Genesis 37:2
“The Generations of Jacob and Joseph's Favoritism”Genesis 37:1–4
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- אֵלֶּה'E·lehtheseH428PrtParticle Demonstrative
- תֹּלְדוֹתto·le·Dot[are] [the] accounts ofH8435N-fpcNoun Plural Feminine Construct
- יַעֲקֹבya·'a·KoJacobH3290N-proper-mNoun Proper Masculine
- יוֹסֵףyo·SefJosephH3130N-proper-mNoun Proper Masculine
- בֶּןben[was] a son ofH1121N-mscNoun Singular Masculine Construct
- שְׁבַעshe·va'seven-H7651Adj-cscAdjective Numerical Singular common gender Construct
- עֶשְׂרֵה'es·RehteenH6240Adj-csAdjective Numerical Singular common gender Absolute
- שָׁנָהsha·Nahyear[s]H8141N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
- הָיָהha·Yahhe wasH1961V-Qal-Perf-3msVerb Qal Perfect 3rd Singular Masculine
- רֹעֶהro·'EhshepherdingH7462V-Qal-Prtcpl-msVerb Qal Participle Singular Masculine Absolute
- אֶת'etwithH854PrepPreposition
- אֶחָיו'e·Chavhis brothersH251N-mpc ¦ 3msNoun Plural Masculine Construct with suffixאֶחָיbrothersוhis
- בַּצֹּאןba·Tzon[in] the flockH6629Prep-b ¦ N-csNoun Singular common gender Absoluteבַּ[in] theצֹּאןflock
- וְהוּאve·Hu'and heH1931Conj-w ¦ Pro-3msPronoun Personal 3rd Singular Masculineוְandהוּאhe
- נַעַרNa·'ar[was] a youthH5288N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
- אֶת'etwithH854PrepPreposition
- בְּנֵיbe·Nei[the] sons ofH1121N-mpcNoun Plural Masculine Construct
- בִלְהָהvil·HahBilhahH1090N-proper-fNoun Proper Feminine
- וְאֶתve·'Etand withH854Conj-w ¦ PrepPrepositionוְandאֶתwith
- בְּנֵיbe·Nei[the] sons ofH1121N-mpcNoun Plural Masculine Construct
- זִלְפָּהzil·PahZilpahH2153N-proper-fNoun Proper Feminine
- נְשֵׁיne·Shei[the] wives ofH802N-mpcNoun Plural (-îm ending) Construct
- אָבִיו'a·Vivhis fatherH1N-msc ¦ 3msNoun Singular Masculine Construct with suffixאָבִיfatherוhis
- וַיָּבֵאvai·ya·Ve'and he broughtH935Conj-w ¦ V-Hiphil-ConsecImperf-3msVerb Hiphil Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוַandיָּבֵאhe brought
- יוֹסֵףyo·SefJosephH3130N-proper-mNoun Proper Masculine
- אֶת'et[obj.]H853DirObjMParticle Object Indicator
- דִּבָּתָםdi·ba·Tamtheir reportH1681N-fsc ¦ 3mpNoun Singular Feminine Construct with suffixדִּבָּתָreportםtheir
- רָעָהra·'AhbadH7451Adj-fsAdjective Singular Feminine Absolute
- אֶל'eltoH413PrepPreposition
- אֲבִיהֶם'a·vi·Hemtheir fatherH1N-msc ¦ 3mpNoun Singular Masculine Construct with suffixאֲבִיfatherהֶםtheir
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
- feeding (KJV) / tending (BSB) רָעָה
Details
See on the biblical-era maps



Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Genesis 37:1–4.
Moses has no more to say of the Edomites, unless as they happen to fall in Israel's way; but now applies himself closely to the story of Jacob's family: These are the generations of Jacob. His is not a bare barren genealogy as that of Esau (Genesis 36:1), but a memorable useful history. Here is, 1. Jacob a sojourner with his father Isaac, who has yet living, Genesis 37:1. We shall never be at home, till we come to heaven. 2. Joseph, a shepherd, feeding the flock with his brethren, Genesis 37:2. Though he was his father's darling, yet he was not brought up in idleness or delicacy. Those do not truly love their children that do not inure them to business, and labour, and mortification. The fondling of children is with good reason commonly called the spoiling of them. Those that are trained up to do nothing are likely to be good for nothing. 3. Joseph beloved by his father (Genesis 37:3), partly for his dear mother's sake that was dead, and partly for his own sake, because he was the greatest comfort of his old age; probably he waited on him, and was more observant of him than the rest of his sons; he was the son of the ancient so some; that is, when he was a child, he was as grave and discreet as if he had been an old man, a child, but not childish. Jacob proclaimed his affection to him by dressing him finer than the rest of his children: He made him a coat of divers colours, which probably was significant of further honors intended him. Note, Though those children are happy that have that in them which justly recommends them to their parents' particular love, yet it is the prudence of parents not to make a difference between one child and another, unless there be a great and manifest cause given for it by the children's dutifulness or undutifulness; paternal government must be impartial, and managed with a steady hand. 4. Joseph hated by his brethren, (1.) Because his father loved him; when parents make a difference, children soon take notice of it, and it often occasions feuds and quarrels in families. (2.) Because he brought to his father their evil report. Jacob's sons did that, when they were from under his eye, which they durst not have done if they had been at home with him; but Joseph gave his father an account of their bad carriage, that he might reprove and restrain them; not as a malicious tale-bearer, to sow discord, but as a faithful brother, who, when he durst not admonish them himself, represented their faults to one that had authority to admonish them. Note, [1.] It is common for friendly monitors to be looked upon as enemies. Those that hate to be reformed hate those that would reform them, Proverbs 9:8. [2.] It is common for those that are beloved of God to be hated by the world; whom Heaven blesses, hell curses. To those to whom God speaks comfortably wicked men will not speak peaceably. It is said here of Joseph, the lad was with the sons of Bilhah; some read it, and he was servant to them, they made him their drudge.
Historical interpretation
Historical reception
1 surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
Why does he also indicate to us Joseph’s age? For you to learn that his youth constituted no obstacle to virtue and for you to have a complete awareness of the young man’s obedience to his father and his sympathy for his brothers despite their savagery. Despite his being so well disposed to them, Joseph was unable to win them over to concord with him on the grounds of his youth so as to be willing to maintain the bond of love. Instead, they saw from the outset the youth’s inclination to virtue and the father’s favor for him and were prompted to envy him. You see, “they brought false reports about Joseph to their father Israel.”
Continue studying Genesis 37:2 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The history of Jacob’s family opens with Joseph at seventeen, keeping the flock with his brothers and carrying a bad report of them to his father.
“These are the generations of Jacob.”
Tôwlᵉdâh, the family line and its story. This is the heading for the last great section of Genesis, and it turns at once from Jacob to Joseph.
“Joseph, being seventeen years old, was feeding the flock with his brethren;”
He is close to manhood and still young, and he shares the shepherd’s work of the family. “With his brethren” places him beside the men who will soon turn against him.
“and the lad was with the sons of Bilhah, and with the sons of Zilpah, his father’s wives:”
Naʻar, a boy or youth. The brothers named are Dan, Naphtali, Gad and Asher, the sons of the two handmaids.
“and Joseph brought unto his father their evil report.”
Dibbâh raʻ, a bad and defaming report. Scripture gives neither its contents nor Joseph’s motive, and it is the first cause of the brothers’ ill will.
Passage studyGenesis 37:1–4
Joseph, the Beloved Son His Brothers Hated
Summary
Jacob settles in Canaan, the land God promised to his family, where his father Isaac had lived as a stranger. The history of his household then opens with Joseph, seventeen years old, keeping the flock with his brothers and carrying a bad report of them to his father. Jacob loves Joseph above all his other sons and gives him a coat of many colours, and the brothers answer that love with a hatred so deep that every friendly word to Joseph dies in their mouths. From this divided home God will bring the saving of the whole family.
Jacob settles where his father was a stranger
The chapter before this one lists the descendants of Esau (Genesis 36), and with that list the account of Jacob’s twin brother is finished. Now the story turns to Jacob’s own household. He has come back from his long years in Paddan-Aram, he has wrestled with God at Peniel (Genesis 32:24–32), and he has been reconciled to Esau (Genesis 33). After all that wandering he “dwelt in the land”. The verb yâshab means to sit down, to remain, to settle, and here it describes a man who has taken up residence with his large family in one place.
The verse immediately sets a second word beside that one. This is the land “wherein his father was a stranger”. The father, ʼâb, is Isaac, and the word behind “stranger”, mâgûwr, means a temporary abode or a place of sojourning, and it can speak of a pilgrimage. It is related to the root gur, to live somewhere as an alien. A sojourner in those days lived among a people as a resident alien who owned none of their land and depended on their goodwill, and Abraham described himself in those terms to the sons of Heth. The patriarchs, who lived roughly between 2000 and 1500 BC, kept flocks and moved with them, though they sometimes stayed in one place for a long time, as Jacob does here.
So Jacob is settled, and yet his family’s standing in Canaan is still that of sojourners. Naming Isaac ties Jacob to the generation before him: the son lives on the same promise, in the same land, in the same way as his father.
A promised land held by faith
This is the very land God promised to Abraham when he said he would give it to his seed (Genesis 12:7). Jacob carries that covenant, and his being in Canaan shows God keeping his word from one generation to the next. Yet Stephen reminds us that God gave Abraham no inheritance in the land, though he promised it to him and to his descendants (Acts 7:5). Abraham, Isaac and Jacob lived in the land of promise as in a foreign country, dwelling in tents and looking for the city whose builder and maker is God (Hebrews 11:9–10). They lived by the promise while the possession was still to come.
God had already told Abram that his descendants would be strangers in a land that was not theirs before they came back to Canaan (Genesis 15:13–16). Jacob’s quiet settling here is therefore the starting point for everything that carries his family down to Egypt in the chapters that follow (Genesis 37–50), where God will preserve them and make them a nation.
The patriarchs’ way of living reaches forward to us as well. All the promises of God find their Yes and Amen in Christ (2 Corinthians 1:20), and those who belong to him are called “strangers and pilgrims” (1 Peter 2:11), people whose inheritance is with God. The Son himself came and “dwelt among us” (John 1:14), living as a sojourner here and opening the way to a lasting home with God.
“These are the generations of Jacob”
Verse 2 begins with a heading. The word tôwlᵉdâh means a line of descent, a genealogy, or the record and story of a family, and Genesis uses this same heading to open its main sections, as with the heavens and the earth (Genesis 2:4) and with Adam (Genesis 5:1). Each time it tells us that the account is moving on to a new family line and what became of it.
The heading names Jacob, and the very next word is “Joseph”. The story of Jacob’s family is going to be told chiefly through this one son, because it is through Joseph that God will carry the covenant family forward. His story fills the rest of Genesis and ends with Jacob’s sons in Egypt, the beginning of the twelve tribes of Israel.
Joseph at seventeen, and the evil report
Joseph is seventeen and is “feeding the flock with his brethren”, doing the ordinary work of a family that lived by its herds. Scripture calls him “the lad”. The word naʻar covers a boy from infancy through adolescence and is often used of a servant, so it presents Joseph as the young one among grown men.
Jacob’s sons were born to four women: his wives Leah and Rachel, and their handmaids Bilhah and Zilpah. Joseph is working with the sons of the two handmaids, who are Dan and Naphtali, the sons of Rachel’s handmaid Bilhah, and Gad and Asher, the sons of Leah’s handmaid Zilpah. In a household like this the handmaids’ sons may have held a lower place than the sons of the wives, and Joseph, Rachel’s firstborn, stands among them as the favoured child. The divisions in the family are already in view before a word is spoken.
What was the evil report?
Scripture tells us that the report was bad and leaves its contents unsaid. The phrase is dibbâh raʻ. Dibbâh is a word for a defaming report, slander or infamy, and raʻ means bad or evil. It was a damaging account of what these brothers were doing, and Joseph carried it home to his father.
His motive is left unstated as well. He may have acted from honest concern for his father’s flocks and for the family’s good name, or he may have spoken with the unguarded zeal of a favoured young son. Either way, his brothers would have taken it as a betrayal, or as a bid for still greater favour, and this report is the first thing that sets them against him.
Why Israel loved Joseph above his brothers
“Now Israel loved Joseph more than all his children”. The verb ʼâhab means to love, to have affection for someone, and here it is a father’s affection resting on one son above the rest. The verse uses the name Israel, the new name God gave Jacob, and so it shows us the man who bears the covenant name failing as a father in his own house.
The reason given is that Joseph “was the son of his old age”. Bên is the ordinary word for a son, and zâqun speaks of old age: Joseph was born when Jacob was already advanced in years, while his older brothers had been born when their father was younger. He was also the firstborn of Rachel, the wife Jacob loved, who had died giving birth to Benjamin (Genesis 35:16–19). A child of his last years and of his dearest wife was very precious to him.
Jacob knew this kind of home from the inside. In his own childhood “Isaac loved Esau” while “Rebekah loved Jacob” (Genesis 25:28), and the strife that followed took years to heal. Genesis shows brothers set against one another from its earliest pages, in Cain and Abel (Genesis 4) and in Isaac and Ishmael (Genesis 21:8–21). Among the patriarchs the firstborn son ordinarily received the headship of the family and a double share of the inheritance, though a father could set a younger son ahead. Reuben, Simeon and Levi were all older than Joseph, and their father’s open preference threatened their standing.
What was the coat of many colours?
It was a garment of distinction that marked Joseph as the favoured son. The noun kᵉthôneth is the word for a tunic, shirt or coat, and one of its uses is for a long robe with sleeves. The second word, paç, gives the phrase rendered “of many colours” (in Hebrew kethoneth passim). The exact kind of garment is uncertain: it may have been a long robe with sleeves, or a richly ornamented one.
What it meant in the family is clear enough. Shepherds and labourers wore short, simple tunics suited to their work, and a robe like this spoke of status and leisure. It may even have signalled that Jacob meant to give Joseph the place of the firstborn. Because it was worn in plain sight, it put Jacob’s preference before the brothers’ eyes every day.
How the brothers answered their father’s love
The brothers “saw that their father loved him more than all his brethren”. The word for love is the same ʼâhab as in verse 3, and their seeing was a bitter awareness of it. Their response is given in three words: “they hated him”. The verb sânêʼ means to hate personally. Their hatred has a cause that can be named, and it fastens on the brother who is loved while the father who showed the partiality goes unblamed.
Scripture knows how strong this passion is. Wrath is cruel and anger is like a flood, yet envy is harder still to stand before (Proverbs 27:4). John takes us back to Cain, who was of the wicked one and killed his brother (1 John 3:12), and he says that whoever hates his brother is a murderer (1 John 3:15). The hatred of this verse is the same kind, and it will soon grow into a plot against Joseph’s life.
What does “could not speak peaceably” mean?
It means that the brothers’ hatred had shut off even the ordinary greeting of goodwill. The word is shâlôwm, which names a state of completeness, soundness, welfare, peace and safety. To speak “peaceably” to someone was to speak to him for his peace, to greet him and wish him well. The brothers were unable to bring themselves to do it. Proverbs says that a soft answer turns away wrath (Proverbs 15:1), and in Jacob’s tents the soft answers had stopped.
When brothers can only speak to one another in anger, the family is already broken, and the rest of the chapter shows how far it goes. Joseph’s dreams deepen the hatred, the brothers plot to kill him, and in the end they sell him (Genesis 37:5–28).
What Scripture says about a home like this
A house can be troubled from within. Jacob’s partiality, a gift unequally given, troubled his house for years. The pattern God gives his people is the opposite of what these four verses show: “Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love; in honour preferring one another” (Romans 12:10).
God’s purpose in a divided family
Jacob’s favouritism was a fault, Joseph’s report may have been unwise, and the brothers’ hatred was sin. God ruled over all of it. The road that begins here leads Joseph to Egypt, and there God uses him to keep the whole family alive through famine. Joseph himself says so to his brothers at the end of the book: “But as for you, ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive” (Genesis 50:20).
Paul teaches the same truth when he writes that all things work together for good to them that love God (Romans 8:28). The story also ends in mercy between the brothers themselves, when Joseph kisses them all and weeps over them, and after that they talk with him (Genesis 45:15). The brothers who had lost every peaceable word speak with him again.
Joseph and Christ, the beloved Son
Joseph’s life is a pattern that points ahead to Jesus. Joseph was the son his father loved, set apart by a special garment, and Jesus is the Son of whom the Father said that he is his beloved Son, in whom he is well pleased (Matthew 3:17). Joseph was hated by his own brothers. Jesus came to his own, “and his own received him not” (John 1:11), and he was despised and rejected of men (Isaiah 53:3). Joseph was sold for a price, and Jesus was betrayed for silver by one of the twelve (Matthew 26:14–16).
The likeness holds to the end. Joseph suffered unjustly in a foreign land and was then raised to great power, and from that place he saved his family and many others from famine. Jesus humbled himself to the death of the cross, and God has highly exalted him (Philippians 2:8–11). God shows his love for us in that Christ died for us while we were still sinners (Romans 5:8), and the risen Christ is able to save completely those who come to God by him, because he always lives to intercede for them (Hebrews 7:25). At the cross, as in Joseph’s story, God took the worst that human hatred could do and made it the means of salvation.
What this household shows us of God
These four verses are honest about the family God chose. The man who bears the name Israel loves one son above the others, a boy carries tales, and grown brothers nurse a hatred that silences them. God’s covenant rests on his own faithfulness, and it held through every one of these failures.
The passage also shows how small the beginnings of great harm can be. A gift, a report and a refusal to greet a brother are ordinary things, and they are where the pit and the sale into slavery begin. A parent who reads verse 3 can see what open preference does to the children who are passed over, and anyone who has felt envy can see in verse 4 where it leads when it is left alone.
Above all, the passage gives us a God who was already at work before anyone in the story could see it. Jacob settled in Canaan as a man still waiting for what was promised, and God was preparing, through his family’s worst days, the means of saving them. We live as strangers and pilgrims in the same way, and the promises we wait for are held by the same God.
Genesis 37:1
“And Jacob dwelt in the land”
Yâshab, to sit down or settle. After Paddan-Aram and his return, Jacob takes up residence with his family, and this settled home is where the events of Joseph’s youth take place.
“wherein his father was a stranger,”
The father (ʼâb) is Isaac. Mâgûwr is a place of sojourning: Isaac lived here as a resident alien, and by implication Jacob does too. Setting “dwelt” beside “stranger” shows a family settled in a land it is still waiting to own.
“in the land of Canaan.”
The verse names the land (ʼerets) and then names it again as Canaan, the territory God promised to Abraham’s descendants. Everything that follows, including the move to Egypt, belongs to God’s plan for this land and this family.
Genesis 37:2 This verse
“These are the generations of Jacob.”
Tôwlᵉdâh, the family line and its story. This is the heading for the last great section of Genesis, and it turns at once from Jacob to Joseph.
“Joseph, being seventeen years old, was feeding the flock with his brethren;”
He is close to manhood and still young, and he shares the shepherd’s work of the family. “With his brethren” places him beside the men who will soon turn against him.
“and the lad was with the sons of Bilhah, and with the sons of Zilpah, his father’s wives:”
Naʻar, a boy or youth. The brothers named are Dan, Naphtali, Gad and Asher, the sons of the two handmaids.
“and Joseph brought unto his father their evil report.”
Dibbâh raʻ, a bad and defaming report. Scripture gives neither its contents nor Joseph’s motive, and it is the first cause of the brothers’ ill will.
Genesis 37:3
“Now Israel loved Joseph more than all his children,”
ʼÂhab, to love. Jacob is called by his covenant name, Israel, in the very sentence that records his partiality.
“because he was the son of his old age:”
Bên, a son, a word Strong’s derives from bânâh, to build, as one who builds up the family name. Zâqun is old age. Joseph was born late in Jacob’s life and was Rachel’s firstborn.
“and he made him a coat of many colours.”
Kᵉthôneth, a tunic or coat, with paç. It was a garment for someone set apart from field labour, and it made the father’s love visible to everyone in the camp.
Genesis 37:4
“And when his brethren saw that their father loved him more than all his brethren,”
The cause is stated plainly. They saw the partiality, and it was too open to overlook.
“they hated him,”
Sânêʼ, to hate personally. This hatred will drive what they do in the rest of the chapter.
“and could not speak peaceably unto him.”
Shâlôwm, welfare and peace. They were unable to greet their brother or wish him well, which shows how completely the family’s harmony had broken down.
Last revised