Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Ephah, Caleb's concubine, bare Haran, and Moza, and Gazez: and Haran begat Gazez.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Ephah H5891, Caleb's H3612 concubine H6370, bare H3205 Haran H2771, and Moza H4162, and Gazez H1495: and Haran H2771 begat H3205 Gazez H1495.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
'Eifah, Kalev's concubine, bore Haran, Motza and Gazez; and Haran fathered Gazez.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Caleb’s concubine Ephah was the mother of Haran, Moza, and Gazez. Haran was the father of Gazez.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Ephah, Caleb’s concubine, bare Haran, and Moza, and Gazez; and Haran begat Gazez.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Ephah, Caleb’s concubine, bore Haran, and Moza, and Gazez; and Haran became the father of Gazez.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Ephah a concubine of Caleb bare Haran and Moza, and Gazez: Haran also begate Gazez.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Ephah concubine of Caleb bare Haran, and Moza, and Gazez; and Haran begat Gazez.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,353 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 2:46 meticulously records a specific segment within the extensive genealogies of the tribe of Judah, focusing on the descendants of Caleb, son of Hezron. It identifies Ephah as Caleb's concubine and lists her three sons: Haran, Moza, and Gazez. The subsequent clarification, "and Haran begat Gazez," is crucial, precisely delineating the lineage by indicating that this second Gazez is not a direct son of Ephah but rather a grandson through Haran, thereby affirming the direct line of descent from Ephah and Caleb through Haran. This seemingly simple entry contributes to the Chronicler's comprehensive and theologically significant record of God's covenant people.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within the opening chapters of 1 Chronicles (chapters 1-9), which are almost entirely dedicated to comprehensive genealogical lists. These lists serve as a foundational historical and theological record for post-exilic Israel, re-establishing tribal identity, land inheritance rights, and, most significantly, tracing the lineage that would culminate in King David and ultimately the Messiah. Specifically, 1 Chronicles 2 focuses on the descendants of Judah, the royal tribe, from whom the Davidic line would emerge. Verse 46 follows earlier mentions of Caleb's other wives and children, such as Azubah and Jerioth in 1 Chronicles 2:18, demonstrating the chronicler's intent to provide a complete and accurate accounting of Caleb's extensive progeny, ensuring no legitimate line of descent was omitted.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israelite society, concubines (Hebrew: pîylegesh) were recognized as secondary wives, a common practice in the patriarchal period and throughout the Old Testament. While their status might have differed from primary wives, their children were fully legitimate and held recognized rights to inheritance, though sometimes distinct from those of the primary wife's offspring. Caleb himself was a towering figure in Israel's history, renowned for his unwavering faith and courage during the wilderness wanderings and the conquest of Canaan, as highlighted in Numbers 13:30. The meticulous recording of all his descendants, including those from concubines, underscores the importance of preserving the tribal integrity, ensuring proper land distribution, and affirming the fulfillment of God's promises related to land and lineage within the covenant community.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of this verse within the broader genealogical framework highlights several key themes central to the Chronicler's purpose. Firstly, it emphasizes Meticulous Record-Keeping, demonstrating the Chronicler's commitment to preserving a precise and exhaustive account of Israel's lineage, leaving no legitimate descendant unmentioned. This precision was vital for tribal identity and legal claims in the post-exilic period. Secondly, it illustrates the Inclusion of All Legitimate Descendants within the tribal structure, affirming that children born to concubines were fully integrated into the family and tribal identity, reflecting the societal norms and legal recognition of such relationships. Finally, the specific clarification "Haran begat Gazez" underscores the theme of Clarity of Lineage, ensuring that the reader understands the exact familial relationships and the precise flow of descent, which was crucial for establishing inheritance rights and validating tribal claims within the context of the broader genealogies of 1 Chronicles 1-9.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Ephah (Hebrew, ʻÊyphâh, H5891): This is the proper noun identifying Caleb's concubine. While the name itself might be associated with "darkness" or "gloom" in other contexts, here it functions solely as a personal name. Her inclusion in this genealogy, despite her status as a concubine, highlights the comprehensive nature of biblical records, which sought to document all legitimate lines of descent for tribal, historical, and theological purposes, ensuring the complete picture of God's people.
  • Concubine (Hebrew, pîylegesh, H6370): This term refers to a secondary wife, distinct from a primary wife but with a recognized status within the household and family structure. Unlike a mere mistress, a concubine's children were considered legitimate heirs, part of the family and tribe, and eligible for inheritance, though sometimes with different rights or portions than those of the primary wife's children. This practice was common in the ancient Near East and is attested throughout the Old Testament, such as in the cases of Reumah, Nahor's concubine (Genesis 22:24), and Timna, Eliphaz's concubine (Genesis 36:12).
  • Begat (Hebrew, yâlad, H3205): This primitive root verb is fundamental to biblical genealogies, signifying direct lineal descent, whether "to bear young" (for females) or "to beget" (for males). Its repetition in "Haran begat Gazez" is vital for clarifying the exact relationship. In Hebrew genealogical lists, it was not uncommon for a grandson to be listed immediately after a grandfather, or for lines to be condensed for brevity. The explicit "Haran begat Gazez" resolves any potential ambiguity, clearly stating that this Gazez is Haran's son, and therefore Caleb's grandson, rather than another direct son of Ephah.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Ephah, Caleb's concubine, bare Haran, and Moza, and Gazez:" This opening clause introduces Ephah, identifying her marital status as a concubine of Caleb, a prominent and faithful figure from the tribe of Judah. It then lists her direct offspring: Haran, Moza, and Gazez. This establishes the initial generation of children born to Ephah, all of whom are recognized as legitimate descendants of Caleb. The inclusion of these names, otherwise largely unknown outside this specific genealogical context, underscores the meticulous detail with which the Chronicler preserved the tribal records, ensuring a comprehensive account of Caleb's lineage.
  • "and Haran begat Gazez." This second clause provides a crucial clarification that prevents misinterpretation. Without it, a reader might assume that the second mention of "Gazez" is either a mere repetition or another direct son of Ephah. By explicitly stating that "Haran begat Gazez," the text clarifies that this particular Gazez is the son of Haran, who was Ephah's son. This makes the second Gazez a grandson of Ephah (and Caleb), ensuring precision in the lineage. This construction is a common, though sometimes initially confusing, feature of ancient genealogies, where later generations might be listed in close proximity to earlier ones for the sake of completeness and clarity of descent.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 2:46, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of 1 Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a dry list of names but a structured literary form designed to establish identity, inheritance rights, and historical and theological continuity for the post-exilic community. The Chronicler employs Conciseness, typical of such lists, presenting a significant amount of information in a compact and efficient manner. Furthermore, the verse utilizes Repetition with Clarification through the dual mention of "Gazez" followed by the explicit statement "Haran begat Gazez." This specific construction serves to prevent ambiguity, ensuring the reader correctly understands the generational relationship and the precise flow of descent within Caleb's extended family. This reflects the Chronicler's careful attention to detail and accuracy in preserving the sacred history of Israel.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

While seemingly a simple list of names, 1 Chronicles 2:46 carries profound theological weight by contributing to the overarching narrative of God's faithfulness in preserving His covenant people and their lineage. The meticulous recording of every legitimate descendant, including those from concubines, underscores God's comprehensive attention to detail in His divine plan. It highlights that no individual or family line, however seemingly minor or socially complex, is overlooked in the grand tapestry of salvation history. These genealogies served as the bedrock for understanding tribal identity, land distribution, and, most importantly, the preservation of the messianic line, affirming God's unwavering commitment to His promises, even through the intricate and sometimes challenging realities of human family structures.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

At first glance, a verse like 1 Chronicles 2:46 might appear to be merely an obscure historical record, far removed from daily life and spiritual relevance. However, its inclusion in the inspired Word of God invites us to consider its deeper significance. It reminds us that God is a God of meticulous detail, who cares about the individual lives and family histories of His people, past, present, and future. Every name, every relationship, every lineage, no matter how seemingly insignificant or complex to us, is part of His grand design. This verse subtly teaches us the profound value of every person within God's economy, regardless of their societal status or the circumstances of their birth. Just as God meticulously preserved these ancient lines for His overarching purposes, He orchestrates our lives and places us within His unfolding story. It encourages us to trust that even in the seemingly mundane, complex, or overlooked aspects of our own lives, God is intimately at work, weaving together a narrative that ultimately points to His glory, His faithfulness, and His sovereign plan for all humanity.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detail of biblical genealogies, even in seemingly minor verses like this, speak to God's character and His intimate involvement in human history?
  • What can we learn about God's view of every individual, regardless of their social standing (e.g., concubine's children), from their inclusion in these sacred records?
  • In what ways does understanding the purpose of these ancient genealogies (e.g., preserving tribal identity, land rights, and the messianic line) deepen your appreciation for God's long-term faithfulness?

FAQ

Why are concubines and their children included in biblical genealogies?

Answer: Concubines were recognized secondary wives in ancient Israelite society, and their children were considered legitimate members of the family and tribe. Their inclusion in biblical genealogies, such as Ephah's children in 1 Chronicles 2:46, was crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it ensured a comprehensive and accurate record of all legitimate descendants, which was vital for establishing tribal identity, land inheritance rights, and maintaining the integrity of family lines. Secondly, it reflects the social and legal realities of the time, where children born to concubines held recognized status and rights, distinguishing them from illegitimate offspring. This meticulous record-keeping underscores the Chronicler's commitment to completeness in preserving the history of God's covenant people.

What is the significance of the repetition "Haran begat Gazez" in this verse?

Answer: The repetition "Haran begat Gazez" is a crucial clarification within the genealogical record. In ancient Hebrew genealogies, it was common for lists to sometimes condense generations or for a grandson to be listed immediately after a grandfather, potentially causing confusion. By explicitly stating "Haran begat Gazez," the text clarifies that the second "Gazez" mentioned is not another direct son of Ephah, but rather the son of Haran (who was Ephah's son). This means Gazez is Caleb's grandson through Haran. This precision ensures that the lineage is accurately understood, preventing ambiguity and maintaining the integrity of the family tree for tribal and inheritance purposes, much like the precise records found in Genesis 5.

How do these seemingly "dry" genealogical lists contribute to the overall message of the Bible?

Answer: While genealogical lists like 1 Chronicles 2:46 might seem dry, they are foundational to the Bible's overarching message of God's faithfulness and His redemptive plan. They serve multiple vital purposes: they establish tribal identity and land claims for the Israelites; they demonstrate God's meticulous attention to detail in preserving His people; and most importantly, they meticulously trace the lineage through which God's covenant promises would be fulfilled, especially the promise of a Messiah. These detailed records provide the historical bedrock for the coming of Jesus Christ, ensuring that He was indeed born into the prophesied line of David and Abraham, as affirmed in Matthew 1:1 and Luke 3:23-38. They affirm God's unwavering commitment to His long-term purposes across generations.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Though 1 Chronicles 2:46 appears as a small detail within a lengthy genealogy, its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment lies in its contribution to the grand narrative of God's unwavering commitment to preserve a chosen lineage through which His redemptive plan would unfold. Every name, every connection, however obscure, serves as a thread in the tapestry leading to the promised "seed" who would crush the serpent's head (Genesis 3:15). The meticulous recording of Caleb's descendants, including those through a concubine, underscores God's sovereign hand working through the complexities of human family structures to ensure the continuity of His people. This precision foreshadows the certainty of Christ's coming, demonstrating that His lineage was not left to chance but was divinely orchestrated, fulfilling the prophecies of His birth into the tribe of Judah and the house of David (Matthew 1:1-17). The inclusion of all legitimate descendants, regardless of their mother's status, subtly prefigures Christ's radical inclusion, as He came not just for the "primary" or "privileged" but for all humanity, breaking down barriers and welcoming all who believe into His family through faith (Galatians 3:28). Thus, even in these ancient lists, we glimpse the foundational work of God preparing the way for the ultimate Son, Jesus Christ, who perfectly fulfills every promise and brings all of God's people into His eternal family, making them co-heirs with Him (Romans 8:17).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 2 verses 18–55

The persons mentioned in the former paragraph are most of them such as we read of, and most of them such as we read much of, in other scriptures; but very few of those to whom this paragraph relates are mentioned any where else. It should seem, the tribe of Judah were more full and exact in their genealogies than any other of the tribes, in which we must acknowledge a special providence, for the clearing of the genealogy of Christ. 1. Here we find Bezaleel, who was head-workman in building the tabernacle, Exo 31:2. 2. Hezron, who was the son of Pharez (Ch1 2:5), was the father of all this progeny, his sons, Caleb and Jerahmeel, being very fruitful, and he himself likewise, even in his old age, for he left his wife pregnant when he died, Ch1 2:24. This Hezron was one of the seventy that went down with Jacob into Egypt, Gen 46:12. There his family thus increased, as other oppressed families there did. We cannot but suppose that he died during the Israelites' bondage in Egypt; and yet it is here said he died in Caleb-Ephratah (that is, Bethlehem), in the land of Canaan, Ch1 2:24. Perhaps, though the body of the people continued in Egypt, yet some that were more active than the rest, at least before their bondage came to be extreme, visited Canaan sometimes and got footing there, though afterwards they lost it. The achievements of Jair, here mentioned (Ch1 2:22, Ch1 2:23), we had an account of in Num 32:41; and, it is supposed, they were long after the conquest of Canaan. The Jews say, Hezron married his third wife when he was sixty years old (Ch1 2:21), and another afterwards (Ch1 2:24), because he had a great desire of posterity in the family of Pharez, from whom the Messiah was to descend. 3. Here is mention of one that died without children (Ch1 2:30), and another (Ch1 2:32), and of one that had no sons, but daughters, Ch1 2:34. Let those that are in any of these ways afflicted not think their case new or singular. Providence orders these affairs of families by an incontestable sovereignty, as pleaseth him, giving children, or withholding them, or giving all of one sex. He is not bound to please us, but we are bound to acquiesce in his good pleasure. To those that love him he will himself be better than ten sons, and give them in his house a place and a name better than of sons and daughters. Let not those therefore that are written childless envy the families that are built up and replenished. Shall our eye be evil because God's is good? 4. Here is mention of one who had an only daughter, and married her to his servant an Egyptian, Ch1 2:34, Ch1 2:35. If it be mentioned to his praise, we must suppose that this Egyptian was proselyted to the Jewish religion and that he was very eminent for wisdom and virtue, otherwise it would not have become a true-born Israelite to match a daughter to him, especially an only daughter. If Egyptians become converts, and servants do worthily, neither their parentage nor their servitude should be a bar to their preferment. Such a one this Egyptian servant might be that she who married him might live as happily with him as if she had married one of the rulers of her tribe. 5. The pedigree of several of these terminates, not in a person, but in a place or country, as one is said to be the father of Kirjath-jearim (Ch1 2:50), another of Bethlehem (Ch1 2:51), which was afterwards David's city, because these places fell to their lot in the division of the land. 6. here are some that are said to be families of scribes (Ch1 2:55), such as kept up learning in their family, especially scripture-learning, and taught the people the good knowledge of God. Among all these great families we are glad to find some that were families of scribes. Would to God that all the Lord's people were prophets - all the families of Israel families of scribes, well instructed to the kingdom of heaven, and able to bring out of their treasury things new and old!

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 18–55. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 2:46 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.