TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Samuel 13 verses 21–29
What Solomon says of the beginning of strife is as true of the beginning of all sin, it is as the letting forth of water; when once the flood-gates are plucked up, an inundation follows; one mischief begets another, and it is hard to say what shall be in the end thereof.
I. We are here told how David resented the tidings of Amnon's sin: He was very wroth, Sa2 13:21. So he had reason to be, that his own son should do such a wicked thing and draw him to be accessory to it. It would be a reproach to him for not giving him a better education; it would be a blot upon his family, the ruin of his daughter, a bad example to his kingdom, and a wrong to his son's soul. But was it enough for him to be angry? He ought to have punished his son for it, and have put him to open shame; both as a father and as a king he had power to do it. But the Septuagint here adds these words: But he saddened not the spirit of his son Amnon, because he loved him, because he was his first-born. He fell into Eli's error, whose sons made themselves vile, and he frowned not on them. If Amnon was dear to him, his punishing him would have been so much the greater punishment to himself for his own uncleanness. But he cannot bear the shame those must submit to who correct that in others which they are conscious of in themselves, and therefore his anger must serve instead of his justice; and this hardens sinners, Ecc 8:11.
II. How Absalom resented it. He resolves already to do the part of a judge in Israel; and, since his father will not punish Amnon, he will, from a principle, not of justice or zeal for virtue, but of revenge, because he reckons himself affronted in the abuse done to his sister. Their mother was daughter to a heathen prince (Sa2 3:3), which perhaps they were upbraided with sometimes by their brethren, as children of a stranger. As such a one Absalom thought his sister was now treated; and, if Amnon thought her fit to be made his harlot, he would think him fit to be made his slave. This enraged him, and nothing less than the blood of Amnon will quench his rage. Here we have,
1.The design conceived: Absalom hated Amnon (Sa2 13:22), and he that hateth his brother is a murderer already, and, like Cain, is of that wicked one, Jo1 3:12, Jo1 3:15. Absalom's hatred of his brother's crime would have been commendable, and he might justly have prosecuted him for it by a due course of law, for example to others, and the making of some compensation to his injured sister; but to hate his person, and design his death by assassination, was to put a great affront upon God, by offering to repair the breach of his seventh commandment by the violation of his sixth, as if they were not all alike sacred. But he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill, Jam 2:11.
2.The design concealed. He said nothing to Amnon of this matter, either good or bad, appeared as if he did not know it, and maintained towards him his usual civility, only waiting for a fair opportunity to do him a mischief. That malice is the worst, (1.) Which is hidden closely, and has no vent given to it. If Absalom had reasoned the matter with Amnon, he might have convinced him of his sin and brought him to repentance; but, saying nothing, Amnon's heart was hardened, and his own more and more embittered against him; therefore rebuking our neighbour is opposed to hating him in our hearts, Lev 19:17. Let passion have vent and it will spend itself. (2.) Which is gilded over with a show of friendship; so Absalom's was, his words smoother than butter but war in his heart. See Pro 26:26. (3.) Which is harboured long. Two full years Absalom nursed this root of bitterness, Sa2 13:24. It may be, at first, he did not intend to kill his brother (for, if he had, he might have had as fair an opportunity to do it as he had at last), and only waited for an occasion to disgrace him or do him some other mischief; but in time his hatred ripened to this, that he would be no less than the death of him. If the sun going down once upon the wrath gives such place to the devil (as is intimated, Eph 4:26, Eph 4:27), what would the sunsets of two full years do?
3.The design laid. (1.) Absalom has a feast at his house in the country, as Nabal had, on occasion of his sheep-shearing, Sa2 13:23. Attentive as Absalom was to his person (Sa2 14:26), and as high as he looked, he knew the state of his flocks and looked well to his herds. Those who have no other care about their estates in the country than how to spend them in the town take a ready way to see the end of them. When Absalom had sheep-shearers he would himself be with them. (2.) To this feast he invites the king his father, and all the princes of the blood (Sa2 13:24), not only that he might have this opportunity to pay his respects to them, but that he might make himself the more respected among his neighbours. Those that are akin to great folks are apt to value themselves too much on their kindred. (3.) The king would not go himself, because he would not put him to the expense of his entertainment, Sa2 13:25. It seems Absalom had an estate in his own hands, on which he lived like himself; the king had given it to him, but would have him to be a good husband of it: in both these he is an example to parents, when their children have grown up, to give them a competency to live upon, according to their rank, and then to take care that they do not live above it, especially that they be no way accessory to their doing so. It is prudent for young house-keepers to begin as they can hold out, and not to spend the wool upon the shearing of it. (4.) Absalom got leave for Amnon, and all the rest of the king's sons, to come and grace his table in the country, Sa2 13:26, Sa2 13:27. Absalom had so effectually concealed his enmity to Amnon that David saw no reason to suspect any design upon him in that particular invitation: "Let my brother Amnon go;" but this would make the stroke more cutting to David that he was himself drawn in to consent to that which gave the opportunity for it, as before, Sa2 13:7. It seems, David's sons, though grown up, continued to pay such a deference to their father as not to go such a small journey as this without leave. Thus ought children, even when they have become men and women, to honour their parents, consult them, and do nothing material without their consent, much less against their mind.
4.The design executed, Sa2 13:28, Sa2 13:29. (1.) Absalom's entertainment was very plentiful; for he resolves that they shall all be merry with wine, at least concludes that Amnon will be so, for he knew that he was apt to drink to excess. But, (2.) The orders he gave to his servants concerning Amnon, that they should mingle his blood with his wine, were very barbarous. Had he challenged him, and, in reliance upon the goodness of his cause and the justice of God, fought him himself, though that would have been bad enough, yet it would have been more honourable and excusable (our ancient law, in some cases, allowed trial by battle); but to murder him, as he did, was to copy Cain's example, only that the reason made a difference: Abel was slain for his righteousness, Amnon for his wickedness. Observe the aggravations of this sin: - [1.] He would have Amnon slain when his heart was merry with wine, and he was consequently least apprehensive of danger, least able to resist it, and also least fit to go out of the world; as if his malice aimed to destroy both soul and body, not giving him time to say, Lord, have mercy upon me. What a dreadful surprise hath death been to many, whose hearts have been overcharged with surfeiting and drunkenness! [2.] His servants must be employed to do it, and so involved in the guilt. He was to give the word of command - Smite Amnon; and then they, in obedience to him, and, upon presumption that his authority would bear them out, must kill him. What an impious defiance does he bid to the divine law, when, though the command of God is express, Thou shalt not kill, he bids them kill Amnon, with this warrant, "Have not I commanded you? That is enough. Be courageous, and fear neither God nor man." Those servants are ill taught who obey their masters in contradiction to God, and those are wicked masters who have taught them to do so. Those are too obsequious that will damn their souls to please their masters, whose big words cannot secure them from God's wrath. Masters must always command their servants as those that know they also have a Master in heaven. [3.] He did it in the presence of all the king's sons, of whom it is said (Sa2 8:18) that they were chief rulers; so that it was an affront to public justice which they had the administration of, and to the king his father whom they represented, and a contempt of that sword which should have been a terror to his evil deeds, while his evil deeds, on the contrary, were a terror to those that bore it. [4.] There is reason to suspect that Absalom did this, not only to revenge his sister's quarrel, but to make way for himself to the throne, which he was ambitious of, and which he would stand fair for if Amnon the eldest son was taken off. When the word of command was given Absalom's servants failed not to execute it, being buoyed up with an opinion that their master, being now next heir to the crown (for Chileab was dead, as bishop Patrick thinks), would save them from harm. Now the threatened sword is drawn in David's house which should not depart from it. First, His eldest son falls by it, himself being, by his wickedness, the cause of it, and his father, by his connivance, accessory to it. Secondly, All his sons flee from it, and come home in terror, not knowing how far their brother Absalom's bloody design might extend. See what mischief sin makes in families.
Continue studying 2 Samuel 13:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
2 Samuel 13:26 captures a critical juncture in Absalom's calculated scheme to avenge his sister Tamar's rape by their half-brother Amnon. After two years of silent, simmering resentment, Absalom subtly yet persistently requests King David to allow Amnon to attend a sheep-shearing feast Absalom is hosting. This seemingly innocuous request, met with David's wary but ultimately insufficient question, reveals Absalom's profound cunning and sets the tragic stage for the premeditated murder of Amnon, exposing the deep dysfunction within David's royal household.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The exchange in 2 Samuel 13:26 is rich with literary devices that amplify its dramatic tension and thematic significance. Irony is profoundly prominent, as Absalom's polite and persistent request for Amnon's presence at a celebratory feast masks his true, murderous intent. The very act of inviting his "brother" to a joyous occasion is a meticulously planned setup for his demise, creating a stark contrast between outward appearance and inner motive. David's question, "Why should he go with thee?", also carries a powerful dramatic irony; the reader knows the terrible, hidden reason, while David remains tragically ignorant of the full extent of Absalom's malice. This dialogue also serves as potent foreshadowing, hinting at the violent climax that is about to unfold. The seemingly innocent exchange builds suspense, signaling to the astute reader that Amnon's presence at the feast will lead to a dire outcome. Furthermore, the entire interaction is a masterclass in dialogue, effectively revealing the characters' motivations and advancing the plot through their spoken words, with Absalom's calculated persistence contrasting sharply with David's hesitant and ultimately insufficient inquiry.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
This verse tragically illustrates the destructive power of unaddressed sin and the escalating cycle of violence that can erupt when justice is delayed or denied. Absalom's silent, festering hatred, fueled by David's failure to punish Amnon for the rape of Tamar, transforms into a calculated plot for vengeance. This passage serves as a stark reminder that sin, especially within leadership and family structures, has far-reaching and devastating consequences, often fulfilling divine warnings about the repercussions of disobedience. It underscores the importance of righteous judgment and the danger of allowing bitterness to take root, which can lead to further transgression and familial breakdown, ultimately eroding peace and order.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The scene in 2 Samuel 13:26 offers profound lessons for contemporary life, urging us to cultivate spiritual discernment, address injustice, and understand the corrosive nature of unresolved grievances. Absalom's chilling ability to cloak murderous intent in polite persistence reminds us that evil often operates subtly, hiding behind seemingly innocent requests or social niceties. We are called to be vigilant, not naive, and to pray for wisdom to discern the true motives of others, especially when something feels "off" or incongruous. Furthermore, David's tragic inaction in the face of Amnon's initial sin, and his subsequent failure to fully grasp Absalom's plot, serves as a powerful cautionary tale for parents, leaders, and indeed, all believers. Allowing sin to go unaddressed, whether in our own lives or in our spheres of influence, creates fertile ground for deeper resentment, bitterness, and further destructive behaviors. This narrative compels us to confront sin swiftly and righteously, to seek reconciliation where possible, and to understand that true peace comes not from avoiding difficult conversations or conflicts, but from courageously addressing the root causes of injustice and brokenness, seeking God's wisdom and grace to do so.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did David not immediately suspect Absalom's true intentions, given the history?
Answer: While David's question, "Why should he go with thee?", indicates a degree of unease or a lack of clear reasoning for Amnon's specific presence, he likely did not fully grasp the depth of Absalom's murderous intent for several reasons. Firstly, Absalom had maintained a two-year silence regarding Amnon's sin, which might have lulled David into a false sense of security that the matter, though unresolved, was not actively dangerous. Secondly, Absalom's request was couched in the culturally acceptable context of a festive sheep-shearing, making it appear outwardly innocuous and difficult to refuse without appearing ungracious. David may have been weary of family conflict and perhaps hoped that allowing Amnon to attend would foster some form of reconciliation or normalcy. His parental shortcomings, including a tendency towards passivity in disciplining his children (as seen with Adonijah in 1 Kings 1:6), contributed to his inability to perceive the imminent danger. Ultimately, David's discernment was insufficient to penetrate Absalom's carefully constructed facade of politeness and familial obligation, leading to tragic consequences.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The tragic events surrounding 2 Samuel 13:26, steeped in human vengeance and the devastating consequences of sin, find their ultimate contrast and fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While Absalom meticulously plans a feast of death for his brother, driven by a thirst for retribution, Jesus institutes a new covenant feast—the Lord's Supper—a meal of life, reconciliation, and remembrance of His sacrificial love, as recorded in Matthew 26:26-28. David's failure to administer justice and his lack of discernment lead to an escalating cycle of violence within his household, a stark reminder of humanity's inability to truly resolve the problem of sin and its effects. In contrast, Jesus, the perfect King, perfectly discerns the hearts of all men, as seen in John 2:24-25, and addresses sin not with human vengeance but with divine justice and mercy on the cross. He is the ultimate Lamb of God, who willingly lays down His life to take away the sin of the world, offering forgiveness and reconciliation rather than perpetuating cycles of hatred, as proclaimed by John the Baptist in John 1:29. Where Absalom's cunning leads to fratricide and David's house is plagued by the sword, Christ's perfect love and atoning sacrifice bring true peace, offering redemption from the curse of sin and establishing a kingdom where justice and righteousness reign eternally, as prophesied in Isaiah 9:6-7.