Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
If G1487 then G1161 I do G4160 that G5124 which G3739 I would G2309 not G3756, I consent G4852 unto the law G3551 that G3754 it is good G2570.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Now if I am doing what I don’t want to do, I am agreeing that the Torah is good.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And if I do what I do not want to do, I admit that the law is good.
Ask
American Standard Version
But if what I would not, that I do, I consent unto the law that it is good.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
But if what I don’t desire, that I do, I consent to the law that it is good.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
If I doe then that which I woulde not, I consent to the Lawe, that it is good.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And if what I do not will, this I do, I consent to the law that it is good,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Romans 7:16 encapsulates the profound internal conflict of a person who, despite an earnest desire to uphold God's righteous standard, finds themselves continually falling short. This verse reveals a crucial paradox: the very act of failing to do what one wills, and instead doing what one opposes, implicitly affirms the moral excellence and inherent goodness of the divine Law, demonstrating an internal agreement with its just demands even amidst personal inability.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Romans 7:16 is nestled within Paul's intricate and deeply personal exploration of the Law's function and humanity's struggle with sin, often referred to as the "wrestling match" of Romans 7. This chapter serves as a critical bridge between the declaration of justification by faith in Romans 3-5 and the triumphant freedom in the Spirit described in Romans 8. Immediately preceding this verse, Romans 7:15 sets the stage by stating, "For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I." Verse 16 directly follows this confession, providing the logical conclusion: if one hates what they do, it implies an agreement with the Law that condemns such actions as bad, thereby affirming the Law's goodness. Paul is building a case for the Law's inability to provide salvation or sanctification, not because the Law itself is flawed, but because of humanity's fallen nature.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Paul's audience in Rome included both Jewish and Gentile believers, many of whom would have had a deep reverence for the Mosaic Law. For Jewish Christians, understanding the Law's role post-Christ was paramount. The Law, given at Sinai, was considered God's perfect revelation of His will and righteousness, a covenant standard for Israel. However, it also served to expose sin (Romans 3:20) and highlight humanity's inability to perfectly fulfill God's demands. Paul's discourse here addresses the common misconception that the Law could provide righteousness or sanctification. He clarifies that the Law's purpose was not to save, but to reveal the extent of sin and humanity's desperate need for a different solution—God's grace in Christ. The cultural context would have been one where legalism (attempting to earn favor with God through strict adherence to rules) was a significant spiritual temptation, making Paul's theological precision all the more vital.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes in Romans and Paul's theology. Firstly, it underscores the goodness and holiness of the Law, a theme explicitly stated in Romans 7:12. Paul adamantly defends the Law's divine origin and moral perfection, ensuring his readers understand that the problem lies not with God's standard, but with humanity's sinfulness. Secondly, it highlights the power and pervasiveness of indwelling sin, demonstrating that even a person with good intentions and an understanding of righteousness is enslaved by a force that compels them to act contrary to their will. This internal struggle reveals the human inability to achieve righteousness by self-effort, setting the stage for the necessity of divine grace and the empowering work of the Holy Spirit, which becomes the glorious focus of Romans 8. The "I" of Romans 7, whether representing Paul himself, humanity under the Law, or the struggling believer, serves to illustrate the universal need for Christ's intervention.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • do (Greek, poiéō', G4160): This verb signifies to "make or do" in a very broad sense, encompassing actions, performance, and execution. In this context, it refers to the actual, often undesired, behaviors or choices the individual makes. The tension arises because the "doing" is contrary to the "willing," highlighting the disconnect between intent and action caused by the power of sin.
  • would (Greek, thélō', G2309): This word denotes a strong desire, choice, or preference stemming from subjective impulse or will. It signifies an internal determination or inclination. When Paul says "I would not," he is expressing a genuine, internal aversion to the actions he finds himself performing, emphasizing that his will is aligned with the Law, even if his actions are not.
  • consent (Greek, sýmphēmi', G4852): Derived from syn (with) and phēmi (to speak), this word literally means "to speak jointly" or "to agree with." It implies an internal assent, an acknowledgment, or an affirmation. When the "I" consents to the law that it is good, it means there is an intellectual and moral agreement with the Law's righteous demands, even as the individual struggles to live up to them. This consent validates the Law's authority and goodness.
  • good (Greek, kalós', G2570): This adjective describes something as "beautiful," "valuable," "virtuous," or "morally excellent." Unlike agathos, which often refers to intrinsic goodness, kalós frequently emphasizes that which is outwardly pleasing, honorable, or fitting. Here, it affirms the Law's inherent moral excellence and its admirable quality as a divine standard, reinforcing that the Law itself is not the source of the problem.

Verse Breakdown

  • "If then I do that which I would not,": This clause presents a hypothetical yet deeply experienced reality. The "I" performs actions ("do") that are contrary to its genuine desire or will ("would not"). This highlights the internal conflict and the power of sin to compel actions that are abhorrent to the individual's inner moral compass. It's a confession of a disconnect between intention and behavior, a common human experience.
  • "I consent unto the law": This is the crucial consequence of the preceding clause. Because the individual does what they do not want to do, they implicitly or explicitly agree with the Law's judgment against those actions. The act of doing what is undesired, and recognizing it as wrong, serves as an internal affirmation of the Law's righteous standard. The "I" acknowledges the Law's moral authority and its accurate assessment of what is right and wrong.
  • "that [it is] good.": This final phrase clarifies the nature of the consent. The individual agrees that the Law, which condemns their undesired actions, is inherently "good." This is a powerful theological statement. Despite the Law's inability to empower obedience, and despite its role in revealing sin, Paul insists on its moral perfection and divine origin. The problem is not with the standard, but with the human capacity to meet it.

Literary Devices

Paul's articulation in Romans 7:16 employs several potent literary devices. The primary device is Paradox, where the very act of failing to do what one desires (and instead doing what one hates) leads to the affirmation of the Law's goodness. This creates a striking and counter-intuitive truth: one's inability to obey paradoxically validates the standard of obedience. There is also an element of Confessional Tone through Paul's consistent use of the first-person singular "I" throughout Romans 7. This makes the struggle deeply personal and relatable, inviting the reader to identify with the internal conflict described. Furthermore, there's a subtle Personification of the Law, treating it as something to which one can "consent." While not explicitly attributing human qualities, the language implies a relationship of agreement or disagreement with an active entity, underscoring its moral authority.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Romans 7:16 profoundly illustrates the Law's dual function: it reveals God's perfect standard and exposes humanity's utter inability to meet it in their own strength. This internal consent to the Law's goodness, even while failing to keep it, underscores the universal need for a power beyond human will to overcome sin. It demonstrates that the problem is not the Law, but the "flesh"—the fallen human nature—which is weak and enslaved to sin, leading to a profound sense of helplessness that sets the stage for the glorious solution found in Christ.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Romans 7:16 offers profound comfort and clarity to anyone who has experienced the frustrating and often disheartening struggle between their desire to do what is right and their persistent failure to do so. It teaches us that this internal conflict is not a sign that God's Law is flawed, nor that our desire for righteousness is misguided. Instead, it highlights the deep-seated power of sin within us, even in the presence of a renewed mind that longs for God's will. Recognizing this struggle and admitting our inability to perfectly obey in our own strength is not a sign of weakness, but a crucial step towards true spiritual health. This self-awareness drives us away from self-reliance and legalism, compelling us to seek the divine help that only God's grace, through the Holy Spirit, can provide. It reminds us that our sanctification is not primarily a matter of willpower, but of yielding to the empowering presence of Christ within us, who alone can enable us to live in alignment with the good and holy Law of God.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of your life do you experience the tension between what you "would" (desire to do) and what you "do not" (actually do)?
  • How does recognizing the Law's goodness, even in your struggle, deepen your appreciation for God's character?
  • What does this verse teach you about the limits of human willpower in overcoming sin, and how does that point you to God's grace?
  • How can acknowledging this internal struggle lead you to greater humility and dependence on the Holy Spirit?

FAQ

Does Romans 7:16 imply that Paul, or the person described, is still under the condemnation of the Law?

Answer: Not necessarily under condemnation, but certainly under the Law's revelatory power. Romans 7:16, particularly in context with the surrounding verses, describes the experience of a person (whether Paul himself, or humanity in general, or the struggling believer) who is confronted by the Law's demands. The Law, being good, exposes the inability of the flesh to perfectly obey. The "consent unto the law that it is good" means the individual agrees with the Law's righteous standard, even if they fail to meet it. This agreement, however, leads to a profound sense of helplessness and frustration, which ultimately points to the need for a solution beyond the Law—the freedom and power found in Christ, as fully elaborated in Romans 8. The condemnation for those in Christ is removed (Romans 8:1), but the internal struggle with sin, and the Law's role in highlighting that struggle, can persist.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Romans 7:16, with its poignant portrayal of human moral bankruptcy despite internal assent to God's good Law, serves as a crucial theological setup for the glorious fulfillment found in Jesus Christ. The "I" who "does that which I would not" perfectly illustrates humanity's desperate need for a Savior who can accomplish what the Law, due to the weakness of the flesh, could not (Romans 8:3). Christ fulfills the Law's righteous demands not only by perfectly obeying it in His sinless life (Matthew 5:17) but also by bearing its curse and penalty on the cross for our disobedience (Galatians 3:13). Furthermore, through the indwelling Holy Spirit, Christ empowers believers to live in a new way, enabling them to fulfill the "righteous requirement of the law" not by their own efforts, but by walking "not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit" (Romans 8:4). Thus, the very struggle confessed in Romans 7:16 becomes the backdrop against which the liberating power and perfect provision of Christ shine most brightly, transforming internal consent into empowered obedience through His Spirit.

Copy as

Commentary on Romans 7 verses 14–25

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here is a description of the conflict between grace and corruption in the heart, between the law of God and the law of sin. And it is applicable two ways: - 1. To the struggles that are in a convinced soul, but yet unregenerate, in the person of whom it is supposed, by some, that Paul speaks. 2. To the struggles that are in a renewed sanctified soul, but yet in a state of imperfection; as other apprehend. And a great controversy there is of which of these we are to understand the apostle here. So far does the evil prevail here, when he speaks of one sold under sin, doing it, not performing that which is good, that it seems difficult to apply it to the regenerate, who are described to walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit; and yet so far does the good prevail in hating sin, consenting to the law, delighting in it, serving the law of God with the mind, that it is more difficult to apply it to the unregenerate that are dead in trespasses and sins.

I. Apply it to the struggles that are felt in a convinced soul, that is yet in a state of sin, knows his Lord's will, but does it not, approves the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law, and yet lives in the constant breach of it, Rom 2:17-23. Though he has that within him that witnesses against the sin he commits, and it is not without a great deal of reluctancy that he does commit it, the superior faculties striving against it, natural conscience warning against it before it is committed and smiting for it afterwards, yet the man continues a slave to his reigning lusts. It is not thus with every unregenerate man, but with those only that are convinced by the law, but not changed by the gospel. The apostle had said (Rom 6:14), Sin shall not have dominion, because you are not under the law, but under grace, for the proof of which he here shows that a man under the law, and not under grace, may be, and is, under the dominion of sin. The law may discover sin, and convince of sin, but it cannot conquer and subdue sin, witness the predominancy of sin in many that are under very strong legal convictions. It discovers the defilement, but will not wash it off. It makes a man weary and heavy laden (Mat 11:28), burdens him with his sin; and yet, if rested in, it yields no help towards the shaking off of that burden; this is to be had only in Christ. The law may make a man cry out, O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me? and yet leave him thus fettered and captivated, as being too weak to deliver him (Rom 8:3), give him a spirit of bondage to fear, Rom 8:15. Now a soul advanced thus far by the law is in a fair way towards a state of liberty by Christ, though many rest here and go no further. Felix trembled, but never came to Christ. It is possible for a man to go to hell with his eyes open (Num 24:3, Num 24:4), illuminated with common convictions, and to carry about with him a self-accusing conscience, even in the service of the devil. He may consent to the law that it is good, delight to know God's ways (as they, Isa 58:2), may have that within him that witnesses against sin and for holiness; and yet all this overpowered by the reigning love of sin. Drunkards and unclean persons have some faint desires to leave off their sins, and yet persist in them notwithstanding, such is the impotency and such the insufficiency of their convictions. Of such as these there are many that will needs have all this understood, and contend earnestly for it: though it is very hard to imagine why, if the apostle intended this, he should speak all along in his own person; and not only so, but in the present tense. Of his own state under conviction he had spoken at large, as of a thing past (Rom 7:7, etc.): I died; the commandment I found to be unto death; and if here he speaks of the same state as his present state, and the condition he was now in, surely he did not intend to be so understood: and therefore,

II. It seems rather to be understood of the struggles that are maintained between grace and corruption in sanctified souls. That there are remainders of indwelling corruption, even where there is a living principle of grace, is past dispute; that this corruption is daily breaking forth in sins of infirmity (such as are consistent with a state of grace) is no less certain. If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, Jo1 1:8, Jo1 1:10. That true grace strives against these sins and corruptions, does not allow of them, hates them, mourns over them, groans under them as a burden, is likewise certain (Gal 5:17): The flesh lusteth against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary the one to the other, so that you cannot do the things that you would. These are the truths which, I think, are contained in this discourse of the apostle. And his design is further to open the nature of sanctification, that it does not attain to a sinless perfection in this life; and therefore to quicken us to, and encourage us in, our conflicts with remaining corruptions. Our case is not singular, that which we do sincerely strive against, shall not be laid to our charge, and through grace the victory is sure at last. The struggle here is like that between Jacob and Esau in the womb, between the Canaanites and Israelites in the land, between the house of Saul and the house of David; but great is the truth and will prevail. Understanding it thus, we may observe here,

1.What he complains of - the remainder of indwelling corruptions, which he here speaks of, to show that the law is insufficient to justify even a regenerate man, that the best man in the world hath enough in him to condemn him, if God should deal with him according to the law, which is not the fault of the law, but of our own corrupt nature, which cannot fulfil the law. The repetition of the same things over and over again in this discourse shows how much Paul's heart was affected with what he wrote, and how deep his sentiments were. Observe the particulars of this complaint. (1.) I am carnal, sold under sin, Rom 7:14. He speaks of the Corinthians as carnal, Co1 3:1. Even where there is spiritual life there are remainders of carnal affections, and so far a man may be sold under sin; he does not sell himself to work wickedness, as Ahab did (Kg1 21:25), but he was sold by Adam when he sinned and fell - sold, as a poor slave that does his master's will against his own will - sold under sin, because conceived in iniquity and born in sin. (2.) What I would, that I do not; but what I hate, that do I, Rom 7:15. And to the same purport, Rom 7:19, Rom 7:21, When I would do good, evil is present with me. Such was the strength of corruptions, that he could not attain that perfection in holiness which he desired and breathed after. Thus, while he was pressing forward towards perfection, yet he acknowledges that he had not already attained, neither was already perfect, Phi 3:12. Fain he would be free from all sin, and perfectly do the will of God, such was his settled judgment; but his corrupt nature drew him another way: it was like a clog, that checked and kept him down when he would have soared upward, like the bias in a bowl, which, when it is thrown straight, yet draws it aside. (3.) In me, that is in my flesh, dwelleth no good, Rom 7:18. Here he explains himself concerning the corrupt nature, which he calls flesh; and as far as that goes there is no good to be expected, any more than one would expect good corn growing upon a rock, or on the sand which is by the sea-side. As the new nature, as far as that goes, cannot commit sin (Jo1 3:9), so the flesh, the old nature, as far as that goes, cannot perform a good duty. How should it? For the flesh serveth the law of sin (Rom 7:25), it is under the conduct and government of that law; and, while it is so, it is not likely to do any good. The corrupt nature is elsewhere called flesh (Gen 6:3, Joh 3:6); and, though there may be good things dwelling in those that have this flesh, yet, as far as the flesh goes, there is no good, the flesh is not a subject capable of any good. (4.) I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind, Rom 7:23. The corrupt and sinful inclination is here compared to a law, because it controlled and checked him in his good motions. It is said to be seated in his members, because, Christ having set up his throne in his heart, it was only the rebellious members of the body that were the instruments of sin - in the sensitive appetite; or we may take it more generally for all that corrupt nature which is the seat not only of sensual but of more refined lusts. This wars against the law of the mind, the new nature; it draws the contrary way, drives on a contrary interest, which corrupt disposition and inclination are as great a burden and grief to the soul as the worst drudgery and captivity could be. It brings me into captivity. To the same purport (Rom 7:25), With the flesh I serve the law of sin; that is, the corrupt nature, the unregenerate part, is continually working towards sin. (5.) His general complaint we have in Rom 7:24, O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? The thing he complains of is a body of death; either the body of flesh, which is a mortal dying body (while we carry this body about with us, we shall be troubled with corruption; when we are dead, we shall be freed from sin, and not before), or the body of sin, the old man, the corrupt nature, which tends to death, that is, to the ruin of the soul. Or, comparing it to a dead body, the touch of which was by the ceremonial law defiling, if actual transgressions be dead works (Heb 9:14), original corruption is a dead body. It was as troublesome to Paul as if he had had a dead body tied to him, which he must have carried about with him. This made him cry out, O wretched man that I am! A man that had learned in every state to be content yet complains thus of his corrupt nature. Had I been required to speak of Paul, I should have said, "O blessed man that thou art, an ambassador of Christ, a favourite of heaven, a spiritual father of thousands!" But in his own account he was a wretched man, because of the corruption of nature, because he was not so good as he fain would be, had not yet attained, neither was already perfect. Thus miserably does he complain. Who shall deliver me? He speaks like one that was sick of it, that would give any thing to be rid of it, looks to the right hand and to the left for some friend that would part between him and his corruptions. The remainders of indwelling sin are a very grievous burden to a gracious soul.

2.What he comforts himself with. The case was sad, but there were some allays. Three things comforted him: -

(1.)That his conscience witnessed for him that he had a good principle ruling and prevailing in him, notwithstanding. It is well when all does not go one way in the soul. The rule of this good principle which he had was the law of God, to which he here speaks of having a threefold regard, which is certainly to be found in all that are sanctified, and no others. [1.] I consent unto the law that it is good, Rom 7:16, sumphēmi - I give my vote to the law; here is the approbation of the judgment. Wherever there is grace there is not only a dread of the severity of the law, but a consent to the goodness of the law. "It is a good in itself, it is good for me." This is a sign that the law is written in the heart, that the soul is delivered into the mould of it. To consent to the law is so far to approve of it as not to wish it otherwise constituted than it is. The sanctified judgment not only concurs to the equity of the law, but to the excellency of it, as convinced that a conformity to the law is the highest perfection of human nature, and the greatest honour and happiness we are capable of. [2.] I delight in the law of God after the inward man, Rom 7:22. His conscience bore witness to a complacency in the law. He delighted not only in the promises of the word, but in the precepts and prohibitions of the word; sunēdomai expresses a becoming delight. He did herein concur in affection with all the saints. All that are savingly regenerate or born again do truly delight in the law of God, delight to know it, to do it - cheerfully submit to the authority of it, and take a complacency in that submission, never better pleased than when heart and life are in the strictest conformity to the law and will of God. After the inward man; that is, First, The mind or rational faculties, in opposition to the sensitive appetites and wills of the flesh. The soul is the inward man, and that is the seat of gracious delights, which are therefore sincere and serious, but secret; it is the renewing of the inward man, Co2 4:16. Secondly, The new nature. The new man is called the inner man (Eph 3:16), the hidden man of the heart, Pe1 3:4. Paul, as far as he was sanctified, had a delight in the law of God. [3.] With the mind I myself serve the law of God, Rom 7:25. It is not enough to consent to the law, and to delight in the law, but we must serve the law; our souls must be entirely delivered up into the obedience of it. Thus it was with Paul's mind; thus it is with every sanctified renewed mind; this is the ordinary course and way; thitherward goes the bent of the soul. I myself - autos egō, plainly intimating that he speaks in his own person, and not in the person of another.

(2.)That the fault lay in that corruption of his nature which he did really bewail and strive against: It is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. This he mentions twice (Rom 7:17, Rom 7:20), not as an excuse for the guilt of his sin (it is enough to condemn us, if we were under the law, that the sin which does the evil dwelleth in us), but as a salvo for his evidences, that he might not sink in despair, but take comfort from the covenant of grace, which accepts the willingness of the spirit, and has provided pardon for the weakness of the flesh. He likewise herein enters a protestation against all that which this indwelling sin produced. Having professed his consent to the law of God, he here professes his dissent from the law of sin. "It is not I; I disown the fact; it is against my mind that it is done." As when in the senate the major part are bad, and carry every thing the wrong way, it is indeed the act of the senate, but the honest party strive against it, bewail what is done, and enter their protestation against it; so that it is no more they that do it. - Dwelleth in me, as the Canaanites among the Israelites, though they were put under tribute: dwelleth in me, and is likely to dwell there, while I live.

(3.)His great comfort lay in Jesus Christ (Rom 7:25): I thank God, through Jesus Christ our Lord. In the midst of his complaints he breaks out into praises. It is a special remedy against fears and sorrows to be much in praise: many a poor drooping soul hath found it so. And, in all our praises, this should be the burden of the son, "Blessed be God for Jesus Christ." Who shall deliver me? says he (Rom 7:24), as one at a loss for help. At length he finds an all-sufficient friend, even Jesus Christ. When we are under the sense of the remaining power of sin and corruption, we shall see reason to bless God through Christ (for, as he is the mediator of all our prayers, so he is of all our praises) - to bless God for Christ; it is he that stands between us and the wrath due to us for this sin. If it were not for Christ, this iniquity that dwells in us would certainly be our ruin. He is our advocate with the Father, and through him God pities, and spares, and pardons, and lays not our iniquities to our charge. It is Christ that has purchased deliverance for us in due time. Through Christ death will put an end to all these complaints, and waft us to an eternity which we shall spend without sin or sigh. Blessed be God that giveth us this victory through our Lord Jesus Christ!

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 14–25. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Romans 13
You see here, that the understanding is not yet perverted, but keeps up its own noble character even during the action. For even if it does pursue vice, still it hates it the while, which would be great commendation, whether of the natural or the written Law. For that the Law is good, is (he says) plain, from the fact of my accusing myself, when I disobey the Law, and hate what has been done. And yet if the Law was to blame for the sin, how comes it that he felt a delight in it, yet hated what it orders to be done? For, "I consent," he says, "unto the Law, that it is good."
PelagiusAD 418
PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS
Paul says that if he does not want to do the particular evil which he does, at least he agrees with the law, which does not desire evil and prohibits it. But it can also be understood thus: if a man sins, he subjects himself to the severity of the law.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
AUGUSTINE ON ROMANS 44
The law is defended against every accusation, but we must be careful not to think that these words deny our free will, which is not true. The man being described here is under the law, before the coming of grace. Sin overpowers him when he attempts to live righteously in his own strength, without the help of God’s liberating grace. For by his free will a man is able to believe in the Deliverer and to receive grace. Thus with the deliverance and help of him who gives it, he will not sin and will cease to be under the law. Instead, being at one with the law or in the law, he will fulfill it by the love of God which he could not have done through fear.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
INTERPRETATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS
Paul says that he learned to hate what he does from the law, and therefore he defends the law and says that it was right.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Romans 7:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.