Acts 4:32
“Unity and Generosity in the Church”Acts 4:32–37
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- ΤοῦTou[the]G3588T-GSNDefinite article Genitive Singular Neuter
- δὲdeAndG1161CONJConjunction
- πλήθουςplēthousthe multitudeG4128N-GSNNoun Genitive Singular Neuter
- τῶνtōnwhoG3588T-GPMDefinite article Genitive Plural Masculine
- πιστευσάντωνpisteusantōnhaving believedG4100V-AAP-GPMVerb Aorist Active Participle Genitive Plural Masculine
- ἦνēnwere [in]G1510V-IAI-3SVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- ἡhē[the]G3588T-NSFDefinite article Nominative Singular Feminine
- καρδίαkardiaheartG2588N-NSFNoun Nominative Singular Feminine
- καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
- ἡhē[the]G3588T-NSFDefinite article Nominative Singular Feminine
- ψυχὴpsuchēsoulG5590N-NSFNoun Nominative Singular Feminine
- μία·miaoneG1520A-NSFAdjective Nominative Singular Feminine
- καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
- οὐδὲoudenotG3761CONJ-NConjunction Negative
- εἷςheisoneG1520A-NSMAdjective Nominative Singular Masculine
- τιtianythingG5100X-ASNIndefinite pronoun Accusative Singular Neuter
- τῶνtōnof theG3588T-GPNDefinite article Genitive Plural Neuter
- ὑπαρχόντωνhuparchontōnpossessionsG5225V-PAP-GPNVerb Present Active Participle Genitive Plural Neuter
- αὐτῷautōto himG846P-DSMPersonal pronoun Dative Singular Masculine
- ἔλεγενelegenwas claimingG3004V-IAI-3SVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- ἴδιονidion[his] ownG2398A-ASNAdjective Accusative Singular Neuter
- εἶναιeinaito beG1511V-PANVerb Present Active Infinitive
- ἀλλ᾽all᾽butG235CONJConjunction
- ἦνēnwereG1510V-IAI-3SVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- αὐτοῖςautoisto themG846P-DPMPersonal pronoun Dative Plural Masculine
- ἅπανταhapantaall thingsG537A-NPNAdjective Nominative Plural Neuter
- κοινάkoinain commonG2839A-NPNAdjective Nominative Plural Neuter
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era map

Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Acts 4:32–37. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
We have a general idea given us in these verses, and it is a very beautiful one, of the spirit and state of this truly primitive church; it is conspectus saeculi - a view of that age of infancy and innocence.
I.The disciples loved one another dearly.
Behold, how good and how pleasant it was to see how the multitude of those that believed were of one heart, and of one soul (Acts 4:32), and there was no such thing as discord nor division among them. Observe here,
1.There were multitudes that believed; even in Jerusalem, where the malignant influence of the chief priests was most strong, there were three thousand converted on one day, and five thousand on another, and, besides these, there were added to the church daily; and no doubt they were all baptized, and made profession of the faith; for the same Spirit that endued the apostles with courage to preach the faith of Christ endued them with courage to confess it. Note, The increase of the church is the glory of it, and the multitude of those that believe, more than their quality. Now the church shines, and her light is come, when souls thus fly like a cloud into her bosom, and like doves to their windows, Isaiah 60:1, Isaiah 60:8.
2.They were all of one heart, and of one soul. Though there were many, very many, of different ages, tempers, and conditions, in the world, who perhaps, before they believed, were perfect strangers to one another, yet, when they met in Christ, they were as intimately acquainted as if they had known one another many years. Perhaps they had been of different sects among the Jews, before their conversion, or had had discords upon civil accounts; but now these were all forgotten and laid aside, and they were unanimous in the faith of Christ, and, being all joined to the Lord, they were joined to one another in holy love. This was the blessed fruit of Christ's dying precept to his disciples, to love one another, and his dying prayer for them, that they all might be one. We have reason to think they divided themselves into several congregations, or worshipping assemblies, according as their dwellings were, under their respective ministers; and yet this occasioned no jealousy or uneasiness; for they were all of one heart, and one soul, notwithstanding; and loved those of other congregations as truly as those of their own. Thus it was then, and we may not despair of seeing it so again, when the Spirit shall be poured out upon us from on high.
II.The ministers went on in their work with great vigour and success (Acts 4:33):
With great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. The doctrine they preached was, the resurrection of Christ: a matter of fact, which served not only for the confirmation of the truth of Christ's holy religion, but being duly explained and illustrated, with the proper inferences from it, served for a summary of all the duties, privileges, and comforts of Christians. The resurrection of Christ, rightly understood and improved, will let us into the great mysteries of religion. By the great power wherewith the apostles attested the resurrection may be meant,
1.The great vigour, spirit, and courage, with which they published and avowed this doctrine; they did it not softly and diffidently, but with liveliness and resolution, as those that were themselves abundantly satisfied of the truth of it, and earnestly desired that others should be so too. Or,
2.The miracles which they wrought to confirm their doctrine. With works of great power, they gave witness to the resurrection of Christ, God himself, in them, bearing witness too.
III.The beauty of the Lord our God shone upon them, and all their performances:
Great grace was upon them all, not only all the apostles, but all the believers, charis megalē - grace that had something great in it (magnificent and very extraordinary) was upon them all.
1.Christ poured out abundance of grace upon them, such as qualified them for great services, by enduing them with great power; it came upon them from on high, from above.
2.There were evident fruits of this grace in all they said and did, such as put an honour upon them, and recommended them to the favour of God, as being in his sight of great price.
3.Some think it includes the favour they were in with the people. Every one saw a beauty and excellency in them, and respected them.
IV.They were very liberal to the poor, and dead to this world.
This was as great an evidence of the grace of God in them as any other, and recommended them as much to the esteem of the people.
1.They insisted not upon property, which even children seem to have a sense of and a jealousy for, and which worldly people triumph in, as Laban (Genesis 31:43): All that thou seest is mine; and Nabal (1 Samuel 25:11): My bread and my water. These believers were so taken up with the hopes of an inheritance in the other world that this was as nothing to them. No man said that aught of the things which he possessed was his own, Acts 4:32. They did not take away property, but they were indifferent to it. They did not call what they had their own, in a way of pride and vainglory, boasting of it, or trusting in it. They did not call it their own, because they had, in affection, forsaken all for Christ, and were continually expecting to be stripped of all for their adherence to him. They did not say that aught was their own; for we can call nothing our own but sin. What we have in the world is more God's than our own; we have it from him, must use it for him, and are accountable for it to him. No man said that what he had was his own, idion - his peculiar; for he was ready to distribute, willing to communicate, and desired not to eat his morsel alone, but what he had to spare from himself and family his poor neighbours were welcome to. Those that had estates were not solicitous to lay up, but very willing to lay out, and would straiten themselves to help their brethren. No marvel that they were of one heart and soul, when they sat so loose to the wealth of this world; for meum - mine, and tuum - thine, are the great makebates. Men's holding their own, and grasping at more than their own, are the rise of wars and fightings.
2.They abounded in charity, so that, in effect, they had all things common; for (Acts 4:34) there was not any among them that lacked, but care was taken for their supply. Those that had been maintained upon the public charity were probably excluded when they turned Christians, and therefore it was fit that the church should take care of them. As there were many poor that received the gospel, so there were some rich that were able to maintain them, and the grace of God made them willing. Those that gather much have nothing over, because what they have over they have for those who gather little, that they may have no lack, 2 Corinthians 8:14, 2 Corinthians 8:15. The gospel hath laid all things common, not so that the poor are allowed to rob the rich, but so that the rich are appointed to relieve the poor.
3.They did many of them sell their estates, to raise a fund for charity: As many as had possession of lands or houses sold them, Acts 4:34. Dr. Lightfoot computes that this was the year of jubilee in the Jewish nation, the fiftieth year (the twenty-eighth since they settled in Canaan fourteen hundred years ago), so that, what was sold that year being not to return till the next jubilee, lands then took a good price, and so the sale of those lands would raise the more money. Now,
(1.)We are here told what they did with the money that was so raised: They laid it at the apostles' feet - the left it to them to be disposed of as they thought fit; probably they had their support from it; for whence else could they have it? Observe, The apostles would have it laid at their feet, in token of their holy contempt of the wealth of the world; they thought it fitter it should be laid at their feet than lodged in their hands or in their bosoms. Being laid there, it was not hoarded up, but distribution was made, by proper persons, unto every man according as he had need. Great care ought to be taken in the distribution of public charity,
[1.]That it be given to such as have need; such as are not able to procure a competent maintenance of themselves, through age, infancy, sickness, or bodily disability, or incapacity of mind, want either of ingenuity or activity, cross providences, losses, oppressions, or a numerous charge. Those who upon any of these accounts, or any other, have real need, and have not relations of their own to help them - but, above all, those that are reduced to want for well doing, and for the testimony of a good conscience, ought to be taken care of, and provided for, and, with such a prudent application of what is given, as may be most for their benefit.
[2.]That it be given to every man for whom it is intended, according as he has need, without partiality or respect of persons. It is a rule in dispensing charity, as well as in administering justice, ut parium par sit ratio - that those who are equally needy and equally deserving should be equally helped, and that the charity should be suited and adapted to the necessity, as the word is.
(2.)Here is one particular person mentioned that was remarkable for this generous charity: it was Barnabas, afterwards Paul's colleague. Observe,
[1.]The account here given concerning him, Acts 4:36. His name was Joses; he was of the tribe of Levi, for there were Levites among the Jews of the dispersion, who, it is probable, presided in their synagogue - worship, and, according to the duty of that tribe, taught them the good knowledge of the Lord. He was born in Cyprus, a great way off from Jerusalem, his parents, though Jews, having a settlement there. Notice is taken of the apostles' changing his name after he associated with them. It is probable that he was one of the seventy disciples, and, as he increased in gifts and graces, grew eminent, and was respected by the apostles, who, in token of their value for him, gave him a name, Barnabas - the son of prophecy (so it properly signifies), he being endued with extraordinary gifts of prophecy. But the Hellenist Jews (saith Grotius) called praying paraklēsis, and therefore by that word it is rendered here: A son of exhortation (so some), one that had an excellent faculty of healing and persuading; we have an instance of it, Acts 11:22-24. A son of consolation (so we read it); one that did himself walk very much in the comforts of the Holy Ghost - a cheerful Christian, and this enlarged his heart in charity to the poor; or one that was eminent for comforting the Lord's people, and speaking peace to wounded troubled consciences; he had an admirable facility that way. There were two among the apostles that were called Boanerges - sons of thunder (Mark 3:17); but here was a son of consolation with them. Each had his several gift. Neither must censure the other, but both case one another; let the one search the wound, and then let the other heal it and bind it up.
[2.]Here is an account of his charity, and great generosity to the public fund. This is particularly taken notice of, because of the eminency of his services afterwards in the church of God, especially in carrying the gospel to the Gentiles; and, that this might not appear to come from any ill-will to his own nation, we have here his benevolence to the Jewish converts. Or perhaps this is mentioned because it was a leading card, and an example to others: He having land, whether in Cyprus, where he was born, or in Judea, where he now lived, or elsewhere, is not certain, but he sold it, not to buy elsewhere to advantage, but, as a Levite indeed, who knew he had the Lord God of Israel for his inheritance, he despised earthly inheritances, would be encumbered no more with them, but brought the money, and laid it at the apostles' feet, to be given in charity. Thus, as one that was designed to be a preacher of the gospel, he disentangled himself from the affairs of this life: and he lost nothing upon the balance of the account, by laying the purchase-money at the apostles' feet, when he himself was, in effect, numbered among the apostles, by that word of the Holy Ghost, Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them, Acts 13:2. Thus, for the respect he showed to the apostles as apostles, he had an apostle's reward.
Historical interpretation
Six Centuries of Reception
20 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Thou shalt not turn away from him that is in want, but thou shalt share all things with thy brother, and shalt not say that they are thine own; for if ye are partakers in that which is immortal, how much more in things which are mortal?
And Joseph, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas (which is, being interpreted, the son of consolation), a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus, having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles' feet; "
Besides, as you read in the Acts of the Apostles, "There was at that time among them that believed one heart and one soul; neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common."
"Blessed," says He, "are the peacemakers; for they shall be called the sons of God." [Matthew 5:9] It behooves the sons of God to be peacemakers, gentle in heart, simple in speech, agreeing in affection, faithfully linked to one another in the bonds of unanimity.
This unanimity formerly prevailed among the apostles; and thus the new assembly of believers, keeping the Lord's commandments, maintained its charity. Divine Scripture proves this, when it says, "But the multitude of them which believed were of one heart and of one soul." [Acts 4:32] And again: "These all continued with one mind in prayer with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with His brethren." [Acts 1:14] And thus they prayed with effectual prayers; thus they were able with confidence to obtain whatever they asked from the Lord's mercy.
For,-which the more induced and constrained me to write this letter to you,-you ought to know (since the Lord has condescended to show and to reveal it) that it was said in a vision, "Ask, and ye shall obtain." Then, afterwards, that the attending people were bidden to pray for certain persons pointed out to them, but that in their petitions there were dissonant voices, and wills disagreeing, and that this excessively displeased Him who had said, "Ask, and ye shall obtain," because the disagreement of the people was out of harmony, and there was not a consent of the brethren one and simple, and a united concord; since it is written, "God who maketh men to be of one mind in a house; " and we read in the Acts of the Apostles, "And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul." And the Lord has bidden us with His own voice, saying, "This is my command, that ye love one another." And again, "I say unto you, that if two of you shall agree on earth as touching anything that you shall ask, it shall be done for you of my Father which is in heaven." But if two of one mind can do so much, what might be effected if the unanimity prevailed among all? But if, according to the peace which our Lord gave us, there were agreement among all brethren, we should before this have obtained from the divine mercy what we seek; nor should we be wavering so long in this peril of our salvation and our faith. Yes, truly, and these evils would not have come upon the brethren, if the brotherhood had been animated with one spirit.
That charity and brotherly affection are to be religiously and stedfastly practised. In Malachi: "Hath not one God created us? Is there not one Father of us all? Why have ye certainly deserted every one his brother? " Of this same thing according to John: "Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you." Also in the same place: "This is my commandment, That ye love one another, even as I have loved you. Greater love than this has no man, than that one should lay down his life for his friends." Also in the same place: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the sons of God." Also in the same place: "Verily I say unto you, That if two of you shall agree on earth concerning everything, whatever you shall ask it shall be given you from my Father which is in heaven. For wherever two or three are gathered together in my name, I am with them." Of this same thing in the first Epistle to the Corinthians: "And I indeed, brethren, could not speak unto you as to spiritual, but as to carnal, as to babes in Christ. I have given you milk for drink, not meat: for while ye were yet little ye were not able to bear it, neither now are ye able. For ye are still carnal: for where there are in you emulation, and strife, and dissensions, are ye not carnal, and walk after man? " Likewise in the same place: "And if I should have all faith, so that I can remove mountains, but have not charity, I am nothing. And if I should distribute all my goods for food, and if I should deliver up my body to be burned, but have not charity, I avail nothing. Charity is great-souled; charity is kind; charity envieth not; charity dealeth not falsely; is not puffed up; is not irritated; thinketh not evil; rejoiceth not in injustice, but rejoiceth in the truth. It loveth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, beareth all things. Charity shall never fail." Of this same thing to the Galatians: "Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. But if ye bite and accuse one another, see that ye be not consumed one of another." Of this same thing in the Epistle of John: "In this appear the children of God and the children of the devil. Whosoever is not righteous is not of God, and he who loveth not his brother. For he who hateth his brother is a murderer; and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him." Also in the same place: "If any one shall say that he loves God, and hates his brother, he is a liar: for he who loveth not his brother whom he seeth, how can he love God whom he seeth not? " Of this same thing in the Acts of the Apostles: "But the multitude of them that had believed acted with one soul and mind: nor was there among them any distinction, neither did they esteem as their own anything of the possessions that they had; but all things were common to them." Of this same thing in the Gospel according to Matthew: If thou wouldest offer thy gift at the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee; leave thou thy gift before the altar, and go; first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift at the altar." Also in the Epistle of John: "God is love l and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him." Also in the same place: "He who saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is a liar, and walketh in darkness even until now."
Let us consider, beloved brethren, what the congregation of believers did in the time of the apostles, when at the first beginnings the mind flourished with greater virtues, when the faith of believers burned with a warmth of faith as yet new. Then they sold houses and farms, and gladly and liberally presented to the apostles the proceeds to be dispensed to the poor; selling and alienating their earthly estate, they transferred their lands thither where they might receive the fruits of an eternal possession, and there prepared homes where they might begin an eternal habitation. Such, then, was the abundance in labours, as was the agreement in love, as we read in the Acts of the Apostles: "And the multitude of them that believed acted with one heart and one soul; neither was there any distinction among them, nor did they esteem anything their own of the goods which belonged to them, but they had all things common." This is truly to become sons of God by spiritual birth; this is to imitate by the heavenly law the equity of God the Father. For whatever is of God is common in our use; nor is any one excluded from His benefits and His gifts, so as to prevent the whole human race from enjoying equally the divine goodness and liberality. Thus the day equally enlightens, the sun gives radiance, the rain moistens, the wind blows, and the sleep is one to those that sleep, and the splendour of the stars and of the moon is common. In which example of equality, he who, as a possessor in the earth, shares his returns and his fruits with the fraternity, while he is common and just in his gratuitous bounties, is an imitator of God the Father.
For he said that experience was needed in order to distinguish between cases of genuine need and of mere greedy begging. For whoever gives to the afflicted gives to the Lord and from the Lord shall have his reward; but he who gives to every vagabond casts to a dog, a nuisance indeed from his importunity but deserving no pity on the ground of need.
The Christian ought to regard all the things that are given him for his use, not as his to hold as his own or to lay up. Moreover, giving careful heed to all things as the Lord’s, he should not overlook any of the things that are being thrown aside and disregarded, should this be the case. No Christian should think of himself as his own master, but each should rather so think and act as though given by God to be slave to his fellow brothers and sisters. But “every person in his own order.”
Do you see that together with the grace of God they also contributed their part? For everywhere it ought to be well observed, that together with the grace of God they do their part likewise. Just as Peter said above, "Silver and gold have I none"; and again, that "they were all together." But in this place, having mentioned that they were heard, the sacred writer proceeds to speak also of them, what virtue they showed. Moreover, he is just about to enter upon the narrative of Sapphira and Ananias, and with a view to show the detestable conduct of that pair, he first discourses of the noble behavior of the rest.
And not this only, but also because love is increased by the gathering [of ourselves] together; and love being increased, of necessity the things of God must follow also. “And earnest prayer” (it is said) was “made by” the people. “As the manner of some is.” Here he not only exhorted but also blamed [them].“And let us consider one another,” he says, “to provoke to love and to good works.” He knew that this also arises from “gathering together.” For as “iron sharpens iron,” so also association increases love. For if a stone rubbed against a stone sends forth fire, how much more soul mingled with soul! But not to emulation (he says), but “to the sharpening of love.” What is “to the sharpening of love”? To the loving and being loved more. “And of good works,” that so they might acquire zeal. For if doing has greater force for instruction than speaking, you also have in your number many teachers who effect this by their deeds.
Great, you perceive, is the virtue of this thing, seeing their was need of this grace even in that Company. For this is the foundation of all that is good, this of which he now for the second time makes mention, exhorting all men to the contempt of riches: "Neither said any of them that aught of the things he possessed was his own," "but they had all things common." For that this was in consequence not merely of the miraculous signs, but of their own purpose, is manifest by the case of Sapphira and Ananias.
Thus they had all things and had nothing: for “they said that none of the things which they possessed was their own”; therefore all things were theirs. For he that considers all things to be common will not only use his own but also the things of others as if they belonged to him. But whoever divides things up and sets himself as master over only his own things will not be master even of these. And this is plain from an example. He who possesses nothing at all, neither house nor table nor garment to spare, but for God’s sake is bereft of all, uses the things which are in common as his own; and he shall receive from all whatsoever he may desire, and thus he that has nothing possesses the things of all. But whoever has some things will not be master even of these. For first, no one will give to him who has possessions; and, second, his property shall belong to robbers and thieves and informers and changing events and be anybody’s rather than his.
Now say, did their love beget their poverty, or the poverty the love? In my opinion, the love begat the poverty, and then the poverty drew tight the cords of love. For observe what he says: "They were all of one heart and of one soul." Behold, heart and soul are what make the "together." "Neither said any of them that aught of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common."
If love made one soul of so many souls and one heart of so many hearts, how great must be the love between the Father and the Son! Surely it must be greater than that between those people who had one heart. If, then, the heart of many brothers was one by charity, if the soul of many sisters was one by charity, would you say that God the Father and God the Son are two? If they are two Gods, there is not the highest charity between them. For if love is here so great as to make your soul and your friend’s soul one soul, how can it be, then, that the Father and the Son are not one God? Let true faith banish the thought. In short, understand from this how excellent that love is: the souls of many people are many, and if they love one another, it is one soul; still, in the case of people, they may be called many souls, because the union is not so strong. But there it is right for you to say one God; two or three Gods it is not right for you to say. From this, the supreme and surpassing excellence of love is shown to you to be such that a greater cannot be.
For … the love that God puts in people makes one heart of many hearts and makes the many souls of people into one soul, as it is written of them that believed and mutually loved one another, in the Acts of the Apostles, “They had one soul and one heart toward God.” If, therefore, my soul and your soul become one soul, when we think the same thing and love one another, how much more must God the Father and God the Son be one God in the fountain of love!
Of this high-souled humility the Apostles first, after the Lord, have given us example, who, leaving all that they had without difference at the voice of the heavenly Master, were turned by a ready change from the catching of fish to be fishers of men, and made many like themselves through the imitation of their faith, when with those first-begotten sons of the Church, "the heart of all was one, and the spirit one, of those that believed": for they, putting away the whole of their things and possessions, enriched themselves with eternal goods, through the most devoted poverty, and in accordance with the Apostles' preaching rejoiced to have nothing of the world and possess all things with Christ.
Hence it is that any creatures, that is, of the same nature, can be separated from one another because each one individually cannot be everywhere in its entirety; for when, through the grace of faith it happens that they have “one heart and soul of the multitude of believers,” still in their persons they can be separated by being in different places even though they are not separated by the affection of the heart; and some of the faithful can become unbelievers and be severed from the fellowship of that one soul.
And the multitude of believers was of one heart and one soul. Those who had completely abandoned the world did not boast of their noble lineage, preferring one another, but being as if born from the womb of one and the same mother, the Church, all rejoiced in the same love of brotherhood.
But they had all things in common. In Latin, "common" is said as "communia," which in Greek is called κοινὰ, from which it is understood that the perfect servants of God are called κοινοβίται in Greek, that is, those living in common, and their communal dwellings are called κοινόβια; for in their language, βίον is understood to mean life, not that life which is contrary to death, but the way of life someone leads in their conversation, whether in the military, or in agriculture, or in any honorable or dishonorable art, whether one is a monk, layperson, or cleric. However, the life by which we are distinguished from the dead is called ζωὴ by the Greeks. Therefore, those who live in such a way that all things are common to them in the Lord are rightly called κοινοβῖται, a name composed from two words. This life is certainly so much happier than other ways of living in this world, as it imitates the state of the future world even in the present, where all good things are common to the blessed, who see His glory from whom all good things come; and because there the highest grace of peace and security reigns, the city in which this way of life was first typified was rightly called Jerusalem, that is, the Vision of Peace. Hence, the distance of things and places is noteworthy, seeing that in the work of the prideful tower, the language and mind of the human race, when they were one, were deservedly scattered due to iniquity, so that although people spoke all languages there, no one could understand the will or words of their neighbor. However, in Jerusalem, the same languages were united by the merit of humility, and there was one language, one will, and one soul among all. This indeed continues to this day throughout the whole world, while the elect serve the Lord with one and undivided heart and intention amidst the manifold division of languages; but indeed the reprobates all serve the devil in such a way that the same service is carried out with mutual conflict and contention, because of which their city is rightly called Babylon, that is, confusion.
Continue studying Acts 4:32 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The whole company of believers is of one heart and one soul, and nobody calls his goods his own, because they hold all things in common.
“And the multitude of them that believed”
The whole body of believers, by now a great number, spoken of as one company.
“were of one heart and of one soul:”
kardía and psychḗ together: one in thought, will and life, the fruit of the filling with the Holy Ghost in verse 31.
“neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own;”
“Ought” means anything. The weight falls on how they spoke of their goods and held them.
“but they had all things common.”
koinós, shared and open to all, the same way of life Luke described in Acts 2:44–45.
Passage studyActs 4:32–37
One Heart, One Soul, All Things Common
Summary
After the believers in Jerusalem pray and are all filled with the Holy Ghost, Luke shows us the church the Spirit has made. The whole multitude are of one heart and of one soul, and nobody calls anything he owns his own. The apostles bear witness to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus with great power, and great grace rests on them all. Those who own lands or houses sell them and lay the money at the apostles’ feet, and it is handed out to each as he has need, so that nobody among them lacks. Then Luke names one of the givers, Joses, a Levite from Cyprus, whom the apostles call Barnabas, “The son of consolation”. In six verses we see what the risen Christ makes of a people when his Spirit fills them: one heart toward God and toward one another, and open hands.
How the believers were of one heart and of one soul
This picture of the church follows straight on from a prayer. Peter and John had been released by the council, and the believers asked God for boldness to speak his word. Then “the place was shaken where they were assembled together; and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost” (Acts 4:29–31). The unity of verse 32 is the fruit of that filling. Luke had described the same shared life just after Pentecost, when all who believed were together and had all things common (Acts 2:44–45), and here it still marks the church as the number of believers grows.
“The multitude of them that believed” means the great number who had come to faith in Jesus, and Luke speaks of them all together. He says they were one in two ways. The heart, kardía, is the centre of a person’s thoughts, intentions and will, where he understands and decides. The soul, psychḗ, is breath or spirit, the life that animates a person. Put together, “of one heart and of one soul” means that the believers were one in what they thought, chose and lived for. The Holy Spirit made this oneness among them, and it reached all the way into how they used what they owned.
Jesus had prayed for exactly this, asking the Father that all who believed on him would be one, so that the world would believe the Father had sent him (John 17:20–23). The church in Jerusalem is an answer to that prayer. Paul later describes believers as many members in one body (Romans 12:4–5), and he urges them to share one mind and to look to the things of others as well as their own (Philippians 2:1–4). By his death Christ broke down the wall that divided people from one another and made them one (Ephesians 2:14), and these verses show that new people living together, reconciled to God and to each other.
What “they had all things common” meant
The second half of verse 32 shows the unity at work. “Neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own”: “ought” is the old word for anything at all. The things he possessed, hypárchonta, are things at hand, a person’s goods and property. Luke speaks of what the believers said about their goods and how they regarded them. Each still had his own things, and each held them as there for the rest whenever a brother or sister needed them.
The word common, koinós, means shared by all or several. Having all things common meant that what they had was open to all of them and used for all, so the shared life in the Spirit that the New Testament calls fellowship, koinonia, became a shared life in material things as well. It was given freely, out of love, as each was moved.
Israel’s law already had care for the needy built into it, through the tithe and through the gleaning laws, which left part of every harvest for the poor (Leviticus 19:9–10). Charity, tzedakah, was a duty of religion, and covenant kindness, hesed, runs through the Old Testament. The Essenes, a Jewish sect, lived with their goods held in common. What happened in Jerusalem grew from that soil and had marks of its own. It was freely given, it overflowed from the Spirit’s work in people who had believed the gospel, and the apostles had a central part in handing it out. Many of the new converts, some from far away, may well have been short of means, and some may have lost work or family for their faith, and the church met their need from what its members had.
Was the early church practising communism?
What Luke describes is believers who chose freely, moved by the Spirit and by love, to sell what they owned and share it with brothers and sisters in need. Peter says as much to Ananias about the land he sold: “Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power?” (Acts 5:4). Property was still owned, owners sold as each was moved to, and the money went to each according to his need. The sharing rested on love inside a family of faith, it was given from the heart, and it left each owner free, as Peter’s words show. A system imposed by a state or a ruling party, or a decree abolishing private property, has no place in Luke’s account.
Is having all things common a command for every church?
Luke gives this as an account of what the Spirit did in the church at Jerusalem, and the rest of the New Testament carries its heart to every church. Paul asks the Corinthians to give out of their abundance for the want of others, so that there may be equality (2 Corinthians 8:13–15). He tells the Romans to distribute to the necessity of the saints and to be given to hospitality (Romans 12:13), and the Galatians to do good to all, especially to the household of faith (Galatians 6:10). James asks what good it does to send away a brother who is cold and hungry with kind words alone (James 2:15–16), and John asks how the love of God can dwell in someone who sees his brother in need and shuts up his compassion, and tells us to love “in deed and in truth” (1 John 3:16–18). Each gives as he purposes in his heart, “for God loveth a cheerful giver” (2 Corinthians 9:7). God may call some, like these owners, to sell lands and houses. The call to all of us is to hold our goods loosely, to share them, and to see that those in the church who are in want are cared for.
Great power and great grace
The apostles had just stood before the Sanhedrin, Israel’s highest religious court, after the healing of a lame man at the gate of the temple (Acts 3:6–10, Acts 4:8–20). The authorities counted the preaching of a crucified and risen Messiah as blasphemy and a threat to their order and influence. Some in Israel, among them the Pharisees, believed in a resurrection, but to say that a man executed as a criminal had risen was fiercely disputed. Bearing witness to it put the apostles at risk of further persecution, prison or even death, and they bore it all the same.
“With great power” uses dýnamis, which means strength, ability, or power to do mighty works. In Acts it goes with the Holy Spirit’s enabling for ministry, signs and miracles. Jesus had promised it: “ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me” (Acts 1:8), and it came at Pentecost (Acts 2:1–4). The apostles’ preaching had God’s own might behind it, carrying on the authority with which Jesus himself had taught (Matthew 7:29).
Their “witness”, martýrion, is testimony or evidence. The apostles were witnesses (martyres) in the plainest sense, because they had seen the Lord after he rose, and Peter named being a witness of his resurrection as the mark of an apostle (Acts 1:21–22). The English word “martyr” comes from the same family of Greek words.
The resurrection was the heart of what they said. Paul gives it as part of the gospel he received, that Christ died for our sins, was buried, and rose again the third day (1 Corinthians 15:3–4). If Christ be not risen, he says, our preaching is vain and our faith is vain (1 Corinthians 15:14), and we are yet in our sins (1 Corinthians 15:17). By the resurrection Jesus was declared to be the Son of God with power (Romans 1:4), and the gospel that proclaims him “is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth” (Romans 1:16).
“And great grace was upon them all.” Grace, cháris, is graciousness, favour and gift, and the word reaches to God’s work on the heart and the way it shows in a life. Luke puts it “upon them all”, so the whole church shared it with the apostles. It is the grace that came to us in Jesus, “full of grace and truth” (John 1:14), the grace of the God who is rich in mercy (Ephesians 2:4–7) and by which we are saved through faith (Ephesians 2:8–9). Here it shows in their unity, their generosity and their courage under pressure, the same common life Luke describes in Acts 2:42–47. Luke calls the power “great” and the grace “great”, and both are the Greek mégas. God’s power sent the apostles out to preach, and his grace held the church together at home, so the giving of the next two verses flows from the witness and grace of this one.
How every need in the church was met
“Neither was there any among them that lacked” gives the result. The word for lacked, endeḗs, means deficient or in want. In a city where poverty was common, the believers met the needs of everyone in their fellowship. Moses had told Israel that the LORD would bless them so that there should be no poor among them (Deuteronomy 15:4), and he told them to open their hand wide to a poor brother and lend him enough for his need (Deuteronomy 15:7–8). In the church at Jerusalem that care for the poor was lived out in full.
The word “for” gives the reason. A possessor, ktḗtōr, is an owner, and owning lands or houses marked a person of real wealth and standing. These were people of means, and they “sold them”, pōléō, the plain word for selling. Turning a field or a house into money is a large step, and they took it so that the money could meet the needs of others. “As many as” takes in owners throughout the church, and Peter’s words to Ananias show that each of them gave of his own free will.
They brought “the prices of the things that were sold”, the money from each sale, and “laid them down at the apostles’ feet”. To lay, títhēmi, is to place, put or set something down, and the foot, poús, is the ordinary word for a foot. Then “distribution was made”. The verb, diadídōmi, is made from the Greek words for “through” and “give”, and it means to give out among many, to deal out. The KJV’s “was made” reflects a passive verb, and it speaks of an ordered handing out by those charged with it.
The rule was “unto every man according as he had need”. Need, chreía, means need, necessity or lack. Help went where the need was, and “every man” means that each believer in want was reached. Paul argues the same way when he asks for an equality like that of the manna: “He that had gathered much had nothing over; and he that had gathered little had no lack” (2 Corinthians 8:13–15). Luke takes up this care for the needy again when the Seven are appointed (Acts 6:1–7).
Why was the money laid at the apostles’ feet?
Placing a gift at someone’s feet showed respect for him and trust in him, and it put the gift into his keeping. When the owners laid the money at the apostles’ feet, they honoured the apostles as the leaders God had given the church, trusted their honesty and wisdom, and handed over the use of the money for the good of all. Gathering it in one place kept the giving in order, made the apostles answerable for it, and saw to it that the weakest in the church were cared for. Barnabas does the same in verse 37.
Barnabas, the son of consolation
Luke now gives one example by name. Joses was his own name, and the apostles “surnamed” him Barnabas. The verb, epikaléomai, means to entitle or to call by a name, and here the apostles gave him an added name that described him. Barnabas is an Aramaic name, and Luke gives its meaning for his Greek readers: “The son of consolation”. In this way of speaking, the “son of” a quality is someone marked by it, so the name says that consolation was what people knew him by. Consolation, paráklēsis, covers comfort, solace, encouragement, exhortation and earnest appeal, all that one person does in coming alongside another to strengthen him and urge him on in faith.
Why did the apostles call him Barnabas?
The apostles saw in Joses a gift for comforting and encouraging others, and the name they gave him honoured that gift and affirmed his place in the church. Joses remained his name, and Barnabas became the name the church knew him by. Scripture has other new names that speak of who a person is or what God calls him to, as Abram became Abraham and Simon was called Peter.
The name fits the rest of his story. Barnabas stood up for Saul when the believers in Jerusalem were wary of him (Acts 9:27). At Antioch he encouraged the new converts and had a large part in the growth of the church there, and Luke calls him “a good man, and full of the Holy Ghost and of faith” (Acts 11:22–26).
Encouragement is one of the gifts God gives his church. Paul sets “he that exhorteth, on exhortation: he that giveth, let him do it with simplicity” side by side (Romans 12:8), and Barnabas did both. Paul says that prophecy speaks to people for edification, exhortation and comfort (1 Corinthians 14:3), and Hebrews tells us to consider one another, to provoke unto love and good works, and to exhort one another (Hebrews 10:24–25). Christ gives such gifts so that his body is built up in love (Ephesians 4:11–16).
Comfort is God’s own work among his people. Through Isaiah he says, “Comfort ye, comfort ye my people” (Isaiah 40:1). Jesus came alongside his disciples himself, and he promised them “another Comforter”, the Holy Spirit (John 14:16), who would teach them all things and bring his words to their remembrance (John 14:26). The comfort Barnabas gave was Christ’s work by his Spirit, going on through one of his people.
What does it mean that Barnabas was a Levite from Cyprus?
The Levites were the tribe set apart for the service of the tabernacle and the temple and for teaching the law. Here a Levite, whose old life was tied to the temple, serves God in the new covenant through generosity and encouragement. All who belong to Christ, whatever their past, are now “a royal priesthood” (1 Peter 2:9).
The Levites received no tribal inheritance of land in Israel, yet Barnabas owned land. Luke doesn’t say where it lay, and it may have been in Cyprus. “Of the country of Cyprus” uses génos, which comes from a root meaning to be born and means kin, nation or offspring. Barnabas was a Cypriot by birth, one of the Jews living beyond the land of Israel, and his place in the church shows how widely the gospel had already drawn people together into one body.
Barnabas’s gift and the story of Ananias
“Having land” renders hypárchō, a verb for what exists or is at hand, so the land was really his. Barnabas was a man of means giving from what he truly possessed. He “sold it”, with the same verb, pōléō, as the owners in verse 34, and “brought the money”, the sum from the sale, and laid it at the apostles’ feet with the same verb, títhēmi, as verse 35. He did exactly what Luke has just described, and he did it openly.
Right after this, Ananias and Sapphira sell a possession, keep back part of the price and pretend to have given it all (Acts 5:1–11). Barnabas’s open gift and their pretended one stand side by side, and the lesson is honesty in giving. Their sin lay in the lie, because, as Peter said, the land and the money had been theirs to keep (Acts 5:4).
Christ, who became poor for our sakes
Generosity like this has its source in Christ. “For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich” (2 Corinthians 8:9). Being in the form of God, he “made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant” (Philippians 2:5–8), and he submitted to his Father’s will to the cross, praying, “not my will, but thine, be done” (Luke 22:42). On earth, “the Son of man hath not where to lay his head” (Matthew 8:20). He taught his disciples to lay up treasure in heaven (Matthew 6:19–21), and he counts what is done for the least of his brethren as done for him (Matthew 25:34–40). The believers in Jerusalem gave because Christ had given himself for them, and the Spirit he sent was shaping them into his likeness.
What the risen Lord gives his church
These verses show us what God does with a people when his Spirit fills them. He makes them one in heart and soul, he gives their witness to his Son great power, and he rests great grace on every one of them. He loosens their grip on what they own, so that the rich sell lands and houses and the poor among them are cared for. He gives them people like Barnabas, whose very name speaks of comfort. All of it flows from Christ, who was rich and became poor for us, and from his resurrection, which the apostles preached with power.
The same grace is upon his church today. Where believers are of one heart, the need of the brother or sister beside them becomes their own concern, and the God who gave Barnabas his gift of encouragement still gives such gifts to his people. What we hold, we hold from him, and in his hands it goes where it is needed.
Acts 4:32 This verse
“And the multitude of them that believed”
The whole body of believers, by now a great number, spoken of as one company.
“were of one heart and of one soul:”
kardía and psychḗ together: one in thought, will and life, the fruit of the filling with the Holy Ghost in verse 31.
“neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own;”
“Ought” means anything. The weight falls on how they spoke of their goods and held them.
“but they had all things common.”
koinós, shared and open to all, the same way of life Luke described in Acts 2:44–45.
Acts 4:33
“And with great power”
dýnamis, God’s enabling by the Spirit, as Jesus promised in Acts 1:8.
“gave the apostles witness”
martýrion, the testimony of men who had seen the risen Lord with their own eyes.
“of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus:”
The centre of their preaching, and the truth the council most opposed.
“and great grace was upon them all.”
cháris rests on the whole church, and “great” here matches the “great power” of the apostles.
Acts 4:34
“Neither was there any among them that lacked:”
endeḗs, in want. This was the real state of the church in those days.
“for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them,”
ktḗtōr, owners, and pōléō, sold. People of means gave up real wealth.
“and brought the prices of the things that were sold,”
“Prices” means the money received. The sentence runs on into verse 35, where the money is laid at the apostles’ feet.
Acts 4:35
“And laid them down at the apostles’ feet:”
títhēmi and poús, a gesture of respect and trust that handed the money into the apostles’ care.
“and distribution was made”
diadídōmi, given out among many, an ordered task.
“unto every man according as he had need.”
chreía. Need set each share, and “every man” means each believer in want was reached.
Acts 4:36
“And Joses,”
His own name, before the apostles gave him another.
“who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas,”
epikaléomai, an added name from the apostles, who recognised his gift.
“(which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,)”
Luke translates the Aramaic name for his readers. paráklēsis covers comfort, encouragement and exhortation.
“a Levite,”
Of the tribe set apart for temple service, now serving Christ in his church.
“and of the country of Cyprus,”
génos, a Cypriot by birth, from the Jews living beyond the land of Israel.
Acts 4:37
“Having land,”
hypárchō: the land was his, in his own possession.
“sold it,”
pōléō, as in verse 34. He did what Luke has just said the owners did.
“and brought the money,”
The sum from the sale, which he brought himself.
“and laid it at the apostles’ feet.”
The phrase of verse 35 again, which marks Barnabas as one of those givers. His open gift comes just before the story of Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5:1–11.
Last revised