Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And all the people arose as one man, saying, We will not any of us go to his tent, neither will we any of us turn into his house.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And all the people H5971 arose H6965 as one H259 man H376, saying H559, We will not any H376 of us go H3212 to his tent H168, neither will we any H376 of us turn H5493 into his house H1004.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
All the people stood up in agreement and said, "None of us will go home to his tent or his house.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then all the people stood as one man and said, “Not one of us will return to his tent or to his house.
Ask
American Standard Version
And all the people arose as one man, saying, We will not any of us go to his tent, neither will we any of us turn unto his house.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
All the people arose as one man, saying, “None of us will go to his tent, neither will any of us turn to his house.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then all the people arose as one man, saying, There shall not a man of vs goe to his tent, neither any turne into his house.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And all the people rise as one man, saying, `None of us doth go to his tent, and none of us doth turn aside to his house;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Sins of the Benjaminites
Sins of the Benjaminites View full PDF
Judges and Enemies Overview
Judges and Enemies Overview View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 7,063 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Judges 20:8 powerfully captures the unprecedented and unified resolve of the Israelite tribes, who, assembled at Mizpah in response to the heinous atrocity committed in Gibeah, declared their unwavering commitment to justice. Overwhelmed by profound moral outrage and a deep sense of corporate defilement, they solemnly vowed to forgo the comfort and normalcy of their homes until the egregious evil within their covenant community was confronted and purged. This verse signifies a pivotal moment of national solidarity, setting the stage for the severe, yet necessary, confrontation that followed to uphold the sanctity of their covenant with God.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Judges 20:8 immediately follows the shocking and deeply disturbing events chronicled in Judges 19, which details the horrific gang-rape and murder of a Levite's concubine by wicked men of Gibeah, a city within the tribe of Benjamin. In an act of desperate appeal for justice and a visceral summons to the nation, the Levite dismembered her body into twelve pieces, sending one to each tribe of Israel. This gruesome act served as an undeniable, shocking testament to the unparalleled depravity that had infiltrated Israelite society. The assembly at Mizpah, described in Judges 20:1-7, represents the nation's collective, horrified response to this outrage. Verse 8, therefore, encapsulates the unanimous and resolute decision of the gathered tribes to act decisively, signaling their absolute refusal to tolerate such an abomination within their midst. It is the immediate, unified, and determined response to the Levite's shocking appeal, setting the stage for the ensuing conflict.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of Judges portrays a tumultuous period in Israel's history, characterized by a profound lack of central authority, famously summarized by the recurring refrain, "in those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes" (Judges 17:6). This era was frequently marked by tribal independence, internal strife, and a pervasive moral and spiritual decay, leading to cyclical patterns of apostasy, oppression, and divine judgment. The atrocity in Gibeah, involving a blatant violation of sacred hospitality, extreme sexual violence, and murder, represented a catastrophic breakdown of both covenantal obligations and fundamental social order. Such acts were not merely criminal offenses but were considered deeply defiling to the land and the entire nation, necessitating a corporate, communal response to restore purity and justice. Mizpah, a historically significant assembly point, was a traditional gathering place where Israel often convened for national decisions and religious assemblies, underscoring the gravity of the crisis and the solemnity of their unified commitment. The people's unified response in Judges 20:8 was particularly remarkable given the usual disunity of the period, emphasizing the extreme nature of the crime and the deep moral conviction it provoked across the tribes.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Judges and the broader Old Testament narrative. Firstly, it highlights the theme of National Unity (and its fragility), presenting a rare and striking moment of Israelite solidarity in a period typically marked by fragmentation and tribal rivalries, as evidenced in conflicts like Judges 12:1-6. This unity, however, is born out of shared moral outrage against gross sin, demonstrating that extreme depravity could, at times, galvanize a fractured people. Secondly, it emphasizes the Pursuit of Justice and Accountability. The people's solemn refusal to return home underscores their unwavering determination to see justice served and to purge evil from their midst, reflecting a core principle of God's law for Israel, as articulated in passages calling for the elimination of evil from the community, such as Deuteronomy 19:18-19. Thirdly, the verse showcases Moral Outrage and the Gravity of Sin. The horrific nature of the crime in Gibeah provoked a profound sense of shock and indignation across the tribes, leading to a unified call for accountability against the offenders. Finally, it touches upon Collective Responsibility, illustrating the understanding that an unpunished crime of this magnitude defiled the entire nation and required a corporate response to uphold the integrity of the covenant and the holiness of the land, aligning with the laws concerning defilement in Leviticus 18:24-28.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • "man" (Hebrew: אִישׁ, 'îysh): From H376, this word refers to an individual male person, but in this context, when combined with "one," it forms an idiom signifying a singular, unified entity. It emphasizes that despite the vast number of people gathered, their collective will and purpose were indistinguishable, acting as if they were a single, resolute individual. This highlights the extraordinary unanimity and shared determination among the diverse tribes.
  • "one" (Hebrew: אֶחָד, 'echâd): From H259, this numeral signifies unity or being united. In the phrase "as one man," it underscores the complete absence of dissent or division. It's not merely a majority, but a profound, singular agreement that permeated the entire assembly, indicating a rare and powerful moment of cohesive action in an era often characterized by disunity.
  • "tent" (Hebrew: אֹהֶל, 'ôhel'): From H168, this term refers to a portable dwelling, a tent, often associated with nomadic or temporary living, but also a common dwelling for families. In this context, it represents the domestic sphere, personal comfort, and the security of one's home life. Its mention alongside "house" emphasizes the complete renunciation of personal ease.
  • "house" (Hebrew: בַּיִת, bayith): From H1004, this word broadly denotes a house or dwelling, often implying a more permanent structure, but also extending to family and household. Paired with "tent," it forms a comprehensive expression for all forms of personal dwelling and the normalcy of daily existence. The refusal to return to either signifies a solemn oath and an unyielding commitment to justice, prioritizing corporate righteousness over individual comfort.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And all the people arose as one man,": This opening clause immediately conveys the extraordinary and unprecedented unity of the Israelite tribes. In a period frequently marred by tribal independence and internal strife, this collective "rising" signifies a shared, instantaneous, and resolute response to the atrocity. It highlights their unanimous agreement and determination to act decisively, transcending typical divisions and demonstrating a rare moment of national cohesion driven by moral outrage.
  • "saying, We will not any [of us] go to his tent, neither will we any [of us] turn into his house.": This declaration is a solemn, binding oath, a public and corporate pledge. By refusing to return to their "tent" or "house," the Israelites committed themselves fully and without reservation to the task of seeking justice. It signifies that they would not retreat to personal comfort, daily routines, or domestic security until the profound wickedness of Gibeah was dealt with. This commitment underscores the gravity of the offense and the deep moral conviction of the people that such evil could not be tolerated or left unpunished within the covenant community of Israel. It was a vow of sustained action and sacrifice.

Literary Devices

Judges 20:8 employs several potent literary devices to convey the depth and intensity of the Israelites' resolve. The phrase "as one man" is a powerful Idiom and a form of Hyperbole, emphasizing the unparalleled unanimity and singular purpose of the vast assembly. While not literally every single individual, it powerfully communicates the unified will of the represented tribes, underscoring the extraordinary nature of their agreement. The mention of "tent" and "house" serves as a Merism, a rhetorical device where two contrasting or complementary parts represent a whole (in this case, all forms of dwelling and, by extension, the entirety of one's normal, peaceful, domestic life). This refusal to return home also functions as a solemn Oath-Taking, signaling an unyielding commitment and a willingness to sacrifice personal comfort and safety for the sake of corporate justice. The stark contrast between the pervasive disunity described elsewhere in Judges and this sudden, unified action creates a dramatic tension, highlighting the extreme nature of the crime that could provoke such a response from a fractured nation.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Judges 20:8 profoundly illustrates the theological principle of corporate responsibility within the covenant community of Israel. The horrific sin committed by a segment of one tribe was understood to defile the entire nation, necessitating a collective response to uphold God's holiness and the integrity of the covenant. This act of unity, though tragically leading to civil war, reflects a deep-seated, albeit imperfect, understanding of God's demand for justice and the purging of evil from His people. It underscores that God's people are called to be distinct and holy, and grave sin within their borders cannot be ignored without severe consequence. The pursuit of justice here, however flawed in its execution, points to the divine standard for righteousness that Israel was continually failing to meet, highlighting their need for a perfect King and a perfect system of justice.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Judges 20:8 serves as a powerful and challenging reminder of the importance of standing united against profound injustice and moral corruption, both within the church and in the broader society. In a world where apathy, division, and self-interest often prevail, the Israelites' resolute refusal to return to their comfortable lives until justice was served offers a stark counter-narrative. It teaches us that true moral courage often demands a willingness to step out of our personal spheres of comfort and convenience to address systemic or egregious evils. For the church today, this verse calls us to a similar unity in upholding biblical truth and righteousness, to not tolerate sin within our communities, and to actively pursue justice for the vulnerable and oppressed. It challenges us to consider whether our commitment to God's standards is strong enough to disrupt our own peace and comfort for the sake of His kingdom and the purity of His people. It invites us to examine our collective resolve in confronting sin and injustice, asking if we are truly "as one man" in our pursuit of God's righteous standards.

Questions for Reflection

  • What grave injustices or moral compromises in our society or within the Christian community are we, as believers, tempted to ignore or tolerate out of a desire for personal comfort or peace?
  • How can we foster a greater sense of "one man" unity within the church to address significant moral issues, rather than allowing division or apathy to prevail?
  • What "tent" or "house" (i.e., personal comfort, security, or routine) might God be calling us to leave behind in order to pursue His justice and righteousness more fully?
  • In what ways does our pursuit of justice reflect God's character, and how can we ensure it is tempered with His grace, wisdom, and redemptive purposes?

FAQ

Why was the response of "all the people" so unified in a period often characterized by disunity in Israel?

Answer: The extreme nature of the crime committed in Gibeah—a horrific violation of hospitality, sexual violence, murder, and the subsequent dismemberment of the concubine's body—was so utterly heinous and unprecedented that it transcended typical tribal rivalries and personal interests. It was an abomination that threatened the very fabric of Israelite society and their covenant relationship with God. Such an act was seen as defiling the entire nation and challenging the core tenets of their law and morality. While the era of Judges was indeed marked by fragmentation (as highlighted in Judges 17:6), this particular atrocity was a direct affront to the foundational principles of justice and holiness that were supposed to define Israel. The unified outrage was a rare but powerful demonstration that some sins were simply too egregious to be ignored, demanding a collective and decisive response to purge the evil from their midst, as seen in the Levite's desperate appeal in Judges 19:29-30.

What does the phrase "We will not any [of us] go to his tent, neither will we any [of us] turn into his house" signify?

Answer: This declaration is a solemn and binding oath, signifying an unyielding commitment to action and a profound willingness to sacrifice. "Tent" and "house" represent the domestic sphere, personal comfort, security, and the normalcy of daily life. By refusing to return to their homes, the Israelites were publicly vowing to forgo their personal peace, routines, and comforts until the profound wickedness committed in Gibeah was addressed and justice was served. It was a corporate pledge that they would not rest or retreat until the abomination was dealt with, demonstrating an extraordinary level of moral conviction and determination. This commitment highlights the gravity of the offense and the deep-seated belief of the people that such evil could not be tolerated within the covenant community of Israel, underscoring their resolve to prioritize corporate righteousness over individual convenience, setting the stage for the dramatic conflict that followed.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Judges 20:8, with its portrayal of a unified Israel rising "as one man" to confront profound evil, powerfully, yet imperfectly, foreshadows the ultimate "one man" who would perfectly deal with sin: Jesus Christ. While the Israelites' unity was born out of outrage and tragically led to a bloody civil war that further weakened the nation, Christ's singular mission was to confront the root of all evil—sin itself—not through human warfare, but through divine sacrifice and perfect obedience. The Israelites' inability to fully purge evil from their midst, even with such resolve, points to the inadequacy of human efforts and the desperate need for a perfect King and a perfect sacrifice. Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, perfectly fulfills the need for a decisive, unified action against sin. He is the "one man" through whom righteousness is imputed to many (Romans 5:18-19). His atoning work on the cross definitively purges sin, providing true peace and rest (a spiritual "tent" and "house") for all who believe, a rest that Israel could never fully achieve through their own efforts (Hebrews 4:9-10). The church, as the body of Christ, is now called to a new kind of unity—a unity in the Spirit, bound by love and truth, empowered by grace—to proclaim His kingdom and live out His justice, looking forward to the day when all evil will be finally and completely eradicated by the returning King and the new heavens and new earth (Ephesians 4:3-6).

Copy as

Commentary on Judges 20 verses 1–11

Here is, I. A general meeting of all the congregation of Israel to examine the matter concerning the Levite's concubine, and to consider what was to be done upon it, Jdg 20:1, Jdg 20:2. It does not appear that they were summoned by the authority of any one common head, but they came together by the consent and agreement, as it were, of one common heart, fired with a holy zeal for the honour of God and Israel. 1. The place of their meeting was Mizpeh; they gathered together unto the Lord there, for Mizpeh was so very near to Shiloh that their encampment might very well be supposed to reach from Mizpeh to Shiloh. Shiloh was a small town, and therefore, when there was a general meeting of the people to represent themselves before God, they chose Mizpeh for their head-quarters, which was the next adjoining city of note, perhaps because they were not willing to give that trouble to Shiloh which so great an assembly would occasion, it being the resident of the priests that attended the tabernacle. 2. The persons that met were all Israel, from Dan (the city very lately so called, Jdg 18:29) in the north to Beersheba in the south, with the land of Gilead (that is, the tribes on the other side Jordan), all as one man, so unanimous were they in their concern for the public good. Here was an assembly of the people of God, not a convocation of the Levites and priests, though a Levite was the person principally concerned in the cause, but an assembly of the people, to whom the Levite referred himself with an Appello populum - I appeal to the people. The people of God were 400,000 footmen that drew the sword, that is, were armed and disciplined, and fit for service, and some of them perhaps such as had known the wars of Canaan, Jdg 3:1. In this assembly of all Israel, the chief (or corners) of the people (for rulers are the corner-stones of the people, that keep all together) presented themselves as the representatives of the rest. They rendered themselves at their respective posts, at the head of the thousands and hundreds, the fifties and tens, over which they presided; for so much order and government, we may suppose, at least, they had among them, though they had no general or commander-in-chief. So that here was, (1.) A general congress of the states for counsel. The chief of the people presented themselves, to lead and direct in this affair. (2.) A general rendezvous of the militia for action, all that drew sword and were men of war (Jdg 20:17), not hirelings nor pressed men, but the best freeholders, that went at their own charge. Israel were above 600,000 when they came into Canaan, and we have reason to think they were at this time much increased, rather than diminished; but then all between twenty and sixty were military men, now we may suppose more than the one half exempted from bearing arms to cultivate the land; so that these were as the trained bands. The militia of the two tribes and a half were 40,000 (Jos 4:13), but the tribes were many more.

II. Notice given to the tribe of Benjamin of this meeting (Jdg 20:3): They heard that the children of Israel had gone up to Mizpeh. Probably they had a legal summons sent them to appear with their brethren, that the cause might be fairly debated, before any resolutions were taken up upon it, and so the mischiefs that followed would have been happily prevented; but the notice they had of this meeting rather hardened and exasperated them than awakened them to think of the things that belonged to their peace and honour.

III. A solemn examination of the crime charged upon the men of Gibeah. A very horrid representation of it had been made by the report of the messengers that were sent to call them together, but it was fit it should be more closely enquired into, because such things are often made worse than really they were; a committee therefore was appointed to examine the witnesses (upon oath, no doubt) and to report the matter. It is only the testimony of the Levite himself that is here recorded, but it is probable his servant, and the old man, were examined, and gave in their testimony, for that more than one were examined appears by the original (Jdg 20:3), which is, Tell you us; and the law was that none should be put to death, much less so many, upon the testimony of one witness only. The Levite gives a particular account of the matter: that he came into Gibeah only as a traveller to lodge there, not giving the least shadow of suspicion that he designed them any ill turn (Jdg 20:4), and that the men of Gibeah, even those that were of substance among them, that should have been a protection to the stranger within their gates, riotously set upon the house where he lodged, and thought to slay him; he could not, for shame relate the demand which they, without shame, made, Jdg 19:22. They declared their sin as Sodom, even the sin of Sodom, but his modesty would not suffer him to repeat it; it was sufficient to say they would have slain him, for he would rather have been slain than have submitted to their villany; and, if they had got him into their hands, they would have abused him to death, witness what they had done to his concubine: They have forced her that she is dead, Jdg 20:5. And, to excite in his countrymen an indignation at this wickedness, he had sent pieces of the mangled body to all the tribes, which had fetched them together to bear their testimony against the lewdness and folly committed in Israel, Jdg 20:6. All lewdness is folly, but especially lewdness in Israel. For those to defile their own bodies who have the honourable seal of the covenant in their flesh, for those to defy the divine vengeance to whom it is so clearly revealed from heaven - Nabal is their name, and folly is with them. He concludes his declaration with an appeal to the judgment of the court (Jdg 20:7): You are all children of Israel, and therefore you know law and judgment, Est 1:13. "You are a holy people to God, and have a dread of every thing which will dishonour God and defile the land; you are of the same community, members of the same body, and therefore likely to feel from the distempers of it; you are children of Israel, that ought to take particular care of the Levites, God's tribe, among you, and therefore give your advice and counsel what is to be done."

IV. The resolution they came to hereupon, which was that, being now together, they would not disperse till they had seen vengeance taken upon this wicked city, which was the reproach and scandal of their nation. Observe, 1. Their zeal against the lewdness that was committed. They would not return to their houses, how much soever their families and their affairs at home wanted them, till they had vindicated the honour of God and Israel, and recovered with their swords, if it could not be had otherwise, that satisfaction for the crime which the justice of the nation called for, Jdg 20:8. By this they showed themselves children of Israel indeed, that they preferred the public interest before their private concerns. 2. Their prudence in sending out a considerable body of their forces to fetch provisions for the rest, Jdg 20:9, Jdg 20:10. One of ten, and he chosen by lot, 40,000 in all, must go to their respective countries, whence they came, to fetch bread and other necessaries for the subsistence of this great army; for when they came from home they took with them provisions only for a journey to Mizpeh, not for an encampment (which might prove long) before Gibeah. This was to prevent their scattering to forage for themselves, for, if they had done this, it would have been hard to get them all together again, especially all in so good a mind. Note, When there appears in people a pious zeal for any good work it is best to strike while the iron is hot, for such zeal is apt to cool quickly if the prosecution of the work be delayed. Let it never be said that we left that good work to be done tomorrow which we could as well have done today. 3. Their unanimity in these counsels, and the execution of them. The resolution was voted, Nemine contradicente - Without a dissenting voice (Jdg 20:8); it was one and all; and, when it was put in execution, they were knit together as one man, Jdg 20:11. This was their glory and strength, that the several tribes had no separate interests when the common good was concerned.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–11. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Judges 20:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.