TRV
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Chronicles 2 verses 18–55
The persons mentioned in the former paragraph are most of them such as we read of, and most of them such as we read much of, in other scriptures; but very few of those to whom this paragraph relates are mentioned any where else. It should seem, the tribe of Judah were more full and exact in their genealogies than any other of the tribes, in which we must acknowledge a special providence, for the clearing of the genealogy of Christ. 1. Here we find Bezaleel, who was head-workman in building the tabernacle, Exo 31:2. 2. Hezron, who was the son of Pharez (Ch1 2:5), was the father of all this progeny, his sons, Caleb and Jerahmeel, being very fruitful, and he himself likewise, even in his old age, for he left his wife pregnant when he died, Ch1 2:24. This Hezron was one of the seventy that went down with Jacob into Egypt, Gen 46:12. There his family thus increased, as other oppressed families there did. We cannot but suppose that he died during the Israelites' bondage in Egypt; and yet it is here said he died in Caleb-Ephratah (that is, Bethlehem), in the land of Canaan, Ch1 2:24. Perhaps, though the body of the people continued in Egypt, yet some that were more active than the rest, at least before their bondage came to be extreme, visited Canaan sometimes and got footing there, though afterwards they lost it. The achievements of Jair, here mentioned (Ch1 2:22, Ch1 2:23), we had an account of in Num 32:41; and, it is supposed, they were long after the conquest of Canaan. The Jews say, Hezron married his third wife when he was sixty years old (Ch1 2:21), and another afterwards (Ch1 2:24), because he had a great desire of posterity in the family of Pharez, from whom the Messiah was to descend. 3. Here is mention of one that died without children (Ch1 2:30), and another (Ch1 2:32), and of one that had no sons, but daughters, Ch1 2:34. Let those that are in any of these ways afflicted not think their case new or singular. Providence orders these affairs of families by an incontestable sovereignty, as pleaseth him, giving children, or withholding them, or giving all of one sex. He is not bound to please us, but we are bound to acquiesce in his good pleasure. To those that love him he will himself be better than ten sons, and give them in his house a place and a name better than of sons and daughters. Let not those therefore that are written childless envy the families that are built up and replenished. Shall our eye be evil because God's is good? 4. Here is mention of one who had an only daughter, and married her to his servant an Egyptian, Ch1 2:34, Ch1 2:35. If it be mentioned to his praise, we must suppose that this Egyptian was proselyted to the Jewish religion and that he was very eminent for wisdom and virtue, otherwise it would not have become a true-born Israelite to match a daughter to him, especially an only daughter. If Egyptians become converts, and servants do worthily, neither their parentage nor their servitude should be a bar to their preferment. Such a one this Egyptian servant might be that she who married him might live as happily with him as if she had married one of the rulers of her tribe. 5. The pedigree of several of these terminates, not in a person, but in a place or country, as one is said to be the father of Kirjath-jearim (Ch1 2:50), another of Bethlehem (Ch1 2:51), which was afterwards David's city, because these places fell to their lot in the division of the land. 6. here are some that are said to be families of scribes (Ch1 2:55), such as kept up learning in their family, especially scripture-learning, and taught the people the good knowledge of God. Among all these great families we are glad to find some that were families of scribes. Would to God that all the Lord's people were prophets - all the families of Israel families of scribes, well instructed to the kingdom of heaven, and able to bring out of their treasury things new and old!
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Continue studying 1 Chronicles 2:48 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
1 Chronicles 2:48 provides a succinct but significant entry within the extensive genealogies of the tribe of Judah, specifically detailing Maachah, one of Caleb's concubines, and the birth of her two sons, Sheber and Tirhanah. This seemingly brief verse serves as a meticulous record, contributing to the broader Chronicler's project of documenting Israel's lineage, thereby underscoring the divine preservation of family lines crucial for tribal identity, land inheritance, and the ultimate unfolding of God's covenantal promises, particularly through the descendants of Judah from whom the Messiah would come.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 2:48, and indeed throughout much of 1 Chronicles, is Genealogy. This meticulous listing of names and lineages serves as a foundational structure, establishing tribal identity, land rights, and the continuity of God's covenant people. Within this overarching structure, the Chronicler employs Nomenclaturism, where the mere mention of names, even without accompanying narratives, signifies their crucial place within the grand historical and redemptive narrative. The inclusion of a concubine and her sons, while seemingly minor or unconventional by modern standards, also functions as a subtle form of Inclusivity within the narrative, demonstrating that God's plan embraces all legitimate members of the family unit, regardless of their mother's specific marital status, thereby contributing to the comprehensive and unbroken record of the chosen people.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
1 Chronicles 2:48, though a brief genealogical entry, profoundly illustrates God's meticulous attention to detail and His sovereign orchestration of history through individual lives and family lines. It underscores the divine commitment to preserving a chosen lineage, not for its own sake, but as the divinely appointed vehicle for His covenant promises, ultimately leading to the Messiah. The inclusion of a concubine and her children within this sacred record testifies to God's ability to work through diverse social structures and His valuing of every legitimate life that contributes to the unfolding of His redemptive plan. This verse reminds us that even seemingly minor figures or unconventional family arrangements are woven into the intricate tapestry of God's overarching purpose, demonstrating His faithfulness across generations.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
In a world often obsessed with prominence, conventional structures, and individual achievements, 1 Chronicles 2:48 offers a quiet but powerful lesson: God's grand design is built upon countless individual lives, many of whom are known only by a name in an ancient record, and through family structures that might seem unconventional by modern standards. This verse invites us to consider the profound significance of every life, no matter how seemingly minor, in God's intricate plan. It challenges us to trust in God's meticulous sovereignty, recognizing that He is at work in every detail of history, weaving together diverse threads to accomplish His ultimate purposes. Just as Maachah and her sons contributed to the lineage of Judah, so too does every believer, in their unique place and calling, contribute to the ongoing story of God's kingdom. Our lives, our families, and our heritage are not random, but are part of a divinely ordered narrative that has eternal significance, reminding us that God remembers and uses every part of His creation.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What was the social status of a concubine in ancient Israel?
Answer: In ancient Israel, a concubine (Hebrew: pilegesh) was a recognized secondary wife, distinct from a primary wife but holding a legitimate and often respected position within the household. Unlike a mere servant, a concubine was typically taken with the express purpose of bearing children, especially to ensure the continuation of a man's lineage or to expand his household and influence. Children born to a concubine were considered legitimate heirs, though their inheritance rights might sometimes be secondary to those of children from a primary wife. Examples like Abraham and Hagar (Genesis 16:3) or Jacob and his concubines Bilhah and Zilpah (Genesis 30:3-13) illustrate this practice, where their children were fully integrated into the family and tribal structure. The inclusion of Maachah and her sons in Caleb's genealogy further confirms their legitimate status within the family of Judah.
Why are seemingly insignificant names like Sheber and Tirhanah included in the biblical record?
Answer: The inclusion of names like Sheber and Tirhanah, even without further narrative detail, is crucial for several reasons within the biblical context. Firstly, genealogies served as vital legal and historical documents in ancient Israel, establishing tribal identity, land rights, and the legitimacy of claims to leadership or priestly roles (e.g., Ezra 2:62). Every name contributed to the comprehensive and unbroken record, ensuring historical accuracy and legal validity. Secondly, from a theological perspective, it underscores God's meticulous attention to detail and His sovereign oversight of every individual life within His grand plan. Even those briefly mentioned play a part in the unfolding of His redemptive history. Finally, these names contribute to the full picture of a patriarch's legacy, demonstrating the breadth and strength of his family line, which was considered a significant sign of blessing and prosperity in ancient Israel.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The meticulous genealogical record in 1 Chronicles 2:48, tracing the descendants of Caleb through figures like Maachah and her sons, finds its ultimate significance and fulfillment in the person of Jesus Christ. These seemingly dry lists are not mere historical curiosities but are divinely preserved threads in the intricate tapestry of salvation history, meticulously woven by God to ensure the precise arrival of the promised Messiah. The inclusion of all legitimate offspring, even those from a concubine, foreshadows the radical inclusivity of God's grace in Christ, who came not just for one privileged line but to gather a people from every tribe, tongue, people, and nation (Revelation 7:9). The very purpose of these genealogies, culminating in the line of Judah from which Caleb descended, was to establish the legitimate human ancestry of the King of kings. Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38 provide the New Testament fulfillment, demonstrating how God faithfully preserved a specific lineage, navigating through diverse human circumstances and unconventional family structures, to bring forth the Lamb of God, who perfectly fulfills all the promises of the Old Testament and redeems all of humanity (John 1:29). Thus, 1 Chronicles 2:48, with its brief mention of Maachah and her sons, stands as a testament to God's unwavering faithfulness in orchestrating every detail of history for the ultimate revelation of His Son.