Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
So Baasha slept with his fathers, and was buried in Tirzah: and Elah his son reigned in his stead.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
So Baasha H1201 slept H7901 with his fathers H1, and was buried H6912 in Tirzah H8656: and Elah H425 his son H1121 reigned H4427 in his stead.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Ba'sha slept with his ancestors, and Elah his son became king in his place.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And Baasha rested with his fathers and was buried in Tirzah, and his son Elah reigned in his place.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Baasha slept with his fathers, and was buried in Tirzah; and Elah his son reigned in his stead.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Baasha slept with his fathers, and was buried in Tirzah; and Elah his son reigned in his place.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
So Baasha slept with his fathers, and was buryed in Tirzah, and Elah his sonne reigned in his steade.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Baasha lieth with his fathers, and is buried in Tirzah, and Elah his son reigneth in his stead.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon View full PDF
Baasha, Zimri, and Omri
Baasha, Zimri, and Omri View full PDF
Ahab and Ben-Hadad
Ahab and Ben-Hadad View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 9,290 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Kings 16:6 precisely documents the conclusion of King Baasha's reign through his death and burial, followed by the succession of his son, Elah, to the throne of Israel. This concise record not only marks a significant transition in the Northern Kingdom's volatile history but also serves as a solemn precursor to the swift and violent fulfillment of divine judgment previously pronounced against Baasha's idolatrous dynasty, mirroring the fate that befell Jeroboam's house.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse acts as the concluding statement on Baasha's 24-year rule, which commenced with his violent usurpation of Nadab, Jeroboam's son, thereby executing God's judgment upon Jeroboam's lineage as prophesied in 1 Kings 14:10. Despite being an instrument of divine wrath, Baasha himself persistently "did evil in the sight of the Lord and walked in the way of Jeroboam" (1 Kings 15:34). Consequently, the prophet Jehu son of Hanani was commissioned to deliver a parallel prophecy of utter destruction against Baasha's own house (1 Kings 16:1-4). Therefore, 1 Kings 16:6 functions as a critical narrative pivot, immediately preceding the rapid and dramatic fulfillment of this prophecy, which unfolds with Elah's exceptionally brief and tragic reign, detailed in 1 Kings 16:8-10.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Baasha's reign (circa 909–886 BC) was largely defined by relentless conflict with the Southern Kingdom of Judah, particularly against King Asa, a period vividly described in 1 Kings 15:16-22. Tirzah, identified as Baasha's burial site, held immense significance as the capital of the Northern Kingdom from Jeroboam's time until Omri relocated the seat of power to Samaria (1 Kings 16:23-24). The idiomatic expression "slept with his fathers" was a widely recognized ancient Near Eastern convention for denoting a king's death and burial, signifying a natural end to his life and his joining of ancestors in the grave, irrespective of his moral character or the nature of his reign. This era in Israel's history was characterized by profound political instability, frequent violent coups, and a pervasive pattern of syncretism and idolatry, starkly contrasting with the (ideally) stable and divinely sanctioned Davidic dynasty in Judah.
  • Key Themes: This verse profoundly contributes to several overarching themes prevalent in the books of Kings. It highlights the recurring theme of Dynastic Instability and Succession within the Northern Kingdom, where power was frequently seized through violence, and reigns were often abruptly terminated by similar means. It powerfully reinforces the theme of Divine Judgment and Prophetic Fulfillment, illustrating God's unwavering faithfulness to His spoken word, even when accomplished through the tumultuous actions of wicked rulers and the chaos of human politics. Baasha's death, though seemingly peaceful, directly precipitates the violent collapse of his dynasty, thereby fulfilling the prophecy against him, just as 1 Kings 14:10 had foretold the destruction of Jeroboam's house. This consistent pattern underscores the biblical principle that Disobedience to God has Inescapable Consequences, not only for the individual but often for their entire lineage, demonstrating God's sovereign hand in history.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • slept (Hebrew, shâkab', H7901): A primitive root meaning "to lie down" for various purposes, including rest, sexual connection, or decease. In this context, it is a common biblical euphemism for death, particularly of a king or patriarch. It implies a natural death and being laid to rest, but carries no inherent connotation of spiritual peace or divine favor.
  • fathers (Hebrew, ʼâb', H1): A primitive word for "father," used literally or figuratively. In the phrase "slept with his fathers," it signifies joining one's ancestors in the grave, emphasizing the continuity of generations and the finality of an individual's earthly existence and reign. It underscores a natural, rather than violent, end to life.
  • reigned (Hebrew, mâlak', H4427): A primitive root meaning "to reign" or, inceptively, "to ascend the throne." It can also causatively mean "to induct into royalty." This verb signifies the formal transfer of royal authority and the commencement of a new monarch's rule, marking the official succession within the dynastic line.

Verse Breakdown

  • "So Baasha slept with his fathers": This clause definitively marks the end of King Baasha's 24-year reign over Israel. The idiom "slept with his fathers" is a standard biblical phrase signifying a king's natural death and his interment alongside his ancestors. This stands in stark contrast to the violent manner in which Baasha himself ascended to the throne by assassinating Nadab, Jeroboam's son.
  • "and was buried in Tirzah": This specifies the location of Baasha's burial, confirming his interment in Tirzah, which was the capital city of the Northern Kingdom during his rule. This detail underscores his status as a legitimate, albeit unrighteous, king who died in power and was accorded a royal burial within the capital's necropolis.
  • "and Elah his son reigned in his stead": This final clause formally announces the succession of Baasha's son, Elah, to the throne. This is the customary formula used throughout the books of Kings to establish a new monarch and introduce the events of his subsequent reign, which, in Elah's case, would prove to be remarkably brief and violent, serving as the immediate catalyst for the fulfillment of the divine judgment pronounced against Baasha's house.

Literary Devices

The verse masterfully employs several literary devices. The most prominent is the Idiom "slept with his fathers," a common euphemism in the Old Testament for death, particularly of a king. This seemingly peaceful description of Baasha's demise creates a profound Irony when juxtaposed with the violent nature of his ascent to power and the swift, violent destruction that awaits his own dynasty. The verse also functions as a crucial point of Transition, structurally marking the conclusion of one king's reign and the commencement of another, a recurring pattern that highlights the cyclical nature of Israel's tumultuous history. Furthermore, it serves as a subtle yet potent piece of Foreshadowing, as the succession of Elah directly precedes the dramatic fulfillment of the divine judgment pronounced against Baasha's house, implicitly hinting at the impending instability and doom that will characterize the new reign.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Kings 16:6 stands as a potent theological declaration concerning the unwavering nature of divine justice and the inherent transience of earthly power when it operates in defiance of God's will. Baasha, despite achieving a relatively long reign through violent means, ultimately faced the very prophetic judgment he had instrumentally executed upon Jeroboam's house. His death, even if natural, initiated the precipitous downfall of his own dynasty, unequivocally demonstrating God's steadfast commitment to His spoken word and His sovereign control over the rise and fall of nations and their rulers. This passage powerfully underscores the principle that outward success or the longevity of a reign does not in any way negate the inevitable consequences of unrepentant sin and persistent idolatry. God's patience is never to be mistaken for His approval, and His judgments, though sometimes delayed according to His perfect timing, are always certain and just.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The concise account of King Baasha's death and his son's succession in 1 Kings 16:6 offers profound and enduring lessons for contemporary believers. It serves as a stark reminder that all forms of earthly power, influence, and success are ultimately fleeting and subject to divine sovereignty. Baasha's lengthy reign, built upon violence and sustained by persistent idolatry, concluded in a common grave, leaving behind a legacy of divine condemnation and dynastic collapse. This narrative compels us to critically examine the true measure of a life: not its duration or its outward accomplishments, but rather its profound alignment with God's righteous will and its contribution to His eternal kingdom. We are called to diligently cultivate a legacy characterized by unwavering faithfulness, uncompromised integrity, and humble obedience, recognizing that our ultimate accountability rests solely with God, who judges not merely our actions but the deepest intentions of our hearts. The inherent instability and ultimate failure of human kingdoms, as exemplified here, powerfully point us toward the enduring stability and eternal reign of God, inviting us to place our complete trust not in transient earthly authorities or fleeting achievements, but in the unchanging character and unfailing promises of our sovereign Lord.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the transient nature of Baasha's power challenge my own pursuit of earthly success or recognition?
  • In what areas of my life might I be tempted to compromise God's standards for perceived gain or stability?
  • What kind of legacy am I actively building, and how does it truly reflect my ultimate allegiance?
  • How does God's consistent fulfillment of prophecy in this historical account deepen my trust in His infallible word today?

FAQ

What is the significance of Baasha being "buried in Tirzah"?

Answer: Tirzah held immense significance as the capital city of the Northern Kingdom of Israel throughout Baasha's reign. Being buried in the capital city signified his status as a legitimate, reigning monarch who died while still on the throne. This detail indicates that his death was a natural end to his life, rather than a violent overthrow, which stands in sharp contrast to the violent manner in which he himself seized power by assassinating Nadab (1 Kings 15:27-28). It also sets the stage for the equally violent and sudden end that would soon befall his own son, Elah, within the very same city (1 Kings 16:9-10), highlighting the cyclical nature of violence and instability in the Northern Kingdom.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The relentless cycle of sin, divine judgment, and unstable succession so vividly portrayed in the history of the Northern Kingdom, perfectly encapsulated by Baasha's reign and its immediate aftermath, profoundly underscores humanity's desperate need for a truly righteous and eternal King. The transient reigns of earthly monarchs like Baasha, who ultimately "slept with his fathers" and passed away, highlight the inherent futility of placing ultimate hope or trust in human leadership. This narrative serves as a powerful pointer, directing our gaze forward to the advent of Jesus Christ, the King whose kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36), and whose reign is both eternal and utterly unshakeable (Hebrews 1:8). Unlike Baasha, who established his throne through violence and persisted in idolatry, Christ established His kingdom through the ultimate act of self-sacrificial love on the cross (Philippians 2:8) and now reigns in perfect righteousness and justice (Isaiah 9:6-7). The inherent instability and ultimate failure of every human dynasty, including Baasha's, serve as a stark and necessary backdrop against which the glorious, everlasting, and perfectly just reign of the Lamb of God shines forth as the ultimate and complete fulfillment of God's redemptive plan for all creation.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Kings 16 verses 1–14

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here is, I. The ruin of the family of Baasha foretold. He was a man likely enough to have raised and established his family - active, politic, and daring; but he was an idolater, and this brought destruction upon his family.

1.God sent him warning of it before. (1.) That, if he were thereby wrought upon to repent and reform, the ruin might be prevented; for God threatens, that he may not strike, as one that desires not the death of sinners. (2.) That, if not, it might appear that the destruction when it did come, whoever might be instruments of it, was the act of God's justice and the punishment of sin.

2.The warning was sent by Jehu the son of Hanani. The father was a seer, or prophet, at the same time (Ch2 16:7), and was sent to Asa king of Judah; but the son, who was young and more active, was sent on this longer and more dangerous expedition to Baasha king of Israel. Juniores ad labores - Toil and adventure are for the young. This Jehu was a prophet and the son of a prophet. Prophecy, thus happily entailed, was worthy of so much the more honour. This Jehu continued long in his usefulness, for we find him reproving Jehoshaphat (Ch2 19:2) above forty years after, and writing the annals of that prince, Ch2 20:34. The message which this prophet brought to Baasha is much the same with that which Ahijah sent to Jeroboam by his wife.

(1.)He reminds Baasha of the great things God had done for him (Kg1 16:2): I exalted thee out of the dust to the throne of glory, a great instance of the divine sovereignty and power, Sa1 2:8. Baasha seemed to have raised himself by his own treachery and cruelty, yet there was a hand of Providence in it, to bring about God's counsel, concerning Jeroboam's house; and God's owning his advancement as his act and deed does by no means amount to the patronising of his ambition and treachery. It is God that puts power into bad men's hands, which he makes to serve his good purposes, notwithstanding the bad use they make of it. I made thee prince over my people. God calls Israel his people still, though wretchedly corrupted, because they retained the covenant of circumcision, and there were many good people among them; it was not till long after that they were called Loammi, not a people, Hos 1:9.

(2.)He charges him with high crimes and misdemeanours, [1.] That he had caused Israel to sin, had seduced God's subjects from their allegiance and brought them to pay to dunghill-deities the homage due to him only, and herein he had walked in the way of Jeroboam (Kg1 16:2), and been like his house, Kg1 16:7. [2.] That he had himself provoked God to anger with the work of his hands, that is, by worshipping images, the work of men's hands; though perhaps others made them, yet he served them and thereby avowed the making of them, and they are therefore called the work of his hands. [3.] That he had destroyed the house of Jeroboam (Kg1 16:7), because he killed him, namely, Jeroboam's son and all his: if he had done that with an eye to God, to his will and glory, and from a holy indignation against the sins of Jeroboam and his house, he would have been accepted and applauded as a minister of God's justice; but, as he did it, he was only the tool of God's justice, but a servant to his own lusts, and is justly punished for the malice and ambition which actuated and governed him in all he did. Note, Those who are in any way employed in denouncing or executing the justice of God (magistrates or ministers) are concerned to do it from a good principle and in a holy manner, lest it turn into sin to them and they make themselves obnoxious by it.

(3.)He foretels the same destruction to come upon his family which he himself had been employed to bring upon the family of Jeroboam, Kg1 16:3, Kg1 16:4. Note, Those who resemble others in their sins may expect to resemble them in their plagues, especially those who seem zealous against such sins in others as they allow themselves in; the house of Jehu was reckoned with for the blood of the house of Ahab, Hos 1:4.

II. A reprieve granted for some time, so long that Baasha himself dies in peace, and is buried with honour in his own royal city (Kg1 16:6), so far is he from being a prey either to the dogs or to the fowls, which yet was threatened to his house, Kg1 16:4. He lives not either to see or feel the punishment threatened, yet he was himself the greatest delinquent. Certainly there must be a future state, in which impenitent sinners will suffer in their own persons, and not escape, as often they do in this world. Baasha died under no visible stroke of divine vengeance for aught that appears, but God laid up his iniquity for his children, as Job speaks, Job 21:19. Thus he often visits sin. Observe, Baasha is punished by the destruction of his children after his death, and his children are punished by the abuse of their bodies after their death; that is the only thing which the threatening specifies (Kg1 16:4), that the dogs and the fowls of the air should eat them, as if herein were designed a tacit intimation that there are punishments after death, when death has done its worst, which will be the sorest punishments and are most to be dreaded; these judgments on the body and posterity signified judgments on the soul when separated from the body, by him who, after he has killed, has power to cast into hell.

III. Execution done at last. Baasha's son Elah, like Jeroboam's son Nadab, reigned two years, and then was slain by Zimri, one of his own soldiers, as Nadab was by Baasha; so like was his house made to that of Jeroboam, as was threatened, Kg1 16:3. Because his idolatry was like his, and one of the sins for which God contended with him being the destruction of Jeroboam's family, the more the destruction of his own resembled that, the nearer did the punishment resemble the sin, as face answers to face in a glass.

1.As then, so now, the king himself was first slain, but Elah fell more ingloriously than Nadab. Nadab was slain in the field of action and honour, he and his army then besieging Gibbethon (Kg1 15:27); but the siege being then raised upon that disaster, and the city remaining still in the Philistines' hands, the army of Israel was now renewing the attempt (Kg1 16:15) and Elah should have been with them to command in chief, but he loved his own ease and safety better than his honour or duty, or the public good, and therefore staid behind to take his pleasure; and, when he was drinking himself drunk in his servant's house, Zimri killed him, Kg1 16:9, Kg1 16:10. Let it be a warning to drunkards, especially to those who designedly drink themselves drunk, that they know not but death may surprise them in that condition. (1.) Death comes easily upon men when they are drunk. Besides the chronic diseases which men frequently bring themselves into by hard drinking, and which cut them off in the midst of their days, men in that condition are more easily overcome by an enemy, as Amnon by Absalom, and are liable to more bad accidents, being unable to help themselves, (2.) Death comes terribly upon men in that condition. Finding them in the act of sin, and incapacitated for any act of devotion, that day comes upon them unawares (Luk 21:34), like a thief.

2.As then, so now, the whole family was cut off, and rooted out. The traitor was the successor, to whom the unthinking people tamely submitted, as if it were all one to them what kind they had, so that they had one. The first thing Zimri did was to slay all the house of Baasha; thus he held by cruelty what he got by treason. His cruelty seems to have extended further than Baasha's did against the house of Jeroboam, for he left to Elah none of his kinsfolks or friends (Kg1 16:11), none of his avengers (so the word is), none that were likely to avenge his death; yet divine justice soon avenged it so remarkably that it was used as a proverb long after, Had Zimri peace who slew his master? Kg2 9:31. In this, (1.) The word of God was fulfilled, Kg1 16:12. (2.) The sins of Baasha and Elah were reckoned for, with which they provoked God by their vanities, Kg1 16:13. Their idols are called their vanities, for they cannot profit nor help. Miserable are those whose deities are vanities.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–14. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Kings 16:6 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.