See on the biblical-era map

Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Kings 17 verses 24–41
Never was land lost, we say, for want of an heir. When the children of Israel were dispossessed, and turned out of Canaan, the king of Assyria soon transplanted thither the supernumeraries of his own country, such as it could well spare, who should be servants to him and masters to the Israelites that remained; and here we have an account of these new inhabitants, whose story is related here that we may take our leave of Samaria, as also of the Israelites that were carried captive into Assyria.
I. Concerning the Assyrians that were brought into the land of Israel we are here told, 1. That they possessed Samaria and dwelt in the cities thereof, Kg2 17:24. It is common for lands to change their owners, but sad that the holy land should become a heathen land again. See what work sin makes. 2. That at their first coming God sent lions among them. They were probably insufficient to people the country, which occasioned the beasts of the field to multiply against them (Exo 23:29); yet, besides the natural cause, there was a manifest hand of God in it, who is Lord of hosts, of all the creatures, and can serve his own purposes by which he pleases, small or great, lice or lions. God ordered them this rough welcome to check their pride and insolence, and to let them know that though they had conquered Israel the God of Israel had power enough to deal with them - that he could have prevented their settling here, by ordering lions into the service of Israel, and that he permitted it, not for their righteousness, but the wickedness of his own people - and that they were now under his visitation. They had lived without God in their own land, and were not plagued with lions; but, if they do so in this land, it is at their peril. 3. That they sent a remonstrance of this grievance to the king their master, setting forth, it is likely, the loss their infant colony had sustained by the lions and the continual fear they were in of them, and stating that they looked upon it to be a judgment upon them for not worshipping the God of the land, which they could not, because they knew not how, Kg2 17:26. The God of Israel was the God of the whole world, but they ignorantly call him the God of the land, apprehending themselves therefore within his reach, and concerned to be upon good terms with him. Herein they shamed the Israelites, who were not so ready to hear the voice of God's judgments as they were, and who had not served the God of that land, though he was the God of their fathers and their great benefactor, and though they were well instructed in the manner of his worship. Assyrians begged to be taught that which Israelites hated to be taught. 4. That the king of Assyria took care to have them taught the manner of the God of the land (Kg2 17:27, Kg2 17:28), not out of any affection to that God, but to save his subjects from the lions. On this errand he sent back one of the priests whom he had carried away captive. A prophet would have done them more good, for this was but one of the priests of the calves, and therefore chose to dwell at Bethel for old acquaintance' sake, and, though he might teach them to do better than they did, he was not likely to teach them to do well, unless he had taught his own people better. However, he came and dwelt among them, to teach them how they should fear the Lord. Whether he taught them out of the book of the law, or only by word of mouth, is uncertain. 5. That, being thus taught, they made a mongrel religion of it, worshipped the God of Israel for fear and their own idols for love (Kg2 17:33): They feared the Lord, but they served their own gods. They all agreed to worship the God of the land according to the manner, to serve the Jewish festivals and rites of sacrificing, but every nation made gods of their own besides, not only for their private use in their own families, but to be put in the houses of their high places, Kg2 17:9. The idols of each country are here named, Kg2 17:30, Kg2 17:31. The learned are at a loss for the signification of several of these names, and cannot agree by what representations these gods were worshipped. If we may credit the traditions of the Jewish doctors, they tell us that Succoth-Benoth was worshipped in a hen and chickens, Nergal in a cock, Ashima in a smooth goat, Nibhaz in a dog, Tartak in an ass, Adrammelech in a peacock, Anammelech in a pheasant. Our own tell us, more probably, that Succoth-Benoth (signifying the tents of the daughters) was Venus. Nergal, being worshipped by the Cuthites, or Persians, was the fire, Adrammelech and Anammelech were only distinctions of Moloch. See how vain idolaters were in their imaginations, and wonder at their sottishness. Our very ignorance concerning these idols teaches us the accomplishment of that word which God has spoken, that these false gods should all perish (Jer 10:11); they are all buried in oblivion, while the name of the true God shall continue for ever. 6. This medley superstition is here said to continue unto this day (Kg2 17:41), till the time when this book was written and long after, above 300 years in all, till the time of Alexander the Great, when Manasse, brother to Jaddus the high priest of the Jews, having married the daughter of Sanballat, governor of the Samaritans, went over to them, got leave of Alexander to build a temple in Mount Gerizim, drew over many of the Jews to him, and prevailed with the Samaritans to cast away all their idols and to worship the God of Israel only; yet their worship was mixed with so much superstition that our Saviour told them they knew not what they worshipped, Joh 4:22.
II. Concerning the Israelites that were carried into the land of Assyria. This historian has occasion to speak of them (Kg2 17:22), showing that their successors in the land did as they had done (after the manner of the nations whom they carried away), they worshipped both the God of Israel and those other gods; but what did the captives do in the land of their affliction? Were they reformed, and brought to repentance, by their troubles? No, they did after the former manner, Kg2 17:34. When the two tribes were afterwards carried into Babylon, they were cured by it of their idolatry, and therefore, after seventy years, they were brought back with joy; but the ten tribes were hardened in the furnace, and therefore were justly lost in it and left to perish. This obstinacy of theirs is here aggravated by the consideration, 1. Of the honour God had put upon them, as the seed of Jacob, whom he named Israel, and from him they were so named, but were a reproach to that worthy name by which they were called. 2. Of the covenant he made with them, and the charge he gave them upon that covenant, which is here very fully recited, that they should fear and serve the Lord Jehovah only, who had brought them up out of Egypt (Kg2 17:36), that, having received his statutes and ordinances in writing, they should observe to do them for evermore (Kg2 17:37), and never forget that covenant which God had made with them, the promises and conditions of that covenant, especially that great article of it which is here thrice repeated, because it had been so often inculcated and so much insisted on, that they should not fear other gods. He had told them that, if they kept close to him, he would deliver them out of the hand of all their enemies (Kg2 17:39); yet when they were in the hand of their enemies, and stood in need of deliverance, they were so stupid, and had so little sense of their own interest, that they did after the former manner (Kg2 17:40), they served both the true God and false gods, as if they knew no difference. Ephraim is joined to idols, let him alone. So they did, and so did the nations that succeeded them. Well might the apostle ask, What then, Are we better than they? No, in no wise, for both Jews and Gentiles are all under sin, Rom 3:9.
Continue studying 2 Kings 17:35 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Second Kings 17:35 serves as a poignant theological anchor within the narrative of Israel's downfall, explicitly recalling the foundational covenant God established with His people and reiterating His non-negotiable command against all forms of idolatry. This verse, though appearing as a retrospective reminder, underscores the profound spiritual adultery that led to the Northern Kingdom's catastrophic exile, attributing their national demise directly to their persistent and egregious violations of this very covenant, particularly their worship of other gods. It powerfully articulates the LORD's unwavering expectation of exclusive devotion from His chosen people, highlighting the justice and inevitability of His judgment when that sacred trust was broken.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Second Kings 17:35 employs several powerful literary devices to convey its profound theological message with emphasis and clarity. The most prominent is Enumeration and Anaphora, where the series of four prohibitions ("fear... nor bow... nor serve... nor sacrifice") creates a comprehensive and emphatic declaration against all forms of idolatry. The repeated "nor" (anaphora) at the beginning of each successive prohibition builds a rhythmic insistence, highlighting the absolute, multifaceted, and non-negotiable nature of God's command. The verse also functions as a powerful Flashback or Summary Statement within the larger narrative of Israel's apostasy, recalling a foundational truth that Israel consistently and tragically violated. This creates a stark Contrast between God's clear, unchanging will and Israel's persistent rebellion, thereby providing a theological justification for the severe judgment that has befallen them. The precise, almost legalistic phrasing underscores the Covenantal Language used, reinforcing the idea of a broken, binding contract.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The command articulated in 2 Kings 17:35 is far more than a mere ancient prohibition; it is a timeless theological principle deeply rooted in the very character of God. It reveals Yahweh as the sovereign, unique, and incomparably holy God who demands and deserves exclusive worship from His people. Idolatry, in any form, is therefore not merely a minor transgression but an act of spiritual adultery, a profound betrayal of the covenant relationship, and a direct assault on God's glory and unique supremacy. This verse underscores that true faith involves undivided loyalty, where God alone is the ultimate object of our fear, reverence, service, and sacrifice. The devastating consequences of failing to uphold this fundamental truth, as tragically demonstrated by the Northern Kingdom, serve as a perpetual warning against allowing anything or anyone to usurp God's rightful, supreme place in our lives and affections.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
While contemporary society may not typically engage in the overt worship of physical idols of wood or stone, the timeless and profound message of 2 Kings 17:35 remains profoundly relevant and convicting. The human heart retains its ancient propensity for idolatry, subtly shifting its ultimate allegiance, fear, service, and sacrifice from the one true God to other objects of devotion. These "other gods" can manifest as the relentless pursuit of wealth, career success, personal comfort, social status, technological distraction, self-worship, or even ideological commitments that subtly or overtly supersede divine truth and God's commands. This verse challenges us to conduct an honest and searching inventory of our lives, examining what truly commands our ultimate trust, consumes our precious time, dictates our most important decisions, and receives our deepest affections and energies. True spiritual health, flourishing, and freedom are found in cultivating an exclusive and undivided loyalty to the LORD, recognizing that anything that competes for His rightful place in our hearts becomes a destructive idol, leading to spiritual barrenness and ultimately, judgment.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why does 2 Kings 17:35 mention a covenant made "with whom" when the chapter primarily describes Israel's disobedience?
Answer: This verse functions as a powerful rhetorical and theological device within the broader narrative of 2 Kings 17. While the chapter meticulously details Israel's persistent disobedience and the resulting judgment, verse 35 serves as a direct and pointed reminder of the original, foundational covenant established by the LORD with their ancestors, most notably at Mount Sinai. By recalling God's explicit and unwavering commands against idolatry, the text highlights the stark contrast between God's clear stipulations and Israel's chronic, deliberate rebellion. It underscores that Israel's catastrophic downfall was not arbitrary or capricious but a just and inevitable consequence of their willful violation of a sacred covenant they knowingly entered into. The phrase "with whom" refers to the nation of Israel as a whole, emphasizing that the entire community was bound by these divine charges, making their widespread idolatry and syncretism all the more culpable and deserving of divine judgment.
How does the prohibition against "fearing other gods" differ from "bowing," "serving," or "sacrificing"?
Answer: The four prohibitions in 2 Kings 17:35 create a comprehensive and escalating picture of idolatry, moving from the internal disposition of the heart to the most profound external acts of worship. "Fearing other gods" (Hebrew yārêʾ) primarily refers to the internal reverence, awe, and ultimate trust one places in a deity. It speaks to the heart and mind, where allegiance is first formed and where ultimate loyalty resides. The subsequent prohibitions—"bowing yourselves to them" (the physical act of prostration or homage), "serving them" (active, ongoing devotion, labor, and obedience in daily life), and "sacrificing to them" (the highest, most costly, and intimate act of religious devotion)—are external, observable expressions and outworkings of that internal fear or reverence. Together, they cover every dimension of worship, indicating that God demands exclusive devotion not only in outward ritual and service but also, and fundamentally, in the deepest recesses of the human heart and the practical direction of one's entire life.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The unwavering command for exclusive worship articulated in 2 Kings 17:35 finds its ultimate fulfillment and deepest meaning in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While the Old Covenant, with its clear demands for singular devotion, was tragically and persistently broken by Israel's idolatry, Jesus perfectly fulfilled the Law and the Prophets, demonstrating an unblemished, undivided allegiance to the Father. He is the one true God manifest in the flesh, the very object of worship who perfectly embodied what it means to "fear," "bow to," "serve," and "sacrifice" to God alone (Matthew 4:10). Through His atoning sacrifice on the cross, Christ inaugurated the New Covenant, a covenant not merely written on stone tablets but powerfully inscribed on the hearts of believers by the Holy Spirit (Hebrews 8:10). In this new and living reality, the power of sin and idolatry is decisively broken, enabling true worship "in spirit and truth" (John 4:23-24). Believers are now called to present their bodies as living sacrifices, holy and acceptable to God, which is their spiritual and reasonable worship (Romans 12:1-2), actively putting to death any earthly thing that might function as an idol or rival for God's supreme place in their lives (Colossians 3:5). Thus, the prohibition against "other gods" in the Old Testament is not merely a legalistic restraint but an profound invitation to find ultimate satisfaction, freedom, and eternal life in Christ, the one Lord who alone is supremely worthy of all our fear, reverence, service, and devotion.