TRV
Translation
King James Version
And David said unto him, From whence comest thou? And he said unto him, Out of the camp of Israel am I escaped.
Complete Jewish Bible
David said to him, "Where are you coming from?""I escaped from the camp of Isra'el," he replied.
Berean Standard Bible
“Where have you come from?” David asked. “I have escaped from the Israelite camp,” he replied.
American Standard Version
And David said unto him, From whence comest thou? And he said unto him, Out of the camp of Israel am I escaped.
World English Bible Messianic
David said to him, “Where do you come from?” He said to him, “I have escaped out of the camp of Israel.”
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then Dauid saide vnto him, Whence commest thou? And he said vnto him, Out of the host of Israel I am escaped.
Young's Literal Translation
And David saith to him, `Whence comest thou?' and he saith unto him, `Out of the camp of Israel I have escaped.'
See also
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 8,026 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Samuel 1 verses 1–10
1 ¶ Now it came to pass after the death of Saul, when David was returned from the slaughter of the Amalekites, and David had abode two days in Ziklag;
2 It came even to pass on the third day, that, behold, a man came out of the camp from Saul with his clothes rent, and earth upon his head: and so it was, when he came to David, that he fell to the earth, and did obeisance.
3 And David said unto him, From whence comest thou? And he said unto him, Out of the camp of Israel am I escaped.
4 And David said unto him, How went the matter? I pray thee, tell me. And he answered, That the people are fled from the battle, and many of the people also are fallen and dead; and Saul and Jonathan his son are dead also.
5 And David said unto the young man that told him, How knowest thou that Saul and Jonathan his son be dead?
6 And the young man that told him said, As I happened by chance upon mount Gilboa, behold, Saul leaned upon his spear; and, lo, the chariots and horsemen followed hard after him.
7 And when he looked behind him, he saw me, and called unto me. And I answered, Here am I.
8 And he said unto me, Who art thou? And I answered him, I am an Amalekite.
9 He said unto me again, Stand, I pray thee, upon me, and slay me: for anguish is come upon me, because my life is yet whole in me.
10 So I stood upon him, and slew him, because I was sure that he could not live after that he was fallen: and I took the crown that was upon his head, and the bracelet that was on his arm, and have brought them hither unto my lord.
Here is, I. David settling again in Ziklag, his own city, after he had rescued his family and friends out of the hands of the Amalekites (Sa2 1:1): He abode in Ziklag. Thence he was now sending presents to his friends (Sa1 30:26), and there he was ready to receive those that came into his interests; not men in distress and debt, as his first followers were, but persons of quality in their country, mighty men, men of war, and captains of thousands (as we find, Ch1 12:1, Ch1 12:8, Ch1 12:20); such came day by day to him, God stirring up their hearts to do so, till he had a great host, like the host of God, as it is said, Ch1 12:22. The secret springs of revolutions are unaccountable, and must be resolved into that Providence which turns all hearts as the rivers of water.
II. Intelligence brought him thither of the death of Saul. It was strange that he did not leave some spies about the camp, to bring him early notice of the issue of the engagement, a sign that he desired not Saul's woeful day, nor was impatient to come to the throne, but willing to wait till those tidings were brought to him which many a one would have sent more than half-way to meet. He that believes does not make haste, takes good news when it comes and is not uneasy while it is in the coming. 1. The messenger presents himself to David as an express, in the posture of a mourner for the deceased prince and a subject to the succeeding one. He came with his clothes rent, and made obeisance to David (Sa2 1:2), pleasing himself with the fancy that he had the honour to be the first that did him homage as his sovereign, but it proved he was the first that received from him sentence of death as his judge. He told David he came from the camp of Israel, and intimated the bad posture it was in when he said he had escaped out of it, having much ado to get away with his life, Sa2 1:3. 2. He gives him a general account of the issue of the battle. David was very desirous to know how the matter went, as one that had more reason than any to be concerned for the public; and he told him very distinctly that the army of Israel was routed, many slain, and, among the rest, Saul and Jonathan, Sa2 1:4. He named only Saul and Jonathan, because he knew David would be most solicitous to know their fate; for Saul was the man whom he most feared and Jonathan the man whom he most loved. 3. He gives him a more particular account of the death of Saul. It is probable that David had heard, by the report of others, what the issue of the war was, for multitudes resorted to him, it should seem, in consequence; but he was desirous to know the certainty of the report concerning Saul and Jonathan, either because he was not forward to believe it or because he would not proceed upon it to make his own claims till he was fully assured of it. He therefore asks, How knowest thou that Saul and Jonathan are dead? in answer to which the young man tells him a very ready story, putting it past doubt that Saul was dead, for he himself had been not only an eye-witness of his death, but an instrument of it, and therefore David might rely upon his testimony. He says nothing, in his narrative, of the death of Jonathan, knowing how ungrateful that would be to David, but accounts only for Saul, thinking (as David understood it well enough, Sa2 4:10) that he should be welcome for that, and rewarded as one that brought good tidings. The account he gives of this matter is, (1.) Very particular. That he happened to go to the place where Saul was (Sa2 1:6) as a passenger, not as a soldier, and therefore an indifferent person, that he found Saul endeavouring to run himself through with his own spear, none of his attendants being willing to do it for him; and, it seems, he could not do it dexterously for himself: his hand and heart failed him. The miserable man had not courage enough either to live or die; he therefore called this stranger to him (Sa2 1:7), enquired what countryman he was, for, provided he was not a Philistine, he would gladly receive from his hand the coup de grace (as the French call it concerning those that are broken on the wheel) - the merciful stroke, that might dispatch him out of his pain. Understanding that he was an Amalekite (neither one of his subjects nor one of his enemies), he begs this favour from him (Sa2 1:9): Stand upon me, and slay me. He is now sick of his dignity and willing to be trampled upon, sick of his life and willing to be slain. Who then would be inordinately fond of life or honour? The case may he such, even with those that have no hope in their death, that yet they may desire to die, and death flee from them, Rev 9:6. Anguish has come upon me; so we read it, as a complaint of the pain and terror his spirit was seized with. If his conscience now brought to mind the javelin he had cast at David, his pride, malice, and perfidiousness, and especially the murder of the priests, no marvel that anguish came upon him: moles (they say) open their eyes when they are dying. Sense of unpardoned guilt will make death indeed the king of terrors. Those that have baffled their convictions will perhaps, in their dying moments, be overpowered by them. The margin reads it as a complaint of the inconvenience of his clothes; that his coat of mail which he had for defence, or his embroidered coat which he had for ornament, hindered him, that he could not get the spear far enough into his body, or so straitened him, now that his body swelled with anguish, that he could not expire. Let no man's clothes be his pride, for it may so happen that they may be his burden and snare. "Hereupon," saith our young man, "I stood upon him, and slew him" (Sa2 1:10) at which word, perhaps, he observed David look upon him with some show of displeasure, and therefore he excuses himself in the next words: "For I was sure he could not live; his life was whole in him indeed, but he would certainly have fallen into the hands of the Philistines or given himself another thrust." (2.) It is doubtful whether this story be true. If it be, the righteousness of God is to be observed, that Saul, who spared the Amalekites in contempt of the divine command, received his death's wound from an Amalekite. But most interpreters think that it was false, and that, though he might happen to be present, yet he was not assisting in the death of Saul, but told David so in expectation that he would reward him for it, as having done him a piece of good service. Those who would rejoice at the fall of an enemy are apt to measure others by themselves, and to think that they will do so too. But a man after God's own heart is not to be judged of by common men. I am not clear whether this young man's story was true or no: it may consist with the narrative in the chapter before, and be an addition to it, as Peter's account of the death of Judas (Act 1:18) is to the narrative, Mat 27:5. What is there called a sword may here be called a spear, or when he fell upon his sword he leaned on his spear. (3.) However he produced that which was proof sufficient of the death of Saul, the crown that was upon his head and the bracelet that was on his arm. It should seem Saul was so foolishly fond of these as to wear them in the field of battle, which made him a fair mark for the archers, by distinguishing him from those about him; but as pride (we say) feels no cold, so it fears no danger, from that which gratifies it. These fell into the hands of this Amalekite. Saul spared the best of their spoil, and now the best of his came to one of that devoted nation. He brought them to David, as the rightful owner of them now that Saul was dead, not doubting but by his officiousness herein to recommend himself to the best preferments in his court or camp. The tradition of the Jews is that this Amalekite was the son of Doeg (for the Amalekites were descendants from Edom), and that Doeg, who they suppose was Saul's armour-bearer, before he slew himself gave Saul's crown and bracelet (the ensigns of his royalty) to his son, and bade him carry them to David, to curry favour with him. But this is a groundless conceit. Doeg's son, it is likely, was so well known to Saul that he needed not ask him as he did this Amalekite (Sa2 1:8), Who art thou? David had been long waiting for the crown, and now it was brought to him by an Amalekite. See how God can serve his own purposes of kindness to his people, even by designing (ill-designing) men, who aim at nothing but to set up themselves.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–10. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 2 Samuel 1:3 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
2 Samuel 1:3 marks the dramatic opening of the book, capturing the immediate aftermath of Israel's devastating defeat on Mount Gilboa and the death of King Saul. This terse yet profoundly significant exchange between David, who has just returned to Ziklag, and a lone Amalekite messenger, sets the stage for the revelation of the national catastrophe. David's urgent inquiry reveals his desperate need for news from the battlefield, while the messenger's concise reply immediately signals a catastrophic event, preparing David and the reader for the grim details of Saul and Jonathan's demise and the inevitable transition of leadership in Israel.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The brevity and directness of 2 Samuel 1:3 are masterfully employed to create a powerful dramatic effect. The passage primarily utilizes Direct Speech, allowing the reader to hear the urgent inquiry of David and the immediate, ominous reply of the messenger, which heightens the sense of immediacy and realism. There is a strong element of Suspense, as the messenger's answer, "Out of the camp of Israel am I escaped," confirms David's fears of a disaster without revealing the full extent of it, leaving both David and the reader in eager anticipation of the details. This creates Dramatic Irony, as the reader is already aware of Saul's death from 1 Samuel 31, while David is not, adding a layer of tragic foreknowledge. The messenger's disheveled appearance (mentioned in 2 Samuel 1:2) combined with his terse answer functions as powerful Foreshadowing, signaling the tragic news to come. The entire exchange serves as a concise yet impactful Exposition, quickly setting the scene and emotional tone for the profound lament and pivotal transition that will define the opening chapters of 2 Samuel.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
This brief exchange in 2 Samuel 1:3 is deeply significant for understanding the unfolding of God's sovereign plan for Israel. It marks the divinely appointed end of Saul's reign, a reign characterized by disobedience and a rejection of God's commands, and the imminent beginning of David's kingship, which God had promised. The arrival of the messenger, bearing news of national catastrophe, is not merely a random event but part of God's providential working to bring about the transition of leadership. It underscores that even in moments of profound human tragedy and national crisis, God remains in control, moving His purposes forward. The "escape" of the messenger symbolizes the precariousness of life and the reality of divine preservation, even amidst widespread death, highlighting God's ability to preserve a remnant or an individual for His greater purposes, ultimately for the fulfillment of His covenant promises.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The terse exchange in 2 Samuel 1:3 offers profound insights into the human experience of waiting for crucial, life-altering news and the weight of bearing such information. David's urgent question reflects a universal human anxiety when facing uncertainty, particularly concerning the well-being of loved ones or the fate of significant endeavors. It reminds us of the emotional burden carried by those who await news from the front lines of life's battles—whether literal wars, health crises, or significant life transitions. The messenger's simple declaration of escape underscores the fragility of life and the reality that even in devastating circumstances, some are miraculously preserved. For us, this passage encourages a posture of trust in God's sovereignty even amidst chaos and uncertainty, recognizing that His purposes unfold even through difficult news. It also challenges us to consider how we receive and deliver news, especially difficult truths, with sensitivity, wisdom, and compassion, understanding the profound impact our words can have on those who are vulnerable or grieving.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Who was the Amalekite messenger, and why is his identity significant?
Answer: The messenger is identified as an Amalekite in 2 Samuel 1:8. His identity is highly significant for several reasons. Firstly, the Amalekites were ancient, persistent enemies of Israel, whom God had commanded Saul to utterly destroy (as detailed in 1 Samuel 15). Saul's failure to fully obey this command was a major factor in God's rejection of him as king. The irony is profound: an Amalekite, whom Saul spared, now brings news of Saul's death. Secondly, the messenger's account of Saul's death (claiming he killed Saul at Saul's request in 2 Samuel 1:9-10) is contradicted by the account in 1 Samuel 31, which states Saul fell on his own sword. This suggests the Amalekite fabricated his story, likely hoping to gain favor with David by claiming credit for ending Saul's life, whom he might have perceived as David's enemy. This deception ultimately leads to his own execution by David, who viewed the Lord's anointed as sacred and would not tolerate such a claim, especially from an enemy of Israel.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The arrival of the messenger in 2 Samuel 1:3 and the subsequent news of Saul's death, while a moment of profound national grief, ultimately points to the greater, divinely ordained transition of kingship that finds its ultimate fulfillment in Christ. Saul's failed kingship, marked by disobedience and culminating in death, foreshadows the inadequacy of human leadership and the desperate need for a perfect King. David, though flawed, is a type of Christ, chosen by God to shepherd His people with a heart after God's own (Acts 13:22). However, even David's glorious reign was temporary and imperfect, ultimately pointing to a greater, eternal King. The true "escape" and ultimate deliverance from the "camp" of sin and death is found not in human effort or military prowess but in Jesus Christ. He is the ultimate messenger, bringing the good news of salvation (Luke 4:18-19), having Himself "escaped" the grave through His glorious resurrection, triumphing over sin and death once for all (Romans 6:9-10). The news of His victory, unlike the tragic news brought to David, brings eternal life and hope to all who believe. Just as David was God's chosen king to lead Israel, Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, whose eternal kingdom will never end (Luke 1:33). His coming marks the definitive transition from the old covenant to the new, from the reign of sin and death to the reign of grace and life (Romans 5:21), offering true and lasting escape from spiritual bondage.