Skip to content
“Census Results by Tribe”· Numbers 26:5–51
Translation
King James Version
The sons of Simeon after their families: of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites: of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites: of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
The sons H1121 of Simeon H8095 after their families H4940: of Nemuel H5241, the family H4940 of the Nemuelites H5242: of Jamin H3226, the family H4940 of the Jaminites H3228: of Jachin H3199, the family H4940 of the Jachinites H3200:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The descendants of Shim'on, by their families, were: of N'mu'el, the family of the N'mu'eli; of Yamin, the family of the Yamini; of Yakhin, the family of the Yakhini;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
These were the descendants of Simeon by their clans: The Nemuelite clan from Nemuel, the Jaminite clan from Jamin, the Jachinite clan from Jachin,
Ask
American Standard Version
The sons of Simeon after their families: of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites; of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites; of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Simeon after their families: of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites; of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites; of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the children of Simeon after their families were: Nemuel, of whom came the familie of the Nemuelites: of Iamin, the familie of the Iaminites: of Iachin, the familie of the Iachinites:
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Sons of Simeon by their families: of Nemuel is the family of the Nemuelite; of Jamin the family of the Jaminite; of Jachin the family of the Jachinite;
Ask
In the KJVVerse 4,502 of 31,102 · 14.5%

Study This Verse

Summary

Numbers 26:12 meticulously records the family lines descended from three of Simeon's sons—Nemuel, Jamin, and Jachin—identifying them as the Nemuelites, Jaminites, and Jachinites respectively. This verse, embedded within the comprehensive second census of Israel on the plains of Moab, serves to underscore the divine precision in organizing and preserving the Israelite tribes, ensuring their continuity and readiness for the promised inheritance. It subtly highlights God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant people across generations, even amidst past failures and significant demographic shifts, as they stood on the cusp of entering the Promised Land.

Context

Literary Context

Numbers 26:12 is an integral part of the second national census of Israel, meticulously detailed in Numbers 26. This chapter systematically enumerates the male descendants aged twenty years and older from each tribe, mirroring the structure of the first census found in Numbers 1. The immediate preceding verses (Numbers 26:5-11) outline the families of Reuben and Simeon, with verse 12 specifically narrowing the focus to the subdivisions within Simeon's lineage. The overarching purpose of this census, as explicitly commanded in Numbers 26:2, was two-fold: to assess military strength for the impending conquest of Canaan and, more critically, to provide the basis for the equitable distribution of the land, as stipulated in Numbers 26:53-56. This detailed enumeration acts as a vital bridge, connecting the wilderness generation's demise with the new generation's entry into their inheritance, emphasizing divine order and preparedness.

Historical & Cultural Context

This pivotal second census transpired on the plains of Moab, situated on the eastern side of the Jordan River, just prior to Israel's entry into the Promised Land. Approximately 38 years had elapsed since the first census at Mount Sinai, marking the conclusion of the wilderness wanderings. This period was defined by God's judgment against the generation that rebelled at Kadesh-Barnea, resulting in the death of all those twenty years and older who had departed Egypt, with the notable exceptions of Joshua and Caleb (see Numbers 14). In ancient Israelite society, genealogies were of paramount importance, serving as the bedrock for establishing individual and tribal identity, validating claims to land inheritance, and confirming social standing. The precise listing of families, such as those of Simeon, was essential for ensuring that each family unit received its rightful portion of the future land. The tribe of Simeon, in particular, had experienced a dramatic demographic decline between the two censuses, plummeting from 59,300 to 22,200—the most significant proportional decrease among all tribes. This decline is often attributed, in part, to their prominent involvement in the idolatry and immorality at Baal Peor, a devastating incident recorded in Numbers 25.

Key Themes

Numbers 26:12, though a seemingly simple genealogical entry, profoundly contributes to several core themes woven throughout the book of Numbers and the Pentateuch. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates Divine Order and Sovereignty, showcasing God's meticulous attention to detail in the organization and governance of His covenant people, extending even to the smallest family units. Secondly, it serves as a testament to Generational Continuity and God's Unwavering Faithfulness to His Covenant. Despite the severe judgment meted out to the rebellious generation and the significant losses sustained, God faithfully preserved the lineage of Israel, ensuring the unbroken continuity of His promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (as initially articulated in Genesis 12:1-3). Thirdly, the census, including this specific verse, is intrinsically linked to the theme of Preparation for Inheritance. The precise identification of each family was a non-negotiable prerequisite for the equitable and just distribution of the Promised Land, thereby underscoring the tangible blessings that awaited the obedient and persevering generation. Finally, it subtly reinforces the theme of Judgment and Restoration, as the newly counted and prepared generation stands ready to enter the land that the previous generation, through their disobedience, had forfeited.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Sons bên H1121

The Hebrew word בֵּן (bên), Strong's H1121, signifies a son, often in the widest sense, including descendants or members of a group. In this verse, "The sons of Simeon" refers to the direct male offspring from whom the subsequent families are traced. This term is foundational, as the entire census is structured around the male heads of households and their descendants, emphasizing the patriarchal and patrilineal nature of Israelite society and the continuity of the tribal lines through male succession.

Family mishpâchâh H4940

The Hebrew word מִשְׁפָּחָה (mishpâchâh), Strong's H4940, appearing three times in this verse, denotes a family, clan, or a subdivision of a tribe. It represents a kinship group larger than a single household but smaller than a full tribe. The repetition of "the family of the Nemuelites," "the family of the Jaminites," and "the family of the Jachinites" underscores the meticulous nature of the census. It highlights that the enumeration was not merely a count of individuals but a detailed register of distinct lineage groups, each with its own identity, internal structure, and, crucially, its designated portion in the future land inheritance.

Verse Breakdown

"The sons of Simeon after their families:"

This introductory clause establishes the subject of the verse, focusing on the descendants of Simeon, one of Jacob's twelve sons. The phrase "after their families" immediately signals that the subsequent enumeration will be organized according to the distinct family units or clans that originated from Simeon's direct offspring, emphasizing the structured and systematic nature of the census.

"of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites:"

This clause precisely identifies Nemuel, one of Simeon's sons, and then specifies the distinct clan or sub-tribe that descended from him, known as the Nemuelites. This naming convention is crucial for clearly tracing lineage and assigning a specific identity within the broader tribal framework, reinforcing the meticulous record-keeping.

"of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites:"

Following the established pattern, this clause names Jamin, another son of Simeon, and his corresponding family line, the Jaminites. The consistent structure across these clauses highlights the systematic approach of the census, ensuring that each distinct family unit is accurately registered within the tribal record.

"of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites:"

The final clause in this verse lists Jachin, the third son of Simeon mentioned here, and his descendants, the Jachinites. The repetition of the pattern for each son underscores the rigorous detail with which these genealogies were recorded, a detail vital for the future apportionment of the land and the enduring preservation of tribal and familial identity.

Literary Devices

Numbers 26:12 predominantly employs Enumeration and Repetition, characteristic of genealogical and census texts. The verse is a prime example of Enumeration, systematically listing the specific family lines that descended from Simeon's sons. This straightforward, itemized listing serves a clear administrative and theological purpose: to organize and categorize the Israelite population for military readiness and land distribution. The consistent phrasing, "of [Son's Name], the family of the [Son's Name]ites," is a powerful instance of Repetition. This literary device not only creates a rhythmic and memorable pattern that aids in the recall of information but also emphatically underscores the distinct identity and continuity of each family unit, reinforcing the overall structure and divine order of the census. Furthermore, the very nature of the text is Genealogy, a literary form that meticulously traces lineage, establishing historical, social, and covenantal connections crucial for understanding the continuity and identity of God's covenant people through successive generations.

Theological and Thematic Connections

While seemingly a mere list of names, Numbers 26:12 carries profound theological weight, speaking volumes about God's character and His relationship with His people. It vividly portrays God's meticulous care, demonstrating that every family and individual within His covenant community is known, accounted for, and valued. This divine attention to detail assures us that God's overarching plans are precise, and His covenant promises are unwavering, even when human circumstances appear chaotic, diminished, or marked by failure. The remarkable continuity of these family lines, despite the severe judgment on the rebellious wilderness generation and the significant demographic losses, powerfully illustrates God's unyielding faithfulness to His covenant. He faithfully preserved the lineage of Israel, ensuring their survival as the chosen vehicle for His redemptive purposes, ultimately culminating in the advent of the Messiah. This census, therefore, transcends a simple demographic record; it stands as a profound theological statement about divine order, covenant fidelity, and the preparation for the ultimate fulfillment of God's promises.

Reflection and Application

Numbers 26:12 invites us to deeply consider the profound significance of our own individual and corporate place within God's unfolding redemptive narrative. Just as God meticulously accounted for each family in ancient Israel, preparing them for their earthly inheritance in the Promised Land, so too does He know, value, and meticulously care for every individual within His spiritual family today. This verse serves as a powerful reminder that we are not anonymous or overlooked in the eyes of our sovereign God; rather, we are integral parts of a divinely ordered community, each endowed with a unique identity, gifts, and purpose. It encourages us to cultivate unwavering trust in God's faithfulness across all generations, knowing that His overarching plan for humanity will prevail, even in the face of challenges, personal failures, or collective losses. Our spiritual lineage, rooted deeply in Christ, connects us to an eternal heritage of faith and an incorruptible inheritance that infinitely surpasses any earthly portion. We are called to live with intentionality and purpose, recognizing our vital role in God's ongoing work in the world, and to wholeheartedly embrace the glorious continuity of His covenant promises as manifested through the Church.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does the meticulous detail of this census, including the listing of specific families, speak to God's character and His personal care for individuals within His covenant community?
  2. In what ways does the continuity of these family lines, despite the wilderness generation's failures and the tribe's significant losses, powerfully demonstrate God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises?
  3. How can understanding our secure place within God's spiritual family (the Church) profoundly inform our sense of identity, purpose, and belonging in the world today?
  4. What "inheritance" are we, as believers in Christ, being prepared for, and how does this verse encourage us in that preparation and anticipation?

FAQ

Why is such a detailed list of names and families important in the Bible?

Detailed lists of names and families, such as those found in Numbers 26, are profoundly important for several interconnected reasons. Theologically, they underscore God's meticulous attention to detail and His personal knowledge of every individual within His covenant people, demonstrating that no one is overlooked in His divine and sovereign plan. Historically and culturally, these genealogies were absolutely crucial for establishing tribal identity, affirming legitimate lineage, and, most importantly, determining the precise rights to the land inheritance in Canaan, as explicitly stated in Numbers 26:53-56. Furthermore, they served to powerfully demonstrate the fulfillment of God's promises to multiply Abraham's descendants and to meticulously preserve the specific lineage through which the Messiah would ultimately come, providing a clear historical and theological anchor.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

While Numbers 26:12 functions as a precise genealogical record, its deeper theological currents flow directly and powerfully towards Christ, revealing His centrality in God's redemptive plan. The meticulous accounting of Israel's families underscores God's unwavering commitment to His covenant promises, particularly the foundational promise of a "seed" through whom all nations would ultimately be blessed (see Genesis 12:3). This verse, embedded within a census preparing a people for an earthly inheritance in Canaan, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate spiritual inheritance found exclusively in Christ. Just as the Israelites were meticulously counted and organized for their portion in the Promised Land, believers today are spiritually counted as integral members of God's spiritual family, the Church, through saving faith in Jesus Christ (as beautifully articulated in Ephesians 2:19). The divine preservation of these specific family lines, despite the wilderness generation's failures and the tribe of Simeon's significant decline, points prophetically to God's faithfulness in preserving a lineage that would ultimately produce the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world. Our true identity, lasting security, and eternal inheritance are found not in earthly genealogies or temporal possessions, but in being "in Christ," making us co-heirs with Him of an incorruptible, undefiled, and unfading inheritance reserved in heaven (as promised in 1 Peter 1:4).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Numbers 26:5–51.

1662–1714 · 47 verses
Passage under commentNumbers 26:5–51

This is the register of the tribes as they were now enrolled, in the same order that they were numbered in ch. 1. Observe,

I.The account that is here kept of the families of each tribe, which must not be understood of such as we call families, those that live in a house together, but such as were the descendants of the several sons of the patriarchs, by whose names, in honour of them, their posterity distinguished themselves and one another. The families of the twelve tribes are thus numbered: - Of Dan but one, for Dan had but one son, and yet that tribe was the most numerous of all except Judah, Num 26:42, Num 26:43. Its beginning was small, but its latter end greatly increased. Zebulun was divided into three families, Ephraim into four, Issachar into four, Naphtali into four, and Reuben into four; Judah, Simeon, and Asher, had five families apiece, Gad and Benjamin seven apiece, and Manasseh eight. Benjamin brought ten sons into Egypt (Gen 46:21), but three of them, it seems either died childless or their families were extinct, for here we find seven only of those names preserved, and that whole tribe none of the most numerous; for Providence, in the building up of families and nations, does not tie itself to probabilities. The barren hath borne seven, and she that hath many children has waxed feeble, Sa1 2:5.

II.The numbers of each tribe.

And here our best entertainment will be to compare these numbers with those when they were numbered at Mount Sinai. The sum total was nearly the same; they were now 1820 fewer than they were then; yet seven of the tribes had increased in number. Judah had increased 1900, Issachar 9900, Zebulun 3100, Manasseh 20,500, Benjamin 10,200, Dan 1700, and Asher 11,900. But the other five had decreased more than to balance that increase. Reuben had decreased 2770, Simeon 37,100, Gad 5150, Ephraim 8000, and Naphtali 8000. In this account we may observe, 1. that all the three tribes that were encamped under the standard of Judah, who was the ancestor of Christ, had increased, for his church shall be edified and multiplied. 2. That none of the tribes had increased so much as that of Manasseh, which in the former account was the smallest of all the tribes, only 32,200, while here it is one of the most considerable; and that of his brother Ephraim, which there was numerous, is here one of the least. Jacob had crossed hands upon their heads, and had preferred Ephraim before Manasseh, which perhaps the Ephraimites had prided themselves too much in, and had trampled upon their brethren the Manassites; but, when the Lord saw that Manasseh was despised, he thus multiplied him exceedingly, for it is his glory to help the weakest, and raise up those that are cast down. 3. That none of the tribes decreased so much as Simeon did; from 59,300, it such to 22,200, little more than a third part of what it was. One whole family of that tribe (namely Ohad, mentioned Exo 6:15) was extinct in the wilderness. Hence Simeon is not mentioned in Moses's blessing (Deu. 33), and the lot of that tribe in Canaan was inconsiderable, only a canton out of Judah's lot, Jos 19:9. Some conjecture that most of those 24,000 who were cut off by the plague for the iniquity of Peor were of that tribe; for Zimri, who was a ringleader in that iniquity, was a prince of that tribe, many of whom therefore were influenced by his example to follow his pernicious ways.

III.In the account of the tribe of Reuben mention is made of the rebellion of Dathan and Abiram, who were of that tribe, in confederacy with Korah a Levite, Num 26:9-11. Though the story had been largely related but a few chapters before, yet here it comes in again, as fit to be had in remembrance and thought of by posterity, whenever they looked into their pedigree and pleased themselves with the antiquity of their families and the glory of their ancestors, that they might call themselves a seed of evil doers. Two things are here said of them: - 1. That they had been famous in the congregation, Num 26:9. Probably they were remarkable for their ingenuity, activity, and fitness for business: - That Dathan and Abiram that might have been advanced in due time under God and Moses; but their ambitious spirits put them upon striving against God and Moses, and when they quarrelled with the one they quarrelled with the other. And what was the issue? 2. Those that might have been famous were made infamous: they became a sign, Num 26:10. They were made monuments of divine justice; God, in their ruin, showed himself glorious in holiness, and so they were set up for a warning to all others, in all ages, to take heed of treading in the steps of their pride and rebellion. Notice is here taken of the preservation of the children of Korah (Num 26:11); they died not, as the children of Dathan and Abiram did, doubtless because they kept themselves pure from the infection, and would not join, no, not with their own father, in rebellion. If we partake not of the sins of sinners, we shall not partake of their plagues. These sons of Korah were afterwards, in their posterity, eminently serviceable to the church, being employed by David as singers in the house of the Lord; hence many psalms are said to be for the sons of Korah: and perhaps they were made to bear his name so long after, rather than the name of any other of their ancestors, for warning to themselves, and as an instance of the power of God, which brought those choice fruits even out of that bitter root. The children of families that have been stigmatized should endeavour, by their eminent virtues, to roll away the reproach of their fathers.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 26:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.