1 Corinthians 14:23
“Tongues as a Sign; Prophecy Brings Conviction”1 Corinthians 14:20–25
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- ἐὰνeanIfG1437CONDConjunction
- οὖνounthereforeG3767CONJConjunction
- συνέλθῃsunelthēshall gatherG4905V-2AAS-3SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Subjunctive 3rd Singular
- ἡhētheG3588T-NSFDefinite article Nominative Singular Feminine
- ἐκκλησίαekklēsiachurchG1577N-NSFNoun Nominative Singular Feminine
- ὅληholēwholeG3650A-NSFAdjective Nominative Singular Feminine
- ἐπὶepitogetherG1909PREPPreposition
- τὸtotheG3588T-ASNDefinite article Accusative Singular Neuter
- αὐτὸautoplaceG846P-ASNPersonal pronoun Accusative Singular Neuter
- καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
- πάντεςpantesallG3956A-NPMAdjective Nominative Plural Masculine
- λαλῶσινlalōsinshall speakG2980V-PAS-3PVerb Present Active Subjunctive 3rd Plural
- γλώσσαιςglōssaisin tonguesG1100N-DPFNoun Dative Plural Feminine
- εἰσέλθωσινeiselthōsinmay come inG1525V-2AAS-3PVerb 2nd Aorist Active Subjunctive 3rd Plural
- δὲdehoweverG1161CONJConjunction
- ἰδιῶταιidiōtaiuninstructed onesG2399N-NPMNoun Nominative Plural Masculine
- ἢēorG2228CONJConjunction
- ἄπιστοιapistoiunbelieversG571A-NPMAdjective Nominative Plural Masculine
- οὐκouksurelyG3756PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
- ἐροῦσινerousinthey will sayG4483V-FAI-3PVerb Future Active Indicative 3rd Plural
- ὅτιhotithatG3754CONJConjunction
- μαίνεσθε;mainestheyou are mad?G3105V-PNI-2PVerb Present Middle Or Passive Deponent Indicative 2nd Plural
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 1 Corinthians 14:21–25. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
In this passage the apostle pursues the argument, and reasons from other topics; as,
I.Tongues, as the Corinthians used them, were rather a token of judgment from God than mercy to any people (1 Corinthians 14:21):
In the law (that is, the Old Testament) it is written, With men of other tongues and other lips will I speak to this people; and yet for all this they will not hear me, saith the Lord, Isaiah 28:11. Compare Deuteronomy 28:46, Deuteronomy 28:49. To both these passages, it is thought, the apostle refers. Both are delivered by way of threatening, and one is supposed to interpret the other. The meaning in this view is that it is an evidence that a people are abandoned of God when he gives them up to this sort of instruction, to the discipline of those who speak in another language. And surely the apostle's discourse implies, "You should not be fond of the tokens of divine displeasure. God can have no gracious regards to those who are left merely to this sort of instruction, and taught in language which they cannot understand. They can never be benefited by such teaching as this; and, when they are left to it, it is a sad sign that God gives them over as past cure." And should Christians covet to be in such a state, or to bring the churches into it? Yet thus did the Corinthian preachers in effect, who would always deliver their inspirations in an unknown tongue.
II.Tongues were rather a sign to unbelievers than to believers, 1 Corinthians 14:22.
They were a spiritual gift, intended for the conviction and conversion of infidels, that they might be brought into the Christian church; but converts were to be built up in Christianity by profitable instructions in their own language. The gift of tongues was necessary to spread Christianity, and gather churches; it was proper and intended to convince unbelievers of that doctrine which Christians had already embraced; but prophesying, and interpreting scripture in their own language, were most for the edification of such as did already believe: so that speaking with tongues in Christians assemblies was altogether out of time and place; neither one nor the other was proper for it. Note, That gifts may be rightly used, it is proper to know the ends which they are intended to serve. To go about the conversion of infidels, as the apostles did, had been a vain undertaking without the gift of tongues, and the discovery of this gift; but, in an assembly of Christians already converted to the Christian faith, to make use and ostentation of this gift would be perfectly impertinent, because it would be of no advantage to the assembly; not for conviction of truth, because they had already embraced it; not for their edification, because they did not understand, and could not get benefit without understanding, what they heard.
III.The credit and reputation of their assemblies among unbelievers required them to prefer prophesying before speaking with tongues. For,
1.If, when they were all assembled for Christian worship, their ministers, or all employed in public worship, should talk unintelligible language, and infidels should drop in, they would conclude them to be mad, to be no better than a parcel of wild fanatics. Who in their right senses could carry on religious worship in such a manner? Or what sort of religion is that which leaves out sense and understanding? Would not this make Christianity ridiculous to a heathen, to hear the ministers of it pray, or preach, or perform any other religious exercise, in a language that neither he nor the assembly understood? Note, The Christian religion is a sober and reasonable thing in itself, and should not, by the ministers of it, be made to look wild or senseless. Those disgrace their religion, and vilify their own character, who do any thing that has this aspect. But, on the other hand,
2.If, instead of speaking with tongues, those who minister plainly interpret scripture, or preach, in language intelligible and proper, the great truths and rules of the gospel, a heathen or unlearned person, coming in, will probably be convinced, and become a convert to Christianity (1 Corinthians 14:24, 1 Corinthians 14:25); his conscience will be touched, the secrets of his heart will be revealed to him, he will be condemned by the truth he hears, and so will be brought to confess his guilt, to pay his homage to God, and own that he is indeed among you, present in the assembly. Note, Scripture - truth, plainly and duly taught, has a marvellous aptness to awaken the conscience, and touch the heart. And is not this much more for the honour of our religion than that infidels should conclude the ministers of it a set of madmen, and their religious exercises only fits of frenzy? This last would at once cast contempt on them and their religion too. Instead of procuring applause for them, it would render them ridiculous, and involve their profession in the same censure: whereas prophesying would certainly edify the church, much better keep up their credit, and might probably convince and convert infidels who might occasionally hear them. Note, Religious exercises in Christian assemblies should be such as are fit to edify the faithful, and convince, affect, and convert unbelievers. The ministry was not instituted to make ostentation of gifts and parts, but to save souls.
Historical interpretation
Historical reception
4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Even if a stranger should address his inquiries through ignorance to some other person and although he who is questioned by mistake is able to make a satisfactory reply, yet, for the sake of good order, he should keep silence and direct the stranger to him whose function it is, as the apostles did when the Lord was present. In this way, speech will be employed in a well-ordered and fitting manner.
These gifts were first bestowed on us the apostles when we were about to preach the Gospel to every creature, and afterwards were of necessity afforded to those who had by our means believed; not for the advantage of those who perform them, but for the conviction of the unbelievers, that those whom the word did not persuade, the power of signs might put to shame: for signs are not for us who believe, but for the unbelievers, both for the Jews and Gentiles. For neither is it any profit to us to cast out demons, but to those who are so cleansed by the power of the Lord; as the Lord Himself somewhere instructs us, and shows, saying: "Rejoice not because the spirits are subject unto you; but rejoice, because your names are written in heaven." [Luke 10:20] Since the former is done by His power, but this by our good disposition and diligence, yet (it is manifest) by His assistance. It is not therefore necessary that every one of the faithful should cast out demons, or raise the dead, or speak with tongues; but such a one only who is vouchsafed this gift, for some cause which may be advantage to the salvation of the unbelievers, who are often put to shame, not with the demonstration of the world, but by the power of the signs; that is, such as are worthy of salvation: for all the ungodly are not affected by wonders; and hereof God Himself is a witness, as when He says in the law: "With other tongues will I speak to this people, and with other lips, and yet will they by no means believe." [Isaiah 28:11; 1 Corinthians 14:21] For neither did the Egyptians believe in God, when Moses had done so many signs and wonders; nor did the multitude of the Jews believe in Christ, as they believed Moses, who yet had healed every sickness and every disease among them.
And to show thee that he introduced the term "sign" here, not as a thing which of course did some good, he added that which resulted from it. And what was this? "They will say," saith he, "that ye are mad" This however not from the nature of the sign, but from their folly. But when thou hearer of unbelievers, do not suppose that the same persons are in every case intended, but at one time they which are incurably diseased and abide uncorrected, and at another they which may be changed; such as were they who in the times of the Apostles admire the mighty things of God which they hear of; such as in the case of Cornelius. His meaning accordingly is this; that prophecy avails both among the unbelieving and among them that believe: as to the tongue, when heard by the unbelieving and inconsiderate, instead of profiting by it, they rather deride the utterers as madmen. For, in fact, it is to them but for a sign, i.e., in order to astonish them merely; whereas they who had understanding used also to profit by it: with a view to which the sign was given. Even as then there were not only certain who accused them of drunkenness, but many also admired them as relating the wonderful works of God. It appears then that the mockers were those without understanding. Wherefore also Paul did not simply say, "they will say that ye are mad," but added, "unlearned and unbelievers."
Having said then, that a tongue profited not, and having again qualified this statement by turning the charge upon the Jews, he proceeds to signify that it even doth injury. "And wherefore was it given?" That it might go forth with interpretation: since without this, it hath even the contrary effect among them that are without understanding. "For if," saith he, "all speak with tongues, and there come in unbelievers or unlearned, they will say that ye are mad;" as indeed even the Apostles incurred the suspicion of being drunken: for "these men," it saith, "are filled with new wine;" but it is not the fault of the sign, but of their unskilfulness; therefore he added, "unlearned and unbelievers," to show that the notion belongs to their ignorance and want of faith; for, as I before said, his object is to rank that gift not among things that are disparaged, but among those which do not greatly profit, and this, in order to repress them, and bring them to a necessity of seeking for an interpreter.
On the day of Pentecost the Jews said that the apostles were full of new wine. It is more or less the same thing here.
Continue studying 1 Corinthians 14:23 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
If the whole church speaks in tongues at once, an outsider or unbeliever who walks in will conclude that the believers are out of their minds.
“If therefore the whole church be come together into one place,”
Paul has the public gathering in view, the church acting as one body.
“and all speak with tongues,”
An extreme case, with every voice speaking a tongue and nobody interpreting.
“and there come in those that are unlearned, or unbelievers,”
The idiōtēs is an ordinary person unfamiliar with the church’s ways, and the ápistos has yet to believe. Paul expects such people to be present and counts their impression as important.
“will they not say that ye are mad?”
Maínomai is to rave. The question expects the answer yes, and the visitor leaves without having heard the gospel.
Passage study1 Corinthians 14:20–25
Tongues as a Sign, Prophecy That Convicts
Summary
Paul asks the Corinthians to think like grown men and women about their gatherings, while staying as innocent as small children about evil. He then shows from Isaiah that speech in other tongues is a sign for people who refuse to believe, and he sets two scenes side by side. In the first, a visitor walks into a church where everyone is speaking in tongues and concludes that the people are mad. In the second, he hears prophecy he can understand, his heart is laid open, and he falls on his face and worships God.
Grown in understanding, children in malice
Paul has spent three chapters on spiritual gifts (1 Corinthians 12–14). 1 Corinthians 12 teaches that the one Spirit gives many gifts for the good of the one body, 1 Corinthians 13 sets love above them all as the more excellent way, and 1 Corinthians 14 applies that love to the gathered church. He has just argued that prophecy is greater than uninterpreted tongues because it builds up the church (1 Corinthians 14:1–19). Now he pauses and speaks to the mind behind the disorder.
Corinth was a wealthy, crowded port, known for its immorality, and its culture prized fine speaking, public display and personal standing. The church had carried some of that in with it. It was divided (1 Corinthians 1:10–17), it tolerated sexual sin (1 Corinthians 5:1–13), and its members took one another to court (1 Corinthians 6:1–11). Tongues, the most striking of the gifts, had become a mark of spiritual status, and Paul calls that way of thinking childish.
He begins with “Brethren”, a family word, and then gives a rebuke. The word for children is paidíon, a diminutive of pais that means a little or young child. “Understanding” is phrḗn, a word that names the midriff in physical use and here means the mind, the faculty of sound judgment. The Corinthians were thinking about worship as small children think, pleased with what is loud and impressive and careless of what helps anyone else.
Then Paul turns the picture over. “In malice be ye children” uses a different word, the verb nēpiázō, to be as an infant. Malice is kakía, from kakos, “bad”, and it covers wickedness, ill-will and the wish to do harm. In that one area a believer should be as unpractised as a baby. In understanding they are to be “men”, and the word is téleios, which means complete or of full age.
Scripture gives this pairing of wisdom and innocence in other places. Paul writes to Ephesus, “That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive; But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ” (Ephesians 4:14–15). He tells the Romans, “I would have you wise unto that which is good, and simple concerning evil” (Romans 16:19), and Jesus sent out his disciples with the words “be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves” (Matthew 10:16).
How can we be children in malice in a world full of evil?
To be a child in malice is to be inexperienced in doing evil, while knowing perfectly well that evil exists. A small child has had little practice at bitterness, envy or revenge, and Paul wants believers to stay that unpractised, guarding the heart against ill-will even as their judgment grows sharp. The innocence he asks for is chosen, and it sits beside wisdom.
Jesus is the pattern of both. In him “are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:2–3), and he was tempted in every way as we are and stayed free of sin (Hebrews 4:15). Growing up as a Christian means growing “unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ”, which is the end for which he gave his gifts to the church (Ephesians 4:11–13). Paul has already told the Corinthians that believers have “the mind of Christ” (1 Corinthians 2:16), and that mind holds his understanding and his purity together.
What Isaiah said about other tongues
“In the law it is written” brings Scripture into the argument. Nómos is the law of Moses, and Paul uses it here in its wider sense for the Old Testament Scriptures, since the words he quotes come from Isaiah 28:11–12. The Corinthians are to see that his teaching about tongues rests on what God has already said.
In Isaiah’s day Israel had refused God’s plain and simple teaching through his prophets. So God warned that he would speak to them in another way, through the “stammering lips and another tongue” of the Assyrian invaders. A foreign language heard in their own land would be the sign that judgment had come. Paul’s word is heteróglōssos, built from héteros, “other”, and glōssa, “tongue”, so it means other-tongued, speaking a foreign language.
The quotation ends sadly: “and yet for all that will they not hear me, saith the Lord.” The verb eisakoúō means to listen to, and it carries the sense of heeding what is heard. God spoke plainly and was refused, then spoke through foreigners and was refused again. Hebrews gives the same warning from Israel’s rebellion in the wilderness, when hearts were hardened against his voice (Hebrews 3:7–19).
Paul’s point for Corinth follows from this. In Scripture, speech that the hearers are unable to understand is a sign of God’s displeasure with people who have stopped listening to him. At Pentecost the Spirit enabled the disciples to speak in other languages (Acts 2:4–11), and that sign stood before unbelieving Israel as a witness to God’s new work and to the seriousness of refusing it. A church that fills its meetings with uninterpreted tongues is using a sign of judgment as if it were the best food for believers.
Tongues are a sign for them that believe not
“Wherefore” is hṓste, “so that” or “therefore”, and it draws the conclusion from Isaiah. Tongues are the plural of glōssa, the tongue and so a language, here a language the speaker was given by the Spirit and had no part in learning. They “are for a sign”, and a sēmeîon is a sign, mark or token, something that points beyond itself. The people it is for are “them that believe not”, the ápistos, set against those who believe, pisteúō. The small Greek connectives dé and allá, both rendered “but”, set each half of the verse against the other.
So tongues mark God’s dealing with unbelief, as the foreign speech did in Isaiah. Prophesying, prophēteía, is the speaking of a message from God. It can include foretelling what is to come, and in this chapter its work lies mainly in the present, for Paul has said that the one who prophesies speaks to people for their edification, exhortation and comfort (1 Corinthians 14:3). That is why it serves “them which believe”. Paul’s measure for every gift is that the Corinthians should seek to excel “to the edifying of the church” (1 Corinthians 14:12).
Both purposes meet in Jesus. His miracles were signs to an unbelieving world, beginning at Cana (John 2:11), and he is the one who has made the Father known (John 1:18), teaching his disciples in words they could take in. Tongues and prophecy each carry on something of his own ministry.
Are tongues only for unbelievers, and prophecy only for believers?
Paul is naming the main purpose of each gift and deciding which should lead in the public meeting. He allows for the rest in this same chapter. A tongue that is interpreted builds up the church (1 Corinthians 14:5), and the one who speaks in a tongue speaks to God (1 Corinthians 14:2). Prophecy is given for believers, and it reaches the unbeliever too, as verses 24 and 25 go on to show.
Were the tongues human languages?
Believers differ here. Some hold that the tongues at Corinth were real human languages unknown to the speaker, as on the day of Pentecost in Acts 2. Others hold that they could also be utterances of another kind, a heavenly speech. Paul’s argument stands on either view, because speech that the hearers are unable to follow, left uninterpreted, builds up none of them.
What a visitor sees when all speak with tongues
Paul pictures the whole church gathered in one place, with everyone speaking in tongues. It is an extreme case, chosen to show where the Corinthians’ preference leads. Into this meeting come two kinds of outsider. The “unlearned” is an idiōtēs, a private person, which came to mean an ordinary person who lacks special knowledge of the matter in hand. Here it is someone unfamiliar with Christian teaching and with what goes on in the church, perhaps a curious visitor or a person from another religious background. The unbeliever, ápistos, is someone who has yet to believe the gospel.
Their verdict is that “ye are mad”. Maínomai means to rave like a maniac. Greeks and Romans expected public gatherings, civic or religious, to keep a certain decorum, and they connected raving with the ecstatic worship of some of their own cults. A church that sounded like that would confirm what its neighbours already suspected and send them away before they had heard the gospel. Paul asks his question expecting the answer yes.
The church’s meeting is a public witness as well as a family gathering. God is a God of order and peace (1 Corinthians 14:33), and what his people do together should show who he is. Paul goes on to give detailed directions for tongues and prophecy (1 Corinthians 14:26–33) and closes the chapter with “Let all things be done decently and in order” (1 Corinthians 14:40). Jesus told his disciples to let their light shine before men (Matthew 5:16). Paul tells believers to walk in wisdom toward outsiders (Colossians 4:5) and to pursue what makes for peace and for building one another up (Romans 14:19), and Hebrews urges us to keep meeting together (Hebrews 10:25). A meeting that an outsider can follow serves all of these.
Does Paul forbid tongues in church?
Paul puts a condition on tongues in the meeting, which is that they be interpreted. He has already written, “I would that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying” (1 Corinthians 14:5). The gift itself is good. What he corrects is its use by everyone at once, uninterpreted, when the church is gathered.
The principle reaches churches where tongues are rare. Preaching, songs and customs that a newcomer finds impossible to follow raise the same barrier between him and the gospel.
What prophecy does to the one who comes in
Now the same visitor comes into a meeting where all prophesy. Prophēteúō is to speak under inspiration, and what marks it here is that it can be understood. Two things happen to him. He is “convinced of all”, where elénchō means to confute or admonish, to show someone that he is in the wrong. He is also “judged of all”, where anakrínō means to examine or search out. One speaker after another says what God has given, and the visitor finds that it all describes him.
Verse 25 tells what this is like from the inside. “The secrets of his heart” are kryptós, concealed and private, the thoughts, motives and sins he has kept to himself. They become phanerós, visible and evident. Only God could know such things, so the man understands who is speaking to him. Scripture says that the word of God is “a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart” (Hebrews 4:12), and Jesus promised to send the Spirit, who would convict the world of sin, of righteousness and of judgment (John 16:7–11). It happened at Pentecost, when Peter’s hearers were convicted by his sermon (Acts 2:37). Jesus did the same beside a well in Samaria, when he told a woman the truth about her past and she was led to confession and worship (John 4:17–19).
The visitor’s response is to fall on his face. Bowing to the ground was the common posture of reverence in Israel and among the nations, before a king or a god, and proskynéō is the word for it: to prostrate oneself in homage. This homage goes to God himself, and it is the worship in spirit and in truth of which Jesus spoke (John 4:24).
Then he speaks: “God is in you of a truth.” The man who might have said “ye are mad” now reports that God is among these people. Isaiah had spoken of people from the nations coming to bow before the God of Israel (Isaiah 45:14), and the church’s commission to make disciples of all nations (Matthew 28:19–20) goes forward in an ordinary meeting where God’s word is spoken clearly. The visitor’s confession is completed in confessing Jesus as Lord (Romans 10:9). It looks ahead to the day when every knee will bow at the name of Jesus and every tongue confess that he is Lord, to the glory of God the Father (Philippians 2:10–11).
Does “judged of all” mean the visitor is condemned?
The judging here is an examination that brings him to the truth about himself. Anakrínō is a word for searching a matter out, and the search ends with the man worshipping, so its purpose is his salvation. Condemnation falls on those who hear and still refuse, as Jesus warned of the one who rejects him and his words (John 12:48).
Christ, the Word we can understand
God has always been a speaking God. He, “who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son” (Hebrews 1:1–2). Jesus is the Word made flesh, God’s clearest speech to us, and yet “his own received him not” (John 1:1–14). The refusal Isaiah described reached its height there, when many saw his signs, heard his teaching and stayed deaf to him.
He is also the way, the truth and the life (John 14:6), and he knows every human heart. When the church speaks God’s word plainly, it shares in Christ’s own work of making the Father known, and the Spirit he sent does the convicting. “God is in you of a truth” is true because Christ dwells in his people by that Spirit.
A gathering where God is heard
This passage shows a God who wants to be understood. He spoke through prophets and then through his Son, and he gives gifts to his church so that his people are built up and strangers can hear him. It shows him, too, as the one who knows every heart, and whose knowledge of us aims at bringing us to worship. The visitor in verse 25 is exposed and welcomed in the same hour.
The passage also gives a measure for a gathering, which is whether those present, members and newcomers alike, could follow what was said and meet God in it. And it gives a picture of maturity to grow into: a mind that thinks hard about what helps others, joined to a heart that stays a beginner at malice. If something you heard in church has ever searched you and left you feeling known, verse 25 tells you what was happening. God was there, in truth.
1 Corinthians 14:20
“Brethren, be not children in understanding:”
Paul speaks as a brother and rebukes in the same breath. Paidíon is a little or young child, and phrḗn is the mind. Their handling of tongues showed poor judgment about what builds up a church.
“howbeit in malice be ye children,”
The verb is nēpiázō, to be as an infant. In kakía, wickedness and ill-will, a believer is meant to stay unpractised.
“but in understanding be men.”
“Men” is téleios, complete or of full age. The verse opens and closes on understanding, with innocence set between.
1 Corinthians 14:21
“In the law it is written,”
Nómos here covers the Old Testament Scriptures, since the quotation is from Isaiah. Paul rests his teaching on what God has said.
“With men of other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people;”
Heteróglōssos means other-tongued. In Isaiah these were the Assyrian invaders, whose foreign speech was a sign of judgment on a disobedient people.
“and yet for all that will they not hear me, saith the Lord.”
Eisakoúō is to listen and heed. Even this unusual way of speaking was refused, and “saith the Lord” gives the refusal its weight.
1 Corinthians 14:22
“Wherefore tongues are for a sign,”
Hṓste draws the conclusion from Isaiah. A sēmeîon is a sign or token, and tongues, glōssa, are one.
“not to them that believe, but to them that believe not:”
The sign is aimed at the ápistos, the one who refuses to believe, as the foreign speech was in Isaiah’s day.
“but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.”
Prophēteía builds up those who believe, pisteúō, by telling them God’s message in words they understand. The connectives dé and allá carry the contrasts.
1 Corinthians 14:23 This verse
“If therefore the whole church be come together into one place,”
Paul has the public gathering in view, the church acting as one body.
“and all speak with tongues,”
An extreme case, with every voice speaking a tongue and nobody interpreting.
“and there come in those that are unlearned, or unbelievers,”
The idiōtēs is an ordinary person unfamiliar with the church’s ways, and the ápistos has yet to believe. Paul expects such people to be present and counts their impression as important.
“will they not say that ye are mad?”
Maínomai is to rave. The question expects the answer yes, and the visitor leaves without having heard the gospel.
1 Corinthians 14:24
“But if all prophesy,”
Prophēteúō, to speak under inspiration. This is the opposite case, a meeting full of speech that can be followed.
“and there come in one that believeth not, or one unlearned,”
The same two kinds of outsider as in verse 23, now one person, so that we follow what happens to him.
“he is convinced of all,”
Elénchō, to confute or admonish. Everything he hears shows him where he is in the wrong.
“he is judged of all:”
Anakrínō, to examine. He is searched by what is said, and the search is meant to bring him to God.
1 Corinthians 14:25
“And thus are the secrets of his heart made manifest;”
What was kryptós, concealed, becomes phanerós, evident. He knows that only God could have told these people what he has kept hidden.
“and so falling down on his face he will worship God,”
Proskynéō, to prostrate oneself in homage. Conviction ends in worship, with the body bowed as low as it can go.
“and report that God is in you of a truth.”
He says it aloud, and his words become a testimony to others that God is truly present among his people.
Last revised