Study This Verse
Commentary on Leviticus 5 verses 14–19
Hitherto in this chapter orders were given concerning those sacrifices that were both sin-offerings and trespass-offerings, for they go by both names, Lev 5:6. Here we have the law concerning those that were properly and peculiarly trespass-offerings, which were offered to atone for trespasses done against a neighbour, those sins we commonly call trespasses. Now injuries done to another may be either in holy things or in common things; of the former we have the law in these verses; of the latter in the beginning of the next chapter. If a man did harm (as it is Lev 5:16) in the holy things of the Lord, he thereby committed a trespass against the priests, the Lord's ministers, who were entrusted with the care of these holy things, and had the benefit of them. Now if a man did alienate or convert to his own use any thing that was dedicated to God, unwittingly, he was to bring this sacrifice; as suppose he had ignorantly made use of the tithes, or first-fruits, or first-born of his cattle, or (which, it should seem by Lev 22:14-16, is principally meant here) had eaten any of those parts of the sacrifices which were appropriated to the priests; this was a trespass. It is supposed to be done through mistake, or forgetfulness, for want either of care or zeal; for if it was done presumptuously, and in contempt of the law, the offender died without mercy, Heb 10:28. But in case of negligence and ignorance this sacrifice was appointed; and Moses is told, 1. What must be done in case the trespass appeared to be certain. The trespasser must bring an offering to the Lord, which, in all those that were purely trespass-offerings, must be a ram without blemish, "of the second year," say the Jewish doctors. He must likewise make restitution to the priest, according to a just estimation of the thing which he had so alienated, adding a fifth part to it, that he might learn to take more heed next time of embezzling what was sacred to God, finding to his cost that there was nothing got by it, and that he paid dearly for his oversights. 2. What must be done in case it were doubtful whether he had trespassed or no; he had cause to suspect it, but he wist it not (Lev 5:17), that is, he was not very certain; in this case, because it is good to be sure, he must bring his trespass-offering, and the value of that which he feared he had embezzled, only he was not to add the fifth part to it. Now this was designed to show the very great evil there is in sacrilege. Achan, that was guilty of it presumptuously, died for it; so did Ananias and Sapphira. But this goes further to show the evil of it, that if a man had, through mere ignorance, and unwittingly, alienated the holy things, nay, if he did but suspect that he had done so, he must be at the expense, not only of a full restitution with interest, but of an offering, with the trouble of bringing it, and must take shame to himself, by making confession of it; so bad a thing is it to invade God's property, and so cautious should we be to abstain from all appearances of this evil. We are also taught here to be jealous over ourselves with a godly jealousy, to ask pardon for the sin, and make satisfaction for the wrong, which we do but suspect ourselves guilty of. In doubtful cases we should take and keep the safer side.
Continue studying Leviticus 5:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Leviticus 5:18 meticulously outlines the provision for a trespass offering required for an unintentional sin committed in ignorance, where the individual was genuinely unaware of their transgression. This specific law underscores God's absolute holiness, which holds individuals accountable for all sin—whether known or unknown—while simultaneously demonstrating His profound mercy in establishing a clear pathway for atonement and forgiveness through the divinely prescribed sacrificial system. It profoundly illustrates the pervasive nature of human fallenness and the comprehensive scope of divine grace in reconciling humanity to a holy God.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Leviticus 5:18 employs several literary devices to convey its profound theological message. Repetition of the concept of "ignorance" or "not knowing" (through the Hebrew terms shᵉgâgâh, shâgag, and yâdaʻ) emphatically highlights the unique category of sin being addressed, underscoring God's comprehensive provision for all human failings, even those beyond conscious awareness. Symbolism is central, with the "ram without blemish" serving as a potent symbol of the perfect, unblemished sacrifice required to cover human imperfection and sin, foreshadowing a greater, ultimate sacrifice. The act of "atonement" itself is symbolic of a covering or purging, illustrating God's merciful initiative to bridge the chasm created by sin. Furthermore, there is an implicit contrast between sins committed knowingly and those committed unknowingly (as addressed in other parts of Leviticus 5), which serves to magnify the depth of God's grace and the pervasive reach of His law, demonstrating that His holiness demands a response to all forms of sin, regardless of the offender's awareness.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Leviticus 5:18 unveils a profound aspect of God's character: His absolute holiness demands a response to all sin, yet His infinite mercy provides a pathway for reconciliation even for those transgressions committed unknowingly. This passage teaches that sin's guilt is inherent in the act, not solely dependent on human consciousness or intention. It underscores the pervasive nature of human fallenness, where even our best efforts can fall short of God's perfect standard, leading to unintentional and unknown breaches of His law. This comprehensive provision for unknown sins prefigures the ultimate, all-encompassing atonement that would be provided in the person and work of Jesus Christ, who perfectly satisfied the demands of God's justice for all sin, known and unknown.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Leviticus 5:18 serves as a powerful and humbling reminder of the depth of God's holiness and the pervasive nature of sin, extending even into the unconscious aspects of our lives. It challenges our modern tendency to excuse actions based on ignorance, revealing that sin, regardless of awareness, creates a breach in our relationship with a perfectly holy God. This truth should cultivate a profound sense of humility within us, acknowledging that our righteousness is never based on our perfect knowledge or flawless performance, but entirely on God's gracious provision. It invites us to live in constant reliance on His mercy, trusting that His grace extends to cover not only our known transgressions but also every hidden fault and unconscious shortcoming. This passage fosters a deeper appreciation for the comprehensive nature of God's redemptive plan, prompting us to walk in greater reverence and dependence upon Him, knowing that He has made full provision for all our failings, ensuring our standing before Him is secure through His initiative, not our own.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What is the difference between a sin offering (chatta't) and a trespass offering (asham)?
Answer: While both the sin offering (chatta't) and the trespass offering (asham) dealt with unintentional sins, their specific applications and theological emphases differed. The sin offering primarily addressed sins that caused ritual impurity or defiled the Tabernacle and its holy things, focusing on cleansing and purification to restore the individual's purity before God. The trespass offering, as seen in Leviticus 5:14-19, specifically dealt with offenses against God's holy things (e.g., inadvertently withholding tithes or firstfruits) or against the property or rights of another person. A key distinction was that the asham often involved an element of restitution or compensation in addition to the sacrifice, emphasizing the incurred debt or liability of the offense. Thus, while both provided atonement, the chatta't focused on defilement and purification, and the asham on guilt, liability, and reparation.
Why would God require atonement for sins a person "wist not" (did not know)?
Answer: God's requirement for atonement for unknown sins, as described in Leviticus 5:18, underscores several profound theological truths. Firstly, it highlights God's absolute holiness and the pervasive nature of sin. Sin is not merely a conscious act of rebellion but also any deviation from God's perfect standard, whether by commission or omission. Even unknown transgressions violate His perfect law and disrupt the harmony of His creation, thus incurring guilt. Secondly, it demonstrates God's comprehensive grace and mercy. Knowing that humans are fallible and prone to error, even unknowingly, God provided a means for reconciliation for all types of sin. This provision ensured that His people could maintain a right relationship with Him, not based on their perfect awareness or performance, but on His divine provision for their shortcomings. It teaches that true righteousness comes from God's initiative and provision, not from human perfection.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Leviticus 5:18, with its meticulous provision for sins committed in ignorance, serves as a profound foreshadowing of the all-encompassing and perfect work of Jesus Christ. The "ram without blemish" required for the trespass offering finds its ultimate fulfillment in Christ, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, who was Himself "without blemish and without spot" (1 Peter 1:19). While the Levitical priest made atonement for specific, even unknown, errors, Jesus, as our great High Priest, offered Himself as the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice for all sin (Hebrews 9:26). His atoning blood covers not only our known transgressions but also every hidden fault and unconscious sin, providing a complete and eternal forgiveness that animal sacrifices could never achieve (Hebrews 10:4). Through faith in Him, we are fully reconciled to God, our guilt removed, and our relationship restored, not based on our awareness of every sin, but on His perfect and comprehensive redemption (Colossians 1:13-14). He is the ultimate "estimation" and satisfaction for all our trespasses, known and unknown, making us perfectly righteous before God (2 Corinthians 5:21).