Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And these are the sons of Reuel Esau's son; duke Nahath, duke Zerah, duke Shammah, duke Mizzah: these are the dukes that came of Reuel in the land of Edom; these are the sons of Bashemath Esau's wife.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And these are the sons H1121 of Reuel H7467 Esau's H6215 son H1121; duke H441 Nahath H5184, duke H441 Zerah H2226, duke H441 Shammah H8048, duke H441 Mizzah H4199: these are the dukes H441 that came of Reuel H7467 in the land H776 of Edom H123; these are the sons H1121 of Bashemath H1315 Esau's H6215 wife H802.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of Re'u'el 'Esav's son were the chieftains of Nachat, Zerach, Shammah and Mizah. These were the chieftains descended from Re'u'el in the land of Edom and from Basmat 'Esav's wife.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
These are the sons of Esau’s son Reuel: Chiefs Nahath, Zerah, Shammah, and Mizzah. They are the chiefs descended from Reuel in the land of Edom, and they are the grandsons of Esau’s wife Basemath.
Ask
American Standard Version
And these are the sons of Reuel, Esau’s son: chief Nahath, chief Zerah, chief Shammah, chief Mizzah: these are the chiefs that came of Reuel in the land of Edom; these are the sons of Basemath, Esau’s wife.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
These are the sons of Reuel, Esau’s son: chief Nahath, chief Zerah, chief Shammah, chief Mizzah: these are the chiefs who came of Reuel in the land of Edom; these are the sons of Basemath, Esau’s wife.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And these are the sonnes of Reuel Esaus sonne: Duke Nahath, Duke Zerah, Duke Shammah, Duke Mizzah: these are the Dukes that came of Reuel in the land of Edom: these are the sonnes of Bashemath Esaus wife.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And these are sons of Reuel son of Esau: chief Nahath, chief Zerah, chief Shammah, chief Mizzah; these are chiefs of Reuel, in the land of Edom; these are sons of Bashemath wife of Esau.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
Esau and Edom
Esau and Edom View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 1,058 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Genesis 36:17 provides a specific enumeration of four tribal leaders—Nahath, Zerah, Shammah, and Mizzah—who were the sons of Reuel, himself a son of Esau through his wife Bashemath. This verse meticulously details a segment of Esau's lineage, establishing the early structure of governance and identifying key figures within the nascent nation of Edom in its designated territory.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Genesis 36 serves as a comprehensive genealogical interlude, meticulously detailing the descendants of Esau, also known as Edom. This chapter stands in deliberate parallel to the preceding narratives that trace the lineage of Jacob (Israel), providing a complete account of the two nations that sprang from Rebekah's womb, as prophesied in Genesis 25:23. Verse 17 specifically focuses on the sons of Reuel, one of Esau's sons, elaborating on the "dukes" or chieftains who emerged from this branch of Esau's family. This detailed listing reinforces the distinct national identity and organizational structure of the Edomites, setting the stage for their future interactions with Israel throughout biblical history.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Edomites, descendants of Esau, settled in the mountainous region of Seir, southeast of the Dead Sea, which subsequently became known as the "land of Edom." In the ancient Near East, tribal societies often evolved from clan-based structures into more formalized leadership roles, initially led by chieftains or "dukes" before the establishment of centralized monarchies. Genesis 36 reflects this early stage of national formation, where authority was vested in heads of clans or families. The mention of "dukes" (alluphim) signifies these prominent tribal leaders, indicating a form of governance distinct from the later kingships that would emerge, as noted in Genesis 36:31. This cultural detail provides insight into the sociopolitical landscape of the region during the patriarchal period.
  • Key Themes: Genesis 36, including verse 17, contributes to several significant themes within the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it underscores Divine Sovereignty in National Formation, demonstrating God's meticulous hand in shaping distinct peoples, even those not directly in the covenant line leading to the Messiah. Secondly, it highlights the Fulfillment of Prophecy, as God had declared that Esau would also become a great nation (Genesis 36:1). Thirdly, the chapter establishes the Distinct Identity and Destiny of Edom, separate from Israel, providing crucial historical and geographical context for the often-strained relationship between the two nations in later biblical accounts, such as their refusal to allow Israel passage in Numbers 20:14-21. Finally, the detailed genealogies and mention of "dukes" illustrate the Early Forms of Governance prevalent in the ancient world, showcasing the transition from patriarchal clan leadership to more organized tribal chieftainships.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • sons (Hebrew, bên', H1121): Meaning "a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etc.)." In Genesis 36:17, bên specifically denotes the direct male offspring of Reuel, emphasizing their role in extending the family line and contributing to the formation of the Edomite nation. The term highlights the patriarchal structure where lineage and male descendants were crucial for establishing tribal identity and continuity.
  • duke (Hebrew, ʼallûwph', H441): Meaning "familiar; a friend, also gentle; hence, a bullock (as being tame); and so, a chieftain (as notable, like neat cattle); captain, duke, (chief) friend, governor, guide, ox." This term is pivotal in Genesis 36, signifying a tribal chief or clan leader. Its use here indicates that Nahath, Zerah, Shammah, and Mizzah were not merely sons but held positions of authority, leading significant family units or clans within the emerging Edomite society. This form of leadership predates the establishment of a centralized monarchy.
  • Edom (Hebrew, ʼĔdôm', H123): Meaning "red (see Genesis 25:25); Edom, the elder twin-brother of Jacob; hence the region (Idumaea) occupied by him." This word connects the geographical territory directly to Esau, whose name "Edom" (red) was given due to his reddish appearance at birth and his sale of his birthright for red stew. The phrase "in the land of Edom" firmly situates these dukes and their clans within the established territory of Esau's descendants, confirming their presence and organization in the region of Seir.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And these [are] the sons of Reuel Esau's son;": This opening clause immediately establishes the familial relationship of the individuals to be listed. It clarifies that Reuel is a son of Esau, and the subsequent names are Reuel's direct offspring. This genealogical precision is characteristic of biblical narratives, serving to trace and validate lineages.
  • "duke Nahath, duke Zerah, duke Shammah, duke Mizzah:": This segment enumerates the four specific individuals who are identified as sons of Reuel. Crucially, each name is preceded by the title "duke," indicating their status as tribal chiefs or clan leaders. This highlights their significant roles in the early organizational structure of the Edomite people, demonstrating a form of decentralized authority.
  • "these [are] the dukes [that came] of Reuel in the land of Edom;": This phrase reiterates and reinforces the previous statement, emphasizing that these four "dukes" specifically originated from Reuel's lineage. The explicit mention "in the land of Edom" firmly anchors their leadership and tribal activity within the geographical territory settled by Esau's descendants, confirming their established presence and influence in that region.
  • "these [are] the sons of Bashemath Esau's wife.": This concluding clause provides additional clarity regarding the maternal lineage. It specifies that Reuel, and by extension his sons, came through Bashemath, one of Esau's wives. This detail further solidifies the genealogical record, ensuring accuracy and completing the familial connection within Esau's extensive family tree.

Literary Devices

Genesis 36:17 employs several literary devices to achieve its purpose. The most prominent is Genealogy, as the entire chapter is dedicated to cataloging the descendants of Esau. This specific verse contributes to that broader genealogical record by meticulously tracing a particular branch of Esau's family through Reuel. Closely related is Enumeration, where the text provides a precise list of names (Nahath, Zerah, Shammah, Mizzah) and their associated titles ("duke"). This direct listing serves to create a clear and verifiable record of the Edomite leadership. Furthermore, the device of Repetition is evident in the repeated use of "duke" before each name and the reiteration of "these [are] the sons of Reuel" and "these [are] the dukes [that came] of Reuel." This repetition emphasizes the status and origin of these individuals, reinforcing their identity as leaders within the Edomite nation and solidifying the genealogical connection.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Genesis 36:17, within the broader context of Esau's genealogy, underscores the meticulousness of God's sovereign plan, even for nations outside the direct covenant line of Israel. The detailed record of Edom's formation, complete with its early tribal leaders, demonstrates God's faithfulness to His promise that Esau too would become a great nation, distinct from Jacob. This parallel development highlights that while God chose a specific lineage for His redemptive purposes, His overarching providence extends to all peoples, shaping their histories and territories. The existence and organization of Edom, as detailed here, provides essential background for understanding the complex and often adversarial relationship between Israel and Edom throughout the Old Testament, revealing how divine purpose unfolds through the interactions of diverse nations.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a list of names and titles might initially seem like a mere historical record, Genesis 36:17, embedded within the detailed genealogy of Esau, invites profound reflection on the expansive nature of God's providence and the intricate tapestry of redemptive history. It reminds us that God's plan is not confined to a single lineage but encompasses the rise and fall of all nations, each playing a role in His grand design. This verse, by meticulously identifying the early leaders of Edom, provides crucial context for understanding the future interactions between Israel and its neighbors, demonstrating how seemingly minor details in Scripture contribute to the unfolding narrative of God's sovereign will. It teaches us to look beyond the immediate text to discern the broader theological implications—that God is at work in all of history, orchestrating events and raising up leaders, even in nations not directly part of the covenant promise, all for His ultimate purposes. This should encourage us to trust in His overarching plan, even when its details seem obscure, recognizing that every part of His story serves a divine purpose.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detailing of Esau's lineage, including the "dukes" in Genesis 36:17, challenge or confirm your understanding of God's sovereignty over all nations, not just Israel?
  • What can we learn about the nature of leadership and societal organization in ancient times from the mention of "dukes" rather than kings in early Edom?
  • In what ways does understanding the distinct origins and early leadership of Edom, as presented in this verse, help us better comprehend the later conflicts and relationships between Israel and Edom throughout the Old Testament?

FAQ

Why does the Bible dedicate an entire chapter to Esau's genealogy, including specific verses like Genesis 36:17?

Answer: The dedication of Genesis 36 to Esau's genealogy serves multiple critical purposes. Firstly, it fulfills God's promise that Esau, like Jacob, would become a great nation (Genesis 35:11-12). This detailed account establishes the distinct identity and national formation of Edom, parallel to Israel. Secondly, it provides crucial historical and geographical context for the future interactions, often marked by conflict, between Israel and Edom throughout biblical history. By meticulously outlining their origins and early leadership structure, the text underscores the separate destinies of the two nations born from Rebekah's womb, highlighting God's sovereign plan unfolding through all peoples, not solely the direct covenant line.

What is the significance of the term "duke" in Genesis 36:17 and throughout the chapter?

Answer: The term "duke" (Hebrew alluph, H441) in Genesis 36:17 and elsewhere in the chapter is highly significant. It refers to a tribal chief or clan leader, indicating a form of governance based on family heads rather than a centralized monarchy. This distinguishes the early Edomite society from later kingdoms, including their own future kingship, as explicitly stated in Genesis 36:31. The repeated use of "duke" throughout Esau's lineage highlights the decentralized, clan-based structure of the Edomites during this period, where authority was distributed among prominent family leaders, providing valuable insight into the sociopolitical organization of ancient Near Eastern peoples.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Genesis 36:17 focuses on the lineage of Esau, a figure outside the direct covenant line that leads to Christ, it nonetheless contributes to the broader narrative of God's sovereign plan for all humanity, which ultimately culminates in the Messiah. By meticulously detailing the formation of the Edomite nation, the passage implicitly emphasizes the distinct, chosen line through which the "Seed of the woman" would come (Genesis 3:15). It highlights God's faithfulness to His covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, through whom all the nations of the earth would be blessed (Genesis 12:3). The very existence of these separate nations, each with their own leaders and destinies, underscores the particularity of God's redemptive work through Israel, culminating in Jesus Christ. He is the ultimate "Duke" or leader, the King of kings, who would ultimately gather people from every tribe, tongue, people, and nation (Revelation 7:9-10) into His eternal kingdom, fulfilling God's universal redemptive purpose that extends far beyond any single lineage.

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 36 verses 9–19

Observe here, 1. That only the names of Esau's sons and grandsons are recorded, only their names, not their history; for it is the church that Moses preserves the records of, not the record of those that are without. Those elders that lived by faith alone obtained a good report. It is Sion that produces men of renown, not Seir, Psa 87:5. Nor does the genealogy go any further than the third and fourth generation; the very names of all after are buried in oblivion. It is only the pedigree of the Israelites, who were to be the heirs of Canaan, and of whom were to come the promised seed, and the holy seed, that is drawn out to any length, as far as there was occasion for it, even of all the tribes till Canaan was divided among them, and of the royal line till Christ came. 2. That these sons and grandsons of Esau are called dukes, Gen 36:15-19. Probably they were military commanders, dukes, or captains, that had soldiers under them; for Esau and his family lived by the sword, Gen 27:40. Note, Titles of honour have been more ancient out of the church than in it. Esau's sons were dukes when Jacob's sons were but plain shepherds, Gen 47:3. This is not a reason why such titles should not be used among Christians; but it is a reason why men should not overvalue themselves, or others, for the sake of them. There is an honour that comes from God, and a name in his house that is infinitely more valuable. Edomites may be dukes with men, but Israelites indeed are made to our God kings and priests. 3. We may suppose those dukes had numerous families of children and servants that were their dukedoms. God promised to multiply Jacob, and to enrich him; yet Esau increases, and is enriched first. Note, It is no new thing for the men of this world to be full of children, and to have their bellies too filled with hidden treasures, Psa 17:14. God's promise to Jacob began to work late, but the effect of it remained longer, and it had its complete accomplishment in the spiritual Israel.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 9–19. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 36:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.