TRV
Translation
King James Version
And when they had told David, saying, Uriah went not down unto his house, David said unto Uriah, Camest thou not from thy journey? why then didst thou not go down unto thine house?
Complete Jewish Bible
When they told David, "Uriyah didn't go down to his house," David said to Uriyah, "Haven't you just arrived from a journey? Why didn't you go down to your house?"
Berean Standard Bible
And David was told, “Uriah did not go home.” “Haven’t you just arrived from a journey?” David asked Uriah. “Why didn’t you go home?”
American Standard Version
And when they had told David, saying, Uriah went not down unto his house, David said unto Uriah, Art thou not come from a journey? wherefore didst thou not go down unto thy house?
World English Bible Messianic
When they had told David, saying, “Uriah didn’t go down to his house,” David said to Uriah, “Haven’t you come from a journey? Why didn’t you go down to your house?”
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then they tolde Dauid, saying, Vriah went not downe to his house: and Dauid saide vnto Vriah, Commest thou not from thy iourney? why didst thou not go downe to thine house?
Young's Literal Translation
And they declare to David, saying, `Uriah hath not gone down unto his house;' and David saith unto Uriah, `Hast thou not come from a journey? wherefore hast thou not gone down unto thy house?'
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 8,270 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Samuel 11 verses 6–13
6 ¶ And David sent to Joab, saying, Send me Uriah the Hittite. And Joab sent Uriah to David.
7 And when Uriah was come unto him, David demanded of him how Joab did, and how the people did, and how the war prospered.
8 And David said to Uriah, Go down to thy house, and wash thy feet. And Uriah departed out of the king's house, and there followed him a mess of meat from the king.
9 But Uriah slept at the door of the king's house with all the servants of his lord, and went not down to his house.
10 And when they had told David, saying, Uriah went not down unto his house, David said unto Uriah, Camest thou not from thy journey? why then didst thou not go down unto thine house?
11 And Uriah said unto David, The ark, and Israel, and Judah, abide in tents; and my lord Joab, and the servants of my lord, are encamped in the open fields; shall I then go into mine house, to eat and to drink, and to lie with my wife? as thou livest, and as thy soul liveth, I will not do this thing.
12 And David said to Uriah, Tarry here to day also, and to morrow I will let thee depart. So Uriah abode in Jerusalem that day, and the morrow.
13 And when David had called him, he did eat and drink before him; and he made him drunk: and at even he went out to lie on his bed with the servants of his lord, but went not down to his house.
Uriah, we may suppose, had now been absent from his wife some weeks, making the campaign in the country of the Ammonites, and not intending to return till the end of it. The situation of his wife would bring to light the hidden works of darkness; and when Uriah, at his return, should find how he had been abused, and by whom, it might well be expected, 1. That he would prosecute his wife, according to law, and have her stoned to death; for jealousy is the rage of a man, especially a man of honour, and he that is thus injured will not spare in the day of vengeance, Pro 6:34. This Bath-sheba was apprehensive of when she sent to let David know she was with child, intimating that he was concerned to protect her, and, it is likely, if he had not promised her so to do (so wretchedly abusing his royal power), she would not have consented to him. Hope of impunity is a great encouragement to iniquity. 2. It might also be expected that since he could not prosecute David by law for an offence of this nature he would take his revenge another way, and raise a rebellion against him. There have been instances of kings who by provocations of this nature, given to some of their powerful subjects, have lost their crowns. To prevent this double mischief, David endeavours to father the child which should be born upon Uriah himself, and therefore sends for him home to stay a night or two with his wife. Observe,
I. How the plot was laid. Uriah must come home from the army under pretence of bringing David an account how the war prospered, and how they went on with the siege of Rabbah, Sa2 11:7. Thus does he pretend a more than ordinary concern for his army when that was the least thing in his thoughts; if he had not had another turn to serve, an express of much less figure than Uriah might have sufficed to bring him a report of the state of the war. David, having had as much conference with Uriah as he thought requisite to cover the design, sent him to his house, and, that he might be the more pleasant there with the wife of his youth, sent a dish of meat after him for their supper, Sa2 11:8. When that project failed the first night, and Uriah, being weary of his journey and more desirous of sleep than meat, lay all night in the guard-chamber, the next night he made him drunk (Sa2 11:13), or made him merry, tempted him to drink more than was fit, that he might forget his vow (Sa2 11:11), and might be disposed to go home to his own bed, to which perhaps, if David could have made him dead drunk, he would have ordered him to be carried. It is a very wicked thing, upon any design whatsoever, to make a person drunk. Woe to him that does so, Hab 2:15, Hab 2:16. God will put a cup of trembling into the hands of those who put into the hands of others the cup of drunkenness. Robbing a man of his reason is worse than robbing him of his money, and drawing him into sin worse than drawing him into any trouble whatsoever. Every good man, especially every magistrate, should endeavour to prevent this sin, by admonishing, restraining, and denying the glass to those whom they see falling into excess; but to further it is to do the devil's work, to officiate as factor for him.
II. How this plot was defeated by Uriah's firm resolution not to lie in his own bed. Both nights he slept with the life-guard, and went not down to his house, though, it is probable, his wife pressed him to do it as much as David, Sa2 11:9, Sa2 11:12. Now, 1. Some think he suspected what was done, being informed of his wife's attendance at court, and therefore he would not go near her. But if he had had any suspicion of that kind, surely he would have opened the letter that David sent by him to Joab. 2. Whether he suspected any thing or no, Providence put this resolution into his heart, and kept him to it, for the discovering of David's sin, and that the baffling of his design to conceal it might awaken David's conscience to confess it and repent of it. 3. The reason he gave to David for this strange instance of self-denial and mortification was very noble, Sa2 11:11. While the army was encamped in the field, he would not lie at ease in his own house. "The ark is in a tent," whether at home, in the tent David had pitched for it, or abroad, with Joab in the camp, is not certain. "Joab, and all the mighty men of Israel, lie hard and uneasy, and much exposed to the weather and to the enemy; and shall I go and take my ease and pleasure at my own house?" No, he protests he will not do it. Now, (1.) This was in itself a generous resolution, and showed Uriah to be a man of a public spirit, bold and hardy, and mortified to the delights of sense. In times of public difficulty and danger it does not become us to repose ourselves in security, or roll ourselves in pleasure, or, with the king and Haman, to sit down to drink when the city Shushan was perplexed, Est 3:15. We should voluntarily endure hardness when the church of God is constrained to endure it. (2.) It might have been of use to awaken David's conscience, and make his heart to smite him for what he had done. [1.] That he had basely abused so brave a man as Uriah was, a man so heartily concerned for him and his kingdom, and that acted for him and it with so much vigour. [2.] That he was himself so unlike him. The consideration of the public hardships and hazards kept Uriah from lawful pleasures, yet could not keep David, though more nearly interested, from unlawful ones. Uriah's severity to himself should have shamed David for his indulgence of himself. The law was, When the host goeth forth against the enemy then, in a special manner, keep thyself from every wicked thing, Deu 23:9. Uriah outdid that law, but David violated it.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–13. Public domain.
Copy as
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
Apology for the Prophet David, Chapter 1
We have taken up the task of writing an apology for the present style of the prophet David, not because he needs this gift, who has excelled in such great merits and flourished in virtues, but because many people, reading the sequence of his deeds without considering the power of the Scriptures or the hidden mysteries, wonder how such a great prophet did not avoid the contagion of adultery first and then of murder.
Therefore, it was our desire to review the history itself, which seems to have been exposed to sin. For in the second book of Kings (2 Samuel 11:2-27), we read that while David was walking in his royal palace, he saw a woman bathing (her name was Bathsheba), of remarkable beauty and grace, with a very attractive face, and he was overcome by the desire to possess her. However, the woman was married to a man named Uriah, and the scene of his death was arranged by royal command. For although it had no effect on his desire, yet it was considered to greatly impede his sense of shame for adultery.
Therefore, let us begin with the most obvious, whom God justified, so that you may not judge. 'For it is of little concern to me,' says Paul, 'that I should be judged by you or by any human court; indeed, I do not even judge myself' (1 Corinthians 4:3). Even though he was still in the body and subject to temptation, he did not judge himself because a spiritual person is not judged by anyone but God alone. Finally, he added, 'The one who judges me is the Lord' (1 Corinthians 4:4). Therefore, do not judge anything before the appointed time (ibid., 4 and 5). But David has already fulfilled his time and has earned grace, and he is justified by Christ; since David himself rejoiced in being called the son of the Lord, and those who confessed him in this way were enlightened. Why do you call a man of God from a reward to judgment? The Lord has already judged him, of whom he said to Solomon: If you walk before me as your father David walked in the holiness of heart and righteousness, in order to do everything I commanded him (3 Kings 9:4). Is he worthy of judgment or reward, who has done everything according to heavenly commands, walking in holiness and righteousness of heart? Where the vices and sins of others are hidden, there David receives divine testimony of his virtue and glory. And we discuss his sin in vain, for it is through his merit and grace that the sins of others have been revealed. For when Solomon sinned by not keeping the Lord's commands and God intended to divide his kingdom into many parts, He said to him: However, I will not do this in your days because of your father David. I will take it from the hand of your son. However, I will not take the whole kingdom; I will give him one scepter because of my servant David (3 Kings 11:12-13). Therefore, since the Lord justifies, who is there to condemn? What God has cleansed, you must not call common (Acts 10:15).
Nevertheless, with due regard to heavenly judgment, in which you honor the prophet even more, enter into his actions and behaviors. Do not marvel at the man, and do not judge him to be equal to the angels, because he has spent most of his life, even from childhood, dwelling in riches, honors, and positions of power, and has been subjected to many temptations. He has only once given in to error, and it is through this error that even the angels of heaven, as Scripture recounts (Genesis 6:2), were cast down from their virtue and grace. Indeed, another error of his is mentioned, that he caused the people to be counted.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 2 Samuel 11:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
This verse captures King David's escalating manipulation and Uriah the Hittite's unwavering integrity, forming a critical juncture in the narrative of David's sin with Bathsheba. Following Uriah's unexpected refusal to return to his home, which would have conveniently concealed Bathsheba's pregnancy, David directly confronts him. Feigning concern, David questions Uriah's decision not to seek the comfort of his house after a journey, highlighting David's deepening moral compromise and Uriah's profound commitment to duty and solidarity with his fellow soldiers on the battlefield. This exchange sets the stage for David's increasingly desperate and tragic actions.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The passage is rich in literary devices that enhance its dramatic and thematic impact. Irony is profoundly evident, as David, the king and spiritual leader, is revealed to be morally corrupt and manipulative, while Uriah, a foreign mercenary, embodies profound loyalty and integrity. David's questions, ostensibly about Uriah's comfort, are deeply ironic given his true, sinister intentions to cover his own sin. There is also a strong contrast between David's self-serving deception and Uriah's selfless dedication to duty and solidarity with his fellow soldiers. The dialogue itself is a key device, as David's seemingly innocuous questions are loaded with ulterior motives, creating dramatic tension and revealing the king's increasingly desperate moral decline. The repeated use of the verb "go down" (Hebrew: yarad) can be seen as a form of repetition, emphasizing David's expectation and Uriah's unexpected defiance of it, highlighting the clash between the king's will and Uriah's unwavering principles.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
This pivotal interaction in 2 Samuel 11:10 serves as a stark biblical illustration of the escalating nature of unconfessed sin and the profound value of integrity. David's initial sin of adultery quickly necessitates further deception and manipulation, demonstrating how one transgression, when concealed, can ensnare an individual in a complex web of lies and increasingly severe actions. The narrative underscores the biblical principle that sin, especially when hidden, does not remain dormant but actively seeks to propagate itself, leading to deeper moral compromise and ultimately, divine judgment. Uriah's unwavering integrity, in contrast, serves as a powerful example of faithfulness to one's calling and community, even when it means rejecting personal comfort or defying the implicit will of a powerful authority. This passage reminds us that true honor is found not in status or power, but in moral uprightness and adherence to a higher calling, emphasizing the destructive power of deceit versus the liberating power of truth.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The narrative of 2 Samuel 11:10 offers profound lessons for contemporary believers, illustrating the destructive path of deception that follows moral compromise. David's desperate attempts to cover his sin reveal that once integrity is breached, it often requires further, more egregious actions to maintain the facade. This serves as a potent warning against allowing sin to fester unconfessed, as it inevitably leads to deeper moral decay and greater, often public, consequences. Uriah, on the other hand, stands as a compelling model of unwavering loyalty, discipline, and moral rectitude. His refusal to indulge in personal comfort while his comrades faced hardship exemplifies a profound sense of duty and solidarity, challenging us to consider our own priorities and commitments in light of our community and calling. For believers today, this passage emphasizes the critical importance of transparency, accountability, and standing firm in one's convictions, even when inconvenient or pressured by authority. It calls us to cultivate a character marked by integrity, acknowledging that true freedom and peace come from living authentically before God and others, rather than attempting to hide our failures.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Question: Why was Uriah's refusal to go home so significant to David's plan?
Answer: Uriah's refusal directly thwarted David's meticulously crafted plan to conceal his adultery with Bathsheba. David had recalled Uriah from the battlefield, hoping he would naturally go home and sleep with his wife. This would have made Uriah the presumptive father of Bathsheba's child, thereby covering David's sin and avoiding public scandal or the severe legal consequences of adultery (which could include death, as per Leviticus 20:10). Uriah's unexpected integrity and commitment to military protocol foiled this initial scheme, forcing David to resort to even more desperate and ultimately murderous measures.
Question: Was Uriah aware of David's sin or his manipulative intentions?
Answer: The biblical text does not explicitly state that Uriah was aware of David's adultery or his specific manipulative intentions. Uriah's explanation in 2 Samuel 11:11 focuses on his deep sense of duty and solidarity with his fellow soldiers and the Ark of the Covenant, which were still in the field. His actions appear to stem from an intrinsic, unwavering commitment to military and perhaps religious purity laws, rather than a conscious defiance of David based on suspicion. He was a man of profound integrity, making him an unwitting, yet formidable, obstacle to David's deceit.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The tragic narrative of 2 Samuel 11:10, with David's manipulative deceit contrasting sharply with Uriah's unwavering integrity, finds its ultimate fulfillment and resolution in the person and work of Jesus Christ. David, though once described as a "man after God's own heart," falls into grievous sin and attempts to cover it through deception and ultimately murder, revealing the pervasive nature of human depravity and the failure of even the best of humanity to maintain perfect righteousness. In stark contrast, Jesus, the true King and Son of David, embodies perfect integrity and unwavering loyalty to God's will. He never sought to cover His own sin, for He had none, but instead came to bear the sin of the world, fulfilling the ultimate sacrifice as the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!. While Uriah's integrity was admirable, it was limited by human frailty; Christ's obedience was perfect and complete, even to the point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:8). He is the High Priest who was tempted in every way, just as we are, yet He did not sin, offering Himself as the spotless sacrifice so that we, through faith, might become the righteousness of God in Him (2 Corinthians 5:21). Thus, where David failed in integrity and sought to hide his sin, Christ perfectly fulfilled righteousness and openly bore the consequences of humanity's sin, offering true forgiveness and restoration.