Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Behold, the days come, that I will cut off thine arm, and the arm of thy father's house, that there shall not be an old man in thine house.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Behold, the days H3117 come H935, that I will cut off H1438 thine arm H2220, and the arm H2220 of thy father's H1 house H1004, that there shall not be an old man H2205 in thine house H1004.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The day is coming when I will break your strength and the strength of your father's family, so that no one in your family will live to old age.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Behold, the days are coming when I will cut off your strength and the strength of your father’s house, so that no older man will be left in your house.
Ask
American Standard Version
Behold, the days come, that I will cut off thine arm, and the arm of thy father’s house, that there shall not be an old man in thy house.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Behold, the days come, that I will cut off your arm, and the arm of your father’s house, that there shall not be an old man in your house.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Beholde, the dayes come, that I will cut off thine arme, and the arme of thy fathers house, that there shall not be an olde man in thine house.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`Lo, days are coming, and I have cut off thine arm, and the arm of the house of thy father, that an old man is not in thy house;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 7,272 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

This verse delivers a severe divine judgment against Eli, the High Priest, and his priestly lineage, prophesying the complete removal of their strength, authority, and prominence, symbolized by the cutting off of their "arm." It further foretells a curse of premature death, ensuring that no male descendant of Eli's house will reach old age. This pronouncement is a direct consequence of Eli's failure to honor God above his wicked sons, Hophni and Phinehas, who desecrated the priestly office and the Lord's sacrifices, bringing contempt upon the divine covenant.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Samuel 2:31 is an integral part of a powerful prophetic oracle delivered to Eli by an unnamed "man of God" (a prophet) found in 1 Samuel 2:27-36. This divine pronouncement immediately follows the detailed account of the profound wickedness of Eli's sons, Hophni and Phinehas, who "knew not the Lord" and exploited their priestly duties, treating the Lord's offerings with contempt (1 Samuel 2:12-17). Eli, despite hearing reports of their egregious behavior and even offering a mild rebuke, failed to take decisive action to restrain them, effectively honoring his sons more than God (1 Samuel 2:22-29). The preceding verse, 1 Samuel 2:30, establishes the theological premise for the judgment: "for them that honour me I will honour, and they that despise me shall be lightly esteemed." Thus, verse 31 articulates the specific, devastating consequences of Eli's and his sons' profound disrespect for the Lord and His sacred institutions.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: At this historical juncture, Israel was in a period of significant spiritual decline under the judgeship of Eli, who also served as High Priest at Shiloh, the central sanctuary where the Ark of the Covenant resided. The priesthood was a hereditary office, traditionally passing through the line of Aaron. Eli's lineage is generally traced through Ithamar, Aaron's younger son, which might indicate a less prominent branch of the priestly family. The cultural expectation was for priests to be exemplary in their devotion and conduct, mediating between God and Israel. The flagrant abuse of the sacrificial system by Hophni and Phinehas—demanding raw meat before the fat was burned and engaging in sexual immorality at the tabernacle entrance—was a profound affront to God's holiness and the covenant, undermining the very foundation of Israelite worship. The concept of "old age" was highly valued in ancient Israel, symbolizing wisdom, blessing, and God's favor, making the curse of "no old man" a particularly severe and humiliating judgment, signifying a loss of honor, legacy, and divine blessing.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in 1 Samuel and the broader Old Testament narrative. It highlights the theme of Divine Judgment and Accountability, demonstrating God's unwavering righteousness in punishing sin, especially among those entrusted with sacred leadership. The narrative underscores the Consequences of Disobedience and Spiritual Negligence, showing how personal and familial failures, particularly in positions of authority, can lead to severe, even generational, repercussions. Furthermore, it introduces the theme of God's Sovereignty in Raising and Removing Leaders, foreshadowing the transition from a corrupt priestly line to a faithful one (represented by Zadok's lineage) and, ultimately, from a disobedient kingship (Saul) to a righteous one (David). The stark contrast between Eli's declining house and the emerging figure of Samuel, who "grew in stature and in favor with the Lord and with people" (1 Samuel 2:26), emphasizes God's commitment to raising up those who truly honor Him and faithfully execute His will.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Arm (Hebrew, zᵉrôwaʻ, H2220): This word literally refers to the physical limb, but in the Old Testament, it is frequently used metaphorically to denote strength, power, dominion, or the ability to act decisively. To "cut off the arm" (or arms, as it is pluralized for Eli's house) signifies a complete removal of power, authority, and the capacity to function effectively in their priestly role. It is an image of divine incapacitation, rendering them powerless and without influence.
  • Cut off (Hebrew, gâdaʻ, H1438): A primitive root meaning "to fell a tree" or, more generally, "to destroy anything." This verb implies a decisive, violent, and permanent severance. While "cutting a covenant" implies establishing it, here, "cutting off" signifies the termination or breaking of a relationship or lineage. It conveys the finality and severity of God's judgment, indicating an irreversible end to their priestly prominence and authority.
  • House (Hebrew, bayith, H1004): This word primarily means "a house" or dwelling, but it carries a much broader range of applications, especially referring to a family, household, or lineage. In this context, "thine house" refers not merely to Eli's physical dwelling but to his entire family, his descendants, and the continuity of his priestly line. The judgment thus extends beyond Eli himself to encompass the future of his entire ancestral line, particularly concerning their role in the priesthood.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Behold, the days come": This phrase serves as a solemn prophetic announcement, emphasizing the certainty and imminence of the coming judgment. It signals a divine decree that will inevitably unfold in history, highlighting God's sovereign control over time and events. It demands attention from the hearer, indicating a significant and unavoidable future event.
  • "that I will cut off thine arm, and the arm of thy father's house": This constitutes the core of the divine judgment. "Thine arm" refers to Eli's personal strength, authority, and ability to lead and act, while "the arm of thy father's house" extends the judgment to his entire priestly lineage and all his descendants. The repetition and pluralization of "arm" emphasize the comprehensive and pervasive nature of the removal of their power and influence, signifying the end of their prominence and effective functioning in the priesthood.
  • "that there shall not be an old man in thine house": This declaration foretells a dire curse of premature death and the failure of Eli's male descendants to reach old age. In ancient Israel, old age was a highly esteemed sign of blessing, wisdom, and God's favor, often associated with a long and prosperous life. To be denied old age meant a shortened, often inglorious, life, and the eventual diminishment or extinction of the family line, preventing them from holding positions of respect and authority typically associated with elders and leaders.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several potent literary devices to convey the severity and certainty of the divine judgment. Metaphor is central, with "cutting off thine arm" vividly representing the removal of strength, power, and authority from Eli and his lineage. This concrete image makes the abstract concept of divine judgment tangible and impactful, symbolizing incapacitation and the stripping of influence. The phrase "that there shall not be an old man in thine house" functions as Hyperbole or Merism, emphasizing the extreme and pervasive nature of the curse; it indicates that premature death will be so common that no one will reach a venerable age, effectively ensuring the decline and eventual end of their line's influence and prominence. The entire pronouncement serves as a Prophecy, a direct divine utterance foretelling future events, underscoring God's omniscience and sovereign control over history. The Repetition of "arm" (singular then plural) further stresses the comprehensive scope of the judgment, affecting both Eli personally and his entire household, reinforcing the totality of their downfall.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This prophecy underscores God's absolute holiness and His unyielding demand for reverence, especially from those who serve Him in sacred capacities. Eli's failure to honor God above his sons, allowing their sacrilege to persist and even benefit from it, constituted a profound violation of divine order and a direct affront to God's character. The judgment demonstrates that God is not mocked and that privilege, even a sacred one, does not exempt one from accountability. It highlights the fundamental principle articulated in 1 Samuel 2:30 that true honor belongs to God alone, and those who despise Him, whether through active rebellion or passive neglect, will inevitably be brought low. This passage serves as a stark warning about the serious consequences of spiritual compromise and the imperative for leaders, particularly spiritual ones, to uphold righteousness without fear or favor, for their choices have profound implications for generations.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

1 Samuel 2:31 offers profound and enduring lessons for believers today, particularly concerning the weighty responsibility of leadership and the absolute imperative of prioritizing God above all else. For those in positions of spiritual authority—whether pastors, elders, parents, or teachers—the passage serves as a sobering reminder of the immense responsibility to uphold God's standards and to actively confront sin, even when it is personally difficult or involves loved ones. Eli's passive approach, driven by a misplaced affection or fear, led to devastating consequences for his entire family and the spiritual health of the nation. This calls us to a deep examination of our own lives: Are we truly honoring God with our actions, our words, and our priorities, or do we allow comfort, fear of man, or familial ties to compromise our unwavering commitment to divine truth and righteousness? The verse also reminds us that God's word is true and His judgments are certain, encouraging us to live in reverent obedience, knowing that our choices have far-reaching implications, not only for ourselves but potentially for future generations, impacting the spiritual legacy we leave behind.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific areas of my life might I be inadvertently honoring something or someone more than God, perhaps through passive neglect or compromise?
  • What responsibilities do I hold, whether in my family, church, or community, where I might be tempted to compromise God's standards for personal comfort, approval, or convenience?
  • How does the certainty of God's righteous judgment motivate me to pursue a life of greater integrity, active obedience, and unwavering devotion to Him?

FAQ

What does "cut off thine arm" specifically mean in this context?

Answer: "Cutting off thine arm" is a powerful and vivid metaphor signifying the complete removal of strength, power, and authority. In the context of Eli and his priestly house, it means they would lose their prominent position, their influence, and their ability to effectively function as priests and leaders within Israel. It foreshadows the end of their high priestly line and their diminished role in Israel's spiritual leadership. This was dramatically fulfilled when King Solomon removed Abiathar, Eli's descendant, from the priesthood, thereby "cutting off" their arm of authority and fulfilling the prophecy (1 Kings 2:27).

How was the prophecy "there shall not be an old man in thine house" fulfilled?

Answer: This part of the prophecy was fulfilled through a series of tragic events that led to the premature deaths of many of Eli's male descendants. Eli's two sons, Hophni and Phinehas, died on the same day in battle, as prophesied (1 Samuel 4:11). Later, during Saul's reign, the majority of Eli's priestly descendants at Nob, including Ahimelech, were brutally slaughtered by Doeg the Edomite at Saul's command (1 Samuel 22:18-19). While Abiathar, a descendant of Eli, escaped this massacre, he was later deposed by King Solomon, effectively ending the high priestly line of Eli and ensuring that no male descendant from his house would reach old age in a position of power, prominence, or sacred service (1 Kings 2:27).

Why was Eli's punishment so severe?

Answer: Eli's punishment was severe because he, as the High Priest, failed to honor God above his own sons and allowed them to profoundly profane the sacred office and the offerings of the Lord. 1 Samuel 2:29 explicitly states God's indictment: "Why kick ye at my sacrifice and at mine offering... and honourest thy sons above me?" This was not merely a parental failing but a profound spiritual dereliction of duty that directly undermined the very worship of God in Israel, bringing contempt upon His name and His covenant. God's judgment emphasizes His absolute holiness, His demand for reverence, and the serious accountability of those entrusted with spiritual leadership, particularly when their actions or inactions bring dishonor upon His name and sacred institutions.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Samuel 2:31 details a severe judgment against a corrupt priestly line, it ultimately points to the profound and enduring need for a perfect High Priest who would truly honor God without blemish or failure. The inherent limitations and eventual failure of Eli's house, and indeed the entire Levitical priesthood, to maintain holiness and faithfully mediate between God and humanity highlights the temporary and insufficient nature of the Old Covenant system. This pervasive brokenness foreshadows the coming of Jesus Christ, the ultimate and eternal High Priest, who is "holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens" (Hebrews 7:26). Unlike Eli's sons who offered defiled sacrifices and profaned God's name, Jesus offered himself as the spotless and blameless Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, a "single sacrifice for sins forever" (Hebrews 10:12). His priesthood is "not on the basis of a legal requirement concerning bodily descent, but by the power of an indestructible life" (Hebrews 7:16), ensuring that His "arm" of power and authority will never be cut off or diminished. Through Christ, believers are brought into a new and superior covenant, where access to God is not dependent on a fallible human priesthood but on the perfect, eternal intercession of Jesus, who always lives to make intercession for them (Hebrews 7:25), securing their salvation and standing before God forever.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Samuel 2 verses 27–36

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Eli reproved his sons too gently, and did not threaten them as he should, and therefore God sent a prophet to him to reprove him sharply, and to threaten him, because, by his indulgence of them, he had strengthened their hands in their wickedness. If good men be wanting in their duty, and by their carelessness and remissness contribute any thing to the sin of sinners, they must expect both to hear of it and to smart for it. Eli's family was now nearer to God than all the families of the earth, and therefore he will punish them, Amo 3:2. The message is sent to Eli himself, because God would bring him to repentance and save him; not to his sons, whom he had determined to destroy. And it might have been a means of awakening him to do his duty at last, and so to have prevented the judgment, but we do not find it had any great effect upon him. The message this prophet delivers from God is very close.

I. He reminds him of the great things God had done for the house of his fathers and for his family. He appeared to Aaron in Egypt (Exo 4:27), in the house of bondage, as a token of further favour which he designed for him, Sa1 2:27. He advanced him to the priesthood, entailed it upon his family, and thereby dignified it above any of the families of Israel. He entrusted him with honourable work, to offer on God's altar, to burn incense, and to wear that ephod in which was the breast-plate of judgment. He settled upon him an honourable maintenance, a share out of all the offerings made by fire, Sa1 2:28. What could he have done more for them, to engage them to be faithful to him? Note, The distinguishing favours we have received from God, especially those of the spiritual priesthood, are great aggravations of sin, and will be remembered against us in the day of account, if we profane our crown and betray our trusts, Deu 32:6; Sa2 12:7, Sa2 12:8.

II. He exhibits a high charge against him and his family. His children did wickedly, and he connived at it, and thereby involved himself in the guilt; the indictment therefore runs against them all, Sa1 2:29. 1. His sons had impiously profaned the holy things of God: "You kick at my sacrifice which I have commanded; not only trample upon the institution as a mean thing, but spurn at it as a thing you hate to be tied up to." They did the utmost despite imaginable to the offerings of the Lord when they committed all that outrage and rapine about them that we read of, and violently plundered the pots on which, in effect, Holiness to the Lord was written (Zac 14:20), and took that fat to themselves which God had appointed to be burnt on his altar. 2. Eli had bolstered them up in it, by not punishing their insolence and impiety: "Thou for thy part honourest thy sons above me," that is, "thou hadst rather see my offerings disgraced by their profanation of them than see thy sons disgraced by a legal censure upon them for so doing, which ought to have been inflicted, even to suspension and deprivation ab officio et beneficio - of their office and its emoluments." Those that allow and countenance their children in any evil way, and do not use their authority to restrain and punish them, do in effect honour them more than God, being more tender of their reputation than of his glory and more desirous to humour them than to honour him. 3. They had all shared in the gains of the sacrilege. It is to be feared that Eli himself, though he disliked and reproved the abuses they committed, yet did not forbear to eat of the roast meat they sacrilegiously got, Sa1 2:15. He was a fat heavy man (Sa1 4:18), and therefore it is charged upon the whole family (though Hophni and Phinehas were principally guilty), You make yourselves fat with the chief of all the offerings. God gave them sufficient to feed them, but that would not suffice; they made themselves fat, and served their lusts with that which God was to be served with. See Hos 4:8.

III. He declares the cutting off of the entail of the high priesthood from his family (Sa1 2:30): "The Lord God of Israel, who is jealous for his own honour and Israel's, says, and lets thee know it, that thy commission is revoked and superseded." I said, indeed, that thy house, and the house of thy father Ithamar (for from that younger son of Aaron Eli descended), should walk before me for ever. Upon what occasion the dignity of the high priesthood was transferred from the family of Eleazar to that of Ithamar does not appear; but it seems this had been done, and Eli stood fair to have that honour perpetuated to his posterity. But observe, the promise carried its own condition along with it: They shall walk before me forever, that is, "they shall have the honour, provided they faithfully do the service." Walking before God is the great condition of the covenant, Gen 17:1. Let them set me before their face, and I will set them before my face continually (Psa 41:12), otherwise not. But now the Lord says, Be it far from me. "Now that you cast me off you can expect no other than that I should cast you off; you will not walk before me as you should, and therefore you shall not." Such wicked and abusive servants God will discard, and turn out of his service. Some think there is a further reach in this recall of the grant, and that it was not only to be fulfilled shortly in the deposing of the posterity of Eli, when Zadok, who descended from Eleazar, was put in Abiathar's room, but it was to have its complete accomplishment at length in the total abolition of the Levitical priesthood by the priesthood of Christ.

IV. He gives a good reason for this revocation, taken from a settled and standing rule of God's government, according to which all must expect to be dealt with (like that by which Cain was tried, Gen 4:7): Those that honour me I will honour, and those that despise me shall be lightly esteemed.

1.Observe in general, (1.) That God is the fountain of honour and dishonour; he can exalt the meanest and put contempt upon the greatest. (2.) As we deal with God we must expect to be dealt with by him, and yet more favourably than we deserve. See Psa 18:25, Psa 18:26.

2.Particularly, (1.) Be it spoken, to the everlasting reputation of religion or of serious godliness, that it gives honour to God and puts honour upon men. By it we seek and serve the glory of God, and he will be behind-hand with none that do so, but here and hereafter will secure their glory. The way to be truly great is to be truly good. If we humble and deny ourselves in any thing to honour God, and have a single eye to him in it, we may depend upon this promise, he will put the best honour upon us. See Joh 12:26. (2.) Be it spoken, to the everlasting reproach of impiety or profaneness, that this does dishonour to God (despises the greatest and best of beings, whom angels adore) and will bring dishonour upon men, for those that do so shall be lightly esteemed; not only God will lightly esteem them (that perhaps they will not regard, as those that honour him value his honour, of whom therefore it is said, I will honour them), but they shall be lightly esteemed by all the world; the very honour they are proud of shall be laid in the dust; they shall see themselves despised by all mankind, their names a reproach; when they are gone, their memory shall rot, and, when they rise again, it shall be to everlasting shame and contempt. The dishonour which their impotent malice puts upon God and his omnipotent justice will return upon their own heads, Psa 79:12.

V. He foretels the particular judgments which should come upon his family, to its perpetual ignominy. A curse should be entailed upon his posterity, and a terrible curse it is, and shows how jealous God is in the matters of his worship and how ill he takes it when those who are bound by their character and profession to preserve and advance the interests of his glory are false to their trust, and betray them. If God's ministers be vicious and profane, of how much sorer punishment will they be thought worthy, here and for ever, than other sinners! Let such read the doom here passed on Eli's house, and tremble. It is threatened,

1.That their power should be broken (Sa1 2:31): I will cut off thy arm, and the arm of thy father's house. They should be stripped of all their authority, should be deposed, and have no influence upon the people as they had had. God would make them contemptible and base. See Mal 2:8, Mal 2:9. The sons had abused their power to oppress the people and encroach upon their rights, and the father had not used his power, as he ought to have done, to restrain and punish them, and therefore it was justly threatened that the arm should be cut off which was not stretched out as it should have been.

2.That their lives should be shortened. He was himself an old man; but instead of using the wisdom, gravity, experience, and authority of his age, for the service of God and the support of religion, he had suffered the infirmities of age to make him more cool and remiss in his duty, and therefore it is here threatened that none of his posterity should live to be old, Sa1 2:31, Sa1 2:32. It is twice spoken: "There shall not be an old man in thy house for ever;" and again (Sa1 2:33), "All the increase of thy house, from generation to generation, shall die in the flower of their age, when they are in the midst of the years of their service," so that though the family should not be extinct, yet it should never be considerable, nor should any member of it come to be eminent in his day. Bishop Patrick relates, out of some of the Jewish writers, that long after this, there being a family in Jerusalem none of which commonly lived above eighteen years, upon search it was found that they descended from the house of Eli, on which this sentence was passed.

3.That all their comforts should be embittered. (1.) The comfort they had in the sanctuary, in its wealth and prosperity: Thou shalt see an enemy in my habitation. This was fulfilled in the Philistines' invasions and the mischiefs they did to Israel, by which the country was impoverished (Sa1 13:19), and no doubt the priests' incomes were thereby very much impaired. The captivity of the ark was such an act of hostility committed upon God's habitation as broke Eli's heart. As it is a blessing to a family to see peace upon Israel (Psa 128:5, Psa 128:6), so the contrary is a sore judgment upon a family, especially a family of priests. (2.) The comfort of their children: "The man of thine whom I shall not cut off by an untimely death shall live to be a blot and burden to the family, a scandal and vexation to his relations; he shall be to consume thy eyes and grieve thy heart, for his foolishness or his sickliness, his wickedness or his poverty." Grief for a dead child is great, but for a bad child often greater.

4.That their substance should be wasted and they should be reduced to extreme poverty (Sa1 2:36): "He that is left alive in thy house shall have little joy of his life, for want of a livelihood; he shall come and crouch to the succeeding family for a subsistence." (1.) He shall beg for the smallest alms - a piece of silver (and the word signifies the least piece) and a morsel of bread. See how this answered the sin. Eli's sons must have the best pieces of flesh, but their sons will be glad of a morsel of bread. Note, Want is the just punishment of wantonness. Those who could not be content without dainties and varieties are brought, they or theirs, to want necessaries, and the Lord is righteous in thus visiting them. (2.) He shall beg for the meanest office: Put me into somewhat belonging to the priesthood (as it is in the original); make me as one of the hired servants, the fittest place for a prodigal. Plenty and power are forfeited when they are abused. They should not be able to pretend to any good preferment, not to any place at the altar, but should petition for some poor employment, be the work ever so hard and the wages ever so small, so they might but get bread. This, it is probable, was fully accomplished when Abiathar, who was of Eli's race, was deposed by Solomon for treason, and he and his turned out of office in the temple (Kg1 2:26, Kg1 2:27), by which it is easy to think his posterity were reduced to the extremities here described.

5.That God would shortly begin to execute these judgments in the death of Hophni and Phinehas, the sad tidings of which Eli himself should live to hear: This shall be a sign to thee, Sa1 2:34. When thou hearest it, say, "Now the word of God begins to operate; here is one threatening fulfilled, from which I infer that all the rest will be fulfilled in their order." Hophni and Phinehas had many a time sinned together, and it is here foretold that they should die together both in one day. Bind these tares in a bundle for the fire. This was fulfilled, Sa1 4:11.

VI. In the midst of all these threatenings against the house of Eli, here is mercy promised to Israel (v. 35): I will raise me up a faithful priest. 1. This was fulfilled in Zadoc, of the family of Eleazar, who came into Abiathar's place in the beginning of Solomon's reign, and was faithful to his trust; and the high priests were of his posterity as long as the Levitical priesthood continued. Note, The wickedness of ministers, though it destroy themselves, yet it shall not destroy the ministry. How bad soever the officers are, the office shall continue always to the end of the world. If some betray their trust, yet others shall be raised up that will be true to it. God's work shall never fall to the ground for want of hands to carry it on. The high priest is here said to walk before God's anointed (that is, David and his seed) because he wore the breast-plate of judgment, which he was to consult, not in common cases, but for the king, in the affairs of state. Note, Notwithstanding the degeneracy we see and lament in many families, God will secure to himself a succession. If some grow worse than their ancestors, others, to balance that, shall grow better. 2. It has its full accomplishment in the priesthood of Christ, that merciful and faithful high priest whom God raised up when the Levitical priesthood was thrown off, who in all things did his father's mind, and for whom God will build a sure house, build it on a rock, so that the gates of hell cannot prevail against it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 27–36. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
HOMILIES ON GENESIS 59.20
Hence I beg you to offer a hand to our children lest we ourselves become liable for what is committed by them. Are you not aware of what happened to old Eli for not properly correcting his sons’ shortcomings? I mean, when a disease requires surgery, it rapidly becomes incurable if the physician is bent on treating it with skin ointments and does not apply the appropriate remedy. In just the same way it behooved that old man to take appropriate action regarding his sons’ failing, but by being guilty of excessive tolerance he too shared in their punishment.
BedeAD 735
Commentary on Samuel
Behold, the days are coming, and I will cut off your arm, etc. These days are present, no priest is now chosen from the stock of Aaron; but the boast of the legal priesthood has been cut off, not only in Eli alone, but in the entire succession of the Levitical lineage; so much so that not even a priest of the lesser order, who are called presbyters in Greek, that is, elders, is considered to be sought there. Whence the Septuagint interpreters have more clearly translated: And there shall not be an elder in my house for you, because indeed many from that tribe age in body, but in the house of the Lord they are not endowed with the rank of presbyters.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 2:31 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.