Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And they said, Thou hast not defrauded us, nor oppressed us, neither hast thou taken ought of any man's hand.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And they said H559, Thou hast not defrauded H6231 us, nor oppressed H7533 us, neither hast thou taken H3947 ought H3972 of any man's H376 hand H3027.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
They answered, "You haven't defrauded or oppressed us, and you have accepted nothing from anyone."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“You have not wronged us or oppressed us,” they replied, “nor have you taken anything from the hand of man.”
Ask
American Standard Version
And they said, Thou hast not defrauded us, nor oppressed us, neither hast thou taken aught of any man’s hand.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
They said, “You have not defrauded us, nor oppressed us, neither have you taken anything of any man’s hand.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then they sayde, Thou hast done vs no wrong, nor hast hurt vs, neither hast thou taken ought of any mans hand.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And they say, `Thou hast not oppressed us, nor hast thou crushed us, nor hast thou taken from the hand of any one anything.'
Ask
In the KJVVerse 7,465 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Samuel 12:4 captures the resounding affirmation of the Israelite people regarding Samuel's blameless and righteous leadership as he transitions authority to Saul. In response to Samuel's challenge to testify against his conduct as judge, the people unequivocally declare that he had neither defrauded nor oppressed them, nor had he taken any illicit gain. This public vindication underscores Samuel's unwavering integrity and selfless service, setting a profound and enduring standard for ethical governance as Israel transitioned from the era of judges to a monarchy.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within Samuel's poignant farewell address to the nation of Israel, delivered at Gilgal immediately following the anointing of Saul as their first king. Having served as prophet, priest, and judge for decades, Samuel is now relinquishing his direct leadership role, marking a pivotal moment in Israelite history. In 1 Samuel 12:1-3, Samuel challenges the people to bear witness against him, inviting them to expose any wrongdoing during his tenure. Their unequivocal response in verse 4 serves as a powerful testament to his integrity, establishing a stark contrast between his righteous governance and the potential for corruption in the new monarchical system. This address functions as a covenant renewal ceremony, reminding Israel of God's faithfulness and their responsibility to obey Him, regardless of their chosen form of government.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period of the judges, which Samuel concludes, was characterized by a cyclical pattern of apostasy, oppression, and deliverance, often through charismatic leaders raised up by God. However, the sons of Samuel, unlike their father, had "turned aside after lucre, and took bribes, and perverted judgment" (1 Samuel 8:3). This corruption, alongside the people's desire to be "like all the nations" (1 Samuel 8:5), prompted Israel's demand for a king. In the ancient Near East, leaders often exploited their positions for personal gain through excessive taxation, forced labor, or judicial corruption. Samuel's public challenge and the people's response highlight a unique standard of accountability rooted in the Mosaic Law, which strictly prohibited such abuses of power, as seen in Deuteronomy 16:19. His blameless record thus stands as a powerful anomaly and a model for the nascent monarchy.
  • Key Themes: The central theme illuminated by this verse is Integrity in Leadership. Samuel's unblemished record underscores the biblical ideal of righteous governance, where authority is exercised for the welfare of the people and the glory of God, not for personal enrichment. This directly relates to the theme of Accountability, as Samuel willingly submits himself to public scrutiny, setting a precedent for leaders to be transparent and answerable to those they serve and, ultimately, to God. Furthermore, the specific denials of "defrauded," "oppressed," and "taken ought of any man's hand" highlight the theme of Justice and Fairness. Samuel's leadership embodied the principles of the covenant, ensuring equitable treatment and upholding the rights of the vulnerable, in stark contrast to the corrupt practices of his sons and the typical abuses of power prevalent in the ancient world. This integrity was crucial for Samuel's role as a mediator between God and Israel, as a leader's moral standing impacted their ability to lead the people in covenant faithfulness.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Defrauded (Hebrew, ‘âshaq', H6231): This verb (H6231) signifies "to press upon," "to oppress," "to defraud," or "to violate." It often implies wrongful gain achieved by taking advantage of a weaker party, particularly through economic means or by withholding what is due. In a judicial or administrative context, it refers to the abuse of power to unjustly seize property or wealth from others. The people's denial confirms Samuel never used his authority to unjustly enrich himself or deprive them of their possessions.
  • Oppressed (Hebrew, râtsats', H7533): This word (H7533) means "to crack in pieces," "to break," "to bruise," or "to crush." Figuratively, it conveys the idea of severe oppression, discouragement, or violent subjugation. While ‘âshaq might imply subtle exploitation, râtsats suggests a more direct, aggressive act of injustice or tyrannical force. The people's statement affirms that Samuel did not resort to coercive or violent means to acquire anything from them, maintaining peace and order without tyranny.
  • Taken (Hebrew, lâqaḥ', H3947): This primitive root (H3947) means "to take" in its widest variety of applications, including to accept, receive, or seize. In the context of "taken ought (H3972, mᵉʼûwmâh, meaning "something" or "anything") of any man's (H376, ʼîysh, meaning "man") hand (H3027, yâd, meaning "hand")," it refers to the act of receiving illicit gain or a bribe. The denial here is crucial, as bribery was a widespread form of corruption in ancient legal systems. Samuel's refusal to accept such payments ensured that his judgments were impartial and his administration untainted by personal gain.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And they said, Thou hast not defrauded us": This initial declaration by the people directly addresses Samuel's challenge in 1 Samuel 12:3. It is a powerful affirmation that Samuel, despite holding immense power as judge, prophet, and spiritual leader, never abused his position to unjustly take from the people. He did not engage in economic exploitation or unfair taxation for personal benefit, upholding the principles of equity and fair dealing.
  • "nor oppressed us": Following the denial of defrauding, this clause further clarifies the nature of Samuel's blamelessness. It asserts that he did not use his authority to violently seize property or rights, nor did he subject the people to tyrannical rule or forced labor. This speaks to his just and benevolent exercise of power, ensuring the people's security and freedom from arbitrary confiscation, demonstrating a leadership free from heavy-handedness.
  • "neither hast thou taken ought of any man's hand": This final and comprehensive denial specifically targets the common practice of bribery or illicit personal gain. It confirms that Samuel's judgments were untainted by personal gain, and his decisions were based solely on justice and the Mosaic Law, not on illicit payments or gifts. This statement underscores his complete impartiality and integrity in all his dealings, reinforcing his reputation as a truly righteous leader who served without self-interest.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several significant literary devices. Foremost is Public Vindication, where the people, as direct witnesses, unequivocally clear Samuel of any wrongdoing, lending immense weight and credibility to his blameless character. This is achieved through Negative Affirmation, a rhetorical strategy where integrity is highlighted by explicitly denying potential accusations ("not defrauded," "nor oppressed," "neither hast thou taken"). This emphasizes the absence of corruption, making his purity of conduct more striking and undeniable. The verse also functions as the climax to Samuel's Rhetorical Challenge (implied from 1 Samuel 12:3), where he invites public testimony. The people's unanimous response serves as a powerful and decisive answer, validating his lifelong service. Finally, there is an implicit Contrast between Samuel's righteous leadership and the corrupt practices of his own sons (1 Samuel 8:3), as well as the potential for future kings to abuse their power, thereby setting a high, almost unattainable, standard for the new monarchy.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Samuel's blameless record, as attested by the people in 1 Samuel 12:4, serves as a powerful theological statement about the nature of righteous leadership under God. It reflects the divine standard for those in authority, emphasizing that true leadership is characterized by service, integrity, and justice, rather than self-enrichment or oppression. This aligns with God's own character as a righteous judge who does not pervert justice and is impartial. Samuel's conduct demonstrates what it means to lead a covenant people in a manner consistent with the Mosaic Law, which repeatedly warns against bribery and exploitation. His example stands as a prophetic indictment against all forms of corrupt leadership, whether ancient or modern, and underscores the spiritual principle that true authority is derived from faithfulness to God and selfless service to His people, reflecting His own perfect righteousness.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Samuel's public vindication in 1 Samuel 12:4 offers a timeless and challenging model for integrity in all spheres of life, particularly for those entrusted with leadership. It calls us to examine our own conduct, whether in positions of formal authority within our families, workplaces, communities, or churches, or simply in our daily interactions. The standard is not merely the absence of overt wrongdoing, but a proactive commitment to justice, fairness, and selfless service. We are challenged to live with such transparency and blamelessness that, if asked, those we serve could genuinely affirm our integrity, free from any accusation of exploitation, oppression, or corruption. This pursuit of blamelessness is not for self-glory, but as a testimony to the God who calls us to reflect His character in all our dealings. It reminds us that our legacy is ultimately defined not by power or possessions, but by the integrity of our character and the purity of our service, aiming to honor God in every interaction.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life, whether personal or professional, am I called to exercise leadership, and how does Samuel's example challenge my approach?
  • If I were to invite those I lead or serve to testify about my conduct, what would they honestly say regarding my integrity, fairness, and freedom from self-interest?
  • How does the principle of "not defrauding, oppressing, or taking ought of any man's hand" translate into my daily interactions and financial dealings?
  • What steps can I take to cultivate a greater degree of transparency and accountability in my own life and in the groups I am part of?

FAQ

What was the significance of Samuel asking the people to testify about his conduct?

Answer: Samuel's challenge in 1 Samuel 12:3 was highly significant for several reasons. Firstly, it served as a powerful act of accountability. As Israel transitioned from a divinely appointed judge to a human king, Samuel, a leader of immense spiritual and political authority, willingly subjected himself to public scrutiny. This demonstrated a profound commitment to transparency and set a high ethical standard for the new monarchy. Secondly, it was an act of vindication. By inviting the people to speak, Samuel ensured that his blameless record was publicly affirmed, silencing any potential future accusations and solidifying his legacy as a righteous servant of God. Thirdly, it served as a covenant reminder. By demonstrating his own faithfulness to the Mosaic Law's prohibitions against judicial corruption, Samuel implicitly reminded the people of their own covenant obligations and the standards God expected from their leaders and themselves. This public affirmation of his integrity lent moral weight to his subsequent exhortations regarding their future obedience to God under the new king, highlighting the importance of righteous governance in God's eyes.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Samuel's integrity stands as an exemplary model of righteous leadership in the Old Testament, it ultimately points to the perfect, unblemished character of Jesus Christ. Samuel, a faithful servant, was a type of the true and ultimate Leader, the Good Shepherd, who truly defrauded no one, oppressed none, and took no bribe. Unlike earthly leaders, whose integrity, however commendable, remains imperfect, Jesus lived a life of absolute purity and selflessness. He did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many. He was the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, offering Himself as the ultimate sacrifice, not for personal gain, but for the redemption of humanity. His entire ministry was characterized by justice, compassion, and truth, without any hint of corruption or exploitation. The people's affirmation of Samuel's blamelessness foreshadows the divine declaration of Christ's sinless perfection, for He committed no sin, nor was any deceit found in His mouth. Thus, Samuel's exemplary conduct serves as a shadow, pointing forward to the flawless and eternally righteous leadership of our Lord Jesus Christ, the King of kings, whose reign is marked by perfect justice and unwavering love.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Samuel 12 verses 1–5

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here, I. Samuel gives them a short account of the late revolution, and of the present posture of their government, by way of preface to what he had further to say to them, Sa1 12:1, Sa1 12:2. 1. For his own part, he had spent his days in their service; he began betimes to be useful among them, and had continued long so: "I have walked before you, as a guide to direct you, as a shepherd that leads his flock (Psa 80:1), from my childhood unto this day." As soon as he was illuminated with the light of prophecy, in his early days, he began to be a burning and shining light to Israel; "and now my best days are done: I am old and gray-headed;" therefore they were the more unkind to cast him off, yet therefore he was the more willing to resign, finding the weight of government heavy upon his stooping shoulders. He was old, and therefore the more able to advise them, and the more observant they should have been of what he said, for days shall speak and the multitude of years shall teach wisdom; and there is a particular reverence due to the aged, especially aged magistrates and aged ministers. "I am old, and therefore not likely to live long, perhaps may never have an opportunity of speaking to you again, and therefore take notice of what I say." 2. As for his sons, "Behold" (says he), "they are with you, you may, if you please, call them to an account for any thing they have done amiss. They are present with you, and have not, upon this revolution, fled from their country. They are upon the level with you, subjects to the new king as well as you; if you can prove them guilty of any wrong, you may prosecute them now by a due course of law, punish them, and oblige them to make restitution." 3. As for their new king, Samuel had gratified them in setting him over them (Sa1 12:1): "I have hearkened to your voice in all that you said to me, being desirous to please you, if possible, and make you easy, though to the discarding of myself and family; and now will you hearken to me, and take my advice?" The change was now perfected: "Behold, the king walketh before you" (Sa1 12:2); he appears in public, ready to serve you in public business. Now that you have made yourselves like the nations in your civil government, and have cast off the divine administration in that, take heed lest you make yourselves like the nations in religion and cast off the worship of God.

II. He solemnly appeals to them concerning his own integrity in the administration of the government (Sa1 12:3): Witness against me, whose ox have I taken? Observe,

1.His design in this appeal. By this he intended, (1.) To convince them of the injury they had done him in setting him aside, when they had nothing amiss to charge him with (his government had no fault but that it was too cheap, too easy, too gentle), and also of the injury they had done themselves in turning off one that did not so much as take an ox or an ass from them, to put themselves under the power of one that would take from them their fields and vineyards, nay, and their very sons and daughters (Sa1 8:11), so unlike would the manner of the king be from Samuel's manner. (2.) To preserve his own reputation. Those that heard of Samuel's being rejected as he was would be ready to suspect that certainly he had done some evil thing, or he would never have been so ill treated; so that it was necessary for him to make this challenge, that it might appear upon record that it was not for any iniquity in his hands that he was laid aside, but to gratify the humour of a giddy people, who owned they could not have a better man to rule them, only they desired a bigger man. There is a just debt which every man owes to his own good name, especially men in public stations, which is to guard it against unjust aspersions and suspicions, that we may finish our course with honour as well as joy. (3.) As he designed hereby to leave a good name behind him, so he designed to leave his successor a good example before him; let him write after his copy, and he will write fair. (4.) He designed, in the close of his discourse, to reprove the people, and therefore he begins with a vindication of himself; for he that will, with confidence, tell another of his sin, must see to it that he himself be clear.

2.In the appeal itself observe,

(1.)What it is that Samuel here acquits himself from. [1.] He had never, under any pretence whatsoever, taken that which was not his own, ox or ass, had never distrained their cattle for tribute, fines, or forfeitures, nor used their service without paying for it. [2.] He had never defrauded those with whom he dealt, nor oppressed those that were under his power. [3.] He had never taken bribes to pervert justice, nor was ever biassed by favour for affection to give judgment in a cause against his conscience.

(2.)How he calls upon those that had slighted him to bear witness concerning his conduct: "Here I am; witness against me. If you have any thing to lay to my charge, do it before the Lord and the king, the proper judges." He puts honour upon Saul, by owning himself accountable to him if guilty of any wrong.

III. Upon this appeal he is honourably acquitted. He did not expect that they would do him honour at parting, though he well deserved it, and therefore mentioned not any of the good services he had done them, for which they ought to have applauded him, and returned him the thanks of the house; all he desired was that they should do him justice, and that they did (Sa1 12:4) readily owning, 1. That he had not made his government oppressive to them, nor used his power to their wrong. 2. That he had not made it expensive to them: Neither hast thou taken aught of any man's hand for the support of thy dignity. Like Nehemiah, he did not require the bread of the governor (Neh 5:18), had not only been righteous, but generous, had coveted no man's silver, or gold, or apparel, Act 20:33.

IV. This honourable testimony borne to Samuel's integrity is left upon record to his honour (Sa1 12:5): "The Lord is witness, who searcheth the heart, and his anointed is witness, who trieth overt acts;" and the people agree to it: "He is witness." Note, The testimony of our neighbours, and especially the testimony of our own consciences for us, that we have in our places lived honestly, will be our comfort under the slights and contempts that are put upon us. Demetrius is a happy man, that has a good report of all men and of the truth itself, Jo3 1:12.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–5. Public domain.
Copy as
IrenaeusAD 202
AGAINST HERESIES 4.26.4
In this way, too, Samuel, who judged the people so many years and bore rule over Israel without any pride, in the end cleared himself.… In this strain also the apostle Paul, inasmuch as he had a good conscience, said to the Corinthians, “For we are not as many [are], who corrupt the Word of God: but in sincerity, but as from God, in the sight of God we speak in Christ.” “We have injured no one, corrupted no one, circumvented no one.”
John ChrysostomAD 407
HOMILIES ON 2 CORINTHIANS 24.3
For Samuel also put together a high panegyric upon himself, when he anointed Saul, saying, “Whose ass have I taken, or calf, or shoes? Or have I oppressed any of you?” And yet no one finds fault with him. And the reason is because he did not say it by way of setting off himself, but because he was going to appoint a king, he wishes under the form of a defense [of himself] to instruct him to be meek and gentle.… But when he saw that they [the people] would not be hindered by any of these things [the ways of the king] but were incurably distempered, he thus both spared them and composed their king to gentleness. Therefore he also takes him to witness. For indeed no one was then bringing suit or charge against Saul that he needed to defend himself, but Samuel said those things in order to make him better. And therefore also he added, to take down his pride, “If you will listen, you and your king,” such and such good things shall be yours, “but if you will not listen, then the reverse of all.”
JeromeAD 420
LETTER 69.9
That a priest must avoid covetousness even Samuel teaches when he proves before all the people that he has taken nothing from any one.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 12:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.