Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
The sons H1121 of Japheth H3315; Gomer H1586, and Magog H4031, and Madai H4074, and Javan H3120, and Tubal H8422, and Meshech H4902, and Tiras H8494.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of Yefet: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Yavan, Tuval, Meshekh and Tiras.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras.
Ask
American Standard Version
The sons of Japheth: Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Japheth: Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The sonnes of Iapheth were Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Iauan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Sons of Japheth: Gomer and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 1:5 serves as a foundational verse within the opening genealogies of the book, meticulously listing the seven sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras. This enumeration is a crucial component of the "Table of Nations," which traces the post-Flood dispersion of humanity and establishes the universal scope of God's sovereign plan, even before the narrative narrows its focus to the lineage of Israel. It profoundly underscores the common origin of all peoples from Noah's family, highlighting both the inherent unity and the subsequent diversity of humankind under divine providence.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: The book of 1 Chronicles commences with an extensive and deliberate genealogical record, spanning its first nine chapters. This meticulous tracing begins with Adam, moves through the patriarchal lines, and then focuses on the descendants of Noah's three sons—Shem, Ham, and Japheth—before concentrating on the lineage of Abraham, David, and ultimately, the post-exilic community. 1 Chronicles 1:5 is specifically situated within the "Table of Nations" (1 Chronicles 1:5-23), which is nearly identical to the more expansive account found in Genesis 10. This placement immediately after the mention of Noah and his sons (1 Chronicles 1:4) establishes the universal historical framework from which the subsequent, more focused Israelite history will emerge. The Chronicler's decision to begin with such a broad scope underscores God's dominion over all humanity, not just Israel, setting the stage for understanding Israel's particular role within God's global redemptive plan and emphasizing the continuity of divine purpose from creation to the post-exilic era.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: For the original audience, primarily the Jewish community returning from Babylonian exile, these genealogies were far from dry lists; they served as a vital historical and theological anchor. They were essential for re-establishing identity, validating land claims, confirming tribal affiliations, and verifying priestly qualifications in a fragmented society. The "Table of Nations" in Genesis 10 and reiterated here in 1 Chronicles 1:5-23, reflects the ancient Near Eastern understanding of the world's peoples and their geographical distribution following a cataclysmic event (the Flood). The names listed—Gomer (Cimmerians), Magog (Scythian tribes), Madai (Medes), Javan (Greeks/Ionians), Tubal and Meshech (peoples in Anatolia/modern Turkey), and Tiras (Thracians/Tyrsenians)—represent significant ethno-geographical groups known to the biblical world, primarily located to the north and west of the ancient Near East. This demonstrates the biblical writers' awareness of the broader world and God's providential interaction with all its inhabitants.
  • Key Themes: This verse, as an integral part of the broader genealogical record, contributes to several significant themes. Firstly, it highlights the global scope of God's plan, demonstrating that all humanity, regardless of nation or tribe, traces its common origin back to Noah's family. This emphasizes the fundamental unity of humankind and the diversity that emerged from a single source, a concept foundational to understanding the universal call of the Gospel. Secondly, it underscores divine sovereignty in history, illustrating that God is not merely the God of Israel but the orchestrator of the dispersion and settlement of all peoples across the earth, meticulously detailing their origins. This reinforces the idea that all nations exist under His providential care and ultimate authority, a theme powerfully echoed in passages like Acts 17:26-28. Lastly, for the Chronicler's audience, these genealogies reaffirmed the importance of lineage and continuity, providing a historical anchor and a profound sense of belonging for a people seeking to rebuild their society and faith after exile, connecting them back to the very beginning of human history and God's enduring covenant promises.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • sons (Hebrew, bên, H1121): From the root meaning "to build," this term signifies a son or male descendant, but in a broader sense, it also refers to the collective progeny, a nation, or a people group. In genealogical contexts like this, "sons of Japheth" refers not merely to individual children but to the subsequent nations and territories that would be identified with these patriarchal figures. The meticulous listing of these "sons" (and their descendants in Genesis 10) serves to map out the known world and its inhabitants, asserting a divine ordering and historical reality to the dispersion of nations.
  • Japheth (Hebrew, Yepheth, H3315): Derived from a root meaning "expansion," Japheth was one of Noah's three sons, alongside Shem and Ham. His name's etymology is fitting given the vast geographical spread of his descendants described in the Table of Nations. In the biblical narrative, Japheth represents the progenitor of many peoples primarily located to the north and west of the ancient Near East, often associated with Indo-European groups. His inclusion here, alongside his brothers, emphasizes the universal scope of humanity's origins from a single family after the Flood, underscoring the unity of the human race before its diversification into distinct peoples.
  • Gomer (Hebrew, Gômer, H1586): Meaning "completion," Gomer is listed as the firstborn son of Japheth. He and his descendants are generally identified with the Cimmerians, an ancient people who migrated from the northern Black Sea region into Anatolia (modern Turkey) in the 8th-7th centuries BC. Their presence in the biblical genealogies highlights the Chronicler's awareness of the broader geopolitical landscape and the diverse peoples known to the ancient world, tracing their origins back to a common ancestor.

Verse Breakdown

  • "The sons of Japheth;": This opening clause immediately establishes the specific lineage being detailed, connecting the subsequent list of names to Japheth, one of the three progenitors of post-Flood humanity. By doing so, it places these nations within the universal framework of biblical history, signaling a transition from the general mention of Noah's sons to a precise enumeration of one significant branch of the human family. This structure highlights the ordered and intentional nature of God's unfolding plan for humanity.
  • "Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.": This is a direct enumeration of Japheth's seven sons, each representing a distinct people group or geographical region in the ancient world. Gomer is identified with the Cimmerians. Magog is often associated with Scythian tribes from the northern Black Sea steppes, gaining significant prophetic prominence in Ezekiel 38:2 where it is linked with Gog as a powerful northern nation. Madai clearly refers to the Medes, a powerful ancient Iranian people. Javan is the Hebrew name for Ionia, universally understood to represent the Greeks and other Hellenic peoples. Tubal and Meshech are frequently mentioned together in biblical texts (e.g., Ezekiel 27:13) and are typically identified with peoples and regions in eastern Anatolia, known for their metalworking. Tiras is possibly associated with the Thracians or Tyrsenians (Etruscans). This list, therefore, provides a biblical "map" of the world's early nations, asserting their common origin and divine ordering, demonstrating God's meticulous attention to the details of human history and the diversity of His creation.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device employed in 1 Chronicles 1:5, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a dry list of names but a purposeful literary construct that serves several crucial functions: it establishes historical continuity from creation, validates claims to identity and inheritance for the post-exilic community, and asserts the divine ordering of human history. Within the genealogy, Enumeration is prominently used, systematically listing the seven direct descendants of Japheth. This precise listing reinforces the Chronicler's meticulous attention to detail and the historical reality of the peoples mentioned, emphasizing the completeness and authority of the record. Furthermore, the near-verbatim repetition of this list from Genesis 10:2-5 functions as a powerful form of Intertextuality or Allusion, grounding the Chronicler's narrative firmly within the established foundational history of the Pentateuch and reinforcing the authoritative nature and divine inspiration of the earlier sacred texts.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 1:5, as an integral part of the Table of Nations, profoundly underscores the theological truth of humanity's common origin and God's universal sovereignty. Before the narrative narrows to the specific history of Israel, the Chronicler deliberately paints a global picture, demonstrating that all peoples, despite their diverse languages and cultures, descend from a single family. This establishes a foundational unity for humankind, challenging any notion of inherent racial or ethnic superiority and providing the basis for a universal understanding of sin and redemption. It highlights that God's plan is not limited to one nation but encompasses all creation, and His meticulous attention to the origins and dispersion of nations reveals His providential hand guiding history from its very inception. This universal scope sets the stage for understanding Israel's particular calling as a light to the nations, ultimately fulfilled in the global reach of the Gospel.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

In a world often fractured by ethnic, national, and cultural divisions, 1 Chronicles 1:5, a seemingly mundane list of ancient names, offers a profound theological anchor. It reminds us that all humanity shares a common ancestor in Noah, and ultimately in Adam, underscoring our fundamental interconnectedness and shared humanity. This truth should foster humility, empathy, and a recognition of the inherent dignity of every person, regardless of their background or perceived differences. For believers, it reinforces the expansive nature of God's love and redemptive plan, which was never intended to be confined to one people group but to embrace "every tribe and language and people and nation." Understanding this universal scope encourages us to participate in God's global mission, recognizing that our lineage, whether physical or spiritual, points back to His divine ordering of the world and His desire for all to know Him. It challenges us to look beyond our immediate communities, to dismantle prejudices, and to embrace the rich diversity of God's creation, seeing His hand in the formation and dispersion of all peoples throughout history.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding the common origin of humanity, as presented in this verse, impact your view of other cultures and nations, and your call to love your neighbor?
  • What does God's meticulous attention to the details of these genealogies reveal about His character and His active, providential involvement in human history?
  • How can the "Table of Nations" inform our understanding of God's global redemptive plan today, particularly in relation to missions and evangelism?

FAQ

Why are these genealogies so important in the Bible, especially in 1 Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies in the Bible serve several crucial purposes. For the original audience of 1 Chronicles, the returning exiles, they were vital for re-establishing their identity, land claims, tribal affiliations, and priestly qualifications after generations in Babylon. They provided a historical anchor, connecting them back to their foundational heritage and demonstrating God's faithfulness to His covenant promises through an unbroken line. Theologically, genealogies assert the historical reality of biblical events and figures, demonstrate God's sovereign hand in guiding history, and prepare the way for the coming Messiah by tracing His lineage, as powerfully illustrated in books like Matthew 1 and Luke 3.

How does 1 Chronicles 1:5 relate to the "Table of Nations" in Genesis 10?

Answer: 1 Chronicles 1:5 is an almost verbatim reproduction of Genesis 10:2-5, which details the descendants of Japheth. The Chronicler intentionally begins his historical account by reiterating this foundational "Table of Nations" from Genesis. This serves to connect the post-exilic community directly to the earliest history of humanity, reaffirming the unity of the human race and God's universal sovereignty over all peoples, not just Israel. It underscores that Israel's history is part of a larger, divinely orchestrated global narrative, emphasizing God's dominion over all nations from the very beginning.

What is the significance of Japheth's descendants being listed first among Noah's sons in this context?

Answer: While Shem is the line through which Abraham and Israel will descend, and Ham's descendants are often associated with peoples hostile to Israel, Japheth's descendants represent the peoples to the north and west, often seen as more distant or less directly involved in the immediate Israelite narrative. Listing them first (after the general introduction of Noah's sons) immediately establishes the universal scope of God's historical dealings. It sets the stage for the understanding that God's plan encompasses all humanity, not just the chosen line of Shem, before the Chronicler narrows the focus to the specific lineage of Israel. This broad beginning emphasizes God's dominion over all nations and the common origin of all humankind, laying a theological foundation for a global perspective on God's redemptive work.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 1:5 is a genealogical list from the Old Testament, seemingly far removed from Christ, it lays crucial groundwork for understanding the universal scope of His redemptive work. This verse, detailing the dispersion of Japheth's descendants, is part of the "Table of Nations" that establishes the common origin of all humanity from Noah's family. This fundamental unity of humankind, tragically fractured by sin at Babel and diversified into distinct nations, finds its ultimate restoration and reconciliation in Jesus Christ. The global spread of nations from a single source foreshadows the global reach of the Gospel, which actively breaks down the very ethnic and national barriers established in the post-Flood dispersion. In Christ, there is no longer "Jew or Gentile, slave or free, male or female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28), for He has made "one new humanity" out of two (Ephesians 2:15), reconciling both to God in one body through the cross. The very diversity of nations, hinted at in this verse, will ultimately gather before the throne of God, as people from "every tribe and language and people and nation" worship the Lamb (Revelation 7:9). Thus, this ancient list of names points forward to the comprehensive, all-encompassing salvation offered through Jesus, the Lamb of God, who came to redeem a people from every corner of the earth, fulfilling God's ancient plan for all humankind.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 1 verses 1–27

This paragraph has Adam for its first word and Abraham for its last. Between the creation of the former and the birth of the latter were 2000 years, almost the one-half of which time Adam himself lived. Adam was the common father of our flesh, Abraham the common father of the faithful. By the breach which the former made of the covenant of innocency, we were all made miserable; by the covenant of grace made with the latter, we all are, or may be, made happy. We all are, by nature, the seed of Adam, branches of that wild olive. Let us see to it that, by faith, we become the seed of Abraham (Rom 4:11, Rom 4:12), that we be grafted into the good olive and partake of its root and fatness.

I. The first four verses of this paragraph, and the last four, which are linked together by Shem (Ch1 1:4, Ch1 1:24), contain the sacred line of Christ from Adam to Abraham, and are inserted in his pedigree, Luk 3:34-38, the order ascending as here it descends. This genealogy proves the falsehood of that reproach, As for this man, we know not whence he is. Bishop Patrick well observes here that, a genealogy being to be drawn of the families of the Jews, this appears as the peculiar glory of the Jewish nation, that they alone were able to derive their pedigree from the first man that God created, which no other nation pretended to, but abused themselves and their posterity with fabulous accounts of their originals, the Arcadians fancying that they were before the moon, the people of Thessaly that they sprang from stones, the Athenians that they grew out of the earth, much like the vain imaginations which some of the philosophers had of the origin of the universe. The account which the holy scripture gives both of the creation of the world and of the rise of nations carries with it as clear evidences of its own truth as those idle traditions do of their own vanity and falsehood.

II. All the verses between repeat the account of the replenishing of the earth by the sons of Noah after the flood. 1. The historian begins with those who were strangers to the church, the sons of Japhet, who were planted in the isles of the Gentiles, those western parts of the world, the countries of Europe. Of these he gives a short account (Ch1 1:5-7), because with these the Jews had hitherto had little or no dealings. 2. He proceeds to those who had many of them been enemies to the church, the sons of Ham, who moved southward towards Africa and those parts of Asia which lay that way. Nimrod the son of Cush began to be an oppressor, probably to the people of God in his time. But Mizraim, from whom came the Egyptians, and Canaan, from whom came the Canaanites, are both of them names of great note in the Jewish story; for with their descendants the Israel of God had severe struggles to get out of the land of Egypt and into the land of Canaan; and therefore the branches of Mizraim are particularly recorded (Ch1 1:11, Ch1 1:12), and of Canaan, Ch1 1:13-16. See at what a rate God valued Israel when he gave Egypt for their ransom (Isa 43:3), and cast out all these nations before them, Psa 80:8. 3. He then gives an account of those that were the ancestors and allies of the church, the posterity of Shem, Ch1 1:17-23. These peopled Asia, and spread themselves eastward. The Assyrians, Syrians, Chaldeans, Persians, and Arabians, descended from these. At first the originals of the respective nations were known; but at this day, we have reason to think, the nations are so mingled with one another, by the enlargement of commerce and dominion, the transplanting of colonies, the carrying away of captives, and many other circumstances, that no one nation, no, nor the greatest part of any, is descended entire from any one of these fountains. Only this we are sure of, that God has created of one blood all nations of men; they have all descended from one Adam, one Noah. Have we not all one father? Has not one God created us? Mal 2:10. Our register hastens to the line of Abraham, breaking off abruptly from all the other families of the sons of Noah but that of Arphaxad, from whom Christ was to come. The great promise of the Messiah (says bishop Patrick) was translated from Adam to Seth, from him to Shem, from him to Eber, and so to the Hebrew nation, who were entrusted, above all nations, with that sacred treasure, till the promise was performed and the Messiah had come, and then that nation was made not a people.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–27. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Richard ChallonerAD 1781
To Japheth the son of Noah were born seven sons who occupied land in Asia from Amanus and Taurus of Coele-Syria and the mountains of Cilicia as far as the river Don. Then in Europe they occupied land as far as Gadira, leaving behind names for places and peoples, most of which were afterwards changed: others remain as they were. So Gomer actually refers to the Galatians; Magog to the Scythians; Madai to the Medes; Javan to the Ionians who are also the Greeks (from which we get 'the Ionian Sea'); and Thubal to the Iberians who are also the Spaniards from whom derive the Celtiberians, although certain people suppose them to be the Italians. Mosoch refers to the Cappadocians, so that among themselves up to the present day their city is also called Mazeca; Thiras refers to the Thracians, whose name has not been much changed. I know that a certain man has referred Gog and Magog, both as regards the present verse and in Ezekiel, to the account of the Goths who were recently raging in our land: whether this is true is shown by the outcome of the actual battle [recorded in Ezekiel 38-9]. But in fact all learned men in the past had certainly been accustomed to calling the Goths Getae rather than Gog and Magog. So these seven nations, which I have related as coming from the stock of Japheth, live in the region of the north. From the Ionians, that is from the Greeks, were born the Elisaei who are called the descendants of Aeolus; whence also the fifth language of Greece is called aeolis, which they themselves call pemptēn dialekton. Josephus thinks that Tharsis refers to the Cilicians, alleging that the aspirated letter theta has been badly corrupted into the letter tau by later individuals: consequently, their mother-city is called Tarsus, famous for the Apostle Paul. Cethim refers to the Citii, from whom the city of Citium in Cyprus is named up to the present. Dodanim are the inhabitants of Rhodes.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 1:5 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.