Numbers 32:6

KJV

And Moses said unto the children of Gad and to the children of Reuben, Shall your brethren go to war, and shall ye sit here?

KJV (with Strong's)

And Moses {H4872} said {H559} unto the children {H1121} of Gad {H1410} and to the children {H1121} of Reuben {H7205}, Shall your brethren {H251} go {H935} to war {H4421}, and shall ye sit {H3427} here?

Complete Jewish Bible

Moshe answered the descendants of Gad and of Re'uven: "Are your brothers to go to war while you stay here?

Berean Standard Bible

But Moses asked the Gadites and Reubenites, “Shall your brothers go to war while you sit here?

American Standard Version

And Moses said unto the children of Gad, and to the children of Reuben, Shall your brethren go to the war, and shall ye sit here?

Commentary

### SUMMARY
Numbers 32:6 captures Moses' incisive rhetorical challenge to the tribes of Gad and Reuben, who sought to settle east of the Jordan River before the full conquest of Canaan. This pivotal moment illuminates Moses' profound concern for the unity, shared responsibility, and unwavering commitment of the entire Israelite nation to God's divine plan, highlighting the potential for discouragement and division if some tribes shirked their collective duty to enter and conquer the Promised Land alongside their brethren.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** Numbers 32:6 is situated within a critical and tense negotiation between Moses and the tribes of Gad and Reuben. These tribes, having observed the fertile lands of Gilead and Bashan to be ideal for their abundant livestock, requested permission to settle there rather than crossing the Jordan River with the other tribes to conquer Canaan. This request, detailed in [Numbers 32:1-5](/numbers/32-1-5 "Numbers 32:1-5 - The Request of Gad and Reuben"), immediately provokes a strong and sharp rebuke from Moses. His reaction in this verse and the subsequent verses (e.g., [Numbers 32:7-15](/numbers/32-7-15 "Numbers 32:7-15 - Moses' Stern Rebuke and Warning")) is deeply informed by the painful and recent memory of the spies' report and the subsequent rebellion at [Kadesh-Barnea](/numbers/14 "Numbers 14 - The Rebellion at Kadesh-Barnea"), which resulted in forty years of wilderness wandering and the death of an entire generation. Moses' rhetorical question in verse 6 serves as a powerful opening salvo in a crucial dialogue that ultimately leads to a conditional agreement, ensuring the unity of the Israelite military effort and preventing a repeat of past failures.

* **Historical & Cultural Context:** At this juncture in Israel's history, they stood on the threshold of the Promised Land, poised to fulfill the ancient covenant promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob regarding their inheritance of the land. The conquest of Canaan was far more than a mere military campaign; it was a divinely ordained mission, requiring the full and unwavering participation and solidarity of all twelve tribes. In ancient Israelite society, tribal identity and communal responsibility were paramount, with the welfare and success of the collective often taking precedence over individual or sub-group interests. Moses' profound concern in this verse directly reflects the cultural expectation of shared burden in warfare, especially when the very existence and future of the nation were dependent on unified action. The bitter memory of past failures, particularly the lack of faith and unity that led to the prolonged wilderness wandering (recounted in [Numbers 14](/numbers/14 "Numbers 14 - The Spies and Rebellion")), loomed large, making any hint of disunity or shirking of duty a grave threat to national morale and divine favor.

* **Key Themes:** This verse powerfully contributes to several foundational themes within the book of Numbers and the broader Pentateuch. It vividly underscores the theme of **shared responsibility and corporate solidarity**, emphasizing that the fulfillment of God's covenant promises necessitated the unified effort of the entire community, not just a fragmented subset. Moses' challenging question highlights the inherent dangers of **selfishness and complacency**, particularly when immediate personal gain or comfort is prioritized over the collective mission and the well-being of one's brethren. Furthermore, it speaks to the crucial role of **courageous leadership** in discerning and challenging potentially divisive actions, thereby upholding the divine mandate and the integrity of the community. Moses, as a seasoned and divinely appointed leader, acutely understood the psychological impact of perceived abandonment and the potential for **discouragement** among the fighting men, a theme that resonates throughout Israel's wilderness experience and their preparations for conquest (e.g., the fear described in [Deuteronomy 1:28](/deuteronomy/1-28 "Deuteronomy 1:28 - Discouragement from the Spies' Report")).

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
#### Key Word Analysis
* **Moses (Hebrew, _Môsheh'_):** From H4872, meaning "drawing out (of the water), i.e. rescued." This name, indicative of his miraculous rescue, identifies the central figure of the Pentateuch, the divinely appointed leader and lawgiver of Israel. In Numbers 32:6, Moses acts not merely as a human leader but as God's representative, embodying the divine concern for Israel's unity and faithfulness to the covenant. His authority and past experience with Israel's failures give his words immense weight.
* **brethren (Hebrew, _ʼâch'_):** From H251, a primitive word meaning "a brother (used in the widest sense of literal relationship and metaphorical affinity or resemblance)." Moses' use of "brethren" (אֲחֵיכֶם, _ʼaḥeikhem_) is a powerful appeal to the familial and communal bonds within Israel. It emphasizes the shared lineage, destiny, and covenant relationship that should compel Gad and Reuben to act in solidarity with the other tribes, highlighting the moral obligation inherent in their shared identity.
* **sit (Hebrew, _yâshab'_):** From H3427, a primitive root meaning "properly, to sit down (specifically as judge. in ambush, in quiet); by implication, to dwell, to remain; causatively, to settle, to marry." When coupled with "here" (פֹה, _fo_), this verb signifies not just physical repose but a desire for permanent, comfortable settlement and, by implication, a withdrawal from the collective struggle. Moses employs this word to starkly contrast the proposed ease and security of settling east of the Jordan with the active, dangerous, and divinely mandated task of "going to war" that awaited their fellow tribes. It implies a shirking of duty and a prioritization of personal comfort over corporate responsibility.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"And Moses said unto the children of Gad and to the children of Reuben,"**: This opening clause immediately sets the scene for a direct and authoritative confrontation. Moses, as the leader bearing God's authority, addresses the specific tribal groups whose request has caused him grave concern. This direct address underscores the gravity of the situation, as the unity and future of the entire nation are at stake.
* **"Shall your brethren go to war,"**: This is the first half of Moses' rhetorical question, designed to evoke a sense of shared identity and responsibility. "Your brethren" (אֲחֵיכֶם, _ʼaḥeikhem_) directly appeals to their familial and communal ties, reminding them of their solidarity with the other tribes. "Go to war" (לַמִּלְחָמָה יֵלְכוּ, _lammilchamah yelchu_) refers to the imminent, perilous, and divinely mandated military conquest of Canaan, a task requiring immense sacrifice and courage. Moses highlights the active, dangerous, and sacrificial nature of the task awaiting the majority of the tribes.
* **"and shall ye sit here?"**: This is the second, contrasting half of the rhetorical question, directly challenging the proposed inaction and comfort of Gad and Reuben. As explored in the key word analysis, "sit here" implies a desire for ease, a shirking of duty, and a withdrawal from the collective struggle. The powerful juxtaposition of "go to war" and "sit here" is strategically designed to expose the perceived selfishness and moral impropriety of their request, aiming to evoke a sense of shame, responsibility, and a reconsideration of their priorities.

#### Literary Devices
Numbers 32:6 primarily employs a powerful **Rhetorical Question**. Moses does not seek an answer or information but rather aims to provoke deep reflection, a sense of shame, and ultimately, a change of heart in the tribes of Gad and Reuben. The question, "Shall your brethren go to war, and shall ye sit here?", is masterfully crafted to highlight the perceived absurdity, moral unacceptability, and profound injustice of their proposal, forcing them to confront the severe implications of their actions on the rest of the community. This device is highly effective in conveying Moses' strong disapproval and the ethical dilemma at hand. Additionally, the verse utilizes stark **Contrast**, setting the active, dangerous, and sacrificial act of "going to war" against the passive, comfortable, and self-serving act of "sitting here." This sharp juxtaposition underscores the perceived disparity in commitment and sacrifice, emphasizing the collective and unified nature of their national mission and the potential for division.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Numbers 32:6 serves as a foundational text for understanding the theological imperative of corporate solidarity and shared burden within God's covenant community. It illustrates vividly that God's redemptive purposes are consistently fulfilled through the unified and active effort of His people, where individual desires must often yield to the greater good of the collective mission. Moses' deep concern reflects a timeless divine principle: the well-being, strength, and ultimate success of the whole body depend intrinsically on the active participation, mutual support, and unwavering commitment of all its constituent parts. This principle transcends the ancient Israelite conquest, speaking profoundly to the church's mission today and the believer's call to participate actively and sacrificially in the advancement of the Kingdom of God, rather than seeking personal comfort or spiritual complacency while others labor in the spiritual battle. It underscores that true spiritual flourishing often comes through shared struggle and corporate faithfulness.

* [Romans 12:4-5](/romans/12-4-5 "Many Members, One Body")
* [Galatians 6:2](/galatians/6-2 "Bearing One Another's Burdens")
* [Hebrews 10:24-25](/hebrews/10-24-25 "Encouraging One Another to Love and Good Deeds")

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Numbers 32:6 offers profound and enduring lessons for contemporary believers, challenging us to critically examine our own commitment to the collective mission of God's people. In a world that frequently prioritizes individual comfort, personal autonomy, and immediate gratification, this verse calls us to a higher standard of shared responsibility and sacrificial service. It serves as a potent reminder that the spiritual battles we face—the vital work of evangelism, discipleship, social justice, and ministering to the hurting—are not meant to be borne by a select few, but by the entire body of Christ, each member contributing their unique gifts and efforts. Our choices, whether to actively engage in the work of the Kingdom or to "sit here" in spiritual apathy and complacency, have a tangible and significant impact on the morale, effectiveness, and spiritual progress of our fellow believers and the church as a whole. This passage urges us to resist the insidious temptation of spiritual disengagement and to wholeheartedly embrace our indispensable role in the ongoing work of God's kingdom, understanding that true fulfillment and spiritual vitality come not from avoiding the struggle but from participating faithfully and courageously in it alongside our brethren.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **Where in my life or in my church community am I tempted to "sit here" while others "go to war" in ministry, service, or spiritual disciplines?**
* **How do my personal choices and pursuit of comfort potentially impact the morale, unity, and effectiveness of my spiritual community and its mission?**
* **What specific, concrete steps can I take to more fully embrace my shared responsibility in the mission of God's church, moving from complacency to active participation?**
* **How does understanding the principle of corporate solidarity in Numbers 32:6 deepen my appreciation for the interconnectedness and unity of the body of Christ today?**

### FAQ
**Why was Moses so concerned about Gad and Reuben's request?**

Answer: Moses' deep concern stemmed from several critical and interconnected factors, rooted in both past experience and future imperative. First, he feared that the tribes of Gad and Reuben settling east of the Jordan would profoundly demoralize the other tribes, leading them to believe they were being abandoned in the arduous and dangerous task of conquering Canaan. This apprehension was not unfounded; it directly echoed the devastating impact of the spies' negative report at [Kadesh-Barnea](/numbers/14 "Numbers 14 - The Spies and Rebellion"), which caused the entire generation to wander in the wilderness for forty years and perish there. Moses understood the psychological fragility of the people. Second, Moses grasped the paramount importance of unity for the success of God's mission. The conquest of the Promised Land was not a series of individual tribal skirmishes but a collective, divinely ordained endeavor for the entire nation of Israel. Any division or perceived shirking of duty could undermine the entire national enterprise, jeopardizing their ability to fulfill God's covenant promises. He saw their request as potentially prioritizing personal comfort and immediate gain over the corporate responsibility to fulfill God's promise for all of Israel to inherit the land. His strong, almost accusatory reaction was therefore a protective measure for the spiritual, moral, and physical well-being of the entire nation, ensuring they would not repeat past failures of faith and commitment that had cost them so dearly.

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
While Numbers 32:6 vividly portrays Moses' concern for the unity and shared responsibility of Israel in conquering the earthly Promised Land, it finds its ultimate and profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the New Covenant's call to corporate participation in the spiritual conquest of God's Kingdom. Jesus Christ, the greater Moses, did not merely lead His people to a physical land but inaugurated a new spiritual reality, the Kingdom of God, and commissioned His disciples to "go and make disciples of all nations" ([Matthew 28:19](/matthew/28-19 "The Great Commission")). The temptation for Gad and Reuben to "sit here" while others "go to war" powerfully foreshadows the ongoing challenge for believers in every generation to remain actively engaged in the Great Commission, rather than succumbing to personal comfort or spiritual complacency. Christ Himself exemplified ultimate self-sacrifice, not "sitting here" in heavenly glory but humbling Himself to become obedient to death—even death on a cross ([Philippians 2:8](/philippians/2-8 "Christ's Humility and Obedience")). He bore the ultimate burden for His "brethren," bringing salvation and establishing the Church as a unified body, where every member is called to contribute to the common good and the advancement of the Gospel ([1 Corinthians 12:27](/1_corinthians/12-27 "You are the Body of Christ")). The unity Moses sought for Israel's physical inheritance is gloriously realized in Christ's body, the Church, where believers are called to bear one another's burdens ([Galatians 6:2](/galatians/6-2 "Bearing One Another's Burdens")) and collectively strive for the faith of the gospel ([Philippians 1:27](/philippians/1-27 "Striving Together for the Gospel")), actively participating in the spiritual warfare against sin and darkness until Christ's glorious return.

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

1 Corinthians 13:5

Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;

Philippians 2:4

Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others.

2 Samuel 11:11

And Uriah said unto David, The ark, and Israel, and Judah, abide in tents; and my lord Joab, and the servants of my lord, are encamped in the open fields; shall I then go into mine house, to eat and to drink, and to lie with my wife? [as] thou livest, and [as] thy soul liveth, I will not do this thing.