TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 2 Chronicles 12:1–12. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Israel was very much disgraced and weakened by being divided into two kingdoms; yet the kingdom of Judah, having both the temple and the royal city, both the house of David and the house of Aaron, might have done very well if they had continued in the way of their duty; but here we have all out of order there.
I.Rehoboam and his people left God:
He forsook the law of the Lord, and so in effect forsook God, and all Israel with him, Ch2 12:1. He had his happy triennium, when he walked in the way of David and Solomon (Ch2 11:17), but it expired, and he grew remiss in the worship of God; in what instances we are not told, but he fell off, and Judah with him, here called Israel, because they walked in the evil ways into which Jeroboam had drawn the kingdom of Israel. Thus he did when he had established the kingdom and strengthened himself. As long as he thought his throne tottered he kept to his duty, that he might make God his friend; but, when he found it stood pretty firmly, he thought he had no more occasion for religion; he was safe enough without it. Thus the prosperity of fools destroys them. Jeshurun waxed fat and kicked. When men prosper, and are in no apprehension of troubles, they are ready to say to God, Depart from us.
II.God quickly brought troubles upon them, to awaken them, and recover them to repentance, before their hearts were hardened.
It was but in the fourth year of Rehoboam that they began to corrupt themselves, and in the fifth year the king of Egypt came up against them with a vast army, took the fenced cities of Judah, and came against Jerusalem, Ch2 12:2, Ch2 12:3, Ch2 12:4. This great calamity coming upon them so soon after they began to desert the worship of God, by a hand they had little reason to suspect (having had a great deal of friendly correspondence with Egypt in the last reign), and coming with so much violence that all the fenced cities of Judah, which Rehoboam had lately fortified and garrisoned and on which he relied much for the safety of his kingdom, fell immediately into the hands of the enemy, without making any resistance, plainly showed that it was from the Lord, because they had transgressed against him.
III.Lest they should not readily or not rightly understand the meaning of this providence, God by the word explains the rod, Ch2 12:5.
When the princes of Judah had all met at Jerusalem, probably in a great council of war, to concert measures for their own safety in this critical juncture, he sent a prophet to them, the same that had brought them an injunction from God not to fight against the ten tribes (Ch2 11:2), Shemaiah by name; he told them plainly that the reason why Shishak prevailed against them was not because they had been impolitic in the management of their affairs (which perhaps the princes in this congress were at this time scrutinizing), but because they had forsaken God. God never leaves any till they first leave him.
IV.The rebukes both of the word and of the rod being thus joined, the king and princes humbled themselves before God for their iniquity, penitently acknowledged the sin, and patiently accepted the punishment of it, saying, The Lord is righteous, Ch2 12:6. "We have none to blame but ourselves; let God be clear when he judgeth." Thus it becomes us, when we are under the rebukes of Providence, to justify God and judge ourselves. Even kings and princes must either bend or break before God, either be humbled or be ruined.
V.Upon the profession they made of repentance God showed them some favour, saved them from ruin, and yet left them under some remaining fears of the judgment, to prevent their revolt again.
1.God, in mercy, prevented the destruction they were now upon the brink of. Such a vast and now victorious army as Shishak had, having made themselves masters of all the fenced cities, what could be expected but that the whole country, and even Jerusalem itself, would in a little time be theirs? But when God saith, Here shall the proud waves be stayed, the most threatening force strangely dwindles and becomes impotent. Here again the destroying angel, when he comes to Jerusalem, is forbidden to destroy it: "My wrath shall not be poured out upon Jerusalem; not at this time, not by this hand, not utterly to destroy it," Ch2 12:7, Ch2 12:12. Note, Those that acknowledge God righteous in afflicting them shall find him gracious. Those that humble themselves before him shall find favour with him. So ready is the God of mercy to take the first occasion to show mercy. If we have humbled hearts under humbling providences, the affliction has done its work, and it shall either be removed or the property of it altered.
2.He granted them some deliverance, not complete, but in part; he gave them some advantages against the enemy, so that they recruited a little; he gave them deliverance for a little while, so some. They reformed but partially, and for a little while, soon relapsing again; and, as their reformation was, so was their deliverance. Yet it is said (Ch2 12:12), in Judah things went well, and began to look with a better face.
(1.)In respect of piety. There were good things in Judah (so it is in the margin), good ministers, good people, good families, who were made better by the calamities of their country. Note, In times of great corruption and degeneracy it is some comfort if there be a remnant among whom good things ar found; this is a ground of hope in Israel.
(2.)In respect of prosperity. In Judah things went ill when all the fenced cities were taken (Ch2 12:4), but when they repented the posture of their affairs altered, and things went well. Note, If things do not go so well as we could wish, yet we have reason to take notice of it with thankfulness if they go better than was to have been expected, better than formerly, and better than we deserved. We should own God's goodness if he do but grant us some deliverance.
3.Yet he left them to smart sorely by the hand of Shishak, both in their liberty and in their wealth.
(1.)In their liberty (Ch2 12:8): They shall be his servants (that is, they shall lie much at his mercy and be put under contribution by him, and some of them perhaps be taken prisoners and held in captivity by him), that they may know my service, and the service of the kingdoms of the countries. They complained, it may be, of the strictness of their religion, and forsook the law of the Lord (Ch2 12:1) because they thought it a yoke to hard, too heavy, upon them. "Well," saith God, "let them better themselves if they can; let the neighbouring princes rule them awhile, since they are not willing that I should rule them, and let them try how they like that. They might have served God with joyfulness and gladness of heart, and would not; let them serve their enemies then in hunger and thirst (Deu 28:47, Deu 28:48), till they think of returning to their first Master, for then it was better with them," Hos 2:7. This, some think, is the meaning of Eze 20:24, Eze 20:25. Because they despised my statutes, I gave them statutes that were not good. Note,
[1.]The more God's service is compared with other services the more reasonable and easy it will appear.
[2.]Whatever difficulties or hardships we may imagine there are in the way of obedience, it is better a thousand times to go through them than to expose ourselves to the punishment of disobedience. Are the laws of temperance thought hard? The effects of intemperance will be much harder. The service of virtue is perfect liberty; the service of lust is perfect slavery.
(2.)In their wealth. The king of Egypt plundered both the temple and the exchequer, the treasuries of both which Solomon left very full; but he took them away; yea, he took all, all he could lay his hands on, Ch2 12:9. This was what he came for. David and Solomon, who walked in the way of God, filled the treasuries, one by war and the other by merchandise; but Rehoboam, who forsook the law of God, emptied them. The taking away of the golden shields, and the substituting of brazen ones in their place (Ch2 12:9-11), we had an account of before, Kg1 14:25-28.
Continue studying 2 Chronicles 12:2 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
In the fifth year of King Rehoboam's reign over Judah, the kingdom faced a severe crisis as Shishak, the powerful king of Egypt, launched a devastating invasion against Jerusalem. This military incursion was not merely a geopolitical event but is explicitly presented by the Chronicler as a direct divine consequence, a judgment from the LORD upon Rehoboam and the people of Judah "because they had transgressed against the LORD." This verse vividly illustrates the immediate and tangible repercussions of covenant unfaithfulness, serving as a stark reminder of God's justice and His active involvement in the affairs of His people.
Context
Literary Context
This verse immediately follows the Chronicler's crucial theological statement in 2 Chronicles 12:1 that "when Rehoboam had established the kingdom, and had strengthened himself, he forsook the law of the LORD, and all Israel with him." Thus, 2 Chronicles 12:2 serves as the direct and swift consequence of this widespread apostasy. The narrative then progresses to describe the scale of Shishak's invasion (2 Chronicles 12:3-4), the prophet Shemaiah's divine message of judgment (2 Chronicles 12:5), and the subsequent humbling of Rehoboam and the princes, which leads to God's partial mercy and the averting of complete destruction (2 Chronicles 12:6-7). This immediate cause-and-effect relationship between sin and judgment, followed by repentance and mercy, is a hallmark of the Chronicler's theological agenda, emphasizing the direct consequences of covenant fidelity or infidelity, particularly for the Davidic line and the people of Judah.
Historical & Cultural Context
The invasion by Shishak, king of Egypt, is a significant historical event, widely corroborated by extra-biblical sources. Shishak is identified with Pharaoh Shoshenq I, the founder of the 22nd Dynasty of Egypt, who reigned from approximately 945-924 BC. His campaign into Canaan, dated to around 925 BC (the fifth year of Rehoboam's reign), is recorded on the Bubastite Portal at the Temple of Amun in Karnak, Egypt, which lists many conquered cities in Judah and Israel. This invasion occurred relatively soon after the death of Solomon and the division of the united kingdom, indicating Egypt's resurgence as a regional power and its readiness to exploit the political instability in Canaan. Culturally, the invasion would have been perceived not only as a military threat but also as a profound humiliation for Judah, particularly Jerusalem, the city where God's temple resided. The covenant framework, deeply embedded in Israelite culture, taught that such national calamities were often direct results of breaking faith with Yahweh, as outlined in the blessings and curses of Deuteronomy 28.
Key Themes
2 Chronicles 12:2 powerfully illustrates several key themes prevalent in the book of Chronicles. Foremost is the Consequences of Disobedience: The verse explicitly states that Shishak's invasion occurred "because they had transgressed against the LORD," establishing a direct causal link between national sin and divine judgment. This reinforces the Chronicler's emphasis on immediate retribution for unfaithfulness, a principle seen throughout the historical narratives (e.g., Deuteronomy 28:15-68). Secondly, the theme of Divine Justice and Discipline is prominent. The invasion is not random but a purposeful act of God's justice, a form of discipline intended to bring His people back to repentance and renewed covenant loyalty, rather than utter destruction (2 Chronicles 12:6-7). Finally, the verse underscores the Sovereignty of God over all nations and kings. Even a powerful foreign monarch like Shishak is ultimately an instrument in God's hands, used to accomplish His divine purposes concerning His covenant people, demonstrating that God rules over the affairs of men and nations (Psalm 103:19).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This Hebrew verb (H4603) carries significant theological weight. It denotes an act of unfaithfulness, treachery, or a breach of trust, particularly in the context of a covenant relationship. It is more than just a casual sin; it implies a profound act of disloyalty, a betrayal of allegiance to God, who had faithfully established His covenant with Israel and brought them into the land. The use of mâʻal here highlights the seriousness of Judah's turning away from the LORD, indicating a deliberate and deep-seated rejection of His law and covenant.
This refers to Pharaoh Shoshenq I (H7895), the founder of the 22nd Dynasty of Egypt. His appearance in the biblical narrative, alongside archaeological and historical records confirming his campaign, lends strong credibility to the historical accuracy of the biblical account. His name signifies a powerful, historical adversary, whose invasion was a tangible and devastating consequence for Judah, yet ultimately an instrument of divine purpose.
The precise dating of the event to "the fifth year" (H2549) of King Rehoboam is crucial. It emphasizes the swiftness of divine judgment following Rehoboam's apostasy, which is stated to have occurred after he "had established the kingdom, and had strengthened himself" (2 Chronicles 12:1). This rapid succession of events underscores the Chronicler's theological point: God's response to covenant infidelity is both certain and often immediate, demonstrating His active governance over His people's history.
Verse Breakdown
"And it came to pass, [that] in the fifth year of king Rehoboam"
This opening clause establishes the precise historical timing of the event. The "fifth year" indicates a relatively short period after Rehoboam's initial establishment of his kingdom and his subsequent turning away from the Lord, highlighting the swiftness of divine response to unfaithfulness and setting the stage for the unfolding judgment.
"Shishak king of Egypt came up against Jerusalem"
This identifies the agent of the judgment (Shishak, a powerful foreign king) and the primary target (Jerusalem, the capital city and center of worship). The phrase "came up against" signifies a military campaign, an act of aggression and invasion, underscoring the severity of the impending crisis for Judah and the direct threat to the heart of their national and religious identity.
"because they had transgressed against the LORD"
This is the pivotal theological statement of the verse, providing the explicit divine reason for Shishak's invasion. It unequivocally attributes the national calamity not to geopolitical forces alone, but to the spiritual condition of Rehoboam and the people of Judah. Their "transgression" (Hebrew ma'al, unfaithfulness, breach of covenant) is presented as the direct cause of God's allowing this foreign power to invade, thereby demonstrating His justice and sovereignty over historical events.
Literary Devices
The Chronicler employs several literary devices in 2 Chronicles 12:2 to convey his profound theological message. Most prominent is Causality, where the verse explicitly links the invasion of Shishak directly to Judah's "transgression against the LORD." This clear cause-and-effect relationship underscores the Chronicler's didactic purpose: to demonstrate that covenant faithfulness leads to blessing, while unfaithfulness leads to judgment. This also functions as a form of Theodicy, explaining why God's people suffer; it is not arbitrary, but a just consequence of their actions. The narrative also utilizes Historical Narrative to present events as factual occurrences, yet imbues them with profound theological meaning, showcasing God's active involvement in human history. The specific mention of "the fifth year" and "Shishak king of Egypt" adds a layer of Verisimilitude, grounding the theological interpretation in concrete, verifiable historical details and lending authority to the Chronicler's divinely inspired message.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The invasion of Shishak, explicitly attributed to Judah's "transgression against the LORD," serves as a powerful theological statement about the nature of God's covenant with His people and the consequences of breaking it. It underscores God's holiness, His unwavering commitment to justice, and His active involvement in the affairs of nations. This event is not an isolated incident but a recurring pattern throughout Israel's history, demonstrating that God holds His people accountable for their fidelity to His commands. While God is merciful and long-suffering, He is also just, and His discipline is often a means to bring His people back to Himself, preventing their complete destruction and preserving a remnant. This narrative reminds us that spiritual realities have tangible consequences in the physical world, and that national well-being is intrinsically linked to corporate obedience to God.
Reflection and Application
The account of Shishak's invasion in 2 Chronicles 12:2 offers a timeless principle for individuals and communities today: there are real and often tangible consequences for turning away from God and His revealed will. Just as Judah's "transgression" led to external hardship, so too can our personal or corporate neglect of spiritual faithfulness open the door to difficulties, both internal (e.g., spiritual barrenness, relational strife) and external (e.g., financial struggles, societal decay). This verse calls us to a deep self-examination, prompting us to consider areas where we might be unfaithful to God's covenant, whether in our personal walk, family life, or corporate church body. It serves as a stark reminder that God is not indifferent to our choices; He is sovereign, just, and actively involved in disciplining those whom He loves. However, the subsequent verses in 2 Chronicles 12 also offer profound hope, showing that God's discipline is often a call to repentance and humility, leading to His mercy and restoration when people acknowledge their sin. Our spiritual condition truly has real-world implications, and God remains faithful even when we are not, working to draw us back to Himself for our ultimate good and His glory.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Who was Shishak, and what was the broader significance of his invasion beyond the biblical narrative?
Shishak is identified with Pharaoh Shoshenq I, the founder of the 22nd Dynasty of Egypt, who reigned from approximately 945-924 BC. His invasion, described in 2 Chronicles 12:2-4, was a major geopolitical event in the ancient Near East. Beyond the biblical account, which attributes the invasion to Judah's transgression against the LORD, Shoshenq I's campaign is well-documented in Egyptian history, notably on the Bubastite Portal at the Temple of Amun in Karnak. This portal lists numerous cities in Judah and Israel that he conquered or plundered, including Megiddo, Gezer, and others. The invasion signified Egypt's reassertion of power in Canaan after a period of relative weakness, exploiting the political fragmentation of the Israelite kingdom following Solomon's death. For Judah, it was a devastating military defeat and a profound humiliation, resulting in the loss of treasures from the Temple and the royal palace (2 Chronicles 12:9). Historically, it provides a crucial synchronism between biblical events and external ancient Near Eastern records, affirming the historicity of the biblical narrative. Theologically, it serves as a powerful demonstration of God's sovereignty over nations and His use of foreign powers as instruments of His divine judgment and discipline upon His unfaithful people.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The account of Judah's transgression and the subsequent judgment through Shishak's invasion in 2 Chronicles 12:2 finds its ultimate fulfillment and resolution in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The Old Testament consistently demonstrates that "transgression" (Hebrew ma'al), a breach of covenant faithfulness, inevitably leads to consequences, both temporal and eternal. Humanity's deepest transgression is against a holy God, resulting in separation and the just condemnation of sin (Romans 3:23). However, Jesus Christ, the perfect Son of God, came not to bring judgment upon those who believe, but to bear the judgment for all who would trust in Him. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, becoming the ultimate sacrifice for our transgressions (Isaiah 53:5). While the Old Covenant often saw immediate, tangible consequences for national sin, the New Covenant, established through Christ's blood, offers complete forgiveness and reconciliation for individual believers, removing the ultimate sting of judgment (Hebrews 8:12). For those in Christ, God's discipline is no longer punitive judgment leading to destruction, but rather a loving, sanctifying process designed to conform us to His image (Hebrews 12:5-11). Thus, while 2 Chronicles 12:2 highlights the severity of sin and its consequences, it ultimately points us to the profound grace found in Christ, who bore the full weight of our transgression so that we might receive eternal life and an unshakeable kingdom (Hebrews 12:28).