Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the sons of Jahdai; Regem, and Jotham, and Geshan, and Pelet, and Ephah, and Shaaph.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of Jahdai H3056; Regem H7276, and Jotham H3147, and Geshan H1529, and Pelet H6404, and Ephah H5891, and Shaaph H8174.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of Yahdai: Regem, Yotam, Geshan, Pelet, 'Eifah and Sha'af.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The sons of Jahdai: Regem, Jotham, Geshan, Pelet, Ephah, and Shaaph.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Jahdai: Regem, and Jothan, and Geshan, and Pelet, and Ephah, and Shaaph.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Jahdai: Regem, and Jothan, and Geshan, and Pelet, and Ephah, and Shaaph.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The sonnes of Iahdai were Regem, and Iotham, and Geshan, and Pelet, and Ephah, and Shaaph.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And sons of Jahdai: Regem, and Jotham, and Geshem, and Pelet, and Ephah, and Shaaph.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,354 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 2:47 provides a precise, concise entry within the extensive genealogical records of Judah, meticulously listing six sons of Jahdai: Regem, Jotham, Geshan, Pelet, Ephah, and Shaaph. This seemingly simple enumeration of names is profoundly significant, contributing to the Chronicler's diligent preservation of Israel's tribal identities and underscoring God's comprehensive knowledge and valuing of every individual within His covenant plan, thereby reinforcing the continuity of His promises across generations.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 2:47 is deeply embedded within the lengthy and highly detailed genealogies that open the book of 1 Chronicles, specifically within the lineage of Judah. This extensive section, spanning from 1 Chronicles 2:3 through 1 Chronicles 4:23, is the most comprehensive genealogical record in the book, deliberately highlighting Judah's preeminence as the royal tribe from which David and, ultimately, the Messiah would descend. The verse follows a series of intricate family lines, often noting intermarriages or specific family branches, such as those of Caleb and Hur, and their contributions to the nation's development. The Chronicler's deliberate inclusion of such granular detail, even for seemingly minor figures like Jahdai and his sons, emphasizes the meticulous preservation of identity and heritage for the post-exilic community, connecting them directly to their ancestral roots and the foundational covenants of Israel.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was most likely compiled in the post-exilic period (late 5th or early 4th century BCE), a critical time when the returned exiles were striving to rebuild their lives, their temple, and their national identity in Judah. Genealogies held paramount importance in ancient Israelite society, functioning as vital legal documents for establishing land claims, tribal affiliation, eligibility for priestly service, and validating the legitimacy of leadership, particularly the Davidic monarchy. The meticulous tracing of lineages, even for those who did not achieve widespread fame, provided a crucial sense of continuity and belonging for a people who had experienced profound displacement and cultural disruption. It powerfully reaffirmed their covenant relationship with God and their integral place within the unbroken historical narrative of God's chosen people, ensuring that the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and David remained relevant and tangible for their present and future.
  • Key Themes: This verse, as an integral part of the broader genealogical record, contributes to several overarching themes pervasive in 1 Chronicles. Firstly, it highlights Divine Memory and Meticulousness, demonstrating God's comprehensive knowledge and valuing of every individual within His sovereign plan, no matter how seemingly obscure. The inclusion of these names underscores that no one is forgotten by God, reinforcing His unwavering faithfulness to His covenant people, a truth echoed in Psalm 105:8. Secondly, it emphasizes Continuity and Identity, providing a tangible link for the post-exilic community to their rich heritage and reaffirming their secure place within the unbroken line of God's chosen nation. This continuity was absolutely crucial for rebuilding and maintaining a distinct Israelite identity amidst surrounding cultures. Thirdly, the preservation of these family lines, especially the Judahite lineage, powerfully testifies to God's Enduring Faithfulness to His Covenants, particularly the Davidic covenant. The meticulous record-keeping ensures the integrity of the royal line through which the Messiah would ultimately come, a lineage explicitly traced in the New Testament, as seen in Matthew 1:1.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • sons (Hebrew, bên, H1121): This term (H1121) literally means "son," but in a broader sense, it refers to a "builder of the family name." In the context of genealogies, "sons" signifies not just immediate male offspring but also descendants who contribute to the perpetuation and expansion of the family line. This highlights the foundational role of progeny in ancient Israelite society for continuity, inheritance, and the fulfillment of covenant promises related to offspring and nation-building.
  • Jahdai (Hebrew, Yehday, H3056): The name Jahdai (H3056) is derived from a root possibly meaning "Judaistic" or "united." While the specific individual Jahdai is not prominent elsewhere, the name itself, particularly its potential connection to "Judaistic," subtly reinforces his tribal affiliation and the broader theme of unity within the tribe of Judah. In a genealogical context, the father's name serves as the anchor for a new branch, emphasizing the lineage's specific origin point within the larger tribal structure.
  • Jotham (Hebrew, Yôwthâm, H3147): One of the six sons listed, Jotham (H3147) means "Jehovah (is) perfect" or "the Lord is upright." This theophoric name, common in ancient Israel, reflects a pervasive theological worldview where names served as affirmations of God's character and sovereignty. Its inclusion here, even for a figure whose life is not detailed, subtly embeds a declaration of divine perfection within the very fabric of the genealogical record, reminding readers of the God who oversees and perfects the lineage.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of Jahdai;": This introductory phrase serves to establish the direct familial relationship, clearly indicating that the names which follow are the male descendants of a specific individual named Jahdai. The conjunction "And" (the Hebrew waw) seamlessly connects this new entry to the preceding genealogical lists, maintaining the continuous flow of the Chronicler's meticulous record and placing this specific family unit within the larger, intricate framework of the tribe of Judah.
  • "Regem, and Jotham, and Geshan, and Pelet, and Ephah, and Shaaph.": This clause provides a straightforward enumeration of six distinct male individuals. The deliberate repetition of the conjunction "and" before each name serves to emphasize the unique identity of each son while simultaneously binding them together as a single, cohesive familial unit. In a culture where names often carried significant meaning, this list represents more than mere labels; it signifies distinct lives, potential contributions, and the continuation of the family line, each individual a vital thread in the larger tapestry of Israel's history and God's unfolding redemptive plan.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 2:47, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of 1 Chronicles, is Genealogy itself, presented through meticulous Enumeration or Listing. The verse exemplifies this by simply listing names, a common and crucial feature of ancient Near Eastern historical and legal records. This direct listing, devoid of narrative embellishment, serves to establish legitimacy, continuity, and identity, which were paramount for the post-exilic community rebuilding their nation. The repeated use of the conjunction "and" (the Hebrew waw consecutive) before each name is a form of Polysyndeton, creating a rhythmic, almost chant-like effect that emphasizes each individual name while linking them together in an unbroken chain. This technique underscores the Chronicler's exhaustive and precise record-keeping, ensuring no link in the lineage is omitted. Furthermore, the very act of recording these names, even those of seemingly obscure figures, highlights the Chronicler's profound theological conviction in Divine Memory, where every individual, no matter how minor their recorded deeds or how brief their mention, is known and valued by God within His grand historical and redemptive narrative.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 2:47, like all genealogical entries in Scripture, powerfully conveys the profound theological truth of God's meticulous attention to detail and His unwavering faithfulness to His covenant people. In a world where countless lives go unrecorded and forgotten, the divine inspiration behind these detailed lists ensures that even seemingly minor figures are remembered and given their rightful place within the grand narrative of salvation history. This meticulous preservation of lineage was not merely for historical accuracy but served as a tangible testament to God's unwavering commitment to maintaining a people for Himself and, crucially, to preserving the specific line through which the Messiah would ultimately come. It underscores that God's promises are not abstract concepts but are deeply rooted in real people, real families, and real history, culminating in the person and work of Jesus Christ.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

In a world that often measures worth by achievement, fame, or visible influence, 1 Chronicles 2:47 offers a profound and counter-cultural message: every life, no matter how seemingly obscure or uncelebrated by human standards, is intimately known, deeply valued, and eternally remembered by God. Just as Jahdai's sons are meticulously recorded in the sacred text, so too are the intricate details of our lives significant in God's grand, unfolding plan. This verse invites us to find our true identity not in what we accomplish or how we are perceived by others, but fundamentally in whose we are—a cherished part of God's vast, interconnected family, linked by His enduring faithfulness across generations. It encourages us to live with the profound awareness that our lives, however ordinary they may seem in the daily grind, contribute meaningfully to a divine tapestry, and that God's comprehensive knowledge of us is an inexhaustible source of comfort, security, and ultimate purpose. We are not forgotten; we are remembered by the One who orchestrates all history and holds every life in His sovereign hand.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the Chronicler's meticulous record-keeping of names, even seemingly obscure ones, challenge my perception of what God truly values?
  • In what ways does knowing that God meticulously remembers every individual, even those whose stories are not fully told, provide comfort or challenge in my own life?
  • How can I live with a greater awareness of my unique place within God's larger redemptive story, recognizing that my life, however small it may seem, contributes to His ongoing work in the world?

FAQ

Why are these genealogies so long and detailed, and what is their purpose?

Answer: The genealogies in 1 Chronicles, including 1 Chronicles 2:47, are long and detailed because they served several crucial purposes for the post-exilic community in Judah. Firstly, they provided a legal and historical basis for land claims and tribal identity, which was essential for a people rebuilding after displacement and loss. Secondly, they established legitimacy for the priesthood and the Davidic monarchy, ensuring that those serving in the temple and those with claims to royal lineage were authentically descended from the correct families, maintaining order and divine mandate. Thirdly, and most importantly from a theological perspective, they offered a powerful affirmation of God's covenant faithfulness. By meticulously tracing the lines from Adam to the returned exiles, the Chronicler demonstrated that despite exile and hardship, God had preserved His people and maintained the lineage through which His promises, particularly the messianic promise, would be fulfilled. They reminded the people of their unbroken connection to their ancestral heritage and God's enduring commitment to them, as seen in Psalm 105:8.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 2:47, with its list of Jahdai's sons, appears to be a simple historical record, it finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment within the broader theological framework of the Bible. The meticulous preservation of these genealogies, particularly the lineage of Judah from which Jahdai's family stems, ultimately points to the unwavering faithfulness of God in preparing the way for the Messiah. Every name recorded, every generation listed, is a testament to God's sovereign hand guiding history toward the advent of His Son. The inclusion of seemingly "minor" figures underscores that God's plan is comprehensive and all-encompassing, valuing every individual within the grand tapestry of salvation history, culminating in the incarnation of Jesus Christ. He is the ultimate Son of David, the fulfillment of all the promises made to Abraham and his descendants, as affirmed in Matthew 1:1 and Romans 1:3. In Christ, the significance of every individual is truly realized, for He is the one who knows each of us by name, calling His own sheep by name and leading them out (John 10:3). Thus, these ancient lists are not merely dry historical facts but vibrant threads woven into the rich tapestry of God's redemptive narrative, culminating in the person and work of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 2 verses 18–55

The persons mentioned in the former paragraph are most of them such as we read of, and most of them such as we read much of, in other scriptures; but very few of those to whom this paragraph relates are mentioned any where else. It should seem, the tribe of Judah were more full and exact in their genealogies than any other of the tribes, in which we must acknowledge a special providence, for the clearing of the genealogy of Christ. 1. Here we find Bezaleel, who was head-workman in building the tabernacle, Exo 31:2. 2. Hezron, who was the son of Pharez (Ch1 2:5), was the father of all this progeny, his sons, Caleb and Jerahmeel, being very fruitful, and he himself likewise, even in his old age, for he left his wife pregnant when he died, Ch1 2:24. This Hezron was one of the seventy that went down with Jacob into Egypt, Gen 46:12. There his family thus increased, as other oppressed families there did. We cannot but suppose that he died during the Israelites' bondage in Egypt; and yet it is here said he died in Caleb-Ephratah (that is, Bethlehem), in the land of Canaan, Ch1 2:24. Perhaps, though the body of the people continued in Egypt, yet some that were more active than the rest, at least before their bondage came to be extreme, visited Canaan sometimes and got footing there, though afterwards they lost it. The achievements of Jair, here mentioned (Ch1 2:22, Ch1 2:23), we had an account of in Num 32:41; and, it is supposed, they were long after the conquest of Canaan. The Jews say, Hezron married his third wife when he was sixty years old (Ch1 2:21), and another afterwards (Ch1 2:24), because he had a great desire of posterity in the family of Pharez, from whom the Messiah was to descend. 3. Here is mention of one that died without children (Ch1 2:30), and another (Ch1 2:32), and of one that had no sons, but daughters, Ch1 2:34. Let those that are in any of these ways afflicted not think their case new or singular. Providence orders these affairs of families by an incontestable sovereignty, as pleaseth him, giving children, or withholding them, or giving all of one sex. He is not bound to please us, but we are bound to acquiesce in his good pleasure. To those that love him he will himself be better than ten sons, and give them in his house a place and a name better than of sons and daughters. Let not those therefore that are written childless envy the families that are built up and replenished. Shall our eye be evil because God's is good? 4. Here is mention of one who had an only daughter, and married her to his servant an Egyptian, Ch1 2:34, Ch1 2:35. If it be mentioned to his praise, we must suppose that this Egyptian was proselyted to the Jewish religion and that he was very eminent for wisdom and virtue, otherwise it would not have become a true-born Israelite to match a daughter to him, especially an only daughter. If Egyptians become converts, and servants do worthily, neither their parentage nor their servitude should be a bar to their preferment. Such a one this Egyptian servant might be that she who married him might live as happily with him as if she had married one of the rulers of her tribe. 5. The pedigree of several of these terminates, not in a person, but in a place or country, as one is said to be the father of Kirjath-jearim (Ch1 2:50), another of Bethlehem (Ch1 2:51), which was afterwards David's city, because these places fell to their lot in the division of the land. 6. here are some that are said to be families of scribes (Ch1 2:55), such as kept up learning in their family, especially scripture-learning, and taught the people the good knowledge of God. Among all these great families we are glad to find some that were families of scribes. Would to God that all the Lord's people were prophets - all the families of Israel families of scribes, well instructed to the kingdom of heaven, and able to bring out of their treasury things new and old!

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 18–55. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 2:47 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.