Daniel 6:4
“The Conspiracy Against Daniel”Daniel 6:4–9
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- אֱדַיִן'e·Da·yinthenH116AdvAdverb
- סָרְכַיָּאsa·re·khai·Ya'overseers theH5632N-mp ¦ ArtNoun Plural Masculine Definiteסָרְכַיָּoverseersאthe
- וַאֲחַשְׁדַּרְפְּנַיָּאva·'a·chash·dar·pe·nai·Ya'and satraps theH324Conj-w ¦ N-mp ¦ ArtNoun Plural Masculine Definiteוַandאֲחַשְׁדַּרְפְּנַיָּsatrapsאthe
- הֲווֹha·Vothey wereH1934V-Peal-Perf-3mpVerb Peal Perfect 3rd Plural Masculine
- בָעַיִןva·'A·yinseekingH1156V-Peal-Prtcpl-mpVerb Peal Participle Plural Masculine Absolute
- עִלָּה'i·Lahan occasionH5931N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
- לְהַשְׁכָּחָהle·hash·ka·Chahto findH7912Prep-l ¦ V-Hiphil-InfVerb Hiphil Infinitive Constructלְtoהַשְׁכָּחָהfind
- לְדָנִיֵּאלle·da·ni·Yelto DanielH1841Prep-l ¦ N-proper-mNoun Proper MasculineלְtoדָנִיֵּאלDaniel
- מִצַּדmi·Tzadfrom [the] side ofH6655Prep-m ¦ N-cscNoun Singular common gender Constructמִfromצַּד[the] side of
- מַלְכוּתָאmal·khu·Ta'kingdom theH4437N-fs ¦ ArtNoun Singular Feminine Definiteמַלְכוּתָkingdomאthe
- וְכָלve·kholand anyH3606Conj-w ¦ N-cscNoun Singular common gender Constructוְandכָלany
- עִלָּה'i·LahoccasionH5931N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
- וּשְׁחִיתָהu·she·chi·Tahand corruptionH7844Conj-w ¦ V-Peil-Prtcpl-fsVerb Peil Participle Singular Feminine Absoluteוּandשְׁחִיתָהcorruption
- לָאla'notH3809NegParticle Negative
- יָכְלִיןya·khe·Lin[they were] ableH3202V-Peal-Prtcpl-mpVerb Peal Participle Plural Masculine Absolute
- לְהַשְׁכָּחָהle·hash·ka·Chahto findH7912Prep-l ¦ V-Hiphil-InfVerb Hiphil Infinitive Constructלְtoהַשְׁכָּחָהfind
- כָּלkolas toPrep-k ¦ Prep-lPrepositionכָּasלto
- קֳבֵלko·VelbecauseH6903N-csNoun Singular common gender Absolute
- דִּיdithatH1768ConjConjunction
- מְהֵימַןme·hei·Man[was] trustworthyH540V-Hophal-Prtcpl-msVerb Hophal Participle Singular Masculine Absolute
- הוּאHu'heH1932Pro-3msPronoun Personal 3rd Singular Masculine
- וְכָלve·kholand anyH3606Conj-w ¦ N-cscNoun Singular common gender Constructוְandכָלany
- שָׁלוּsha·LunegligenceH7960N-csNoun Singular common gender Absolute
- וּשְׁחִיתָהu·she·chi·Tahand corruptionH7844Conj-w ¦ V-Peil-Prtcpl-fsVerb Peil Participle Singular Feminine Absoluteוּandשְׁחִיתָהcorruption
- לָאla'notH3809NegParticle Negative
- הִשְׁתְּכַחַתhish·te·Kha·chatit was foundH7912V-Hitpael-Perf-3fsVerb Hitpael Perfect 3rd Singular Feminine
- עֲלוֹהִיa·Lo·hiconcerning himH5922Prep ¦ 3msPrepositionעֲלוֹconcerningהִיhim
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era map

Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Daniel 6:1–5. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
We are told concerning Daniel,
I.What a great man he was.
When Darius, upon his accession to the crown of Babylon by conquest, new-modelled the government, he made Daniel prime-minister of state, set him at the helm, and made him first commissioner both of the treasury and of the great seal. Darius's dominion was very large; all he got by his conquests and acquests was that he had so many more countries to take care of; no more can be expected from himself than what one man can do, and therefore others must be employed under him. He set over the kingdom 120 princes (Daniel 6:1), and appointed them their districts, in which they were to administer justice, preserve the public peace, and levy the king's revenue. Note, Inferior magistrates are ministers of God to us for good as well as the sovereign; and therefore we must submit ourselves both to the king as supreme and to the governors that are constituted and commissioned by him, 1 Peter 2:13, 1 Peter 2:14. Over these princes there was a triumvirate, or three presidents, who were to take and state the public accounts, to receive appeals from the princes, or complaints against them in case of mal-administration, that the king should have no damage (Daniel 6:2), that he should not sustain loss in his revenue and that the power he delegated to the princes might not be abused to the oppression of the subject, for by that the king (whether he thinks so or no) receives real damage, both as it alienates the affections of his people from him and as it provokes the displeasure of his God against him. Of these three Daniel was chief, because he was found to go beyond them all in all manner of princely qualifications. He was preferred above the presidents and princes (Daniel 6:3), and so wonderfully well pleased the king was with his management that he thought to set him over the whole realm, and let him place and displace at his pleasure. Now,
1.We must take notice of it to the praise of Darius that he would prefer a man thus purely for his personal merit, and his fitness for business; and those sovereigns that would be well served must go by that rule. Daniel had been a great man in the kingdom that was conquered, and for that reason, one would think, should have been looked upon as an enemy, and as such imprisoned or banished. He was a native of a foreign kingdom, and a ruined one, and upon that account might have been despised as a stranger and captive. But, Darius, it seems, was very quick-sighted in judging of men's capacities, and was soon aware that this Daniel had something extraordinary in him, and therefore, though no doubt he had creatures of his own, not a few, that expected preferment in this newly-conquered kingdom, and were gaping for it, and those that had been long his confidants would depend upon it that they should be now his presidents, yet so well did he consult the public welfare that, finding Daniel to excel them all in prudence and virtue, and probably having heard of his being divinely inspired, he made him his right hand.
2.We must take notice of it, to the glory of God, that, though Daniel was now very old (it was above seventy years since he was brought a captive to Babylon), yet he was as able as ever for business both in body and mind, and that he who had continued faithful to his religion through all the temptations of the foregoing reigns in a new government was as much respected as ever. He kept in by being an oak, not by being a willow, by a constancy in virtue, not by a pliableness to vice. Such honesty is the best policy, for it secures a reputation; and those who thus honour God he will honour.
II.What a good man he was:
An excellent spirit was in him, Daniel 6:3. And he was faithful to every trust, dealt fairly between the sovereign and the subject, and took care that neither should be wronged, so that there was no error, or fault, to be found in him, Daniel 6:4. He was not only not chargeable with any treachery or dishonesty, but not even with any mistake or indiscretion. He never made any blunder, nor had any occasion to plead inadvertency or forgetfulness for his excuse. This is recorded for an example to all that are in places of public trust to approve themselves both careful and conscientious, that they may be free, not only from fault, but from error, not only from crime, but from mistake.
III.What ill-will was borne him, both for his greatness and for his goodness.
The presidents and princes envied him because he was advanced above them, and probably hated him because he had a watchful eye upon them and took care they should not wrong the government to enrich themselves. See here,
1.The cause of envy, and that is every thing that is good. Solomon complains of it as a vexation that for every right work a man is envied of his neighbour (Ecclesiastes 4:4), that the better a man is the worse he is thought of by his rivals. Daniel is envied because he has a more excellent spirit than his neighbours.
2.The effect of envy, and that is every thing that is bad. Those that envied Daniel sought no less than his ruin. His disgrace would not serve them; it was his death that they desired. Wrath is cruel, and anger is outrageous, but who can stand before envy? Proverbs 27:4. Daniel's enemies set spies upon him, to observe him in the management of his place; they sought to find occasion against him, something on which to ground an accusation concerning the kingdom, some instance of neglect or partiality, some hasty word spoken, some person borne hard upon, or some necessary business overlooked. And if they could but have found the mote, the mole-hill, of a mistake, it would have been soon improved to the beam, to the mountain, of an unpardonable misdemeanour. But they could find no occasion against him; they owned that they could not. Daniel always acted honestly, and now the more warily, and stood the more upon his guard, because of his observers, Psalm 27:11. Note, We have all need to walk circumspectly, because we have many eyes upon us, and some that watch for our halting. Those especially have need to carry their cup even that have it full. They concluded, at length, that they should not find any occasion against him except concerning the law of his God Daniel 6:5. It seems then that Daniel kept up the profession of his religion, and held it fast without wavering or shrinking, and yet that was no bar to his preferment; there was no law that required him to be of the king's religion, or incapacitated him to bear office in the state unless he were. It was all one to the king what God he prayed to, so long as he did the business of his place faithfully and well. He was at the king's service usque ad aras - as far as the altars; but there he left him. In this matter therefore his enemies hoped to ensnare him. Quaerendum est crimen laesae religionis ubi majestatis deficit - When treason could not be charged upon him he was accused of impiety. Grotius. Note, It is an excellent thing, and much for the glory of God, when those who profess religion conduct themselves so inoffensively in their whole conversation that their most watchful spiteful enemies may find no occasion of blaming them, save only in the matters of their God, in which they walk according to their consciences. It is observable that, when Daniel's enemies could find no occasion against him concerning the kingdom, they had so much sense of justice left that they did not suborn witnesses against him to accuse him of crimes he was innocent of, and to swear treason upon him, wherein they shame many that were called Jews and are called Christians.
Historical interpretation
Historical reception
1 surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
Verses 3, 4. "Moreover the king was planning to set Daniel over the whole realm. Consequently the princes and satraps sought an opportunity to find out something against Daniel as touching the king..." Instead of "princes" - the rendering used by Symmachus - Theodotion translated it as taktikoi, and Aquila as synektikoi. And when I inquired as to who these tacticians or liaison princes might be, I read it more clearly specified in the Septuagint, which renders: "...and the two men whom the king had appointed with Daniel, and also the one hundred twenty satraps." And so it was the fact that the king was planning to appoint Daniel as chief ruler even over the two princes who had been associated with him in a triumvirate that gave rise to the envy and intrigue. They sought an opportunity to find out something against Daniel as touching the king. And in this passage the Jews have ventured some such deduction as this: the side of the king is tantamount to the queen or his concubines and other wives who slept at his side. And so they were seeking for a pretext in things of this sort, to see whether they could accuse Daniel of wrong in his speech or touch or movements of his head or any of his sensory organs. But, say the Jews, they could find no cause for suspicion whatsoever. Since he was a eunuch, they could not even accuse him on the score of lewdness. This interpretation was made by those, who make a practice of fabricating long tales on the pretext of a single word. I myself would simply interpret this as meaning that they were unable to discover any pretext of accusation against him in any matter in which he had injured the king, for the simple reason that he was a faithful man and no suspicion of blame was discoverable in him. Instead of "suspicion" Theodotion and Aquila have rendered "offense" (amblakema), which is essaitha in the Chaldee. And when I asked a Jew for the meaning of this word, he replied that the basic significance of it was "snare," and we may render it as a "lure" or sphalma, that is, a "mistake." Furthermore Euripides in his "Medea" equates the word amplakiai (spelling it with a p instead of a b) to hamartiai, that is to say, "sins."
Continue studying Daniel 6:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
Daniel’s jealous fellow officials search his handling of the kingdom for a charge against him and come up empty, because he is faithful and free of any error or fault.
“Then the presidents and princes”
The other two presidents and the satraps beneath them, the upper ranks of the whole government.
“sought to find occasion against Daniel concerning the kingdom;”
Their first line of attack was his public work, his handling of the king’s affairs.
“but they could find none occasion nor fault;”
The search was thorough, and it came back empty on every count.
“forasmuch as he was faithful,”
His faithfulness is the reason the verse gives, and it was his protection against their scrutiny.
“neither was there any error or fault found in him.”
Error and fault together cover both his competence and his honesty.
Passage studyDaniel 6:4–9
The Plot to Trap Daniel Through His Faith
Summary
King Darius had made Daniel one of the three presidents of his kingdom and planned to set him over the whole realm, and the other officials turned against him. In these six verses they comb through his work for a charge and come up empty, because he is faithful. So they decide to attack him through his obedience to his God. They go to the king together, greet him with flattery, claim that all the kingdom’s leaders agree, and ask for a law that for thirty days anyone who asks a petition of any god or man except the king will be thrown to the lions. Darius signs it, and under the law of the Medes and Persians it is fixed for good. The passage shows a life so faithful that the only charge its enemies could bring against it concerned the law of God, and it prepares the way for God to show that his power is greater than any law of man.
Daniel’s enemies search his work and find him faithful
These verses follow straight on from Daniel 6:1–3. Darius had set a hundred and twenty princes over his kingdom and three presidents over them, and Daniel was one of the three. Because of his “excellent spirit”, the king thought to set him over the whole realm. A Jew from among the exiles was about to stand above every other official in the empire, and their envy drives everything that follows in Daniel 6.
“The presidents and princes sought to find occasion against Daniel concerning the kingdom.” They went through his handling of the king’s business looking for a charge. In the Aramaic, “sought” is two words: hâvâʼ, the ordinary verb “to be”, and bᵉʻâʼ, to seek or ask. Together they say that the men “were seeking”, and they kept at it with one aim. “Occasion”, ʻillâh, is a pretext, a ground for bringing a charge against someone. They wanted any handle they could take hold of.
They found “none occasion nor fault”, and the verse gives the reason: “forasmuch as he was faithful”. The word ʼăman means firm, reliable and trustworthy. Daniel could be relied on in the king’s service because he was faithful to God, and his record held up under the eyes of men who wanted it to fail. The verse closes with two words for what they hoped to find. An “error” is a slip or a piece of carelessness, and a “fault” is corruption, so Daniel was found both careful and honest.
There is a quiet irony here. The investigation was meant to bring him down, and it became the clearest witness to his integrity in the chapter, given by his enemies. “The integrity of the upright shall guide them,” says Proverbs 11:3. David asked the LORD to judge him according to his righteousness and his integrity (Psalm 7:8), and Peter urges believers to live honestly among unbelievers, so that those who speak against them as evildoers will see their good works and glorify God (1 Peter 2:12). Daniel’s devotion to God showed in the work he did for a pagan king, in the whole of his life and in his public duties as much as his prayers.
Who were the presidents and princes, and who was Darius?
The “presidents”, çârêk, were the chief officers over the provinces, and Daniel was one of them. The “princes”, ʼăchashdarpan, were the satraps, the governors of the empire’s provinces. Together they made up the highest ranks of government, so Daniel faced the united opposition of the most powerful men in the kingdom. In a court like this, loyalty to the king was everything, and a charge of disloyalty or corruption could cost a man his life. The search for an “occasion” against Daniel was a deadly serious matter, and a foreign official raised so high was an obvious target.
Darius came to power when Babylon fell (Daniel 5:30–31). Scripture calls him Darius the Mede, and who he was in the records of the time is debated. Some take him to be a ruler whom Cyrus the Great set over Babylon, and others take the name as another title for Cyrus himself.
“Concerning the law of his God”
In verse 5 the officials say out loud what their search had shown: “We shall not find any occasion against this Daniel, except we find it against him concerning the law of his God.” “Occasion” is the same word, ʻillâh, as in verse 4. The sentence is an admission, from the mouths of his enemies, that Daniel’s work and character were beyond reproach.
So they turned to the one place where they were sure he would stand firm. “Law”, dâth, is a word for a royal edict, a decree or a law, and here it means the commands of Daniel’s God. “God” is ʼĕlâhh, the usual word for God in the Aramaic chapters of the Old Testament, which corresponds to the Hebrew ʼĕlôah. Daniel’s enemies understood him well. His loyalty to his God came first, and he would keep God’s law whatever a king commanded. Their plan was to arrange things so that his obedience to God became a crime against the state, and his greatest virtue became the charge against him.
The plan sets two laws against each other. Here it is “the law of his God”, and in verse 8 it is “the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not”. The two share the English word, and the rest of the chapter shows which of them stands. The empire generally allowed its peoples their own gods, as long as their worship stayed clear of the king’s authority, so the officials needed a law that would turn Daniel’s prayers into a challenge to the king.
Daniel and his friends had stood at this crossroads before, in the court of Babylon (Daniel 1) and when Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego faced the fiery furnace (Daniel 3). Jesus said, “Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake” (Matthew 5:10), and Paul wrote that all who will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution (2 Timothy 3:12). Daniel’s enemies came at him through his righteousness, because it was the one part of his life they could reach.
Flattery at the king’s door
“Then these presidents and princes assembled together to the king.” The verb rᵉgash is used of people gathering as a crowd, with a sense of commotion. They came as one body, by agreement, with their proposal ready.
Their first words were “King Darius, live for ever.” This was the customary greeting to a king, a wish for a long and prosperous reign, the same words the Chaldeans used to Nebuchadnezzar: “O king, live for ever.” On these lips it was flattery. The men who wished the king endless life were about to hand him a law that would bind him to condemn his most trusted servant and bring him great distress. Their courtesy was meant to put him at ease and make him ready to agree.
Scripture warns about this. “A man that flattereth his neighbour spreadeth a net for his feet” (Proverbs 29:5). A psalm laments those who speak with flattering lips and a double heart, and says that the LORD shall cut off all flattering lips (Psalm 12:2–3). Another says that the wicked plot against the just (Psalm 37:12), and that is what is happening here behind the bows and greetings.
A law to make the king the only one anyone could ask
Verse 7 is the officials’ proposal. They list five ranks, “the presidents of the kingdom, the governors, and the princes, the counsellors, and the captains”, which together stand for the whole government, and they claim that “all” of them have agreed. Daniel was one of the presidents, and the plot was made behind his back, so the “all” passed over the one man the law was aimed at.
“Have consulted together” is yᵉʻaṭ, to counsel or advise, used here of men advising one another and agreeing on a plan. The decree was planned with care. They wanted “a royal statute” and “a firm decree”. The word for statute, qᵉyâm, is a noun from the verb qûwm, “to rise” or “to stand”, and it means an edict, a statute set up in law. They wanted the king’s full authority behind it.
The decree forbade anyone to “ask a petition of any God or man for thirty days, save of thee, O king”. It covered every request, whether made to a god or to another person, so that for a month the king alone would be the one to whom anyone could bring a need. That put a man in the place that belongs to God, who said, “Thou shalt have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3). The psalmist warns against trusting in princes and calls the one whose help is the God of Jacob happy (Psalm 146:3–5), and these officials asked the whole empire to look to a prince for everything. Revelation describes the same demand at the end, when the image of the beast causes those who refuse to worship it to be killed (Revelation 13:15).
The penalty was the “den of lions”. The word gôb means a pit, especially one for wild animals, and here it is the pit where lions were kept. It was a known and dreadful way to put someone to death, and it made the law a matter of life and death. The officials built the whole decree around a habit of Daniel’s that they knew well, his prayer to his God three times a day toward Jerusalem (Daniel 6:10).
Why thirty days?
Thirty days was most likely chosen with care. It was long enough to be sure that Daniel, who prayed every day, would break the law, and short enough to look reasonable and temporary to the king. A month in which only the king could be petitioned also flattered Darius with a place above every god and man for that time.
“The law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not”
In verse 8 the officials press for action: “Now, O king, establish the decree, and sign the writing.” “Establish” is qûwm, to set up or appoint, and “decree” is ʼĕçâr, an interdict, a legal prohibition. “The writing”, kᵉthâb, is something written, the document itself. They wanted a written law with the king’s name on it.
The reason they give is the heart of the trap: “that it be not changed, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not”. The verb shᵉnâʼ means to alter or change. The book of Esther speaks of the same rule. A decree written among the laws of the Persians and the Medes was to stand unaltered (Esther 1:19), and a writing in the king’s name, sealed with his ring, was beyond any man’s power to reverse (Esther 8:8). The rule was meant to make the king’s word stable and dependable. In the hands of these men it became a way to bind the king himself to an injustice.
“Wherefore king Darius signed the writing and the decree.” “Wherefore” shows that he signed because they had persuaded him, and he believed the decree would add to his honour. The verb rᵉsham means to write down or record, and here it is the formal act by which the king made the document law, most likely by pressing his signet into wax or clay. “The writing” is the document, and “the decree”, the same word ʼĕçâr as in verse 8, is the prohibition it contained. With one act the proposal became a law that bound even Darius. Daniel’s name is absent from the verse, yet everything in it is aimed at him.
Could Darius undo his own decree?
Once the king had signed it, the decree bound him as surely as anyone else in the empire. That is why, later in the chapter, Darius was deeply distressed and tried hard to rescue Daniel, and found himself held by his own law (Daniel 6:14–15). His signature closed the trap as far as any human power could reach.
When the king’s law and God’s law collide
Scripture teaches us to be subject to the governing authorities, which are ordained of God (Romans 13:1), and Daniel had served the king faithfully and well. His case shows where that submission ends. When a ruler demands what God forbids, or forbids what God requires, God is to be obeyed. Peter and John told the council to judge whether it was right to hearken to men more than to God (Acts 4:19–20), and Peter later said, “We ought to obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29). The next verse of Daniel gives his answer to the decree.
Over all of it stands the God who rules the kingdoms of men and raises them up and brings them down, as the visions of Daniel 2 show. The officials’ law looked final, and it still lay within his rule.
Daniel and the blameless Son of God
Daniel was a faithful man, yet a sinner like the rest of us, and his blamelessness points ahead to the One who was without sin entirely. Jesus asked his enemies, “Which of you convinceth me of sin?” (John 8:46). Pilate, after examining him, said, “I find in him no fault at all” (John 18:38), and he said it again (John 19:4, Luke 23:4). Peter writes that Christ did no sin (1 Peter 2:22), as Isaiah had said of the suffering Servant (Isaiah 53:9), and Hebrews says that he was tempted in all points as we are, “yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15).
Like Daniel, Jesus was the target of men moved by envy, and Pilate knew that for envy they had delivered him (Matthew 27:18). His enemies too came with respectful words to trap him, when they asked whether it was lawful to give tribute to Caesar (Matthew 22:15–18). And like Daniel he was condemned for his faithfulness to his Father’s will, which he obeyed to the point of death (Philippians 2:8).
What Christ did with his blamelessness goes beyond anything in Daniel’s story. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), and God made him to be sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him (2 Corinthians 5:21). Daniel’s coming deliverance from the lions foreshadows the resurrection, when God raised Jesus because it was impossible for death to hold him (Acts 2:24).
The decree gives one more contrast. Darius’s officials tried to make the king, for thirty days, the only one anyone could ask. There is in truth one through whom every petition comes to God, for Jesus is the way, the truth and the life (John 14:6), and he promised to do whatever we ask in his name (John 14:13–14).
The God whose word stands
The law of the Medes and Persians claimed to be unchangeable, yet it was made by men, and men could be flattered into signing an injustice. God’s word stands because he himself is unchanging and righteous. “For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed” (Malachi 3:6). “God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?” (Numbers 23:19). “For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven” (Psalm 119:89). His purpose to save us in Christ was settled before the foundation of the world (Ephesians 1:4, 1 Peter 1:18–20), and “Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever” (Hebrews 13:8).
These verses also give us Daniel himself. His enemies searched his life and found only his love for God to use against him. Opposition still came, and its only root was their malice. That is the honest life Peter commends among people who speak against us, and its outcome rests with God. The king signed, the trap closed, and the next verse finds Daniel continuing to pray to his God as was his custom.
Daniel 6:4 This verse
“Then the presidents and princes”
The other two presidents and the satraps beneath them, the upper ranks of the whole government.
“sought to find occasion against Daniel concerning the kingdom;”
Their first line of attack was his public work, his handling of the king’s affairs.
“but they could find none occasion nor fault;”
The search was thorough, and it came back empty on every count.
“forasmuch as he was faithful,”
His faithfulness is the reason the verse gives, and it was his protection against their scrutiny.
“neither was there any error or fault found in him.”
Error and fault together cover both his competence and his honesty.
Daniel 6:5
“Then said these men,”
The same presidents and princes of verse 4, now stating the conclusion of their search.
“We shall not find any occasion against this Daniel,”
Testimony to Daniel’s integrity, unsought and given by those who wished him harm.
“except we find it against him concerning the law of his God.”
Their one remaining hope was his obedience to God, and they were sure he would keep it at any cost.
Daniel 6:6
“Then these presidents and princes assembled together to the king,”
“Then” ties this straight to their decision in verse 5. They came together, by agreement.
“and said thus unto him,”
“Thus” introduces words chosen with care to win the king over.
“King Darius, live for ever.”
The customary wish for a king’s long reign, used here as flattery before a proposal that would bring him grief.
Daniel 6:7
“All the presidents of the kingdom, the governors, and the princes, the counsellors, and the captains,”
Five ranks naming the whole government, set before the king to make the proposal look like the will of the entire kingdom.
“have consulted together to establish a royal statute, and to make a firm decree,”
A law with the king’s own authority behind it, meant to be binding.
“that whosoever shall ask a petition of any God or man for thirty days, save of thee, O king,”
Every request to gods or men was forbidden for one month, except those brought to Darius.
“he shall be cast into the den of lions.”
The penalty was death in the pit of lions, and the rest of the chapter turns on it.
Daniel 6:8
“Now, O king, establish the decree,”
“Now” presses for action, since they wanted it ratified at once.
“and sign the writing,”
The king’s signature was the act that made it law.
“that it be not changed, according to the law of the Medes and Persians,”
They appealed to a known principle of the empire, so that the king would be bound by the decree too.
“which altereth not.”
The closing words state the rule plainly, and the whole plot rests on them.
Daniel 6:9
“Wherefore king Darius signed”
He signed because they had persuaded him, believing the decree would honour him.
“the writing and the decree.”
The document and the prohibition it carried, now law. Daniel’s answer follows in Daniel 6:10.
Last revised