Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ To have respect of persons is not good: for for a piece of bread that man will transgress.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
To have respect H5234 of persons H6440 is not good H2896: for for a piece H6595 of bread H3899 that man H1397 will transgress H6586.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
To show partiality is not good, though a person may do wrong for a crust of bread.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
To show partiality is not good, yet a man will do wrong for a piece of bread.
Ask
American Standard Version
To have respect of persons is not good; Neither that a man should transgress for a piece of bread.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
To show partiality is not good; yet a man will do wrong for a piece of bread.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
To haue respect of persons is not good: for that man will transgresse for a piece of bread.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
To discern faces is not good, And for a piece of bread doth a man transgress.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Proverbs 28:21 delivers a profound and sobering warning against the corrupting influence of partiality and the alarming ease with which moral integrity can be compromised. It asserts that showing favoritism, or "respect of persons," is inherently detrimental, as it opens the door to ethical decay, leading individuals to violate principles of justice and righteousness for even the most trivial gains. This proverb powerfully underscores the non-negotiable importance of impartiality in all human dealings and highlights the grave danger of allowing self-interest, no matter how small, to corrupt one's righteous conduct and judgment.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Proverbs 28 is a rich tapestry of wisdom sayings that frequently contrasts the character and outcomes of the righteous versus the wicked, emphasizing themes of justice, integrity, diligence, and the inevitable consequences of sin. This chapter, in particular, often addresses the conduct of leaders and the broader community, highlighting the societal impact of uprightness versus corruption. Verses immediately preceding Proverbs 28:21 speak to the courage of the righteous and the flight of the wicked (v. 1), the instability of a land due to transgression (v. 2), and the oppression of the poor (v. 3). The condemnation of "respect of persons" in verse 21 aligns seamlessly with the chapter's broader call for righteous governance and equitable treatment, serving as a specific application of the general principles of justice and integrity advocated throughout the book of Proverbs, such as those found in the warnings against dishonest practices in Proverbs 11:1.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, the administration of justice was central to the covenant relationship between God and His people. Judges and elders were divinely mandated to administer justice impartially, reflecting the very character of God, who "shows no partiality and accepts no bribes" (Deuteronomy 10:17). Showing "respect of persons" (Hebrew: nasa panim) was considered a grave offense, as it fundamentally undermined the integrity of the legal system and the social fabric. This practice involved judging or treating individuals based on their social status, wealth, family connections, or personal influence, rather than on the merits of their case or character. Such favoritism was explicitly forbidden in Mosaic Law, as seen in Leviticus 19:15. The "piece of bread" serves as a powerful cultural metaphor for a minimal, almost negligible, gain, highlighting the extreme moral degradation of someone willing to compromise justice for such a paltry reward, emphasizing the low threshold for corruption.
  • Key Themes: This proverb centrally addresses the theme of Impartiality versus Partiality, presenting a strong condemnation of favoritism in any form. God's standard for His people, particularly those in authority, is absolute fairness, where judgment is based on truth and righteousness, not external factors. This principle is foundational to a just society and is echoed throughout the Law and Prophets, as illustrated in the command not to pervert justice or show partiality in Deuteronomy 16:19. Furthermore, it highlights the theme of Corruption and Compromise, vividly illustrating how easily deeply held principles can be abandoned. The willingness to "transgress" for "a piece of bread" underscores the insidious nature of corruption, which often begins with seemingly small concessions or bribes, leading to a complete erosion of integrity. This speaks to the broader biblical emphasis on maintaining Integrity and Righteousness in all dealings, recognizing that true justice cannot exist where partiality reigns, a truth consistently upheld from the foundational laws in Exodus 23:3 to the prophetic calls for justice in Amos 5:24.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Respect (Hebrew, nâkar', H5234): From נָכַר. This root properly means "to scrutinize, i.e., look intently at." However, it also carries the sense of "to acknowledge, be acquainted with, care for, respect, revere," or, conversely, "to disregard, ignore, be strange toward." When combined with "persons" (faces), it forms the idiom for showing partiality or preferential treatment, implying an act of discerning or recognizing someone in a way that leads to biased judgment rather than objective assessment of truth.
  • Persons (Hebrew, pânîym', H6440): From פָּנֶה. This word is the plural (though always treated as singular) of an unused noun meaning "face." It is used in a vast array of applications, both literally and figuratively, often referring to the presence, countenance, or individual. In the idiom "respect of persons" (literally "to lift up the face" or "to recognize the face"), it refers to showing deference or favor to an individual based on their outward appearance, status, or identity, rather than their character or the merits of their case.
  • Transgress (Hebrew, pâshaʻ', H6586): A primitive root. This word signifies "to break away (from just authority), i.e., trespass, apostatize, quarrel." In the context of Proverbs 28:21, it denotes a deliberate act of rebellion against what is right or divinely ordained, a violation of moral or legal boundaries, specifically in the context of perverting justice or acting unrighteously for personal gain.

Verse Breakdown

  • "To have respect of persons is not good:" This initial clause issues a direct and unequivocal condemnation of partiality. The Hebrew idiom nasa panim (literally, "to lift up the face" or "to recognize the face") implies showing favoritism or preferential treatment to an individual, often based on their status, wealth, or outward appearance, rather than judging them impartially based on the facts or their character. The declaration that this practice is "not good" (Hebrew: lo-ṭôwb, H2896) signifies that it is morally wrong, harmful, and fundamentally contrary to divine wisdom and justice. It is an abomination in God's sight and destructive to societal well-being and the integrity of any system.
  • "for for a piece of bread that man will transgress." This second clause provides the dire reason or consequence for the condemnation of partiality. The phrase "for a piece of bread" (Hebrew: path lechem, H6595, H3899) is a potent metaphor, indicating a very small, almost insignificant gain, a paltry bribe, or a minimal personal advantage. It highlights the shocking ease and low threshold at which a person, described as geber (H1397, a valiant man, or simply "a man"), will abandon principles and "transgress" (Hebrew: pâshaʻ, H6586), meaning to rebel, trespass, or violate justice. This illustrates the insidious and corrupting power of even minimal self-interest, demonstrating how easily integrity can be sacrificed for fleeting, trivial benefits, leading to a profound moral failure.

Literary Devices

Proverbs 28:21 employs several potent literary devices to convey its message with striking clarity and impact. The central device is Idiom, specifically the Hebrew phrase nasa panim, translated as "respect of persons." This idiom literally means "to lift up the face," signifying the act of showing favor or preferential treatment to someone, often by acknowledging their status or appearance rather than their true character or the merits of a situation. This idiomatic expression powerfully encapsulates the concept of partiality. Furthermore, the proverb utilizes vivid Symbolism through the phrase "a piece of bread." This seemingly innocuous item serves as a potent symbol for a trivial gain, a paltry bribe, or any minor personal advantage. Its smallness dramatically emphasizes the shocking degree to which human integrity can be compromised for even the most negligible reward. Finally, there is an implicit Contrast between what is "good" (impartiality and righteous judgment) and the act of "transgressing" (corruption for personal gain), highlighting the stark moral choice individuals face when confronted with the temptation to show favoritism.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This proverb deeply resonates with the biblical emphasis on God's character as perfectly just and impartial, and His expectation that His people, especially those in positions of authority, reflect this divine attribute. Partiality is not merely a social ill but a profound theological offense, as it distorts justice, undermines truth, and disregards the inherent dignity of all individuals, whom God created in His image. The willingness to compromise for "a piece of bread" reveals a heart that values fleeting personal gain over enduring righteousness, a fundamental betrayal of covenantal fidelity. This principle extends beyond judicial settings to all aspects of life, calling believers to cultivate a spirit of equity and fairness in their relationships, business dealings, and community interactions, recognizing that true wisdom is demonstrated in righteous living and a steadfast commitment to God's standards of justice.

  • Deuteronomy 1:17: "Ye shall not respect persons in judgment; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of the face of man; for the judgment is God's..."
  • James 2:9: "But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors."
  • Galatians 2:6: "But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person:) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:"

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Proverbs 28:21 serves as a timeless mirror, challenging us to examine our own hearts and actions for any trace of partiality or willingness to compromise integrity for personal benefit. In a world often driven by connections, status, and self-promotion, this proverb calls us back to the foundational principle of treating all people with dignity, fairness, and unwavering justice, regardless of their background, influence, or perceived worth. It warns against the subtle temptations that can erode our moral compass, reminding us that even small concessions to injustice can lead to significant moral failures. True integrity is demonstrated not just in resisting grand temptations, but in refusing to compromise our principles for even "a piece of bread"—a minor advantage, a fleeting comfort, or a slight personal gain. This applies to every sphere of life, from how we interact with colleagues and neighbors to how we make decisions in leadership roles, urging us to embody God's own impartiality and righteousness, fostering a community where justice flows freely.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might I be tempted to show "respect of persons" or partiality, even subtly, perhaps without realizing it?
  • What "pieces of bread"—small gains, conveniences, or social advantages—might tempt me to compromise my integrity or overlook injustice in my personal or professional life?
  • How can I actively cultivate a heart of impartiality and a steadfast commitment to justice in my daily interactions and significant decisions?
  • What steps can I take to advocate for fairness and oppose partiality within my community, workplace, or sphere of influence, reflecting God's character?

FAQ

What does "respect of persons" mean in a biblical context?

Answer: In a biblical context, "respect of persons" (Hebrew: nasa panim) refers to showing favoritism or partiality based on someone's outward appearance, wealth, social status, family connections, or personal influence, rather than judging them impartially based on truth and merit. It is condemned throughout Scripture as a perversion of justice and an act contrary to God's character, who Himself "shows no partiality and accepts no bribes" (Deuteronomy 10:17). This concept is particularly relevant in judicial settings, where judges were forbidden from showing favoritism to either the rich or the poor, but it applies to all areas of life where fairness and equity are required, as emphasized in Romans 2:11).

Why is compromising for "a piece of bread" highlighted as such a significant issue?

Answer: The phrase "a piece of bread" serves as a powerful metaphor for a very small, almost negligible, gain, a paltry bribe, or a minor personal advantage. Its significance lies in highlighting the extreme ease and low threshold at which an individual might abandon their moral principles and "transgress" (violate justice or ethical boundaries). It underscores the insidious nature of corruption, which often begins with seemingly minor concessions. The proverb teaches that true integrity means refusing to compromise for any gain, no matter how small, because even a minor compromise can lead to a complete erosion of one's ethical stance and a perversion of justice. This principle is echoed in the broader biblical warnings against bribery and the corrupting influence of even minor dishonest gains, as seen throughout the laws of justice in Exodus 23).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Proverbs 28:21 finds its ultimate fulfillment and deepest meaning in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While the proverb warns against human partiality, Christ Himself perfectly embodies divine impartiality. He "had no respect of persons" in His earthly ministry, reaching out to the marginalized, the poor, and the outcast, just as readily as to the rich and powerful, demonstrating God's universal love and justice (Luke 19:1-10). Unlike the man who "transgresses for a piece of bread," Jesus consistently resisted every temptation to compromise His divine mission for earthly gain or personal comfort. Famously, in the wilderness, He refused to turn stones into bread, thereby rejecting the very temptation of material provision over divine purpose and obedience to God's word (Matthew 4:1-4). His ultimate sacrifice on the cross was not for personal gain or self-preservation, but for the redemption of humanity, a selfless act that perfectly upholds divine justice while extending boundless grace to all who believe. Through His life, death, and resurrection, Christ establishes a new covenant where all are welcomed into God's family without partiality, breaking down all barriers of status, ethnicity, or gender. Believers are now called to live out this same impartiality, reflecting His character in their dealings with one another, knowing that in Christ, "there is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28).

Copy as

Commentary on Proverbs 28 verse 21

21 ¶ To have respect of persons is not good: for for a piece of bread that man will transgress.

Note, 1. It is a fundamental error in the administration of justice, and that which cannot but lead men to abundance of transgression, to consider the parties concerned more than the merits of the cause, so as to favour one because he is a gentleman, a scholar, my countryman, my old acquaintance, has formerly done me a kindness, or may do me one, or is of my party and persuasion, and to bear hard on the other party because he is a stranger, a poor man, has done me an ill turn, is or has been my rival, or is not of my mind, or has voted against me. Judgment is perverted when any consideration of this kind is admitted into the scale, any thing but pure right. 2. Those that are partial will be paltry. Those that have once broken through the bonds of equity, though, at first, it must be some great bribe, some noble present, that would bias them, yet, when they have debauched their consciences, they will, at length, be so sordid that for a piece of bread they will give judgment against their consciences; they will rather play at small game than sit out.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verse 21. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Proverbs 28:21 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.