Skip to content
“Regulations for the Confirmed Leper”· Leviticus 13:45–46
Translation
King James Version
All the days wherein the plague shall be in him he shall be defiled; he is unclean: he shall dwell alone; without the camp shall his habitation be.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
All the days H3117 wherein the plague H5061 shall be in him he shall be defiled H2930; he is unclean H2931: he shall dwell H3427 alone H910; without H2351 the camp H4264 shall his habitation H4186 be.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
As long as he has sores, he will be unclean; since he is unclean, he must live in isolation; he must live outside the camp.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
As long as he has the infection, he remains unclean. He must live alone in a place outside the camp.
Ask
American Standard Version
All the days wherein the plague is in him he shall be unclean; he is unclean: he shall dwell alone; without the camp shall his dwelling be.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
All the days in which the plague is in him he shall be unclean. He is unclean. He shall dwell alone. Outside of the camp shall be his dwelling.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
As long as the disease shall be vpon him, he shalbe polluted, for he is vncleane: he shall dwell alone, without the campe shall his habitation be.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
all the days that the plague is in him he is unclean; he is unclean, alone he doth dwell, at the outside of the camp is his dwelling.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 3,099 of 31,102 · 10.0%

Study This Verse

Summary

Leviticus 13:46 establishes the severe regulations for individuals afflicted with a persistent, contagious skin disease, often referred to as "leprosy," within ancient Israel. This verse mandates their complete and enduring isolation, declaring them ritually "unclean" and requiring them to dwell in solitude outside the communal camp. This strict separation served a dual purpose: to prevent the spread of physical contagion and, more profoundly, to safeguard the ritual purity and holiness of the Israelite community, which was consecrated by the indwelling presence of God in their midst.

Context

Literary Context

Leviticus 13:46 is situated within a highly detailed and prescriptive section of the Torah, specifically Leviticus chapters 13 and 14, which meticulously outlines laws concerning various skin diseases (Hebrew nega' tzara'at), mildew in garments and houses, and bodily discharges. These chapters provide comprehensive instructions for the priests, who acted as diagnosticians, public health officials, and spiritual arbiters, on how to identify, quarantine, and ultimately declare individuals or objects clean or unclean. The preceding verses in Leviticus 13:1-45 detail the specific signs, diagnostic procedures, and priestly pronouncements that lead directly to the declaration of uncleanness and the subsequent isolation mandated in verse 46. Following this, Leviticus 14 describes the elaborate purification rites necessary for someone who has been healed, enabling their reintegration into the community and access to the Tabernacle. This entire legal corpus underscores the pervasive theme of purity and impurity, which is central to the book of Leviticus and dictates access to God's holy presence and participation in the covenant community.

Historical & Cultural Context

In ancient Israel, the concept of "uncleanness" (Hebrew ṭāmē') was primarily a ritual state, not a moral judgment, that rendered an individual temporarily unfit for participation in the community's sacred life, particularly worship and interaction with the Tabernacle. The Israelite camp was meticulously organized around the Tabernacle, the dwelling place of Yahweh, at its geographical and spiritual center. This arrangement symbolized God's holy presence among His people, necessitating the maintenance of the camp in a state of ritual purity. Diseases like the one described in Leviticus 13 were understood not merely as physical ailments but as conditions that could introduce ritual defilement into this holy space. The command to dwell "without the camp" was therefore both a practical measure for public health, serving as an ancient form of quarantine to prevent contagion, and a profound theological statement. It ensured that the holy space of the camp, where God's glory resided, remained undefiled. This strict separation also highlighted the precariousness of human existence in the presence of a holy God, emphasizing the need for divine provision for cleansing and restoration, as further elaborated in the regulations found in Numbers 5:2-4.

Key Themes

Leviticus 13:46 contributes significantly to several major theological and narrative themes within the book of Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Foremost is the theme of Holiness and Purity, emphasizing God's absolute holiness and His demand that His people reflect that holiness in their lives and communal practices. The stringent purity laws, including those for skin diseases, delineate the boundaries between the holy and the common, the clean and the unclean, which are foundational to Israel's covenant relationship with God (as seen in Leviticus 11:44-45). Another key theme is Separation for Sanctification, where physical separation (like dwelling "without the camp") symbolizes spiritual separation from anything that defiles God's presence. This also ties into the theme of Atonement and Cleansing, as the very existence of such strict laws necessitated a system of purification and sacrifice for the restoration of the unclean, foreshadowing the ultimate cleansing provided through Christ. Finally, the verse speaks to the theme of Community and Covenant, highlighting how individual purity contributes to the collective sanctity of the nation, enabling God to dwell securely in their midst.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Plague נֶגַע, nega' H5061

This term, derived from an unused root meaning "to strike" or "to touch," literally signifies a "blow" or "infliction." In the context of Leviticus, nega' specifically refers to a divinely permitted or sent affliction, particularly a severe skin condition. While often translated as "leprosy," the biblical nega' encompasses a broader range of dermatological issues than modern Hansen's disease. Its usage here emphasizes that the affliction was viewed not merely as a physical malady but as a condition with profound ritual and spiritual implications, requiring priestly discernment and intervention rather than purely medical treatment.

Defiled/Unclean טָמֵא, ṭâmê'

This word describes a state of ritual impurity that renders an individual unfit to approach God or participate in the sacred life of the community. It is distinct from moral sin, though often associated with conditions that signify death, decay, or a departure from the life-giving order of creation. To be ṭāmē' meant one was temporarily unfit to enter the Tabernacle or engage in sacred communal activities. This state was considered contagious, meaning contact could transmit impurity, thus necessitating strict separation to protect the holiness of the camp and the integrity of the covenant.

Without חֻוּץ, chûwts H2351

This word, meaning "outside" or "outdoors," is used here in the phrase "without the camp." It denotes a physical location beyond the consecrated boundaries of the Israelite encampment. Symbolically, this spatial exclusion represented a profound state of separation from the holy community and, by extension, from the immediate presence of God, whose Tabernacle was centrally located within the camp. This physical banishment underscored the severe impact of ritual impurity on one's relationship with God and the covenant community, emphasizing the absolute necessity of maintaining the sanctity of the divine dwelling place.

Verse Breakdown

"All the days wherein the plague [shall be] in him he shall be defiled; he [is] unclean:"

This initial clause establishes the duration and nature of the afflicted individual's state. The uncleanness is not a temporary, fleeting condition, like that incurred from touching a dead body, but persists for the entire duration that the visible affliction is present. The deliberate repetition of "defiled" and "unclean" (both from the same Hebrew root ṭāmē') serves to emphasize the comprehensive, pervasive, and absolute nature of this ritual state, leaving no ambiguity about its profound significance in the eyes of God and the community. It underscores the complete separation from ritual purity.

"he shall dwell alone;"

This command mandates complete social isolation for the afflicted person. They were to be cut off from their family, friends, and the communal life of the Israelite camp. This enforced solitude was a direct and necessary consequence of their defiled state, serving both to prevent the spread of the physical disease and, more importantly, to contain the ritual impurity. It highlights the severity of the condition and its devastating impact on the individual's social, emotional, and spiritual standing within the covenant community.

"without the camp [shall] his habitation [be]."

This final clause specifies the precise geographical and symbolic location of isolation. Being "without the camp" meant being physically outside the consecrated space where God dwelt among His people. It was a place of exclusion, symbolizing separation from the holy and the clean. This physical banishment served as a constant, visible reminder of the gravity of ritual impurity and the absolute necessity of maintaining the sanctity of the covenant community, which was God's dwelling place on earth.

Literary Devices

Leviticus 13:46 employs several potent literary devices to convey its message with clarity and force. The Repetition of the concept of uncleanness ("defiled," "unclean") serves to underscore the pervasive and absolute nature of the afflicted individual's ritual status, leaving no room for ambiguity. The phrase "without the camp" functions as powerful Symbolism, representing not merely physical distance but a profound spiritual and communal exclusion from the holy presence of God and His people. This spatial separation also acts as a Metaphor for the spiritual alienation that sin brings between humanity and a holy God. The entire verse is characterized by precise Legal Language, which is typical of Leviticus, being prescriptive, authoritative, and leaving no room for interpretation regarding the required actions. Furthermore, the stark contrast between "within" and "without" the camp creates a clear sense of Binary Opposition, highlighting the absolute divide between purity and impurity, holiness and defilement, which was central to Israel's covenant life.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Leviticus 13:46 vividly illustrates the profound theological principle of God's absolute holiness and His unwavering demand for purity within His covenant people. The strict laws concerning the "unclean" underscore that defilement, whether ritual (as here) or moral (as with sin), cannot abide in the immediate presence of a holy God. This separation was not punitive in a moral sense but protective, safeguarding the sanctity of the community and the integrity of their relationship with Yahweh. It teaches us that sin, like ritual uncleanness, creates a barrier between humanity and God, necessitating a means of cleansing and restoration to re-enter His presence and fellowship. The Old Testament laws, while specific to ancient Israel's covenant context, thus serve as a powerful shadow, pointing to the ultimate need for a perfect cleanser who could deal with the root of all defilement: sin.

Reflection and Application

While the specific ritual laws of Leviticus 13:46 no longer apply literally to believers under the New Covenant, the underlying spiritual principles offer profound and enduring insights into the nature of sin, holiness, and community. This verse serves as a stark reminder that spiritual "uncleanness"—our sin, rebellion, and unconfessed wrongdoing—creates a chasm between us and a holy God, just as physical uncleanness separated the Israelite from the sacred camp. It prompts us to consider the seriousness with which God views anything that defiles, whether in our personal lives, our thoughts, or within the church community. This passage challenges us to examine areas of our lives that might be "unclean" in God's sight, hindering our intimate fellowship with Him and with fellow believers. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of compassion for those who are marginalized, suffering, or deemed "unclean" by society, drawing a powerful parallel to how Jesus consistently interacted with and ministered to the outcasts. As followers of Christ, we are called to be a community that not only upholds God's standards of holiness but also actively seeks to restore, heal, and include, reflecting God's redemptive heart in a fallen world.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what specific ways might spiritual "uncleanness" (e.g., unconfessed sin, unforgiveness, unholy attitudes) be separating me from God or hindering my fellowship within the Christian community today?
  2. How does the concept of being "without the camp" inform my understanding of the consequences of sin and the profound value of being "in Christ" and part of His body?
  3. What is my responsibility, as an individual believer and as part of the body of Christ, to both pursue personal holiness and extend compassion and restorative grace to those who are spiritually or physically "unclean" or marginalized in our society?
  4. How can the church today more effectively embody the principles of both divine purity and redemptive restoration, thereby reflecting God's character more fully in a world marked by brokenness and exclusion?

FAQ

Was "leprosy" in Leviticus the same as modern Hansen's disease?

No, the "plague" (Hebrew: nega') described in Leviticus 13 was a broader category of severe, persistent skin afflictions, not exclusively what is known today as Hansen's disease (leprosy). The biblical term likely encompassed various dermatological conditions, including fungal infections, psoriasis, and other severe, chronic skin disorders, which priests, not medical doctors, were tasked with diagnosing for ritual purity purposes. The primary focus was on the ritual state of "uncleanness" and its implications for communal holiness rather than a precise medical diagnosis.

What was the primary purpose of these strict isolation laws?

The isolation laws served a dual and interconnected purpose in ancient Israel. First, they functioned as a practical public health measure, acting as an ancient form of quarantine to prevent the spread of contagious diseases within the densely populated Israelite camp. More importantly, they were profoundly ritualistic and theological. The presence of God's holy Tabernacle at the center of the camp demanded a state of ritual purity from His people. Therefore, isolating the "unclean" ensured the sanctity of the community and protected it from defilement, thereby maintaining the integrity of Israel's covenant relationship with a holy God. This theological imperative is powerfully reiterated in passages like Numbers 5:2-3.

Do these Old Testament laws apply to Christians today?

Christians are not under the Mosaic Law's specific ritual requirements, including those concerning dietary laws, ceremonial purity, or animal sacrifices. The New Testament teaches that Christ fulfilled the Law, and believers are made clean through His atoning work (Romans 10:4). However, the underlying spiritual principles remain profoundly relevant. These laws teach us about God's absolute holiness, the seriousness of sin (our spiritual "uncleanness" and defilement), and the necessity of purity for true fellowship with God. They also serve as powerful foreshadowings of Christ's work in cleansing us from sin and bringing us into God's presence, as beautifully articulated in Hebrews 9:11-14.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Leviticus 13:46, with its stark and somber image of the "unclean" dwelling "without the camp," finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and redemptive work of Jesus of Nazareth. While the Old Covenant Law mandated strict separation from the defiled to maintain holiness, Jesus consistently demonstrated a radical, counter-cultural, and counter-legal approach, actively engaging with and healing those considered unclean. He famously touched the leper, an act forbidden by the Law that should have rendered Him unclean; yet, instead, His touch brought not defilement but miraculous cleansing and restoration (Matthew 8:2-3). This powerful act illustrates that Jesus possesses an inherent purity and divine authority that transcends and transforms the Old Covenant's ritual laws. Furthermore, Jesus Himself became the ultimate "unclean" one, bearing the defilement of humanity's sin and suffering "outside the camp" of Jerusalem, at Golgotha (Hebrews 13:11-12), so that we, who were spiritually defiled and alienated by our sin, might be made perfectly clean and brought into intimate fellowship with God. Through His atoning sacrifice, Christ cleanses us from all spiritual "plague" and "uncleanness" (1 John 1:7), enabling us to dwell not "without the camp" in isolation, but within the very presence of God, welcomed as adopted children into His eternal kingdom (Ephesians 2:19).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Leviticus 13:38–46. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 9 verses
Passage under commentLeviticus 13:38–46
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here,

I.Provisos that neither a freckled skin nor a bald head should be mistaken for a leprosy, Lev 13:38-41.

Every deformity must not forthwith be made a ceremonial defilement. Elisha was jeered for his bald head (Kg2 2:23); but it was the children of Bethel, that knew not the judgments of their God, who turned it to his reproach.

II.A particular brand set upon the leprosy if at any time it did appear in a bald head:

The plague is in his head, he is utterly unclean, Lev 13:44. If the leprosy of sin have seized the head, if the judgment be corrupted, and wicked principles which countenance and support wicked practices, be embraced, it is an utter uncleanness, from which few are ever cleansed. Soundness in the faith keeps the leprosy from the head, and saves conscience from being shipwrecked.

III.Directions what must be done with the convicted leper. When the priest, upon mature deliberation, had solemnly pronounced him unclean,

1.He must pronounce himself so, Lev 13:45. He must put himself into the posture of a mourner and cry, Unclean, unclean. The leprosy was not itself a sin, but it was a sad token of God's displeasure and a sore affliction to him that was under it. It was a reproach to his name, put a full stop to his business in the world, cut him off from conversation with his friends and relations, condemned him to banishment till he was cleansed, shut him out from the sanctuary, and was, in effect, the ruin of all the comfort he could have in this world. Heman, it would seem, either was a leper or alludes to the melancholy condition of a leper, Psa 88:8, etc. He must therefore,

(1.)Humble himself under the mighty hand of God, not insisting upon his cleanness when the priest had pronounced him unclean, but justifying God and accepting the punishment of his iniquity. He must signify this by rending his clothes, uncovering his head, and covering his upper lip, all tokens of shame and confusion of face, and very significant of that self-loathing and self-abasement which should fill the hearts of penitents, the language of which is self-judging. Thus must we take to ourselves the shame that belongs to us, and with broken hearts call ourselves by our own name, Unclean, unclean - heart unclean, life unclean, unclean by original corruption, unclean by actual transgression - unclean, and therefore worthy to be for ever excluded from communion with God, and all hope of happiness in him. We are all as an unclean thing (Isa 64:6) - unclean, and therefore undone, if infinite mercy do not interpose.

(2.)He must give warning to others to take heed of coming near him. Wherever he went, he must cry to those he saw at a distance, "I am unclean, unclean, take heed of touching me." Not that the leprosy was catching, but by the touch of a leper ceremonial uncleanness was contracted. Every one therefore was concerned to avoid it; and the leper himself must give notice of the danger. And this was all that the law could do, in that it was weak through the flesh; it taught the leper to cry, Unclean, unclean, but the gospel has put another cry into the lepers' mouths, Luk 17:12, Luk 17:13, where we find ten lepers crying with a loud voice, Jesus, Master, have mercy on us. The law only shows us our disease; the gospel shows us our help in Christ.

2.He must then be shut out of the camp, and afterwards, when they came to Canaan, out of the city, town, or village, where he lived, and dwell alone (Lev 13:46), associating with none but those that were lepers like himself. When king Uzziah became a leper, he was banished from his palace, and dwelt in a separate house, Ch2 26:21. And see Kg2 7:3. This typified the purity which ought to be preserved in the gospel church, by the solemn and authoritative exclusion of scandalous sinners, that hate to be reformed, from the communion of the faithful. Put away from among yourselves that wicked person, Co1 5:13.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Leviticus 13:46 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.