TRV
Translation
King James Version
How much more, when wicked men have slain a righteous person in his own house upon his bed? shall I not therefore now require his blood of your hand, and take you away from the earth?
Complete Jewish Bible
How much more, when criminals have killed an innocent man in his own house on his own bed, shouldn't I hold you responsible for his death and rid the earth of you?"
Berean Standard Bible
How much more, when wicked men kill a righteous man in his own house and on his own bed, shall I not now require his blood from your hands and remove you from the earth!”
American Standard Version
How much more, when wicked men have slain a righteous person in his own house upon his bed, shall I not now require his blood of your hand, and take you away from the earth?
World English Bible Messianic
How much more, when wicked men have slain a righteous person in his own house on his bed, shall I not now require his blood of your hand, and take you away from the earth?”
Geneva Bible (1599)
How much more, when wicked men haue slaine a righteous person in his owne house, and vpon his bed? shall I not now therfore require his blood at your hand, and take you from the earth?
Young's Literal Translation
Also--when wicked men have slain the righteous man in his own house, on his bed; and now, do not I require his blood of your hand, and have taken you away from the earth?'
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 8,132 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Samuel 4 verses 9–12
9 ¶ And David answered Rechab and Baanah his brother, the sons of Rimmon the Beerothite, and said unto them, As the LORD liveth, who hath redeemed my soul out of all adversity,
10 When one told me, saying, Behold, Saul is dead, thinking to have brought good tidings, I took hold of him, and slew him in Ziklag, who thought that I would have given him a reward for his tidings:
11 How much more, when wicked men have slain a righteous person in his own house upon his bed? shall I not therefore now require his blood of your hand, and take you away from the earth?
12 And David commanded his young men, and they slew them, and cut off their hands and their feet, and hanged them up over the pool in Hebron. But they took the head of Ishbosheth, and buried it in the sepulchre of Abner in Hebron.
We have here justice done upon the murderers of Ish-bosheth.
I. Sentence passed upon them. There needed no evidence, their own tongues witnessed against them; they were so far from denying the fact that they gloried in it. David therefore shows them the heinousness of the crime, and that blood called for blood from his hand, who was now the chief magistrate, and was by office the avenger of blood. And, perhaps, he was the more vigorous in the prosecution because for reasons of state he had spared Joab: "Shall I not require the blood of the slain at the hand of the slayers, and, since they cannot make restitution, take theirs instead of it?" Observe, 1. How he aggravates the crime, Sa2 4:11. Ish-bosheth was a righteous person, he had done them no wrong, nor designed them any. As to himself, David was satisfied that what opposition he gave him was not from malice, but mistake, from an idea he had of his own title to the crown, and the influence of others upon him, who urged him to put in for it. Note, Charity teaches us to make the best, not only of our friends, but of our enemies, and to think those may be righteous persons who yet, in some instances, do us wrong. I must not presently judge a man a bad man because I think him so to me. David owns Ish-bosheth an honest man, though he had created him a great deal of trouble unjustly. The manner of it much aggravated the crime. To slay him in his own house, which should have been his castle, and upon his bed, when he was in no capacity of making any opposition, this is treacherous and barbarous, and all that is base, and that which the heart of every man who is not perfectly lost to all honour and humanity will rise with indignation at the thought of. Assassinating is confessedly the most odious and villainous way of murdering. Cursed is he that smiteth his neighbour secretly. 2. He quotes a precedent (Sa2 4:10): he had put him to death who had brought him the tidings of the death of Saul, because he thought it would be good tidings to David. Nothing is here said of that Amalekite's helping Saul to kill himself, only of his bringing the tidings of his death, by which it should seem that the story he told was upon enquiry found to be false, and that he lied against his own head. "Now" (says David) "did I treat him as a criminal, and not a favourite" (as he expected), "who brought me Saul's crown, and shall those be held guiltless that bring me Ish-bosheth's head?" 3. He ratifies the sentence with an oath (Sa2 4:9): As the Lord liveth, who hath redeemed my soul out of all adversity. He expresses himself thus resolutely, to prevent the making of any intercession for the criminals by those about him, and thus piously to intimate that his dependence was upon God for the putting of him in possession of the promised throne, and that he would not be beholden to any man to help him to it by any indirect or unlawful practices. God had redeemed him from all adversity hitherto, helped him over many a difficulty and through many a danger, and therefore he would depend upon him to crown and complete his own work. He speaks of his redemption from all adversity as a thing done, though he had many a storm yet before him, because he knew that he who had delivered would deliver. 4. Hereupon he signs a warrant for the execution of these men, Sa2 4:12. This may seem severe, when they intended him a kindness in what they did; but, (1.) He would thus show his detestation of the villany. When he heard that the Lord smote Nabal, he gave thanks (Sa1 25:38, Sa1 25:39), for he is the God to whom vengeance belongeth; but, if wicked men smite Ish-bosheth, they deserve to die for taking God's work out of his hand. (2.) He would thus show his resentment of the great affront they put upon him in expecting that he should patronize and reward it; they could scarcely have done him a greater injury than thus to think him altogether such a one as themselves, one that cared not what blood he waded through to the crown.
II. Execution done. The murderers were put to death according to law, and their hands and feet were hung up; not their whole bodies, the law forbade that; but only their hands and feet, in terrorem - to frighten others, to be monuments of David's justice, and to make that to be taken notice of which would recommend him to the esteem of the people, as a man fit to rule, and that aimed not at his own preferment, nor had any enmity to the house of Saul, but only and sincerely designed the public welfare. But what a confusion was this to the two murderers! What a horrid disappointment! And such those will meet with who think to serve the interests of the Son of David by any immoral practices, by war and persecution, fraud and rapine, who, under colour of religion, murder princes, break solemn contracts, lay countries waste, hate their brethren, and cast them out, and say, Let the Lord be glorified, kill them, and think they do God good service. However men may canonize such methods of serving the church and the catholic cause, Christ will let them know, another day, that Christianity was not intended to destroy humanity; and those who thus think to merit heaven shall not escape the damnation of hell.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 9–12. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Against the Pelagians 1.33
Ish-bosheth, the son of Saul, is killed through a ruse at the hands of Rechab and Baanah, the sons of Rimmon, the Beerothite. And, when they announced the news to David and showed him the head of his enemy, they were killed by David, who said, “Wicked men have slain a just man in his own house upon his bed.” Ish-bosheth was certainly not a just man, and yet he is called a just man because he was innocently killed.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 2 Samuel 4:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
King David, in 2 Samuel 4:11, delivers a stern and uncompromising judgment against Rechab and Baanah, the treacherous assassins of Ish-bosheth, Saul's son. His pronouncement underscores a profound commitment to divine justice and an unwavering abhorrence of opportunistic violence and betrayal, particularly when committed against a vulnerable and "righteous" individual within the sanctity of his own home. David's righteous indignation signals that such heinous acts, far from being rewarded, will incur swift and severe retribution, demonstrating his integrity as God's appointed king.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
David's pronouncement in 2 Samuel 4:11 is rich with literary devices that amplify its impact and convey the gravity of the situation. The primary device is the Rhetorical Question, "How much more... shall I not...?" This is not a question seeking an answer, but a powerful statement designed to emphasize the obviousness and undeniable necessity of David's judgment. It compels the listener (and the reader) to agree with the severity of the impending retribution. There is also a strong element of Contrast or Juxtaposition at play, highlighting the stark opposition between the "wicked men" and the "righteous person," and between the expected sanctuary of "his own house upon his bed" and the violent act committed within it. This contrast underscores the profound violation of moral and social norms. Furthermore, the phrase "How much more" functions as a form of Intensification or A Fortiori Argument, building upon David's previous acts of justice (like the execution of the Amalekite in chapter 1) to convey that this current crime is even more egregious and therefore demands an even more certain and severe response.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The judgment in 2 Samuel 4:11 resonates deeply with core biblical themes of justice, the sanctity of life, and divine sovereignty over human affairs. David's actions are not merely those of a shrewd politician consolidating power, but of a king who understands his role as God's vice-regent, tasked with upholding righteousness and executing justice according to divine standards. The emphasis on "requiring blood" underscores the profound value God places on human life, created in His image, and the severe consequences for its unjust taking. This principle, established early in salvation history, demonstrates God's unwavering commitment to moral order and accountability, ensuring that wickedness, particularly treachery and murder, will ultimately face His righteous judgment. David's integrity in this moment foreshadows the ultimate righteous King who will perfectly administer justice.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
David's response to the murder of Ish-bosheth serves as a timeless paradigm for righteous leadership and personal integrity. In a world often tempted by expediency and the pursuit of power through any means, David's unwavering commitment to justice, even when it might appear politically disadvantageous, stands as a powerful challenge. This passage calls us to reflect on our own willingness to uphold moral principles, even when it means rejecting perceived shortcuts or easy gains. It reminds us that true integrity is demonstrated not just in what we pursue, but in what we refuse to condone. Furthermore, the sanctity of life, so fiercely defended by David here, remains a foundational biblical truth that compels us to advocate for justice and protect the vulnerable in our own contexts, whether in our communities, workplaces, or global society. We are called to be agents of righteousness, abhorring treachery and violence, and trusting that ultimately, God's justice will prevail, ensuring that all actions, both good and evil, will be brought to account.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did David call Ish-bosheth "righteous" when he was his political rival?
Answer: David's use of "righteous" (tsaddîyq, H6662) for Ish-bosheth does not imply an endorsement of his kingship or a statement about his overall moral character. Rather, it specifically refers to Ish-bosheth's innocence concerning the manner of his death. He was not killed in a legitimate battle or as a direct act of war, but was treacherously murdered while vulnerable in his own home. David consistently condemned opportunistic violence and the shedding of innocent blood, even if the victim was a political adversary. This highlights David's commitment to divine justice and his refusal to benefit from illicit acts, reinforcing his character as a king who valued righteousness over political expediency, as seen also in his response to the Amalekite who claimed to have killed Saul in 2 Samuel 1:15.
What is the significance of "require his blood of your hand"?
Answer: This phrase carries profound legal and theological weight. To "require blood" (Hebrew: bâqash dâm, H1245 and H1818) signifies the demand for accountability and retribution for the shedding of innocent life. In ancient Israelite law, murder incurred "bloodguilt" upon the perpetrator and the land, necessitating a just response, often capital punishment, to cleanse the land and satisfy divine justice. David, as the king, acts as God's appointed agent, fulfilling the divine mandate to avenge innocent blood and ensure that such heinous crimes do not go unpunished. It underscores the principle that human life is sacred and its unjust taking demands a severe reckoning before God.
How does this incident contribute to David's character portrayal?
Answer: This incident is crucial in solidifying David's image as a king "after God's own heart." It powerfully reinforces his unwavering commitment to divine justice, his abhorrence of treachery, and his refusal to achieve power through illicit or violent means. By executing Rechab and Baanah, David demonstrates that his kingdom would be established on righteousness, not on Machiavellian schemes or the shedding of innocent blood, even if it seemingly benefited him. This act distinguishes David from other ambitious rulers of his time and underscores his integrity and moral compass as God's chosen leader for Israel, setting a precedent for his reign that would eventually unite all Israel under his just rule, as described in 2 Samuel 5.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
David's righteous indignation and his unwavering commitment to requiring justice for the shedding of innocent blood in 2 Samuel 4:11 powerfully foreshadow the ultimate and perfect justice found in Jesus Christ. David, as an earthly king, acts as God's agent to avenge innocent blood, but his actions point to a greater reality: the divine requirement for justice for all sin, especially the shedding of innocent blood. The ultimate "righteous person" whose blood was shed was Jesus Christ, the spotless Lamb of God, who willingly laid down His life, not as a victim of treachery to be avenged, but as the atoning sacrifice for the sins of humanity. His innocent blood, unlike Ish-bosheth's, was shed not to bring judgment upon His murderers, but to bring forgiveness to the guilty. The divine requirement for blood, established in the Old Testament, where "without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness," as stated in Hebrews 9:22, finds its complete and final satisfaction in Christ's sacrifice on the cross, where God's justice and mercy perfectly converge, demonstrating His righteousness in justifying those who have faith in Jesus, as detailed in Romans 3:25-26. Jesus, the true King, establishes His kingdom not by executing those who oppose Him through treachery, but by bearing the full weight of God's righteous judgment for sin, thereby "taking away" our sin and offering reconciliation, as 1 Peter 2:24 affirms. Ultimately, while David's justice was earthly and limited, Christ's justice is eternal and redemptive, culminating in His return as the perfectly righteous Judge who will finally "require" all blood and bring ultimate justice to the earth, as prophesied in Revelation 19:11.