Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Timna was concubine to Eliphaz Esau's son; and she bare to Eliphaz Amalek: these were the sons of Adah Esau's wife.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Timna H8555 was concubine H6370 to Eliphaz H464 Esau's H6215 son H1121; and she bare H3205 to Eliphaz H464 Amalek H6002: these were the sons H1121 of Adah H5711 Esau's H6215 wife H802.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Timnah was the concubine of Elifaz 'Esav's son, and she bore to Elifaz 'Amalek. These were the descendants of 'Adah 'Esav's wife.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Additionally, Timna, a concubine of Esau’s son Eliphaz, gave birth to Amalek. These are the grandsons of Esau’s wife Adah.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Timna was concubine to Eliphaz Esau’s son; and she bare to Eliphaz Amalek: these are the sons of Adah, Esau’s wife.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Timna was concubine to Eliphaz, Esau’s son; and she bore to Eliphaz Amalek. These are the sons of Adah, Esau’s wife.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Timna was concubine to Eliphaz Esaus sonne, and bare vnto Eliphaz, Amalek: these be the sonnes of Adah Esaus wife.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Timnath hath been concubine to Eliphaz son of Esau, and she beareth to Eliphaz, Amalek; these are sons of Adah wife of Esau.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
Esau and Edom
Esau and Edom View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 1,053 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Genesis 36:12, a seemingly minor genealogical entry, profoundly introduces Amalek, born to Eliphaz (Esau's son) through his concubine Timna. This verse is critically significant as it marks the origin of the Amalekites, a nation destined to become a persistent, divinely condemned adversary of Israel throughout biblical history, thereby foreshadowing future conflicts and underscoring God's meticulous oversight of human lineage and His sovereign plan.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Genesis chapter 36 serves as the "toledot" or "account" of Esau, meticulously detailing his wives, children, and the tribal chiefs who descended from him. This chapter functions as a crucial narrative pivot, documenting the origins and early development of Israel's brother nation, Edom, before the biblical narrative shifts its exclusive focus to the descendants of Jacob. The inclusion of Esau's lineage, parallel yet distinct from Jacob's, highlights the unfolding of God's covenant promises through a specific line while acknowledging the broader family of Abraham. Verse 12, specifically, is embedded within the genealogy of Esau's firstborn son, Eliphaz, and its precise mention of Amalek's birth lays foundational groundwork for understanding subsequent narratives of conflict and divine decree.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The patriarchal society of the ancient Near East, as depicted in Genesis, featured complex family structures, including the practice of having concubines. A concubine (pilgesh) was a recognized secondary wife whose children were considered legitimate heirs, though their status might differ from those born to a primary wife. Timna's identity as a Horite (implied by her being the sister of Lotan, a Horite chief mentioned in Genesis 36:22), connects Esau's lineage to the indigenous inhabitants of Seir (Edom), indicating intermarriage and the absorption of local populations into the emerging Edomite nation. This verse reflects the fluid nature of tribal formation and the intermingling of peoples that characterized the region, setting the stage for the distinct national identities of Israel and Edom.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes to several overarching themes in Genesis and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it underscores the divine sovereignty in lineage, demonstrating God's meticulous oversight of the origins of nations, even those outside the direct covenant line of Israel. Secondly, it highlights the meticulous nature of biblical record-keeping, showing how seemingly minor genealogical details are preserved for their future theological and historical significance. Thirdly, and most importantly, it introduces the seeds of future conflict, specifically the enduring antagonism between the Amalekites and the Israelites. This seemingly innocuous birth foreshadows the unprovoked attack on Israel in the wilderness (Exodus 17:8-16) and the subsequent divine command to utterly blot out Amalek's memory (Deuteronomy 25:17-19), establishing a long-standing theological archetype of opposition to God's people and His purposes.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Genesis 36:12 states, "And Timna was concubine to Eliphaz Esau's son; and she bare to Eliphaz Amalek: these [were] the sons of Adah Esau's wife." This verse introduces Amalek as a son of Eliphaz, Esau's firstborn, but distinct from the sons Eliphaz had with his primary wife, Adah, who are listed in the preceding verses. Amalek's mother, Timna, is identified as a "concubine" (Hebrew: pilgesh), indicating a secondary wife whose children were nonetheless considered legitimate heirs within the patriarchal social structure. The final clause, "these [were] the sons of Adah Esau's wife," clarifies that the previously mentioned sons of Eliphaz (Teman, Omar, Zepho, Gatam, and Kenaz in Genesis 36:11) were indeed born to Adah, distinguishing them from Amalek, who was born to Timna.

Key Word Analysis

  • concubine (Hebrew, pîylegesh', H6370): From an uncertain derivation, this term refers to a secondary wife. In ancient Israelite and patriarchal society, a concubine held a recognized legal and social status, distinct from a primary wife but still part of the household. Children born to a concubine were considered legitimate heirs, as seen with figures like Bilhah and Zilpah (Jacob's concubines) or Hagar (Abraham's concubine). Timna's status as a concubine means Amalek was a legitimate son of Eliphaz, solidifying his place in the Edomite lineage and, by extension, in biblical history.
  • bare (Hebrew, yâlad', H3205): A primitive root meaning "to bear young" or "to beget." This verb is fundamental in genealogical contexts, signifying the act of giving birth and establishing lineage. In this verse, it directly links Timna to Amalek as his mother and confirms Amalek's direct descent from Eliphaz, thereby connecting him to Esau and the broader Edomite family tree. The use of this verb emphasizes the biological and legal continuity of the family line, crucial for understanding national origins.
  • Amalek (Hebrew, ʻĂmâlêq', H6002): Probably of foreign origin, this is the proper name of a descendant of Esau and, by extension, his posterity and their country. The seemingly straightforward mention of Amalek's birth here belies his immense future significance. He is the progenitor of the Amalekites, a nomadic people who would become Israel's first post-Exodus enemy and a perpetual antagonist throughout their history. His inclusion in this genealogy, even through a concubine, highlights the meticulous nature of biblical record-keeping and God's foresight in detailing the origins of nations that would play crucial roles in His unfolding plan.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Timna was concubine to Eliphaz Esau's son": This clause introduces Timna and defines her relationship to Eliphaz, Esau's firstborn son. Her designation as a "concubine" indicates a secondary, yet legitimate, marital status within the patriarchal household, underscoring the complex family structures of the time. This detail is important for establishing the legitimacy of Amalek's lineage within Esau's family.
  • "and she bare to Eliphaz Amalek": This is the central declaration of the verse, explicitly stating that Timna gave birth to Amalek, with Eliphaz as the father. This simple statement of birth carries immense weight, as it marks the historical and genealogical origin of a people who would become one of Israel's most formidable and enduring enemies, setting the stage for future narratives of conflict and divine judgment.
  • "these [were] the sons of Adah Esau's wife": This concluding clause serves to clarify the lineage of Eliphaz's other sons. It refers back to the sons listed in Genesis 36:11 (Teman, Omar, Zepho, Gatam, and Kenaz), confirming that they were born to Adah, Eliphaz's primary wife, thereby distinguishing them from Amalek, who had a different mother (Timna). This phrasing ensures clarity in the genealogical record, even as it groups all of Eliphaz's offspring together.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in Genesis 36:12, and indeed throughout the chapter, is Genealogy. This is not merely a dry list of names but a purposeful record establishing lineage, legitimacy, and the historical progression of nations. The inclusion of Amalek's birth, even from a concubine, highlights the meticulousness of the biblical account in tracing the origins of peoples who would interact with God's covenant nation. Furthermore, the verse employs Foreshadowing. By introducing Amalek, the text subtly hints at future conflicts and the significant role this descendant will play in the history of Israel. The seemingly minor detail of his birth gains immense significance when viewed through the lens of later biblical narratives, where the Amalekites emerge as a persistent and divinely condemned adversary. There is also an implicit Juxtaposition within the broader chapter, as the detailed genealogy of Esau (Edom) stands in parallel to the implied, yet soon-to-be-detailed, genealogy of Jacob (Israel), setting up the relationship and eventual distinction between these two brother nations.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Genesis 36:12, though a brief genealogical note, is replete with profound theological and thematic implications. It underscores the meticulousness of divine providence, revealing that God's sovereign plan encompasses even the seemingly minor details of human lineage and the origins of nations. The inclusion of Amalek's birth, despite his mother's status as a concubine, demonstrates that every individual and every nation has a place within God's overarching historical narrative. This verse, therefore, serves as a foundational building block for understanding the complex tapestry of biblical history, where the seeds of future conflict and divine judgment are sown long before their full manifestation. It highlights God's foreknowledge and His orchestration of events, even those involving future adversaries of His chosen people.

  • Deuteronomy 25:17-19: This passage records God's command to Israel to "blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven" due to their unprovoked attack on the weak and weary Israelites in the wilderness.
  • Exodus 17:8-16: This narrative details the first major conflict between Israel and Amalek after the Exodus, where Joshua led the Israelites to victory while Moses held up his hands, symbolizing the spiritual nature of the warfare.
  • 1 Samuel 15:1-35: This chapter recounts King Saul's failure to fully obey God's command to utterly destroy the Amalekites, leading to his rejection as king and highlighting the severity of God's judgment against this nation.
  • Esther 3:1: Haman, the antagonist in the Book of Esther who sought to annihilate all Jews, is identified as an Agagite, a descendant of Agag, the Amalekite king spared by Saul, thus demonstrating the long-lasting enmity stemming from Amalek's lineage.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Genesis 36:12, though a brief genealogical entry, profoundly reminds us that no detail in God's Word is insignificant. It teaches us to appreciate the meticulousness of divine record-keeping and foresight, demonstrating how the seemingly minor birth of a child from a concubine can set the stage for millennia of historical and theological significance. Understanding the origins of nations and their relationships, even those rooted in complex family structures, helps us comprehend the unfolding of God's plan, the nature of long-standing conflicts, and the interconnectedness of biblical narratives across vast stretches of time. It encourages us to look for God's hand in every detail of history, recognizing that He orchestrates even the most obscure events for His ultimate purposes, often revealing His grand design through seemingly small, initial disclosures. This verse calls us to a deeper study of Scripture, recognizing that even the genealogies are not mere lists but vital threads in the tapestry of redemption.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does this seemingly minor genealogical detail reveal God's meticulous oversight of history and His long-term plans?
  • What can we learn about the nature of spiritual opposition and the importance of vigilance from the persistent enmity of Amalek against Israel?
  • How does understanding the interconnectedness of biblical narratives, from Genesis to later books, deepen our appreciation for the unity and coherence of God's Word?

FAQ

Who was Timna in relation to Esau?

Answer: Timna was the concubine of Eliphaz, who was Esau's firstborn son. Therefore, Timna was Esau's daughter-in-law by marriage, but in a secondary, concubine role. She is also identified as the sister of Lotan, a Horite chief (Genesis 36:22), indicating her connection to the indigenous inhabitants of Seir (Edom), where Esau's descendants settled.

Why is Amalek's birth so important if he's only mentioned briefly here?

Answer: Amalek's birth is crucial because he is the progenitor of the Amalekites, a nation that became a persistent and bitter enemy of Israel. Their first unprovoked attack on the Israelites after the Exodus (Exodus 17) led to a divine decree of perpetual warfare against them and a command to "blot out their remembrance" (Deuteronomy 25:17-19). Thus, Amalek's origin here is a foundational detail for understanding much subsequent biblical history, prophecy, and the theological concept of spiritual opposition.

What does the mention of a "concubine" imply about social structures in ancient times?

Answer: The term "concubine" (Hebrew: pilgesh) indicates a recognized secondary wife in patriarchal society. While she might not have the same social standing or legal rights as a primary wife, her children were considered legitimate heirs and part of the family lineage. This practice was common in the ancient Near East and contributed to the complex family trees that formed the early nations, demonstrating the diverse ways families were structured and heirs were produced in that era, all within a legally and socially accepted framework.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The persistent enmity of Amalek against Israel, originating from this genealogical entry in Genesis 36:12, ultimately points to the spiritual warfare that defines the human condition and finds its decisive resolution in Christ. Just as Amalek represented a relentless foe seeking to hinder God's people and their journey to the Promised Land, so too does sin, spiritual darkness, and the demonic realm oppose God's kingdom and His people. Christ, as the true Israel, the ultimate Deliverer, embodies the perfect fulfillment of God's decree against Amalek. He engaged and decisively defeated all spiritual "Amalekites"—the powers of sin, death, and the devil—through His atoning sacrifice on the cross (Colossians 2:15). His resurrection and ascension confirm His victory over the one who had the power of death (Hebrews 2:14). Ultimately, Christ's final return will ensure the complete "blotting out" of all evil and opposition, fulfilling the ancient decree against Amalek in a cosmic and redemptive sense, establishing His eternal reign of peace and righteousness where all enemies are put under His feet (1 Corinthians 15:25).

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 36 verses 9–19

Observe here, 1. That only the names of Esau's sons and grandsons are recorded, only their names, not their history; for it is the church that Moses preserves the records of, not the record of those that are without. Those elders that lived by faith alone obtained a good report. It is Sion that produces men of renown, not Seir, Psa 87:5. Nor does the genealogy go any further than the third and fourth generation; the very names of all after are buried in oblivion. It is only the pedigree of the Israelites, who were to be the heirs of Canaan, and of whom were to come the promised seed, and the holy seed, that is drawn out to any length, as far as there was occasion for it, even of all the tribes till Canaan was divided among them, and of the royal line till Christ came. 2. That these sons and grandsons of Esau are called dukes, Gen 36:15-19. Probably they were military commanders, dukes, or captains, that had soldiers under them; for Esau and his family lived by the sword, Gen 27:40. Note, Titles of honour have been more ancient out of the church than in it. Esau's sons were dukes when Jacob's sons were but plain shepherds, Gen 47:3. This is not a reason why such titles should not be used among Christians; but it is a reason why men should not overvalue themselves, or others, for the sake of them. There is an honour that comes from God, and a name in his house that is infinitely more valuable. Edomites may be dukes with men, but Israelites indeed are made to our God kings and priests. 3. We may suppose those dukes had numerous families of children and servants that were their dukedoms. God promised to multiply Jacob, and to enrich him; yet Esau increases, and is enriched first. Note, It is no new thing for the men of this world to be full of children, and to have their bellies too filled with hidden treasures, Psa 17:14. God's promise to Jacob began to work late, but the effect of it remained longer, and it had its complete accomplishment in the spiritual Israel.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 9–19. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 36:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.