Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Remember what Amalek did unto thee by the way, when ye were come forth out of Egypt;
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Remember H2142 what Amalek H6002 did H6213 unto thee by the way H1870, when ye were come forth H3318 out of Egypt H4714;
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"Remember what 'Amalek did to you on the road as you were coming out of Egypt,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Remember what the Amalekites did to you along your way from Egypt,
Ask
American Standard Version
Remember what Amalek did unto thee by the way as ye came forth out of Egypt;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Remember what Amalek did to you by the way as you came out of Egypt;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Remember what Amalek did vnto thee by the way, when ye were come out of Egypt:
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`Remember that which Amalek hath done to thee in the way, in your going out from Egypt,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 5,565 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Deuteronomy 25:17 issues a solemn command to Israel: to remember the treacherous act committed by Amalek against them during their vulnerable journey out of Egypt. This verse serves as a crucial historical reminder, laying the groundwork for a subsequent divine mandate concerning Amalek, emphasizing the lasting impact of their unprovoked malice and the importance of corporate memory for God's covenant people.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Deuteronomy 25 is part of Moses' final discourse to the Israelites on the plains of Moab, just before they enter the Promised Land. This chapter, like much of Deuteronomy, reiterates and expands upon various laws and commands previously given at Mount Sinai, serving as a comprehensive review and reinforcement of the Mosaic Covenant. Verses 17-19 form a distinct unit, specifically addressing the unique and grave command concerning Amalek. Its placement immediately following a series of civil and moral statutes (e.g., just weights and measures, gleaning laws) highlights the profound spiritual and historical significance of Amalek's act, elevating it beyond a mere tribal conflict to a matter of divine judgment and covenant fidelity.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The command in this verse refers directly to the unprovoked attack by Amalek on the weary and vulnerable Israelite stragglers at Rephidim, as recorded in Exodus 17:8-16. This occurred shortly after Israel's miraculous liberation from Egypt and their crossing of the Red Sea. The Amalekites, descendants of Esau (Genesis 36:12), were a nomadic, predatory people known for their opportunistic aggression. Their attack was particularly heinous because it targeted the weakest members of the Israelite camp—the exhausted, the elderly, and the infirm—demonstrating a profound lack of mercy and a direct affront to God's chosen people under divine protection. This act violated even the customary rules of ancient warfare, which often spared the non-combatants.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes to several overarching themes within Deuteronomy and the broader Pentateuch. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Remembrance (Heb. zakhar), which is central to Deuteronomic theology. Remembering past events, especially God's mighty acts and the challenges faced by Israel, is not merely historical recall but an active engagement that shapes present obedience and future action. Secondly, it introduces the theme of Divine Justice and Retribution. Amalek's unprovoked malice warrants a unique and severe divine judgment, setting the stage for the command in Deuteronomy 25:19 to "blot out the remembrance of Amalek." This highlights God's unwavering commitment to defending His covenant people and eradicating pervasive evil. Lastly, Amalek often serves as a symbol of Persistent Opposition, representing an insidious and archetypal enemy that continually opposes God's people and His redemptive purposes throughout biblical history.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Remember (Hebrew, zâkar', H2142): This verb implies far more than a simple cognitive recollection of facts. In the biblical context, zâkar denotes an active, intentional engagement with the past that demands a response in the present and future. It carries the weight of covenant obligation and faithfulness, requiring Israel to internalize the historical lesson of Amalek's treachery and to act accordingly. It's a call to keep the memory alive as a basis for future action.
  • Amalek (Hebrew, ‘Ămâlêq', H6002): The name identifies a specific tribal group, descendants of Esau through Eliphaz (Genesis 36:12). However, in this context, "Amalek" also functions as a symbol of an archetypal enemy. Their character was defined by opportunistic aggression, a lack of mercy, and a fundamental opposition to God's people and, by extension, to God Himself. Their attack on the weakest of Israel demonstrates their malicious nature.
  • by the way (Hebrew, derek', H1870): This phrase specifies the vulnerable context of the attack. It emphasizes that Amalek struck Israel when they were in transit, weary, and exposed in the wilderness. This detail highlights Amalek's cowardice and malice, choosing to attack when Israel was least prepared and most dependent on divine protection, rather than engaging in honorable combat.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Remember what Amalek did unto thee": This opening imperative is a direct, solemn command from Moses, underscoring the gravity and lasting significance of Amalek's act. It is not a suggestion but a divine mandate for Israel to maintain a corporate, active memory of this specific historical injustice, which is foundational for the subsequent command in Deuteronomy 25:19.
  • "by the way": This phrase precisely locates the circumstances of the attack. It occurred during Israel's vulnerable wilderness journey, when they were exhausted and strung out. This detail emphasizes Amalek's particularly cruel and cowardly strategy of targeting the stragglers and the weak at the rear of the camp, revealing a profound lack of honor and mercy.
  • "when ye were come forth out of Egypt;": This clause anchors the event to a pivotal moment in Israel's history—immediately following their miraculous liberation from slavery and their experience of God's powerful deliverance at the Red Sea. The attack thus represents not merely a tribal skirmish but a direct affront to God's redemptive work and His newly formed nation, challenging His divine protection and provision in the most direct way possible.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several powerful literary devices. The most prominent is the Imperative Mood ("Remember"), which immediately establishes the gravity and non-negotiable nature of the command, demanding active engagement from the audience. It functions as a concise Historical Allusion, referencing a well-known and deeply significant event (the attack in Exodus 17) without needing to recount all its details, thereby assuming and reinforcing the audience's shared national narrative and the profound impact of Amalek's treachery. Furthermore, this verse serves as a crucial act of Foreshadowing, preparing the audience for the more severe and unique command in Deuteronomy 25:19 to "blot out the remembrance of Amalek." The act of remembering becomes the necessary prelude and justification for this future divine retribution. Finally, Amalek, through this and subsequent biblical narratives, acquires Symbolism, coming to represent an archetypal enemy of God's people—insidious, persistent, and fundamentally opposed to God's purposes.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The command to "remember what Amalek did" is deeply rooted in Deuteronomic theology, which emphasizes the importance of corporate memory for covenant faithfulness. This remembrance is not merely an intellectual exercise but a call to acknowledge God's justice and the persistent nature of evil that opposes His people. Amalek's unprovoked attack on the weakest of Israel, immediately after their divine liberation, was an act of profound malice and a direct challenge to God's sovereignty. This act warranted a unique and severe divine judgment, underscoring God's commitment to defending His covenant people and eradicating pervasive evil. The memory serves as a perpetual reminder of the spiritual battle and the need for vigilance against those who would undermine God's purposes and harm His people.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Deuteronomy 25:17 transcends a mere historical footnote; it serves as a profound spiritual lesson for believers today. Just as Israel was commanded to maintain a vigilant memory of Amalek's insidious attack, we are called to be acutely aware of the persistent spiritual forces that seek to undermine our faith and hinder God's purposes in our lives. This involves recognizing the subtle and overt ways sin, temptation, and worldly ideologies attempt to wear down the weary and vulnerable among us. Remembering God's past faithfulness and His commitment to justice empowers us to stand firm, to contend against evil, and to protect the weakest members of the community. It reminds us that our spiritual journey is not without adversaries, but also that God is our ultimate defender and avenger, who will ultimately bring justice to all forms of malicious opposition.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "Amaleks" or persistent spiritual oppositions do you identify in your own life or in the church today?
  • How does remembering God's past acts of deliverance and justice strengthen your faith in present struggles?
  • In what ways can we, as individuals and as a community, protect the "weary and vulnerable" among us from spiritual attack?

FAQ

Why was Amalek's act considered so heinous by God?

Answer: Amalek's act was considered heinous for several reasons. First, it was an unprovoked attack on a people who had just been miraculously delivered by God from Egypt and were under His direct protection. Second, they specifically targeted the weakest and most vulnerable members of the Israelite camp – the stragglers, the weary, and the infirm (as explicitly stated in Deuteronomy 25:18). This demonstrated a profound lack of mercy and a cowardly, opportunistic malice. Third, it was a direct affront to God's honor and His covenant with Israel, challenging His power and presence among His people. This act, therefore, was not merely a military skirmish but an act of spiritual defiance against the Lord himself.

Does this command to "remember" imply a perpetual hatred or call to violence for believers today?

Answer: No, the command to "remember" Amalek in Deuteronomy 25:17 and the subsequent command to "blot out" their remembrance in Deuteronomy 25:19 must be understood within its specific historical, theological, and covenantal context. This was a unique divine judgment against a specific nation that had demonstrated persistent, malicious opposition to God's redemptive purposes for Israel. For believers today, this passage is not a call to literal physical violence against any ethnic group. Instead, Amalek serves as a symbolic representation of persistent, insidious evil and spiritual opposition (e.g., sin, the flesh, demonic forces) that seeks to undermine God's people and His kingdom. The "remembering" then becomes a call to spiritual vigilance, discernment, and active resistance against such spiritual adversaries, as taught in passages like Ephesians 6:12.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Deuteronomy 25:17, with its command to remember Amalek's insidious attack, finds its ultimate fulfillment and spiritual transformation in Christ. Amalek, as an archetypal enemy, symbolizes the persistent forces of sin, death, and the devil that relentlessly oppose God's people and His redemptive plan. Just as Israel was called to remember and ultimately contend with this physical foe, so too are believers called to recognize and resist the spiritual adversaries that seek to wear down the weary and vulnerable. Christ's life, death, and resurrection represent the definitive "blotting out" of these ultimate enemies. Through His triumph on the cross, Jesus disarmed the principalities and powers, making a public spectacle of them (Colossians 2:15). His victory ensures that the "remembrance" of these spiritual Amaleks will ultimately be eradicated, culminating in the final defeat of death and sin (1 Corinthians 15:26). Thus, Christ is the true Warrior who has defeated the ultimate enemies of God's people, establishing a kingdom where such malicious opposition will no longer exist (Revelation 20:10).

Copy as

Commentary on Deuteronomy 25 verses 13–19

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Here is, I. A law against deceitful weights and measures: they must not only not use them, but they must not have them, not have them in the bag, not have them in the house (Deu 25:13, Deu 25:14); for, if they had them, they would be strongly tempted to use them. They must not have a great weight and measure to buy by and a small one to sell by, for that was to cheat both ways, when either was bad enough; as we read of those that made the ephah small, in which they measured the corn they sold, and the shekel great, by which they weighed the money they received for it, Amo 8:5. But thou shalt have a perfect and just weight, v. 15. That which is the rule of justice must itself be just; if that be otherwise, it is a constant cheat. This had been taken care of before, Lev 19:35, Lev 19:36. This law is enforced with two very good reasons: - 1. That justice and equity will bring down upon us the blessing of God. The way to have our days lengthened, and to prosper, is to be just and fair in all our dealings Honesty is the best policy. 2. That fraud and injustice will expose us to the curse of God, Deu 25:16. Not only unrighteousness itself, but all that do unrighteously, are an abomination to the Lord. And miserable is that man who is abhorred by his Maker. How hateful, particularly, all the arts of deceit are to God, Solomon several times observes, Pro 11:1; Pro 20:10, Pro 20:23; and the apostle tells us that the Lord is the avenger of all such as overreach and defraud in any matter, Th1 4:6.

II. A law for the rooting out of Amalek. Here is a just weight and a just measure, that, as Amalek had measured to Israel, so it should be measure to Amalek again.

1.The mischief Amalek did to Israel must be here remembered, Deu 25:17, Deu 25:18. When it was first done it was ordered to be recorded (Exo 17:14-16), and here the remembrance of it is ordered to be preserved, not in personal revenge (for that generation which suffered by the Amalekites was gone, so that those who now lived, and their posterity, could not have any personal resentment of the injury), but in a zeal for the glory of God (which was insulted by the Amalekites), that throne of the Lord against which the hand of Amalek was stretched out. The carriage of the Amalekites towards Israel is here represented, (1.) As very base and disingenuous. They had no occasion at all to quarrel with Israel, nor did they give them any notice, by a manifesto or declaration of war; but took them at an advantage, when they had just come out of the house of bondage, and, for aught that appeared to them, were only going to sacrifice to God in the wilderness. (2.) As very barbarous and cruel; for they smote those that were more feeble, whom they should have succoured. The greatest cowards are commonly the most cruel; while those that have the courage of a man will have the compassion of a man. (3.) As very impious and profane: they feared not God. If they had had any reverence for the majesty of the God of Israel, which they saw a token of in the cloud, or any dread of his wrath, which they lately heard of the power of over Pharaoh, they durst not have made this assault upon Israel. Well, here was the ground of the quarrel: and it shows how God takes what is done against his people as done against himself, and that he will particularly reckon with those that discourage and hinder young beginners in religion, that (as Satan's agents) set upon the weak and feeble, either to divert them or to disquiet them, and offend his little ones.

2.This mischief must in due time be revenged, Deu 25:19. When their wars were finished, by which they were to settle their kingdom and enlarge their coast, then they must make war upon Amalek (Deu 25:19), not merely to chase them, but to consume them, to blot out the remembrance of Amalek. It was an instance of God's patience that he deferred the vengeance so long, which should have led the Amalekites to repentance; yet an instance of fearful retribution that the posterity of Amalek, so long after, were destroyed for the mischief done by their ancestors to the Israel of God, that all the world might see, and say, that he who toucheth them toucheth the apple of his eye. It was nearly 400 years after this that Saul was ordered to put this sentence in execution (1 Sa. 15), and was rejected of God because he did not do it effectually, but spared some of that devoted nation, in contempt, not only of the particular orders he received from Samuel, but of this general command here given by Moses, which he could not be ignorant of. David afterwards made some destruction of them; and the Simeonites, in Hezekiah's time, smote the rest that remained (Ch1 4:43); for when God judges he will overcome.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 13–19. Public domain.
Copy as
Richard ChallonerAD 1781
Amalec: This order for destroying the Amalecites, in the mystical sense, showeth how hateful they are to God, and what punishments they are to look for from his justice, who attack and discourage his servants when they are but just come out, as it were, of the Egypt of this wicked world and being yet weak and fainthearted, are but beginning their journey to the land of promise.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Deuteronomy 25:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.