Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
There was not a city that made peace with the children of Israel, save the Hivites the inhabitants of Gibeon: all other they took in battle.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
There was not a city H5892 that made peace H7999 with the children H1121 of Israel H3478, save the Hivites H2340 the inhabitants H3427 of Gibeon H1391: all other they took H3947 in battle H4421.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Not one city made peace with the people of Isra'el, except for the Hivi living in Giv'on; they took everything in battle.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
No city made peace with the Israelites except the Hivites living in Gibeon; all others were taken in battle.
Ask
American Standard Version
There was not a city that made peace with the children of Israel, save the Hivites the inhabitants of Gibeon: they took all in battle.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
There was not a city that made peace with the children of Israel, except the Hivites, the inhabitants of Gibeon. They took all in battle.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Neither was there any citie that made peace with the children of Israel, saue those Hiuites that inhabited Gibeon: all other they tooke by battell.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
there hath not been a city which made peace with the sons of Israel save the Hivite, inhabitants of Gibeon; the whole they have taken in battle;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Joshua's Conquests in the North
Joshua's Conquests in the North View full PDF
Overview of Joshua’s Conquests
Overview of Joshua’s Conquests View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 6,127 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Joshua 11:19 serves as a crucial summary statement, concluding the extensive northern campaign of Israel's conquest of Canaan and articulating the prevailing pattern of their military engagements. It emphatically declares that, with one singular and significant exception, no Canaanite city sought or established a peace treaty with the Israelites; rather, all other urban centers were decisively subdued and captured through direct military conflict, thereby reflecting Israel's general adherence to the divine mandate for total conquest and disinheritance of the land's inhabitants.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse functions as a pivotal summary, appearing at the culmination of the detailed account of Israel's northern campaign (specifically Joshua 11:1-15). It immediately follows the narrative of the decisive defeat of the powerful northern coalition led by Jabin, king of Hazor, providing a comprehensive overview of the outcome of Israel's military actions across the newly conquered territories, encompassing both the southern and northern campaigns. The statement serves to consolidate the preceding narratives of conquest before transitioning to a broader summary of Joshua's overall achievements (found in Joshua 11:16-23) and the subsequent division of the land among the tribes. Crucially, the verse draws a sharp and deliberate contrast between the general policy of total conquest and the singular, anomalous incident involving the Gibeonites, an event thoroughly detailed and explained earlier in Joshua 9.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The conquest of Canaan unfolded during the Late Bronze Age (roughly 1550-1200 BCE), a geopolitical landscape characterized by numerous independent city-states and shifting regional alliances. The indigenous Canaanite inhabitants practiced polytheistic religions that were deeply antithetical to the monotheistic worship of Yahweh, often involving abhorrent rituals such as child sacrifice, cultic prostitution, and various forms of divination, as condemned in passages like Leviticus 18:24-30. God's explicit command to Israel, reiterated forcefully in Deuteronomy 7:2 and expanded upon in Deuteronomy 20:16-18, was to utterly dispossess and destroy these nations, making no covenants or intermarriages with them. This divine directive was not merely punitive but primarily preventative, designed to safeguard Israel from the corrupting influence of pagan idolatry and immoral practices, thereby preserving their unique identity as a holy nation set apart for Yahweh. The Gibeonites, identified specifically as Hivites, were one of these indigenous groups, and their deceptive treaty stands out as a stark anomaly against the backdrop of this strict divine prohibition and Israel's general obedience.
  • Key Themes: Joshua 11:19 powerfully underscores several central themes woven throughout the book of Joshua. Firstly, it highlights the theme of Divine Mandate and Obedience, showcasing Israel's general commitment to executing God's command to dispossess the wicked Canaanite nations through "holy war." The explicit absence of peace treaties (save for the one exception) demonstrates their adherence to the divine directive to not compromise with the pervasive idolatry and wickedness of the land. Secondly, the verse emphasizes the Sovereignty and Faithfulness of God in granting comprehensive victory to Israel; the declaration that "all other they took in battle" serves as a powerful testimony to God's active presence and power, fighting on behalf of His people as promised (Joshua 10:42). This demonstrates God's unwavering commitment to fulfilling His covenant promises to give Israel the land. Lastly, the Unique Gibeonite Exception serves as a crucial narrative pivot, illustrating the significant consequences of Israel's failure to "inquire of the Lord" before making critical decisions, a lapse explicitly noted in Joshua 9:14. Despite the deception, Israel's integrity in honoring their oath, even a misguided one, is implicitly affirmed, though the Gibeonites were subsequently made perpetual servants, highlighting the sanctity of a sworn covenant.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Peace (Hebrew, shâlam', H7999): The Hebrew word "shâlam" (H7999) is a primitive root meaning "to be safe (in mind, body or estate); figuratively, to be (causatively, make) completed; by implication, to be friendly; by extension, to reciprocate (in various applications)." In this context, "made peace" (H7999, H8689 – the participle form) refers specifically to entering into a covenant or treaty that would establish a state of non-belligerence, mutual agreement, or friendly relations. The verse's assertion that no city "made peace" underscores Israel's adherence to the divine command for total disinheritance, rather than coexistence, with the Canaanite inhabitants.
  • Hivites (Hebrew, Chivvîy', H2340): The term "Chivvîy" (H2340) refers to "a villager; a Chivvite, one of the aboriginal tribes of Palestine." The specific mention of "the Hivites the inhabitants (H3427, H8802) of Gibeon (H1391)" points directly to the unique and well-known incident recorded in Joshua 9. Their explicit inclusion here highlights the singular deviation from Israel's general policy of conquest and no-treaty, making the Gibeonite situation a significant and remarkable exception to the rule established in the first clause.
  • Took (Hebrew, lâqach', H3947): The verb "lâqach" (H3947) is a primitive root meaning "to take (in the widest variety of applications); accept, bring, buy, carry away, drawn, fetch, get, infold, [idiom] many, mingle, place, receive(-ing), reserve, seize, send for, take (away, -ing, up), use, win." In the phrase "all other they took (H3947, H8804 – the perfect tense) in battle (H4421)," it signifies military conquest and subjugation. This implies that any resistance was met with decisive military action, resulting in the capture of cities and the defeat of their inhabitants. The contrast with "made peace" emphasizes that for all cities other than Gibeon, the outcome was not negotiation or coexistence, but rather a direct military confrontation leading to Israel's victory and the dispossession of the land's inhabitants.

Verse Breakdown

  • "There was not a city that made peace with the children of Israel,": This opening clause establishes the general rule and the dominant outcome of Israel's military campaigns across Canaan. It emphatically asserts that Israel did not enter into any treaties or covenants of peace with the vast majority of cities they encountered. This reflects a broad and consistent adherence to the divine command articulated in Deuteronomy 7:2 and Deuteronomy 20:16-18, which mandated the utter destruction of the land's inhabitants to prevent their idolatrous practices from corrupting God's chosen people.
  • "save the Hivites the inhabitants of Gibeon:": This clause introduces the singular, critical exception to the established general rule. The Gibeonites, through a carefully orchestrated deception, secured a peace treaty with Israel by presenting themselves as emissaries from a distant land, as meticulously detailed in Joshua 9. This exception was not divinely sanctioned but resulted directly from Israel's failure to "inquire of the Lord" before making such a significant covenant (Joshua 9:14). Despite the deceit, Israel honored their sworn oath, demonstrating the profound sanctity of a covenant in ancient Near Eastern culture, even when made under false pretenses, though the Gibeonites were subsequently made perpetual servants.
  • "all [other] they took in battle.": This concluding clause powerfully reinforces the comprehensive and decisive nature of Israel's conquest. It confirms that for every city and people group other than the Gibeonites, the outcome was direct military engagement and overwhelming victory. This phrase highlights the thoroughness and effectiveness of the campaign, testifying to the fulfillment of God's promise to deliver the land into Israel's hands through force of arms, thereby emphasizing the divine power actively at work in their numerous victories.

Literary Devices

Joshua 11:19 effectively employs several literary devices to convey its significant message. The most prominent is Contrast, which is powerfully established by juxtaposing "made peace" with "took in battle." This sharp distinction highlights the two mutually exclusive outcomes for the Canaanite cities, underscoring the decisive and uncompromising nature of the conquest and the singular deviation from this general policy. The verse also functions as a Summary Statement, providing a concise and authoritative overview of the preceding military narratives, particularly the recently concluded northern campaign. This summarization lends a sense of finality and comprehensive victory to the account, consolidating the reader's understanding of the conquest's scope. Furthermore, the explicit mention of the Gibeonite exception serves as a form of Emphasis through Exception, drawing heightened attention to the unique nature of that event and implicitly reinforcing the general rule by highlighting its singular deviation. This narrative technique ensures the reader remembers the Gibeonite incident's profound significance within the broader story of the conquest.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Joshua 11:19 encapsulates profound theological truths regarding God's character, His covenant with Israel, and the nature of His judgment. The general absence of peace treaties underscores God's absolute holiness and His uncompromising demand for His people to remain utterly separate from the corrupting influences of pagan idolatry. The conquest was not merely a territorial expansion but a divine judgment against the profound wickedness of the Canaanite nations, whose "iniquity was full" (Genesis 15:16). Israel's general obedience in this regard demonstrates their commitment to the covenant, while the Gibeonite exception serves as a stark reminder of the dangers inherent in human presumption and the critical, ongoing need for divine counsel in all matters, especially those of covenantal significance. This verse affirms God's unwavering faithfulness in delivering the land to His people, even as it subtly highlights the imperfections and occasional lapses in Israel's obedience.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Joshua 11:19, while narrating an ancient military conquest, offers enduring principles for the spiritual life of believers today. The overarching theme of Israel's general commitment to God's commands, even in the face of formidable opposition and the temptation to compromise, challenges us to critically examine our own level of obedience to God's revealed Word. The "taking in battle" of cities, while a physical reality for Israel, can be spiritually understood as the believer's ongoing and necessary struggle against sin, pervasive temptation, and the various worldly influences that seek to compromise our singular devotion to Christ. We are called to make no "peace treaties" with the spiritual enemies of our soul—the flesh, the world, and the devil—but rather to actively engage in spiritual warfare, diligently putting on the full armor of God to stand firm against evil (Ephesians 6:10-18). The Gibeonite exception, born of human error, a lack of discernment, and a failure to seek God's counsel, serves as a timeless warning about the perils of making significant decisions based solely on appearances or expediency rather than through prayerful discernment and absolute reliance on the Holy Spirit. It underscores the vital importance of seeking God's wisdom in all our choices, especially those with long-term implications for our spiritual integrity, witness, and relationship with Him. Our integrity in honoring commitments, even when made under difficult circumstances, also finds a parallel here, reminding us of the importance of keeping our word as believers.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific areas of your life might you be tempted to make "peace treaties" with worldly values, cultural norms, or sinful habits, rather than engaging in decisive spiritual "battle" against them?
  • How does the Gibeonite deception powerfully highlight the indispensable importance of seeking God's counsel through diligent prayer and faithful engagement with Scripture before making significant life decisions?
  • What specific "idols" or corrupting influences, whether in your personal life, your family, or the broader culture, might God be calling you to decisively "take in battle" and utterly dispossess rather than accommodate or tolerate?

FAQ

Why did God command Israel to destroy the inhabitants of Canaan and make no peace treaties with them?

Answer: God's command for Israel to utterly destroy the Canaanite nations and make no peace treaties with them was primarily a theological and redemptive mandate, not merely a military one. The Canaanites practiced extreme forms of idolatry, including child sacrifice, ritual prostitution, and various detestable acts that deeply offended God's holiness (Leviticus 18:24-28). Their pervasive presence and corrupting practices posed a severe spiritual threat to Israel, potentially leading God's chosen people into apostasy and defilement. The command was a divine judgment against generations of unrepentant wickedness and a preventative measure designed to preserve Israel's distinct identity as a holy nation set apart for Yahweh, ensuring they would not "learn to do according to the abominations of those nations" (Deuteronomy 18:9). It was a necessary, albeit severe, act to establish a pure land for God's covenant people, from whom the Messiah would eventually come, thereby safeguarding the lineage and context for salvation history.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Joshua 11:19 describes a physical conquest of land and peoples, its underlying principles find profound spiritual fulfillment in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. The "taking in battle" of the Canaanite cities by Israel foreshadows Christ's ultimate and decisive victory over the spiritual enemies of humanity: sin, death, and the devil. Unlike Israel's partial and imperfect conquests, Jesus achieved a complete and perfect victory through His crucifixion and glorious resurrection, triumphantly disarming the "powers and authorities" that held humanity captive (Colossians 2:15). He did not make "peace treaties" with sin or evil but utterly conquered them, offering true, eternal, and lasting "shalom"—wholeness and peace with God—to all who believe in Him (John 14:27). The establishment of Israel in the Promised Land, secured through divine power in battle, points to the spiritual kingdom of God established by Christ, into which believers are brought not by physical conquest or ethnic lineage but by spiritual new birth and faith in Him (John 3:3). The Gibeonite exception, where a people from outside Israel were unexpectedly brought into a relationship with God's covenant people (albeit as servants), can be seen as a faint but significant echo of God's surprising and sovereign grace in extending salvation to the Gentiles through Christ, bringing them into His covenant family not by merit or law but by divine initiative and faith (Ephesians 2:11-13). Ultimately, the military victories of Joshua, the earthly leader, point to the greater, eternal victory secured by the true Captain of our Salvation, Jesus Christ, who leads His redeemed people into their eternal inheritance—a heavenly kingdom of righteousness, true peace, and everlasting communion with God (Hebrews 2:10).

Copy as

Commentary on Joshua 11 verses 15–23

We have here the conclusion of this whole matter.

I. A short account is here given of what was done in four things: - 1. The obstinacy of the Canaanites in their opposition to the Israelites. It was strange that though it appeared so manifestly that God fought for Israel, and in every engagement the Canaanites had the worst of it, yet they stood it out to the last; not one city made peace with Israel, but the Gibeonites only, who understood the things that belonged to their peace better than their neighbours, Jos 11:19. It is intimated that other cities might have made as good terms for themselves, without ragged clothes and clouted shoes, if they would have humbled themselves, but they never so much as desired conditions of peace. We here are told whence this unaccountable infatuation came: It was of the Lord to harden their hearts, Jos 11:20. As Pharaoh's heart was hardened by his own pride and wilfulness first, and afterwards by the righteous judgment of God, to his destruction, so were the hearts of these Canaanites. To punish them for all their other follies, God left them to this, to make those their enemies whom they might have made their friends. This was it that ruined them: they came against Israel in battle, and gave the first blow, and therefore might have no favour shown them. Those know not what they do who give the provocation to divine justice, or the authorized instruments of it. Are we stronger than God? Observe here, That hardness of heart is the ruin of sinners. Those that are stupid and secure, and heedless of divine warnings, are already marked for destruction. What hope is there of those concerning whom God has said, Go, make their hearts fat? 2. The constancy of the Israelites in prosecuting this war (Jos 11:18): Joshua made war a long time; some reckon it five years, others seven, that were spent in subduing this land: so long God would train up Israel to war, and give them repeated instances of his power and goodness in every new victory that he gave them. 3. The conquest of the Anakim at last, Jos 11:21, Jos 11:22. Either this was done as they met with them where they were dispersed, as some think, or rather it should seem the Anakim had retired to their fastnesses, and so were hunted out and cut off at last, after all the rest of Israel's enemies. The mountains of Judah and Israel were the habitations of those mountains of men; but not their height, nor the strength of their caves, nor the difficulty of the passes to them, could secure, no, not these mighty men, from the sword of Joshua. The cutting off of the sons of Anak is particularly mentioned because these had been such a terror to the spies forty years before, and their bulk and strength had been thought an insuperable difficulty in the way of the reducing of Canaan, Num 13:28, Num 13:33. Even that opposition which seemed invincible was got over. Never let the sons of Anak be a terror to the Israel of God, for even their day will come to fall. Giants are dwarfs to Omnipotence; yet this struggle with the Anakim was reserved for the latter end of the war, when the Israelites had become more expert in the arts of war, and had had more experience of the power and goodness of God. Note, God sometimes reserves the sharpest trials of his people by affliction and temptation for the latter end of their days. Therefore let not him that girds on the harness boast as he that puts it off. Death, that tremendous son of Anak, is the last enemy that is to be encountered; but it is to be destroyed, Co1 15:26. Thanks be to God, who will give us the victory. 4. The end and issue of this long war. The Canaanites were rooted out, not perfectly (as we shall find after in the book of Judges), but in a good measure; they were not able to make any head either, (1.) So as to keep the Israelites out of possession of the land: Joshua took all that land, Jos 11:16, Jos 11:17. And we may suppose the people dispersed themselves and their families into the countries they had conquered, at least those that lay nearest to the head-quarters at Gilgal, until an orderly distribution should be made by lot, that every man might know his own. Or, (2.) So as to keep them in action, or give them any molestation (Jos 11:23): The land rested from war. It ended not in a peace with the Canaanites (that was forbidden), but in a peace from them. There is a rest, a rest from war, remaining for the people of God, into which they shall enter when their warfare is accomplished.

II. That which was now done is here compared with that which had been said to Moses. God's word and his works, if viewed and considered together, will mutually illustrate each other. It is here observed in the close, 1. That all the precepts God had given to Moses relating to the conquest of Canaan were obeyed on the people's part, at least while Joshua lived. See how solemnly this is remarked (Jos 11:15): As the Lord commanded Moses his servant, by whose hand the law was given, so did Moses command Joshua, for Moses was faithful, as a law-giver, to him that appointed him; he did his part, and then he died: but were the commands of Moses observed when he was in his grave? Yes, they were: So did Joshua, who was, in his place, as faithful as Moses in his. He left nothing undone (Heb. he removed nothing) of all that the Lord commanded Moses. Those that leave their duty undone do what they can to remove or make void the command of God, by which they are bound to do it; but Joshua, by performing the precept, confirmed it, as the expression is, Deu 27:26. Joshua was himself a great commander, and yet nothing was more his praise than his obedience. Those that rule others at their will must themselves be ruled by the divine will; then their power is indeed their honour, and not otherwise. The pious obedience for which Joshua is here commended respects especially the command to destroy the Canaanites, and to break down their altars and burn their images, Deu 7:2-5; Exo 23:24; Exo 34:13. Joshua, in his zeal for the Lord of hosts, spared neither the idols nor the idolaters. Saul's disobedience, or rather his partial obedience, to the command of God, for the utter destruction of the Amalekites, cost him his kingdom. It should seem Joshua himself gives this account of his most careful and punctual observance of his orders in the execution of his commission, that in all respects he had done as Moses commanded him; and then it intimates that he had more pleasure and satisfaction in reflecting upon his obedience to the commands of God in all this war, and valued himself more upon that, than upon all the gains and triumphs with which he was enriched and advanced. 2. That all the promises God had given to Moses relating to this conquest were accomplished on his part, Jos 11:23. Joshua took the whole land, conquered it, and took possession of it, according to all that the Lord said unto Moses. God had promised to drive out the nations before them (Exo 33:2; Exo 34:11), and to bring them down, Deu 9:3. And now it was done. There failed not one word of the promise. Our successes and enjoyments are then doubly sweet and comfortable to us when we see them flowing to us from the promise (this is according to what the Lord said), as our obedience is then acceptable to God when it has an eye to the precept. And, if we make conscience of our duty, we need not question the performance of the promise.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 15–23. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Joshua 11:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.