TRV
Translation
King James Version
For Heshbon was the city of Sihon the king of the Amorites, who had fought against the former king of Moab, and taken all his land out of his hand, even unto Arnon.
Complete Jewish Bible
Heshbon was the city of Sichon, the king of the Emori, who had fought against the former king of Mo'av and conquered all his land up to the Arnon.
Berean Standard Bible
Heshbon was the city of Sihon king of the Amorites, who had fought against the former king of Moab and taken all his land as far as the Arnon.
American Standard Version
For Heshbon was the city of Sihon the king of the Amorites, who had fought against the former king of Moab, and taken all his land out of his hand, even unto the Arnon.
World English Bible Messianic
For Heshbon was the city of Sihon the king of the Amorites, who had fought against the former king of Moab, and taken all his land out of his hand, even to the Arnon.
Geneva Bible (1599)
For Heshbon was the citie of Sihon the king of the Amorites, which had fought beforetime against the king of the Moabites, and had taken al his land out of his hand, euen vnto Arnon.
Young's Literal Translation
for Heshbon is a city of Sihon king of the Amorite, and he hath fought against the former king of Moab, and taketh all his land out of his hand, unto Arnon;
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 4,367 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on Numbers 21 verses 21–35
21 ¶ And Israel sent messengers unto Sihon king of the Amorites, saying,
22 Let me pass through thy land: we will not turn into the fields, or into the vineyards; we will not drink of the waters of the well: but we will go along by the king's high way, until we be past thy borders.
23 And Sihon would not suffer Israel to pass through his border: but Sihon gathered all his people together, and went out against Israel into the wilderness: and he came to Jahaz, and fought against Israel.
24 And Israel smote him with the edge of the sword, and possessed his land from Arnon unto Jabbok, even unto the children of Ammon: for the border of the children of Ammon was strong.
25 And Israel took all these cities: and Israel dwelt in all the cities of the Amorites, in Heshbon, and in all the villages thereof.
26 For Heshbon was the city of Sihon the king of the Amorites, who had fought against the former king of Moab, and taken all his land out of his hand, even unto Arnon.
27 Wherefore they that speak in proverbs say, Come into Heshbon, let the city of Sihon be built and prepared:
28 For there is a fire gone out of Heshbon, a flame from the city of Sihon: it hath consumed Ar of Moab, and the lords of the high places of Arnon.
29 Woe to thee, Moab! thou art undone, O people of Chemosh: he hath given his sons that escaped, and his daughters, into captivity unto Sihon king of the Amorites.
30 We have shot at them; Heshbon is perished even unto Dibon, and we have laid them waste even unto Nophah, which reacheth unto Medeba.
31 Thus Israel dwelt in the land of the Amorites.
32 And Moses sent to spy out Jaazer, and they took the villages thereof, and drove out the Amorites that were there.
33 And they turned and went up by the way of Bashan: and Og the king of Bashan went out against them, he, and all his people, to the battle at Edrei.
34 And the LORD said unto Moses, Fear him not: for I have delivered him into thy hand, and all his people, and his land; and thou shalt do to him as thou didst unto Sihon king of the Amorites, which dwelt at Heshbon.
35 So they smote him, and his sons, and all his people, until there was none left him alive: and they possessed his land.
We have here an account of the victories obtained by Israel over Sihon and Og, which must be distinctly considered, not only because they are here distinctly related, but because long afterwards the memorial of them is distinctly celebrated, and they are severally assigned as instances of everlasting mercy. He slew Sihon king of the Amorites, for his mercy endureth for ever, and Og the king of Bashan, for his mercy endureth for ever, Psa 136:19, Psa 136:20.
I. Israel sent a peaceable message to Sihon king of the Amorites (Num 21:21), but received an unpeaceable return, worse than that of the Edomites to the like message, Num 20:18, Num 20:20. For the Edomites only refused them a passage, and stood upon their own defence to keep them out; but Sihon went out with his forces against Israel in the wilderness, out of his own borders, without any provocation given him (Num 21:23), and so ran himself upon his own ruin. Jephtha intimates that he was prompted by his politics to do this (Jdg 11:20), Sihon trusted not Israel to pass through his coast; but his politics deceived him, for Moses says, God hardened his spirit and made his heart obstinate, that he might deliver him into the hand of Israel, Deu 2:30. The enemies of God's church are often infatuated in those very counsels which they think most wisely taken. Sihon's army was routed, and not only so, but all his country came into the possession of Israel, Num 21:24, Num 21:25. This seizure is justified, 1. Against the Amorites themselves, for they were the aggressors, and provoked the Israelites to battle; and yet, perhaps, that would not have been sufficient to entitle Israel to their land, but that God himself, the King of nations, the Lord of the whole earth, had given them a grant of it. The Amorites formed one of the devoted nations whose land God had promised to Abraham and his seed, which promise should be performed when the iniquity of the Amorites should be full, Gen 15:16. Jephtha insists upon this grant as their title, Jdg 11:23, Jdg 11:24. The victory which God gave them over the Amorites put them in possession, and then, the promise made to their fathers having given them a right, by virtue of that they kept possession. 2. Against the Moabites, who had formerly been the lords-proprietors of this country. If they should ever lay claim to it, and should plead that God himself had provided that none of their land should be given to Israel for a possession (Deu 2:9), Moses here furnishes posterity with a replication to their plea, and Jephtha makes use of it against the Amorites 260 years afterwards, when Israel's title to this country was questioned. (1.) The justification itself is that though it was true this country had belonged to the Moabites, yet the Amorites had taken it from them some time before, and were now in full and quiet possession of it, Num 21:26. The Israelites did not take it out of the hands of the Moabites, they had before lost it to the Amorites, and were constrained to give up their pretensions to it; and, when Israel had taken it from the Amorites, they were under no obligation to restore it to the Moabites, whose title to it was long since extinguished. See here the uncertainty of worldly possessions, how often they change their owners, and how soon we may be deprived of them, even when we think ourselves most sure of them; they make themselves wings. It is our wisdom therefore to secure the good part which cannot be taken away from us. See also the wisdom of the divine Providence and its perfect foresight, by which preparation is made long before for the accomplishment of all God's purposes in their season. This country being designed in due time for Israel, it is beforehand put into the hand of the Amorites, who little think that they have it but as trustees till Israel come of age, and then must surrender it. We understand not the vast reaches of Providence, but known unto God are all his works, as appears in this instance, that he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel, Deu 32:8. All that land which he intended for his chosen people he put into the possession of the devoted nations, that were to be driven out. (2.) For proof of the allegation, he refers to the authentic records of the country, for so their proverbs or songs were, one of which he quotes some passages out of (Num 21:27-30), which sufficiently proves what is vouched for, namely, [1.] That such and such places that are here named, though they had been in the possession of the Moabites, had by right of war become the dominion of Sihon king of the Amorites. Heshbon had become his city, and he obtained such a quiet possession of it that it was built and prepared for him (Num 21:27), and the country to Dibon and Nophah was likewise subdued, and annexed to the kingdom of the Amorites, Num 21:30, [2.] That the Moabites were utterly disabled ever to regain the possession. Even Ar of Moab, though not taken or attempted by Sihon, but still remaining the metropolis of Moab, yet was so wasted by this loss that is would never be able to make head, Num 21:28. The Moabites were undone, and even Chemosh their god had given them up, as unable to rescue them out of the hands of Sihon, Num 21:29. By all this it appears that the Moabites' claim to this country was barred for ever. There may be a further reason for inserting this Amorite poem, namely, to show that the triumphing of the wicked is short. Those that had conquered the Moabites, and insulted over them, were now themselves conquered and insulted over by the Israel of God. It is very probable that the same Sihon, king of the Amorites, that had got this country from the Moabites, now lost it to the Israelites; for, though it is said to be taken from a former king of Moab (Num 21:26), yet not by a former king of the Amorites; and then it shows how sometimes justice makes men to see the loss of that which they got by violence, and were puffed up with the gain of. They are exalted but for a little while, Job 24:24.
II. Og king of Bashan, instead of being warned by the fate of his neighbours to make peace with Israel, is instigated by it to make war with them, which proves in like manner to be his destruction. Og was also an Amorite, and therefore perhaps thought himself better able to deal with Israel than his neighbours were, and more likely to prevail, because of his own gigantic strength and stature, which Moses takes notice of, Deu 3:11, where he gives a more full account of this story. Here observe, 1. That the Amorite begins the war (Num 21:33): He went out to battle against Israel. His country was very rich and pleasant. Bashan was famous for the best timber (witness the oaks of Bashan), and the best breed of cattle, witness the bulls and kine of Bashan, and the lambs and rams of that country, which are celebrated, Deu 32:14. Wicked men do their utmost to secure themselves and their possessions against the judgments of God, but all in vain, when their day comes, on which they must fall. 2. That God interests himself in the cause, bids Israel not to fear this threatening force, and promises a complete victory: "I have delivered him into thy hand (Num 21:34); the thing is as good as done already, it is all thy own, enter and take possession." Giants are but worms before God's power. 3. That Israel is more than a conqueror, not only routs the enemies' army, but gains the enemies' country, which afterwards was part of the inheritance of the two tribes and a half that were first seated on the other side Jordan. God gave Israel these successes, while Moses was yet with them, both for his comfort (that he might see the beginning of that glorious work, which he must not live to see the finishing of) and for the encouragement of the people in the war of Canaan under Joshua. Though this was to them in comparison but as the day of small things, yet it was an earnest of great things.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 21–35. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Numbers 21:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Numbers 21:26 serves as a crucial historical and theological footnote, clarifying the territorial claims of Israel following their decisive victory over King Sihon of the Amorites. It reveals that Heshbon, Sihon's capital, and the surrounding land extending to the Arnon River, were not original Amorite possessions but had been forcibly seized by Sihon from a previous Moabite king. This detail is pivotal, providing the divine and historical justification for Israel's subsequent occupation of the land, portraying their acquisition as a consequence of Sihon's aggression against them, rather than an unprovoked invasion of Moabite ancestral territory.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse is strategically positioned immediately after the account of Israel's overwhelming victory over Sihon, king of the Amorites, and the capture of his capital, Heshbon, as vividly recounted in Numbers 21:21-25. The preceding narrative establishes Israel's peaceful request for passage through Amorite territory, which was met with hostile aggression by Sihon, who "would not allow Israel to pass through his territory" but instead "gathered all his people together and went out against Israel in the wilderness" (Numbers 21:23). Israel's subsequent military triumph, described as striking Sihon "with the edge of the sword" and taking possession of his land from the Arnon to the Jabbok, and from the wilderness to the Amorite border (Numbers 21:24), sets the immediate stage for verse 26. This verse then functions as a vital explanatory interjection, offering the historical precedent that legitimizes Israel's claim to the newly acquired land. It clarifies that Israel was taking this territory from the Amorites, who had themselves conquered it from Moab, rather than directly from Moab, a nation Israel was commanded not to provoke (Deuteronomy 2:9). This historical detail becomes a cornerstone for defending Israel's territorial rights in later biblical narratives, notably invoked by Jephthah in Judges 11.
Historical & Cultural Context: The ancient Near East was characterized by a dynamic and often volatile geopolitical landscape, where territorial boundaries were fluid and frequently redrawn through military conquest. Kingdoms constantly expanded or contracted based on their ability to conquer and maintain control over land. Heshbon, centrally located in Transjordan, was a city of considerable strategic importance, commanding vital trade routes and offering natural defenses. The Arnon River served as a significant natural boundary, frequently contested, particularly between the Moabites to the south and various northern entities, including the Amorites. Sihon, an Amorite king, had established a dominant kingdom in the region by conquering existing territories, including those formerly held by Moab. This historical reality of conquest and re-conquest was a common feature of the era. For Israel, understanding this pre-existing chain of possession was crucial. It situated their conquest of Sihon's land within a framework of divine justice and historical precedent, distinguishing it from an unprovoked invasion of Moabite ancestral lands. This context also illuminates the practicalities of ancient warfare and the immense value placed on strategic locations like Heshbon.
Key Themes: Numbers 21:26 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Numbers and the broader Pentateuch. Firstly, it powerfully reinforces the theme of Divine Providence and Guidance, demonstrating how God orchestrates historical events, even through the conflicts and ambitions of pagan kings, to fulfill His covenant promises to Israel. Sihon's prior conquest of Moabite territory, and his subsequent aggressive refusal to grant Israel passage, ultimately served God's purpose to clear the way for Israel's inheritance of land east of the Jordan, as explicitly stated in Deuteronomy 2:30. Secondly, the verse provides Historical Justification for Israel's Conquests. By detailing Sihon's prior seizure of land from Moab, the text legitimizes Israel's claim to this territory. They were not dispossessing Moab directly, but rather taking land from an aggressor who had himself dispossessed another. This crucial nuance is vital for understanding the ethical framework of Israel's land acquisition. Finally, it illustrates the realities of Ancient Near Eastern Geopolitics and Territorial Disputes, showcasing the constant flux of power and boundaries in the region, with natural features like the Arnon River serving as critical markers of dominion and conquest.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Numbers 21:26 primarily employs Historical Narrative and Geographical Precision. The verse functions as an explanatory aside within the broader historical account of Israel's journey and conquests, providing crucial background information necessary for understanding the territorial claims. Its inclusion serves as a form of Justification or Apologia, validating Israel's acquisition of the land by demonstrating that Sihon himself was a conqueror who had dispossessed another. The explicit naming of places like Heshbon and Arnon, and peoples like the Amorites and Moabites, exemplifies Geographical Precision, grounding the narrative firmly in real-world locations and historical events, thereby enhancing its credibility and providing a clear mental map for the reader. The detail also subtly employs Foreshadowing, as this historical precedent of conquest and re-conquest will be later used by Jephthah to defend Israel's land rights against the Ammonites, who claimed to represent the Moabites (Judges 11:12-28).
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Numbers 21:26, though a seemingly minor historical detail, profoundly undergirds the theological understanding of Israel's inheritance of the land. It reveals God's meticulous and sovereign hand in orchestrating the geopolitical landscape to fulfill His covenant promises. The fact that Sihon had already conquered this land from Moab meant that Israel was not directly violating a long-standing claim of a people they were commanded not to harass (Deuteronomy 2:9). Instead, they were taking possession of territory from an aggressor who had directly opposed God's people. This highlights that God's justice operates within the complex realities of human history, using existing power dynamics to achieve His righteous ends. It underscores that the land was a divine gift, acquired not merely by human strength, but through God's providential clearing of the way, demonstrating His faithfulness to His covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
This seemingly dry historical verse offers rich spiritual lessons for believers today. It serves as a profound reminder that God is actively involved in the intricate details of history, orchestrating events, even through the conflicts and conquests of nations, to accomplish His ultimate purposes. Just as God meticulously prepared the way for Israel's inheritance by revealing the true nature of the land's ownership, He often works behind the scenes in our lives, clearing obstacles, revealing hidden truths, and arranging circumstances to bring about His good and perfect will. This truth should cultivate a deeper and more abiding trust in His sovereignty, knowing that even when we face formidable "Sihons" or seemingly insurmountable barriers, God is at work, often through means we cannot immediately perceive, to lead us into the "promised land" of His blessings and purposes. It encourages us to look beyond the immediate challenge to the greater divine plan, understanding that God's timing and methods are always perfect, leading us to our true inheritance in Him.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is this specific historical detail about Sihon's conquest of Moabite land so important for the biblical narrative?
Answer: This detail is crucially important for several reasons. First, it provides a historical justification for Israel's conquest of this particular territory. When Israel took the land from Sihon, they were not directly dispossessing the Moabites, whom they were commanded not to harass (Deuteronomy 2:9), but rather taking it from an Amorite king who had himself taken it by force from Moab. This nuance was vital for the ethical and legal framework of Israel's land claims. Second, it highlights God's sovereignty and providential timing. God used Sihon's prior conquest and his subsequent aggression against Israel to clear the way for Israel's inheritance of land east of the Jordan, demonstrating His control over the geopolitical landscape and His faithfulness to His covenant promises. Third, this detail becomes a key legal precedent later in Israel's history, notably cited by Jephthah in Judges 11:12-28 to defend Israel's territorial rights against the Ammonites, who were claiming the land.
What was the significance of Heshbon as Sihon's capital?
Answer: Heshbon was a city of immense strategic importance in Transjordan. Located on a plateau, it commanded key trade routes and offered natural defenses, making it a valuable stronghold. As Sihon's capital, its capture by Israel was not merely a territorial gain but a decisive blow to the Amorite kingdom's political and military power. Its fall symbolized the collapse of Sihon's dominion and the establishment of Israel's presence east of the Jordan River. Control of Heshbon meant control over a significant portion of the Transjordan plateau, providing Israel with a secure eastern flank as they prepared to enter Canaan. It was a vital strategic asset for any power controlling the region.
Who were the Amorites, and what was their relationship with Moab?
Answer: The Amorites were a prominent Semitic people who established significant kingdoms across Mesopotamia and the Levant in the second millennium BCE. In the biblical context, they are often depicted as formidable inhabitants of Canaan and Transjordan, representing one of the powerful groups Israel was destined to dispossess. Their relationship with Moab was one of historical conflict and territorial dispute. As Numbers 21:26 indicates, Sihon, an Amorite king, had expanded his territory at the expense of Moab, conquering land up to the Arnon River. This dynamic reflects the common geopolitical struggles and shifting boundaries characteristic of the ancient Near East, where military power often dictated territorial control and where weaker nations were frequently subsumed by stronger ones.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Numbers 21:26, though a seemingly obscure historical detail concerning ancient land disputes, resonates with profound Christ-centered implications, revealing God's meticulous preparation for His people's inheritance. Just as God providentially cleared the way for Israel to possess the physical land by allowing Sihon to first conquer it from Moab, thereby creating a legitimate basis for Israel's claim, so too does Christ clear the way for His spiritual people to inherit eternal life and spiritual blessings. We, like Israel, are called to an inheritance, not through our own might or merit, but through the decisive victory of our King. Jesus, the true Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, conquered the ultimate enemies—sin, death, and the spiritual powers that held humanity captive, disarming them triumphantly on the cross (Colossians 2:15). Our spiritual inheritance in Christ is not something we earn or seize by force; it is a gift freely given, secured by His decisive victory and resurrection (Ephesians 1:11). We enter into a "rest" and a "promised land" that is far greater than any earthly territory, a spiritual reality secured by the One who has already overcome the world (John 16:33) and has gone to prepare a place for us in His Father's house (John 14:2-3). Thus, this historical account in Numbers foreshadows the ultimate spiritual conquest and the divine provision of an eternal, glorious inheritance through Christ, our victorious King and the ultimate fulfillment of all God's promises.