Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
When he was removed out of the highway, all the people went on after Joab, to pursue after Sheba the son of Bichri.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
When he was removed H3014 out of the highway H4546, all the people H376 went on H5674 after H310 Joab H3097, to pursue H7291 after H310 Sheba H7652 the son H1121 of Bichri H1075.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Once he had been removed from the road, all the troops went on after Yo'av, to pursue Sheva the son of Bikhri.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
As soon as Amasa’s body was removed from the road, all the men went on with Joab to pursue Sheba son of Bichri.
Ask
American Standard Version
When he was removed out of the highway, all the people went on after Joab, to pursue after Sheba the son of Bichri.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
When he was removed out of the highway, all the people went on after Joab, to pursue after Sheba the son of Bichri.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
When hee was remoued out of the way, euerie man went after Ioab, to follow after Sheba the sonne of Bichri.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
When he hath been removed out of the highway, every man hath passed on after Joab, to pursue after Sheba son of Bichri.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David View full PDF
David Returns to Jerusalem
David Returns to Jerusalem View full PDF
Sheba’s Revolt
Sheba’s Revolt View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 8,568 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Second Samuel 20:13 marks a pivotal moment in the pursuit of Sheba's rebellion, immediately following Joab's treacherous assassination of Amasa, David's newly appointed army commander. The verse details the swift and pragmatic removal of Amasa's body from the main thoroughfare, which had halted the advancing Israelite troops. With this gruesome obstruction cleared, the army promptly resumed its march under Joab's de facto leadership, continuing their urgent mission to apprehend Sheba, the son of Bichri, thereby highlighting the ruthless efficiency and relentless drive characteristic of military operations in ancient Israel.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within the tumultuous aftermath of Absalom's rebellion and King David's complex return to Jerusalem. The kingdom, still reeling from internal strife, faces a new and immediate threat from Sheba, a Benjaminite who incites a fresh revolt, drawing away the men of Israel from their loyalty to David (2 Samuel 20:1). In an effort to reassert control and possibly to diminish Joab's entrenched power, David had controversially appointed Amasa, his nephew and former commander of Absalom's forces, as the new commander of Israel's army (2 Samuel 19:13). Joab, a seasoned and ruthless military leader fiercely protective of his position, intercepts Amasa near the great stone in Gibeon. Under the guise of a fraternal greeting, Joab murders Amasa with a single, deceptive thrust, a chilling echo of his earlier assassination of Abner (2 Samuel 3:27). Amasa's body, lying conspicuously in the middle of the road, became a literal and psychological impediment, causing the pursuing army to halt, thereby jeopardizing the vital mission against Sheba. Verse 13 describes the necessary, albeit grim, action taken to remove this obstruction and allow the pursuit to continue unimpeded.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period of David's reign, particularly following the Absalom rebellion, was characterized by significant political instability, intense power struggles, and shifting loyalties within his own family and among his military elite. Loyalty to the king was paramount, yet often tested by personal ambition, tribal allegiances, and the brutal realities of ancient Near Eastern power politics. Military campaigns demanded swift and decisive action, and any obstruction, whether physical or psychological, could compromise the entire mission. The public display of a body, especially that of a prominent figure like Amasa, would have been profoundly disturbing, capable of demoralizing troops, inciting fear, or even provoking further unrest. Joab's actions, while morally reprehensible, reflect the harsh pragmatism of ancient warfare and the lengths to which commanders would go to secure their authority and achieve military objectives. The "highway" or "main road" mentioned was a primary artery for travel and military movement, making Amasa's body an unavoidable and highly visible impediment to the army's critical advance.
  • Key Themes: This passage powerfully illustrates several recurring themes within the Deuteronomistic History. Ruthless Ambition is starkly portrayed in Joab's actions; he eliminates a rival to reclaim his undisputed command, demonstrating an unwavering determination to maintain power at any cost. This highlights the corrupting influence of power and the morally compromising lengths to which individuals will go to secure it. The theme of Pragmatism Over Morality is also profoundly evident; despite witnessing a horrific act of treachery, the army's immediate concern shifts to the practical necessity of continuing the pursuit. Once the physical and psychological obstruction of Amasa's body is removed, the troops, driven by military objective, immediately resume their mission, underscoring how expediency can overshadow ethical considerations in times of conflict. Furthermore, the verse literally exemplifies The Impact and Removal of Obstacles, showing how a single, disturbing impediment can halt collective progress. Only by directly addressing and removing the hindrance ("When he was removed out of the highway") could the mission proceed, serving as a powerful metaphor for the necessity of overcoming literal or metaphorical obstacles in any endeavor. Finally, Joab's violent actions, though morally reprehensible, effectively demonstrate the Consolidation of Power, as he swiftly reasserts his control over the army, enabling him to lead the charge against the rebellion and restore order, albeit through brutal means.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • removed (Hebrew, yâgâh', H3014): The verb יָגָה (yâgâh) from H3014, meaning "to push away; be removed." In this context, it signifies a deliberate and decisive act of clearing an obstruction. It implies that Amasa's body was not merely moved accidentally but was intentionally taken out of the way to facilitate the army's movement. This action underscores the urgency of the situation and the practical mindset of the military, prioritizing the mission's progress over the solemnity typically afforded to the deceased.
  • highway (Hebrew, mᵉçillâh', H4546): The noun מְסִלָּה (mᵉçillâh) from H4546, refers to a "thoroughfare (as turnpiked), literally or figuratively; specifically a viaduct, a staircase." This term emphasizes that Amasa's body was lying in a prominent, central, and essential pathway for travel. Its presence on the "highway" meant it was a direct and unavoidable impediment to the entire army, making its removal absolutely necessary for the continuation of the pursuit. The public nature of the highway also highlights the scandalous and disruptive impact of Joab's deed.
  • went on (Hebrew, ʻâbar', H5674): The verb עָבַר (ʻâbar) from H5674, means "to cross over; used very widely of any transition (literal or figurative; transitive, intransitive, intensive, causative)." This word directly conveys the resumption of movement and progress. Once the obstacle was cleared, the army's forward momentum, which had been momentarily halted, was immediately restored. It emphasizes the swift transition from stagnation to action, demonstrating the army's singular focus on its military objective under Joab's re-established command.

Verse Breakdown

  • "When he was removed out of the highway,": This clause describes the immediate and practical solution to the problem presented by Amasa's body. The preceding verses (2 Samuel 20:11-12) explain that a young man was tasked with drawing the people's attention away from the gruesome sight and urging them to follow Joab. However, the physical presence of the body continued to cause a bottleneck. This phrase signifies the precise moment when the body was physically taken off the main road, likely into a field, allowing the flow of troops to resume without the disturbing visual and physical impediment.
  • "all the people went on after Joab,": This phrase indicates the swift and decisive re-establishment of Joab's de facto leadership. Despite his treacherous act, or perhaps because of his ruthless efficiency and the army's immediate need for a commander, the troops immediately resumed following him. This demonstrates the soldiers' primary allegiance to the one who could lead them effectively in battle, even if his methods were morally reprehensible. It also speaks to the urgent necessity for unified command in a time of rebellion.
  • "to pursue after Sheba the son of Bichri.": This final clause clarifies the overarching objective that was momentarily interrupted. The pursuit of Sheba, who had instigated a new rebellion against David, was the urgent military priority. The removal of Amasa's body and the resumption of the march were all directed towards this singular goal, underscoring the relentless nature of the military campaign and the determination to quash the uprising against King David.

Literary Devices

The narrative in 2 Samuel 20:13 employs several potent literary devices to convey its stark message. There is a strong sense of Irony at play: Joab's murderous act, which should have alienated the troops and sparked outrage, instead serves to consolidate his power and allows the army to resume its mission under his command. His ruthless efficiency, rather than his moral standing, dictates the immediate outcome and the army's pragmatic response. Symbolism is also evident, with Amasa's body serving as a powerful symbol of an obstacle – both a literal physical impediment to the army's movement and a moral impediment, representing the internal corruption and treachery within David's own ranks. Its swift removal signifies the army's pragmatic decision to overlook the moral implications for the sake of immediate military objectives. Furthermore, the narrative demonstrates effective Pacing, as the sudden halt caused by the body is quickly resolved, leading to an immediate resumption of the narrative's forward momentum, mirroring the army's renewed pursuit. This rapid shift emphasizes the urgency of the situation and the army's single-minded focus on its mission.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

2 Samuel 20:13, while describing a seemingly mundane logistical action, is deeply embedded in the larger theological narrative of leadership, sin, and divine sovereignty within the Davidic kingdom. It starkly illustrates the consequences of unchecked ambition and the moral compromises that arise in the pursuit of power. Joab's repeated acts of treachery (compare his murder of Abner in 2 Samuel 3:27) highlight the pervasive nature of sin, even among those ostensibly serving God's anointed king. Yet, even amidst such human depravity and political chaos, God's overarching purpose for David's kingdom continues to unfold. The removal of the obstacle, while driven by human expediency, allows the narrative to progress towards the quelling of the rebellion, which ultimately serves to stabilize David's throne, a throne established by divine promise (2 Samuel 7:12). The passage implicitly raises profound questions about the nature of leadership, loyalty, and the difficult choices made in times of crisis, reminding us that God often works through imperfect instruments and amidst deeply flawed human actions to achieve His sovereign will.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

This passage offers profound insights into human nature, the complexities of leadership, and the challenges of pursuing a mission in the face of obstacles, both literal and metaphorical. It serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of unchecked ambition and the morally compromising decisions that can arise in power struggles. Joab's actions compel us to examine our own motivations: are we willing to sacrifice ethical standards for the sake of efficiency, personal gain, or the perceived greater good? The army's immediate resumption of the pursuit after the obstacle was removed highlights the pragmatic focus on objectives, but it also challenges us to consider whether our singular pursuit of goals ever blinds us to the moral cost or the human impact. In our own lives, we often encounter "Amasas" – unexpected obstacles, emotional baggage, unresolved conflicts, or even our own sinful tendencies – that halt our progress. The verse implicitly asks us: What "bodies" do we need to "remove from the highway" of our lives to move forward in our spiritual journey, our relationships, or our callings? This story prompts a deep reflection on the choices we make when faced with difficult circumstances and the critical balance between achieving desired outcomes and upholding ethical and godly standards.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "obstacles" (physical, emotional, spiritual) are currently hindering your progress in life or faith, and what steps are you taking to address them?
  • How do you balance the need for practical, efficient action with ethical and moral considerations in your personal and professional decision-making?
  • In what ways might unchecked ambition manifest in your own life or in the organizations and communities you are a part of?
  • What does this passage teach us about the nature of leadership, both its potential for good and its susceptibility to corruption?

FAQ

Why was Amasa's body such a hindrance to the army's progress?

Answer: Amasa's body was a significant hindrance for both practical and psychological reasons. Practically, it lay "in the highway" (2 Samuel 20:12), meaning it was directly in the path of the advancing army, forcing them to stop, divert, or slow down. Psychologically, the sight of the murdered commander, especially one who had only recently been appointed by King David (2 Samuel 19:13), was shocking and deeply disturbing. The text notes that "every one that came by him stood still" (2 Samuel 20:12), indicating that the gruesome scene was causing a literal bottleneck and a demoralizing effect on the troops. It served as a stark, public reminder of Joab's brutality and the instability within David's kingdom, diverting the soldiers' attention from their primary mission of pursuing Sheba. Its removal was therefore essential to restore focus, morale, and momentum to the military campaign.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 2 Samuel 20:13 describes a moment of human treachery and pragmatic violence, it subtly points to the ultimate, perfect leadership and obstacle-removing work of Jesus Christ. Joab, through ruthless ambition, clears a physical impediment to pursue a human enemy, reasserting his flawed and violent authority. In stark contrast, Christ, the true King and perfect Commander, came not to assert power through violence, but through self-sacrifice, clearing the ultimate spiritual obstacle: sin and death. Whereas Amasa's body was a literal stumbling block, Christ's body, broken on the cross, became the very means by which the greatest impediment between humanity and God was removed, blotting out the record of our debt (Colossians 2:14). His glorious resurrection ensures that the "way" to God is now clear and open for all who believe, for He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life (John 14:6). Joab's pursuit of Sheba was a temporary quelling of a human rebellion, but Christ's pursuit is the eternal establishment of His kingdom, overcoming all spiritual rebellion and bringing true peace and reconciliation through His blood (Ephesians 2:16). The swiftness with which the army resumed its march after the obstacle was removed foreshadows the unstoppable advance of God's kingdom under Christ's leadership, where no obstacle, not even the gates of hell, can ultimately hinder His redemptive plan and the building of His church (Matthew 16:18).

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Samuel 20 verses 4–13

We have here Amasa's fall just as he began to rise. He was nephew to David (Sa2 17:25), had been Absalom's general and commander-in-chief of his rebellious army, but, that being routed, he came over into David's interest, upon a promise that he should be general of his forces instead of Joab. Sheba's rebellion gives David an occasion to fulfil his promise sooner than he could wish, but Joab's envy and emulation rendered its fulfillment of ill consequence both to him and David.

I. Amasa has a commission to raise forces for the suppressing of Sheba's rebellion, and is ordered to raise them with all possible expedition, Sa2 20:4. It seems, the men of Judah, though forward to attend the king's triumphs, were backward enough to fight his battles; else, when they were all in a body attending him to Jerusalem, they might immediately have pursued Sheba, and have crushed that cockatrice in the egg. But most love a loyalty, as well as a religion, that is cheap and easy. Many boast of their being akin to Christ that yet are very loth to venture for him. Amasa is sent to assemble the men of Judah within three days; but he finds them so backward and unready that he cannot do it within the time appointed (Sa2 20:5), though the promotion of Amasa, who had been their general under Absalom, was very obliging to them, and a proof of the clemency of David's government.

II. Upon Amasa's delay, Abishai, the brother of Joab, is ordered to take the guards and standing forces, and with them to pursue Sheba (Sa2 20:6, Sa2 20:7), for nothing could be of more dangerous consequence than to give him time. David gives these orders to Abishai, because he resolves to mortify Joab, and degrade him, not so much, I doubt, for the blood of Abner, which he had shed basely, as for the blood of Absalom, which he had shed justly and honourably. "Now (says bishop Hall) Joab smarteth for a loyal disobedience. How slippery are the stations of earthly honours and subject to continual mutability! Happy are those who are in favour with him in whom there is no shadow of change." Joab, without orders, though in disgrace, goes along with his brother, knowing he might be serviceable to the public, or perhaps now meditating the removal of his rival.

III. Joab, near Gibeon, meets with Amasa, and barbarously murders him, Sa2 20:8-10. It should seem, the great stone in Gibeon was the place appointed for the general rendezvous. There the rivals met; and Amasa, relying upon his commission, went before, as general both of the new-raised forces which he had got together, and of the veteran troops which Abishai had brought in; but Joab there took an opportunity to kill him with his own hand; and, 1. He did it subtilely, and with contrivance, and not upon a sudden provocation. He girded his coat about him, that it might not hang in his way, and girded his belt upon his coat, that his sword might be the readier to his hand; he also put his sword in a sheath too big for it, that, whenever he pleased, it might, upon a little shake, fall out, as if it fell by accident, and so he might take it into his hand, unsuspected, as if he were going to return it into the scabbard, when he designed to sheath it in the bowels of Amasa. The more there is of plot in a sin the worse it is. 2. He did it treacherously, and under pretence of friendship, that Amasa might not be upon his guard. He called him brother, for they were own cousins, enquired of his welfare (Art thou in health?) and took him by the beard, as one he was free with, to kiss him, while with the drawn sword in his other hand he was aiming at his heart. Was this done like a gentleman, like a soldier, like a general? No, but like a villain, like a base coward. Just thus he slew Abner, and went unpunished for it, which encouraged him to do the like again. 3. He did it impudently, not in a corner, but at the head of his troops, and in their sight, as one that was neither ashamed nor afraid to do it, that was so hardened in blood and murders that he could neither blush nor tremble. 4. He did it at one blow, gave the fatal push with a good-will, as we say, so that he needed not strike him again; with such a strong and steady hand he gave this one stroke that it was fatal. 5. He did it in contempt and defiance of David and the commission he had given to Amasa; for that commission was the only ground of his quarrel with him, so that David was struck at through the side of Amasa, and was, in effect, told to his face that Joab would be general, in spite of him. 6. He did it very unseasonably, when they were going against a common enemy and were concerned to be unanimous. This ill-timed quarrel might have scattered their forces, or engaged them one against another, and so have made them all an easy prey to Sheba. So contentedly could Joab sacrifice the interest both of king and kingdom to his personal revenge.

IV. Joab immediately resumes his general's place, and takes care to lead the army on in pursuit of Sheba, that, if possible, he might prevent any prejudice to the common cause by what he had done. 1. He leaves one of his men to make proclamation to the forces that were coming up that they were still engaged in David's cause, but under Joab's command, Sa2 20:11. He knew what an interest he had in the soldiery, and how many favoured him rather than Amasa, who had been a traitor, was now a turn-coat, and had never been successful; on this he boldly relied, and called them all to follow him. What man of Judah would not be for his old king and his old general? But one would wonder with what face a murderer could pursue a traitor; and how, under such a heavy load of guilt, he had courage to enter upon danger. Surely his conscience was seared with a hot iron. 2. care is taken to remove the dead body out of the way, because at that they made a stand (as Sa2 2:23), and to cover it with a cloth, Sa2 20:12, Sa2 20:13. Wicked men think themselves safe in their wickedness if they can but conceal it from the eye of the world: if it be hidden, it is with them as if it were never done. But the covering of blood with a cloth cannot stop its cry in God's ear for vengeance, or make it the less loud. However, since this was no time to arraign Joab for what he had done, and the common safety called for expedition, it was prudent to remove that which retarded the march of the army; and then they all went on after Joab, while David, who no doubt had notice soon brought him of this tragedy, could not but reflect upon it with regret that he had not formerly done justice upon Joab for the death of Abner, and that he now had exposed Amasa by preferring him. And perhaps his conscience reminded him of his employing Joab in the murder of Uriah, which had helped to harden him in cruelty.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 4–13. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Samuel 20:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.