Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
But they like men have transgressed the covenant: there have they dealt treacherously against me.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But they like men H120 have transgressed H5674 the covenant H1285: there have they dealt treacherously H898 against me.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"But they, just like men, have broken the covenant, they have been faithless in dealing with me.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But they, like Adam, have transgressed the covenant; there they were unfaithful to Me.
Ask
American Standard Version
But they like Adam have transgressed the covenant: there have they dealt treacherously against me.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
But they, like Adam, have broken the covenant. They were unfaithful to me, there.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But they like men haue transgressed the couenant: there haue they trespassed against me.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And they, as Adam, transgressed a covenant, There they dealt treacherously against me.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Hosea 6:7 serves as a stark indictment against the Northern Kingdom of Israel, highlighting their profound and deliberate breach of the covenant with Yahweh. The prophet declares that Israel has transgressed God's sacred pact, not merely through ignorance or weakness, but with a calculated treachery reminiscent of humanity's foundational rebellion against divine command. This verse underscores the deep personal offense against God inherent in Israel's unfaithfulness, revealing a pattern of spiritual betrayal that mirrors the original sin of Adam and echoes throughout their history.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Hosea 6:7 is situated within a broader prophetic lament and rebuke directed at Israel (often referred to as Ephraim) for their spiritual apostasy. The preceding verses (Hosea 6:1-6) depict Israel's superficial and fleeting repentance, which God rejects because it lacks genuine knowledge of Him and steadfast love (Hebrew: hesed). God explicitly states, "For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings" Hosea 6:6. Against this backdrop of half-hearted devotion and religious ritual devoid of true heart-change, verse 7 delivers a crushing accusation, revealing the deep-seated nature of their rebellion. It transitions from God's desire for genuine relationship to the harsh reality of Israel's persistent betrayal, setting the stage for further pronouncements of judgment and the ultimate call for return.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of Hosea prophesies during the tumultuous final decades of the Northern Kingdom of Israel (8th century BCE), a period marked by political instability, assassinations of kings, and shifting alliances with foreign powers like Assyria and Egypt. Culturally, Israel had deeply assimilated Canaanite religious practices, particularly the worship of Baal, which involved fertility rites and idolatry. This syncretism was a direct violation of the Mosaic Covenant, which demanded exclusive allegiance to Yahweh. The concept of a "covenant" (bᵉrîyth) was well-understood in the Ancient Near East, often involving a suzerain-vassal treaty where a powerful king (suzerain) established terms with a lesser king or people (vassal), promising protection in exchange for loyalty and obedience. God's covenant with Israel at Sinai was of this nature, establishing a unique and binding relationship. Israel's "treachery" was not merely a breaking of rules but a profound betrayal of this sacred, relational, and political pact with their divine King.
  • Key Themes: Hosea 6:7 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in the book of Hosea. The most prominent is Covenant Transgression, emphasizing Israel's repeated and deliberate violation of the Mosaic Covenant established at Mount Sinai. This transgression is portrayed not as an isolated incident but as a persistent pattern of unfaithfulness, akin to an adulterous spouse, a central metaphor throughout the book, particularly vivid in Hosea 1-3. Another key theme is Human Treachery and Betrayal, highlighting the personal nature of Israel's sin as a deep breach of trust against God, who had faithfully loved and provided for them. The phrase "dealt treacherously against me" underscores God's profound grief and sense of betrayal. Finally, the "like Adam" interpretation introduces the theme of Original and Universal Rebellion, suggesting that Israel's sin mirrors the foundational act of disobedience by Adam in the Garden of Eden, thereby connecting Israel's specific unfaithfulness to the broader narrative of humanity's fallen nature and propensity for rebellion against God's direct commands.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • men (Hebrew, ʼâdâm', H120): This word refers to a human being, an individual, or mankind. While often translated "men" in a general sense, the Hebrew ke'adam (כְּאָדָם) literally means "like Adam." This specific interpretation suggests a profound theological parallel, implying that Israel's transgression was not merely a common human failing but a foundational act of disobedience mirroring the original sin of Adam, who also broke a direct covenantal command from God. It points to a deep-seated, archetypal rebellion.
  • transgressed (Hebrew, ʻâbar', H5674): This primitive root means "to cross over," used widely for any transition, including to "pass over" or "violate." In the context of a covenant, it signifies a deliberate act of breaking a binding agreement, stepping across a boundary that should not be crossed. It implies a conscious and willful act of disobedience against the established terms of the relationship.
  • covenant (Hebrew, bᵉrîyth', H1285): This term refers to a compact or solemn agreement, often made by passing between pieces of flesh (a ritual signifying the consequences of breaking the pact). It denotes a binding agreement, confederacy, or league. In Hosea 6:7, it specifically refers to the Mosaic Covenant, the foundational agreement between Yahweh and Israel, which outlined their mutual obligations and the terms of their unique relationship.
  • dealt treacherously (Hebrew, bâgad', H898): This primitive root means "to cover (with a garment)," but figuratively, "to act covertly," and by implication, "to pillage." It signifies acting faithlessly, perfidiously, or betraying trust. This verb is frequently used in marital contexts to describe unfaithfulness, reinforcing Hosea's central metaphor of Israel as an unfaithful spouse to God. It highlights the deeply personal and offensive nature of Israel's sin, not just as a legal violation but as a profound breach of loyalty and affection.

Verse Breakdown

  • "But they like men have transgressed the covenant": This clause introduces a sharp contrast ("But") to the superficial repentance described previously. The phrase "like men" (or "like Adam") immediately sets a profound theological tone, likening Israel's covenant breach to the foundational disobedience of Adam in Eden. Their transgression (ʻâbar) of the covenant (bᵉrîyth) was not accidental or ignorant, but a deliberate, willful act of stepping over the boundaries God had established for their relationship, demonstrating a deep-seated rebellion against divine authority and a failure to uphold their sacred obligations.
  • "there have they dealt treacherously against me.": The adverb "there" (Hebrew: sham) likely refers to a specific place of idolatry or covenant breaking, possibly Gilgal (mentioned in Hosea 4:15 and Hosea 9:15), a place historically significant for Israel's entry into the land and renewal of covenant, but which had become a center for idol worship. The verb "dealt treacherously" (bâgad) emphasizes the perfidious and deceitful nature of their actions, portraying their sin not merely as a legal infraction but as a profound personal betrayal of God's trust and love, akin to an act of infidelity in a marriage. This highlights the emotional depth of God's pain over their unfaithfulness.

Literary Devices

Hosea 6:7 employs several powerful literary devices to convey its message of Israel's profound unfaithfulness. The most striking is the Simile "like men" (or "like Adam"). This comparison is deeply significant, linking Israel's specific covenant transgression to the archetypal human rebellion against God's command in the Garden of Eden. It elevates Israel's sin from a mere societal failing to a fundamental act of human depravity, echoing the original fall. The verse also implicitly uses Personification by describing the "covenant" as something that can be "transgressed" and by highlighting the "treachery" committed "against me" (God), treating the covenant as a living relationship that can be betrayed and God as a person deeply wounded by unfaithfulness. Furthermore, the entire book of Hosea, and this verse within it, functions as an extended Metaphor of marriage, where God is the faithful husband and Israel the unfaithful wife. The phrase "dealt treacherously" (often used for marital infidelity) reinforces this metaphor, underscoring the depth of Israel's betrayal of their covenant relationship with Yahweh.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Hosea 6:7 encapsulates the profound theological truth that sin is not merely the breaking of rules but a personal betrayal of God. It highlights the inherent human propensity to rebel against divine authority, tracing this inclination back to the very first act of disobedience by Adam. Israel, chosen by God and bound to Him by a solemn covenant, repeatedly demonstrated this same foundational unfaithfulness, proving that even a divinely established relationship and clear commands do not negate humanity's fallen nature. This verse underscores God's character as one who enters into covenantal relationship, expects faithfulness, and is deeply grieved by betrayal, yet His steadfast love (hesed) persists even in the face of such profound treachery, holding out the possibility of repentance and restoration.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Hosea 6:7 serves as a poignant mirror for believers today, challenging us to examine the authenticity and depth of our relationship with God. It reminds us that God desires genuine faithfulness and a heart wholly devoted to Him, not just outward religious performance or superficial acts of obedience. Our sin, like Israel's, is not merely a violation of abstract rules but a personal betrayal of the One who loves us unconditionally and has entered into a covenant relationship with us through Christ. This verse prompts us to consider whether we, too, have "dealt treacherously" against God through our compromises, our divided loyalties, or our half-hearted devotion. It calls us to move beyond mere ritual to a true "knowledge of God" that transforms our hearts and leads to steadfast love and obedience. Recognizing the gravity of our unfaithfulness should lead us to sincere repentance and a renewed commitment to walk in integrity and loyalty with our faithful God.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might my own "repentance" be superficial, lacking genuine knowledge of God and steadfast love, as Hosea describes?
  • Do I view my sin primarily as breaking rules, or as a personal betrayal of God's love and trust in our relationship?
  • How does the "like Adam" analogy challenge my understanding of the deep-seated nature of sin and my own propensity for rebellion against God?
  • What practical steps can I take to cultivate a deeper, more authentic faithfulness and loyalty to God in my daily life?

FAQ

What is the significance of "like men" or "like Adam" in Hosea 6:7?

Answer: The Hebrew phrase ke'adam (כְּאָדָם) can be translated as "like men" (referring to humanity in general) or "like Adam" (referring specifically to the first man). While both interpretations highlight human sinfulness, the "like Adam" rendering is often preferred by scholars due to its profound theological implications. It suggests that Israel's transgression of the covenant was not merely a common human failing but a foundational act of disobedience, mirroring Adam's original sin in the Garden of Eden. Just as Adam broke a direct command from God, Israel repeatedly violated the terms of their covenant, demonstrating a deep-seated inclination towards rebellion that connects their specific unfaithfulness to the universal narrative of humanity's fall (see Romans 5:12-14). This interpretation underscores the gravity of Israel's sin as an archetypal act of rebellion against divine authority.

How does Hosea 6:7 relate to the broader theme of covenant in the Old Testament?

Answer: Hosea 6:7 is central to the Old Testament theme of covenant, particularly the Mosaic Covenant established at Mount Sinai. This covenant was a binding agreement between God and Israel, outlining their mutual obligations: God promised to be their God and bless them, and Israel promised to obey His laws and worship Him exclusively. Hosea 6:7 directly accuses Israel of "transgressing the covenant" and "dealing treacherously" against God, highlighting their failure to uphold their end of this sacred pact. This verse, therefore, underscores the seriousness of covenant breaking, which in the Old Testament was seen as a profound act of disloyalty and spiritual adultery against a faithful God. It sets the stage for the prophetic warnings of judgment and the ultimate hope for a new covenant, where God's law would be written on hearts (Jeremiah 31:31-34).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Hosea 6:7, with its stark portrayal of Israel's covenant transgression and treachery "like Adam," powerfully foreshadows the universal human condition that necessitates the coming of Christ. Just as Israel repeatedly broke their covenant with God, all humanity, in Adam, has fallen short of God's glory and dealt treacherously against Him, living in rebellion and spiritual death (Romans 3:23). The law, given to Israel through Moses, exposed this inherent unfaithfulness, showing humanity's inability to perfectly fulfill God's righteous demands (Romans 7:7-13). Christ, however, perfectly fulfilled the covenant that Israel failed to keep. He is the faithful Adam, the true Israel, who lived a life of perfect obedience, never transgressing God's will (Hebrews 4:15). Through His atoning death on the cross, Jesus bore the penalty for humanity's covenant breaking and treachery, offering Himself as the ultimate sacrifice to reconcile us to God (2 Corinthians 5:21). In Him, believers are brought into a new and better covenant, not based on human performance but on His shed blood, where God's law is written on our hearts by the Holy Spirit, enabling us to walk in faithfulness and true knowledge of God (Hebrews 8:6-13). Thus, Hosea 6:7, in its lament over human failure, ultimately points to the glorious triumph of God's grace in Jesus Christ, who perfectly fulfills the covenant and redeems those who, like Adam, have fallen.

Copy as

Commentary on Hosea 6 verses 4–11

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Two things, two evil things, both Judah and Ephraim are here charged with, and justly accused of: -

I. That they were not firm to their own convictions, but were unsteady, unstable as water, Hos 6:4, Hos 6:5. O Ephraim! what shall I do unto thee? O Judah! what shall I do unto thee? This is a strange expression. Can Infinite Wisdom be at a loss what to do? Can it be nonplussed, or put upon taking new measures? By no means; but God speaks after the manner of men, to show how absurd and unreasonable they were, and how just his proceedings against them were. Let them not complain of him as harsh and severe in tearing them, and smiting them, as he has done; for what else should he do? What other course could he take with them? God had tried various methods with them (What could have been done more to his vineyard than he had done? Isa 5:4), and very loth he was to let things go to extremity; he reasons with himself (as Hos 11:9), How shall I give thee up, Ephraim? God would have done them good, but they were not qualified for it: "What shall I do unto thee? What else can I do but cast thee off, when I cannot in honour save thee?" Note, God never destroys sinners till he sees there is no other way with them. See here, 1. What their conduct was towards God: Their goodness, or kindness, was as the morning cloud. Some understand it of their kindness to themselves and their own souls, in their repentance; it is indeed mercy to ourselves to repent of our sins, but they soon retracted that kindness to themselves, undid it again, and wronged their own souls as much as ever. But it is rather to be taken for their piety and religion; what good appeared in them sometimes, it soon vanished and disappeared again, as the morning cloud and the early dew. Such was the goodness of Israel in Jehu's time, and of Judah in Hezekiah's and Josiah's time; it was soon gone. In time of drought the morning-cloud promises rain, and the early dew is some present refreshment to the earth; but the cloud is dispersed (and hypocrites are compared to clouds without water, Jde 1:12) and the dew does not soak into the ground, but is drawn back again into the air, and the earth is parched still. What shall he do with them? Shall he accept their goodness? No, for it passes away; and factum non dicitur quod non perseverat - that which does not continue can scarcely be said to be done. Note, That goodness will never be either pleasing to God or profitable to ourselves which is as the morning cloud and the early dew. When men promise fair and do not perform, when they begin well in religion and do not hold on, when they leave their first love and their first works, or, though they do not quite cast off religion, are yet unsteady, uneven, and inconstant in it, then is their goodness as the morning cloud and the early dew. 2. What course God had taken with them (Hos 6:5): "Therefore, because they were so rough and ill-shapen, I have hewn them by the prophets, as timber or stone is hewn for use; I have slain them by the words of my mouth." What the prophets did was done by the word of God in their mouths, which never returned void. By it they thought themselves slain, were ready to say that the prophets killed them, or cut them to the heart when they dealt faithfully with them. (1.) The prophets hewed them by convictions of sin, endeavouring to cut off their transgressions from them. They were uneven in religion (Hos 6:4), therefore God hewed them. The hearts of sinners are not only as stone, but as rough stone, which requires a great deal of pains to bring it into shape, or as knotty timber, that is not squared without a great deal of difficulty; ministers' work is to hew them, and God by the minister hews them, for with the froward will he show himself froward. And there are those whom ministers must rebuke sharply; every word should cut, and though the chips fly in the face of the workman, though the reproved fly in the face of the reprover and reckon him an enemy because he tells the truth, yet he goes on with his work. (2.) They slew them by the denunciations of wrath, foretelling that they should be slain, as Ezekiel is said to destroy the city when he prophesied of the destruction of it, Eze 43:3. And God accomplished that which was foretold: "I have slain them by my judgments, according to the words of my mouth." Note, The word of God will be the death either of the sin or of the sinner, a savour either of life unto life or of death unto death. Some read it, "I have hewn the prophets, and slain them by the words of my mouth, that is, I have employed them in laborious service for the people's good, which has wasted their strength; they have spent themselves, and hews away all their spirits, in their work, and in hazardous service, which has cost many of them their lives." Note, Ministers are the tools which God makes use of in working upon people; and, though with many they labour in vain, yet God will reckon for the wearing out of his tools. (3.) God was hereby justified in the severest proceedings against them afterwards. His prophets had taken a great deal of pains with them, had admonished them of their sin and warned them of their danger, but the means used had not the desired effect; some good impressions perhaps were made for the present, but they wore off, and passed away as the morning cloud, and now they cannot charge God with severity if he bring upon them the miseries threatened. The prophet turns to him and acknowledges, Thy judgments are as the light that goes forth, evidently just and righteous. Note, Though sinners be not reclaimed by the pains that ministers take with them, yet thereby God will be justified when he speaks and clear when he judges. See Mat 11:17-19.

II. That they were not faithful to God's covenant with them, Hos 6:6, Hos 6:7. Here observe,

1.What the covenant was that God made with them, and upon what terms they should obtain his favour and be accepted of him (Hos 6:6): I desired mercy and not sacrifice (that is, rather than sacrifice), and insisted upon the knowledge of God more than upon burnt-offerings. Mercy here is the same word which in Hos 6:4 is rendered goodness - chesed - piety, sanctity; it is put for all practical religion; it is the same with charity in the New Testament, the reigning love of God and our neighbour, and this accompanied with and flowing from the knowledge of God, as he has revealed himself in his word, a firm belief that he is, and is the rewarder of those that diligently seek him, a good affection to divine things guided by a good judgment, which cannot but produce a very good conversation; this is that which God by his covenant requires, and not sacrifice and offering. This is fully explained, Jer 7:22, Jer 7:23. I spoke not to your fathers concerning burnt-offerings (that was the smallest of the matters I spoke to them of, and on which the least stress was laid), but this I said, Obey my voice, Mic 6:6-8. To love God and our neighbour is better than all burnt offering and sacrifice, Mar 12:33; Psa 51:16, Psa 51:17. Not but that sacrifice and offering were required, and to be paid, and had their use, and, when they were accompanied with mercy and the knowledge of God, were acceptable to him, but, without them, God regarded them not, he despised them, Isa 1:10, Isa 1:11. Perhaps this is mentioned here to show a difference between the God whom they deserted and the gods whom they went over to. The true God aimed at nothing but that they should be good men, and live good lives for their own good, and the ceremony of honouring him with sacrifices was one of the smallest matters of his law; whereas the false gods required that only; let their priests and altars be regaled with sacrifices and offerings, and the people might live as they listed. What fools were those then that left a God who aimed at giving his worshippers a new nature, for gods who aimed at nothing but making themselves a new name! It is mentioned likewise to show that God's controversy with them was not for the omission of sacrifices (I will not reprove thee for them, Psa 50:8), but because there was no justice, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God, among them (Hos 4:1), and to teach us all that the power of godliness is the main thing God looks at and requires, and without it the form of godliness is of no avail. Serious piety in the heart and life is the one thing needful, and, separate from that, the performances of devotion, though ever so plausible, ever so costly, are of no account. Our Saviour quotes this to show that moral duties are to be preferred before rituals whenever they come in competition, and to justify himself in eating with publicans and sinners, because it was in mercy to the souls of men, and in healing on the sabbath day, because it was in mercy to the bodies of men, to which the ceremony of singularity in eating and the sabbath-rest must give way, Mat 9:13; Mat 12:7.

2.How little they had regarded this covenant, though it was so well ordered in all things, though they, and not God, would be the gainers by it. See here what came of it.

(1.)In general, they broke with God, and proved unfaithful; there were good things committed to them to keep, the jewels of mercy and piety, and the knowledge of God, in the cabinet of sacrifice and burnt-offering, but they betrayed their trust, kept the cabinet, but pawned the jewels for the gratification of a base lust, and this is that for which God has justly a quarrel with them (Hos 6:7): They, like men, have transgressed the covenant, that covenant which God made with them; they have broken the conditions of it, and so forfeited the benefit of it. By casting off mercy and the knowledge of God, and other instances of disobedience, [1.] They had contracted the guilt of perjury and covenant-breaking; they were like men that transgress a covenant by which they had solemnly bound themselves, which is a thing that all the world cries out shame on; men that have done so deserve not again to be valued, or trusted, or dealt with. "There, in that thing, they have dealt treacherously against me; they have been perfidious, base, and false children, in whom is no faith, though I depended upon their being children that would not lie." [2.] In this they had but acted like themselves, like men, who are generally false and fickle, and in whose nature (their corrupt nature) it is to deal treacherously; all men are liars, and they are like the rest of that degenerate race, all gone aside, Psa 14:2, Psa 14:3. They have transgressed the covenant like men (like the Gentiles that transgressed the covenant of nature), like mean men (the word here used is sometimes put for men of low degree); they have dealt deceitfully, like base men that have no sense of honour. [3.] Herein they trod in the steps of our first parents: They, like Adam, have transgressed the covenant (so it might very well be read); as he transgressed the covenant of innocency, so they transgressed the covenant of grace, so treacherously, so foolishly; there in paradise he violated his engagements to God, and there in Canaan, another paradise, they violated their engagements. And by their treacherous dealing they, like Adam, have ruined themselves and theirs. Note, Sin is so much the worse the more there is in it of the similitude of Adam's transgression, Rom 5:14. [4.] Low thoughts of God and of his authority and favour were at the bottom of all this; for so some read it: They have transgressed the covenant, as of a man, as if it had been but the covenant of a man, that stood upon even ground with them, as if the commands of the covenant were but like those of a man like themselves, and the kindness conveyed by it no more valuable than that of a man. There is something sacred and binding in a man's covenant (as the apostle shows, Gal 3:15), but much more in the covenant of God, which yet they made small account of; and there in that covenant they dealt treacherously, promised fair, but performed nothing. Dealing treacherously with God is here called dealing treacherously against him, for it is both an affront and an opposition. Deserters are traitors, and will be so treated; the revolting heart is a rebellious heart.

(2.)Some particular instances of their treachery are here given: There they dealt treacherously, that is, in the places hereafter named [1.] Look on the other side Jordan, to the country which lay most exposed to the insults of the neighbouring nations, and where therefore the people were concerned to keep themselves under the divine protection, and yet there you will find the most daring provocations of the divine Majesty, Hos 6:8. Gilead, which lay in the lot of Gad and the half tribe of Manasseh, was a city of the workers of iniquity. Wickedness was the trade that was driven there; the country was called Gilead, but it was all called a city, because they were all as it were incorporated in one society of rebels against God. Or (as most think) Ramoth Gilead is the city here meant, one of the three cities of refuge on the other side Jordan, and a Levites' city; the inhabitants of it, though of the sacred tribe, were workers of iniquity, contrived it, and practised it. Note, It is bad indeed when a Levites' city is a city of those that work iniquity, when those that are to preach good doctrine live bad lives. Particularly it is polluted with blood, as if that were a sin which the wicked Levites were in a special manner guilty of. In popish countries the clergy are observed to be the most bloody persecutors. Or, as it was a city of refuge, by abusing the power it had to judge of murders it became polluted with blood. They would, for a bribe, protect those that were guilty of wilful murder, whom they ought to have put to death, and would deliver those to the avenger of blood who were guilty but of chance-medley, if they were poor and had nothing to give them; and both these ways they were polluted with blood. Note, Blood defiles the land where it is shed, and where no inquisition is made or no vengeance taken for it. See how the best institutions, that are ever so well designed to keep the balance even between justice and mercy, are capable of being abused and perverted to the manifest prejudice and violation of both. [2.] Look among those whose business it was to minister in holy things, and they were as bad as the worst and as vile as the vilest (Hos 6:9): The company of priests are so, not here and there one that is the scandal of his order, but the whole order and body of them, the priests go all one way by consent, with one shoulder (as the word is), one and all; and they make one another worse, more daring, and fierce, and impudent, in sin, more crafty and more cruel. A company of priests will say and do that in conspiracy which none of them would dare to say or do singly. The companies of priests were as troops of robbers, as banditti, or gangs of highwaymen, that cut men's throats to get their money. First, They were cruel and blood-thirsty. They murder those that they have a pique against, or that stand in their way; nothing less will satisfy them. Secondly, They were cunning. They laid wait for men, that they might have a fair opportunity to compass their mischievous malicious designs; thus the company of priests laid wait for Christ to take him, saying, Not on the feast-day. Thirdly, They were concurring as one man: They murder in the way; in the highway, where travellers should be safe, there they murder by consent, aiding and abetting one another in it. See how unanimous wicked people are in doing mischief; and should not good people be so then in doing good? They murder in the way to Shechem (so the margin reads it, as a proper name) such as were going to Jerusalem (for that way Shechem lay) to worship. Or in the way to Shechem (some think) means in the same manner that their father Levi, with Simeon his brother, murdered the Shechemites (Gen. 34), by fraud and deceit; and some understand it of their destroying the souls of men by drawing them to sin. Fourthly, They did it with contrivance: They commit lewdness; the word signifies such wickedness as is committed with deliberation, and of malice prepense, as we say. The more there is of device and design in sin the worse it is. [3.] Look into the body of the people, take a view of the whole house of Israel, and they are all alike (Hos 6:10): I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel, and, though it be ever so artfully managed, God discovers it, and will discover it to them; and who can deny that which God himself says that he has seen? There is the whoredom of Ephraim, both corporal and spiritual whoredom; there it is too plain to be denied. Note, The sin of sinners, especially sinners of the house of Israel, has enough in it to make them tremble, for it is a horrible thing, it is amazing, and it is threatening, enough to make them blush, for Israel is thereby defiled and rendered odious in the sight of God. [4.] Look into Judah, and you find them sharing with Israel (Hos 6:11): Also, O Judah! he has set a harvest for thee; thou must be reckoned with as well as Ephraim; thou art ripe for destruction too, and the time, even the set time, of thy destruction is hastening on, when thou that hast ploughed iniquity, and sown wickedness, shalt reap the same. The general judgment is compared to a harvest (Mat 13:39), so are particular judgments, Joe 3:13; Rev 14:15. I have appointed a time to call thee to account, even when I returned the captivity of my people, that is, when those captives of Judah which were taken by the men of Israel were restored, in obedience to the command of God sent them by Oded the prophet, Ch2 28:8-15. When God spared them that time he set them a harvest, that is, he designed to reckon with them another time for all together. Note, Preservations from present judgments, if a good use be not made of them, are but reservations for greater judgments.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 4–11. Public domain.
Copy as
Clement of AlexandriaAD 215
Who is the Rich Man that Shall Be Saved?
For to every one who has turned to God in truth and with a whole heart, the doors are open, and the thrice-glad Father receives his truly repentant child. And true repentance is to be no longer bound in the same sins for which he denounced death against himself, but to eradicate them completely from the soul. For on their uprooting God takes up his abode again in you. For it is said there is great and exceeding joy and festivity in the heavens with the Father and the angels when one sinner turns and repents. This is why he cries, “I will have mercy, and not sacrifice.”
TertullianAD 220
ON PENITENCE 8
But he would not threaten the impenitent if he failed to pardon the penitent. This would be doubtful only if he had not revealed elsewhere the profusion of his mercy. Has he not said, “He who is fallen shall rise, and he who was turned away shall return”? He it is, most assuredly, who “will have mercy rather than sacrifice.” The heavens and the angels who are there rejoice at human repentance. Look at you now, sinner, be of good heart! You see where it is that you are a cause of joy.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
Letter 51:15
For the Word of God Himself tells us that He prefers the performance of His commandments to the offering of sacrifice. God proclaims this, Moses declares it to the people, Paul preaches it to the Gentiles. Do that which you understand is most profitable for the time. "I prefer mercy," it is said, "rather than sacrifice." Are they not, then, rather Christians in truth who condemn their own sin, than they who think to defend it? "The just is an accuser of himself in the beginning of his words." He who accuses himself when he has sinned is just, not he who praises himself.
John ChrysostomAD 407
HOMILIES ON REPENTANCE AND ALMSGIVING 10:5.22
Great is the principle of mercy to God. Not only his to us, but also that issuing from us to our fellow servants. In the Old Testament and the New, God lays down innumerable laws pertaining to this matter. He orders us to be benevolent continually in all quarters, through words, money and deeds. And Moses throughout—up and down, here and there—scatters words about these matters in all his legislations. And in the person of God the prophets shout, “I desire mercy, and not sacrifice.” And all the apostles act and speak in harmony with these prophetic words. Therefore let us not neglect the matter. By mercy we greatly benefit ourselves, not the poor only. We receive much more than we provide.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Hosea 6:6-7
For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice: and the knowledge of God more than holocausts; but they themselves like Adam have transgressed the covenant: there they have prevaricated against me." LXX: "For I desire mercy, and not sacrifice, and the knowledge of God more than holocausts: but they themselves are like a man passing by the covenant." What follows in the Septuagint: "There hath despised me the city of Galaad, the vain-doer," and the rest, is to be connected with the following chapter: we will discuss what we have proposed: I have grieved them in my prophets, I have slain them with the words of my mouth: I have struck them with hard punishments, so that I might have mercy on the repentant, that I might extend my hand to those who have fallen and risen. For I am not pleased with sacrifices and offerings, and the multitude of burnt offerings. My sacrifice and offerings, the salvation of believers, and the conversion of sinners is. But they imitated Adam, and disregarding my covenant and law, they did on earth what he had done in paradise. And there, that is, in paradise, all have transgressed against me, in the likeness of Adam's transgression. For it is not surprising that what preceded in the parent should also be condemned in their children. Every day God calls those who are outside the Church and those who sin while dwelling in the Church to repentance, and says to them: "I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and knowledge of God rather than holocausts." But they offer sacred bread and give alms, and seem to pursue humility: this I interpret as holocausts, if they are truly done. However, when they have abandoned knowledge of God, they boast in vain of having the rest of the members, with the head of faith cut off, for they have transgressed the covenant of God in the Church, just as Adam transgressed it in Paradise; and they show themselves to be imitators of that ancient parent, so that just as he was cast out of Paradise, so they may also be cast out of the Church.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
COMMENTARY ON HOSEA 6:6–7
Whereas I [the Lord] have no need of sacrifices, I accept them out of considerateness for the limitations of your way of thinking. These two things, on the contrary, I do require: the right disposition toward me and lovingkindness toward the neighbor, these also being the first obligations I imposed, “You will love the Lord your God with your whole heart, your whole soul, your whole mind and your whole strength; and you will love your neighbor as yourself.” But whereas I imposed these obligations, they resembled someone breaking agreements made by him with somebody else. In similar fashion, in fact, they despised my longsuffering and trampled on the laws given them.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Hosea 6:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.