Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And I will give the men that have transgressed my covenant, which have not performed the words of the covenant which they had made before me, when they cut the calf in twain, and passed between the parts thereof,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And I will give H5414 the men H582 that have transgressed H5674 my covenant H1285, which have not performed H6965 the words H1697 of the covenant H1285 which they had made H3772 before H6440 me, when they cut H3772 the calf H5695 in twain H8147, and passed H5674 between the parts H1335 thereof,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
As for the men who violated my covenant by not living up to the conditions of the covenant which they made in my presence when they cut the calf in two and passed between its parts -
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And those who have transgressed My covenant and have not fulfilled the terms of the covenant they made before Me, I will treat like the calf they cut in two in order to pass between its pieces.
Ask
American Standard Version
And I will give the men that have transgressed my covenant, that have not performed the words of the covenant which they made before me, when they cut the calf in twain and passed between the parts thereof;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
I will give the men who have transgressed my covenant, who have not performed the words of the covenant which they made before me, when they cut the calf in two and passed between its parts;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And I will giue those men that haue broken my couenant, and haue not kept the wordes of the couenant, which they had made before me, when they cut the calfe in twaine, and passed betweene the partes thereof:
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`And I have given the men who are transgressing My covenant, who have not established the words of the covenant that they have made before Me, by the calf, that they have cut in two, and pass through between its pieces--
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 34:18 delivers a severe divine indictment against the leaders and people of Judah for their egregious violation of a sacred covenant. Under the duress of the Babylonian siege, they had publicly committed to freeing their Hebrew slaves, an act mandated by Mosaic Law, only to cynically re-enslave them once the immediate threat appeared to subside. This verse specifically condemns those who broke this solemn agreement, which had been ratified by the ancient and potent ritual of cutting a calf in two and passing between its parts, a symbolic self-malediction for unfaithfulness. Their actions exposed profound hypocrisy and a deep disregard for God's commands and the sanctity of an oath made before Him, leading to an inevitable and just divine retribution.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is a direct pronouncement of divine judgment, following a specific and blatant act of covenant breaking by King Zedekiah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem. The preceding verses in Jeremiah 34 meticulously recount the making of the covenant (Jeremiah 34:8-10), where, driven by the urgency of the Babylonian siege, they agreed to release their Hebrew slaves in accordance with the Mosaic Law (Exodus 21:2 and Deuteronomy 15:12). However, the very next verse, Jeremiah 34:11, records their immediate and cynical reversal, re-enslaving those they had just freed. Jeremiah 34:18, therefore, serves as God's definitive response to this profound hypocrisy, explicitly linking their impending punishment to their specific transgression of a covenant made directly "before me," recalling the extreme solemnity of its original ratification. The subsequent verses (Jeremiah 34:19-22) elaborate on the precise nature of the impending judgment, which will grimly mirror the self-imprecatory ritual they so casually defied.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The historical backdrop for this passage is Jerusalem during the final, desperate years of the Kingdom of Judah, specifically amidst Nebuchadnezzar's siege in 588-586 BCE. King Zedekiah, a puppet ruler installed by Babylon, had rebelled, prompting this devastating siege. Faced with imminent destruction, Zedekiah and the people, in a desperate and likely superstitious attempt to appease God and perhaps secure divine intervention, entered into a covenant to free their Hebrew slaves. This act was a public demonstration, likely intended to project piety and adherence to Mosaic Law, which mandated the release of Hebrew servants after six years of service. The ritual of "cutting the calf in twain, and passed between the parts thereof" was an ancient Near Eastern practice for ratifying the most solemn of covenants. As illustrated in Genesis 15:9-18, the parties to the covenant would walk between the divided pieces of an animal, symbolically invoking a curse upon themselves: "May I become like these divided pieces if I fail to uphold my end of the agreement." The people's subsequent re-enslavement of the freed individuals, possibly after a temporary withdrawal of Babylonian forces (likely to confront an approaching Egyptian army, as mentioned in Jeremiah 37:5), starkly revealed their profound insincerity and contempt for the very God they sought to manipulate.
  • Key Themes: The overarching theme in Jeremiah 34 and particularly in this verse is the broken covenant and the inevitability of divine judgment. The actions of the people underscore their deep-seated hypocrisy and insincerity, as their fleeting obedience was not born of genuine repentance or faith, but of pragmatic self-preservation. This passage profoundly highlights the solemnity of oaths and promises made before God; such commitments are not to be taken lightly, cynically manipulated, or treated as conditional upon shifting circumstances. The passage also vividly portrays God's righteous indignation against unfaithfulness and His unwavering commitment to upholding the integrity of His covenant relationship, even when His people demonstrably fail to do so. Their failure to "perform the words of the covenant" directly leads to God's "giving" them over to the very fate they symbolically invoked upon themselves through their defiled ritual.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • covenant (Hebrew, bᵉrîyth', H1285): From a root (H1285) meaning "to cut," this term refers to a solemn, binding agreement or compact, often established by a ritual involving the cutting of flesh and passing between the pieces. It signifies a sacred relationship with profound obligations and severe consequences for violation. Here, it underscores the sacred and unbreakable nature of the promise made before God, emphasizing the gravity of its breach.
  • performed (Hebrew, qûwm', H6965): This word (H6965) means "to rise," "to stand up," or "to establish/confirm." When applied to a covenant or word, it signifies to uphold, fulfill, or carry out. The phrase "have not performed" indicates a deliberate and active failure to uphold, establish, or execute the terms of the agreement they had made, highlighting a willful and conscious breach rather than a mere oversight.
  • cut (Hebrew, kârath', H3772): A primitive root (H3772) meaning "to cut off, down, or asunder." In covenant contexts, it specifically means "to covenant" or "to make an alliance," originally by cutting flesh and passing between the pieces. This word powerfully evokes the ancient, self-imprecatory ritual that sealed the covenant, underscoring the extreme gravity and binding nature of the oath taken by the people.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And I will give the men that have transgressed my covenant": This opening clause immediately establishes God's active and decisive role in judgment. The Hebrew verb for "give" (H5414, nâthan) here carries the strong connotation of "deliver over" or "hand over" to punishment. God declares His direct intention to deliver these specific individuals—"the men"—who have deliberately "transgressed" (literally, "crossed over" or violated) His covenant. This highlights divine justice and the direct accountability for their actions.
  • "which have not performed the words of the covenant which they had made before me": This clause precisely defines the nature of their transgression: a willful failure to "perform" or uphold the terms ("words") of the solemn agreement. Crucially, the covenant was "made before me," emphasizing that God Himself was the supreme witness and ultimate party to whom they were accountable. This makes their breach not merely a human failing but a direct affront to God's holiness, authority, and the sanctity of His name.
  • "when they cut the calf in twain, and passed between the parts thereof": This final clause vividly recalls the ancient, gruesome ritual that solemnized the covenant. The act of "cutting the calf in twain" (into two halves, H8147) and "passing between the parts thereof" (H1335) was a self-maledictory oath. It powerfully symbolized that if the covenant-makers failed to uphold their end, they would suffer the same fate as the divided animal—being torn asunder. By failing to keep their word after such a potent symbolic act, they effectively invoked this very curse upon themselves, and God now declares He will bring it to pass as a just consequence.

Literary Devices

The verse powerfully employs Symbolism through the detailed description of the ancient covenant ritual. The act of cutting a calf in two and passing between its parts is not merely a procedural detail but a potent visual symbol of the self-malediction invoked by the covenanting parties. It signifies, "May I be torn asunder like this animal if I break this oath," making the consequences of violation explicit and visceral. The people's subsequent violation of the covenant, after willingly participating in such a ritual, represents a profound Irony: they bound themselves with a curse for unfaithfulness, only to immediately prove themselves unfaithful, thereby bringing the very curse upon themselves. This highlights the depth of their hypocrisy and the self-inflicted nature of their impending doom. Furthermore, the declaration "And I will give the men..." demonstrates Anthropomorphism, attributing to God the human action of "giving over" or "delivering" the transgressors to their just punishment, emphasizing His active and personal involvement in upholding justice and covenant integrity.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 34:18 profoundly underscores the absolute gravity of covenant faithfulness and the unwavering seriousness with which God regards promises made before Him. This passage reveals that God is not merely a passive observer of human vows but an active participant and formidable enforcer of covenants, especially those made in His sacred name. The people's cynical manipulation of a solemn vow, driven by temporary convenience and self-preservation rather than genuine conviction, exposed their spiritual bankruptcy and drew a swift and severe divine response. This serves as a timeless and sobering reminder that true repentance and obedience are demonstrated not by temporary acts of piety performed under duress, but by enduring integrity, steadfast adherence to God's commands, and unwavering commitment to our own sworn obligations. The dire consequences for such blatant disregard for sacred oaths reflect God's unwavering justice and His expectation of genuine, heartfelt faithfulness from His people, demonstrating that He cannot be mocked or manipulated.

  • Genesis 15:17-18 - Describes God Himself, represented by a smoking pot and flaming torch, passing between the divided pieces, signifying His unilateral, unconditional, and unwavering commitment to His covenant with Abraham, standing in stark contrast to Judah's faithlessness.
  • Deuteronomy 28:15 - Outlines the comprehensive curses that will befall Israel if they fail to obey the voice of the Lord and diligently keep His commandments and statutes, providing a broader Mosaic context for the severe consequences of covenant breach.
  • Leviticus 26:25 - Warns that God will bring a sword upon those who break His covenant, directly linking covenant violation with divine judgment, warfare, and desolation.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jeremiah 34:18 serves as a stark and sobering reminder that God takes our promises seriously, especially those made in His presence or under His authority. While we may no longer engage in ancient animal sacrifice rituals to seal our vows, the divine principle of integrity and faithfulness remains paramount. This passage challenges us to deeply examine the sincerity of our own commitments—whether they are vows made in marriage, baptismal promises, commitments to serve in the church, or even simple promises made to others. Do we uphold our word even when circumstances change, when it becomes inconvenient, or when it requires personal sacrifice? The people of Judah's actions highlight the profound danger of superficial repentance and obedience driven by fear or self-interest rather than genuine love and devotion to God. True faith is demonstrated not by outward acts alone, but by a heart that consistently seeks to honor God through steadfast obedience and unwavering integrity in all dealings. This calls us to cultivate a character marked by truthfulness and reliability, recognizing that our word reflects our reverence for the God who is Himself faithful and true in all His promises.

Questions for Reflection

  • What promises or commitments have I made before God (e.g., baptismal vows, marriage vows, commitments in prayer or service) that I need to prayerfully re-evaluate for faithfulness and sincerity?
  • In what areas of my life might my obedience or commitments be driven by convenience, external pressure, or self-interest rather than genuine love and devotion to God?
  • How does the solemnity of the ancient covenant ritual, with its self-imprecatory nature, challenge my understanding of the seriousness with which God views my word and personal integrity?
  • What practical steps can I take to cultivate greater faithfulness, reliability, and integrity in my daily life, ensuring my actions consistently align with my stated beliefs and commitments?

FAQ

What was the significance of "cutting the calf in twain, and passed between the parts thereof"?

Answer: This was an ancient Near Eastern ritual for solemnizing a covenant, often referred to as a "covenant by blood" or "cutting a covenant." The parties making the covenant would cut an animal (like a calf) into two halves and then walk between the divided pieces. This act was a powerful symbolic self-malediction, meaning they were invoking a curse upon themselves, essentially declaring, "May I be cut in two like this animal if I fail to keep my end of the agreement." It underscored the extreme gravity and binding nature of the oath, making the subsequent breach by the people of Judah all the more egregious and deserving of the very fate they symbolically invoked. A famous biblical example is found in Genesis 15:9-18, where God Himself, represented by a smoking pot and flaming torch, passes through the pieces, signifying His unwavering commitment to His covenant.

Why was God so angry with the people of Judah in this instance?

Answer: God's anger stemmed from the profound hypocrisy, blatant disregard for His covenant, and direct contempt for His Mosaic Law. The people of Judah, under the immense pressure of the Babylonian siege, made a solemn covenant before God to free their Hebrew slaves, as explicitly mandated by the Mosaic Law (e.g., Exodus 21:2, Deuteronomy 15:12). This act was likely a desperate, last-ditch attempt to gain divine favor and relief from the siege. However, as soon as the Babylonian army temporarily withdrew (as described in Jeremiah 34:11), they immediately and shamelessly re-enslaved the very people they had just freed. This demonstrated that their "repentance" and obedience were superficial, self-serving, and opportunistic, not born of genuine conviction, love for God, or true justice. Their actions mocked the sanctity of the covenant, insulted God's holiness, and provoked His righteous judgment.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Jeremiah 34:18, with its stark portrayal of a broken covenant and the severe judgment it justly incurs, powerfully foreshadows humanity's ultimate need for a new and unbreakable covenant—one that humanity, in its fallen and rebellious state, could never perfectly uphold. The repeated failure of Judah to "perform the words of the covenant" made before God highlights the universal human inability to perfectly keep God's law and promises, revealing a profound inadequacy that necessitates a divine solution. Jesus Christ is the glorious fulfillment of this desperate need, inaugurating the New Covenant through His blood. Unlike the Old Covenant, which was contingent on imperfect human obedience and repeatedly broken, the New Covenant is established on the perfect obedience and sacrificial death of Christ. He is the ultimate Lamb, whose body was "cut in twain" on the cross, not as a self-malediction for His own failure, but as the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice to atone for humanity's pervasive covenant failures. By His substitutionary death, He perfectly "performed the words" of God's will (John 4:34), establishing a covenant of grace that guarantees forgiveness, righteousness, and eternal life to all who believe. Through Christ, believers are given a new heart and the indwelling Holy Spirit to enable them to walk in God's statutes (Ezekiel 36:26-27), ensuring that the terms of this New Covenant are eternally upheld, not by our flawed efforts, but by His perfect work and the transformative power of His Spirit. Thus, Jeremiah's lament over a broken covenant ultimately directs our gaze to the unbreakable, eternal covenant secured by the unwavering faithfulness and perfect sacrifice of Christ.

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 34 verses 8–22

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here another prophecy upon a particular occasion, the history of which we must take notice of, as necessary to give light to the prophecy.

I. When Jerusalem was closely besieged by the Chaldean army the princes and people agreed upon a reformation in one instance, and that was concerning their servants.

1.The law of God was very express, that those of their own nation should not be held in servitude above seven years, but, after they had served one apprenticeship, they should be discharged and have their liberty; yea, though they had sold themselves into servitude for the payment of their debts, or though they were sold by the judges for the punishment of their crimes. This difference was put between their brethren and strangers, that those of other nations taken in war, or bought with money, might be held in perpetual slavery, they and theirs; but their brethren must serve but for seven years at the longest. This God calls the covenant that he had made with them when he brought them out of the land of Egypt, Jer 34:13, Jer 34:14. This was the first of the judicial laws which God gave them (Exo 21:2), and there was good reason for this law. (1.) God had put honour upon that nation, and he would have them thus to preserve the honour of it themselves and to put a difference between it and other nations. (2.) God had brought them out of slavery in Egypt, and he would have them thus to express their grateful sense of that favour, by letting those go to whom their houses were houses of bondage, as Egypt had been to their forefathers. That deliverance is therefore mentioned here (Jer 34:13) as the ground of that law. Note, God's compassions towards us should engage our compassions towards our brethren; we must release as we are released, forgive as we are forgiven, and relieve as we are relieved. And this is called a covenant; for our performance of the duty required is the condition of the continuance of the favours God has bestowed.

2.This law they and their fathers had broken. Their worldly profit swayed more with them than God's command or covenant. When their servants had lived seven years with them they understood their business, and how to apply themselves to it, better than they did when they first came to them, and therefore they would then by no means part with them, though God himself by his law had made them free: Your fathers hearkened not to me in this matter (Jer 34:14), so that from the days of their fathers they had been in this trespass; and they thought they might do it because their fathers did it, and their servants had by disuse lost the benefit of the provision God made for them; whereas against an express law, especially against an express law of God, no custom, usage, nor prescription, is to be admitted in plea. For this sin of theirs, and their fathers, God now brought them into servitude, and justly.

3.When they were besieged, and closely shut in, by the army of the Chaldeans, they, being told of their fault in this matter, immediately reformed, and let go all their servants that were entitled to their freedom by the law of God, as Pharaoh, who, when the plague was upon him, consented to let the people go, and bound themselves in a covenant to do so. (1.) The prophets faithfully admonished them concerning their sin. From them they heard that they should let their Hebrew servants go free, Jer 34:10. They might have read it themselves in the book of the law, but did not, or did not heed it, therefore the prophets told them what the law was. See what need there is of the preaching of the word; people must hear the word preached because they will not make the use they ought to make of the word written. (2.) All orders and degrees of men concurred in this reformation. The king, and the princes, and all the people, agreed to let go their servants, whatever loss or damage they might sustain by so doing. When the king and princes led in this good work the people could not for shame but follow. The example and influence of great men would go very far towards extirpating the most inveterate corruptions. (3.) They bound themselves by a solemn oath and covenant that they would do this, whereby they engaged themselves to God and one another. Note, What God has bound us to by his precept, it is good for us to bind ourselves to by our promise. This covenant was very solemn: it was made in a sacred place, made before me, in the house which is called by my name (Jer 34:15), in the special presence of God, the tokens of which, in the temple, ought to strike an awe upon them and make them very sincere in their appeals to him. It was ratified by a significant sign; they cut a calf in two, and passed between the parts thereof (Jer 34:18, Jer 34:19) with this dreadful imprecation, "Let us be in like manner cut asunder if we do not perform what we now promise." This calf was probably offered up in sacrifice to God, who was thereby made a party to the covenant. When God covenanted with Abraham, for the ratification of it, a smoking furnace and a burning lamp passed between the pieces of the sacrifice, in allusion to this federal rite, Gen 15:17. Note, In order that we may effectually oblige ourselves to our duty, it is good to alarm ourselves with the apprehensions of the terror of the wrath and curse to which we expose ourselves if we live in the contempt of it, that wrath which will cut sinners asunder (Mat 24:51), and sensible signs may be of use to make the impressions of it deep and durable, as here. (4.) They conformed themselves herein to the command of God and their covenant with him; they did let their servants go, though at this time, when the city was besieged, they could very ill spare them. Thus they did right in God's sight, Jer 34:15. Though it was their trouble that drove them to it, yet he was well pleased with it; and if they had persevered in this act of mercy to the poor, to their poor servants, it might have been a lengthening of their tranquillity, Dan 4:27.

II. When there was some hope that the siege was raised and the danger over they repented of their repentance, undid the good they had done, and forced the servants they had released into their respective services again. 1. The king of Babylon's army had now gone up from them, Jer 34:21. Pharaoh was bringing an army of Egyptians to oppose the progress of the king of Babylon's victories, upon the tidings of which the Chaldeans raised the siege for a time, as we find, Jer 37:5. They departed from Jerusalem. See how ready God was to put a stop to his judgments, upon the first instance of reformation, so slow is he to anger and so swift to show mercy. As soon as ever they let their servants go free God let them go free. 2. When they began to think themselves safe from the besiegers they made their servants come back into subjection to them, Jer 34:11, and again Jer 34:16. This was a great abuse to their servants, to whom servitude would be more irksome, after they had had some taste of the pleasures of liberty. It was a great shame to themselves that they could not keep in a good mind when they were in it. But it was especially an affront to God; in doing this they polluted his name, Jer 34:16. It was a contempt of the command he had given them, as if that were of no force at all, but they might either keep it or break it as they thought fit. It was a contempt of the covenant they had made with him, and of that wrath which they had imprecated upon themselves in case they should break that covenant. It was jesting with God almighty, as if he could be imposed upon by fallacious promises, which, when they had gained their point, they would look upon themselves no longer obliged by. it was lying to God with their mouths and flattering him with their tongues. It was likewise a contempt of the judgments of God and setting them at defiance; as if, when once the course of them was stopped a little and interrupted, they would never proceed again and the judgment would never be revived; whereas reprieves are so far from being pardons that if they be abused thus, and sinners take encouragement from them to return to sin, they are but preparatives for heavier strokes of divine vengeance.

III. For this treacherous dealing with God they are here severely threatened. Be not deceived; God is not mocked. Those that think to put a cheat upon God by a dissembled repentance, a fallacious covenant, and a partial temporary reformation, will prove in the end to have put the greatest cheat upon their own souls; for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God. it is here threatened, with an observable air of displeasure against them, 1. That, since they had not given liberty to their servants to go where they pleased, God would give all his judgments liberty to take their course against them without control (Jer 34:17): You have not proclaimed liberty to your servants. Though they had done it (Jer 34:10), yet they might truly be said not to have done it, because they did not stand to it, but undid it again; and factum non dicitur quod non perseverat - that is not said to be done which does not last. The righteousness that is forsaken and turned away from shall be forgotten, and not mentioned any more than if it had never been, Eze 18:24. "Therefore I will proclaim a liberty for you; I will discharge you from my service, and put you out of my protection, which those forfeit that withdraw from their allegiance. You shall have liberty to choose which of these judgments you will be cut off by, sword, famine, or pestilence;" such a liberty as was offered to David, which put him into a great strait, Sa2 24:14. Note, Those that will not be in subjection to the law of God put themselves into subjection to the wrath and curse of God. But this shows what liberty to sin really - it is but a liberty to the sorest judgments. 2. That, since they had brought their servants back into confinement in their houses, God would make them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth, where they should live in servitude, and, being strangers, could not expect the privileges of free-born subjects. 3. That, since they had broken the covenant which they ratified by a solemn imprecation, God would bring on them the evil which they imprecated upon themselves in case they should break it. out of their own mouth will he judge them, and so shall their doom be; the penalty of their bond shall be recovered, because they have not performed the condition; for so some read Jer 34:18, "I will make the men which have transgressed my covenant as the calf which they cut in twain; I will divide them asunder as they divided it asunder." 4. That, since they would not let go their servants out of the hands, God would deliver them into the hands of those that hated them, even the princes and nobles both of Judah and Jerusalem (of the country and of the city), the eunuchs (chamberlains, or great officers of the court), the priests, and all the people, Jer 34:19. They had all dealt treacherously with God, and therefore shall all be involved in the common ruin without exception. They shall all be given unto the hand of their enemies, that seek, not their wealth only, or their service, but their life, and they shall have what they seek; but neither shall that content them: when they have their lives they shall leave their dead bodies unburied, a loathsome spectacle to all mankind and an easy prey to the fowls and beasts, a lasting mark of ignominy being hereby fastened on them, Jer 34:20. 5. That, since they had emboldened themselves in returning to their sin, contrary to their covenant, by the retreat of the Chaldean army from them, God would therefore bring it upon them again: "They have now gone up from you, and your fright is over for the present, but I will command them to face about as they were; they shall return to this city, and take it and burn it," Jer 34:22. Note, (1.) As confidence in God is a hopeful presage of approaching deliverance, so security in sin is a sad omen of approaching destruction. (2.) When judgments are removed from a people before they have done their work, leave them, but leave them unhumbled and unreformed, it is cum animo revertendi - with a design to return; they do but retreat to come on again with so much the greater force; for when God judges he will overcome. (3.) It is just with God to disappoint those expectations of mercy which his providence had given cause for when we disappoint those expectations of duty which our professions, pretensions, and fair promises, had given cause for. If we repent of the good we had purposed, God will repent of the good he had purposed. With the froward thou will show thyself froward.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 8–22. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER SEVEN
[Daniel 7:1] "In the first year of Belshazzar, King of Babylon, Daniel beheld a dream. And a vision of his head upon his bed. And when he wrote the dream down, he comprehended it in a few words and gave a brief summary of it, saying..." This section which we now undertake to explain, and also the subsequent section which we are going to discuss, is historically prior to the two previous sections. For this present section and that which follows it are recorded to have taken place in the first and third years of the reign of King Belshazzar (Jeremiah 39) [Jerome's citation of Jeremiah 39 seems quite pointless in this connection]. But the section which we read previously to the one just preceding this, is recorded to have taken place in the last year, indeed on the final day, of Belshaz-zar's reign. And we meet this phenomenon not only in Daniel but also in Jeremiah [cf. Jeremiah 35 and Jeremiah 34] and Ezekiel (Ezekiel 17), as we shall be able to show, if life spares us that long. But in the earlier portion of the book, the historical order has been followed, namely the events which occurred in the time of Nebuchadnezzar, and Belshazzar, and Darius or Cyrus. But in the passages now before us an account is given of various visions which were beheld on particular occasions and of which only the prophet himself was aware, and which therefore lacked any importance as signs or revelations so far as the barbarian nations were concerned. But they were written down only that a record of the things beheld might be preserved for posterity.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 34:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.