James 2:2

Translation
King James Version
For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment;
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
For G1063 if G1437 there come G1525 unto G1519 your G5216 assembly G4864 a man G435 with a gold ring G5554, in G1722 goodly G2986 apparel G2066, and G1161 there come in G1525 also G2532 a poor man G4434 in G1722 vile G4508 raiment G2066;
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Suppose a man comes into your synagogue wearing gold rings and fancy clothes, and also a poor man comes in dressed in rags.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Suppose a man comes into your meeting wearing a gold ring and fine clothes, and a poor man in shabby clothes also comes in.
Ask
American Standard Version
For if there come into your synagogue a man with a gold ring, in fine clothing, and there come in also a poor man in vile clothing;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
For if a man with a gold ring, in fine clothing, comes into your synagogue, and a poor man in filthy clothing also comes in;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
For if there come into your company a man with a golde ring, and in goodly apparell, and there come in also a poore man in vile raiment,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
for if there may come into your synagogue a man with gold ring, in gay raiment, and there may come in also a poor man in vile raiment,
Ask
See also
Luke 15:22Esther 8:2Esther 3:10Matthew 11:8Matthew 11:9Zechariah 3:3Zechariah 3:4
In the KJVVerse 30,296 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

James 2:2 presents a vivid hypothetical scenario within an early Christian gathering, illustrating the pervasive problem of partiality. It describes the entry of two individuals: one adorned with symbols of wealth and high status, and another appearing in shabby, humble attire. This stark contrast immediately sets the stage for James's powerful rebuke against discrimination based on socioeconomic standing, serving as a foundational example for his subsequent exhortation against showing favoritism within the community of faith.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: James 2:2 is the immediate follow-up to the thesis statement presented in James 2:1, where James explicitly commands believers not to hold the faith of Jesus Christ, their Lord of glory, with partiality. This verse then provides a concrete, illustrative example of the very sin he is condemning. The scenario continues into James 2:3 and James 2:4, where the assembly's preferential treatment of the wealthy man and disdain for the poor man is described, leading to James's direct accusation of "judging with evil thoughts." The entire passage from James 2:1-13 forms a cohesive unit addressing the sin of favoritism in light of the "royal law" to love one's neighbor.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the Greco-Roman world of the first century, social stratification was deeply ingrained, and outward appearance, particularly clothing and jewelry, was a primary indicator of wealth, status, and honor. People were accustomed to showing deference to the rich and powerful, often seeking their patronage. Early Christian communities, while revolutionary in their theology of equality, were not immune to these societal pressures. The term "assembly" (Greek: synagōgē) suggests that early Christian gatherings might have occurred in or resembled Jewish synagogues, where social hierarchies could also be observed. The vivid contrast between a man with a "gold ring" and "goodly apparel" versus a "poor man in vile raiment" would have been immediately recognizable to James's audience as representing the extremes of their social spectrum, highlighting a common temptation to honor the former and disregard the latter.

  • Key Themes: This verse introduces and powerfully illustrates several key themes central to the Epistle of James and Christian ethics. The most prominent is the condemnation of partiality and favoritism, particularly based on wealth. James argues that such discrimination is fundamentally incompatible with genuine faith in Christ, who himself embraced the marginalized. This leads to the theme of radical equality in Christ, emphasizing that all believers, regardless of their worldly status, are equally valued and loved by God, and thus should be treated with equal dignity within the church. This principle is echoed in passages like Galatians 3:28 which declares that in Christ "there is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female." Finally, the scenario underscores the theme of authentic faith versus mere outward profession. True faith, according to James, is not just intellectual assent but is demonstrated through ethical action, including impartial love and justice for all, especially the vulnerable, as further elaborated in James 2:14-26.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • assembly (Greek, synagōgē', G4864): This term, commonly translated as "synagogue," refers to an "assemblage of persons," specifically a Jewish meeting place or congregation. Its use here for a Christian gathering highlights the continuity with Jewish practices and possibly suggests that early believers met in or adapted the structure of synagogues. It emphasizes that the sin of partiality is occurring within the very heart of the gathered community of faith.
  • gold ring (Greek, chrysodaktýlios', G5554): Literally meaning "gold-ringed," this compound word denotes someone "wearing a golden finger-ring or similar jewelry." In the ancient world, gold rings were not merely decorative but potent symbols of wealth, social status, and often, official position or authority. The presence of such an item immediately signals the man's high standing and affluence, setting him apart from the common person.
  • vile (Greek, rhyparós', G4508): Derived from a word meaning "dirt," rhyparós describes something as "dirty, i.e. (relatively) cheap or shabby; morally, wicked." When applied to "raiment," it vividly portrays clothing that is squalid, filthy, or utterly worn out, indicating extreme poverty and low social standing. The stark contrast with "goodly apparel" (Greek: lamprós esthḗs, "radiant, magnificent clothing") underscores the vast socioeconomic chasm between the two individuals.

Verse Breakdown

  • "For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel,": This clause introduces the first hypothetical visitor, a man whose appearance immediately signals wealth and high social status. The "gold ring" and "goodly apparel" (splendid, bright clothing) are not just fashion choices but powerful non-verbal cues in the ancient world, demanding respect and preferential treatment according to societal norms. James sets up a situation where the community's natural inclination would be to honor such an individual.
  • "and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment;": This second clause presents the stark contrast, introducing a second visitor whose appearance marks him as impoverished and of low social standing. "Vile raiment" (shabby, dirty, or worn-out clothing) would immediately identify him as someone typically disregarded or even disdained in society. The conjunction "and" (Greek: dé) emphasizes the simultaneous arrival, creating an immediate dilemma for the assembly regarding how to treat these two vastly different individuals.

Literary Devices

James employs several effective literary devices in this verse. The primary device is the Hypothetical Scenario, which allows him to present a common, relatable situation without directly accusing his audience, thereby inviting them to self-reflection. This is immediately followed by a powerful Juxtaposition or Antithesis, sharply contrasting the "man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel" with the "poor man in vile raiment." This creates a vivid mental image of extreme social disparity. Furthermore, Symbolism is at play, where the "gold ring" and "goodly apparel" symbolize wealth, status, and worldly honor, while "vile raiment" symbolizes poverty, low esteem, and marginalization. These symbols are not merely descriptive but serve to highlight the external markers by which people are often judged, setting the stage for James's critique of such superficial evaluation.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

James 2:2 serves as a foundational illustration for the profound theological truth that God shows no partiality, and therefore, His people must reflect His character. The sin of favoritism, particularly towards the wealthy, directly contradicts the very nature of God, who is just and righteous, and who consistently demonstrates a special concern for the poor and oppressed throughout Scripture. To discriminate based on external markers like wealth is to deny the inherent dignity of every person, created in God's image, and to undermine the radical equality established by Christ's redemptive work. It also betrays the "royal law" of love, which demands that believers love their neighbor as themselves, irrespective of social standing.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

James 2:2 offers a timeless and piercing challenge to believers and the church today. It compels us to critically examine our own hearts and the practices of our communities: Do we, consciously or unconsciously, give preference to those who appear successful, affluent, or influential, while overlooking or marginalizing the humble, the struggling, or the outwardly unimpressive? The "gold ring" and "vile raiment" may manifest differently in contemporary society—perhaps in designer clothes versus worn-out attire, or in professional titles versus lack of employment—but the underlying temptation to judge based on external appearance or socioeconomic status remains. True Christian love and hospitality demand that we extend genuine warmth, honor, and equal respect to every person, recognizing their intrinsic worth as image-bearers of God and fellow heirs in Christ, regardless of their worldly standing. Our assemblies should be places where all are welcomed and valued, reflecting the inclusive love of Christ himself.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what subtle or overt ways might partiality manifest in my own life or within my church community today?
  • How does my personal interaction with people of different socioeconomic backgrounds reflect or contradict the principles taught in James 2:2?
  • What practical steps can I, and my church, take to ensure that all individuals, especially the marginalized, feel equally welcomed and valued in our gatherings?

FAQ

What does "assembly" (synagōgē) signify in this context, and why is it important?

Answer: The term "assembly" here is the Greek word synagōgē, which literally means "a gathering" or "a coming together." In the New Testament, it most commonly refers to a Jewish synagogue, a place of worship and community gathering. James's use of this term for a Christian gathering suggests that early Christian communities often met in settings similar to or directly influenced by Jewish synagogues. This is important because it highlights that the sin of partiality was occurring within the sacred space of communal worship and fellowship. It underscores that the church, as God's gathered people, is called to embody a different set of values than the world, where social status often dictates treatment. The issue isn't just about personal bias, but about how the community's actions reflect its understanding of the faith of Jesus Christ.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

James 2:2, by exposing the sin of partiality, powerfully anticipates and reflects the very heart of Christ's ministry and the nature of His Kingdom. Jesus consistently defied societal norms by associating with and elevating the marginalized, the poor, and the outcast. He taught that true greatness in His Kingdom is found in humble service, not in worldly status or wealth (e.g., Matthew 20:26-28). His inaugural sermon in Luke 4:18-19 explicitly declared His mission to preach good news to the poor and set the oppressed free. Ultimately, Christ's death and resurrection broke down all dividing walls (as described in Ephesians 2:14), creating a new humanity where distinctions of race, social status, or gender are transcended by unity in Him (as articulated in Galatians 3:28). Therefore, the call to impartiality in James 2:2 is not merely an ethical command but a direct outworking of the gospel, reflecting the inclusive, self-giving love of the Lamb of God who embraced all humanity, regardless of their "raiment" or "rings."

Copy as

Commentary on James 2 verses 1–7

The apostle is here reproving a very corrupt practice. He shows how much mischief there is in the sin of prosōpolēpsia - respect of persons, which seemed to be a very growing evil in the churches of Christ even in those early ages, and which, in these after-times, has sadly corrupted and divided Christian nations and societies. Here we have,

I. A caution against this sin laid down in general: My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons, Jam 2:1. Observe here, 1. The character of Christians fully implied: they are such as have the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ; they embrace it; they receive it; they govern themselves by it; they entertain the doctrine, and submit to the law and government, of Christ; they have it as a trust; they have it as a treasure. 2. How honorably James speaks of Jesus Christ; he calls him the Lord of glory; for he is the brightness of his Father's glory, and the express image of his person. 3. Christ's being the Lord of glory should teach us not to respect Christians for any thing so much as their relation and conformity to Christ. You who profess to believe the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ, which the poorest Christian shall partake of equally with the rich, and to which all worldly glory is but vanity, you should not make men's outward and worldly advantages the measure of your respect. In professing the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, we should not show respect to men, so as to cloud or lessen the glory of our glorious Lord: how ever any may think of it, this is certainly a very heinous sin.

II. We have this sin described and cautioned against, by an instance or example of it (Jam 2:2, Jam 2:3): For if there come into your assembly a man with a gold ring, etc. Assembly here is meant of those meetings which were appointed for deciding matters of difference among the members of the church, or for determining when censures should be passed upon any, and what those censures should be; therefore the Greek word here used, sunagōgē, signifies such an assembly as that in the Jewish synagogues, when they met to do justice. Maimonides says (as I find the passage quoted by Dr. Manton) "That is was expressly provided by the Jews' constitutions that, when a poor man and a rich plead together, the rich shall not be bidden to sit down and the poor stand, or sit in a worse place, but both sit or both stand alike." To this the phrases used by the apostle have a most plain reference, and therefore the assembly here spoken of must be some such as the synagogue-assemblies of the Jews were, when they met to hear causes and to execute justice: to these the arbitrations and censures of their Christian assemblies are compared. But we must be careful not to apply what is here said to the common assemblies for worship; for in these certainly there may be appointed different places of persons according to their rank and circumstances, without sin. Those do not understand the apostle who fix his severity here upon this practice; they do not consider the word judges (used in Jam 2:4), nor what is said of their being convected as transgressors of the law, if they had such a respect of persons as is here spoken of, according to Jam 2:9. Thus, now put the case: "There comes into your assembly (when of the same nature with some of those at the synagogue) a man that is distinguished by his dress, and who makes a figure, and there comes in also a poor man in vile raiment, and you act partially, and determine wrong, merely because the one makes a better appearance, or is in better circumstances, than the other." Observe hence, 1. God has his remnant among all sorts of people, among those that wear soft and gay clothing, and among those that wear poor and vile raiment. 2. In matters of religion, rich and poor stand upon a level; no man's riches set him in the least nearer to God, nor does any man's poverty set him at a distance from God. With the Most High there is no respect of persons, and therefore in matters of conscience there should be none with us. 3. All undue honouring of worldly greatness and riches should especially be watched against in Christian societies. James does not here encourage rudeness or disorder. Civil respect must be paid, and some difference may be allowed in our carriage towards persons of different ranks; but this respect must never be such as to influence the proceedings of Christian societies in disposing of the offices of the church, or in passing the censures of the church, or in any thing that is purely a matter of religion; here we are to know no man after the flesh. It is the character of a citizen of Zion that in his eyes a vile person is contemned, but he honoureth those that fear the Lord. If a poor man be a good man, we must not value him a whit the less for his poverty; and, if a rich man be a bad man (though he may have both gay clothing and a gay profession), we must not value him any whit the more for his riches. 4. Of what importance it is to take care what rule we go by in judging of men; if we allow ourselves commonly to judge by outward appearance, this will too much influence our spirits and our conduct in religious assemblies. There is many a man, whose wickedness renders him vile and despicable, who yet makes a figure in the world; and, on the other hand, there is many a humble, heavenly, good Christian, who is clothed meanly; but neither should he nor his Christianity be thought the worse of on this account.

III. We have the greatness of this sin set forth, Jam 2:4, Jam 2:5. It is great partiality, it is injustice, and it is to set ourselves against God, who has chosen the poor, and will honour and advance them (if good), let who will despise them. 1. In this sin there is shameful partiality: Are you not then partial in yourselves? The question is here put, as what could not fail of being answered by every man's conscience that would put it seriously to himself. According to the strict rendering of the original, the question is, "Have you not made a difference? And, in that difference, do you not judge by a false rule, and go upon false measures? And does not the charge of a partiality condemned by the law lie fully against you? Does not your own conscience tell you that you are guilty?" Appeals to conscience are of great advantage, when we have to do with such as make a profession, even though they may have fallen into a very corrupt state. 2. This respect of persons is owing to the evil and injustice of the thoughts. As the temper, conduct, and proceedings, are partial, so the heart and thoughts, from which all flows, are evil: "You have become judges of evil thoughts; that is, you are judges according to those unjust estimations and corrupt opinions which you have formed to yourselves. Trace your partiality till you come to those hidden thoughts which accompany and support it, and you will find those to be exceedingly evil. You secretly prefer outward pomp before inward grace, and the things that are seen before those which are not seen." The deformity of sin is never truly and fully discerned till the evil of our thoughts be disclosed: and it is this which highly aggravates the faults of our tempers and lives - that the imagination of the thoughts of the heart is evil, Gen 6:5. 3. This respect of persons is a heinous sin, because it is to show ourselves most directly contrary to God (Jam 2:5): "Hath not God chosen the poor of this world, rich in faith? etc. But you have despised them, Jam 2:6. God has made those heirs of a kingdom whom you make of no reputation, and has given very great and glorious promises to those to whom you can hardly give a good word or a respectful look. And is not this a monstrous iniquity in you who pretend to be the children of God and conformed to him? Hearken, my beloved brethren; by all the love I have for you, and all the regards you have to me, I beg you would consider these things. Take notice that many of the poor of this world are the chosen of God. Their being God's chosen does not prevent their being poor; their being poor does not at all prejudice the evidences of their being chosen. Mat 11:5, The poor are evangelized." God designed to recommend his holy religion to men's esteem and affection, not by the external advantages of gaiety and pomp, but by its intrinsic worth and excellency; and therefore chose the poor of this world. Again, take notice that many poor of the world are rich in faith; thus the poorest may become rich; and this is what they ought to be especially ambitious of. It is expected from those who have wealth and estates that they be rich in good works, because the more they have the more they have to do good with; but it is expected from the poor in the world that they be rich in faith, for the less they have here the more they may, and should, live in the believing expectation of better things in a better world. Take notice further, Believing Christians are rich in title, and in being heirs of a kingdom, though they may be very poor as to present possessions. What is laid out upon them is but little; what is laid up for them is unspeakably rich and great. Note again, Where any are rich in faith, there will be also divine love; faith working by love will be in all the heirs of glory. Note once more, under this head, Heaven is a kingdom, and a kingdom promised to those that love God. We read of the crown promised to those that love God, in the former chapter (Jam 2:12); we here find there is a kingdom too. And, as the crown is a crown of life, so the kingdom will be an everlasting kingdom. All these things, laid together, show how highly the poor in this world, if rich in faith, are now honoured, and shall hereafter be advanced by God; and consequently how very sinful a thing it was for them to despise the poor. After such considerations as these, the charge is cutting indeed: But you have despised the poor, Jam 2:6. 4. Respecting persons, in the sense of this place, on account of their riches or outward figure, is shown to be a very great sin, because of the mischiefs which are owing to worldly wealth and greatness, and the folly which there is in Christians' paying undue regards to those who had so little regard either to their God or them: "Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment-seat? Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by which you are called? Jam 2:7. Consider how commonly riches are the incentives of vice and mischief, of blasphemy and persecution: consider how many calamities you yourselves sustain, and how great reproaches are thrown upon your religion and your God by men of wealth, and power, and worldly greatness; and this will make your sin appear exceedingly sinful and foolish, in setting up that which tends to pull you down, and to destroy all that you are building up, and to dishonour that worthy name by which you are called." The name of Christ is a worthy name; it reflects honour, and gives worth to those who wear it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–7. Public domain.
Copy as
Augustine of HippoAD 430
Confessions 8.4.9
Far from me is the notion that in your tabernacle, Lord, the rich should be more highly regarded than the poor, or the noble than the less well-born. You have chosen the weak things of this world to put the strong to shame, and you have chosen things which are dishonorable, despised and of no account, in order to bring to nothing the things which are.
Hilary of ArlesAD 449
INTRODUCTORY TRACTATE ON THE LETTER OF JAMES
What James says here applies not just to rings but to any sign of wealth, for the ring is meant to stand for a treasure house of riches.
BedeAD 735
Commentary on the Catholic Epistles
For if there comes into your assembly a man with a gold ring, in fine clothing, and there also comes in a poor man in shabby clothing, and you pay attention to the one who wears the fine clothing and say, "You sit here in a good place," while you say to the poor man, "You stand over there," or "Sit down at my feet." In this exposition of the sentence let us use the words of blessed Augustine. "If," he says, "we refer this difference of sitting and standing to ecclesiastical honors, it must not be thought a small sin to have the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ of glory with partiality. For who can tolerate that a rich man should be chosen to the seat of honor in the Church, disregarding a poorer but more learned and holier man? But if he speaks of everyday seating arrangements, who sins here (if indeed he sins) except when he judges internally within himself that the other seems better to him to the degree that he is richer?"
OecumeniusAD 990
Commentary on James
My brothers, do not hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with bias to individuals. For if there should come into your assembly a man with gold rings, in fine apparel, and there should also come in a poor man in filthy clothes, and you pay attention to the one wearing the fine clothes and say to him, "You sit here in a good place," and say to the poor man, "You stand there," or "Sit here at my footstool," have you not shown partiality among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?
"with bias to individuals." For he who does something with respect to individuals fills himself with many blemishes and much reproach, afflicting his neighbor with disgrace, and also himself before him: for the treatment of a companion transmits what is done even to oneself.
"have you not shown partiality." The conjunction, “And”, abounds, that is, you have corrupted the power of judging which was in you, making no inquiry as to whether he is to be honored, the poor man who is upright and industrious, or the rich man who is lazy: but without judgment and with respect to persons, you honored the one indeed because of his riches, but you held the other in contempt because of his poverty.
“among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?” That is, unjust judges, affected by jealousy out of respect for persons. In this place, the conjunction καὶ abounds, that is, “and”, as has been said, from the use of the former phrase. For since this discourse is a response to what has gone before, the conjunction is unnecessary. For the sentence should be arranged thus: For if a man wearing a gold ring, dressed in splendid clothing, enters your assembly, while a poor man in filthy clothing also enters, etc., you have not judged among yourselves and have become judges of evil thoughts: that is, corrupting the power of judging, you have chosen evil thoughts, honoring the one indeed, but holding the other in contempt: although yet the nature was the same in both.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying James 2:2 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.