Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And when the king entered into the house of the LORD, the guard came and fetched them, and brought them again into the guard chamber.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And when H1767 the king H4428 entered H935 into the house H1004 of the LORD H3068, the guard H7323 came H935 and fetched H5375 them, and brought them again H7725 into the guard H7323 chamber H8372.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Whenever the king went to the house of ADONAI, the guard would come and get the shields; later they would return them to the guardroom.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And whenever the king entered the house of the LORD, the guards would go with him, bearing the shields, and later they would return them to the guardroom.
Ask
American Standard Version
And it was so, that, as oft as the king entered into the house of Jehovah, the guard came and bare them, and brought them back into the guard-chamber.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
It was so, that as often as the king entered into the LORD’s house, the guard came and bore them, and brought them back into the guard room.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when the King entred into the house of the Lord, the garde came and bare them and brought them againe vnto the garde chamber.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and it cometh to pass, from the time of the going in of the king to the house of Jehovah, the runners have come in and lifted them up, and brought them back unto the chamber of the runners.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 11,449 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

This verse meticulously details a significant alteration in the ceremonial protocol within the Jerusalem Temple during King Rehoboam's reign, specifically concerning the royal shields. It serves as a tangible illustration of the profound consequences of Judah's unfaithfulness and the subsequent Egyptian invasion, which necessitated the replacement of King Solomon's original, glorious gold shields with inferior bronze ones, thereby establishing a new, less splendid, and more laborious procedure for their use.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 2 Chronicles 12:11 concludes a narrative segment that vividly portrays the immediate and tangible consequences of King Rehoboam and Judah's apostasy. The chapter commences with a clear statement of Rehoboam's spiritual decline, as he "forsook the law of the LORD" after consolidating his kingdom and power (2 Chronicles 12:1). This spiritual infidelity swiftly invites divine judgment in the form of an invasion by Shishak, king of Egypt (2 Chronicles 12:2). Shishak's campaign culminates in the plunder of Jerusalem and the Temple, stripping away its immense treasures, most notably the magnificent gold shields that King Solomon had crafted for ceremonial display (2 Chronicles 12:9). In response to this devastating loss, Rehoboam commissions the creation of bronze shields as replacements (2 Chronicles 12:10). Verse 11 then describes the altered ritual for these new, inferior shields: no longer permanently displayed, they were stored in a "guard chamber" and only brought out by the royal guard when the king entered the house of the LORD, underscoring a profound diminution in status and an increased reliance on human effort.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events chronicled in 2 Chronicles 12 unfold in the early 10th century BCE, a period immediately following the tumultuous division of the united monarchy into the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah. Rehoboam, the son and successor of Solomon, ruled Judah from Jerusalem, inheriting a kingdom diminished in territory but still possessing the spiritual and symbolic heartland of the Temple. Shishak, identified with Sheshonk I, a powerful pharaoh of the 22nd Dynasty of Egypt, led a well-documented military campaign into Canaan, which aligns precisely with the biblical account, providing crucial external historical corroboration for the period. The Temple in Jerusalem was far more than a mere religious edifice; it was the spiritual, political, and economic nexus of the kingdom, housing immense wealth and symbolizing God's tangible presence and favor among His people. Gold, as the most precious metal, universally signified divine glory, purity, and unparalleled wealth, frequently employed in sacred objects to reflect God's majesty. Bronze, while a valuable and utilitarian metal, represented a stark downgrade in both material and symbolic value when compared to gold. The presence of a "guard" or "runners" (Hebrew: rûwts), often an elite corps of royal bodyguards or attendants, was a common feature of ancient Near Eastern monarchies, emphasizing royal dignity, security, and authority. Here, their role is notably altered to manage a resource that has been significantly diminished.

  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully encapsulates several overarching themes prevalent throughout 2 Chronicles and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it starkly illustrates the Consequences of Disobedience, demonstrating how spiritual unfaithfulness directly precipitates tangible loss and a profound diminution of glory. Rehoboam's initial apostasy, detailed in 2 Chronicles 12:1, directly leads to the plundering of the Temple and the loss of its most precious symbols. Secondly, the narrative underscores the Loss of Splendor and Divine Favor. The replacement of Solomon's magnificent gold shields with inferior bronze ones, coupled with the altered, more laborious ritual for their use, symbolizes the kingdom's reduced status and the withdrawal of the overt divine blessing and opulence that had characterized Solomon's reign. This theme resonates deeply with the covenant warnings found in Deuteronomy 28, where blessings are contingent upon obedience and curses upon disobedience. Thirdly, there is a subtle yet significant theme of God's Mercy Amidst Judgment. Despite the severe judgment, Rehoboam and the princes humble themselves (2 Chronicles 12:6), and God, in His compassion, does not allow for complete destruction, preserving a remnant of their former glory, albeit in a diminished form. The very act of the guard fetching and returning the shields, though laborious, subtly contrasts with the divine protection and effortless glory that would have been evident had the people remained fully faithful.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • House (Hebrew, bayith', H1004): This term (H1004) refers to "a house" in its broadest sense, but here specifically denotes the "house of the LORD," which is the Temple in Jerusalem. Its usage emphasizes the sacred space where the king's entry and the shield ritual took place. The Temple was the central place of worship and the symbol of God's presence, making the diminished glory within its walls particularly poignant.
  • Guard (Hebrew, rûwts', H7323): This term (H7323) refers to "runners" or "bodyguards," often an elite corps of royal attendants. Their involvement highlights that the handling of these shields was now a matter of royal security and protocol, rather than a permanent, inherent sacred display. Their act of "fetching" and "bringing" the shields underscores the labor and temporary nature of their exhibition, a stark contrast to the permanent, inherent glory of the original gold shields.
  • Fetched (Hebrew, nâsâʼ', H5375): This verb (H5375) means "to lift," "to bear," or "to carry," and in this context, "to fetch" or "to take up." It emphasizes a deliberate, active retrieval. The shields were no longer readily available or on constant display; they had to be specifically "fetched" from storage, highlighting their diminished status and the effort required to present them for the king's entry.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And when the king entered into the house of the LORD": This clause establishes the specific occasion for the shield ritual. The "house of the LORD" refers to the Temple in Jerusalem, the spiritual and ceremonial heart of the kingdom. The king's entry would have been a formal procession, demanding the display of royal regalia, including these ceremonial shields. This highlights that the shields were now part of a temporary, king-centric display, rather than a permanent fixture symbolizing the Temple's inherent, divinely bestowed glory.
  • "the guard came and fetched them": This describes the new, laborious protocol for the bronze shields. The "guard" (royal bodyguards or runners) were dispatched to retrieve the shields from their storage location. This action emphasizes the human effort and logistical requirement involved in presenting what was once a symbol of effortless, divinely bestowed glory and wealth. It underscores the diminished state of the kingdom's resources and the loss of the original, permanently displayed gold shields.
  • "and brought them again into the guard chamber": This final phrase confirms the temporary nature of the shields' display. After the royal procession or ceremony concluded, the shields were not returned to a place of honor or permanent exhibition within the main Temple courts but were put back into a secure storage area. This reinforces the theme of diminished glory and the practical, rather than inherently symbolic, function of these bronze replacements, serving as a constant, visible reminder of Judah's unfaithfulness and the subsequent divine judgment.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several significant literary devices to convey its profound theological message. Symbolism is paramount, as the replacement of King Solomon's magnificent gold shields with King Rehoboam's bronze ones serves as a powerful visual representation of Judah's spiritual decline and diminished glory. Gold symbolizes divine favor, purity, and the peak of national prosperity and divine blessing under Solomon, while bronze represents an inferior, less glorious state, a tangible sign of judgment and loss. There is also a clear Contrast established between the opulence and divine blessing of Solomon's reign, where gold shields were likely on permanent display, and the reduced circumstances of Rehoboam's era, where inferior bronze shields had to be laboriously "fetched" and "brought again" into storage. This contrast highlights the direct, visible consequences of disobedience. Furthermore, the shields themselves function as a form of Metonymy, where the part (the shields) stands for the whole (the kingdom's spiritual and material state). Their diminished status and altered handling reflect the diminished spiritual vitality and political standing of Judah under Rehoboam.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The narrative of 2 Chronicles 12:11, particularly the poignant replacement of gold with bronze and the altered ceremonial practice, serves as a profound theological statement on the direct consequences of spiritual decline and covenant unfaithfulness. It illustrates that turning away from God's law and His covenant inevitably leads to a loss of divine blessing, protection, and glory. The visible downgrade from gold to bronze is a tangible manifestation of an internal spiritual reality—a kingdom that has lost its luster and divine favor due to unfaithfulness. While God's mercy is evident in Rehoboam's humbling and the prevention of complete destruction (2 Chronicles 12:6), the lasting impact of sin is clearly depicted in this diminished state. It underscores the biblical principle that God's covenant blessings are conditional upon obedience, and disobedience brings about judgment and a tangible reduction in divine favor and provision, requiring increased human effort where divine grace once flowed freely.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

This verse offers a sobering and deeply practical reflection on the tangible consequences of our spiritual choices and the subtle erosion that can occur when we drift from God's perfect will. Just as the magnificent gold shields were replaced by inferior bronze, symbolizing a kingdom's diminished glory due to unfaithfulness, so too can our own spiritual blessings, vitality, and the manifest "glory" of God's presence in our lives be lessened when we become complacent or turn away from Him. It challenges us to honestly examine areas where we might have allowed "bronze" to replace "gold" in our spiritual walk—perhaps substituting genuine, heartfelt devotion with mere routine, or divine dependence with self-reliance and human striving. The necessity for the guard to laboriously "fetch" and "return" the shields also speaks to the increased human effort required to maintain a semblance of glory or spiritual effectiveness when God's unmerited favor and anointing are diminished. Yet, even in this depiction of judgment, there is a subtle thread of grace; the shields, though inferior, were still used, and the Temple remained, signifying God's enduring covenant faithfulness even when His people falter. This calls us to humble ourselves, as Rehoboam and the princes did, so that God's restorative hand might prevent complete ruin and perhaps, in His mercy, restore what was lost, albeit through a process of repentance and renewed obedience.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life have I allowed "bronze" to replace "gold," indicating a departure from God's best or a decline in spiritual vitality?
  • What "spiritual treasures" or manifestations of God's glory might I have lost or diminished due to unfaithfulness, complacency, or a lack of vigilance?
  • How does the increased human effort described in this verse (the guard fetching and returning the shields) relate to my own spiritual striving when I'm not fully relying on God's grace and provision?
  • What specific steps can I take to humble myself before the Lord, confess any areas of spiritual compromise, and seek His restoration, even in the midst of consequences?

FAQ

Why were the gold shields replaced with bronze ones?

Answer: The original gold shields, which were magnificent creations of King Solomon, were plundered and carried away by Shishak, the king of Egypt, during his invasion of Jerusalem (2 Chronicles 12:9). This act of plunder was a direct and tangible consequence of King Rehoboam and Judah's unfaithfulness to the LORD, as explicitly stated earlier in the chapter. As a necessary replacement for these lost treasures, Rehoboam had bronze (or brass) shields made (2 Chronicles 12:10), which were significantly inferior in both material value and symbolic significance, thereby reflecting the kingdom's diminished glory, wealth, and divine favor.

What is the significance of the shields being stored in a "guard chamber" and needing to be "fetched"?

Answer: The "guard chamber" signifies a secure storage area, rather than a place of permanent display or honor within the main Temple courts. The fact that the shields had to be "fetched" by the royal guard and then "brought again" into storage after use signifies a stark contrast to the likely permanent and prominent display of Solomon's original gold shields. This new, laborious protocol highlights their diminished status: they were no longer symbols of inherent, constant glory and divine blessing, but rather functional props brought out only for specific, temporary royal occasions. It underscores the profound loss of the kingdom's former splendor and the increased human effort required to maintain even a semblance of royal dignity and ceremonial practice after the severe divine judgment.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The narrative of 2 Chronicles 12:11, with its poignant depiction of diminished glory and the replacement of gold with bronze, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate and perfect fulfillment found in Jesus Christ. The temporary, inferior bronze shields, requiring human effort to be brought out for a fleeting display, stand in stark contrast to the eternal, unblemished glory of God made manifest in Christ. While Judah's unfaithfulness led to a loss of splendor and a reliance on human guards and laborious rituals, Christ is the true "Glory of the Lord" who permanently dwells among us, not needing to be fetched from a chamber or brought out for an occasion. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, whose perfect sacrifice fully restores what sin had diminished, offering a glory far surpassing any earthly gold or human effort. Through His perfect obedience, Christ reversed the consequences of human rebellion, providing access to an enduring, spiritual splendor that is not subject to plunder, decay, or the ebb and flow of human faithfulness. He is our ultimate shield and protector, not a temporary prop, but the very power of God and the wisdom of God. In Him, we find not a diminished glory, but the fullness of the Godhead bodily, permanently displayed and eternally accessible, a testament to God's unfailing grace that far exceeds any earthly restoration. He is the true Temple, in whom all the symbols of God's presence, protection, and glory find their ultimate and perfect reality.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Chronicles 12 verses 1–12

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Israel was very much disgraced and weakened by being divided into two kingdoms; yet the kingdom of Judah, having both the temple and the royal city, both the house of David and the house of Aaron, might have done very well if they had continued in the way of their duty; but here we have all out of order there.

I. Rehoboam and his people left God: He forsook the law of the Lord, and so in effect forsook God, and all Israel with him, Ch2 12:1. He had his happy triennium, when he walked in the way of David and Solomon (Ch2 11:17), but it expired, and he grew remiss in the worship of God; in what instances we are not told, but he fell off, and Judah with him, here called Israel, because they walked in the evil ways into which Jeroboam had drawn the kingdom of Israel. Thus he did when he had established the kingdom and strengthened himself. As long as he thought his throne tottered he kept to his duty, that he might make God his friend; but, when he found it stood pretty firmly, he thought he had no more occasion for religion; he was safe enough without it. Thus the prosperity of fools destroys them. Jeshurun waxed fat and kicked. When men prosper, and are in no apprehension of troubles, they are ready to say to God, Depart from us.

II. God quickly brought troubles upon them, to awaken them, and recover them to repentance, before their hearts were hardened. It was but in the fourth year of Rehoboam that they began to corrupt themselves, and in the fifth year the king of Egypt came up against them with a vast army, took the fenced cities of Judah, and came against Jerusalem, Ch2 12:2, Ch2 12:3, Ch2 12:4. This great calamity coming upon them so soon after they began to desert the worship of God, by a hand they had little reason to suspect (having had a great deal of friendly correspondence with Egypt in the last reign), and coming with so much violence that all the fenced cities of Judah, which Rehoboam had lately fortified and garrisoned and on which he relied much for the safety of his kingdom, fell immediately into the hands of the enemy, without making any resistance, plainly showed that it was from the Lord, because they had transgressed against him.

III. Lest they should not readily or not rightly understand the meaning of this providence, God by the word explains the rod, Ch2 12:5. When the princes of Judah had all met at Jerusalem, probably in a great council of war, to concert measures for their own safety in this critical juncture, he sent a prophet to them, the same that had brought them an injunction from God not to fight against the ten tribes (Ch2 11:2), Shemaiah by name; he told them plainly that the reason why Shishak prevailed against them was not because they had been impolitic in the management of their affairs (which perhaps the princes in this congress were at this time scrutinizing), but because they had forsaken God. God never leaves any till they first leave him.

IV. The rebukes both of the word and of the rod being thus joined, the king and princes humbled themselves before God for their iniquity, penitently acknowledged the sin, and patiently accepted the punishment of it, saying, The Lord is righteous, Ch2 12:6. "We have none to blame but ourselves; let God be clear when he judgeth." Thus it becomes us, when we are under the rebukes of Providence, to justify God and judge ourselves. Even kings and princes must either bend or break before God, either be humbled or be ruined.

V. Upon the profession they made of repentance God showed them some favour, saved them from ruin, and yet left them under some remaining fears of the judgment, to prevent their revolt again.

1.God, in mercy, prevented the destruction they were now upon the brink of. Such a vast and now victorious army as Shishak had, having made themselves masters of all the fenced cities, what could be expected but that the whole country, and even Jerusalem itself, would in a little time be theirs? But when God saith, Here shall the proud waves be stayed, the most threatening force strangely dwindles and becomes impotent. Here again the destroying angel, when he comes to Jerusalem, is forbidden to destroy it: "My wrath shall not be poured out upon Jerusalem; not at this time, not by this hand, not utterly to destroy it," Ch2 12:7, Ch2 12:12. Note, Those that acknowledge God righteous in afflicting them shall find him gracious. Those that humble themselves before him shall find favour with him. So ready is the God of mercy to take the first occasion to show mercy. If we have humbled hearts under humbling providences, the affliction has done its work, and it shall either be removed or the property of it altered.

2.He granted them some deliverance, not complete, but in part; he gave them some advantages against the enemy, so that they recruited a little; he gave them deliverance for a little while, so some. They reformed but partially, and for a little while, soon relapsing again; and, as their reformation was, so was their deliverance. Yet it is said (Ch2 12:12), in Judah things went well, and began to look with a better face. (1.) In respect of piety. There were good things in Judah (so it is in the margin), good ministers, good people, good families, who were made better by the calamities of their country. Note, In times of great corruption and degeneracy it is some comfort if there be a remnant among whom good things ar found; this is a ground of hope in Israel. (2.) In respect of prosperity. In Judah things went ill when all the fenced cities were taken (Ch2 12:4), but when they repented the posture of their affairs altered, and things went well. Note, If things do not go so well as we could wish, yet we have reason to take notice of it with thankfulness if they go better than was to have been expected, better than formerly, and better than we deserved. We should own God's goodness if he do but grant us some deliverance.

3.Yet he left them to smart sorely by the hand of Shishak, both in their liberty and in their wealth.

(1.)In their liberty (Ch2 12:8): They shall be his servants (that is, they shall lie much at his mercy and be put under contribution by him, and some of them perhaps be taken prisoners and held in captivity by him), that they may know my service, and the service of the kingdoms of the countries. They complained, it may be, of the strictness of their religion, and forsook the law of the Lord (Ch2 12:1) because they thought it a yoke to hard, too heavy, upon them. "Well," saith God, "let them better themselves if they can; let the neighbouring princes rule them awhile, since they are not willing that I should rule them, and let them try how they like that. They might have served God with joyfulness and gladness of heart, and would not; let them serve their enemies then in hunger and thirst (Deu 28:47, Deu 28:48), till they think of returning to their first Master, for then it was better with them," Hos 2:7. This, some think, is the meaning of Eze 20:24, Eze 20:25. Because they despised my statutes, I gave them statutes that were not good. Note, [1.] The more God's service is compared with other services the more reasonable and easy it will appear. [2.] Whatever difficulties or hardships we may imagine there are in the way of obedience, it is better a thousand times to go through them than to expose ourselves to the punishment of disobedience. Are the laws of temperance thought hard? The effects of intemperance will be much harder. The service of virtue is perfect liberty; the service of lust is perfect slavery.

(2.)In their wealth. The king of Egypt plundered both the temple and the exchequer, the treasuries of both which Solomon left very full; but he took them away; yea, he took all, all he could lay his hands on, Ch2 12:9. This was what he came for. David and Solomon, who walked in the way of God, filled the treasuries, one by war and the other by merchandise; but Rehoboam, who forsook the law of God, emptied them. The taking away of the golden shields, and the substituting of brazen ones in their place (Ch2 12:9-11), we had an account of before, Kg1 14:25-28.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–12. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Chronicles 12:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.