Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the sons of Gomer; Ashchenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of Gomer H1586; Ashchenaz H813, and Riphath H7384, and Togarmah H8425.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, Difat and Togarmah.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, and Diphath, and Togarmah.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, and Diphath, and Togarmah.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the sonnes of Gomer, Ashchenaz, and Iphath and Togarmah.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And sons of Gomer: Ashchenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.
Ask
See also
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 10,259 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 1:6 is a concise genealogical entry that lists Ashchenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah as the three sons of Gomer, who was the first son of Japheth. This verse, embedded within the extensive opening genealogies of 1 Chronicles, serves as a vital link in the biblical record of humanity's origins and the subsequent development of ancient peoples, underscoring God's sovereign hand in history and the meticulous preservation of lineage.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within the monumental genealogical record that comprises the first nine chapters of 1 Chronicles. The Chronicler, writing for a post-exilic community, meticulously traces the lineage of humanity from Adam through the patriarchs, the twelve tribes of Israel, and various other groups, including the descendants of Noah's sons. These genealogies are not mere lists but serve a profound theological and historical purpose: to establish the continuity of God's covenant promises, to affirm the identity and rightful claim to the land for the returning exiles, and to validate the Davidic line as the legitimate royal dynasty. Verse 6 specifically falls within the "Table of Nations," derived primarily from Genesis 10, detailing the descendants of Japheth, Noah's son, thereby connecting the Israelite narrative to the broader history of humanity.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: For the post-exilic community in Judah, identity and continuity were paramount. The destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple, coupled with the Babylonian exile, had severed their connection to their heritage and land. Genealogies, therefore, were crucial for re-establishing tribal affiliations, land claims, and the priestly and royal lines. In the ancient Near East, such records were not just for personal pride but were legal documents, crucial for inheritance, land ownership, and social status. The names listed in 1 Chronicles 1:6 (Gomer, Ashchenaz, Riphath, Togarmah) are widely identified with historical peoples (Cimmerians, Scythians, Armenians) who inhabited regions north and east of ancient Israel, particularly around Anatolia and the Black Sea. This demonstrates the biblical authors' awareness of the broader geopolitical landscape and their integration of universal history into the sacred narrative.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of 1 Chronicles 1:6 within the extensive genealogies highlights several key themes central to the Chronicler's message. Firstly, it emphasizes Divine Order and Continuity, showcasing God's sovereign plan unfolding through history, meticulously preserving lines of descent from creation to the post-exilic era, ultimately pointing towards the coming Messiah. Secondly, it underscores Humanity's Common Ancestry, tracing all peoples back to Noah's sons, thereby affirming the unified origin of all humanity, as also seen in Genesis 10:32. This foundational unity precedes the later dispersion and diversification of nations. Thirdly, the detailed nature of these records speaks to the Historical Veracity of the biblical account, demonstrating the Chronicler's commitment to presenting a reliable and accurate historical framework for God's redemptive work, ensuring the post-exilic community understood their place within this grand narrative.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Gomer (Hebrew, Gômer, H1586): This name, meaning "completion" according to its root, identifies a son of Japheth and the progenitor of a significant line of descendants. Historically, Gomer is widely associated with the Cimmerians, an ancient Indo-European people attested in Assyrian records as "Gimirrai," who migrated into Anatolia during the 8th-7th centuries BCE. The inclusion of Gomer reflects the biblical authors' awareness of broad ancient ethnography and the distribution of early post-Flood populations.
  • Ashchenaz (Hebrew, ʼAshkᵉnaz, H813): Of foreign origin, this name refers to a Japhethite descendant and the people stemming from him. Ashchenaz is often associated with the Scythians, a powerful nomadic people who succeeded the Cimmerians in the Pontic Steppe and expanded into parts of Anatolia and the Near East. The name appears in Jeremiah 51:27, where "Ashchenaz" is called upon to fight against Babylon, suggesting a powerful and distant nation.
  • Togarmah (Hebrew, Tôwgarmâh, H8425): Probably of foreign derivation, Togarmah is identified as a son of Gomer and the progenitor of a distinct posterity. This name is frequently linked to ancient regions in eastern Anatolia, particularly Armenia, or a city within that area. Ancient Armenian traditions sometimes trace their ancestry back to Togarmah, and Assyrian records mention a "Til-garimmu" in eastern Anatolia, aligning with this geographical identification. This connection underscores the biblical genealogies' grounding in real historical and geographical entities.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of Gomer;": This introductory phrase immediately establishes the paternal lineage, indicating that the subsequent names are the direct offspring of Gomer. It functions as a clear heading, organizing the vast genealogical data into discernible family units and demonstrating the structured nature of the Chronicler's record.
  • "Ashchenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.": This enumeration lists the three specific individuals or, more accurately, the emerging tribal or national groups that descended from Gomer. The order of names is consistent with the Genesis 10 account, reinforcing the Chronicler's reliance on and careful transmission of earlier biblical traditions. Each name represents a distinct branch of humanity that would develop into a recognized people group in the ancient world, contributing to the diverse tapestry of nations.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 1:6 and the surrounding chapters is Genealogy. This is not merely a list of names but a structured record of descent, serving to establish identity, legitimacy, and historical continuity. The Chronicler employs Enumeration by systematically listing the sons, providing a clear and concise presentation of lineage. This methodical approach highlights the meticulous nature of the biblical record and its commitment to historical detail. Furthermore, the entire section functions as a Historical Record, anchoring the narrative of Israel within the broader context of universal history, demonstrating God's involvement in the formation and development of all nations, not just Israel. The Conciseness of the verse, despite its profound implications, is also noteworthy, typical of genealogical entries that pack significant information into minimal words.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The seemingly dry list of names in 1 Chronicles 1:6 carries profound theological weight. It underscores God's meticulous attention to detail and His sovereign orchestration of human history, even in the formation and dispersion of nations. The fact that these "obscure" names are preserved in inspired Scripture reminds us that every individual and every people group has a place within God's grand narrative. It speaks to the faithfulness of God in preserving a lineage through which His redemptive plan would unfold, even amidst the complexities of human history and the rise and fall of empires. This verse, part of the "Table of Nations," lays the groundwork for understanding the universal scope of God's plan for humanity, a plan that extends beyond Israel to encompass all peoples.

  • Genesis 10:2-3 - This passage in Genesis is the primary source for the Japhetic lineage, including Gomer and his sons, demonstrating the continuity of the biblical record.
  • Acts 17:26 - Paul's sermon on Mars Hill affirms that God "made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place," echoing the themes of divine order and universal ancestry found in the genealogies.
  • Revelation 7:9 - This prophetic vision of a great multitude from "every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages" worshipping God directly connects to the universal scope foreshadowed in the Table of Nations, showing the ultimate fulfillment of God's global redemptive plan.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a simple list of names, 1 Chronicles 1:6 invites us to reflect on the profound truth that God is deeply invested in the details of history and the lives of all people. It reminds us that our individual lives, our families, and our national identities are not random occurrences but are part of a larger, divinely orchestrated story. This verse challenges us to see beyond the immediate and to appreciate the long arc of God's faithfulness across generations, preserving lineages and preparing the way for His ultimate purposes. It encourages us to find our place within this grand narrative, understanding that just as these ancient names were significant enough to be recorded, so too are our lives and contributions meaningful in God's eyes. It fosters a sense of belonging to a continuous story of faith that stretches from creation to Christ and beyond.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous recording of genealogies, even seemingly obscure ones, reveal God's character and His involvement in human history?
  • What does it mean for our understanding of humanity that all peoples trace their ancestry back to a common source, as depicted in these genealogies?
  • How can understanding the historical and cultural context of these ancient peoples enrich our appreciation for the biblical narrative?
  • In what ways does the inclusion of names like Ashchenaz and Togarmah broaden our perspective on God's redemptive plan beyond just the nation of Israel?

FAQ

Why are these genealogies, like 1 Chronicles 1:6, so important in the book of 1 Chronicles?

Answer: These genealogies are critically important for several reasons, especially for the post-exilic community to whom the Chronicler was writing. Firstly, they provided a vital sense of identity and continuity after the trauma of exile, reconnecting the people to their ancestral roots and the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Secondly, they established legitimacy for land claims and tribal inheritances upon their return to Judah. Thirdly, they meticulously traced the Davidic line, affirming the rightful claim of the Davidic dynasty to the throne, which was crucial for messianic expectation. Finally, they underscored the continuity of God's covenant promises, demonstrating His faithfulness in preserving a people and a lineage through whom His redemptive plan would unfold, culminating in the Messiah. The genealogies serve as the historical bedrock upon which the rest of the Chronicler's narrative is built, emphasizing God's sovereign hand in history, as seen in the detailed record of the "Table of Nations" in Genesis 10.

Are the names in 1 Chronicles 1:6 just individuals, or do they represent nations/peoples?

Answer: While the names technically refer to individuals (the "sons" of Gomer), in the context of the "Table of Nations" from which this genealogy is drawn (Genesis 10), these individuals are understood to be the progenitors of distinct tribal groups or nations. For example, Gomer is widely identified with the Cimmerians, Ashchenaz with the Scythians, and Togarmah with the Armenians. Thus, the names in 1 Chronicles 1:6 represent not just personal lineages but the foundational figures from whom significant ancient peoples emerged. This highlights the biblical narrative's awareness of the broader world and its diverse populations, showing how all humanity traces its origin back to Noah's family.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The meticulous genealogies in 1 Chronicles, including the seemingly peripheral entry of 1 Chronicles 1:6, find their ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus. The Chronicler's emphasis on preserving lineage, particularly the Davidic line, directly anticipates the coming of the Messiah, who would be born from that very lineage, as recorded in the Gospels (e.g., Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38). God's faithfulness in meticulously preserving these ancient family trees demonstrates His unwavering commitment to His redemptive plan, ensuring that the promised "seed" would arrive at the appointed time. Furthermore, the "Table of Nations" from which 1 Chronicles 1:6 is drawn, listing the progenitors of all humanity, foreshadows the universal scope of Christ's salvation. Just as Gomer's descendants represent diverse peoples, so too does Christ's atoning sacrifice extend to "every tribe and language and people and nation" (Revelation 5:9). The inclusion of all nations in the family tree of humanity, even before the call of Abraham, points to God's original design for all peoples to be in relationship with Him, a design fully realized in the global mission given by Christ in the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19-20). Thus, these ancient lists are not merely historical records but profound testaments to God's sovereign plan to bring salvation to all humanity through His Son, Jesus Christ.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 1 verses 1–27

This paragraph has Adam for its first word and Abraham for its last. Between the creation of the former and the birth of the latter were 2000 years, almost the one-half of which time Adam himself lived. Adam was the common father of our flesh, Abraham the common father of the faithful. By the breach which the former made of the covenant of innocency, we were all made miserable; by the covenant of grace made with the latter, we all are, or may be, made happy. We all are, by nature, the seed of Adam, branches of that wild olive. Let us see to it that, by faith, we become the seed of Abraham (Rom 4:11, Rom 4:12), that we be grafted into the good olive and partake of its root and fatness.

I. The first four verses of this paragraph, and the last four, which are linked together by Shem (Ch1 1:4, Ch1 1:24), contain the sacred line of Christ from Adam to Abraham, and are inserted in his pedigree, Luk 3:34-38, the order ascending as here it descends. This genealogy proves the falsehood of that reproach, As for this man, we know not whence he is. Bishop Patrick well observes here that, a genealogy being to be drawn of the families of the Jews, this appears as the peculiar glory of the Jewish nation, that they alone were able to derive their pedigree from the first man that God created, which no other nation pretended to, but abused themselves and their posterity with fabulous accounts of their originals, the Arcadians fancying that they were before the moon, the people of Thessaly that they sprang from stones, the Athenians that they grew out of the earth, much like the vain imaginations which some of the philosophers had of the origin of the universe. The account which the holy scripture gives both of the creation of the world and of the rise of nations carries with it as clear evidences of its own truth as those idle traditions do of their own vanity and falsehood.

II. All the verses between repeat the account of the replenishing of the earth by the sons of Noah after the flood. 1. The historian begins with those who were strangers to the church, the sons of Japhet, who were planted in the isles of the Gentiles, those western parts of the world, the countries of Europe. Of these he gives a short account (Ch1 1:5-7), because with these the Jews had hitherto had little or no dealings. 2. He proceeds to those who had many of them been enemies to the church, the sons of Ham, who moved southward towards Africa and those parts of Asia which lay that way. Nimrod the son of Cush began to be an oppressor, probably to the people of God in his time. But Mizraim, from whom came the Egyptians, and Canaan, from whom came the Canaanites, are both of them names of great note in the Jewish story; for with their descendants the Israel of God had severe struggles to get out of the land of Egypt and into the land of Canaan; and therefore the branches of Mizraim are particularly recorded (Ch1 1:11, Ch1 1:12), and of Canaan, Ch1 1:13-16. See at what a rate God valued Israel when he gave Egypt for their ransom (Isa 43:3), and cast out all these nations before them, Psa 80:8. 3. He then gives an account of those that were the ancestors and allies of the church, the posterity of Shem, Ch1 1:17-23. These peopled Asia, and spread themselves eastward. The Assyrians, Syrians, Chaldeans, Persians, and Arabians, descended from these. At first the originals of the respective nations were known; but at this day, we have reason to think, the nations are so mingled with one another, by the enlargement of commerce and dominion, the transplanting of colonies, the carrying away of captives, and many other circumstances, that no one nation, no, nor the greatest part of any, is descended entire from any one of these fountains. Only this we are sure of, that God has created of one blood all nations of men; they have all descended from one Adam, one Noah. Have we not all one father? Has not one God created us? Mal 2:10. Our register hastens to the line of Abraham, breaking off abruptly from all the other families of the sons of Noah but that of Arphaxad, from whom Christ was to come. The great promise of the Messiah (says bishop Patrick) was translated from Adam to Seth, from him to Shem, from him to Eber, and so to the Hebrew nation, who were entrusted, above all nations, with that sacred treasure, till the promise was performed and the Messiah had come, and then that nation was made not a people.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–27. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 1:6 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.