Skip to content

Genesis 15:10

“The Covenant Ritual is Prepared”Genesis 15:7–11

King James Version
And he took unto him all these, and divided them in the midst, and laid each piece one against another: but the birds divided he not.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
And he took H3947 unto him all these, and divided H1334 them in the midst H8432, and laid H5414 each H376 piece H1335 one against H7125 another H7453: but the birds H6833 divided H1334 he not.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
So Abram brought all these to Him, split each of them down the middle, and laid the halves opposite each other. The birds, however, he did not cut in half.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
And he took him all these, and divided them in the midst, and laid each half over against the other: but the birds divided he not.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
He brought him all of these, and divided them in the middle, and laid each half opposite the other; but he didn’t divide the birds.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
So he tooke all these vnto him, and deuided them into the middes, and laid euery piece one against an other: but the birdes deuided he not.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
and he taketh to him all these, and separateth them in the midst, and putteth each piece over against its fellow, but the bird he hath not divided;

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
17 Hebrew words
  1. וַיִּקַּחvai·yi·kachand he broughtH3947Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-ConsecImperf-3msVerb Qal Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוַandיִּקַּחhe brought
  2. לוֹloto [the] himPrep-l ¦ 3msSuffix Personal 3rd Singular Masculineלto [the]וֹhim
  3. אֶת'et[obj.]H853DirObjMParticle Object Indicator
  4. כָּלkolallH3605N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  5. אֵלֶּה'E·lehtheseH428PrtParticle Demonstrative
  6. וַיְבַתֵּרvay·va·Terand he cut in piecesH1334Conj-w ¦ V-Piel-ConsecImperf-3msVerb Piel Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוַandיְבַתֵּרhe cut in pieces
  7. אֹתָם'o·Tam[obj.] themH853DirObjM ¦ 3mpParticle Object Indicatorאֹתָ[obj.]םthem
  8. בַּתָּוֶךְba·Ta·vekhin the middleH8432Prep-b ¦ N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absoluteבַּin theתָּוֶךְmiddle
  9. וַיִּתֵּןvai·yi·Tenand he setH5414Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-ConsecImperf-3msVerb Qal Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוַandיִּתֵּןhe set
  10. אִישׁ'isheachH376N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  11. בִּתְרוֹbit·Roits pieceH1335N-msc ¦ 3msNoun Singular Masculine Construct with suffixבִּתְרpieceוֹits
  12. לִקְרַאתlik·Ratto meetH7122Prep-l ¦ V-Qal-InfVerb Qal Infinitive Constructלִtoקְרַאתmeet
  13. רֵעֵהוּre·'E·huits neighborH7453N-msc ¦ 3msNoun Singular Masculine Construct with suffixרֵעֵneighborהוּits
  14. וְאֶתve·'Etand [obj.]H853Conj-w ¦ DirObjMParticle Object Indicatorוְandאֶת[obj.]
  15. הַצִפֹּרha·tzi·Porthe bird[s]H6833Art ¦ N-csNoun Singular common gender Absoluteהַtheצִפֹּרbird[s]
  16. לֹאlo'notH3808NegParticle Negative
  17. בָתָרva·Tarhe cut in twoH1334V-Qal-Perf-3msVerb Qal Perfect 3rd Singular Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
The Boundaries of the Promised Land
The Boundaries of the Promised Land View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 371 of 31,102 · 1.2%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Abram cuts the three larger animals in two and lays the halves opposite each other, leaving the birds whole, ready for a covenant made by passing between the pieces.

“And he took unto him all these,”

Abram brings every animal God named.

“and divided them in the midst,”

bâthar, to cut in two, down the middle of each of the larger animals.

“and laid each piece one against another:”

Each bether, or half, faces its pair, leaving a path between for the covenant rite (Jeremiah 34:18–20).

“but the birds divided he not.”

The two birds, tsippôwr, stay whole, most likely because they were too small to halve.

Passage studyGenesis 15:7–11

The LORD Answers Abram with a Covenant

7And he said unto him, I am the LORD that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees, to give thee this land to inherit it. 8And he said, Lord GOD, whereby shall I know that I shall inherit it? 9And he said unto him, Take me an heifer of three years old, and a she goat of three years old, and a ram of three years old, and a turtledove, and a young pigeon. 10And he took unto him all these, and divided them in the midst, and laid each piece one against another: but the birds divided he not. 11And when the fowls came down upon the carcases, Abram drove them away.

Summary

Abram has just believed the LORD’s promise of descendants as many as the stars, and the LORD has counted his faith to him for righteousness (Genesis 15:5–6). Now God turns to the land. He names himself as the LORD who brought Abram out of Ur of the Chaldees for the very purpose of giving him this land. Abram asks how he can know that he will inherit it, and God answers by telling him to prepare a covenant. Abram brings a heifer, a she goat and a ram, each three years old, with a turtledove and a young pigeon. He cuts the larger animals in two, lays the halves facing each other, leaves the birds whole, and drives off the birds of prey that come down on the carcases. These five verses set the stage for the moment, later in the chapter, when God alone passes between the pieces and binds himself to his promise (Genesis 15:9–21).

The LORD who brought Abram out of Ur

God begins with his name: “I am the LORD”. The Hebrew is Yᵉhôvâh, God’s own personal name, which Strong’s explains as “the self-Existent” or “the Eternal”. It is the name of the God who is always what he is, who enters into a relationship with the people he calls and keeps every promise he makes to them. By saying it here, God assures Abram that the one promising him the land is the one true God, distinct from every god Abram had known before.

He then points to something he has already done: he “brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees”. The verb yâtsâʼ means to go or come out, and in the form used here it means to bring out. Abram’s leaving Ur was God’s doing from the start, as the call in Genesis 12:1–3 shows. Ur was Abram’s homeland, a great and prosperous city whose people worshipped many gods, the moon god chief among them. To leave it, Abram had to rely entirely on a God he could not see. Now God sets that past act before him as the ground for what he promises next. The God who had already kept his word in bringing Abram out could be trusted for the rest of it. Moses later teaches Israel the same thing about him: he is the faithful God, who keeps covenant and steadfast love (Deuteronomy 7:9).

To give thee this land to inherit it

The last words of the verse give the reason for the whole journey. God brought Abram out “to give thee this land to inherit it”. The land is first of all a gift. The verb for inherit, yârash, means to occupy a place by driving out those who held it before and possessing it in their place, and so to inherit. It speaks of a secure and lasting possession, held as an heir holds what is rightfully his. Inheritance meant property, standing and blessing passing from one generation to the next, and Abram would have understood a promise of land in those terms. This one rested on God’s power and promise alone.

The promise first given in Genesis 12:1–3 is repeated here, and it matters to everything that follows. The land is where Abram’s descendants would grow into the nation of Israel, where God would give his law and set up his worship, and from which the Messiah would come. Abram himself lived in it as a stranger. Hebrews says that he went out by faith, and that he looked for a city with foundations, whose builder and maker is God (Hebrews 11:8–10).

Abram asks how he can know

Abram answers, “Lord GOD, whereby shall I know that I shall inherit it?” The address is ʼĂdônây Yᵉhôvih in Hebrew. ʼĂdônây is an emphatic form of the word for lord or master, used as a name of God, and with it Abram speaks as a servant before his master, with reverence even as he asks his question. The word printed “GOD” in capitals is the sacred name with different vowels, Yᵉhôvih, used so that readers would avoid repeating the same sound straight after ʼĂdônây. Together the two words address God as both sovereign and bound to Abram by covenant.

“Whereby” stands for the Hebrew mâh, a question word, and here Abram is asking for a means: something by which he can be sure. The verb yâdaʻ, “know”, is the ordinary word for knowing, and it covers knowing by experience as well as knowing by being told. Abram has heard the promise and understood it. He asks for a way of being certain that it will come to pass.

Was Abram doubting?

Abram is asking for a pledge he can hold on to, and he asks it straight after the verse that says, “And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness” (Genesis 15:6). God gives him a solemn covenant ceremony in reply, with no word of rebuke, and that is the clearest sign of how God received the question. In Scripture, covenants were often confirmed with a sign or a ritual, as when Abraham gave sheep and oxen to Abimelech and set seven ewe lambs apart as a witness at Beer-sheba. Abram is asking for that kind of confirmation of a promise as large as this one. His faith and his question stand side by side.

Zechariah asked a question in nearly the same words, “whereby shall I know”, when he was told of the birth of John (Luke 1:18), and his question was met with a sign that came as discipline. God’s answer to Abram is grace. The letter to the Hebrews says that God, when he made his promise to Abraham, confirmed it with an oath, and since he had no one greater to swear by, he swore by himself. So by two things that cannot change, his promise and his oath, the heirs of the promise have strong encouragement and a hope that is an anchor for the soul (Hebrews 6:13–20).

The animals God asks for

“And he said unto him, Take me an heifer…” The verb ʼâmar, “said”, is the ordinary word for saying, and here it introduces a command, as the words that follow show. “Take” is lâqach, a verb with a wide range: to take, fetch, accept or receive. As a command it gives Abram his own part to do. He is to fetch these animals himself, and he is to bring them to God, “take me”.

God names five animals: a heifer, a she goat, a ram, a turtledove and a young pigeon. The words “three years old” stand three times in the verse, once for each of the larger animals. The Hebrew shâlash means to do a third time, to be threefold, or to be three years old, and the last is its sense here. Animals of that age were full grown, healthy and valuable, fit for a covenant of this weight.

All five are animals the law of Moses later uses for offerings. The law names the herd and the flock as the source of burnt offerings (Leviticus 1:2–3), and goats and rams were among the most common sacrifices. Turtledoves and young pigeons were allowed to those who could not afford a lamb (Leviticus 5:7), and a mother brought them for her purification after childbirth (Leviticus 12:8). So the list runs from the large and costly animals to the small birds within reach of the poor.

The command also shows who leads. Abram asked how he could know, and God took up the question himself, setting out exactly what the covenant would need.

Abram cuts the animals in two

“And he took unto him all these” records Abram’s obedience, complete and without delay. He “divided them in the midst”. The verb is bâthar, which means to cut in two, and the noun for each “piece” is bether, a part or section, here each half of an animal. Abram cut the heifer, the goat and the ram down the middle and laid each half opposite its other half, so that a path ran between the rows.

Why were the animals cut in two?

The halves were laid out for the parties of a covenant to walk between, and in walking between them each party called down on himself the fate of the animals if he broke his word. Hebrew speaks of making a covenant as “cutting” one, karat berit, and this scene acts the phrase out. Scripture records the same rite in Jeremiah’s day, when the princes of Judah and Jerusalem cut a calf in twain and passed between its parts, and the LORD declared that because they broke that covenant he would give them into the hands of their enemies (Jeremiah 34:18–20). The cutting gave the agreement the full weight of life and death.

What happens next in Genesis gives this preparation its meaning. When the sun has gone down, “a smoking furnace, and a burning lamp” pass between the pieces (Genesis 15:17), and God alone walks the path that Abram has prepared. The whole weight of the covenant rests on God’s faithfulness and power. Paul makes the same point when he says that the promise to Abraham was given as a promise, and that the law, which came 430 years later, cannot set it aside (Galatians 3:15–18). The cut animals also point to the place of blood in Scripture’s covenants. Hebrews says that the first covenant was dedicated with blood, and that without shedding of blood there is no remission (Hebrews 9:18–22).

Why were the birds left whole?

The likeliest reason is their size: a turtledove and a young pigeon are too small to be cut into halves that make a path to walk between. Genesis gives the detail and leaves its reason unstated. Another view is that the birds were offered whole, the way birds were offered in the purification rites of the law (Leviticus 12:8). The word for the birds, tsippôwr, is the word for a little bird, and Strong’s traces it to a root meaning to skip about, explaining it as a hopping bird. It covers the turtledove and the young pigeon of the verse before.

Abram drives the birds of prey away

“And when the fowls came down upon the carcases, Abram drove them away.” These birds are different from the ones in Abram’s offering. The word is ʻayiṭ, a hawk or other bird of prey, a ravenous bird. Drawn by the blood, they came down, yârad, the ordinary verb for going or coming down, onto the halves that lay in the open. Birds feeding on the carcases would have torn apart what God had told Abram to prepare. So Abram drove them off. The verb nâshab means to blow, and from that to scatter, and Abram kept scattering them while he waited for God to act.

The verse shows Abram’s part in the covenant. God makes the promise and God alone will pass between the pieces, and while Abram waits he guards what God told him to set out. He treats the occasion as holy, and he keeps the sacrifice whole for the LORD.

What do the birds of prey picture?

The birds are first of all real birds, and they also make a fitting picture of everything that comes to snatch away what belongs to God. Jesus uses the same image in the parable of the sower, where seed fell by the way side, “and the fowls of the air devoured it” (Luke 8:5). Peter warns, “Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour” (1 Peter 5:8), and Paul calls believers to stand in the whole armour of God (Ephesians 6:10–18). Distraction, temptation, doubt and open opposition come most often in the time of waiting, which is where Abram stands in this verse. He keeps watch over what God has given until God comes.

The covenant and Christ

The promises in these verses find their fullness in Christ. The land of Canaan was a real inheritance, and it also pointed ahead to a greater one. Christ is the Seed of Abraham to whom the promises were made (Galatians 3:16), and as God brought Abram out of Ur, Christ brings his people out from under sin into the kingdom of God. Believers are heirs of God and joint-heirs with Christ (Romans 8:17), with an inheritance that cannot perish or fade, kept in heaven for them (1 Peter 1:3–5). There remains a rest for the people of God (Hebrews 4:9), and the Bible ends with a new heaven and a new earth where God dwells with his people (Revelation 21:1–7).

The cut animals point to the one sacrifice that seals the new covenant. Jesus is “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). He entered once into the holy place by his own blood and offered himself without spot to God (Hebrews 9:11–14), and so he is the mediator of a new covenant, through which those who are called receive the promise of eternal inheritance (Hebrews 9:15). It is a better covenant, founded on better promises (Hebrews 8:6), and by one offering he has perfected for ever those who are sanctified (Hebrews 10:14). As God alone passed between the pieces, the new covenant rests on Christ’s finished work.

Abram asked how he could know. The believer’s assurance rests on the same God. Jesus was raised again for our justification (Romans 4:25), and the Holy Spirit seals those who believe as the earnest of their inheritance until it is fully theirs (Ephesians 1:13–14).

Abram guarded an animal sacrifice from the birds, and Christ offered himself undefiled. He showed the same zeal for what belongs to God when he drove those who defiled the temple out of it (John 2:15), and on the cross he triumphed over principalities and powers (Colossians 2:15), so that nothing can snatch away the covenant he has made.

A God who binds himself to his word

In these verses God answers a believing man’s honest question with a covenant he will keep by himself. He reminds Abram of what he has already done and gives the land as a gift. Then he sets up the most solemn pledge Abram could understand, and he is the one who will walk between the pieces. Abram’s part is to believe, to obey, and to watch while he waits.

The same God speaks to us through these verses. He brings his people out before he brings them in, he is patient with those who ask him how they can be sure, and he has bound himself by promise and oath, and finally by the blood of his Son. When the birds come down in the time of waiting, Abram’s example shows us to keep watch over what God has given until he comes to fulfil his word.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Genesis 15:7–11. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 5 verses
Passage under commentGenesis 15:7–11
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here the assurance given to Abram of the land of Canaan for an inheritance.

I.God declares his purpose concerning it, Genesis 15:7.

Observe here, Abram made no complaint in this matter, as he had done for the want of a child. Note, Those that are sure of an interest in the promised seed will see no reason to doubt of a title to the promised land. If Christ is ours, heaven is ours. Observe again, When he believed the former promise (Genesis 15:6) then God explained and ratified this to him. Note, To him that has (improves what he has) more shall be given. Three things God here reminds Abram of, for his encouragement concerning the promise of this good land: -

1.What God is in himself: I am the Lord Jehovah; and therefore, (1.) "I may give it to thee, for I am sovereign Lord of all, and have a right to dispose of the whole earth." (2.) "I can give it to thee, whatever opposition may be made, though by the sons of Anak." God never promises more than he is able to perform, as men often do. (3.) "I will make good my promise to thee." Jehovah is not a man that he should lie.

2.What he had done for Abram. He had brought him out of Ur of the Chaldees, out of the fire of the Chaldees, so some, that is, either from their idolatries (for the Chaldeans worshipped the fire), or from their persecutions. The Jewish writers have a tradition that Abram was cast into a fiery furnace for refusing to worship idols, and was miraculously delivered. It is rather a place of that name. Thence God brought him by an effectual call, brought him with a gracious violence, snatched him as a brand out of the burning. This was,

(1.)A special mercy: "I brought thee, and left others, thousands, to perish there." God called him alone, Isaiah 51:2.

(2.)A spiritual mercy, a mercy to his soul, a deliverance from sin and its fatal consequences. If God save our souls, we shall want nothing that is good for us.

(3.)A fresh mercy, lately bestowed, and therefore should be the more affecting, as that in the preface to the commandments, I am the Lord that brought thee out of Egypt lately.

(4.)A foundation mercy, the beginning of mercy, peculiar mercy to Abram, and therefore a pledge and earnest of further mercy, Isaiah 66:9. Observe how God speaks of it as that which he gloried in: I am the Lord that brought thee out. He glories in it as an act both of power and grace; compare Isaiah 29:22, where he glories in it, long afterwards. Thus saith the Lord who redeemed Abraham, redeemed him from sin.

3.What he intended to do yet further for him: "I brought thee hither, on purpose to give thee this land to inherit it, not only to possess it, but to possess it as an inheritance, which is the sweetest and surest title." Note,

(1.)The providence of God has secret but gracious designs in all its various dispensations towards good people; we cannot conceive the projects of Providence, till the event shows them in all their mercy and glory.

(2.)The great thing God designs in all his dealings with his people is to bring them safely to heaven. They are chosen to salvation (2 Thessalonians 2:13), called to the kingdom (1 Thessalonians 2:12), begotten to the inheritance (1 Peter 1:3, 1 Peter 1:4), and by all made meet for it, Colossians 1:12, Colossians 1:13; 2 Corinthians 4:17.

II.Abram desires a sign:

Whereby shall I know that I shall inherit it? Genesis 15:8. This did not proceed from distrust of God's power or promise, as that of Zacharias; but he desired this,

1.For the strengthening and confirming of his own faith; he believed (Genesis 15:6), but here he prays, Lord, help me against my unbelief. Now he believed, but he desired a sign to be treasured up against an hour of temptation, not knowing how his faith might, by some event or other, be shocked and tried. Note, We all need, and should desire, helps from heaven for the confirming of our faith, and should improve sacraments, which are instituted signs, for that purpose. See Judges 6:36-40; 2 Kings 20:8-10; Isaiah 7:11, Isaiah 7:12.

2.For the ratifying of the promise to his posterity, that they also might be brought to believe it. Note, Those that are satisfied themselves should desire that others also may be satisfied of the truth of God's promises. John sent his disciples to Christ, not so much for his own satisfaction as for theirs, Matthew 11:2, Matthew 11:3. Canaan was a type of heaven. Note, It is a very desirable thing to know that we shall inherit the heavenly Canaan, that is, to be confirmed in our belief of the truth of that happiness, and to have the evidences of our title to it more and more cleared up to us.

III.God directs Abram to make preparations for a sacrifice, intending by that to give him a sign, and Abram makes preparation accordingly (Genesis 15:9-11): Take me a heifer, etc. Perhaps Abram expected some extraordinary sign from heaven; but God gives him a sign upon a sacrifice. Note, Those that would receive the assurances of God's favour, and would have their faith confirmed, must attend instituted ordinances, and expect to meet with God in them. Observe,

1.God appointed that each of the beasts used for this service should be three years old, because then they were at their full growth and strength: God must be served with the best we have, for he is the best.

2.We do not read that God gave Abram particular directions how to manage these beasts and fowls, knowing that he was so well versed in the law and custom of sacrifices that he needed not any particular directions; or perhaps instructions were given him, which he carefully observed, thought they are not recorded: at least it was intimated to him that they must be prepared for the solemnity of ratifying a covenant; and he well knew the manner of preparing them.

3.Abram took as God appointed him, though as yet he knew not how these things should become a sign to him. This was not the first instance of Abram's implicit obedience. He divided the beasts in the midst, according to the ceremony used in confirming covenants, Jeremiah 34:18, Jeremiah 34:19, where it is said, They cut the calf in twain, and passed between the parts.

4.Abram, having prepared according to God's appointment, now set himself to wait for the sign God might give him by these, like the prophet upon his watch-tower, Habakkuk 2:1. While God's appearing to own his sacrifice was deferred, Abram continued waiting, and his expectations were raised by the delay; when the fowls came down upon the carcasses to prey upon them, as common and neglected things, Abram drove them away (Genesis 15:11), believing that the vision would, at the end, speak, and not lie. Note, A very watchful eye must be kept upon our spiritual sacrifices, that nothing be suffered to prey upon them and render them unfit for God's acceptance. When vain thoughts, like these fowls, come down upon our sacrifices, we must drive them away, and not suffer them to lodge within us, but attend on God without distraction.

Historical interpretation

Three Centuries of Reception

4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

4 quotes · AD 420–735
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
400500600700

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceHebrew Questions on Genesis
(Verses 10, 11.) And he placed them opposite each other: but he did not separate the birds. However, birds descended upon the carcasses and the divisions thereof, and Abram drove them away. It does not pertain to the present work to explain the sacrament. We only say this, because the Hebrew version has for these words: And birds descended upon the carcasses, and Abram drove them away. For he deservedly often delivered Israel from narrow straits.
d. AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceCity of God 16.24
And it is said, “But the birds divided he not,” because carnal people are divided among themselves. But those who are spiritual are not divided at all, whether they seclude themselves from the busy conversation of humankind, like the turtledove, or dwell among them, like the pigeon. For both birds are simple and harmless, signifying that even in the Israelite people, to which that land was to be given, there would be individuals who were children of the promise and heirs of the kingdom that is to remain in eternal felicity.
d. AD 542Caesarius of ArlesPost-NiceneSourceSERMON 82.2
Now notice carefully Abraham is said to have divided the three animals into two parts and to have placed them one against the other. “The birds,” says Scripture, “he did not cut in two.” Why is this, brothers? Because in the church catholic, carnal people are divided but spiritual people are not. And, as Scripture says, they are separated one against the other. Why are carnal people divided and set against each other? Because all wicked lovers of the world do not cease to have divisions and scandals among each other. For this reason they are divided, since they are opposed to one another. However, the birds, that is, spiritual souls, are not divided. Why not? Because they have “one heart and one soul in the Lord.” To will and not to will is all one thing to them. Surely the turtledoves and pigeons that we mentioned above are like these souls. In the turtledove chastity is represented, and in the pigeon, simplicity. All God-fearing people in the church catholic clearly are chaste and simple, and with the psalmist they can say, “Had I but wings like a dove, I would fly away and be at rest.” And again: “The swallow finds a nest in which she puts her young.” Carnal people, who can be divided, are pressed down by the heavy fetters of vice. Spiritual people are raised on high by the wings of various virtues. As if by two wings, that is, the two precepts of love of God and charity toward the neighbor, they are lifted up to heaven. With the apostle they can say, “But our citizenship is in heaven.” As often as the priest says, “Lift up your hearts,” they can say with assurance and devotion that they have lifted them up to the Lord. However, very few and rare are the people in the church who can say this with confidence and truth. Therefore Abraham did not divide the birds, because spiritual souls who have one heart and soul, as I said, cannot be divided or separated from love of God and of neighbor. They exclaim with the apostle, “Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress or persecution?” Other words follow until it is said, “Nor any other creature will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Therefore spiritual souls are not separated from Christ by torments. Carnal souls are sometimes separated by idle gossip. The cruel sword cannot separate the former, but carnal affections can remove the latter. Nothing hard breaks down spiritual people, but even flattering words can corrupt the carnal. For this reason Abraham divided those animals into two parts, but the birds he did not divide.
d. AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceCommentary on Genesis (Hexaemeron)
The Lord replied: "Take for me a three-year-old heifer, a three-year-old goat, and a three-year-old ram, also a turtledove and a pigeon." He took all these and divided them in half, and placed each half opposite the other, but he did not divide the birds. For the heifer may signify the people under the yoke of the law; the goat the same people who would be sinful, the ram the same people who would also reign. Therefore, these animals are called three because in the third age of the world that people matured and entered the land of promise. The first age is from Adam to Noah, the second from Noah to Abraham himself, the third from Abraham to David; in which the people were saved from Egyptian servitude and transferred to the land of promise. Or if these signify something else more fitting, I would by no means doubt that the spiritual are prefigured in the addition of the turtledove and the pigeon; and thus it is said: "But he did not divide the birds," because the carnal are divided among themselves, but the spiritual by no means, whether they remove themselves from the busy dealings of men like the turtledove, or dwell among them like the pigeon; yet both birds are simple and harmless, signifying that in the very Israelite people, to whom that land was to be given, there would be undivided peoples of promise and heirs of the kingdom remaining in eternal happiness.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Genesis 15:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8