Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ The sons of Simeon were, Nemuel, and Jamin, Jarib, Zerah, and Shaul:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
The sons H1121 of Simeon H8095 were, Nemuel H5241, and Jamin H3226, Jarib H3402, Zerah H2226, and Shaul H7586:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of Shim'on: N'mu'el, Yamin, Yariv, Zerach and Sha'ul.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The descendants of Simeon: Nemuel, Jamin, Jarib, Zerah, and Shaul.
Ask
American Standard Version
The sons of Simeon: Nemuel, and Jamin, Jarib, Zerah, Shaul;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Simeon: Nemuel, and Jamin, Jarib, Zerah, Shaul;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The sonnes of Simeon were Nemuel, and Iamin, Iarib, Zerah, and Shaul,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Sons of Simeon: Nemuel, and Jamin, Jarib, Zerah, Shaul;
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,410 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

First Chronicles 4:24 serves as a pivotal genealogical entry within the Chronicler's extensive records, meticulously listing the direct sons of Simeon: Nemuel, Jamin, Jarib, Zerah, and Shaul. This verse, embedded in the opening chapters of 1 Chronicles, underscores the divine preservation of Israel's tribal identities and heritage, offering crucial assurance and continuity to the post-exilic community by affirming God's unwavering covenant faithfulness across generations, even amidst dispersion and exile.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: First Chronicles 4:24 is situated within the foundational genealogical section of 1 Chronicles (chapters 1-9), which systematically traces the lineage of humanity from Adam through the patriarchs and the various tribes of Israel. Specifically, chapter 4 shifts focus from the extensive descendants of Judah (verses 1-23) to the tribe of Simeon (verses 24-43). This verse, therefore, acts as the primary entry point for Simeon's lineage, enumerating the direct progenitors from whom the subsequent clans and families of the tribe would emerge. The Chronicler's deliberate placement of these detailed genealogies at the book's outset emphasizes their profound importance for understanding Israel's identity, their enduring connection to God's covenant, and their divine election, thereby laying a robust historical and theological groundwork for the subsequent narratives concerning David and the monarchy.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was composed for the Jewish community that had returned to Judah following the Babylonian exile, most likely in the late 5th or early 4th century BCE. For this audience, who were grappling with questions of identity, land rights, and continuity after a period of displacement, genealogies were far more than mere historical records. They were indispensable legal and social documents that confirmed tribal affiliation, validated claims to ancestral land inheritances, established eligibility for priestly or Levitical service, and provided a vital sense of connection to their pre-exilic heritage. The meticulous detail in verses like 1 Chronicles 4:24 served to reassure a dislocated and often disheartened people that their identity as God's covenant people remained intact, and that their history was an integral part of a divinely orchestrated plan, linking them directly back to their patriarchs and the enduring promises made to them.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of 1 Chronicles 4:24 within the broader genealogical framework highlights several core themes central to the Chronicler's theological agenda. Firstly, it emphasizes the Continuity of God's Covenant and Promises, powerfully demonstrating that despite the profound disruption of exile and dispersion, God remained steadfastly faithful to His covenant with Abraham and Jacob, meticulously preserving the family lines of Israel. Secondly, these lists reinforce Identity and Belonging, providing a tangible and authoritative link for the post-exilic community to their tribal heritage and their rightful place within God's chosen nation, a theme consistently echoed in the detailed tribal allocations described in Joshua 13-19. Thirdly, the precise nature of the record-keeping underscores Divine Order and Sovereignty, revealing a God who is intimately involved in the intricate details of human history and who meticulously oversees the unfolding of His redemptive plan. The slight variations in the names of Simeon's sons across different biblical accounts (e.g., Genesis 46:10 and Numbers 26:12-13) also illustrate the dynamic and sometimes fluid nature of ancient genealogies, which could incorporate clan names, prominent descendants, or variant spellings, yet consistently served the overarching purpose of establishing legitimate and divinely preserved lineage.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • sons (Hebrew, bên, H1121): This term, derived from a root meaning "to build," signifies a male offspring who contributes to the building or continuation of the family name and lineage. In genealogies, "sons" can refer to direct biological descendants, but in broader contexts, it can also encompass grandsons, descendants, or even members of a clan or tribe. In 1 Chronicles 4:24, it primarily denotes the immediate progenitors of the tribe of Simeon, establishing the foundational family units from which the larger tribe would grow.
  • Simeon (Hebrew, Shimʻôwn, H8095): Meaning "hearing," Simeon was the second son of Jacob and Leah (Genesis 29:33). In this context, Simeon represents the patriarch whose direct descendants form one of the twelve tribes of Israel. His inclusion here is crucial for the Chronicler's purpose of meticulously tracing the lineage of all Israelite tribes, thereby affirming their identity and continuity within God's covenant people.
  • Shaul (Hebrew, Shâʼûwl, H7586): This name, meaning "asked" or "requested," is listed as one of Simeon's sons. Its inclusion, along with the other names, serves to complete the enumeration of Simeon's direct offspring, from whom the various clans and families of the tribe would trace their descent. The presence of Shaul across different biblical accounts of Simeon's sons (e.g., Genesis 46:10 and Numbers 26:12-13) highlights his consistent recognition as a foundational figure in the tribe's lineage.

Verse Breakdown

  • "The sons of Simeon [were], Nemuel, and Jamin, Jarib, Zerah, [and] Shaul:" This clause provides a direct and concise enumeration of five individuals identified as the immediate sons of Simeon. The primary purpose of this listing is to establish the foundational members from whom the tribe of Simeon would descend and be recognized. A significant textual feature is the variation in the names listed for Simeon's sons when compared to other biblical passages. Genesis 46:10 lists "Nemuel, and Jamin, and Ohad, and Jachin, and Zohar, and Shaul." Numbers 26:12-13 lists "Nemuel, and Jamin, Jachin, Zerah, and Shaul." The Chronicler's list includes "Jarib" instead of "Ohad" or "Jachin/Zohar" and includes "Zerah" as a direct son, consistent with Numbers but not Genesis. These variations are common in ancient genealogies and can be attributed to several factors: variant spellings of names over time, individuals having multiple names, the inclusion of prominent clan leaders or descendants as "sons," or minor scribal differences during transmission. Despite these differences, the core purpose of establishing the legitimate lineage of Simeon within the larger family of Israel remains consistent across all accounts, underscoring God's meticulous preservation of His people's identity.

Literary Devices

The dominant literary device employed in 1 Chronicles 4:24, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of 1 Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is far from a mere dry catalog; it is a deliberate literary and theological strategy by the Chronicler to establish historical continuity, validate tribal claims, and emphatically underscore the divine preservation of God's covenant people. The detailed listing of names, even acknowledging variations across biblical texts, highlights the Chronicler's meticulous approach to Historical Record and his profound concern for accuracy and comprehensive documentation, even while understanding the fluidity of ancient naming conventions. The very structure of the verse, a straightforward enumeration, exemplifies List as a literary form, designed for comprehensive cataloging and the systematic organization of information rather than a developing narrative. This consistent emphasis on lineage also subtly employs Typology by pointing forward to the ultimate genealogical fulfillment in the Messiah, whose own lineage is meticulously traced and affirmed in the New Testament, demonstrating God's consistent working through specific family lines.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The seemingly straightforward enumeration of names in 1 Chronicles 4:24 carries profound theological weight, serving as a powerful testament to God's meticulous care and unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises. In the challenging post-exilic context, where identity and heritage were fractured, these genealogies provided a tangible and authoritative link to the past, reminding the people that their existence was not accidental but an integral part of a divinely ordained plan. God's preservation of these specific family lines, even through periods of national catastrophe, dispersion, and apparent abandonment, underscores His steadfast commitment to His people and His redemptive purposes, demonstrating unequivocally that His plans will always come to fruition. This meticulous attention to lineage also powerfully prefigures the ultimate importance of a specific, divinely chosen lineage for the coming of the Messiah, thereby intimately connecting the Old Testament's focus on family lines to the New Testament's glorious revelation of Christ.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While 1 Chronicles 4:24 might initially appear as a simple historical record, its inclusion in the inspired Word of God offers significant spiritual nourishment and practical application for believers today. Just as the ancient Israelites found their identity, security, and assurance in their meticulously preserved heritage, we are called to embrace and appreciate our spiritual heritage as adopted children of God through Christ. This verse profoundly reminds us that God is a God of order, precision, and unwavering faithfulness. He cares for the seemingly small, foundational elements of His grand redemptive plan, ensuring the continuity of His purposes across countless generations. Our individual lives, though seemingly insignificant in the vast sweep of human history, are intimately known, cherished, and purposed by a God who meticulously orchestrates all things. This profound truth should inspire deep confidence in His divine providence, knowing that He has a specific and meaningful purpose for each of us within His larger redemptive narrative, connecting us to the "great cloud of witnesses" who have faithfully gone before us and assuring us of our secure and eternal place in His divine family.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding God's faithfulness in preserving ancient genealogies strengthen our trust in His specific promises for our lives today?
  • In what tangible ways does knowing our spiritual heritage as believers, adopted into God's family through Christ, provide a deep and abiding sense of identity and belonging?
  • What "details" in our own lives, or in the life and history of our church, might seem insignificant but are meticulously cared for by God as integral parts of His larger, sovereign plan?

FAQ

Why are there variations in the lists of Simeon's sons across different biblical books?

Answer: The variations in the names of Simeon's sons across Genesis 46:10, Numbers 26:12-13, and 1 Chronicles 4:24 are a common feature in ancient genealogies and can be attributed to several factors. These include variant spellings or pronunciations of names that evolved over time, the possibility of individuals having multiple names or nicknames, the inclusion of prominent descendants or clan leaders in a list of "sons" (as genealogies could sometimes reflect broader clan structures rather than exclusively strict biological succession), and minor differences that might arise during the scribal transmission and copying of ancient texts. Despite these minor textual nuances, the core purpose of establishing the legitimate lineage and tribal identity of Simeon remains consistent and clear across all accounts, underscoring God's faithful preservation of His people.

What was the primary purpose of genealogies like this in ancient Israel, especially for the Chronicler's audience?

Answer: For the ancient Israelites, particularly the post-exilic community to whom the Chronicler wrote, genealogies served several crucial purposes beyond mere historical record. They were vital for establishing and confirming tribal identity, which was fundamental to their social, religious, and political structure. Genealogies validated claims to ancestral land inheritances, ensuring that families could reclaim their rightful portions in the land. They were also essential for determining eligibility for priestly or Levitical service, as only those of specific lineages could serve in the temple (as seen in Ezra 2:59-63). Most importantly, these lists served a profound theological purpose: they demonstrated God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises, showing that He had meticulously preserved His people and their heritage through generations, even through periods of exile and dispersion, thus assuring them of His continued presence, power, and plan.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 4:24 meticulously details the physical lineage of Simeon, its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment lies in how it contributes to the broader biblical narrative of God's unwavering faithfulness to His promises, culminating in the perfect lineage of Jesus Christ. The very existence and meticulous preservation of these genealogies, spanning centuries of Israel's history, powerfully underscore God's commitment to a specific, divinely chosen line through whom His redemptive plan would ultimately unfold. The careful tracing of ancestry in books like Chronicles directly foreshadows the New Testament's equally precise documentation of Jesus's lineage (e.g., Matthew 1 and Luke 3), affirming Him as the promised Son of David and the rightful heir to all God's covenants and promises. In Christ, the focus shifts from a purely physical descent to a spiritual adoption. Through faith in Him, believers from every tribe, nation, and tongue are miraculously grafted into God's eternal family, becoming "sons of Abraham" by faith, not by birth, as profoundly taught in Galatians 3:28-29. Thus, the meticulous care God demonstrated in preserving the physical lines of Israel, as vividly seen in 1 Chronicles 4:24, ultimately points to His even greater, more expansive care in establishing a spiritual lineage in Christ, where all who believe are made fellow citizens with the saints and cherished members of God's eternal household (Ephesians 2:19-20).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 4 verses 24–43

We have here some of the genealogies of the tribe of Simeon (though it was not a tribe of great note), especially the princes of that tribe, Ch1 4:38. Of this tribe it is said that they increased greatly, but not like the children of Judah, Ch1 4:27. Those whom God increases ought to be thankful, though they see others that are more increased. Here observe, 1. The cities allotted them (Ch1 4:28), of which see Jos 19:1, etc. When it is said that they were theirs unto the reign of David (Ch1 4:31) intimation is given that when the ten tribes revolted from the house of David many of the Simeonites quitted these cities, because they lay within Judah, and seated themselves elsewhere. 2. The ground they got elsewhere. When those of this tribe that revolted from the house of David were carried captive with the rest into Assyria those that adhered to Judah were remarkably owned of God and prospered in their endeavours to enlarge their coasts. It was in the days of Hezekiah that a generation of Simeonites, whose tribe had long crouched and truckled, was animated to make these bold efforts. (1.) Some of them attacked a place in Arabia, as it should seem, called the entrance of Gedor, inhabited by the posterity of accursed Ham (Ch1 4:40), made themselves masters of it, and dwelt there. This adds to the glory of Hezekiah's pious reign, that, as his kingdom in general prospered, so did particular families. It is said that they found fat pastures, and yet the land was quiet; even when the kings of Assyria were giving disturbance to all their neighbours this land escaped their alarms. The inhabitants being shepherds, who molested none, were not themselves molested, till the Simeonites came and drove them out and succeeded them, not only in the plenty, but in the peace, of their land. Those who dwell (as we do) in a fruitful country, and whose land is wide, and quiet, and peaceable, have reason to own themselves indebted to that God who appoints the bounds of our habitation. (2.) Others of them, to the number of 500, under the command of four brethren here named, made a descent upon Mount Seir, and smote the remainder of the devoted Amalekites, and took possession of their country, Ch1 4:42, Ch1 4:43. Now the curses on Ham and Amalek had a further accomplishment, when they seemed dormant, if not dead; as had also the curse on Simeon, that he should be divided and scattered (Gen 49:7): yet to him it was turned into a blessing, for the families of Simeon, which thus transplanted themselves into those distant countries, are said to dwell there unto this day (Ch1 4:43), by which it should seem they escaped the calamities of the captivity. Providence sometimes sends those out of trouble that are designed for preservation.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 24–43. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 4:24 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.