TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Kings 16 verses 1–14
Here is, I. The ruin of the family of Baasha foretold. He was a man likely enough to have raised and established his family - active, politic, and daring; but he was an idolater, and this brought destruction upon his family.
1.God sent him warning of it before. (1.) That, if he were thereby wrought upon to repent and reform, the ruin might be prevented; for God threatens, that he may not strike, as one that desires not the death of sinners. (2.) That, if not, it might appear that the destruction when it did come, whoever might be instruments of it, was the act of God's justice and the punishment of sin.
2.The warning was sent by Jehu the son of Hanani. The father was a seer, or prophet, at the same time (Ch2 16:7), and was sent to Asa king of Judah; but the son, who was young and more active, was sent on this longer and more dangerous expedition to Baasha king of Israel. Juniores ad labores - Toil and adventure are for the young. This Jehu was a prophet and the son of a prophet. Prophecy, thus happily entailed, was worthy of so much the more honour. This Jehu continued long in his usefulness, for we find him reproving Jehoshaphat (Ch2 19:2) above forty years after, and writing the annals of that prince, Ch2 20:34. The message which this prophet brought to Baasha is much the same with that which Ahijah sent to Jeroboam by his wife.
(1.)He reminds Baasha of the great things God had done for him (Kg1 16:2): I exalted thee out of the dust to the throne of glory, a great instance of the divine sovereignty and power, Sa1 2:8. Baasha seemed to have raised himself by his own treachery and cruelty, yet there was a hand of Providence in it, to bring about God's counsel, concerning Jeroboam's house; and God's owning his advancement as his act and deed does by no means amount to the patronising of his ambition and treachery. It is God that puts power into bad men's hands, which he makes to serve his good purposes, notwithstanding the bad use they make of it. I made thee prince over my people. God calls Israel his people still, though wretchedly corrupted, because they retained the covenant of circumcision, and there were many good people among them; it was not till long after that they were called Loammi, not a people, Hos 1:9.
(2.)He charges him with high crimes and misdemeanours, [1.] That he had caused Israel to sin, had seduced God's subjects from their allegiance and brought them to pay to dunghill-deities the homage due to him only, and herein he had walked in the way of Jeroboam (Kg1 16:2), and been like his house, Kg1 16:7. [2.] That he had himself provoked God to anger with the work of his hands, that is, by worshipping images, the work of men's hands; though perhaps others made them, yet he served them and thereby avowed the making of them, and they are therefore called the work of his hands. [3.] That he had destroyed the house of Jeroboam (Kg1 16:7), because he killed him, namely, Jeroboam's son and all his: if he had done that with an eye to God, to his will and glory, and from a holy indignation against the sins of Jeroboam and his house, he would have been accepted and applauded as a minister of God's justice; but, as he did it, he was only the tool of God's justice, but a servant to his own lusts, and is justly punished for the malice and ambition which actuated and governed him in all he did. Note, Those who are in any way employed in denouncing or executing the justice of God (magistrates or ministers) are concerned to do it from a good principle and in a holy manner, lest it turn into sin to them and they make themselves obnoxious by it.
(3.)He foretels the same destruction to come upon his family which he himself had been employed to bring upon the family of Jeroboam, Kg1 16:3, Kg1 16:4. Note, Those who resemble others in their sins may expect to resemble them in their plagues, especially those who seem zealous against such sins in others as they allow themselves in; the house of Jehu was reckoned with for the blood of the house of Ahab, Hos 1:4.
II. A reprieve granted for some time, so long that Baasha himself dies in peace, and is buried with honour in his own royal city (Kg1 16:6), so far is he from being a prey either to the dogs or to the fowls, which yet was threatened to his house, Kg1 16:4. He lives not either to see or feel the punishment threatened, yet he was himself the greatest delinquent. Certainly there must be a future state, in which impenitent sinners will suffer in their own persons, and not escape, as often they do in this world. Baasha died under no visible stroke of divine vengeance for aught that appears, but God laid up his iniquity for his children, as Job speaks, Job 21:19. Thus he often visits sin. Observe, Baasha is punished by the destruction of his children after his death, and his children are punished by the abuse of their bodies after their death; that is the only thing which the threatening specifies (Kg1 16:4), that the dogs and the fowls of the air should eat them, as if herein were designed a tacit intimation that there are punishments after death, when death has done its worst, which will be the sorest punishments and are most to be dreaded; these judgments on the body and posterity signified judgments on the soul when separated from the body, by him who, after he has killed, has power to cast into hell.
III. Execution done at last. Baasha's son Elah, like Jeroboam's son Nadab, reigned two years, and then was slain by Zimri, one of his own soldiers, as Nadab was by Baasha; so like was his house made to that of Jeroboam, as was threatened, Kg1 16:3. Because his idolatry was like his, and one of the sins for which God contended with him being the destruction of Jeroboam's family, the more the destruction of his own resembled that, the nearer did the punishment resemble the sin, as face answers to face in a glass.
1.As then, so now, the king himself was first slain, but Elah fell more ingloriously than Nadab. Nadab was slain in the field of action and honour, he and his army then besieging Gibbethon (Kg1 15:27); but the siege being then raised upon that disaster, and the city remaining still in the Philistines' hands, the army of Israel was now renewing the attempt (Kg1 16:15) and Elah should have been with them to command in chief, but he loved his own ease and safety better than his honour or duty, or the public good, and therefore staid behind to take his pleasure; and, when he was drinking himself drunk in his servant's house, Zimri killed him, Kg1 16:9, Kg1 16:10. Let it be a warning to drunkards, especially to those who designedly drink themselves drunk, that they know not but death may surprise them in that condition. (1.) Death comes easily upon men when they are drunk. Besides the chronic diseases which men frequently bring themselves into by hard drinking, and which cut them off in the midst of their days, men in that condition are more easily overcome by an enemy, as Amnon by Absalom, and are liable to more bad accidents, being unable to help themselves, (2.) Death comes terribly upon men in that condition. Finding them in the act of sin, and incapacitated for any act of devotion, that day comes upon them unawares (Luk 21:34), like a thief.
2.As then, so now, the whole family was cut off, and rooted out. The traitor was the successor, to whom the unthinking people tamely submitted, as if it were all one to them what kind they had, so that they had one. The first thing Zimri did was to slay all the house of Baasha; thus he held by cruelty what he got by treason. His cruelty seems to have extended further than Baasha's did against the house of Jeroboam, for he left to Elah none of his kinsfolks or friends (Kg1 16:11), none of his avengers (so the word is), none that were likely to avenge his death; yet divine justice soon avenged it so remarkably that it was used as a proverb long after, Had Zimri peace who slew his master? Kg2 9:31. In this, (1.) The word of God was fulfilled, Kg1 16:12. (2.) The sins of Baasha and Elah were reckoned for, with which they provoked God by their vanities, Kg1 16:13. Their idols are called their vanities, for they cannot profit nor help. Miserable are those whose deities are vanities.
Continue studying 1 Kings 16:5 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
1 Kings 16:5 serves as a concluding formula for the reign of Baasha, the third king of the northern kingdom of Israel, signaling the end of the summary of his rule. This verse indicates that the biblical narrative is selective in its historical presentation, pointing to external, likely official, state records—"the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel"—as the repository for further details concerning Baasha's "acts" and "might," thereby emphasizing the theological rather than exhaustive historical purpose of the Books of Kings.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse marks the formal conclusion of the biblical account of Baasha's reign, immediately preceding the record of his death and the subsequent succession of his son, Elah, to the throne in 1 Kings 16:6. Baasha's rise to power was violent, involving a coup against Nadab, the son of Jeroboam, which directly fulfilled the prophecy delivered by Ahijah against Jeroboam's house, as detailed in 1 Kings 15:29. His 24-year rule (c. 909-886 BC) was largely characterized by continuous conflict with Asa, king of Judah, particularly concerning control over the strategic border city of Ramah, a conflict highlighted in 1 Kings 15:32. The formulaic nature of this verse, which recurs throughout the Books of Kings, serves as a narrative device to transition from one monarch's story to the next, while simultaneously acknowledging the existence of more comprehensive historical documentation.
Historical & Cultural Context: Baasha governed the northern kingdom of Israel during a tumultuous period marked by significant political instability and a pervasive moral and spiritual decline following the division of the united monarchy. The phrase "the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel" (and its parallel for Judah) refers to official state annals or court records, a common feature of ancient Near Eastern kingdoms. These chronicles typically contained meticulous documentation of military campaigns, building projects, administrative decisions, and other significant events of a king's reign. The biblical authors, writing at a later time, likely had access to such records. They utilized these sources selectively, incorporating only those details that served their overarching theological agenda: to demonstrate God's sovereignty over human history, to illustrate the consequences of covenant faithfulness or apostasy, and to highlight the unfolding of His prophetic word, particularly evident in the prophetic condemnations against kings like Baasha, as seen in 1 Kings 16:1-4.
Key Themes: This verse, and the recurring formula it embodies, underscores several crucial themes within the Books of Kings. Firstly, it highlights the selectivity of Scripture. The Bible is not presented as an exhaustive historical encyclopedia but rather as a divinely inspired theological history, focusing intently on God's interaction with His people and the spiritual ramifications of their choices. The explicit mention of external chronicles implies that much secular detail is deliberately omitted because it is not pertinent to the sacred narrative's central purpose. Secondly, it subtly affirms the historical grounding and reliability of the biblical account; by referencing external records, the narrative implicitly suggests its rootedness in verifiable historical events, even as it interprets them from a divine perspective. Thirdly, it speaks to divine sovereignty and judgment, as even the "acts" and "might" of kings, though recorded in secular annals, are ultimately viewed through the lens of God's overarching plan and judgment.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The most prominent literary device in 1 Kings 16:5 is the rhetorical question, "are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?" This is not a genuine inquiry but a declarative statement framed as a question, designed to emphasize that the information is readily available elsewhere. It functions as a formulaic conclusion to a king's reign, a recurring literary convention found throughout the Books of Kings and Chronicles. This recurring formula serves several key purposes: it provides a consistent structure for the historical narrative, signals the transition from one reign to the next, and crucially, underscores the selective nature of the biblical account, directing readers to more exhaustive secular records while maintaining the narrative's distinct theological focus. It also subtly employs intertextuality, referencing external, non-canonical historical documents as a source of information.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
1 Kings 16:5, though seemingly a mere administrative note, profoundly illustrates the Bible's unique approach to history. It is not an exhaustive chronicle of every event but a divinely inspired narrative that meticulously selects and interprets history through a theological lens. The biblical authors were not merely historians but profound theologians, discerning God's sovereign hand in the rise and fall of kings, the inevitable consequences of idolatry, and the unfolding of His covenant purposes. By referencing external "chronicles," the text implicitly affirms the historical reality of the events while simultaneously asserting its own distinct, spiritual purpose: to reveal God's character, His righteous judgment, and His unwavering faithfulness to His word, even amidst pervasive human rebellion and apostasy. This intentional selectivity ensures that the reader's focus remains squarely on the spiritual lessons and God's sovereign involvement, rather than becoming lost in mundane historical minutiae.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
This seemingly mundane verse offers profound insights for contemporary believers. It serves as a powerful reminder that the Bible's primary purpose is not to satisfy our historical curiosity about every detail of ancient kingdoms, but rather to reveal God's eternal character, His perfect will, and His redemptive plan for all humanity. Just as the chroniclers of Israel selectively recorded events to highlight God's interaction with His people and His unfolding purposes, so too should we approach Scripture with a discerning eye, seeking its overarching theological message and its transformative implications for our lives. This verse encourages us to trust in the Bible's reliability, knowing that its authors were grounded in verifiable historical reality, even as they presented a divinely inspired interpretation. Ultimately, it calls us to recognize God's sovereign hand in all of history, from the grand narratives of nations and empires to the minutiae of individual lives, affirming that He is working all things according to His wise and perfect purpose, even when we only perceive fragments of the larger, unfolding story.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What were "the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel" and "the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah"?
Answer: These were official state annals or court records meticulously maintained by scribes in the royal palaces of the divided kingdoms of Israel (the northern kingdom) and Judah (the southern kingdom). They contained detailed accounts of each king's reign, including administrative decrees, building projects, military campaigns, treaties, and other significant public events. The biblical authors of the Books of Kings and Chronicles used these extensive archives as primary source material, selectively extracting and interpreting information that served their theological purpose of demonstrating God's covenant relationship with Israel, illustrating the consequences of obedience and disobedience, and highlighting the fulfillment of prophecy. It is important to note that these secular chronicles are distinct from the biblical books of 1 and 2 Chronicles, though the latter also drew upon similar historical records. The biblical narrative, while rooted in these historical facts, elevates them to reveal God's ultimate hand in human affairs.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
While 1 Kings 16:5 directly concerns the historical record of an Old Testament king, its underlying principle of God's sovereign oversight and the selective nature of divine revelation finds profound fulfillment in Christ. The "acts" and "might" of earthly kings, however impressive or consequential, ultimately pale in comparison to the "acts" and "might" of God Himself, supremely revealed in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The Old Testament chronicles recorded the reigns of flawed human rulers, often marked by sin and failure, but the New Testament presents the eternal reign of the perfect King, whose ultimate "acts" include His atoning sacrifice on the cross for the sins of humanity (Hebrews 9:26) and whose supreme "might" is powerfully demonstrated in His triumphant resurrection from the dead and His ascension to the right hand of God (Ephesians 1:19-20). Just as the Old Testament authors selectively highlighted what was pertinent to God's redemptive plan, so too the Gospels do not provide an exhaustive biography of Jesus but focus precisely on His essential words, miraculous deeds, sacrificial death, and glorious resurrection—the foundational truths for salvation and eternal life (John 20:30-31). All of history, including the reigns of kings like Baasha, ultimately points forward to or finds its ultimate meaning and culmination in the cosmic reign of the Lord Jesus Christ, the true King of kings and Lord of lords, who holds all power and authority (Revelation 19:16).