Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And in the time of his distress did he trespass yet more against the LORD: this is that king Ahaz.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And in the time H6256 of his distress H6887 did he trespass H4603 yet more H3254 against the LORD H3068: this is that king H4428 Ahaz H271.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
During his time of distress this same King Achaz added to his treachery against ADONAI
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
In the time of his distress, King Ahaz became even more unfaithful to the LORD.
Ask
American Standard Version
And in the time of his distress did he trespass yet more against Jehovah, this same king Ahaz.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
In the time of his distress, he trespassed yet more against the LORD, this same king Ahaz.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And in ye time of his tribulation did he yet trespasse more against ye Lord, (this is King Ahaz)
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And in the time of his distress--he addeth to trespass against Jehovah, (this king Ahaz),
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Invasions of Judah during the Reign of Ahaz
Invasions of Judah during the Reign of Ahaz View full PDF
The Wars of Pekah
The Wars of Pekah View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 11,787 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

2 Chronicles 28:22 poignantly captures the profound spiritual rebellion of King Ahaz of Judah. Despite facing severe national distress, including devastating military defeats and invasions that served as divine discipline, Ahaz chose not to repent or seek the Lord. Instead, he deepened his sin and apostasy, illustrating a tragic spiritual trajectory where adversity, rather than leading to humility and a turning back to God, only hardened his heart further and intensified his unfaithfulness.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within the Chronicler's detailed account of King Ahaz's reign in 2 Chronicles 28. The chapter meticulously records Judah's severe military defeats at the hands of Aram and Israel, resulting in significant casualties and the taking of many captives (2 Chronicles 28:5-8). Further distress came from Edom and the Philistines, who also invaded Judah's territory (2 Chronicles 28:17-19). Rather than seeking the Lord's help or repenting, Ahaz stripped the temple and the king's house of their treasures to pay tribute to the king of Assyria (2 Chronicles 28:21), a desperate move that brought no lasting relief. Verse 22 serves as a stark, summarizing indictment of Ahaz's character, emphasizing his perverse and escalating response to these divine judgments, and setting the stage for his further descent into idolatry by sacrificing to the gods of Damascus (2 Chronicles 28:23).
  • Historical & Cultural Context: King Ahaz ruled Judah from approximately 735 to 715 BC, a period characterized by intense geopolitical instability in the Ancient Near East. Judah found itself precariously positioned between the burgeoning power of the Neo-Assyrian Empire and the Syro-Ephraimite coalition (Aram and the northern kingdom of Israel). The "distress" mentioned in the verse refers primarily to the Syro-Ephraimite War, where Aram and Israel attacked Judah with the explicit aim of deposing Ahaz and installing a puppet king (Isaiah 7:1-6). Instead of heeding the prophet Isaiah's divine call to trust solely in the Lord for deliverance (Isaiah 7:3-9), Ahaz chose to form a politically expedient but spiritually disastrous alliance with Tiglath-pileser III of Assyria, effectively making Judah a vassal state. Culturally, Ahaz's reign was marked by an unprecedented and zealous embrace of pagan practices, including the abhorrent act of child sacrifice (2 Chronicles 28:3) and the widespread adoption of foreign altars and religious customs, demonstrating a complete and defiant abandonment of the Mosaic covenant and the exclusive worship of Yahweh.
  • Key Themes: The central theme powerfully articulated in this verse is the perverse response to adversity. While hardship often serves as a divine call to repentance and a catalyst for drawing closer to God, Ahaz's suffering only drove him deeper into sin, illustrating a dangerous spiritual spiral where distress leads not to humility but to hardened rebellion. This ties into the theme of the escalation of sin, as the phrase "trespass yet more" emphasizes the progressive and compounding nature of Ahaz's apostasy. His initial unfaithfulness was intensified by his actions during crisis, demonstrating a persistent refusal to acknowledge God's sovereignty or authority. Furthermore, the verse underscores the severe consequences of idolatry and unfaithfulness, as Ahaz's distress was a direct result of his abandonment of the true God. His response to these consequences was not to turn back, but to emulate the very pagan practices that had brought him trouble, seeking help from the gods of those who defeated him (2 Chronicles 28:23), thereby compounding his spiritual peril.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Distress (Hebrew, tsârar', H6887): Derived from H6887, this primitive root means "to cramp," "to be in affliction," or "to vex." It vividly portrays the dire, constricted, and oppressive circumstances Ahaz faced, encompassing military siege, political pressure, and national anguish. In biblical thought, such intense pressure often functions as a crucible, a moment of testing and a divine invitation to seek God. For Ahaz, however, this profound "distress" did not lead to repentance but to a deeper entrenchment in his rebellion against the Lord.
  • Trespass (Hebrew, mâʻal', H4603): This primitive root means "to cover up," but is used figuratively to signify acting covertly or treacherously. It denotes an act of unfaithfulness, betrayal, or violation of trust, particularly within a religious or covenantal context. It implies a deliberate breach of duty towards God, often involving sacrilege or misappropriation of holy things. For Ahaz, his "trespass" was not merely a mistake or an oversight, but a profound, intentional act of disloyalty to YHWH, the God of Israel, representing a breaking of the sacred covenant relationship. The Chronicler frequently employs this term to describe the sins of kings and the people that directly lead to divine judgment.
  • Yet more (Hebrew, yâçaph', H3254): This primitive root means "to add" or "to augment," often used adverbially to signify continuing to do a thing. This phrase emphasizes the escalating and persistent nature of Ahaz's sin. It's not just that he committed a trespass, but that he actively "added" to his trespasses, compounding his rebellion precisely when he should have been humbled and sought divine mercy. This highlights the profound obduracy of his heart and his active choice to deepen his apostasy in the face of divine discipline and national crisis.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And in the time of his distress": This opening clause immediately sets the scene, highlighting the crucial moment of crisis in King Ahaz's reign. The "distress" refers to the severe military and political pressures Judah was under, specifically from the Syro-Ephraimite coalition, Edom, and the Philistines. This period of intense national suffering was intended by God to bring Ahaz and the people of Judah to repentance, to demonstrate their utter dependence on Him, and to turn them back from the pervasive idolatry that had gripped the kingdom.
  • "did he trespass yet more against the LORD": This is the shocking and central declaration of the verse, revealing the perverse nature of Ahaz's heart. Instead of turning to the Lord for help or repenting of the sins that brought the distress upon him, Ahaz actively increased his unfaithfulness. His response was not humility, confession, or seeking divine intervention, but a deeper plunge into idolatry, pagan practices, and reliance on foreign powers. The Chronicler views this as a direct affront and profound betrayal of the covenant relationship with Yahweh. The emphatic "yet more" underscores the deliberate, escalating, and compounding nature of his rebellion.
  • "this [is that] king Ahaz": This concluding phrase serves as a poignant, almost exasperated, and definitive summary statement. It identifies Ahaz as the epitome of a wicked king, whose character is fundamentally defined by his persistent and escalating unfaithfulness, particularly his perverse response to divine discipline. It acts as a final, damning indictment by the Chronicler, solidifying Ahaz's reputation as one of Judah's most rebellious and spiritually corrupt monarchs, a stark warning to future generations.

Literary Devices

The Chronicler employs several potent literary devices in this concise yet impactful verse to underscore Ahaz's profound spiritual failure. Irony is prominently displayed, as the expected and biblically normative response to "distress"—humility, repentance, and seeking God—is tragically inverted by Ahaz's decision to "trespass yet more." This highlights the perverse nature of his heart and his active defiance of divine discipline. The concluding phrase, "this [is that] king Ahaz," functions as a powerful form of Characterization through summary judgment, encapsulating his entire reign and moral failure in a single, definitive, and damning statement. It also carries a sense of Climax, marking the apex of Ahaz's spiritual decline, which directly precipitates his ultimate acts of idolatry described in the subsequent verses. Furthermore, the Chronicler's choice of language emphasizes the stark Contrast between God's disciplinary intent—to bring repentance—and Ahaz's hardened, rebellious response, underscoring the king's profound spiritual blindness and stubborn refusal to submit to divine authority.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This verse powerfully illustrates the human propensity for hardening the heart in the face of divine discipline. Instead of recognizing distress as a call to repentance and an opportunity to draw closer to God, Ahaz chose to double down on his sin, seeking solutions in idolatry and human alliances rather than divine faithfulness. This reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of God's character and sovereignty, demonstrating that even severe suffering does not automatically lead to spiritual growth; rather, it often exposes the true condition of the heart. The Chronicler uses Ahaz's example to warn against the dangers of persistent rebellion and the escalating nature of unfaithfulness, emphasizing that God's patience has limits and that turning away from Him in times of trouble only compounds one's spiritual peril.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The tragic account of King Ahaz serves as a profound and timeless warning for all believers across generations. When faced with the inevitable "distress" of life—whether personal hardship, professional setbacks, relational conflicts, or global crises—how do we respond? Do we, like Ahaz, allow adversity to harden our hearts, leading us to seek solace or solutions in places apart from God, perhaps even to blame Him, grow bitter, or double down on our own self-reliant strategies? Or do we, conversely, recognize these trials as divinely ordained opportunities for deeper dependence, honest introspection, and profound spiritual growth, turning to the Lord in humility, confession, and trust? Ahaz's story reminds us that true spiritual maturity is often forged in the crucible of suffering, but only if we choose to draw closer to God, confess our sins, and seek His wisdom and strength, rather than hardening our hearts and increasing our trespasses. Our response to adversity reveals the true object of our faith and the depth of our commitment to God, exposing whether we truly believe He is sovereign and good, even in the midst of our pain.

Questions for Reflection

  • What is my immediate, gut reaction when faced with significant distress or hardship? Is it to turn towards God in prayer and dependence, or away from Him in self-reliance or blame?
  • Can I identify any areas in my life where I might be "trespassing yet more" against the Lord, rather than seeking repentance and obedience, especially during difficult times?
  • How does my understanding of God's sovereignty, His loving discipline, and His ultimate faithfulness influence my response to suffering?
  • What practical steps can I take to cultivate a heart that is soft and responsive to God's discipline and guidance, rather than hardened and rebellious like Ahaz's?

FAQ

Why did Ahaz continue to trespass against the Lord despite his distress?

Answer: Ahaz's continued trespass, even in the face of severe distress, stemmed from a deeply hardened heart, a fundamental lack of faith in the God of Israel, and a profound spiritual blindness. His spiritual trajectory was one of increasing apostasy, driven by fear of human enemies and a misguided fascination with the pagan practices of surrounding nations. Instead of interpreting the distress as divine discipline intended to call him back to repentance and reliance on the covenant God, he tragically interpreted it as a sign that the gods of his enemies were stronger than Yahweh, or that he needed to appease foreign deities to gain their favor. This is explicitly stated in 2 Chronicles 28:23, where he reasoned, "Because the gods of the kings of Syria have helped them, therefore will I sacrifice to them, that they may help me." This reveals a transactional and superstitious view of deity, where he sought power and security in false gods rather than the true God who had miraculously delivered Israel throughout history. His pride and stubbornness prevented him from humbling himself before the Lord, even when his kingdom was on the brink of collapse.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

King Ahaz's tragic reign, culminating in his intensified rebellion during a period of profound distress, stands in stark and illuminating contrast to the perfect obedience and unwavering faithfulness of Jesus Christ. Ahaz's catastrophic failure to trust God in the face of suffering highlights humanity's desperate need for a King who would not falter, a High Priest who would not betray, and a Savior who would perfectly fulfill God's will. While Ahaz sought futile help from foreign kings and false gods, ultimately leading to greater bondage and destruction, Jesus, in His ultimate distress in the Garden of Gethsemane and on the cross, perfectly submitted to His Father's will (Matthew 26:39). Ahaz's "trespass yet more" underscores the depth of human sin and the inherent inability of any human king to truly deliver or lead God's people to salvation. This points forward with profound significance to Christ, the true King of Judah and the King of Kings, who came not to increase sin but to bear it, taking away the sin of the world (John 1:29). His suffering was not a consequence of His own sin, for He knew no sin (2 Corinthians 5:21), but a redemptive act on behalf of a rebellious humanity, offering the ultimate solution to the problem of sin and a perfect example of faithful endurance in distress (Hebrews 4:15). Through Christ, the cycle of human rebellion can be broken, and true repentance, forgiveness, and reconciliation with God become profoundly possible, offering eternal hope where Ahaz's story offered only despair and judgment.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Chronicles 28 verses 16–27

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Here is, I. The great distress which the kingdom of Ahaz was reduced to for his sin. In general, 1. The Lord brought Judah low, Ch2 28:19. They had lately been very high in wealth and power; but God found means to bring them down, and make them as despicable as they had been formidable. Those that will not humble themselves under the word of God will justly be humbled by his judgments. Iniquity brings men low, Psa 106:43. 2. Ahaz made Judah naked. As his sin debased them, so it exposed them. It made them naked to their shame; for it exposed them to contempt, as a man unclothed. It made them naked to their danger; for it exposed them to assaults, as a man unarmed, Exo 32:25. Sin strips men. In particular, the Edomites, to be revenged for Amaziah's cruel treatment of them (Ch2 25:12), smote Judah, and carried off many captives, Ch2 28:17. The Philistines also insulted them, took and kept possession of several cities and villages that lay near them (Ch2 28:18), and so they were revenged for the incursions which Uzziah had made upon them, Ch2 26:6. And, to show that it was purely the sin of Ahaz that brought the Philistines upon his country, in the very year that he died the prophet Isaiah foretold the destruction of the Philistines by his son, Isa 14:28, Isa 14:29.

II. The addition which Ahaz made both to the national distress and the national guilt.

1.He added to the distress, by making court to strange kings, in hopes they would relieve him. When the Edomites and Philistines were vexatious to him, he sent to the kings of Assyria to help him (Ch2 28:16); for he found his own kingdom weakened and made naked, and he could not put any confidence in God, and therefore was at a vast expense to get an interest in the king of Assyria. He pillaged the house of God, and the king's house, and squeezed the princes for money to hire these foreign forces into his service, Ch2 28:21. Though he had conformed to the idolatry of the heathen nations, his neighbours, they did not value him for that, nor love him the better, nor did his compliance, by which he lost God, gain them, nor could he make any interest in them, but with his money. It is often found that wicked men themselves have no real affection for those that revolt to them, nor do they care to do them a kindness. A degenerate branch is looked upon, on all sides, as an abominable branch, Isa 14:19. But what did Ahaz get by the king of Assyria? Why, he came to him, but he distressed him, and strengthened him not (Ch2 28:20), helped him not, Ch2 28:21. The forces of the Assyrian quartered upon his country, and so impoverished and weakened it; they grew insolent and imperious, and created him a great deal of vexation, like a broken reed, which not only fails, but pierces the hand.

2.He added to the guilt, by making court to strange gods, in hopes they would relieve him. In his distress, instead of repenting of his idolatry, which he had reason enough to see the folly of, he trespassed yet more (Ch2 28:22), was more mad than ever upon his idols. A brand of infamy is here set upon him for it: This is that king Ahaz, that wretched man, who was the scandal of the house of David and the curse and plague of his generation. Note, Those are wicked and vile indeed that are made worse by their afflictions, instead of being made better by them, who in their distress trespass yet more, have their corruptions exasperated by that which should mollify them, and their hearts more fully set in them to do evil. Let us see what his trespass was. (1.) He abused the house of God; for he cut in pieces the vessels of it, that the priests might not perform the service of the temple, or not as it should be performed, for want of vessels; and, at length, he shut up the doors, that the people might not attend it, Ch2 28:24. This was worse than the worst of the kings before him had done. (2.) He confronted the altar of God, for he made himself altars in every corner of Jerusalem; so that, as the prophet speaks, they were like heaps in the furrows of the fields, Hos 12:11. And in the cities of Judah, either by his power or by his purse, perhaps by both, he erected high places for the people to burn incense to what idols they pleased, as if on purpose to provoke the God of his fathers, Ch2 28:25. (3.) He cast off God himself; for he sacrificed to the gods of Damascus (Ch2 28:23), not because he loved them, for he thought they smote him; but because he feared them, thinking that they helped his enemies, and that, if he could bring them into his interest, they would help him. Foolish man! It was his own God that smote him and strengthened the Syrians against him, not the gods of Damascus; had he sacrificed to him, and to him only, he would have helped him. But no marvel that men's affections and devotions are misplaced when they mistake the author of their trouble and their help. And what comes of it? The gods of Syria befriend Ahaz no more than the kings of Assyria did; they were the ruin of him and of all Israel. This sin provoked God to bring judgments upon them, to cut him off in the midst of his days, when he was but thirty-six years old; and it debauched the people so that the reformation of the next reign could not prevail to cure them of their inclination to idolatry, but they retained that root of bitterness till the captivity in Babylon plucked it up.

The chapter concludes with the conclusion of the reign of Ahaz, Ch2 28:26, Ch2 28:27. For aught that appears, he died impenitent, and therefore died inglorious; for he was not buried in the sepulchres of the kings. Justly was he thought unworthy to be laid among them who was so unlike them - to be buried with kings who had used his kingly power for the destruction of the church and not for its protection or edification.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 16–27. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Chronicles 28:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.