Leviticus 3:6

Translation
King James Version
¶ And if his offering for a sacrifice of peace offering unto the LORD be of the flock; male or female, he shall offer it without blemish.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And if his offering H7133 for a sacrifice H2077 of peace offering H8002 unto the LORD H3068 be of the flock H6629; male H2145 or female H5347, he shall offer H7126 it without blemish H8549.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"'If his offering for a sacrifice of peace offerings to ADONAI is from the flock, then, when he offers it, no matter whether it is male or female, it must be without defect.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
If, however, one’s peace offering to the LORD is from the flock, he must present a male or female without blemish.
Ask
American Standard Version
And if his oblation for a sacrifice of peace-offerings unto Jehovah be of the flock; male or female, he shall offer it without blemish.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
“‘If his offering for a sacrifice of peace offerings to the LORD is from the flock; male or female, he shall offer it without defect.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Also if his oblation be a peace offring vnto the Lord out of ye flocke, whether it be male or female, he shall offer it without blemish.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`And if his offering is out of the flock for a sacrifice of peace-offerings to Jehovah, male or female, a perfect one he doth bring near;
Ask
See also
Isaiah 60:7Galatians 4:4Ephesians 2:13Ephesians 2:22Leviticus 1:10Leviticus 3:1Leviticus 3:17
In the KJVVerse 2,785 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Leviticus 3:6 provides specific instructions for the peace offering (also known as the fellowship offering) when the animal is sourced from the flock. It stipulates that the offering may be either male or female, but critically, it must be presented to the LORD "without blemish." This verse underscores the divine standard of perfection required for all sacrifices, emphasizing the worshiper's devotion and the purity necessary for communion with a holy God, while also highlighting the unique flexibility of the peace offering in terms of the animal's gender, making this act of communal worship broadly accessible.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Leviticus 3 is strategically placed within the initial section of the book (chapters 1-7), which meticulously details the various types of offerings commanded by God for the Israelite worship system. Following the burnt offering in Leviticus 1 (a whole burnt offering signifying complete devotion and atonement) and the grain offering in Leviticus 2 (a non-bloody offering of gratitude and sustenance), the peace offering in Leviticus 3 stands out due to its unique communal aspect. Unlike other sacrifices where the offering was entirely consumed by fire or primarily by priests, a significant portion of the peace offering was returned to the worshiper and priests for a shared meal, symbolizing fellowship and reconciliation. Verses 1-5 detail the peace offering from the herd (cattle), while verses 6-11 specifically address offerings from the flock (sheep and goats), with verse 6 serving as the foundational instruction for this category before delving into specific requirements for sheep in Leviticus 3:7-8 and goats in Leviticus 3:12-14. The chapter concludes with a prohibition against eating fat or blood in Leviticus 3:16-17, reinforcing the sanctity of life and God's exclusive portion.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East, communal meals were profoundly significant, serving as powerful symbols of covenant, reconciliation, and the establishment of close relationships. The peace offering, known in Hebrew as shelamim (from shalom, meaning "peace," "wholeness," or "well-being"), perfectly embodied this concept. It was unique among the Levitical sacrifices because it culminated in a shared meal, where the worshiper partook of the sacrificial meat alongside the priests and their families, after God's portion (the fat) had been offered on the altar. This communal act underscored a state of peace and harmonious fellowship between God and His people, a tangible expression of their reconciled relationship. The universal requirement for an animal to be "without blemish" (Hebrew: tamim) was not merely an aesthetic preference but a deeply ingrained standard across ancient cultic practices, signifying the offering of one's absolute best to the deity. It reflected the belief that only perfect, unblemished offerings were worthy of a holy God and could effectively mediate between the human and divine realms, demonstrating both the worshiper's reverence and the divine standard of purity. The flexibility of offering either a male or female animal from the flock, unlike some other sacrifices that strictly required a male, highlights the accessibility and broad applicability of the peace offering, allowing individuals from various economic strata to participate in this vital act of communal worship and thanksgiving.
  • Key Themes: Leviticus 3:6 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Leviticus and the Pentateuch. The primary theme is Holiness and Purity, as evidenced by the strict requirement for an animal to be "without blemish," underscoring that a holy God demands purity and perfection from those who approach Him. This theme resonates throughout the book, from the call for a holy priesthood to the laws governing daily life, all designed to set Israel apart as a holy nation (Leviticus 11:44-45). Another crucial theme is Fellowship and Reconciliation, particularly highlighted by the nature of the peace offering itself. The shared meal aspect of the shelamim vividly portrays God's desire for intimate communion with His people, a relationship characterized by shalom—wholeness and well-being. This contrasts with sin offerings, which primarily addressed broken fellowship, emphasizing that the peace offering celebrated an existing state of peace. Furthermore, the verse subtly introduces the theme of Accessibility and Inclusivity in worship, as the allowance for either male or female animals from the flock made this significant offering available to a broader segment of the Israelite population, ensuring that economic status did not bar individuals from participating in this act of thanksgiving and communal worship with God.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Peace Offering (Hebrew, shelem', H8002): Derived from the root shalom, meaning "peace," "wholeness," or "completeness," this term denotes a voluntary sacrifice offered in thanks or for the fulfillment of a vow, signifying a state of harmonious relationship and well-being with God. Unlike offerings for specific sins, the shelem celebrates an existing state of peace and fellowship, culminating in a shared meal between God (symbolically), the priests, and the worshiper, emphasizing reconciliation and communion.
  • Flock (Hebrew, tsôʼn', H6629): This collective noun refers to a group of small cattle, specifically sheep or goats, distinguishing them from larger herd animals like cattle (mentioned in Leviticus 3:1). The inclusion of animals from the flock indicates the accessibility of the peace offering to a wider range of economic classes within Israel, ensuring that individuals of varying means could participate in this significant act of worship and thanksgiving.
  • Without Blemish (Hebrew, tâmîym', H8549): This crucial adjective signifies "entire," "complete," "sound," or "perfect." When applied to sacrificial animals, it means free from any physical defect, disease, or imperfection that would render it unacceptable for presentation to God. This standard was not merely ceremonial; it carried profound theological weight, symbolizing the purity and perfection required to approach a holy God and reflecting the worshiper's commitment to offering their absolute best, demonstrating reverence and devotion.

Verse Breakdown

  • "¶ And if his offering for a sacrifice of peace offering unto the LORD": This opening clause establishes the specific context of the instruction: it pertains to a voluntary offering, the shelamim or peace offering, which is presented directly "unto the LORD." This emphasizes the sacred nature of the act and the divine recipient, distinguishing it from common secular meals or offerings to pagan deities. The conditional "if" underscores that this is a freewill offering, not a mandatory one, highlighting the worshiper's initiative in seeking fellowship with God.
  • "[be] of the flock;": This phrase specifies the permissible source of the animal for this particular peace offering. Following the preceding verses that detailed offerings from cattle, this clause now directs attention to smaller livestock—sheep or goats. This provision made the peace offering more broadly accessible, as animals from the flock were generally more common and less costly than those from the herd, thereby enabling a wider spectrum of Israelites to participate in this significant act of worship and communal fellowship.
  • "male or female,": This is a distinctive and flexible requirement for the peace offering. Unlike the burnt offering or certain sin offerings, which often mandated a male animal, the peace offering allowed for either gender. This flexibility further broadened participation, indicating that the intrinsic value of the offering lay not in the gender of the animal but in its unblemished quality and the sincere heart of the worshiper. It also subtly suggests the comprehensive nature of the peace and fellowship being celebrated, available to all.
  • "he shall offer it without blemish.": This concluding, non-negotiable stipulation is a universal requirement for all acceptable sacrifices. The animal presented must be tamim, meaning it must be perfect, whole, and entirely free from any physical defect or imperfection. This stricture served as a constant and tangible reminder of God's absolute holiness and the pristine purity required for anyone to approach Him. It ensured that the offering was of the highest possible quality, demonstrating the worshiper's profound reverence and the sacredness of the sacrificial act.

Literary Devices

Leviticus 3:6 employs several literary devices to convey its precise instructions and underlying theological significance. Specificity is a dominant feature, as the text meticulously details the permissible source ("of the flock") and gender ("male or female") for the peace offering, ensuring absolute clarity and precision in ritual practice. This legalistic exactitude is characteristic of the book of Leviticus, which functions as a divine instruction manual for Israel's worship and holy living. Symbolism is deeply embedded within the requirements, particularly in the mandate for the animal to be "without blemish." This physical perfection symbolizes the spiritual purity, wholeness, and moral integrity required for communion with a holy God, and by extension, the absolute perfection of the ultimate sacrifice that would one day be offered. The very act of offering from the "flock" also carries symbolic weight, representing the accessibility of peace and fellowship to all, regardless of their economic standing, as sheep and goats were common livestock available to most households. Furthermore, the entire system of sacrifices, including the peace offering, functions as a profound foreshadowing, pointing forward to the perfect, ultimate sacrifice of Jesus Christ, who would truly bring peace and reconciliation between God and humanity.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Leviticus 3:6, though rooted in ancient ritual law, communicates profound and enduring theological truths about the character of God, the nature of worship, and the pathway to peace. It reveals God as supremely holy, demanding perfection from those who seek to approach Him, yet simultaneously gracious, providing a means for intimate fellowship and communion. The "without blemish" requirement underscores the timeless principle that authentic worship involves offering our absolute best to God, a tangible demonstration of reverence, devotion, and recognition of His supreme worthiness. The peace offering, with its unique shared meal, beautifully illustrates God's fervent desire for intimate relationship and harmonious fellowship with His people—a relationship built on reconciliation, mutual enjoyment, and shared shalom. This ancient practice serves as a powerful foreshadowing of the ultimate peace and communion made possible through Christ, reminding believers that our peace with God is not earned through our imperfect efforts but freely received through a perfect, divine sacrifice.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The detailed instructions for the peace offering in Leviticus 3:6 invite us to deeply reflect on the nature of our relationship with God and the quality of our offering to Him in the present age. While the New Covenant has superseded animal sacrifices, the underlying principles remain eternally relevant and spiritually profound. The divine demand for an "unblemished" offering challenges us to consider what "without blemish" truly means for our worship, service, and daily lives today. Are we offering God our half-hearted efforts, our leftovers, or are we striving to give Him our very best—our time, talents, resources, affections, and obedience—in a way that genuinely reflects His supreme worthiness and our heartfelt devotion? The peace offering's profound emphasis on fellowship reminds us of the invaluable gift of communion with God and with fellow believers. It calls us to actively cultivate these relationships, seeking reconciliation where there is division, extending forgiveness, and joyfully celebrating the profound peace we share in Christ. Our worship should be a vibrant and sincere expression of gratitude for this peace, a joyful participation in the spiritual feast God has graciously provided through His Son.

Questions for Reflection

  • What does "without blemish" mean for my worship and service to God in the New Covenant era, and how can I practically apply this principle?
  • How can I cultivate a deeper sense of peace and harmonious fellowship with God and with others in my daily life, reflecting the spirit of the peace offering?
  • In what specific areas of my life might I be offering God less than my "best," and what concrete steps can I take to rectify this and offer Him the devotion He deserves?

FAQ

Why was the peace offering unique in allowing both male and female animals?

Answer: The allowance of both male and female animals for the peace offering (as seen in Leviticus 3:6 and Leviticus 3:12) was a distinctive feature compared to other sacrifices, such as the burnt offering (Leviticus 1:3 or Leviticus 1:10), which often specified a male animal. This flexibility underscored the nature of the peace offering as a freewill or thanksgiving offering, emphasizing the worshiper's sincere heart and the inherent quality of the animal ("without blemish") over its gender. Furthermore, it made the offering more broadly accessible to a wider range of Israelites, as female animals were often kept for breeding and milk production, making them economically valuable. This inclusivity ensured that more people could participate in the communal meal and express their fellowship and gratitude to God, regardless of their specific livestock holdings.

What was the significance of the shared meal aspect of the peace offering?

Answer: The shared meal was the most distinctive and theologically rich feature of the peace offering, setting it apart from other sacrifices where the animal was entirely consumed by fire on the altar or primarily by the priests. After the fat and specific internal organs were offered to the LORD on the altar (Leviticus 3:16), the breast was given to the priests and the right thigh to the officiating priest (Leviticus 7:31-34), while the remaining meat was returned to the worshiper and their family and friends to be eaten within a specific timeframe (Leviticus 7:15-18). This communal meal symbolized a profound state of peace, reconciliation, and intimate fellowship between God (who received His portion), the mediating priests, and the worshiper. In ancient Near Eastern cultures, sharing a meal was a powerful sign of covenant, trust, and close relationship, signifying that peace had been established and was being joyfully enjoyed. It was a tangible expression of the shalom (wholeness, well-being, harmony) that the offering represented, celebrating a restored or affirmed relationship with the divine.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Leviticus 3:6, with its specific instructions for a "peace offering" from the "flock" that must be "without blemish," finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The stringent requirement for an unblemished animal profoundly foreshadows the sinless perfection of Jesus, who is uniquely described as the Lamb of God without spot or blemish, entirely pure and holy, making Him the only acceptable and efficacious sacrifice for humanity's sin (Hebrews 9:14). He is the true and final "peace offering" (Ephesians 2:14), whose sacrificial death on the cross perfectly reconciled us to God, transforming a state of enmity into one of profound peace and intimate fellowship (Romans 5:1). The communal aspect of the Old Testament peace offering, where the worshiper shared a meal, is beautifully echoed in the New Covenant through the Lord's Supper (Holy Communion), where believers partake in a meal that symbolizes our shared peace and communion with Christ and with one another, looking back at His perfect sacrifice and forward to the glorious marriage supper of the Lamb. Jesus, the perfect sacrifice from God's own "flock" (John 10:11), has ushered in an eternal covenant of peace, allowing us to draw near to God with confidence, not through animal offerings, but through the cleansing power of His own precious blood.

Copy as

Commentary on Leviticus 3 verses 6–17

Directions are here given concerning the peace-offering, if it was a sheep or a goat. Turtle-doves or young pigeons, which might be brought for whole burnt offerings, were not allowed for peace-offerings, because they have no fat considerable enough to be burnt upon the altar; and they would be next to nothing if they were to be divided according to the law of the peace-offerings. The laws concerning a lamb or goat offered for a peace offering are much the same with those concerning a bullock, and little now occurs here; but, 1. The rump of the mutton was to be burnt with the fat of the inwards upon the altar, the whole rump (Lev 3:9), because in those countries it was very fat and large. Some observe from this that, be a thing ever so contemptible, God can make it honourable, by applying it to his service. Thus God is said to give more abundant honour to that part which lacked, Co1 12:23, Co1 12:24. 2. That which was burnt upon the altar is called the food of the offering, Lev 3:11, Lev 3:16. It fed the holy fire; it was acceptable to God as our food is to us; and since in the tabernacle God did, as it were, keep house among them, by the offerings on the altar he kept a good table, as Solomon in his court, Kg1 4:22, etc. 3. Here is a general rule laid down, that all the fat is the Lord's (Lev 3:16), and a law made thereupon, that they should eat neither fat nor blood, no, not in their private houses, Lev 3:17. (1.) As for the fat, it is not meant of that which is interlarded with the meat (that they might eat, Neh 8:10), but the fat of the inwards, the suet, which was always God's part out of the sacrificed beasts; and therefore they must not eat of it, no, not out of the beasts that they killed for their common use. Thus would God preserve the honour of that which was sacred to himself. They must not only not feed upon that fat which was to be the food of the altar, but not upon any like it, lest the table of the Lord (as the altar is called), if something were not reserved peculiar to it, should become contemptible, and the fruit thereof, even its meat, contemptible, Mal 1:7, Mal 1:12. (2.) The blood was universally forbidden likewise, for the same reason that the fat was, because it was God's part of every sacrifice. The heathen drank the blood of their sacrifices; hence we read of their drink-offerings of blood, Psa 16:4. But God would not permit the blood, that made atonement, to be used as a common thing (Heb 10:29), nor will he allow us, though we have the comfort of the atonement made, to assume to ourselves any share in the honour of making it. He that glories, let him glory in the Lord, and to his praise let all the blood be poured out.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–17. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Leviticus 3:6 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.