TRV
Translation
King James Version
Where the people of Israel were slain before the servants of David, and there was there a great slaughter that day of twenty thousand men.
Complete Jewish Bible
The people of Isra'el were defeated there by David's servants; there was a terrible slaughter that day of 20,000 men.
Berean Standard Bible
There the people of Israel were defeated by David’s servants, and the slaughter was great that day—twenty thousand men.
American Standard Version
And the people of Israel were smitten there before the servants of David, and there was a great slaughter there that day of twenty thousand men.
World English Bible Messianic
The people of Israel were struck there before the servants of David, and there was a great slaughter there that day of twenty thousand men.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Where the people of Israel were slaine before the seruants of Dauid: so there was a great slaughter that day, euen of twentie thousande.
Young's Literal Translation
and smitten there are the people of Israel before the servants of David, and the smiting there is great on that day--twenty thousand;
See also
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 8,486 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Samuel 18 verses 1–8
1 ¶ And David numbered the people that were with him, and set captains of thousands and captains of hundreds over them.
2 And David sent forth a third part of the people under the hand of Joab, and a third part under the hand of Abishai the son of Zeruiah, Joab's brother, and a third part under the hand of Ittai the Gittite. And the king said unto the people, I will surely go forth with you myself also.
3 But the people answered, Thou shalt not go forth: for if we flee away, they will not care for us; neither if half of us die, will they care for us: but now thou art worth ten thousand of us: therefore now it is better that thou succour us out of the city.
4 And the king said unto them, What seemeth you best I will do. And the king stood by the gate side, and all the people came out by hundreds and by thousands.
5 And the king commanded Joab and Abishai and Ittai, saying, Deal gently for my sake with the young man, even with Absalom. And all the people heard when the king gave all the captains charge concerning Absalom.
6 So the people went out into the field against Israel: and the battle was in the wood of Ephraim;
7 Where the people of Israel were slain before the servants of David, and there was there a great slaughter that day of twenty thousand men.
8 For the battle was there scattered over the face of all the country: and the wood devoured more people that day than the sword devoured.
Which way David raised an army here, and what reinforcements were sent him, we are not told; many, it is likely, from all the coasts of Israel, at least from the neighbouring tribes, came in to his assistance, so that, by degrees, he was able to make head against Absalom, as Ahithophel foresaw. Now here we have,
I. His army numbered and marshalled, Sa2 18:1, Sa2 18:2. He had, no doubt, committed his cause to God by prayer, for that was his relief in all his afflictions; and then he took an account of his forces. Josephus says they were, in all, but about 4000. These he divided into regiments and companies, to each of which he appointed proper officers, and then disposed them, as is usual, into the right wing, the left wing, and the centre, two of which he committed to his two old experienced generals, Joab and Abishai, and the third to his new friend Ittai. Good order and good conduct may sometimes be as serviceable in an army as great numbers. Wisdom teaches us to make the best of the strength we have, and let it reach to the utmost.
II. Himself over-persuaded not to go in person to the battle. He was Absalom's false friend that persuaded him to go, and served his pride more than his prudence; David's true friends would not let him go, remembering what they had been told of Ahithophel's design to smite the king only. David showed his affection to them by being willing to venture with them (Sa2 18:2), and they showed theirs to him by opposing it. We must never reckon it an affront to be gain-said for our good, and by those that therein consult our interest. 1. They would by no means have him to expose himself, for (say they) thou art worth 10,000 of us. Thus ought princes to be valued by their subjects, who, for their safety, must be willing to expose themselves. 2. They would not so far gratify the enemy, who would rejoice more in his fall than in the defeat of the whole army. 3. He might be more serviceable to them by tarrying in the city, with a reserve of his forces there, whence he might send them recruits. That may be a post of real service which yet is not a post of danger. The king acquiesced in their reasons, and changed his purpose (Sa2 18:4): What seemeth to you best I will do. It is no piece of wisdom to be stiff in our resolutions, but to be willing to hear reason, even from our inferiors, and to be overruled by their advice when it appears to be for our own good. Whether the people's prudence had an eye to it or no, God's providence wisely ordered it, that David should not be in the field of battle; for then his tenderness would certainly have interposed to save the life of Absalom, whom God had determined to destroy.
III. The charge he gave concerning Absalom, Sa2 18:5. When the army was drawn out, rank and file, Josephus says, he encouraged them, and prayed for them, but withal bade them all take heed of doing Absalom any hurt. How does he render good for evil! Absalom would have David only smitten. David would have Absalom only spared. What foils are these to each other! Never was unnatural hatred to a father more strong than in Absalom; nor was ever natural affection to a child more strong than in David. Each did his utmost, and showed what man is capable of doing, how bad it is possible for a child to be to the best of fathers and how good it is possible for a father to be to the worst of children; as if it were designed to be a resemblance of man's wickedness towards God and God's mercy towards man, of which it is hard to say which is more amazing. "Deal gently," says David, "by all means, with the young man, even with Absalom, for my sake; he is a young man, rash and heady, and his age must excuse him; he is mine, whom I love; if you love me, be not severe with him." This charge supposes David's strong expectation of success. Having a good cause and a good God, he doubts not but Absalom would lie at their mercy, and therefore bids them deal gently with him, spare his life and reserve him for his judgment.
Bishop Hall thus descants on this: "What means this ill-placed love? This unjust mercy? Deal gently with a traitor? Of all traitors, with a son? Of all sons, with an Absalom? That graceless darling of so good a father? And all this, for thy sake, whose crown, whose blood, he hunts after? For whose sake must he be pursued, if forborne for thine? Must the cause of the quarrel be the motive of mercy? Even in the holiest parents, nature may be guilty of an injurious tenderness, of a bloody indulgence. But was not this done in type of that immeasurable mercy of the true King and Redeemer of Israel, who prayed for his persecutors, for his murderers, Father, forgive them? Deal gently with them for my sake." When God sends and affliction to correct his children, it is with this charge, "Deal gently with them for my sake;" for he knows our frame.
IV. A complete victory gained over Absalom's forces. The battle was fought in the wood of Ephraim (Sa2 18:6), so called from some memorable action of the Ephraimites there, though it lay in the tribe of Gad. David thought fit to meet the enemy with his forces at some distance, before they came up to Mahanaim, lest he should bring that city into trouble which had so kindly sheltered him. The cause shall be decided by a pitched battle. Josephus represents the fight as very obstinate, but the rebels were at length totally routed and 20,000 of them slain, Sa2 18:7. Now they smarted justly for their treason against their lawful prince, their uneasiness under so good a government, and their base ingratitude to so good a governor; and they found what it was to take up arms for a usurper, who with his kisses and caresses had wheedled them into their own ruin. Now where are the rewards, the preferments, the golden days, they promised themselves from him? Now they see what it is to take counsel against the Lord and his anointed, and to think of breaking his bands asunder. And that they might see that God fought against them, 1. They are conquered by a few, an army, in all probability, much inferior to theirs in number. 2. By that flight with which they hoped to save themselves they destroyed themselves. The wood, which they sought to for shelter, devoured more than the sword, that they might see how, when they thought themselves safe from David's men, and said, Surely the bitterness of death is past, yet the justice of God pursued them and suffered them not to live. What refuge can rebels find from divine vengeance? The pits and bogs, the stumps and thickets, and, as the Chaldee paraphrase understands it, the wild beasts of the wood, were probably the death of multitudes of the dispersed distracted Israelites, besides the 20,000 that were slain with the sword. God herein fought for David, and yet fought against him; for all these that were slain were his own subjects, and the common interest of his kingdom was weakened by the slaughter. The Romans allowed no triumph for a victory in a civil war.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–8. Public domain.
Copy as
Apostolic ConstitutionsAD 380
CONSTITUTIONS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES 6.1.2
Let us therefore, beloved, consider what sort of glory that of the seditious is, and what their condemnation [is]. For if he that rises up against kings is worthy of punishment, even though he is a son or a friend, how much more the one who rises up against the priests! For by how much the priesthood is more noble than the royal power, since its concern is for the soul, so much has the one a greater punishment who ventures to oppose the priesthood than the one who ventures to oppose the royal power, although neither of them goes unpunished. For neither did Absalom nor Abdadan escape without punishment; nor Korah and Dathan. The former rose against David, and strove concerning the kingdom; the latter against Moses, concerning preeminence. And they both spoke evil; Absalom of his father David, as of an unjust judge, saying to every one, “Your words are good, but there is no one that will hear you, and do justice. Who will make me a ruler?” But Abdadan [said], “I have no part in David, nor any inheritance in the son of Jesse.” It is plain that he could not endure to be under David’s government, of whom God spoke, “I have found David the son of Jesse, a man after my heart, who will do all my commands.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 2 Samuel 18:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Second Samuel 18:7 graphically portrays the devastating defeat of Absalom's rebel forces in the decisive battle against King David's loyalists. This verse highlights the immense human cost of the civil war, detailing a catastrophic slaughter of twenty thousand men from Absalom's army, tragically composed of fellow Israelites. It starkly underscores the brutal consequences of rebellion and the profound internal strife that tore at the fabric of the nation.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse employs several potent literary devices to convey the gravity and profound tragedy of the battle. The most prominent is Numerical Emphasis, with the precise figure of "twenty thousand [men]" serving to underscore the immense scale of the slaughter and the devastating human cost of the conflict. This specific number is not merely factual reporting but functions to evoke a visceral sense of shock, sorrow, and the overwhelming nature of the defeat. There is also a powerful Antithesis inherent in the phrase "the people of Israel were slain before the servants of David," highlighting the tragic internal division where fellow countrymen fought and killed one another, rather than a unified nation facing an external enemy. This stark contrast emphasizes the unnatural and deeply sorrowful nature of a civil war. Furthermore, the repetition of the idea of death through "slain" (H5062, nâgaph) and "slaughter" (H4046, maggêphâh) serves as Repetition for Emphasis, hammering home the brutal reality of the battle's outcome and the profound, widespread loss of life.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The devastating slaughter described in 2 Samuel 18:7 serves as a powerful theological statement about the severe consequences of rebellion against God's anointed and the tragic cost of human ambition. While not explicitly stated as divine intervention, the overwhelming defeat of Absalom's forces can be understood within the biblical narrative as God upholding His covenant with David and bringing judgment upon a rebellious son who sought to usurp the throne through violence and deceit. This event underscores the biblical principle that sin, particularly that which undermines divinely established order and legitimate authority, carries severe and often widespread consequences, affecting not only the perpetrator but also those who follow them. It reveals the destructive nature of internal strife and the deep sorrow that accompanies even a necessary victory when it comes at the cost of national unity and countless lives.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The stark reality of 2 Samuel 18:7 compels us to reflect deeply on the profound and often tragic consequences of human choices, especially those driven by pride, ambition, and a disregard for established authority. This verse is a somber reminder that rebellion, whether against civil leaders, spiritual authority, or even within families, inevitably leads to division, suffering, and destruction. It challenges us to consider the immense value of peace, unity, and submission to righteous governance, even when imperfect. For believers, it underscores the importance of humility, seeking reconciliation over conflict, and recognizing that true authority ultimately flows from God. The sorrow that accompanies such a victory, as seen in David's later lament, also teaches us that even in triumph, there can be deep grief over loss, particularly when it involves those we love, regardless of their actions. This passage calls us to examine our own hearts for seeds of rebellion and to cultivate a spirit of humility, obedience, and peacemaking in all our relationships.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Was the "forest of Ephraim" battle truly so deadly, or is "twenty thousand" a symbolic number?
Answer: While biblical numbers can sometimes be used for symbolic emphasis, the detailed description in 2 Samuel 18 strongly suggests a literal and devastating defeat. The text emphasizes the difficult terrain of the "forest of Ephraim" (2 Samuel 18:6), which contributed significantly to the disarray of Absalom's forces, making them easy targets for David's more disciplined army. A casualty count of twenty thousand, while massive, is not unprecedented in ancient warfare for a decisive rout, particularly when an army is trapped and unable to maneuver. The purpose of recording such a high number is to impress upon the reader the catastrophic scale of the defeat for Absalom's rebellion and the immense human cost of this tragic civil war.
What was the significance of "the people of Israel" being slain by "the servants of David"?
Answer: This distinction is crucial because it highlights the profoundly tragic nature of a civil war. "The people of Israel" refers to those Israelites who had joined Absalom's rebellion, while "the servants of David" were loyal Israelites. This was not a battle against a foreign enemy but a fratricidal conflict within the nation, where brother fought against brother. The fact that Israelites were killing fellow Israelites underscores the profound division, betrayal, and sorrow caused by Absalom's usurpation. It emphasizes the deep internal wound inflicted upon the nation, a theme that resonates deeply in David's subsequent lament over his son's death, revealing the personal and national anguish of such a conflict.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The tragic civil war culminating in the "great slaughter" of 2 Samuel 18:7, born out of Absalom's rebellious ambition against his father, King David, serves as a poignant Old Testament shadow pointing to the ultimate rebellion of humanity against God and the profound need for a true and lasting peace. Absalom's pursuit of power led to death and division, a stark contrast to the perfect Son, Jesus Christ, who came not to seize a throne by force but to humble Himself, even to death on a cross (Philippians 2:8). While this verse details a bloody physical conflict, it ultimately speaks to the spiritual civil war raging within humanity due to sin, which separates us from God (Isaiah 59:2). The "great slaughter" underscores the devastating consequences of sin and rebellion, foreshadowing the ultimate judgment that sin deserves. However, Christ, the true Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!, willingly bore the full weight of that judgment, offering Himself as the ultimate sacrifice to end the spiritual war, reconcile humanity to God (Colossians 1:20), and establish a perfect, eternal kingdom of peace and righteousness where no such tragic slaughter will ever occur (Revelation 21:4). The flawed and sorrowful victory of David's reign ultimately gives way to the perfect and triumphant reign of the Prince of Peace, whose kingdom knows no end and no internal strife.