jerusalem.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse serves as the dramatic climax of a tense and critical dialogue between Johanan and Gedaliah. In the preceding verses, specifically Jeremiah 40:13-14, Johanan approaches Gedaliah with an explicit and urgent intelligence report: Ishmael son of Nethaniah, a man of royal lineage, has been dispatched by Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, with the specific intent to assassinate Gedaliah. Johanan, demonstrating his loyalty and foresight, even offers to preemptively eliminate Ishmael to avert this catastrophe and preserve the fragile peace and stability that Gedaliah was attempting to establish. Gedaliah's response in Jeremiah 40:16 is a categorical and unequivocal rejection of this vital intelligence, accusing Johanan of outright falsehood. The narrative immediately following, in Jeremiah 41:1-3, tragically and swiftly confirms the absolute accuracy of Johanan's dire warning, as Ishmael indeed carries out the assassination, plunging the vulnerable remnant into even deeper chaos, fear, and further displacement.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The historical backdrop for Jeremiah 40:16 is the immediate aftermath of the final Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem in 586 BC, a period of immense national trauma and upheaval. King Nebuchadnezzar, having destroyed the city and temple, appointed Gedaliah as governor over the impoverished remnant left behind in Judah. Gedaliah, whose father Ahikam had previously protected Jeremiah (Jeremiah 26:24), was tasked with maintaining order, encouraging agricultural production, and ensuring loyalty to Babylon. This appointment, however, occurred within a highly volatile political landscape. Ishmael, being of Davidic royal descent, likely harbored deep resentment towards Gedaliah, a non-royal appointee, and sought to reclaim power for himself, even if it meant conspiring with foreign enemies like the Ammonites under King Baalis. This era was characterized by profound national despair, internal power struggles, and a desperate, often misguided, search for security amidst the ruins of a once-proud kingdom.
  • Key Themes: Jeremiah 40:16 contributes profoundly to several enduring themes woven throughout the book of Jeremiah and the broader biblical narrative. Most prominently, it starkly illustrates the danger of ignoring truthful warnings, a recurring and tragic motif in Jeremiah where the people's persistent rejection of God's prophetic messages inevitably led to divine judgment (e.g., the powerful warnings in Jeremiah 7 that went unheeded). The verse also highlights the pervasive theme of human shortsightedness and a critical lack of discernment, particularly evident in leadership. Gedaliah's catastrophic failure to accurately perceive Ishmael's true character and malevolent intentions, despite clear and urgent evidence, leads directly to devastating consequences, mirroring the broader national failure to discern and obey God's will. Furthermore, the passage underscores the painful theme of betrayal and treachery within the covenant community itself, demonstrating the ongoing brokenness of human relationships and the depths of sin, even after severe national judgment.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Gedaliah (Hebrew, Gᵉdalyâh', H1436): From H1436, meaning "Jah has become great." Gedaliah was the son of Ahikam (H296), a respected figure who had previously demonstrated courage by protecting the prophet Jeremiah. His name, a declaration of Yahweh's greatness, stands in poignant and tragic contrast to his ultimate fate. His failure to heed a crucial warning, despite his noble lineage and seemingly divine name, highlights the vulnerability of even well-intentioned leaders to human folly and the machinations of evil, leading to a demise that profoundly impacted the remnant of Judah.
  • do (Hebrew, ʻâsâh', H6213): From H6213, a primitive root meaning "to do or make, to accomplish, to act." In this context, Gedaliah's command "Thou shalt not do this thing" is a forceful prohibition against Johanan's proposed action to eliminate Ishmael. The word emphasizes the concrete nature of Johanan's offer—to perform an act of pre-emptive justice—and Gedaliah's absolute refusal to allow such an action, thereby sealing his own fate by preventing the necessary intervention.
  • falsely (Hebrew, sheqer', H8267): From H8267, meaning "an untruth, falsehood, or deception." This word is central to understanding Gedaliah's fatal error. By declaring Johanan's report as sheqer, Gedaliah not only dismisses the warning as untrue but also impugns Johanan's character, accusing him of intentionally fabricating a lie about Ishmael. This profound misjudgment of the truth, and of the characters of both the loyal Johanan and the treacherous Ishmael, proved to be the direct cause of Gedaliah's undoing and the renewed suffering of the Jewish remnant.

Verse Breakdown

  • "But Gedaliah the son of Ahikam said unto Johanan the son of Kareah,": This opening clause sets the scene for the critical confrontation, introducing the two primary figures. Gedaliah, identified by his father Ahikam (a man known for his integrity), holds the precarious position of Babylonian-appointed governor, representing the fragile hope for stability. Johanan, identified by his father Kareah, is a military leader who has discerned a grave threat and acts with urgent loyalty to warn Gedaliah. The mention of their paternal lineage grounds them within the social and political fabric of the post-exilic community.
  • "Thou shalt not do this thing:": This is Gedaliah's direct, unequivocal command, a powerful prohibition against Johanan's proposed course of action. The "thing" refers to Johanan's offer in the preceding verses to assassinate Ishmael to prevent Gedaliah's own murder. Gedaliah's statement here is an absolute veto, demonstrating his firm conviction and leaving no room for further discussion or consideration of the intelligence presented to him, highlighting his overconfidence or naivete.
  • "for thou speakest falsely of Ishmael.": This concluding clause provides Gedaliah's explicit justification for his dismissal of Johanan's warning. He directly accuses Johanan of lying about Ishmael, indicating a complete and fatal lack of belief in the conspiracy. This statement reveals Gedaliah's tragic inability or unwillingness to discern the truth, perhaps stemming from a misplaced trust in Ishmael, a naive desire to avoid further bloodshed, or an underestimation of the deep-seated resentments and political machinations at play.

Literary Devices

Jeremiah 40:16 is permeated with profound Dramatic Irony. The audience, having been informed of Johanan's accurate warning in the preceding verses and knowing the subsequent tragic events detailed in Jeremiah 41, possesses crucial information that Gedaliah tragically lacks. This creates a powerful sense of foreboding and underscores the devastating consequences of Gedaliah's fatal error. The verse also employs potent Foreshadowing, as Gedaliah's obstinate dismissal of the warning directly and inevitably leads to the fulfillment of Ishmael's murderous plot, signaling the impending disaster for the already suffering remnant. Furthermore, a stark Contrast is drawn between Johanan's clear-sightedness, urgent concern for Gedaliah's life, and his pragmatic desire to protect the community's welfare, and Gedaliah's naive trust, dismissive attitude, and ultimately, his catastrophic misjudgment.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 40:16 stands as a potent theological cautionary tale, powerfully illustrating the dire consequences of failing to discern truth from falsehood, particularly when critical warnings are issued. Gedaliah's dismissal of Johanan's accurate intelligence, seemingly rooted in a misplaced trust or a naive desire for peace, underscores the spiritual and practical imperative of discernment. In a world perpetually fraught with deception and genuine threats, both personal and communal, the capacity to "test the spirits" and critically evaluate information is not merely a practical skill but a foundational spiritual discipline. This narrative highlights that ignoring truth, even when it is unpleasant or challenging to accept, can lead to devastating outcomes, mirroring the broader biblical theme of humanity's persistent rejection of God's warnings, which inevitably leads to judgment and suffering.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Gedaliah's tragic misjudgment in Jeremiah 40:16 offers a timeless and sobering lesson on the critical importance of discernment and the profound perils of naivete, especially for those entrusted with leadership or influence. It compels us to honestly examine our own tendencies: do we, like Gedaliah, dismiss warnings too readily, perhaps out of a desire for comfort, a reluctance to confront difficult truths, or an unfounded trust in others? This narrative challenges us to actively cultivate a spirit of wisdom, diligently seeking to understand situations fully and to weigh counsel carefully, even when the message is uncomfortable or runs counter to our preconceived notions. It serves as a powerful reminder that true peace and security often necessitate confronting unpleasant realities and making difficult, decisive choices, rather than simply wishing problems away or ignoring potential threats. For individuals, this means cultivating vigilance against deception in all its forms; for leaders, it profoundly underscores the grave responsibility of protecting those under their care by exercising keen judgment, seeking wise counsel, and acting decisively when danger is present.

Questions for Reflection

  • When have I dismissed a warning, either from others or from my own conscience, only to regret it later?
  • What factors (e.g., desire for peace, personal bias, overconfidence, fear of conflict) might prevent me from discerning truth from falsehood in difficult situations?
  • How can I cultivate a greater spirit of discernment in my daily life, in my relationships, and in any leadership roles I may hold?
  • What is the healthy balance between extending trust to others and maintaining a necessary, discerning skepticism, especially when dealing with potential threats or conflicting information?

FAQ

Why was Gedaliah so unwilling to believe Johanan's warning about Ishmael?

Answer: The biblical text does not explicitly detail Gedaliah's internal reasoning, but several plausible factors can be inferred. He may have been genuinely naive or overly optimistic, deeply desiring to establish peace and stability for the remnant of Judah after the Babylonian conquest, and thus profoundly reluctant to believe in such immediate and devastating treachery. It's also possible he held a misplaced trust in Ishmael, perhaps due to Ishmael's royal lineage or a personal relationship, finding it difficult to conceive of such a profound betrayal from someone within his own community. Alternatively, Gedaliah might have been wary of internal power struggles among the Jewish leaders and feared that Johanan's warning was a calculated ploy to eliminate a rival for influence. His emphatic dismissal, "thou speakest falsely," suggests a deep-seated conviction that Johanan was intentionally lying, rather than simply being mistaken. This tragic misjudgment ultimately proved fatal, as Jeremiah 41:1-3 tragically confirms Johanan's warning was chillingly accurate.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Gedaliah's tragic failure to discern truth from falsehood, leading directly to his demise and further suffering for his people, stands in stark and illuminating contrast to the perfect discernment and unwavering truth embodied by Jesus Christ. While Gedaliah dismissed a genuine warning as a lie, Jesus is the very embodiment of truth, the one who perfectly knows the hearts of all humanity and cannot be deceived. He consistently exposed the hypocrisy, false motives, and hidden agendas of His adversaries, even when they outwardly appeared righteous, as powerfully demonstrated in His scathing confrontations with the Pharisees and scribes (e.g., Matthew 23). Furthermore, Christ Himself gave clear, authoritative warnings about future events, about the true nature of the Kingdom of God, and about the spiritual dangers and deceptions that His followers would inevitably face (e.g., the Olivet Discourse in Matthew 24). Unlike Gedaliah's ill-fated rejection of a true warning that brought destruction, those who heed Christ's words find not only life but eternal salvation, for He definitively declared, "I am the way, the truth, and the life" (John 14:6). His perfect discernment, unwavering commitment to truth, and ultimate victory over deception provide the ultimate security and infallible guidance that Gedaliah tragically lacked, offering a sure foundation and enduring hope in a world still prone to betrayal and falsehood.

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 40 verses 7–16

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have in these verses,

I. A bright sky opening upon the remnant of the Jews that were left in their own land, and a comfortable prospect given them of some peace and quietness after the many years of trouble and terror with which they had been afflicted. Jeremiah indeed had never in his prophecies spoken of any such good days reserved for the Jews immediately after the captivity; but Providence seemed to raise and encourage such an expectation, and it would be to that miserable people as life from the dead. Observe the particulars.

1.Gedaliah, one of themselves, is made governor in the land, by the king of Babylon, Jer 40:7. To show that he designed to make and keep them easy he did not give this commission to one of the princes of Babylon, but to one of their brethren, who, they might be sure, would seek their peace. He was the son of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan, one of the princes. We read of his father (Jer 26:24) that he took Jeremiah's part against the people. He seems to have been a man of great wisdom and a mild temper, and under whose government the few that were left might have been very happy. The king of Babylon had a good opinion of him and reposed a confidence in him, for to him he committed all that were left behind.

2.There is great resort to him from all parts, and all those that were now the Jews of the dispersion came and put themselves under his government and protection. (1.) The great men that had escaped the Chaldeans by force came and quietly submitted to Gedaliah, for their own safety and common preservation. Several are here named, Jer 40:8. They came with their men, their servants, their soldiers, and so strengthened one another; and the king of Babylon had such a good opinion of Gedaliah his delegate that he was not at all jealous of the increase of their numbers, but rather pleased with it. (2.) The poor men that had escaped by flight into the neighbouring countries of Moab, Ammon, and Edom, were induced by the love they bore to their own land to return to it again as soon as they heard that Gedaliah was in authority there, Jer 40:11, Jer 40:12. Canaan itself would be an unsafe unpleasant country if there were no government nor governors there, and those that loved it dearly would not come back to it till they heard there were. It would be a great reviving to those that were dispersed to come together again, to those that were dispersed into foreign countries to come together in their own country, to those that were under strange kings to be under a governor of their own nation. See here in wrath God remembered mercy, and yet admitted some of them upon a further trial of their obedience.

3.The model of this new government is drawn up and settled by an original contract, which Gedaliah confirmed with an oath, a solemn oath (Jer 40:9): He swore to them and to their men, it is probably according to the warrant and instructions he had received from the king of Babylon, who empowered him to give them these assurances. (1.) They must own the property of their lands to be in the Chaldeans. "Come" (says Gedaliah), "fear not to serve the Chaldeans. Fear not the sin of it." Though the divine law had forbidden them to make leagues with the heathen, yet the divine sentence had obliged them to yield to the king of Babylon. "Fear not the reproach of it, and the disparagement it will be to your nation; it is what God has brought you to, has bound you to, and it is no disgrace to any to comply with him. Fear not the consequences of it, as if it would certainly make you and yours miserable; no, you will find the king of Babylon not so hard a landlord as you apprehend him to be; if you will but live peaceably, peaceably you shall live; disturb not the government, and it will not disturb you. Serve the king of Babylon and it shall be well with you." If they should make any difficulty of doing personal homage, or should be apprehensive of danger when the Chaldeans should come among them, Gedaliah, probably by instruction from the king of Babylon, undertakes upon all occasions to act for them, and make their application acceptable to the king (Jer 40:10): "As for me, behold, I will dwell at Mizpah, to serve the Chaldeans, to do homage to them in the name of the whole body if there be occasion, to receive orders, and to pay them their tribute when the come to us." All that passes between them and the Chaldeans shall pass through his hand; and, if the Chaldeans put such a confidence in him, surely his own countrymen may venture to do it. Gedaliah is willing thus to give them the assurance of an oath that he will do his part in protecting them, but, being apt to err (as many good men are) on the charitable side, he did not require an oath from them that they would be faithful to him, else the following mischief might have been prevented. However, protection draws allegiance though it be not sworn, and by joining in with Gedaliah they did, in effect, consent to the terms of government, that they should serve the king of Babylon. But, (2.) Though they own the property of their lands to be in the Chaldeans, yet, upon that condition, they shall have the free enjoyment of them and all the profits of them (Jer 40:10): "Gather you wine and summer fruits, and take them for your own use; put them in your vessels, to be laid up for winter-store, as those do that live in a land of peace and hope to eat the labour of your hand, nay, the labour of other people's hands, for you reap what they sowed." Or perhaps they were the spontaneous products of that fertile soil, for which none had laboured. And accordingly we find (Jer 40:12) that they gathered wine and summer fruits very much, such as were at present upon the ground, for their corn-harvest was over some time before Jerusalem was taken. While Gedaliah was in care for the public safety he left them to enjoy the advantages of the public plenty, and, for aught that appears, demanded no tribute from them; for he sought not his own profit, but the profit of many.

II. Here is a dark cloud gathering over this infant state, and threatening a dreadful storm. How soon is this hopeful prospect blasted! For when God begins in judgment he will make an end. It is here intimated to us, 1. That Baalis the king of the Ammonites had a particular spite at Gedaliah, and was contriving to take him off, either out of malice to the nation of the Jews, whose welfare he hated the thought of, or a personal pique against Gedaliah, Jer 40:14. Some make Baalis to signify the queen-mother of the king of the Ammonites, or queen-dowager, as if she were the first mover of the bloody and treacherous design. One would have thought this little remnant might be safe when the great king of Babylon protected it; and ye it is ruined by the artifices of this petty prince or princess. happy are those that have the King of kings of their side, who can take the wise in their own craftiness; for the greatest earthly king cannot with all his power secure us against fraud and treachery. 2. That he employed Ishmael, the son of Nethaniah, as the instrument of his malice, instigated him to murder Gedaliah, and, that he might have a fair opportunity to do it, directed him to go and enrol himself among his subjects and promise him fealty. Nothing could be more barbarous than the design itself, nor more base than the method of compassing it. How wretchedly is human nature corrupted and degenerated (even in those that pretend to the best blood) when it is capable of admitting the thought of such abominable wickedness! Ishmael was of the seed royal, and would therefore be easily tempted to envy and hate one that set up for a governor in Judah, who was not, as he was, of David's line, though he had ever so much of David's spirit. 3. That Johanan, a brisk and active man, having got scent of this plot, informed Gedaliah of it, yet taking it for granted he could not but know of it before, the proofs of the matter being so very plain: Dost thou certainly know? surely thou dost, Jer 40:14. He gave him private intelligence of it (Jer 40:15), hoping he would then take the more notice of it. He proffered his service to prevent it, by taking off Ishmael, whose very name was ominous to all the seed of Isaac: I will slay him. Wherefore should he slay thee? Herein he showed more courage and zeal than sense of justice; for, if it be lawful to kill for prevention, who then can be safe, since malice always suspects the worst? 4. That Gedaliah, being a man of sincerity himself, would by no means give credit to the information given him of Ishmael's treachery. He said, Thou speakest falsely of Ishmael. Herein he discovered more good humour than discretion, more of the innocency of the dove than the wisdom of the serpent. Princes become uneasy to themselves and all about them when they are jealous. Queen Elizabeth said that she would believe no more evil of her people than a mother would believe of her own children; yet many have been ruined by being over-confident of the fidelity of those about them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 7–16. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 40:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.