Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And this was done three times: and all were drawn up again into heaven.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 this G5124 was done G1096 G1909 three times G5151: and G2532 all G537 were drawn up G385 again G3825 into G1519 heaven G3772.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
This happened three times, and then everything was pulled back up into heaven.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
This happened three times, and everything was drawn back up into heaven.
Ask
American Standard Version
And this was done thrice: and all were drawn up again into heaven.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
This was done three times, and all were drawn up again into heaven.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And this was done three times, and all were taken vp againe into heauen.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`And this happened thrice, and again was all drawn up to the heaven,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 27,318 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Acts 11:10 concludes Peter's vivid recounting of his transformative vision in Joppa, a divine encounter foundational to the early church's understanding of Gentile inclusion. The verse, stating that the vision "was done three times: and all were drawn up again into heaven," powerfully emphasizes the undeniable clarity, divine origin, and profound significance of God's message, which directly led Peter to preach the Gospel to Cornelius and his household, ushering in a new era of universal salvation.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is embedded within Peter's defense before the apostles and brethren in Jerusalem, who were challenging his association with and eating alongside uncircumcised Gentiles, as recorded in Acts 11:1-3. Peter's meticulous recounting of the entire sequence of events, beginning with his vision, serves as his primary justification. The vision itself, where a great sheet filled with diverse animals descended from heaven and a voice commanded him to "rise, Peter; kill and eat," is initially detailed in Acts 10:9-16. The repetition of the sheet's descent and ascent, culminating in the "three times" mentioned in Acts 11:10, underscores that this was not a fleeting dream but a deliberate, heaven-sent instruction designed to challenge Peter's deeply ingrained Jewish customs and prepare him for God's broader, inclusive mission.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Peter, as a devout Jew, adhered strictly to the Mosaic Law, which included stringent dietary restrictions and prohibitions against associating with Gentiles, who were considered "unclean" or "common" (Acts 10:28). This cultural separation was deeply ingrained, fostering a sense of ethnic and religious superiority among many Jews. The early Christian community, largely Jewish at this point, inherited these customs. God's vision to Peter directly confronted these deeply held beliefs, preparing him to break social and religious barriers. The setting in Joppa, a coastal city, and then Caesarea, a Roman administrative center, highlights the geographical and cultural frontier where this theological breakthrough occurred, moving the Gospel beyond Jerusalem's Jewish confines.
  • Key Themes: Acts 11:10 powerfully reinforces several major themes within Acts and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it highlights Divine Emphasis and Clarity, as the threefold repetition signifies God's absolute insistence and unmistakable communication regarding His message. This ensures Peter fully grasped that God was initiating something profoundly new and radical. Secondly, the verse contributes to the theme of Overcoming Religious Prejudice, as the core of the vision was to challenge Peter's deeply ingrained Jewish dietary laws and cultural separation from Gentiles, teaching him that what God had cleansed, no human should declare common or unclean (Acts 10:15). Ultimately, the verse serves the overarching theme of Gentile Inclusion, preparing Peter and the early church for the full integration of non-Jews into the body of Christ, demonstrating that salvation was for all people, regardless of ethnic or cultural background, a truth echoed throughout the New Testament, particularly in Paul's teachings on unity in Christ (Galatians 3:28).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • And (Greek, dé', G1161): This primary particle serves as a conjunction, often indicating a continuation or, in this context, a transition to the next significant detail in Peter's narrative. It connects the previous description of the vision to the crucial detail of its repetition, signaling a progression in the unfolding revelation.
  • was done (Greek, gínomai', G1096): This verb signifies "to come into being," "to happen," or "to be brought to pass." Its use here emphasizes the active, deliberate, and factual occurrence of the vision. It was not a mere thought or dream, but a divinely orchestrated event that definitively "happened" or "came to pass," reinforcing its reality and authority.
  • heaven (Greek, ouranós', G3772): This term refers to the sky or, by extension, the abode of God. The sheet's ascent "into heaven" signifies the divine origin and ultimate authority of the message. It underscores that the vision was not earthly or human in origin but came directly from God, and its conclusion involved a return to the divine realm, confirming its sacred and authoritative nature.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And this was done three times": This clause highlights the crucial element of repetition. The phrase "this was done" refers to the entire sequence of the sheet descending, the divine command, and Peter's internal struggle. The explicit mention of "three times" is a powerful rhetorical device, emphasizing the divine insistence, clarity, and undeniable confirmation of the message. It leaves no room for Peter to doubt the vision's authenticity or its profound implications for his ministry.
  • "and all were drawn up again into heaven": This second clause describes the conclusion of each repetition of the vision. The phrase "all were drawn up again" refers to the sheet with all its contents being lifted back up. The destination "into heaven" reinforces the divine source and ultimate authority of the revelation. This repeated ascent back to the heavenly realm signifies the completion and confirmation of the divine instruction, underscoring that the message was not to be forgotten or dismissed, but was a direct, authoritative word from God.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in Acts 11:10 is Repetition. The explicit mention that the vision "was done three times" serves as a powerful rhetorical and theological emphasis. In biblical narratives, threefold repetition often signifies completeness, divine confirmation, or profound importance, ensuring that the message is fully grasped and its authority undeniable. This device underscores God's insistence and clarity regarding the radical message of Gentile inclusion, leaving no ambiguity for Peter or the Jerusalem church. Furthermore, there is an element of Symbolism present, where the descending sheet of "unclean" animals symbolizes the Gentiles whom God was now declaring "clean," and the repeated drawing up into heaven symbolizes the divine origin and ultimate validation of this new, inclusive covenant.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Acts 11:10 serves as a pivotal theological anchor, underscoring God's intentionality in dismantling human-made barriers to salvation. The threefold repetition of the vision is not merely a narrative detail but a divine pedagogical method, ensuring Peter's comprehension and acceptance of a radical shift in God's redemptive plan. It signifies God's absolute authority to redefine what is clean and unclean, thereby overturning centuries of Jewish custom and prejudice. This divine act prepares the way for the universal proclamation of the Gospel, demonstrating that God's grace extends beyond ethnic or cultural boundaries, welcoming all who believe into His family. The theological implication is profound: God's love and salvation are truly for "all," and human distinctions based on tradition or ethnicity are rendered obsolete in the light of His cleansing work.

  • Acts 10:15: "What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common."
  • John 21:15-17: Jesus' threefold questioning of Peter, mirroring the threefold denial, emphasizes restoration and a renewed commission.
  • Galatians 3:28: "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Acts 11:10 offers profound lessons for contemporary believers, reminding us that God often communicates His will with undeniable clarity, sometimes through repetition, to ensure our understanding and obedience. Just as Peter was challenged to overcome deeply ingrained cultural and religious biases, we too are called to critically examine our own hearts for any prejudices or preconceived notions that might hinder our ability to love, accept, and share the Gospel with all people whom God has embraced. This verse encourages a posture of openness to God's ongoing work, recognizing that He is always moving, often in ways that challenge our comfort zones or traditional understandings. True spiritual maturity involves being pliable in God's hands, willing to dismantle our own "unclean" categories and embrace His expansive, inclusive love. When God makes His will clear, even if it's uncomfortable or contrary to our established ways, our call is to obey, trusting that such obedience will lead to monumental shifts in reaching others for Christ, just as Peter's obedience led to the Holy Spirit falling on the Gentiles in Acts 10:44-48.

Questions for Reflection

  • What deeply ingrained cultural or personal biases might be hindering my ability to fully embrace and minister to all people, regardless of their background?
  • In what areas of my life or ministry might God be challenging my "clean" and "unclean" categories, asking me to expand my understanding of His will?
  • How readily do I respond to clear divine instruction, especially when it requires me to step outside my comfort zone or challenge my traditions?

FAQ

Why was Peter's vision repeated three times?

Answer: The repetition of Peter's vision "three times" is a significant detail in biblical narrative, often signifying divine confirmation, completeness, or profound emphasis. In this context, it served several crucial purposes. Firstly, it ensured that Peter, who was deeply rooted in Jewish customs and dietary laws, fully grasped the radical nature of God's message: that what God had cleansed, no man should call common or unclean (Acts 10:15). The repetition removed any doubt about the vision's divine origin or its intended meaning. Secondly, it prepared Peter's heart and mind for the monumental task ahead – preaching the Gospel to the Gentile household of Cornelius. The threefold confirmation was necessary to overcome centuries of ingrained prejudice and tradition, making it undeniable that God was initiating a new era of Gentile inclusion into the body of Christ. This echoes other significant threefold repetitions in the Bible, such as Jesus asking Peter three times if he loved Him after Peter's three denials (John 21:15-17), highlighting confirmation and restoration.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The threefold repetition of the vision in Acts 11:10, culminating in the sheet being drawn back into heaven, powerfully foreshadows and confirms the universal scope of salvation achieved through Christ. Before Christ, the ceremonial laws and dietary restrictions served as a "wall of partition" (Ephesians 2:14) between Jew and Gentile. However, Jesus, through His atoning work on the cross, abolished these Old Covenant distinctions, making "one new man" out of the two (Ephesians 2:15). Peter's vision, therefore, is a divine revelation of the practical implications of Christ's finished work: all people, regardless of their ethnic or cultural background, are now deemed "clean" and acceptable to God through faith in Jesus. The repeated ascent of the sheet into heaven signifies that this new reality is not a human invention but a divinely ordained truth, established by the very one who ascended to the Father (Acts 1:9-11). It is a testament to the New Covenant, where the old ceremonial laws are superseded by the spiritual reality of Christ's cleansing blood, making all who believe "holy and without blemish" before God (Colossians 1:22). Thus, Acts 11:10 points directly to Christ as the ultimate cleanser and reconciler, fulfilling God's ancient promise to bless "all families of the earth" through Abraham's seed (Genesis 12:3).

Copy as

Commentary on Acts 11 verses 1–18

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

The preaching of the gospel to Cornelius was a thing which we poor sinners of the Gentiles have reason to reflect upon with a great deal of joy and thankfulness; for it was the bringing of light to us who sat in darkness. Now it being so great a surprize to the believing as well as the unbelieving Jews, it is worth while to enquire how it was received, and what comments were made upon it. And here we find,

I. Intelligence was presently brought of it to the church in Jerusalem, and thereabouts; for Cesarea was not so far from Jerusalem but that they might presently hear of it. Some for good-will, and some for ill-will, would spread the report of it; so that before he himself had returned to Jerusalem the apostles and the brethren there and in Judea heard that the Gentiles also had received the word of God, that is, the gospel of Christ, which is not only a word of God, but the word of God; for it is the summary and centre of all divine revelation. They received Christ; for his name is called the Word of God, Rev 19:13. Not only that the Jews who were dispersed into the Gentile countries, and the Gentiles who were proselyted to the Jewish religion, but that the Gentiles also themselves, with whom it had hitherto been thought unlawful to hold common conversation, were taken into church-communion, that they had received the word of God. That is, 1. That the word of God was preached to them, which was a greater honour put upon them than they expected. Yet I wonder this should seem strange to those who were themselves commissioned to preach the gospel to every creature. But thus often are the prejudices of pride and bigotry held fast against the clearest discoveries of divine truth. 2. That it was entertained and submitted to by them, which was a better work wrought upon them than they expected. It is likely they had got a notion that if the gospel were preached to the Gentiles it would be to no purpose, because the proofs of the gospel were fetched so much out of the Old Testament, which the Gentiles did not receive: they looked upon them as not inclined to religion, nor likely to receive the impressions of it; and therefore were surprized to hear that they had received the word of the Lord. Note, We are too apt to despair of doing good to those who yet, when they are tried, prove very tractable.

II. That offence was taken at it by the believing Jews (Act 11:2, Act 11:3): When Peter had himself come up to Jerusalem, those that were of the circumcision, those Jewish converts that still retained a veneration for circumcision, contended with him. They charged it upon him as a crime that he went in to men uncircumcised, and did eat with them; and thereby they think he has stained, if not forfeited, the honour of his apostleship, and ought to come under the censure of the church: so far were they from looking upon him as infallible, or as the supreme head of the church that all were accountable to, and he to none. See here, 1. How much it is the bane and damage of the church, to monopolize it, and to exclude those from it, and from the benefit of the means of grace, that are not in every thing as we are. There are narrow souls that are for engrossing the riches of the church, as there are that would engross the riches of the world, and would be placed alone in the midst of the earth. These men were of Jonah's mind, who, in a jealousy for his people, was angry that the Ninevites received the word of God, and justified himself in it. 2. Christ's ministers must not think it strange if they be censured and quarrelled with, not only by their professed enemies, but by their professing friends; not only for their follies and infirmities, but for their good actions seasonably and well done; but, if we have proved our own work, we may have rejoicing in ourselves, as Peter had, whatever reflections we may have from our brethren. Those that are zealous and courageous in the service of Christ must expect to be censured by those who, under pretence of being cautious, are cold and indifferent. Those who are of catholic, generous, charitable principles, must expect to be censured by such as are conceited and strait-laced, who say, Stand by thyself, I am holier than thou.

III. Peter gave such a full and fair account of the matter of fact as was sufficient, without any further argument or apology, both to justify him, and to satisfy them (Act 11:4): He rehearsed the matter from the beginning, and laid it before them in order, and then could appeal to themselves whether he had done amiss; for it appeared all along God's own work, and not his.

1.He takes it for granted that if they had rightly understood how the matter was they would not have contended with him, and commended him. And it is a good reason why we should be moderate in our censures, and sparing of them, because if we rightly understood that which we are so forward to run down perhaps we should see cause to run in with it. When we see others do that which looks suspicious, instead of contending with them, we should enquire of them what ground they went upon; and, if we have not an opportunity to do that, should ourselves put the best construction upon it that it will bear, and judge nothing before the time.

2.He is very willing to stand right in their opinion, and takes pains to give them satisfaction. He does not insist upon his being the chief of the apostles, for he was far from the thought of that supremacy which his pretended successors claim. Nor does he think it enough to tell them that he is satisfied himself in the grounds he went upon, and they need not trouble themselves about it; but he is ready to give a reason of the hope that is in him concerning the Gentiles, and why he had receded from his former sentiments, which were the same with theirs. It is a debt we owe both to ourselves and to our brethren to set those actions of ours in a true light which at first looked ill and gave offence, that we may remove stumbling-blocks out of our brethren's way. Let us now see what Peter pleads in his own defence.

(1.)That he was instructed by a vision no longer to keep up the distinctions which were made by the ceremonial law; he relates the vision (Act 11:5, Act 11:6), as we had it before Act 10:9, etc. The sheet which was there said to be let down to the earth he here says came even to him, which circumstance intimates that it was particularly designed for instruction to him. We should thus see all God's discoveries of himself, which he has made to the children of men, coming even to us, applying them by faith to ourselves. Another circumstance here added is that when the sheet came to him he fastened his eyes upon it, and considered it, Act 11:6. If we would be led into the knowledge of divine things, we must fix our minds upon them, and consider them. He tells them what orders he had to eat of all sorts of meat without distinction, asking no questions for conscience' sake, Act 11:7. It was not till after the flood (as it should seem) that man was allowed to eat flesh at all, Gen 9:3. That allowance was afterwards limited by the ceremonial law; but now the restrictions were taken off, and the matter set at large again. It was not the design of Christ to abridge us in the use of our creature-comforts by any other law than that of sobriety and temperance, and preferring the meat that endures to eternal life before that which perishes. He pleads that he was as averse to the thoughts of conversing with Gentiles, or eating of their dainties, as they could be, and therefore refused the liberty given him: Not so, Lord; for nothing common or unclean has at any time entered into my mouth, Act 11:8. But he was told from heaven that the case was now altered, that God had cleansed those persons and things which were before polluted; and therefore that he must no longer call them common, nor look upon them as unfit to be meddled with by the peculiar people (Act 11:9); so that he was not to be blamed for changing his thoughts, when God had changed the thing. In things of this nature we must act according to our present light; yet must not be so wedded to our opinion concerning them as to be prejudiced against further discoveries, when the matter may either be otherwise or appear otherwise; and God may reveal even this unto us, Phi 3:15. And, that they might be sure he was not deceived in it, he tells them it was done three times (Act 11:10), the same command given, to kill and eat, and the same reason, because that which God hath cleansed is not to be called common, repeated a second and third time. And, further to confirm him that it was a divine vision, the things he saw did not vanish away into the air, but were drawn up again into heaven, whence they were let down.

(2.)That he was particularly directed by the Spirit to go along with the messengers that Cornelius sent. And, that it might appear that the vision was designed to satisfy him in this matter, he observes to them the time when the messengers came - immediately after he had that vision; yet, lest this should not be sufficient to clear his way, the Spirit bade him go with the men that were then sent from Cesarea to him, nothing doubting (Act 11:11, Act 11:12); though they were Gentiles he went to, and went with, yet he must make no scruple of going along with them.

(3.)That he took some of his brethren along with him, who were of the circumcision, that they might be satisfied as well as he; and these he had brought up from Joppa, to witness for him with what caution he proceeded, forseeing the offence that would be taken at it. He did not act separately, but with advice; not rashly, but upon due deliberation.

(4.)That Cornelius had a vision too, by which he was directed to send for Peter (Act 11:13): He showed us how he had seen a angel in his house, that bade him send to Joppa for one Simon, whose surname is Peter. See how good it is for those that have communion with God, and keep up a correspondence with heaven, to compare notes, and communicate their experiences to each other; for hereby they may strengthen one another's faith: Peter is the more confirmed in the truth of his vision by Cornelius's, and Cornelius by Peter's. Here is something added in what the angel said to Cornelius; before it was, Send for Peter, and he shall speak to thee, he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do (Act 10:6, Act 10:32); but here it is, "He shall tell thee words whereby thou and thy house shall be saved (Act 11:14), and therefore it is of vast concern to thee, and will be of unspeakable advantage, to send for him." Note, [1.] The words of the gospel are words whereby we may be saved, eternally saved; not merely by hearing them and reading them, but by believing and obeying them. They set the salvation before us, and show us what it is; they open the way of salvation to us, and, if we follow the method prescribed us by them, we shall certainly be saved from wrath and the curse, and be for ever happy. [2.] Those that embrace the gospel of Christ will have salvation brought by it to their families: "Thou and all thy house shall be saved; thou and thy children shall be taken into covenant, and have the means of salvation; thy house shall be as welcome to the benefit of the salvation, upon their believing, as thou thyself, even the meanest servant thou hast. This day is salvation come to this house," Luk 19:9. Hitherto salvation was of the Jews (Joh 4:22), but now salvation is brought to the Gentiles as much as ever it was with the Jews; the promises, privileges, and means of it are conveyed to all nations as amply and fully, to all intents and purposes, as ever it had been appropriated to the Jewish nation.

(5.)That which put the matter past all dispute was the descent of the Holy Ghost upon the Gentile hearers; this completed the evidence that it was the will of God that he should take the Gentiles into communion. [1.] The fact was plain and undeniable (Act 11:15): "As I began to speak" (and perhaps he felt some secret reluctance in his own breast, doubting whether he was in the right to preach to the uncircumcised), "presently the Holy Ghost fell on them in as visible signs as on us at the beginning, in which there could be no fallacy." Thus God attested what was done, and declared his approbation of it; that preaching is certainly right with which the Holy Ghost is given. The apostle supposes this, when he thus argues with the Galatians: Received you the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Gal 3:2. [2.] Peter was hereby put in mind of a saying of his Master's, when he was leaving them (Act 1:5): John baptized with water; but you shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost, Act 11:16. This plainly intimated, First, that the Holy Ghost was the gift of Christ, and the product and performance of his promise, that great promise which he left with them when he went to heaven. It was therefore without doubt from him that this gift came; and the filling of them with the Holy Ghost was his act and deed. As it was promised by his mouth, so it was performed by his hand, and was a token of his favour. Secondly, That the gift of the Holy Ghost was a kind of baptism. Those that received it were baptized with it in a more excellent manner than any of those that even the Baptist himself baptized with water. [3.] Comparing that promise, so worded, with this gift just now conferred, when the question was started, whether these persons should be baptized or no, he concluded that the question was determined by Christ himself (Act 11:17): "Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as he did to us - gave it to us as believing in the Lord Jesus Christ, and to them upon their believing in him - What was I, that I could withstand God? Could I refuse to baptize them with water, whom God had baptized with the Holy Ghost? Could I deny the sign to those on whom he had conferred the thing signified? But, as for me, who was I? What! able to forbid God? Did it become me to control the divine will, or to oppose the counsels of Heaven?" Note, Those who hinder the conversion of souls withstand God; and those take too much upon them who contrive how to exclude from their communion those whom God has taken into communion with himself.

IV. This account which Peter gave of the matter satisfied them, and all was well. Thus, when the two tribes and a half gave an account to Phinehas and the princes of Israel of the true intent and meaning of their building themselves an altar on the banks of Jordan, the controversy was dropped, and it pleased them that it was so, Jos 22:30. Some people, when they have fastened a censure upon a person, will stick to it, though afterwards it appear ever so plainly to be unjust and groundless. It was not so here; for these brethren, though they were of the circumcision, and their bias went the other way, yet, when they heard this, 1. They let fall their censures: they held their peace, and said no more against what Peter had done; they laid their hand upon their mouth, because now they perceived that God did it. Now those who prided themselves in their dignities as Jews began to see that God was staining their pride, by letting in the Gentiles to share, and to share equally, with them. And now that prophecy was fulfilled, Thou shalt no more be haughty because of my holy mountain, Zep 3:11. 2. They turned them into praises. They not only held their peace from quarrelling with Peter, but opened their mouths to glorify God for what he had done by and with Peter's ministry; they were thankful that their mistake was rectified, and that God had shown more mercy to the poor Gentiles than they were inclined to show them, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life! He hath granted them not only the means of repentance, in opening a door of entrance for his ministers among them, but the grace of repentance, in having given them his Holy Spirit, who, wherever he comes to be a Comforter, first convinces, and gives a sight of sin and sorrow for it, and then a sight of Christ and joy in him. Note, (1.) Repentance, if it be true, is unto life. It is to spiritual life; all that truly repent of their sins evidence it by living a new life, a holy, heavenly, and divine life. Those that by repentance die unto sin thenceforward live unto God; and then, and not till then, we begin to live indeed, and it shall be to eternal life. All true penitents shall live, that is, they shall be restored to the favour of God, which is life, which is better than life; they shall be comforted with the assurance of the pardon of their sins, and shall have the earnest of eternal life, and at length the fruition of it. (2.) Repentance is God's gift; it is not only his free grace that accepts it, but his mighty grace that works it in us, that takes away the heart of stone, and gives us a heart of flesh. The sacrifice of God is a broken spirit; it is he that provides himself this lamb. (3.) Wherever God designs to give life he gives repentance; for this is a necessary preparative for the comforts of a sealed pardon and a settled peace in this world, and for the seeing and enjoying of God in the other world. (4.) It is a great comfort to us that God has exalted his Son Jesus, not only to give repentance to Israel, and the remission of sins (Act 5:31), but to the Gentiles also.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–18. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 24
Observe his freedom from all elation and vainglory. For it says, "But Peter rehearsed the matter from the beginning, and expounded it by order unto them, saying, I was in the city of Joppa, praying:" he does not say why, nor on what occasion: "and in a trance I saw a vision, a certain vessel descend, as it had been a great sheet, let down from heaven by four corners; and it came even to me: upon the which when I had fastened mine eyes, I considered, and saw fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air. And I heard a voice saying unto me, Arise, Peter; slay and eat." As much as to say, This of itself was enough to have persuaded me - my having seen the linen sheet: but moreover a Voice was added. "But I said, Not so, Lord: for nothing common or unclean hath at any time entered into my mouth." Do you mark? "I did my part," says he: "I said, that I have never eaten aught common or unclean:" with reference to this that they said, "Thou wentest in, and didst eat with them." But this he does not say to Cornelius: for there was no need to mention it to him. "But the voice answered me again from heaven, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. And this was done three times: and all were drawn up again into heaven."
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Acts 11:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.