Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And they set them up images and groves in every high hill, and under every green tree:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And they set them up H5324 images H4676 and groves H842 in every high H1364 hill H1389, and under every green H7488 tree H6086:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
They set up standing-stones and sacred poles for themselves on any high hill and under any green tree.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
They set up for themselves sacred pillars and Asherah poles on every high hill and under every green tree.
Ask
American Standard Version
and they set them up pillars and Asherim upon every high hill, and under every green tree;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and they set them up pillars and Asherah poles on every high hill, and under every green tree;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And had made them images and groues vpon euery hie hill, and vnder euery greene tree,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and set up for them standing-pillars and shrines on every high height, and under every green tree,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Second Kings 17:10 serves as a poignant indictment of the Northern Kingdom of Israel's pervasive and deeply entrenched idolatry, illustrating a key reason for their impending exile. The verse vividly describes how the Israelites, in direct defiance of God's covenant commands, erected pagan "images" (stone pillars) and "groves" (cultic poles or trees dedicated to the goddess Asherah) across the land. This widespread apostasy, practiced "in every high hill, and under every green tree," underscores the totality of their spiritual rebellion and their adoption of the very Canaanite worship practices God had commanded them to eradicate.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within 2 Kings 17, a pivotal chapter that provides a theological explanation for the downfall and exile of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. Following decades of spiritual decline, marked by a succession of ungodly kings and widespread societal apostasy, the narrative culminates in the Assyrian conquest of Samaria and the deportation of the Israelites, as recounted in 2 Kings 17:6. Verses 7-18 serve as a divine commentary, detailing the specific sins that provoked God's judgment. Verse 10 specifically describes the physical manifestations of their idolatry, building upon the general accusation in 2 Kings 17:9 that "the children of Israel did secretly those things that were not right against the Lord their God, and they built them high places in all their cities." It precedes further accusations of spiritual prostitution in 2 Kings 17:11 and a rejection of God's statutes and covenant in 2 Kings 17:15.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period leading up to the fall of the Northern Kingdom was characterized by significant political instability and intense religious syncretism. Israel, surrounded by powerful pagan nations, frequently succumbed to the temptation to adopt foreign deities and worship practices. Canaanite religion, with its emphasis on fertility cults involving gods like Baal and goddesses like Asherah, was particularly alluring. High hills and green trees were traditional sites for Canaanite worship, believed to be sacred spaces connected to nature deities. By establishing their "images" and "groves" in these locations, the Israelites were not merely dabbling in foreign worship; they were fully embracing and integrating it into their national life, directly violating the Mosaic Law's prohibition against idolatry and the command to destroy all such pagan sites upon entering the land, as explicitly stated in Deuteronomy 12:2-3.
  • Key Themes: Second Kings 17:10 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within 2 Kings and the broader Deuteronomistic History. Firstly, it highlights the theme of Pervasive Idolatry and Apostasy, demonstrating the depth of Israel's spiritual rebellion and their consistent breach of the covenant. Their worship of false gods was not isolated but deeply ingrained, a direct violation of the first two commandments. Secondly, the verse underscores the Consequences of Disobedience, serving as a crucial explanation for the impending judgment and exile. It vividly illustrates God's holiness and His demand for exclusive devotion, showing that covenant unfaithfulness has severe repercussions, as warned in Deuteronomy 28. Lastly, it exemplifies Syncretism, where Israel blended the worship of Yahweh with pagan rituals, a practice strictly forbidden by God and seen as spiritual adultery, leading to their ultimate downfall.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Images (Hebrew, matstsêbâh', H4676): This Hebrew term (H4676) refers to a standing pillar, often a stone monument. While a matstsêbâh could be used for legitimate purposes (e.g., Jacob's pillar in Genesis 28:18), in the context of pagan worship, it specifically denotes cultic pillars or altars erected to honor foreign gods like Baal. Their erection was a direct affront to Yahweh's exclusive claim to Israel's worship, symbolizing a stationing or setting up of something that rivals God.
  • Groves (Hebrew, ʼăshêrâh', H842): This word (H842) can refer to the Canaanite goddess Asherah herself, her cult image, or a sacred wooden pole or tree used in her worship. Asherah was the consort of Baal, a prominent fertility deity in Canaanite religion. The presence of ʼăshêrâh' poles signifies a deep embrace of Canaanite fertility cults, which often involved immoral practices, directly contrasting the purity and holiness demanded by Yahweh. The term itself is rooted in a word meaning "happy," ironically pointing to the supposed prosperity gained through pagan worship.
  • High hill (Hebrew, gâbôahh' H1364, gibʻâh', H1364): This phrase, combining gâbôahh ("elevated" or "high") and gibʻâh ("a hillock" or "hill"), points to the geographical ubiquity of Israel's idolatry. Elevated places were commonly associated with divinity in ancient Near Eastern religions, believed to be closer to the heavens and thus more suitable for encountering gods. For Israel, these became "high places" (bamot), condemned sites of illicit worship, representing an arrogant elevation of human will over divine command.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And they set them up images and groves": This clause highlights the active and intentional nature of Israel's apostasy. They were not merely passively allowing paganism but were actively establishing and promoting it. The "images" (matstsebah) were likely stone pillars or altars, and the "groves" (asherah) were cultic wooden poles or sacred trees dedicated to Canaanite deities, particularly Asherah. This action, initiated by the people ("they set them up" from H5324 nâtsab), was a direct and flagrant violation of God's commands to destroy such pagan objects and worship Him exclusively.
  • "in every high hill": This phrase emphasizes the widespread nature of their idolatry across the Northern Kingdom. "High hills" were traditional sites for pagan rituals, often chosen for their perceived sacredness or connection to nature deities. For Israel, these became "high places" (bamot), condemned sites of illicit worship, contrasting sharply with God's command to worship only at the central sanctuary He designated. The use of "every" suggests a pervasive, almost complete, saturation of the land with these idolatrous practices.
  • "and under every green tree": This parallel phrase further underscores the totality and pervasiveness of Israel's apostasy. "Green trees" (from H7488 raʻănân, meaning "verdant" or "flourishing," and H6086 ʻêts, meaning "tree" or "wood") were also common locations for pagan worship, often associated with fertility rites and nature worship due to their vibrant, flourishing appearance. The imagery evokes a scene where no part of the land, no natural landmark, was free from the stain of Israel's spiritual unfaithfulness. Together with "every high hill," it paints a picture of a nation utterly consumed by idolatry.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several powerful literary devices to convey the depth of Israel's apostasy. Hyperbole is evident in the phrases "every high hill, and under every green tree," which, while not necessarily literal, effectively communicates the pervasive and widespread nature of their idolatry across the entire land. This exaggeration emphasizes the totality of their rebellion. Imagery is vividly used, painting a picture of stone pillars and wooden poles dotting the landscape, a constant visual reminder of Israel's unfaithfulness. This visual imagery makes the spiritual reality tangible and stark. Furthermore, the verse utilizes Parallelism with the repetition of the structure "in every [location type], and under every [location type]," which reinforces the idea of comprehensive and ubiquitous idolatry. This structural repetition creates a rhythmic emphasis on the extent of their sin.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Second Kings 17:10 stands as a stark testament to the consequences of covenant unfaithfulness and the seductive power of idolatry. Theologically, it highlights God's absolute demand for exclusive worship, rooted in His unique identity as the one true God who delivered Israel from slavery. Their adoption of "images and groves" was not merely a cultural adaptation but a profound betrayal of their covenant relationship, a spiritual adultery that provoked divine jealousy. This widespread apostasy demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of God's character and a rejection of His redemptive history. The verse serves as a sober warning that spiritual compromise, even if seemingly minor, can lead to national ruin and divine judgment.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While modern believers may not literally set up stone images or wooden poles, 2 Kings 17:10 offers profound and enduring lessons for contemporary spiritual life. The pervasive nature of Israel's sin, reaching "every high hill, and under every green tree," challenges us to examine the subtle and often insidious ways idolatry can infiltrate our own hearts and societies. Idolatry, at its core, is anything that takes God's rightful place of supreme affection, trust, and devotion in our lives. This could be career success, financial security, personal comfort, social media validation, relationships, political ideologies, or even our own self-image. The verse calls us to a radical and exclusive devotion to God, recognizing that spiritual compromise, even in seemingly benign forms, ultimately leads to spiritual barrenness and separation from the life-giving presence of God. It compels us to rigorously self-examine our priorities and allegiances, ensuring that our worship of God remains pure and undivided, free from syncretism with worldly values or self-serving ambitions.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "images" or "groves" might I be setting up in my own life, consciously or unconsciously, that compete for God's supreme place in my heart?
  • How might the "high hills" and "green trees" of my contemporary culture (e.g., media, consumerism, social trends) subtly invite me to worship something other than God?
  • In what areas of my life am I tempted to blend Christian faith with worldly values or practices, rather than maintaining exclusive devotion to Christ?

FAQ

What exactly were "images" and "groves" in this context?

Answer: In 2 Kings 17:10, "images" (Hebrew: matstsebah) typically refers to standing stone pillars or monuments. While some pillars could be legitimate memorial stones, in this context, they were cultic objects erected for pagan worship, often dedicated to gods like Baal. "Groves" (Hebrew: asherah) refers to cultic wooden poles or sacred trees. These were symbols of the Canaanite goddess Asherah, often depicted as the consort of Baal and associated with fertility rites. Their presence signified the adoption of Canaanite religious practices, which were strictly forbidden by God's law (see Deuteronomy 7:5).

Why were "high hills" and "green trees" significant for worship?

Answer: In the ancient Near East, elevated places like "high hills" were often considered sacred, believed to be closer to the divine realm and thus suitable for encountering gods or performing rituals. Similarly, "green trees" (often large, ancient trees) were seen as sacred symbols of life, fertility, or the presence of deities. For the Canaanites, these natural sites were integral to their worship of nature deities. For Israel, however, God had commanded worship at a single, designated sanctuary (e.g., Deuteronomy 12:5-7), making worship at these "high places" a direct act of disobedience and syncretism, even if ostensibly directed toward Yahweh.

What was the primary sin described in this verse, and why was it so serious?

Answer: The primary sin described in 2 Kings 17:10 is idolatry and covenant unfaithfulness. It was serious because it violated the very first commandments given to Israel: "You shall have no other gods before me" and "You shall not make for yourself a carved image" (Exodus 20:3-4). Israel's covenant with Yahweh was predicated on exclusive devotion. By setting up images and groves, they were not only worshipping false gods but also betraying the God who had delivered them from slavery in Egypt and established them as His chosen people. This spiritual adultery was a direct affront to God's holiness and His jealous love for His people, leading directly to the judgment of exile.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Second Kings 17:10, with its stark depiction of pervasive idolatry, finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus, who is the sole worthy object of worship and the one who liberates humanity from the bondage of false gods. The "images and groves" of Israel's past represent humanity's universal tendency to create gods in its own image or to worship creation rather than the Creator (Romans 1:25). Jesus, as the incarnate God, perfectly embodies the exclusive devotion demanded by the Father. He came not to establish new "high places" or "green trees" for worship, but to declare that true worship is "in spirit and truth" (John 4:23-24), transcending physical locations and ritual objects. Through His atoning sacrifice on the cross, Jesus provides the means for humanity to be cleansed from the idolatry of the heart, which Paul identifies as covetousness (Colossians 3:5). He calls His followers to put off the old self, which is corrupted by deceitful desires, and to put on the new self, created to be like God in righteousness and holiness (Ephesians 4:22-24). Thus, the judgment on Israel's idolatry serves as a dark backdrop against which the glorious light of Christ's redemptive work shines, inviting all to turn from dead idols to serve the living and true God (1 Thessalonians 1:9-10).

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Kings 17 verses 7–23

Though the destruction of the kingdom of the ten tribes was but briefly related, it is in these verses largely commented upon by our historian, and the reasons of it assigned, not taken from the second causes - the weakness of Israel, their impolitic management, and the strength and growing greatness of the Assyrian monarch (these things are overlooked) - but only from the First Cause. Observe, 1. It was the Lord that removed Israel out of his sight; whoever were the instruments, he was the author of this calamity. It was destruction from the Almighty; the Assyrian was but the rod of his anger, Isa 10:5. It was the Lord that rejected the seed of Israel, else their enemies could not have seized upon them, Kg2 17:20. Who gave Jacob for a spoil, and Israel to the robbers? Did not the Lord? Isa 43:24. We lose the benefit of national judgments if we do not eye the hand of God in them, and the fulfilling of the scripture, for that also is taken notice of here (Kg2 17:23): The Lord removed Israel out of his favour, and out of their own land, as he had said by all his servants the prophets. Rather shall heaven and earth pass than one tittle of God's word fall to the ground. When God's word and his works are compared, it will be found not only that they agree, but that they illustrate each other. But why would God ruin a people that were raised and incorporated, as Israel was, by miracles and oracles? Why would he undo that which he himself had done at so vast an expense? Was it purely an act of sovereignty? No, it was an act of necessary justice. For, 2. They provoked him to do this by their wickedness. Was it God's doing? Nay, it was their own; by their way and their doings they procured all this to themselves, and it was their own wickedness that did correct them. This the sacred historian shows here at large, that it might appear that God did them no wrong and that others might hear and fear. Come and see what it was that did all this mischief, that broke their power and laid their honour in the dust; it was sin; that, and nothing else, separated between them and God. This is here very movingly laid open as the cause of all the desolations of Israel. He here shows,

I. What God had done for Israel, to engage them to serve him. 1. He gave them their liberty (Kg2 17:7): He brought them from under the hand of Pharaoh who oppressed them, asserted their freedom (Israel is my son), and effected their freedom with a high hand. Thus they were bound in duty and gratitude to be his servants, for he had loosed their bonds; nor would he that rescued them out of the hand of the king of Egypt have contradicted himself so far as to deliver them into the hand of the king of Assyria, as he did, if they had not, by their iniquity, betrayed their liberty and sold themselves. 2. He gave them their law, and was himself their king. They were immediately under a divine regimen. They could not plead ignorance of good and evil, sin and duty, for God had particularly charged them against those very things which here he charges them with (Kg2 17:15), That they should not do like the heathen. Nor could they be in any doubt concerning their obligation to observe the laws which they are here charged with rejecting, for they were the commandments and statutes of the Lord their God (Kg2 17:13), so that no room was left to dispute whether they should keep them or no. He had not dealt so with other nations, Psa 147:19, Psa 147:20. 3. He gave them their land, for he cast out the heathen from before them (Kg2 17:8), to make room for them; and the casting out of them for their idolatries was as fair a warning as could be given to Israel not to do like them.

II. What they had done against God, notwithstanding these engagements which he had laid upon them. 1. In general. They sinned against the Lord their God (Kg2 17:7), they did those things that were not right (Kg2 17:9), but secretly. So wedded were they to their evil practices that when they could not do them publicly, could not for shame or could not for fear, they would do them secretly - an evidence of their atheism, that they thought what was done in secret was from under the eye of God himself and would not be required. Again, they wrought wicked things in such a direct contradiction to the divine law that they seemed as if they were done on purpose to provoke the Lord to anger (Kg2 17:11), in contempt of his authority and defiance of his justice. They rejected God's statutes and his covenant (Kg2 17:15), would not be bound up either by his command or the consent they themselves had given to the covenant, but threw off the obligations of both, and therefore God justly rejected them, Kg2 17:20. See Hos 4:6. They left all the commandments of the Lord their God (Kg2 17:16), left the way, left the work, which those commandments prescribed them and directed them in. Nay, lastly, they sold themselves to do evil in the sight of the Lord, that is, they wholly addicted themselves to sin, as slaves to the service of those to whom they are sold, and, by their obstinately persisting in sin, so hardened their own hearts that at length it had become morally impossible for them to recover themselves, as one that has sold himself has put his liberty past recall. 2. In particular. Though they were guilty (no doubt) of many immoralities, and violated all the commands of the second table, yet nothing is here specified, but their idolatry. This was the sin that did most easily beset them; this was, of all sins, most provoking to God: it was the spiritual adultery that broke the marriage-covenant, and was the inlet of all other wickedness. Hence it is again and again mentioned here as the sin that ruined them. (1.) They feared other gods (Kg2 17:7), that is, worshipped them and paid their homage to them, as if they feared their displeasure. (2.) They walked in the statutes of the heathen, which were contrary to God's statutes (Kg2 17:8), did as did the heathen (Kg2 17:11), went after the heathen that were round about them (Kg2 17:15), so prostituting the honour of their peculiarity, and defeating God's design concerning them, which was that they should be distinguished from the heathen. Must those that were taught of God go to school to the heathen - those that were appropriated to God take their measures from the nations that were abandoned by him? (3.) They walked in the statutes of the idolatrous kings of Israel (Kg2 17:8), in all the sins of Jeroboam, Kg2 17:22. When their kings assumed a power to alter and add to the divine institutions they submitted to them, and thought the command of their kings would bear them out in disobedience to the command of their God. (4.) They built themselves high places in all their cities, Kg2 17:9. If in any place there was but the tower of the watchmen (a country tower that had no walls, but only a tower to shelter the watch in time of danger), or but a lodge for shepherds, it must be honoured with a high place, and that with an altar. If there was a fenced city, it must be further fortified with a high place. Having forsaken God's only place, they knew no end of high places, in which every man followed his own fancy and directed his devotion to what god he pleased. Sacred things were hereby profaned and laid common, when their altars were as heaps in the furrows of the field, Hos 12:11. (5.) They set them up images and groves - Asherim (even wooden images, so some think the term, which we translate groves, should be rendered) or Ashtaroth (so others) - directed contrary to the second commandment, Kg2 17:10. They served idols (Kg2 17:12), the works of their own hands and creatures of their own fancy, though God had warned them particularly not to do this thing. (6.) They burnt incense in all the high places, to the honour of strange gods, for it was to the dishonour of the true God, Kg2 17:11. (7.) They followed vanity. Idols are called so, because they could do neither good nor evil, but were the most insignificant things that could be; those that worshipped them were like unto them, and so they became vain and good for nothing (Kg2 17:16), vain in their devotions, which were brutish and ridiculous, and so became vain in their whole conversation. (8.) Besides the molten images, even the two calves, they worshipped all the host of heaven - the sun, moon, and stars: for it is not meant of the heavenly host of angels; they could not rise so far above sensible things as to think of them. And, withal, they served Baal, the deified heroes of the Gentiles, Kg2 17:16. (9.) They caused their children to pass through the fire, in token of their dedicating them to their idols. (10.) They used divinations and enchantments, that they might receive directions from the gods to whom they paid their devotions.

III. What means God used with them, to bring them off from their idolatries, and to how little purpose. He testified against them, showed them their sins and warned them of the fatal consequences of them by all the prophets and all the seers (for so the prophets had been formerly called), and pressed them to turn from their evil ways, Kg2 17:13. We have read of prophets, more or less, in every reign. Though they had forsaken God's family of priests, he did not leave them without a succession of prophets, who made it their business to teach them the good knowledge of the Lord, but all in vain (Kg2 17:14); they would not hear, but hardened their necks, persisted in their idolatries, and were like their fathers, that would not bow their necks to God's yoke, because they did not believe in him, did not receive his truths, nor would venture upon his promises: it seems to refer to their fathers in the wilderness; the same sin that kept them out of Canaan turned these out, and that was unbelief.

IV. How God punished them for their sins. He was very angry with them (Kg2 17:18); for, in the matter of his worship, he is a jealous God, and resents nothing more deeply than giving that honour to any creature which is due to himself only. He afflicted them (Kg2 17:20) and delivered them into the hand of spoilers, in the days of the judges and of Saul, and afterwards in the days of most of their kings, to see if they would be awakened by the judgments of God to consider and amend their ways; but, when all these corrections did not prevail to drive out the folly, God first rent Israel from the house of David, under which they might have been happy. As Judah was hereby weakened, so Israel was hereby corrupted; for they made a man king who drove them from following the Lord and caused them to sin a great sin, Kg2 17:21. This was a national judgment, and the punishment of their former idolatries; and, at length, he removed them quite out of his sight (Kg2 17:18, Kg2 17:23), without giving them any hopes of a return out of their captivity.

Lastly, Here is a complaint against Judah in the midst of all (Kg2 17:19): Also Judah kept not the commandments of God; though they were not as yet quite so bad as Israel, yet they walked in the statutes of Israel; and this aggravated the sin of Israel, that they communicated the infection of it to Judah; see Eze 23:11. Those that bring sin into a country or family bring a plague into it and will have to answer for all the mischief that follows.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 7–23. Public domain.
Copy as
Ishodad of MervAD 850
BOOKS OF SESSIONS 2 KINGS 16:15
With the words “from watchtower to fortified city” [the Scripture] denounces the large number of their idols, that is, [there were] idols from border to border. The text refers to the “fortified city” as Jerusalem, but other [interpreters] say Antioch.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Kings 17:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.